In reference to the bit of discussion recently on the differences between TR and Majority text, etc., could someone provide a simple definition of the...
1403
Robert B. Waltz ...
Jan 2, 1997 6:56 pm
... TR = Textus Receptus. An edition substantially identical to that which Erasmus published in the early sixteenth century. The most widely mentioned TR...
1404
Mike Arcieri ...
Jan 3, 1997 7:59 am
... what will become >of it. Actually, Arthur Farstad put out the Gospel of John called "Living Water The Gospel of John - Logos 21 Version" meaning the Word...
1405
Ronald L. Minton ...
Jan 3, 1997 6:30 pm
Dr. Waltz, very good summary, I also add my $0.02 :) ... The Oxford 1825 was used by H&F, so has become a convenient TR used by many. ... c. 1850...
1406
Robert B. Waltz ...
Jan 3, 1997 7:27 pm
... Just have to remind everyone that I am not a doctor, nor even a seminarian. Just a person trained in Physics and Math and gifted (?) with a bog mouth (or,...
1407
Jim West ...
Jan 4, 1997 5:32 am
I would appreciate it if someone could provide me with the bibliography of P90 and P98. I.e., I wish to know where they are published. Thanks, Jim ...
1408
Maurice Robinson ...
Jan 4, 1997 6:25 am
... The problem is that for many years Dallas Seminary itself reprinted and used the Oxford 1825 TR, and that is what H/F used. Virtually no one else ...
1409
Jim West ...
Jan 4, 1997 6:35 am
... I don't know if this is what you want- but the TR is indeed available in the States. I will try to find out the publisher Monday- but I think it is ...
1410
Jim West ...
Jan 4, 1997 6:44 am
Yes, I found it. The publisher is AMG Publications. Their number is either 615 894-6060 or 423 894-6060 (I am not sure which because recently we have all had...
1411
Maurice Robinson ...
Jan 4, 1997 7:15 am
... Even if the Oxford 1825 TR might be available in print (it is a public domain text in any case), there really is _no_ reason for anyone to use it for...
1412
Maurice Robinson ...
Jan 4, 1997 7:17 am
... That is a "TR", but it most emphatically is NOT the Oxford 1825 TR which had previously been reprinted by Dallas Seminary. Instead, that is the Scrivener...
1413
L. Mark Bruffey ...
Jan 4, 1997 4:24 pm
Hi Jim West! I believe New Docs vol 7 discusses p90. Mark Bruffey...
1414
Robert B. Waltz ...
Jan 4, 1997 5:36 pm
Maurice Robinson <mrobinsn@...>, responding to Jim ... This reminds us of an important point: Not all TRs are the same. Yes, they are highly...
1415
Jim West ...
Jan 4, 1997 7:19 pm
... What is this New Docs vol 7? Sorry, but I do not know this abbreviation. Yours, Jim ... +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Jim West, ThD Petros TN Adjunct...
1416
REElliott@... ...
Jan 4, 1997 8:10 pm
Dear colleagues: In light of the discussion of Mike Arcieri and Julian Goldberg Re. the Maj. text, has anyone any comments on a volume that I have found...
1417
REElliott@... ...
Jan 4, 1997 8:11 pm
Dear TC colleagues: I have recently been in discussion with a previous Greek professor of mine who is still using the Hodges and Farstad Majority Text. I was...
1418
Robert B. Waltz ...
Jan 4, 1997 8:20 pm
... There are any number of these Marshall volumes. I have a Marshall text with the RSV alongside. There's also one with the NIV, and I believe there's one...
1419
Robert B. Waltz ...
Jan 4, 1997 8:26 pm
... It depends on your purpose. If you want to reconstruct a text -- then, yes, the H&F apparatus is inadequate. It is inadequate even for the purpose of...
1420
REElliott@... ...
Jan 4, 1997 8:38 pm
TC Colleagues, As far as differing TR texts online I know that the Logos Bible program offers both the 1550 and 1897 TR as well as the Maj. text and the NA26....
1421
Ronald L. Minton ...
Jan 4, 1997 9:24 pm
My students have helped me make a table (one 500 page chart) of all the variants listed in HF1&2, UBS3&4, NA26&27. I will let you know as soon as we have it...
1422
Robert B. Waltz ...
Jan 4, 1997 10:12 pm
... Have you considered transferring this to a data analysis program -- or, failing that, a programmable database? It means you would have to do a bit of...
1423
Harold P. Scanlin ...
Jan 4, 1997 11:02 pm
New Docs is probably _New Documents Illustrating Early Christianity, 7_ (Macquarie U.), but I haven't seen volume 7. P 90 (Oxy 3523) is discussed by T. C....
1424
Maurice Robinson ...
Jan 5, 1997 1:38 am
... Bob and I would concur on this point. The H/F text probably should never have included an apparatus if the intent were somehow to demonstrate how a ...
1425
Dale M. Wheeler ...
Jan 5, 1997 4:08 am
I did some paste-up work on the original H&F Maj text while I was a student. One of the tasks I did as part of the checking/paste-up was to compare the H&F...
1426
Maurice Robinson ...
Jan 5, 1997 4:36 am
... As Wisse noted, Von Soden's accuracy in the matter of group designations is far superior to his accuracy with individual MS citations. I have a lengthy...
1427
Julian Goldberg ...
Jan 5, 1997 5:38 am
... When comparing the TR of Stephanus, Bezae and Elzevirs, it was found that the Elzevirs TR was more similar in agreement to the Bezae TR than the Stephanus ...
1428
Robert B. Waltz ...
Jan 5, 1997 5:55 am
Responses to selected snippets.... ... I suppose I should explain myself. In principle I agree with Robinson; the various versions of TR and the more modern...
1429
Ronald L. Minton ...
Jan 5, 1997 8:47 am
... Just for clarification, I thought Berry only did the dictionary in the back, and that Samuel Bagster did the actual interlinear. If this is true, we...
1430
Ronald L. Minton ...
Jan 5, 1997 9:04 am
Maurice wrote a good explanation of things, but the HF text has the advantage of coming last. Thus, it is my text of choice for casual reading and textual...
1431
Ronald L. Minton ...
Jan 5, 1997 9:19 am
Can any one tell me where our library can buy the Beatty and Bodmer Papyri in the nice multi-volume editions like I used when in Seminary? :) -- Prof. Ron...
