Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
synoptic-l · Synoptic-L (Archive 1998-2005)
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Message search is now enhanced, find messages faster. Take it for a spin.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Messages 6418 - 6447 of 10247   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Messages: Simplify | Expand   (Group by Topic) Author Sort by Date ^
6418
To Brian Wilson and other Listers: Brian Wilson, on Monday, June 25, 2001 2:02 AM, wrote in response to my ... My response; Thank you, Brian for reading my...
Ted Weeden
weedent@...
Send Email
Jul 1, 2001
5:23 pm
6419
Peter Kirby ask: So what is the evidence that ties Luke and Acts together as the work of single author? Contrarily, is there any internal evidence that would...
Richard Anderson
randerson58@...
Send Email
Jul 2, 2001
12:29 am
6420
Peter Kirby, ... of single author? Contrarily, is there any internal evidence that would render them asunder or suggest a revision of Luke by the author of...
David C. Hindley
dhindley@...
Send Email
Jul 2, 2001
2:53 am
6421
Ted Weeden wrote -- ... Ted, Such an analysis is equally possible on the assumption that all three synoptists used a common source, that Mark most faithfully ...
Brian E. Wilson
brian@...
Send Email
Jul 2, 2001
7:20 am
6422
Ted Weeden wrote -- ... Brian Wilson replied -- ... Ted Weedon responded -- ... Ted, I could do this, though I would not claim to have incontrovertible ...
Brian E. Wilson
brian@...
Send Email
Jul 2, 2001
11:10 pm
6423
Just to make a CORRECTION to my previous posting -- I wrote -- ... This should have been -- ... Sorry about this slip (made at 23.58 -- just before midnight...
Brian E. Wilson
brian@...
Send Email
Jul 3, 2001
6:51 am
6424
To Brian Wilson: Brian, I am trying to understand what you find is missing in my argument for the Matthean and Lukan dependence on canonical Mark, which...
Ted Weeden
weedent@...
Send Email
Jul 3, 2001
1:23 pm
6425
Synoptic-L@... ... the ... Ted, Rev. Brian Wilson is far from being alone about this. You correctly stated: "In my post I provided evidence that I find...
John Lupia
jlupia2@...
Send Email
Jul 3, 2001
5:41 pm
6426
Ted Weeden wrote -- ... Ted, What you have missed is that although your arguments do indeed rule out the priority of Matthew and do indeed rule out the...
Brian E. Wilson
brian@...
Send Email
Jul 3, 2001
6:43 pm
6427
... I am not clear why you have brought up that discussion in this context. Indeed quoting it out of its context there generates a misleading impression...
Mark Goodacre
M.S.Goodacre@...
Send Email
Jul 3, 2001
7:10 pm
6428
... Synoptic-L@... From: John Lupia To: List Please note that the quotation does not accurately report what Mark Goodacre said -- the final sentence...
John Lupia
jlupia2@...
Send Email
Jul 3, 2001
8:54 pm
6429
The following message bounced. Mark ... To: Synoptic-L@... From: Michael Grondin <mgrondin@...> Subject: Re: GTHOM ... Apologies for this belated...
Mark Goodacre
M.S.Goodacre@...
Send Email
Jul 4, 2001
7:37 am
6430
I am looking for suggestions as to what to look for regarding works on GMatthew. If any one would be willing to submit a select bibliography including two or...
Steve Black
sblack@...
Send Email
Jul 5, 2001
7:57 pm
6431
Steve Black wrote: If any one would be willing to submit a select ... I've found most helpful: Paul S. Minear, MATTHEW: THE TEACHER'S GOSPEL (out of print) ...
Jeff Peterson
peterson@...
Send Email
Jul 5, 2001
10:29 pm
6432
... I have had a similar reaction, in slightly different terms. I have a good feel for Mark's plot and sense of characterization, and a good feel for Luke's...
Shawn J. Kelley
skelley@...
Send Email
Jul 5, 2001
10:30 pm
6433
... John, It does not help to advance scholarly dialogue or contribute to the spirit of colleagiality among scholars to dismiss summarily and curtly a...
Ted Weeden
weedent@...
Send Email
Jul 5, 2001
10:37 pm
6434
... (Snipped text) ... My response: Brian, given all the extant sources that we have, I have presented empirical evidence that on its own merits...
Ted Weeden
weedent@...
Send Email
Jul 5, 2001
10:38 pm
6435
... I have a bibliography available for first year undergraduates in the section on "course materials" at: http://www.bham.ac.uk/theology/goodacre/bibstud ...
Mark Goodacre
M.S.Goodacre@...
Send Email
Jul 5, 2001
11:20 pm
6436
... The difficulty with the Bauckham book, which I love, is that it really is only a beginning point and stops short of many of the interesting nitty-gritty...
Mark Goodacre
M.S.Goodacre@...
Send Email
Jul 5, 2001
11:32 pm
6437
In a message dated 7/5/2001 6:17:23 PM Eastern Daylight Time, peterson@... writes: << Apropos a subject that's been previously discussed on the list,...
Maluflen@...
Send Email
Jul 6, 2001
12:54 am
6438
... I would understand Clement of Alexandria to feel same way, because he contrasted the open publication of Matthew and Luke with the more limited...
Stephen C. Carlson
scarlson@...
Send Email
Jul 6, 2001
1:12 am
6439
In a message dated 7/5/2001 7:27:11 PM Eastern Daylight Time, M.S.Goodacre@... writes: << My own tentative view is that Matthew is Jewish Christian ...
Maluflen@...
Send Email
Jul 6, 2001
1:16 am
6440
In a message dated 6/18/2001 4:11:32 PM Eastern Daylight Time, brian@... writes: << The saying "Your faith has saved you", using the second...
Maluflen@...
Send Email
Jul 6, 2001
1:30 am
6441
Firstly, thanks all for the various recommendations. ... By this, do you mean that you believe that Matthew was primarily written evangelistically - to win...
Steve Black
sblack@...
Send Email
Jul 6, 2001
1:50 am
6442
I fail to see how my posting in Synoptic-L archive Number 6425 is appropriately addressed in Ted Weeden's response in archive number 6433. You are begging the...
John Lupia
JLupia2@...
Send Email
Jul 6, 2001
7:44 am
6443
I accidently wrote: Second, could you be so kind as to explain how 1000 minor agreements between Matthew and Mark When it should read: Second, could you be so...
John Lupia
JLupia2@...
Send Email
Jul 6, 2001
7:47 am
6444
... I am curious to know what it is about the Minor Agreements between Matthew and Luke against Mark that for you calls Marcan Priority into question. I am...
Mark Goodacre
M.S.Goodacre@...
Send Email
Jul 6, 2001
8:53 am
6445
... No, not necessarily. Though I wouldn't want to rule out the thought that it was used "evangelistically", I wonder whether Matthew is attempting to...
Mark Goodacre
M.S.Goodacre@...
Send Email
Jul 6, 2001
9:17 am
6446
... What do you understand by "re-Judaizing Mark". I realize that many don't wish to identify the author of the second Gospel. Their assessment: they simply...
Karel Hanhart
K.Hanhart@...
Send Email
Jul 6, 2001
10:29 am
6447
In a message dated 7/6/2001 6:23:55 AM Eastern Daylight Time, K.Hanhart@... writes: << The term re-Judaizing isn't a happy one, since Mark could well...
Maluflen@...
Send Email
Jul 6, 2001
11:23 am
Messages 6418 - 6447 of 10247   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Advanced
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help