Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
theos-talk · discussion list to go with THEOSOPHY WORLD
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Want to share photos of your group with the world? Add a group photo to Flickr.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Re Concentration Letter   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #36217 of 53305 |
Re Concentration Letter

Dan writes <> and remarks:

<This specific KH letter dates
from 1888-1889-1890 when H.P.
Blavatsky was STILL alive.>

Well, She couldn't keep track of
Everything. Punch in on google KH, chohan,
or the like and see how many psychics are
getting all sorts of phoney messages.
If you look hard enough, you will
even be able to pick out a few
sentences that seem like they are
genuine. (I could write a few
sentences that seem genuine myself!
There are 10s of thousands of false
purported teacher-statements.)

<So WHO was the someone (mentioned
by Jake) to transmit this letter
if not HPB or Judge???>

Well, I think you know that it
was undoubtedly Julia ver Planck
("Keightly" AFTER 1891) - but you
want someone else to say it.

Actually, you LIKE the concentration
method described - so you think it is
genuine. I DISLIKE it and think it
is inconsistent - so I think it is phoney.

<Furthermore, why would Judge (after
HPB's death) include portions of
this KH Concentration letter in E.S.
Instruction #5?>

This was also the LAST ES
instruction sent out, and the lowest
in quality. Maybe it was the Last
because mistakes were made or doubtful
material used, and it was relized that
they could no longer be issued reliably.
Maybe whoever was typing up the
Instruction inserted material (the
short section containing the phoney
adept letter could be removed without
destroying the context, and the whole
Instruction would be in a more consistent
"tone.")

If dan can't tell the difference
between this purported teacher letter
and the genuiness of the Prayag Letter,
etc., - but keeps refering to them as
other "phoney letters" because fairy-seeing
Leadbeaterites like Sherman doesn't
like them - then gods help the poor man!

I've made numerous previous
statements, speculations about this
letter before - ALL of which dan ignored,
as usual, and he repeats ad infinitum
his own previous statements. I don't
plan on making any more comments. I
think the "concentrate on the master
as a living man in your heart" is a
phoney method, which especially some
women and homosexuals would find apealing,
(this is NOT pointing any fingers
specifically) - and I plan to say no
more personally on the matter.

- jake j.
--------------------------------



---------------------------------
Get your own web address for just $1.99/1st yr. We'll help. Yahoo! Small
Business.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




Sun Oct 1, 2006 2:59 pm

proto37
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email

Forward
Message #36217 of 53305 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

Re Concentration Letter Dan writes <> and remarks: <This specific KH letter dates from 1888-1889-1890 when H.P. Blavatsky was STILL alive.> Well, She couldn't...
Mark Jaqua
proto37
Offline Send Email
Oct 1, 2006
3:03 pm
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help