Jim West wrote -- ... Which Q hypothesis? According to W. Schmittals, Mark was a documentary ancestor of Q (sic), according to D. Zeller and H. T. Fleddermann...
Brian E. Wilson
brian@...
Oct 1, 2000 4:14 pm
4873
... My knowledge of Rolland's theory is mediated through Neirynck's exposition of it. If you look at the figure on page 306 of his EVANGELICA II, it shows in...
Stephen C. Carlson
scarlson@...
Oct 1, 2000 5:07 pm
4874
... Yes. I'm beginning to believe that any source critic who proposes a hypothetical document must also propose a reconstruction of that document, so that...
Stephen C. Carlson
scarlson@...
Oct 1, 2000 5:08 pm
4875
It's that time of year again when the annual Society of Biblical Literature meeting is just round the corner and I begin to arrange the now traditional meeting...
Jeffrey B. Gibson
jgibson000@...
Oct 1, 2000 5:17 pm
4876
... q + mk = mt and lk (with M and L respectively)- this is the classical q hypothesis. this is the one most people think of whn asked a simple question about...
Jim West
jwest@...
Oct 1, 2000 6:20 pm
4877
... If you ask the experts, this is the classical "Two Document Hypothesis." If you want a straight answer, it would help to ask a straight question, i.e., one...
Stephen C. Carlson
scarlson@...
Oct 1, 2000 7:11 pm
4878
Brian Wilson wrote -- ... Leonard, I am not sure that your recent reply addressed any of the points I made above, which are all reasons for assigning the...
Brian E. Wilson
brian@...
Oct 1, 2000 8:09 pm
4879
... yes of course-- of which Q is the constituent document number 1 while mark is document 2-- hence the very clever name- two document hypothesis.. whats ...
Jim West
jwest@...
Oct 1, 2000 8:11 pm
4880
Brian Wilson wrote -- ... Stephen Carlson commented -- ... Stephen, I would say that a source critic cannot even begin a reconstruction of a hypothetical...
Brian E. Wilson
brian@...
Oct 1, 2000 8:14 pm
4881
... I think it all depends on what you mean by "defined." I am applauding them for reconstructing Q *and* documenting their decisions every step of the way....
Stephen C. Carlson
scarlson@...
Oct 2, 2000 2:23 am
4882
Brian Wilson wrote -- ... Stephen Carlson replied -- ... is. ... Stephen, I wonder whether it does allow the interested critic to do this unless the IQP have...
On 29 September, in reply to D Hindley's query, Leonard Maluf wrote: <<John Kilgallen, "The Function of Stephen's Speech (Acts 7, 2 - 53)," Bib 70 (1989),...
Peter Doble
peter.doble@...
Oct 2, 2000 12:02 pm
4885
... I am afraid, to answer your question, you are going to have to read the IQP yourself and see if you are satisfied. Without a definition of what you mean...
Stephen C. Carlson
scarlson@...
Oct 2, 2000 1:08 pm
4886
I've now come to the conclusion that the pericope Matt 23:37-39 cannot have been in 'Q' but must have been composed by the author of Matthew's gospel. It has...
Ron Price
ron.price@...
Oct 2, 2000 4:48 pm
4887
I'm sorry I didn't reply sooner. I was busy on Friday, and did not have access to the original message, over the weekend. In order to argue my hypothesis, over...
dgentil@...
Oct 2, 2000 8:05 pm
4888
Ron, First I'd like to say, that in my opinion your theory seems to be the most viable single hypothetical source theory, I've seen. Also, I've noted that my...
dgentil@...
Oct 2, 2000 8:34 pm
4889
Can anyone please give references for any source of information on the aims of the International Q Project? I would like to know what task they have set...
Brian E. Wilson
brian@...
Oct 2, 2000 9:23 pm
4890
... Gospel of Thomas has 66) Jesus said, "Show me the stone which the builders have rejected. That one is the cornerstone." (from Psalm 118) 17) Jesus said,...
Andrew Smith
asmith@...
Oct 3, 2000 1:42 am
4891
... For a couple of sketches on the web, see the Bamberg site (Paul Hoffmann et al) and the Claremont site (James Robinson et al). These and other Q web...
Mark Goodacre
M.S.Goodacre@...
Oct 3, 2000 11:53 am
4892
Dave Gentile, Your hypothesis is impressive, but appears to be too complex. The paradigm of 2SH can also keep its explainability if 2SH is revised as follows. ...
Hyeon Woo Shin
shin0000@...
Oct 3, 2000 12:18 pm
4893
fortress press now says that the critical edition of q- in the hermeneia series by the way, ran into a snag and is expected to be released nov. 17th. it will...
Jim West
jwest@...
Oct 3, 2000 3:23 pm
4894
The forthcoming on-line seminar with John Kloppenborg-Verbin is now advertised on the Synoptic-L homepage (http://www.bham.ac.uk/theology/synoptic-l). ****...
Mark Goodacre
M.S.Goodacre@...
Oct 3, 2000 4:28 pm
4895
For reference: My suggested ... both ... order ... Thank you for your comments. My first question is "How do you define too complex?" Compared to the 2SH with...
dgentil@...
Oct 3, 2000 5:01 pm
4896
... The release date seems set to coincide with the SBL. And if the book is brought there to be sold in the Fortress booth, the price will be 25% less there --...
Jeffrey B. Gibson
jgibson000@...
Oct 3, 2000 5:39 pm
4897
Dave Gentile, Thank you for your kind response. Now I understand that your hypothesis is not really complex, but still "looks" complex. It appears to be...
Hyeon Woo Shin
shin0000@...
Oct 3, 2000 10:50 pm
4898
The BTI (Boston Theological Institute) New Testament Colloquium met last evening at Weston-EDS to hear and discuss a paper by Joel Markus on "Son of Man as Son...
Maluflen@...
Oct 3, 2000 11:35 pm
4899
Hyeon Woo Shin, Thank you for your response. I think some kind of m-theory is needed in order to settle this question. It seems to me that often the approach...
dgentil@...
Oct 4, 2000 1:30 am
4900
Dave Gentile, Thank you for your response. I still have some comments on your arguments. At Tue, 3 Oct 2000 20:22:31 -0500, Dave Gentile wrote: # 2 > Also, in...
Hyeon Woo Shin
shin0000@...
Oct 4, 2000 1:36 pm
4901
Reading H.H.Rowley's _The Relevance of the Bible_ in 1962 I was much impressed by the way he presented the OT prophets in their historical background. It was...
