Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
theos-talk · discussion list to go with THEOSOPHY WORLD
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Show off your group to the world. Share a photo of your group with us.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
To Brigitte - Tulku   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #4431 of 53313 |
Brigitte, thanks for the very interesting post on the tulku. All of which is
true.

<<<<<<In his recent book about Blavatsky "The Book of Dzyan" Tim Maroney
Blavatsky supposed to have shown the symptoms Dissociative Identity Disorder
(DID), and that did played a decisive role in her
experiences and behaviour.

I cannot say much to that, this is something a person with a certain background
in psychiatry would have to look into.>>>>>>>>

How about a background in psychology? DID is associated with lack of conscious
control of a central ego and is similar (but weaker) to what is called multiple
personality disorder (MPD), where different ego-complexes take over conscious
control periodically. MPD is usually caused by sexual abuse during childhood,
but DID is a weaker version and can have other causes, and the central
ego-complex usually does not lose consciousness when other ego-complexes
communicate like it does in MPD.

Now, the key phrase in DID and MPD as well as all other personality disfunctions
is "lack of conscious control." Mental illness, when diagnosed as such,
generally implies an inability to function properly in society. When this same
function (weakening or silencing of ego) is conducted consciously, even
deliberately, it becomes a psychic power rather than a psychic dissociation.
Blavatsky wrote that she never lost consciousness during these episodes, and so
we can rule out MPD. From everything that I have read, she also seems to have
had a very strong central ego-complex, and so I think we can rule out DID (this
usually occurs with weak ego's). This leaves us with the alternative of
deliberately allowing one's ego to become conscious of "another" for brief
periods of time. A psychiatrist or psychologist would say that this "other" is a
secondary ego-complex within the psyche. An occultist would say that it is
telepathic communication with another being, communication with another psyche
altogether, and possibly even with a discarnated psyche. I don't know of any way
to clearly "prove" one or the other.

Jerry S.
--





Sun Dec 23, 2001 1:02 pm

gschueler@...
Send Email Send Email

Forward
Message #4431 of 53313 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

Brigitte, thanks for the very interesting post on the tulku. All of which is true. <<<<<<In his recent book about Blavatsky "The Book of Dzyan" Tim Maroney...
Gerald Schueler
gschueler@...
Send Email
Dec 23, 2001
1:02 pm
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help