Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
synoptic-l · Synoptic-L (Archive 1998-2005)
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Want to share photos of your group with the world? Add a group photo to Flickr.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Messages 8608 - 8637 of 10247   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Messages: Simplify | Expand   (Group by Topic) Author Sort by Date ^
8608
In a message dated 7/31/2002 2:03:33 PM Pacific Daylight Time, ... But, as you describe it, it is no longer "Luke's" FULASSW, but that of his source. What is...
Maluflen@...
Send Email
Aug 1, 2002
10:13 am
8609
... Leonard, It's not quite so simple. I am positing an Aramaic source which Luke would have had to translate. In this scenario Luke chose FULASSW to represent...
Ron Price
ron.price@...
Send Email
Aug 1, 2002
9:27 pm
8610
This is an answer to an old mail of Ken, about some quotes of Streeter. I think that you are forcing quite a bit the comparison between p. 83 and p. 212 of...
Emmanuel Fritsch
emmanuel.fritsch@...
Send Email
Aug 2, 2002
5:04 pm
8611
I read with interest the discussion between Ken Olson and Ron Price about Luke omission, and I would like to ask them about a strange characteristic of Lukan...
Emmanuel Fritsch
emmanuel.fritsch@...
Send Email
Aug 2, 2002
5:21 pm
8612
... Emmanuel, If in a given pericope Luke was using Mark, then if we subtract the Markan content what remains is Luke's additions. I agree in general that we...
Ron Price
ron.price@...
Send Email
Aug 3, 2002
4:25 pm
8613
... Emmanuel, ... I had assumed from this that you were prepared to argue your case for an extra source on the basis of Markan priority. If this is not so,...
Ron Price
ron.price@...
Send Email
Aug 5, 2002
6:38 am
8614
Conclusion of this discussion with Ron Price, The only arguments against proto-Luke is an argument of economy : "why is it needed to assume an unknown document...
Emmanuel Fritsch
emmanuel.fritsch@...
Send Email
Aug 5, 2002
9:41 am
8615
... I think not, because he claims (in the book refered here after) that he was leaded by a matthew-priority a priori. It looks as if he has been convinced...
Emmanuel Fritsch
emmanuel.fritsch@...
Send Email
Aug 5, 2002
2:10 pm
8616
... Emmanuel, No. That is not what I meant (see below). ... Then there should be linguistic evidence that the parts which don't overlap with Mark do not have...
Ron Price
ron.price@...
Send Email
Aug 5, 2002
9:10 pm
8617
... Might not these verses come from the same source as 1.5-2.52? We already know (pace Griesbach) that this source can override Mk, and both sequences run to...
Tim Reynolds
molad@...
Send Email
Aug 5, 2002
9:11 pm
8618
I wrote and Ron Price answered : (discussions on details are rejected in PS) ... * Have you a better denomination than 'Luke minus Mark' ? If not, then let us...
Emmanuel Fritsch
emmanuel.fritsch@...
Send Email
Aug 6, 2002
1:20 pm
8619
Emmanuel, Thanks for the interesting remarks about Solages. They will be helpful. As Solages is apparently the first one to do a full-length statistical...
John C. Poirier
poirier@...
Send Email
Aug 6, 2002
1:41 pm
8620
... Emmanuel, You are being hyper-critical here. You introduced the term 'Luke minus Mark'. ... I wrote "might have written", implying a lack of definite...
Ron Price
ron.price@...
Send Email
Aug 7, 2002
7:05 am
8621
Ron, ... I am not sure I understand your views : 'Luke minus Mark' is the image of a text, which was something between a Lukan rough draft, a set of Jesus...
Emmanuel Fritsch
emmanuel.fritsch@...
Send Email
Aug 7, 2002
9:47 am
8622
Emmanuel, This discussion is getting quite difficult. I am misunderstanding some of your attempts at English, and you are misunderstanding some of my correct...
