Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
synoptic-l · Synoptic-L (Archive 1998-2005)
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Message search is now enhanced, find messages faster. Take it for a spin.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Messages 9310 - 9339 of 10247   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Messages: Simplify | Expand   (Group by Topic) Author Sort by Date ^
9310
At Mark 8:33 Mark has Jesus rebuke Peter and call him Satan because Peter has shown himself with respect to his disdain for a Messiah who suffers to be...
Jeffrey B. Gibson
jgibson000@...
Send Email
Oct 2, 2003
11:45 pm
9311
Apologies for cross posting! It's that time of year again when the annual Society of Biblical Literature meeting is just round the corner (Nov. 22nd-Nov. 25th)...
Jeffrey B. Gibson
jgibson000@...
Send Email
Oct 2, 2003
11:53 pm
9312
... It seems like a tough case to make. I'd rather attempt to connect 8:33 with 10:27 because both contrast God with humans. Stephen Carlson -- Stephen C....
Stephen C. Carlson
scarlson@...
Send Email
Oct 3, 2003
7:21 am
9313
... I don't see it. Does anyone else see it? ... Check. He established the church in Alexandria in the 40s, attended the 62 convocation in Jerusalem...
Tim Reynolds
molad@...
Send Email
Oct 3, 2003
9:40 pm
9314
... From: Tim Reynolds <molad@...> To: Karel Hanhart <k.hanhart@...>; Ken Olson <kaolson@...>; Synoptic-L <Synoptic-L@...> ...
Karel Hanhart
k.hanhart@...
Send Email
Oct 4, 2003
7:07 pm
9315
... I'm just displaying my ignorance. Thanks. ... A considerable body of Coptic material on the Internet puts Mark's lynching in 68. Hence the abruupt...
Tim Reynolds
molad@...
Send Email
Oct 4, 2003
10:33 pm
9316
... From: Tim Reynolds <molad@...> To: Karel Hanhart <k.hanhart@...>; Ken Olson <kaolson@...>; Synoptic-L <Synoptic-L@...> ...
Karel Hanhart
k.hanhart@...
Send Email
Oct 6, 2003
2:32 pm
9317
... I'm not doing exegesis, I'm doing history. ... Texts. We don't read them differently, but yes, I have found the Markan priority switch gets me to town. ...
Tim Reynolds
molad@...
Send Email
Oct 6, 2003
10:13 pm
9318
I know there's not much of it, but does anyone ever use the term "Special Mark" to describe material solely in Mark? Or does anyone ever talk about Marcan...
Mark Goodacre
M.S.Goodacre@...
Send Email
Oct 7, 2003
1:14 pm
9319
I've used the term "Special Mark" occasionally, although I can't remember if I've done so in anything I've published. I might be a little wary of the term now,...
Thomas R. W. Longstaff
tlongst@...
Send Email
Oct 7, 2003
2:07 pm
9320
Thomas R. W. Longstaff: “we need to give more consideration to the creative activity of the authors. It seems to me that even when they are using sources,...
John Lupia
jlupia2@...
Send Email
Oct 7, 2003
4:45 pm
9321
With apologies for cross posting -- but I'd really like to engage as many minds as possible as quickly as possible on the question below. Recent writers on the...
Jeffrey B. Gibson
jgibson000@...
Send Email
Oct 7, 2003
8:06 pm
9322
Dear Mark, I have come across the term in Udo Schnelle _The History and Theology of the New Testament Writings_, p. 169: *The Markan texts that do not appear...
Daniel Grolin
dgrolin@...
Send Email
Oct 7, 2003
9:22 pm
9323
I wonder if scholars who hold Markan priority are hesitant to look at the special Markan material as a whole (and therefore hesitant to name it as a whole),...
Maluflen@...
Send Email
Oct 8, 2003
12:29 am
9324
... Daniel and Mark, On the contrary, Schnelle does not support the classic Two Source Theory. He has a modified version which includes a "Deuteromark" amongst...
