With apologies for cross posting: Just a reminder that out Seminar with Gerd Ludemann on his book _The Resurrection of Christ_ begins on Monday, Jan 3rd. We...
Jeffrey B. Gibson
jgibson000@...
Jan 1, 2005 9:05 pm
9947
I was bewildered, as were others, by Crossan's remark last year in the New York Review of Books concerning E. P. Sanders's non-use of gospel "source ...
John C. Poirier
poirier@...
Jan 5, 2005 1:39 pm
9948
Jack, Thanks for that. I too was intrigued by that most odd comment from Crossan (and I think Reed too? I haven't checked it up again). I wondered whether...
Mark Goodacre
goodacre@...
Jan 5, 2005 2:05 pm
9949
... You may be right, Mark. I suppose Crossan might not even be aware of Sanders's works on source criticism (but hopefully Sanders's rejoinder would have...
John C. Poirier
poirier@...
Jan 5, 2005 3:01 pm
9950
... If someone has a copy of Crossan & Reed's response to Sanders, I'd be curious to read them. The few quotes posted on the NT Gateway Weblog are...
Stephen C. Carlson
scarlson@...
Jan 6, 2005 4:09 am
9951
... John, I need a bit of help here. I don't know what a dagwood sandwich is. I wonder if you think it is a bad thing, too easily swallowed, that people think...
Peter Head
pmh15@...
Jan 7, 2005 12:26 pm
9952
... Sorry about that. A dagwood sandwich is simply an extremely tall sandwich. In the comic strip "Blondie", Dagwood Bumstead built sandwiches that looked to...
John C. Poirier
poirier@...
Jan 7, 2005 12:37 pm
9953
... A "dagwood" is an extremely tall, multi-layered sandwich. It's named after Dagwood Bumstead, the husband of the title character in the comic strip ...
Jeffrey B. Gibson
jgibson000@...
Jan 7, 2005 5:35 pm
9954
... Sorry, everybody. s Leeaann, Did you get Brooks the Picasso book? Synoptic-L Homepage: http://www.bham.ac.uk/theology/synoptic-l List Owner:...
Tim Reynolds
molad@...
Jan 7, 2005 11:29 pm
9955
Having now read the entire exchange between Sanders and Crossan/Reed (after finding it on microfilm last night), I'd like to follow up on my earlier comments. ...
John C. Poirier
poirier@...
Jan 11, 2005 6:47 pm
9956
This post is not about the synoptic problem, but I hope it will be acceptable. I need some advice. As many of you know, I haven't yet completed my Ph.D., ...
John C. Poirier
poirier@...
Jan 15, 2005 4:39 pm
9957
... That's both ridiculous and unacceptable. I would contact not the Dean but the President, and I would find the email address of every Trustee I could find...
Jim West
jwest@...
Jan 15, 2005 4:48 pm
9958
John, you haven't yet reached the length of time it took me to finish my Ph.D., but that was my own choice. Your advisor's (in)actions are unacceptable. The...
Horace Jeffery Hodges
jefferyhodges@...
Jan 15, 2005 6:32 pm
9959
Although it's probably unnecessary let me add one comment. I agree with Jeffrey that your advisor's action (or really inaction) is unacceptable. So, too, the...
Thomas R. W. Longstaff
tlongst@...
Jan 15, 2005 7:13 pm
9960
To: John Poirier Cc: Synoptic-L On: Advisor Problems From: Bruce [I wasn't going to reply, other than a note of encouragement to John privately, but as I was...
E Bruce Brooks
brooks@...
Jan 15, 2005 8:44 pm
9961
I'd like to thank everyone for the thoughtful advice about my problem. I'm not sure about the course I'll take, but I'll probably sit tight for a little while...
John C. Poirier
poirier@...
Jan 17, 2005 7:13 pm
9962
To: GPG Cc: Synoptic-L On: Synoptic Problem Memo (Rev 1) From: Bruce 0. [Apologia for Syn-L: The Farmer list of 18 possible Synoptic relations (Synoptic...
E Bruce Brooks
ebbrooks@...
Jan 19, 2005 9:38 am
9963
... Bruce, There is a larger list of possible relationships running around somewhere. I can't recall where at the moment. This "history" part you make...
Joseph Weaks
j.weaks@...
Jan 19, 2005 4:16 pm
9964
To: Synoptic-L In Response To: Joe Weaks On: Synoptic Relations From: Bruce JOE: There is a larger list of possible relationships running around somewhere. I...
E Bruce Brooks
brooks@...
Jan 19, 2005 10:01 pm
9965
... Thanks for the clarification. I understand a little better now your goals here. ... Right. I think, then, that we are talking apples/oranges. You're ...
Joseph Weaks
j.weaks@...
Jan 20, 2005 1:20 am
9966
To: Synoptic-L In Response To: Joe Weaks On: Synoptic Theories From: Bruce JOE: Right. I think, then, that we are talking apples/oranges. You're centering on...
E Bruce Brooks
brooks@...
Jan 20, 2005 2:17 am
9967
To: Synoptic-L Containing: Postscript on Yau Ji-hvng From: Bruce Didn't mean to be coy in mentioning a name of which many list members may not have heard. This...
E Bruce Brooks
brooks@...
Jan 20, 2005 2:41 am
9968
... Well, I do understand even more of your project and approach now. That's helpful. But, I do think we're still talking past one another. Most of what you...
Joseph Weaks
j.weaks@...
Jan 20, 2005 4:30 am
9969
To: Synoptic-L Cc: CGC (Comparative History Discussion) In Response To: Joe Weaks On: Theory and Method From: Bruce [Preface for the comparative law people on...
E Bruce Brooks
brooks@...
Jan 20, 2005 5:44 am
9970
I'd like to thank everyone again for all the advice concerning my situation. Yesterday I finally got an email from my advisor, after nine months' silence. He...
John C. Poirier
poirier@...
Jan 25, 2005 12:30 pm
9971
January 27, 2005 Shroud of Turin: Old as Jesus? By THE NEW YORK TIMES he Shroud of Turin is much older than the medieval date that modern science has affixed...
JesusQuest70@...
Jan 27, 2005 2:46 pm
9972
... Which one ? I never heard about other scientific datation test on the Holy Shroud. When have they been allowed by the roman hierarchy ? a+ manu Synoptic-L...
Emmanuel Fritsch
emmanuel.fritsch@...
Jan 28, 2005 8:26 am
9973
As I was going through my stacks of photocopied articles, I ran across Stephen J. Patterson's "Yes, Virginia, There Is a Q" (*Bible Review* Oct 1995, pp....
John C. Poirier
poirier@...
Jan 28, 2005 2:28 pm
9974
Are not Funk and Hoover (Five Gospels pp.10-12) guilty of the same crime as Patterson. Point is noted by Mark Goodacre himself in The Case Against Q page 21,...
Steph
dolfin@...
Jan 29, 2005 1:04 am
9975
If I understand the term "Lachmann fallacy" correctly, then this (that Mark comes last) is only a "theoretical" possibility, not really a probable scenario....
