Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
theos-talk · discussion list to go with THEOSOPHY WORLD
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Real people. Real stories. See how Yahoo! Groups impacts members worldwide.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Theosophical research without religious bias or emotional pre-conce   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #4623 of 53305 |
Bruce: "I would think a really good example of the accumulation of a
great deal of very reliable research and the use of valid and
insightful means of logical deduction can be found in The
Extraordinary Life and Influence of Helena Blavatsky, founder of the
modern Theosophical Movement, by Sylvia Cranston."

Brigitte: Yes I read Cranston, but if you want to read a
theosophical propaganda book like that it is good to balance it out
with at least the other side like Soloview (an insider, although
hated by theosophists), James Webb, Marion Meade, and Peter
Washington's "Baboon", Bruce Campbell's "Ancient Wisdom Revived"
should also be on the list.

But of course the real valuable books are the once that started
modern historical research in this field, beginning with K. Paul
Johnson's two SUNY books, followed by J.Godwin's "Theosophical
Enlightenment", Deveney's "P.B.Randolph" and "Astral Projection and
the early TS", do you own and studied, these ?
Further there are Maria Carlson, De Tolleneare "Devine Wisdom", and
Proterro's Olcott biography.
If not yet read, all of these are an absolute must if you want to
develop an initial understanding of the subject, after wich you can
try to find your way by researching current more specialized
literature.


It is unfortunate, and I wonder why, an initial impuls fueled by a
series of Theosophical History conferrences seems to have stopped
cold in its tracks. Paul, Godwin, and Deveney have largely
discontinued, ore extremely slowed down their research as in the case
of Deveney who has a since many years announced article coming up in
the July 2002 issue of the TH Quarterly.

But yes it takes more then just reading theosophical propaganda
literature of the religious kind, or hanging around e-mail lists
(that are most easely bombarded by the latter) , although that is a
good place to meet people that are at least interested in the subject
at large.

By the way anybody knows what is currently happening with Rich
Taylor ? He started to work on a thesis at Berkeley University about
Blavatsky and sources (books) about tibet, anybody knows if he
finished this yet ?
Brigitte

PS It simple isn't true that historical research is only an illusion
or "only relative", there is a difference, in fact otherwise notting
would exist. And it has notting to do with hatred that is a judgement
that only springs from your own mind. To get rid of such pre-
conceptions some meditation might be good for you, ask Ian.




Wed Jan 9, 2002 4:35 am

bri_mue
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email

Forward
Message #4623 of 53305 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

Bruce: "I would think a really good example of the accumulation of a great deal of very reliable research and the use of valid and insightful means of logical...
bri_mue
Offline Send Email
Jan 9, 2002
4:35 am

... a ... the ... Prothero wrote an interesting essay on the mid-90s spate of books about HPB in the Religious Studies Review. He semi-explicitly ranks them...
kpauljohnson
Offline Send Email
Jan 9, 2002
2:11 pm

... Yes, unlike Meade, Williams and Solovyoff, these are objective and not hostile. They are also not paeans to the subject matter like Cranston's book. ... ...
Steve Stubbs
stevestubbs
Offline Send Email
Jan 9, 2002
3:27 pm

... I don't think this reason applies. Godwin already has earned his academic stripes; a lawyer and a librarian aren't going to do so no matter what subject...
kpauljohnson
Offline Send Email
Jan 9, 2002
4:46 pm

... More to ... Thanks for the clarification. At an abstract level what you have said is that there is nothing in it. The details of why this would be so are...
Steve Stubbs
stevestubbs
Offline Send Email
Jan 9, 2002
5:52 pm
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help