Ron Price
ron.price@...
Send Email
Oct 8, 2003
7:44 am
9325
Thanks to all for their comments on this, especially the reference to Schnelle. ... Speaking for myself, the special Mark material is one of the reasons I am...
Mark Goodacre
M.S.Goodacre@...
Send Email
Oct 8, 2003
9:24 am
9326
Let me provide a bit more context for my question. I have been thinking about J. P. Meier's comments on the relationship between the Gospel of Thomas and the...
Mark Goodacre
M.S.Goodacre@...
Send Email
Oct 8, 2003
9:43 am
9327
... I'm generally pretty sympathetic with Meier and others on this one. But the LukeR and MattR parallels are the crucial ones if they can be made to stick ...
Peter M. Head
pmh15@...
Send Email
Oct 8, 2003
11:41 am
9328
At 08:23 PM 10/7/03 -0400, Maluflen@... wrote: I wonder if scholars who hold Markan priority are hesitant to look at the special Markan material as a whole...
Peter M. Head
pmh15@...
Send Email
Oct 8, 2003
11:43 am
9329
Dear Ron, * On the contrary, Schnelle does not support the classic Two Source Theory. He has a modified version which includes a "Deuteromark" amongst other ...
Daniel Grolin
dgrolin@...
Send Email
Oct 8, 2003
12:39 pm
9330
Actually, Peter, members of the International Institute for the Renewal of Gospel Studies, including Bill Farmer, utilized a careful analysis of the so-called...
David Barrett Peabody
dbpeabody@...
Send Email
Oct 8, 2003
12:45 pm
9331
In a message dated 10/8/2003 2:23:59 AM Pacific Daylight Time, ... I suspect that a distinction is in order here. Mark, I assume you are thinking primarily of...
Maluflen@...
Send Email
Oct 8, 2003
2:21 pm
9332
I think there are of a couple of possible ways to explain that in general. 1) Thomas knew the other gospels. 2) Thomas comes to us fairly directly from an...
David Gentile
GentDave@...
Send Email
Oct 8, 2003
2:47 pm
9333
... Daniel, True. ... Indeed, and part of his reason for this is the supposed difficulty in explaining why on the 2ST Matt and Luke independently decided to...
Ron Price
ron.price@...
Send Email
Oct 8, 2003
5:44 pm
9334
The recent postings on GTh have reminded me of a posting which I prepared some months ago but never got round to sending, so here it is. Point (7) is similar...
Ron Price
ron.price@...
Send Email
Oct 8, 2003
7:05 pm
9335
Dear Ron, ... I stand corrected. It seems to me that makes the use of that term even more more interesting. Regards, Daniel ...
Daniel Grolin
dgrolin@...
Send Email
Oct 8, 2003
7:55 pm
9336
David Gentile <GentDave@...> wrote: <[T]here are of a couple of possible ways to explain that in general. 1) Thomas knew the other gospels. 2) ...
Horace Jeffery Hodges
jefferyhodges@...
Send Email
Oct 8, 2003
9:25 pm
9337
David Gentile <GentDave@...> wrote: <[T]here are of a couple of possible ways to explain that in general. 1) Thomas knew the other gospels. 2) ...
Horace Jeffery Hodges
jefferyhodges@...
Send Email
Oct 8, 2003
9:28 pm
9338
... Yes, it's the thesis of Nicholas Perrin, _Thomas and Tatian: The Relationship Between the Gospel of Thomas and the Diatessaron_ (Academia Biblica, 5;...
Mark Goodacre
M.S.Goodacre@...
Send Email
Oct 8, 2003
10:44 pm
9339
Thanks for helping me to think this through. ... Who are the others? Blomberg also makes this point; I can't remember if Snodgrass does. ... It's tough...
Mark Goodacre
M.S.Goodacre@...
Send Email
Oct 8, 2003
11:14 pm
Messages 9310 - 9339 of 10247   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Advanced
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help