Ron Price
ron.price@...
Send Email
Aug 8, 2002
5:35 pm
8623
Ron, I apologize for my bad level in english. I apologize also for the mix of different problems, that produces in this thread interferences in the discussion....
Emmanuel Fritsch
emmanuel.fritsch@...
Send Email
Aug 9, 2002
3:54 pm
8624
... Emmanuel, I already did, as you noted above. 'Luke minus Mark for Lk 21:20-28' is interesting, but we can't be sure that it has any significance at all. ...
Ron Price
ron.price@...
Send Email
Aug 10, 2002
3:08 pm
8625
Ron, A] Luke minus Mark for Lk 21:20-28 ... We may say also: "The similarity between Luke, Mark and Matthew is interesting, but we can't be sure that it has...
Emmanuel Fritsch
emmanuel.fritsch@...
Send Email
Aug 12, 2002
5:16 pm
8626
... Emmanuel, ... In other words he thought it up himself (in order to make the text a better match with the events which occurred at the Fall of Jerusalem). ...
Ron Price
ron.price@...
Send Email
Aug 13, 2002
5:13 pm
8627
The thesis Mark radically revised a pre-70 gospel is relevant to the exchange between Ron and Manu cited below re Lk 21,20-28. I based the thesis on a lengthy ...
Karel Hanhart
K.Hanhart@...
Send Email
Aug 13, 2002
8:46 pm
8628
Ron, ... RP: ... EF: And then I wanted to use the rough draft as a kind of document, and you answered that since you said "Luke MIGHT have written out a rough...
archeboc
Emmanuel.Fritsch@...
Send Email
Aug 14, 2002
6:56 am
8629
... Emmanuel, (by the way, I address you thus because I don't understand your signature: "a+ manu". If a+ is short for adieu, then it might be better to spell...
Ron Price
ron.price@...
Send Email
Aug 15, 2002
1:23 pm
8630
Since Ron want to reserve his arguments for publication, this discussion is soon arrived to its end. ... If you do not think that "Luke might have written a ...
Emmanuel Fritsch
emmanuel.fritsch@...
Send Email
Aug 23, 2002
5:57 pm
8631
This discussion is not getting anywhere, but rather is tending to go round in circles. I will try to summarize the root of our differences. ... Emmanuel et...
Ron Price
ron.price@...
Send Email
Aug 25, 2002
3:46 pm
8632
... I gave some objections about that implausible scenario and your other arguments (for instance your criteria). You answered with general considerations, but...
Emmanuel Fritsch
emmanuel.fritsch@...
Send Email
Aug 27, 2002
8:30 am
8633
I've just written (for a current project) that "Morgenthaler was the first to recognize the importance of verbal sequence in calculating the amount of verbatim...
John C. Poirier
poirier@...
Send Email
Sep 6, 2002
3:00 pm
8634
I assume you mean: MORGENTHALER, R., Statistik des neutestamentlichen Wortschatzes, Zürich/Frankfurt am Main, 1958, 41992; Statistische Synopse,...
John Lupia
jlupia2@...
Send Email
Sep 6, 2002
3:36 pm
8635
In the light of a retrospective look at the last six months, I would like to formulate the following historical hypothesis, and to solicit the critique, ...
Maluflen@...
Send Email
Sep 12, 2002
1:09 pm
8636
Interesting question, Leonard. I've been so busy with two articles plus reviews that I hadn't noticed that the Synoptic List was quiet. I had noticed the ...
Horace Jeffery Hodges
jefferyhodges@...
Send Email
Sep 12, 2002
10:34 pm
8637
... Response by Karel Hanhart: In previous exchanges we also discussed the problems of "the twelve" and of "Judas Iscariot". However, thus far - in this...
Karel Hanhart
K.Hanhart@...
Send Email
Sep 13, 2002
8:32 am
Messages 8608 - 8637 of 10247   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Advanced
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help