With apologies for cross posting! This is the second notice of the annual gathering of Biblical and Biblical Studies E-Listers at the upcoming annual meeting...
9896
Tim Lewis
tlewistlewis@...
Nov 6, 2004 3:11 am
I would like to know if there is agreement amongst Farrer theorists about when a Mt-Lk parallel is (or is not) to be derived from Lukan dependence on Mt's...
9897
Tim Reynolds
molad@...
Nov 7, 2004 5:00 am
on 5/11/04 7:01 PM, Tim Lewis at tlewistlewis@... wrote: I would like to know if there is agreement amongst Farrer theorists about when a Mt-Lk...
9898
E Bruce Brooks
brooks@...
Nov 8, 2004 12:20 am
To: Synoptic-L In Response To: Tim Reynolds (on Tim Lewis' question) On: Lk's Treatment of Mt 5:39-48 From: Bruce TIM REYNOLDS: This whole class of cruces...
9899
E Bruce Brooks
brooks@...
Nov 8, 2004 10:50 am
To: Synoptic-L In Response To: Tim Lewis On: Mt 5:3[8]-48 || Lk 6:27-36 From: Bruce What the certified Farrer Theorists would say, we will know when all five...
9900
John Lupia
jlupia2@...
Nov 8, 2004 4:04 pm
... Perhaps Luke does not omit at all, and that it is Matthew who writes "you have heard that it was said" referring to Luke's Gospel that he (Matthew)based...
9901
Matson, Mark (Academic)
MAMatson@...
Nov 8, 2004 5:02 pm
Good question. Let me jump in with my own tentative reply, and I would like to see how other Farrer-type people respond. First, I would think that Luke knew of...
9902
E Bruce Brooks
brooks@...
Nov 9, 2004 7:12 am
To: Synoptic-L In Response To: John Lupia On: Lk < Mt 5:39-48? From: Bruce Omitting as much as possible from previous messages: 1. [Lk om Mt 5:38 and similar...
9903
Jeffrey B. Gibson
jgibson000@...
Nov 10, 2004 2:28 am
Apologies for cross posting. I have lost a file in which I recorded the title, the bibliographic details, and the opening words of an article by E. Von...
9904
Karel Hanhart
k.hanhart@...
Nov 10, 2004 8:41 am
The only article I could think of is von Dobschutz: 'Mattaeus als Rabbi und Katechet', ZNW 27, 1928, 338ff. I donot have the article myself. It may be worth...
9905
John C. Poirier
poirier@...
Nov 11, 2004 2:36 pm
I recently read T. M. Derico's paper for the upcoming SBL meeting ("Upgrade and Reboot: A Reappraisal of the Default Setting"), and since it appears that I...
9906
Dana Ouellette
ouellette109@...
Nov 11, 2004 4:41 pm
In spite of Derico's constant criticism of Biblical scholars not understaning what orality is, i feel that Derico doesn't fully understand orality. He never...
9907
Mark Goodacre
goodacre@...
Nov 11, 2004 10:29 pm
I am interested by John and Dana's comments on Derico's paper. As I see it, the paper makes one important point: generalised appeals to "orality" are not...
9908
Jeffrey B. Gibson
jgibson000@...
Nov 11, 2004 11:21 pm
I'm pleased to announce that, thanks to help from Mark Goodacre, XTalk will soon be holding a Seminar with Gerd Ludemann, Professor of History and Literature...
9909
kaolson101
kenolson101@...
Nov 12, 2004 10:18 am
John, Dana and Mark, While I am in general agreement with the criticisms of Dericho's paper that the three of you have articulated, I think you are all being...
9910
John C. Poirier
poirier@...
Nov 12, 2004 12:20 pm
... His first name is Travis. ... Yes, yes, and yes. Why didn't I say that? I don't understand the reason for this sudden wave of scholars arguing to replace...
9911
E Bruce Brooks
brooks@...
Nov 12, 2004 1:04 pm
To: Synoptic-L In Response To: John Poirier On: The Derico SBL Paper From: Bruce John suggests four possible reasons for the tendencies observed by several in...
9912
John C. Poirier
poirier@...
Nov 12, 2004 2:47 pm
... Wow--if that's the case, it would certainly be a blow against the orality paradigm. I wonder who's carrying the Parry/Lord torch today in Homer studies...
9913
LeeEdgarTyler@...
Nov 12, 2004 6:19 pm
In a message dated 11/12/2004 8:41:06 AM Central Standard Time, poirier@... writes: ... Wow--if that's the case, it would certainly be a blow against...
9914
Charles Miller
CMiller@...
Nov 12, 2004 7:03 pm
For some dissenting views about the early demise of oral studies in relationship to Greek poetry, etc., there is the following: ...
9915
Jeffrey B. Gibson
jgibson000@...
Nov 14, 2004 2:36 pm
I am working on an article on the Sign of Jonah for the Synoptic Gospels section of the upcoming SBL and I'm wondering if anyone here can help me out with...
9916
Jeffrey B. Gibson
jgibson000@...
Nov 14, 2004 8:33 pm
With apologies for cross posting. Matthew presents the feeding of the 4000 (Matt. 15:32-39) as the occasion of his second account of the story of a demand for...
9917
Kym Smith
khs@...
Nov 15, 2004 10:07 am
Dear Jeffrey, I don't know if there were any extra-biblical Jewish traditions, which may be what you are looking for, but, given the association of demons and...
9918
Jeffrey B. Gibson
jgibson000@...
Nov 16, 2004 5:26 pm
With thanks to David Suter for pointing this out to me: 1QSa 2.6 excludes a number of categories of people from the congregation, including "everyone who is...
9919
John C. Poirier
poirier@...
Nov 16, 2004 5:50 pm
... Yes, the defiled *would* drive the angels away, but the more immediate reason for forbidding these people is simply that the Qumranites conceived of...
9920
Horace Jeffery Hodges
jefferyhodges@...
Nov 16, 2004 6:44 pm
... from the congregation, including "everyone who is defiled in his flesh, paralysed in his feet or in his hands, lame, blind, deaf, dumb or defiled in his...
9921
John Lupia
jlupia2@...
Nov 16, 2004 8:03 pm
The Qumran Community would marginalize this sect of infirm citizens and is in direct opposition and contrastive to the Gospel account and message. Where the...
9922
Tim Reynolds
molad@...
Nov 17, 2004 12:47 am
... You got that right. tim Synoptic-L Homepage: http://www.bham.ac.uk/theology/synoptic-l List Owner: Synoptic-L-Owner@......
9923
Tim Lewis
tlewistlewis@...
Nov 17, 2004 3:39 am
Mt’s Judgment expressions imply Q. E.g. here's the NT ‘Judgement Day’ Expressions (not including "on that day"): 1 Jn 4:17 "at the day of the judgment"...
9924
E Bruce Brooks
brooks@...
Nov 17, 2004 5:50 am
To: Synoptic-L In Response To: Tim Lewis On: Mt < Q From: Bruce Tim asks about how Mt 12:41-42 is to be understood, if not as momentarily reproducing the...
