Very interesting review by John Kloppenborg of Dale Allison's book, 'The Intertextual Jesus: Scripture in Q' in the latest email Review of Biblical Literature:...
Jacob Knee
jknee@...
Nov 1, 2001 8:13 am
6851
... I have a long review article in the current issue of Tyndale Bulletin 52.2 (2001), pp. 275-294, under the title: 'The Role of Eyewitnesses in the Formation...
Peter M. Head
pmh15@...
Nov 1, 2001 11:44 am
6852
... Your point is good and valid for the general case, especially in regard to classical works whose preservation depended on Christian scribes at the end of...
Stephen C. Carlson
scarlson@...
Nov 1, 2001 1:43 pm
6853
Ed raises an excellent point, but there is a chief difference between these cases and that of a hypothetical gospel. That difference is that other authors...
L. J. Swain
larry.swain@...
Nov 1, 2001 2:30 pm
6854
In a message dated 11/1/2001 6:37:27 AM Eastern Standard Time, pmh15@... writes: << I have a long review article in the current issue of Tyndale...
Maluflen@...
Nov 1, 2001 2:33 pm
6855
In a message dated 10/31/2001 10:43:26 PM Eastern Standard Time, LeeEdgarTyler@... writes: [Responding to Stephen Carlson who wrote:] << You've pretty much...
Maluflen@...
Nov 1, 2001 2:54 pm
6856
... David Landry has made some useful comments on this, and I appreciate your subsequent response. I'd just add in relation to the source-critical issue that...
Mark Goodacre
M.S.Goodacre@...
Nov 1, 2001 4:19 pm
6857
... A quick comment on the latter: I'd say Fuchs appeals to Deutero- Markus not so much in order to maintain Marcan Priority generally but to maintain Marcan...
Mark Goodacre
M.S.Goodacre@...
Nov 1, 2001 4:21 pm
6858
Another thought... I wonder how many copies of Mark existed by, let's say, 130 BCE? More than three I bet. How many have been utterly lost to history! -- Steve...
Steve Black
sblack@...
Nov 1, 2001 4:44 pm
6859
In a message dated 11/1/2001 8:11:52 AM Central Standard Time, ... Of course the Acta Senatus and the Acta Diurna were more than merely "popular" immediately...
LeeEdgarTyler@...
Nov 1, 2001 4:45 pm
6860
... altogether. ... My scenario does NOT really see "deutero-Mark" as a distinct gospel; it would have been seen merely as another *copy* of the one gospel ...
Steve Black
sblack@...
Nov 1, 2001 4:45 pm
6861
In a message dated 11/1/2001 11:40:41 AM Eastern Standard Time, sblack@... writes: << Another thought... I wonder how many copies of Mark existed by,...
Maluflen@...
Nov 1, 2001 5:52 pm
6862
In a message dated 10/31/2001 7:43:15 PM Eastern Standard Time, Maluflen@... writes: << Diegesis means not only narrative but also exposition. Luke doesn't...
Maluflen@...
Nov 1, 2001 6:12 pm
6863
... It kinda does turn my theory into a rather peculiar one, doesn't it! Rewind---Erase---record, "130 *CE*" -- Steve Black Vancouver, BC Synoptic-L Homepage:...
Steve Black
sblack@...
Nov 1, 2001 6:12 pm
6864
Emmanuel Fritsch wrote -- ... Emmanuel, I did not understand this was what you meant in your previous contribution. The term "reverse hypothesis" is used...
Brian E. Wilson
brian@...
Nov 1, 2001 7:14 pm
6865
David Gentile wrote (in defence of his theory which posits two lost ... Dave, A generalized claim like this is not as convincing as a record of a specific...
Ron Price
ron.price@...
Nov 1, 2001 7:59 pm
6866
... Emmanuel, Absolutely right. I'm confident that he was attesting Mark and Matthew. ... But we can't be sure that there were any more than two. My view is...
Ron Price
ron.price@...
Nov 1, 2001 7:59 pm
6867
... Emmanuel, Yes, Luke evidently liked the word METANOIA. At (Mt 2; Mk 1; Lk 5), it just falls short of qualifying as a Lukanism on Hawkins' rather strict ...
Ron Price
ron.price@...
Nov 1, 2001 8:07 pm
6868
... copies ... I think this is another example of the anti-supernaturalist bias that dominates liberal NT studies. If we would just let go of our unproven ...
Ken Olson
kaolson@...
Nov 1, 2001 9:23 pm
6869
Ron Price wrote: I don't know what you count as "major". How about Mk 4:21 // Lk 8:16 with no Matthean equivalent in his redaction of Mark? ...
David Gentile
GentDave@...
Nov 2, 2001 3:44 am
6870
In reviewing my hypothesis, and comparing to others, I've asked myself what I see differently than others here. I think relative to others, I am less inclined...
David Gentile
GentDave@...
Nov 2, 2001 3:44 am
6871
In a message dated 11/1/2001 2:00:26 PM Eastern Standard Time, brian@... writes: <<Emmanuel, I did not understand this was what you meant in your...
Maluflen@...
Nov 2, 2001 4:08 am
6872
Just a minor correction to my last message. About seventeen (not six) per cent of the words of Mk are triple tradition words. That is 1889 out of 11267. I...
Brian E. Wilson
brian@...
Nov 2, 2001 9:12 am
6873
... Is it not possible to say that "in order", for Luke, means in fact "in an order", ie Luke means that several documents for the different tradition about...
Emmanuel Fritsch
emmanuel.fritsch@...
Nov 2, 2001 12:39 pm
6874
... It seems to me that there are, indeed, good reasons to suppose that the authors would omit material. 1. It can be demonstrated that authors, other than the...
Thomas R. W. Longstaff
tlongst@...
Nov 2, 2001 12:54 pm
6875
... I am sorry to not be a scholar, and to ignore Hawkins' criterion. May you say me what it is ? ... It is not surprising to find the METANOIA thema here,...
Emmanuel Fritsch
emmanuel.fritsch@...
Nov 2, 2001 3:55 pm
6876
... My question was not good. In fact, what is interesting is the number of composite dua-stories in the LT. For instance, the triple tradition dua-story...
Emmanuel Fritsch
emmanuel.fritsch@...
Nov 2, 2001 4:00 pm
6877
... In that case, you should be more combative against Mk 1:4 as a proof of Mark knowing Luke ;-) ... Why only two ? When he says many, how may you be sure it...
Emmanuel Fritsch
emmanuel.fritsch@...
Nov 2, 2001 4:32 pm
6878
... I do not remember anyone adressing the last question, which looks really interesting. In fact, in the second mail of the thread Stephen Carlson ackowledges...
Emmanuel Fritsch
emmanuel.fritsch@...
Nov 2, 2001 4:40 pm
6879
Dr. Thomas R. W. Longstaff wrote: =========== It seems to me that there are, indeed, good reasons to suppose that the authors would omit material. =========== ...
Having problems with message search?
Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.
