... If you could eliminate the possibility that dependence of A and B on a common source as unlikely, then I would agree with you that the presence of A's...
Stephen C. Carlson
scarlson@...
Mar 1, 2001 12:12 pm
5747
In a message dated 2/28/2001 6:06:30 PM Eastern Standard Time, poirier@... writes: << Unfortunately, I did not look for Markan redaction in Matthew. In...
Maluflen@...
Mar 1, 2001 12:32 pm
5748
Stephen Carlson wrote -- ... Stephen, Thanks for raising what I think is an extremely important issue. I hope you will not consider that I am quibbling, but I...
Brian E. Wilson
brian@...
Mar 1, 2001 1:01 pm
5749
In a message dated 3/1/2001 7:54:08 AM Eastern Standard Time, brian@... writes: << I also wonder whether perhaps the word "probably" should...
Maluflen@...
Mar 1, 2001 3:00 pm
5750
... Stephen, Perhaps I didn't make myself clear. I'll have to resort to an example. Suppose we come across a novel by an unknown author with no indication of...
Ron Price
ron.price@...
Mar 1, 2001 9:26 pm
5751
I just noticed in Kloppenburg's "Excavating Q" on p.46 in footnote 58 he mentions Boismard 1972. This simplified version of Boismard is almost exactly the same...
dgentil@...
Mar 1, 2001 11:04 pm
5752
Stephen Carlson wrote: I would suggest that the burden of proof belongs to one asserting that there is a indirect dependence on a common source. This is ...
dgentil@...
Mar 1, 2001 11:15 pm
5753
... My use of the prepositional phrase "on a common source" was intended to be epexegetical, with basically the same meaning as you proposed. (It occurs to me...
Stephen C. Carlson
scarlson@...
Mar 2, 2001 4:40 am
5754
... It seems to me that all three options are possible. The main thing going for option (2) is that Star Trek was disseminated very widely and the novel was...
Stephen C. Carlson
scarlson@...
Mar 2, 2001 4:47 am
5755
... to ... to ... always ... Dear Leonard: I'm no longer convinced that Matthew is (necessarily) the last of the synoptic gospels to be written. As to whether...
John C. Poirier
poirier@...
Mar 2, 2001 11:40 am
5756
Brian Wilson wrote -- ... Stephen Carlson replied to this -- ... Stephen, I think, to be fair to Casey, we should note that throughout his book he consistently...
Brian E. Wilson
brian@...
Mar 2, 2001 12:00 pm
5757
Brian Wilson wrote -- ... Joe Alward replied -- ... Joe, A very good question! That is, presuming you mean the OT in Hebrew. It is significant that each...
Brian E. Wilson
brian@...
Mar 2, 2001 12:10 pm
5758
... Stephen, But there is other evidence that Luke knew Matthew, evidence which is completely independent of the claimed Mattheanisms: "weeping and gnashing of...
Ron Price
ron.price@...
Mar 2, 2001 12:23 pm
5759
Answer to Peter Kirby : # My theory is that the author of Luke did not believe in the virgin birth. Boismard dedicates an ex-cursus to this point of view in...
Emmanuel Fritsch
Emmanuel.Fritsch@...
Mar 2, 2001 1:55 pm
5760
... From: "Brian E. Wilson" <brian@...> To: <Synoptic-L@...> Sent: Friday, March 02, 2001 3:50 AM Subject: [Synoptic-L] Arguments for...
Jack Kilmon
jkilmon@...
Mar 2, 2001 2:36 pm
5761
... indication ... Ed Tyler: If I may offer the following pedestrian observation: In the year 2001, in America at least, it is entirely possible that the...
LeeEdgarTyler@...
Mar 2, 2001 3:27 pm
5762
... How distinct were the various OT traditions - Hebrew, Greek, Aramaic - in the 1st Century? Regards, Robert Brenchley RSBrenchley@... Synoptic-L...
RSBrenchley@...
Mar 3, 2001 6:08 pm
5763
I have just come across the following in the old commentary on the Greek text of Luke, J. M. Creed, "The Gospel according to St. Luke" (London, 1930) -- ... ...
Brian E. Wilson
brian@...
Mar 4, 2001 8:40 am
5764
Brian Wilson wrote -- ... Robert Brenchley commented -- ... Sufficiently distinct for us to recognize that whereas Matthew and Mark have agreements of wording...
Brian E. Wilson
brian@...
Mar 4, 2001 8:42 am
5765
EGRAPSEN Brian E. Wilson ... first: A couple points on LUke and LXX/MT by memory: LUke 4 quotes Is 61 and jumps to Is 58on the basis of a gezera shava that ...
Randall Buth
ButhFam@...
Mar 4, 2001 12:25 pm
5766
egrapsen RSBrenchley ... in ... Well, it now appears that a written Aramaic OT tradition did not exist in the first century. See "Aramaic Targums in Qumran",...
Randall Buth
ButhFam@...
Mar 4, 2001 12:39 pm
5767
... exist in the first century. See "Aramaic Targums in Qumran", in Dict. NT Backgrounds (IVP 2000)<< Hello Randall, For some while I (we) have heard it said...
David C. Hindley
dhindley@...
Mar 4, 2001 2:07 pm
5768
In a message dated 3/2/2001 4:53:11 AM Eastern Standard Time, poirier@... writes: << As to the possibility of Lukan posteriority: Although I now accept...
Maluflen@...
Mar 4, 2001 3:39 pm
5769
In a message dated 3/4/2001 3:21:51 AM Eastern Standard Time, brian@... writes: << First of all, is Creed factually correct that in material...
Maluflen@...
Mar 4, 2001 4:03 pm
5770
Randall Buth wrote -- ... Randall, Many thanks for this. I agree that the Lk 4 material was probably originally midrash and therefore created in either Hebrew...
Brian E. Wilson
brian@...
Mar 4, 2001 7:14 pm
5771
I just came across this article by Walter Schmithals: New Test. Stud. vol. 45, 1999, pp. 472-497 ZUR GESCHICHTE DER SPRUCHQUELLE Q UND DER TRADENTEN DER...
Wieland Willker
willker@...
Mar 4, 2001 9:37 pm
5772
In a message dated 3/4/01 1:57:46 PM Eastern Standard Time, brian@... writes: << The question on my mind at the moment is why the birth...
Maluflen@...
Mar 5, 2001 3:55 pm
5773
shalom David, ... NB: 4Q156 may not be a targum at all but a piece from a day of atonement reading. Qumran had MANY Aramaic writings, previous unknown works...
Randall Buth
ButhFam@...
Mar 5, 2001 11:29 pm
5774
... shewa ... The point was that this was highly improbable in Greek. The Hebrew link "ratson l-YY" is not translated in Greek texts of Is 58.5. One would have...
Randall Buth
ButhFam@...
Mar 5, 2001 11:32 pm
5775
In a message dated 3/4/01 1:57:46 PM Eastern Standard Time, brian@... writes: << The question on my mind at the moment is why the birth...
Having problems with message search?
Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.
