I have reviewd this book. For those who are interested I attach a slightly edited version (which highlights some different issues compared to Brian's post): ...
Peter M. Head
pmh15@...
Dec 1, 2000 10:46 am
5351
... I have immediately ordered this book. Cool: Photographs of ancient archives and libraries now completely lost! I didn't even know that Millard was in our...
Wieland Willker
willker@...
Dec 1, 2000 11:05 am
5352
To: Stephen C. Carlson, << (I'd rather avoid infelicitous expressions such as "partisan" that are too emotionally charged with baggage considering the amount...
Steven Craig Miller
scmiller@...
Dec 1, 2000 11:34 am
5353
Steven Miller asked -- ... Taylor described them as "Reasons for Affirming the Priority of Mark" ("The Gospels: A Short Introduction" - 8th edn, London 1956 -...
Brian E. Wilson
brian@...
Dec 1, 2000 11:45 am
5354
Good try Wieland, but I think I'd stand by my commas in that sentence. Pete Synoptic-L Homepage: http://www.bham.ac.uk/theology/synoptic-l List Owner:...
Peter M. Head
pmh15@...
Dec 1, 2000 3:21 pm
5355
To: Stephen C. Carlson, In an earlier message I wrote the following: << From my (admittedly) partisan point of view, your assertion seems ridiculous. >> It was...
Steven Craig Miller
scmiller@...
Dec 1, 2000 5:14 pm
5356
Thanks to Brian Wilson for giving us Taylor's six "Reasons for Affirming the Priority of Mark". Are you saying that the statements are true, but the deduction...
Peter M. Head
pmh15@...
Dec 1, 2000 6:10 pm
5357
Stephen Craig Miller wrote : <<There is no real "fallacy" here, only your accusation of a "fallacy." In all seriousness, can you imagine Tuckett blushing...
Douglas Fitzpatrick
toy264@...
Dec 1, 2000 6:42 pm
5358
... [snip] ... I'm now very happy to say that it looks like -- thanks to the efforts of Jonathan Magid at Metalabs -- C-P and Kata Markon are back up and...
Jeffrey B. Gibson
jgibson000@...
Dec 1, 2000 8:25 pm
5359
To: Brian E. Wilson, << In my view, all these "reasons" are fully consistent with the theory of Markan Priority being false. They are as much evidence against,...
Steven Craig Miller
scmiller@...
Dec 1, 2000 11:32 pm
5360
Peter Head wrote -- ... Yes. Taylor's implied argument uses erroneous logic. For the purposes of my argument I am prepared to assume that Taylor's statements...
Brian E. Wilson
brian@...
Dec 2, 2000 10:00 am
5361
Steven Miller wrote -- ... Let's take an example to illustrate the general point. Let us suppose that what Taylor states in "Reason 4" is true. That is, let us...
Brian E. Wilson
brian@...
Dec 2, 2000 10:00 am
5362
David Hindley asks whether by "fallacy" I mean "erroneous logic" or an "error in a premise" of an argument which may use valid logic. I think Mark Goodacre...
Brian E. Wilson
brian@...
Dec 2, 2000 10:01 am
5363
In a message dated 12/2/2000 4:54:18 AM Eastern Standard Time, brian@... writes: << To put the point another way, the arguments that have (very) ...
Maluflen@...
Dec 2, 2000 11:53 am
5364
To: Brian E. Wilson, << My point is that Taylor's logic is erroneous. Even if Mark is a documentary descendant of neither Matthew nor Luke, it simply does not ...
Steven Craig Miller
scmiller@...
Dec 2, 2000 1:05 pm
5365
Brian Wilson wrote -- ... Leonard Maluf replied -- ... I would agree with you if you could show, for instance, that any one of Taylor's traditional arguments...
Brian E. Wilson
brian@...
Dec 2, 2000 4:32 pm
5366
Brian Wilson wrote -- ... Steven Miller replied -- ... Thanks. Best wishes, BRIAN WILSON E-mail; brian@... HOMEPAGE www.twonh.demon.co.uk...
Brian E. Wilson
brian@...
Dec 2, 2000 4:37 pm
5367
Buried in the bowels of my web site, I have excerpts of V. Taylor's argument for Mark's Priority. Here is the excerpt: Taylor, Vincent, The Gospel According...
Stephen C. Carlson
scarlson@...
Dec 2, 2000 5:58 pm
5368
Randall Buth wrote -- ... In this case, would we not expect to find instances in Luke of quotations from or allusions to the books of the OT which are closer...
Brian E. Wilson
brian@...
Dec 2, 2000 6:47 pm
5369
To: Stephen C. Carlson, Taylor writes: << ... [they] all combine to make it certain that Mark is our earliest Gospel used as a source by Matthew and Luke. >> ...
Steven Craig Miller
scmiller@...
Dec 2, 2000 7:30 pm
5370
... The above is quotation from V. Taylor spotted by Stephen Carlson, except that I have added the words in capital letters forming an EITHER...OR... ...
Brian E. Wilson
brian@...
Dec 2, 2000 7:34 pm
5371
To: Brian E. Wilson, VT: << Significant of the stability of critical opinion is the fact that, in a modern commentary, it is no longer necessary to prove the...
Steven Craig Miller
scmiller@...
Dec 2, 2000 8:04 pm
5372
In a message dated 12/2/2000 2:26:37 PM Eastern Standard Time, scmiller@... writes: << To: Stephen C. Carlson, Taylor writes: << ... [they] all...
Maluflen@...
Dec 2, 2000 9:56 pm
5373
... High average relative to what? Even allowing for gentrification of language, we would expect, say, 90% agreement in transcribed texts. And even allowing...
Tim Reynolds
molad@...
Dec 2, 2000 11:22 pm
5374
To: Leonard Maluf, << What makes them work in combination if, as you seem to imply, the arguments are not probative taken individually? So you think five ...
Steven Craig Miller
scmiller@...
Dec 3, 2000 12:12 am
5375
Steven Craig Miller, greetings: (Here I would be tempted to add [with all due respect to Peter M. Head] a point "c": and by Matthew's and Luke's higher [or...
Richard Anderson
randerson58@...
Dec 3, 2000 1:57 am
5376
Following hard on my request to provide LP bibliography so that I can actually say with some authority what "they" are saying about the LP for the Paulist...
Jeffrey B. Gibson
jgibson000@...
Dec 3, 2000 2:01 am
5377
... I saw this auditory piracy business over 20 years ago, starting from Clement. I had read it four times in Smith’s popular version: once years before,...
Tim Reynolds
molad@...
Dec 3, 2000 5:26 am
5378
... I'm sure you're already taking this for granted, but since it isn't explicitly stated, I'll mention it anywa But I do hope that there'll be discussion of...
l. j. swain
x99swain@...
Dec 3, 2000 6:29 am
5379
Steven Miller wrote -- ... The statement was -- ... The fallacy is that the conclusion does not follow from the premises of the argument. The logic is...
