Some comments from a brief review: The unique elements of Metzger’s first three editions are maintained: the material on manuscripts themselves, the careful...
1541
wellssc2002
Jan 19, 2006 11:53 am
I am looking to purchase Metzger's "Text of the New Testament." What are the merits of the 4th ed over the 3rd? Is it worth the extra dollars for the 4th? ...
1540
K. Martin Heide
surfyahu
Jan 19, 2006 11:15 am
This variant discussed for some days now is, in my estimation, misunderstood if we do not see the significance codex D assigns to human interaction. Codex D...
1539
William Warren
wfwarrenii
Jan 19, 2006 7:06 am
Bruce, you've brought up an interesting difficulty. In looking at W, I almost wonder here if the reading of TIS DIEPRAFMATEUSATO was changed, thereby leaving...
1538
Bruce Prior
n7rr
Jan 18, 2006 9:14 pm
Authorities disagree on the difficult-to-decipher reading of the Freer Gospels (W 032) in Luke 19:15. Prior & Brown, Goodspeed 1914 (1913) and UBS Greek New...
1537
Jeffrey B. Gibson
jgibson000
Jan 18, 2006 3:22 pm
Does anyone have the texts of the following? POxy 904, 6 PEleph 13, 3; POxy 120, 14. Thanks. Jeffrey -- Jeffrey B. Gibson, D.Phil. (Oxon) 1500 W. Pratt Blvd. ...
1536
James Spinti
tweetynwiley
Jan 18, 2006 3:22 pm
In case you haven't seen it, there is an interesting interview with Stanley Porter at Evangelical Textual Criticism blog concerning his work on Acts: ...
1535
Stephen C. Carlson
scarlson_min...
Jan 17, 2006 7:11 am
... Juelicher's Itala edition has the following readings for Mark 1:41 -- a: Et iratus extendens manum et tangens illum ait ei: Volo, emundare. aur: Iesus...
1534
voxverax
Jan 16, 2006 6:48 pm
Malcolm R. - The title page in my copy of NTL (1906) says: Novum Testamentum Latine Textum Vaticanum cum apparatu critico ex editionibus et libris manu...
1533
Larry Swain
theswain
Jan 15, 2006 8:39 am
... Not really, several problems. First, the use of "autem": most VL Latin translations and texts follow the Greek text fairly closely and it is unlikely that...
1532
sarban
andrewcriddle
Jan 14, 2006 11:32 am
... From: Stephen Payne To: textualcriticism@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2006 9:52 PM Subject: Re: [textualcriticism] Mark 1:41 and the Latin...
1531
Stephen Payne
brspayne
Jan 14, 2006 8:35 am
Well done. I think Malcolm presented his argument very well indeed. I am inclined to think it possible that a careless scribe merged the M for auteM with...
1530
Larry Swain
theswain
Jan 14, 2006 8:35 am
... Not require no, but strongly suggests. Like Greek, the "et" plus a new main verb signals a change in subject, and iratus can not really be separated from...
1529
Marek Kowalski
marek_jazer
Jan 12, 2006 6:13 pm
Dear Friends, I have question about the age of the following papyrus, namely: (P.Duk.inv. 740) - LXX Psalm 88: 4-8 and 15-18 which is placed on site:...
1528
malcolm robertson
mjriii2003
Jan 12, 2006 6:13 pm
Jim Snapp wrote: "Here's the text of d (the Latin part of Codex Bezae) in Mark 1:40-41, line-by-line as it appears in the manuscript. Et venit ad eum leprosus...
1527
Michael Marlowe
m_d_marlowe
Jan 10, 2006 4:03 pm
... This may be true if you have in mind only the critical commentaries published in the second half of the twentieth century. But earlier commentators tended...
1526
Wieland Willker
blende7
Jan 10, 2006 11:45 am
TCG 2006 An Online Textual Commentary on the Greek Gospels Fourth edition out now! http://www.uni-bremen.de/~wie/TCG/index.html Things have settled a bit....
1525
Peter Head
petermh2004
Jan 10, 2006 11:38 am
I can't recall that ORGISTHEIS has ever been included in any edition of the Greek NT; but it is practically the majority opinion among commentators on Mark...
1524
voxverax
Jan 10, 2006 7:13 am
Larry Swain, LS: "The "iratus" modifies the subject of the verb "extendit";, and that is usually understood as being Jesus." Yes, but in a Latin text like the...
1523
Larry Swain
theswain
Jan 9, 2006 9:16 pm
... The "iratus" modifies the subject of the verb "extendit";, and that is usually understood as being Jesus. -- _______________________________________________...
1522
Jovial
jovial1000
Jan 9, 2006 9:15 pm
Very true, and I can see that as being more likely, simply because people figure "what's the harm" if a particular reading is in another passage of scripture...
1521
xt7rt
Jan 9, 2006 12:23 pm
... probability into certainty, where other equally viable reasons for corruption exist." ... It seems to me we need to distinguish between how a variant gets ...
1520
K. Martin Heide
surfyahu
Jan 9, 2006 9:59 am
Michael Marlowe wrote: Daniel Wallace wrote: But one has to wonder why the Western text would create such a reading: there is no unintentional reason that one...
1519
Jovial
jovial1000
Jan 9, 2006 9:59 am
((((((( Ehrman too often turns mere possibility into probability, and probability into certainty, where other equally viable reasons for corruption exist." ...
1518
sarban
andrewcriddle
Jan 9, 2006 9:58 am
... From: "Wieland Willker" <willker@...> To: <textualcriticism@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Sunday, January 08, 2006 9:32 AM Subject:...
1517
voxverax
Jan 9, 2006 7:04 am
Dr. Wallace & Dr. Ehrman ~ There *is* an unintentional reason that one can muster for the creation of "orgistheis" -- I mentioned it in post #1502: ...
1516
voxverax
Jan 9, 2006 7:03 am
Here's the text of d (the Latin part of Codex Bezae) in Mark 1:40-41, line-by-line as it appears in the manuscript. Et venit ad eum leprosus deprecans eum et...
1515
Michael Marlowe
m_d_marlowe
Jan 9, 2006 7:02 am
... This is what I was complaining about earlier, the idea that we must have a clear and probable explanation for readings in D before they can be set aside. I...
1514
Michael Marlowe
m_d_marlowe
Jan 8, 2006 9:13 pm
... It seems to me that your approach to D is far more eclectic than Hort's approach to it. Michael...
1513
sarban
andrewcriddle
Jan 8, 2006 9:13 pm
... From: "Daniel B. Wallace" <csntm@...> To: <textualcriticism@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Saturday, January 07, 2006 9:56 PM Subject: Re:...
