With apologies for cross posting! This is the second notice of the annual gathering of Biblical and Biblical Studies E-Listers at the upcoming annual meeting...
Jeffrey B. Gibson
jgibson000@...
Nov 5, 2004 12:52 pm
9896
I would like to know if there is agreement amongst Farrer theorists about when a Mt-Lk parallel is (or is not) to be derived from Lukan dependence on Mt's...
Tim Lewis
tlewistlewis@...
Nov 6, 2004 3:11 am
9897
on 5/11/04 7:01 PM, Tim Lewis at tlewistlewis@... wrote: I would like to know if there is agreement amongst Farrer theorists about when a Mt-Lk...
Tim Reynolds
molad@...
Nov 7, 2004 5:00 am
9898
To: Synoptic-L In Response To: Tim Reynolds (on Tim Lewis' question) On: Lk's Treatment of Mt 5:39-48 From: Bruce TIM REYNOLDS: This whole class of cruces...
E Bruce Brooks
brooks@...
Nov 8, 2004 12:20 am
9899
To: Synoptic-L In Response To: Tim Lewis On: Mt 5:3[8]-48 || Lk 6:27-36 From: Bruce What the certified Farrer Theorists would say, we will know when all five...
E Bruce Brooks
brooks@...
Nov 8, 2004 10:50 am
9900
... Perhaps Luke does not omit at all, and that it is Matthew who writes "you have heard that it was said" referring to Luke's Gospel that he (Matthew)based...
John Lupia
jlupia2@...
Nov 8, 2004 4:04 pm
9901
Good question. Let me jump in with my own tentative reply, and I would like to see how other Farrer-type people respond. First, I would think that Luke knew of...
Matson, Mark (Academic)
MAMatson@...
Nov 8, 2004 5:02 pm
9902
To: Synoptic-L In Response To: John Lupia On: Lk < Mt 5:39-48? From: Bruce Omitting as much as possible from previous messages: 1. [Lk om Mt 5:38 and similar...
E Bruce Brooks
brooks@...
Nov 9, 2004 7:12 am
9903
Apologies for cross posting. I have lost a file in which I recorded the title, the bibliographic details, and the opening words of an article by E. Von...
Jeffrey B. Gibson
jgibson000@...
Nov 10, 2004 2:28 am
9904
The only article I could think of is von Dobschutz: 'Mattaeus als Rabbi und Katechet', ZNW 27, 1928, 338ff. I donot have the article myself. It may be worth...
Karel Hanhart
k.hanhart@...
Nov 10, 2004 8:41 am
9905
I recently read T. M. Derico's paper for the upcoming SBL meeting ("Upgrade and Reboot: A Reappraisal of the Default Setting"), and since it appears that I...
John C. Poirier
poirier@...
Nov 11, 2004 2:36 pm
9906
In spite of Derico's constant criticism of Biblical scholars not understaning what orality is, i feel that Derico doesn't fully understand orality. He never...
Dana Ouellette
ouellette109@...
Nov 11, 2004 4:41 pm
9907
I am interested by John and Dana's comments on Derico's paper. As I see it, the paper makes one important point: generalised appeals to "orality" are not...
Mark Goodacre
goodacre@...
Nov 11, 2004 10:29 pm
9908
I'm pleased to announce that, thanks to help from Mark Goodacre, XTalk will soon be holding a Seminar with Gerd Ludemann, Professor of History and Literature...
Jeffrey B. Gibson
jgibson000@...
Nov 11, 2004 11:21 pm
9909
John, Dana and Mark, While I am in general agreement with the criticisms of Dericho's paper that the three of you have articulated, I think you are all being...
kaolson101
kenolson101@...
Nov 12, 2004 10:18 am
9910
... His first name is Travis. ... Yes, yes, and yes. Why didn't I say that? I don't understand the reason for this sudden wave of scholars arguing to replace...
John C. Poirier
poirier@...
Nov 12, 2004 12:20 pm
9911
To: Synoptic-L In Response To: John Poirier On: The Derico SBL Paper From: Bruce John suggests four possible reasons for the tendencies observed by several in...
E Bruce Brooks
brooks@...
Nov 12, 2004 1:04 pm
9912
... Wow--if that's the case, it would certainly be a blow against the orality paradigm. I wonder who's carrying the Parry/Lord torch today in Homer studies...
John C. Poirier
poirier@...
Nov 12, 2004 2:47 pm
9913
In a message dated 11/12/2004 8:41:06 AM Central Standard Time, poirier@... writes: ... Wow--if that's the case, it would certainly be a blow against...
LeeEdgarTyler@...
Nov 12, 2004 6:19 pm
9914
For some dissenting views about the early demise of oral studies in relationship to Greek poetry, etc., there is the following: ...
Charles Miller
CMiller@...
Nov 12, 2004 7:03 pm
9915
I am working on an article on the Sign of Jonah for the Synoptic Gospels section of the upcoming SBL and I'm wondering if anyone here can help me out with...
Jeffrey B. Gibson
jgibson000@...
Nov 14, 2004 2:36 pm
9916
With apologies for cross posting. Matthew presents the feeding of the 4000 (Matt. 15:32-39) as the occasion of his second account of the story of a demand for...
Jeffrey B. Gibson
jgibson000@...
Nov 14, 2004 8:33 pm
9917
Dear Jeffrey, I don't know if there were any extra-biblical Jewish traditions, which may be what you are looking for, but, given the association of demons and...
Kym Smith
khs@...
Nov 15, 2004 10:07 am
9918
With thanks to David Suter for pointing this out to me: 1QSa 2.6 excludes a number of categories of people from the congregation, including "everyone who is...
Jeffrey B. Gibson
jgibson000@...
Nov 16, 2004 5:26 pm
9919
... Yes, the defiled *would* drive the angels away, but the more immediate reason for forbidding these people is simply that the Qumranites conceived of...
John C. Poirier
poirier@...
Nov 16, 2004 5:50 pm
9920
... from the congregation, including "everyone who is defiled in his flesh, paralysed in his feet or in his hands, lame, blind, deaf, dumb or defiled in his...
Horace Jeffery Hodges
jefferyhodges@...
Nov 16, 2004 6:44 pm
9921
The Qumran Community would marginalize this sect of infirm citizens and is in direct opposition and contrastive to the Gospel account and message. Where the...
John Lupia
jlupia2@...
Nov 16, 2004 8:03 pm
9922
... You got that right. tim Synoptic-L Homepage: http://www.bham.ac.uk/theology/synoptic-l List Owner: Synoptic-L-Owner@......
Tim Reynolds
molad@...
Nov 17, 2004 12:47 am
9923
Mt’s Judgment expressions imply Q. E.g. here's the NT ‘Judgement Day’ Expressions (not including "on that day"): 1 Jn 4:17 "at the day of the judgment"...
Tim Lewis
tlewistlewis@...
Nov 17, 2004 3:39 am
9924
To: Synoptic-L In Response To: Tim Lewis On: Mt < Q From: Bruce Tim asks about how Mt 12:41-42 is to be understood, if not as momentarily reproducing the...