... David, It seems to me beyond doubt that Mark did refer to LXX Isa 22,16. The question to be debated is why he did so. I for one held a position similar to...
3612
Thomas R. W. Longstaff
t_longst@...
Jan 20, 2000 6:00 pm
I think that both as an individual and a coordinator of the list I will call for an end to this thread (not the one about the tomb hewn from the rock but the...
3613
Brian E. Wilson
brian@...
Jan 21, 2000 11:47 am
Karel Hanhart wrote (concerning Mk 15.46b) -- ... Even if we assume that Mark wrote first, that canonical Mark was written shortly after 70, and that the...
3614
keras
keras@...
Jan 21, 2000 12:25 pm
3615
Maluflen@...
Jan 21, 2000 4:15 pm
In a message dated 1/21/2000 6:59:32 AM Eastern Standard Time, brian@... writes: [citing Francis Watson, who wrote..] << ... Note that the...
3616
Brian E. Wilson
brian@...
Jan 22, 2000 10:14 am
Brian Wilson wrote - ... citing Francis Watson, 'Toward a Literal Reading of the Gospels' in ed. Richard Bauckham, "The Gospels for All Christians" (Cambridge,...
3617
K. Hanhart
K.Hanhart@...
Jan 22, 2000 11:48 am
... Dear Brian, Thank you for the warning against allegorizing - the warning should be heeded. But the interpreter must make use of all the instruments of ...
3618
K. Hanhart
K.Hanhart@...
Jan 22, 2000 1:36 pm
Brian, My computer sent the wrong version of my last message. "reults" should read "results". A following sentence should read: "On the other hand you will...
3619
Brian E. Wilson
brian@...
Jan 22, 2000 1:44 pm
Karel Hanhart wrote -- ... Yes. I totally agree with the above. I am committed to the use of critical method. Indeed, I would say that there is no other...
3620
Brian E. Wilson
brian@...
Jan 22, 2000 1:54 pm
Karel Hanhart wrote - ... Many thanks for this. I had already replied before receiving the above, however. My conjectural emendation was - ... Text criticism...
3621
Maluflen@...
Jan 22, 2000 4:47 pm
In a message dated 1/22/2000 5:19:38 AM Eastern Standard Time, brian@... writes: << Brian Wilson wrote - ... citing Francis Watson, 'Toward a...
3622
Mark Goodacre
M.S.Goodacre@...
Jan 22, 2000 8:36 pm
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2000 10:25:59 -0600 From: "Jeffrey B. Gibson" <jgibson000@...> Reply-To: jgibson000@... X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en]...
3623
Rick Strelan
rick.strelan@...
Jan 24, 2000 5:38 am
If you will pardon some wondering aloud: I am wondering whether Jesus was actually called by that name at all/from birth. It seems to me to be too ...
3624
Brian E. Wilson
brian@...
Jan 24, 2000 8:49 am
Rick Strelan wrote - ... A fascinating thought indeed. I see no a priori reason why Jesus should not have adopted a name other than his birth name. If Simon...
3625
Mark Goodacre
M.S.GOODACRE@...
Jan 24, 2000 10:33 am
... Since Jesus seems to have been a pretty common name, I would have thought that the reverse is possible: in a culture that stressed the meaning of names,...
3626
Mark Goodacre
M.S.GOODACRE@...
Jan 24, 2000 10:36 am
My article "_Beyond the Q Impasse_ or Down a Blind Alley?" is published in the most recent JSNT 76 (December 1999), pp. 33-52. The same issue features an...
3627
Zeba Crook
zcrook@...
Jan 24, 2000 2:07 pm
... You are right, there are no direct quotes of Joshua in the NT, but the GNT4 (p. 893-94) lists 18 "allusions and verbal parallels" to Joshua, for whatever...
3628
Thomas R. W. Longstaff
t_longst@...
Jan 24, 2000 2:31 pm
... I think so. It seems to me that Hebrews 11:30ff provides at least one New Testament reference to the book of Joshua. The mention of Rahab in James 2:25...
3629
Jim West
jwest@...
Jan 24, 2000 3:53 pm
... hmm- i guess you are upset by all the blood and gore and killing at the command of God. ... you sound like a good gnostic. ... Well said Thomas. ... ...
3630
Maluflen@...
Jan 24, 2000 3:58 pm
In a message dated 1/24/2000 5:38:45 AM Eastern Standard Time, M.S.GOODACRE@... writes: ... Since Jesus seems to have been a pretty common name, I would...
3631
Maluflen@...
Jan 24, 2000 8:33 pm
In a message dated 1/24/2000 11:01:38 AM Eastern Standard Time, jwest@... writes: [citing Thomas Longstaff] << < Still, you make a good point. I don't...
3632
Carl W. Conrad
cwconrad@...
Jan 24, 2000 8:45 pm
... And my son, when very young (back in the 60's) used to say that his favorite baseball player was JEE'ZUS ALLOW'--Jesus Alou. There may not be a Judas, but...
3633
Maluflen@...
Jan 24, 2000 9:53 pm
In a message dated 1/24/2000 3:47:48 PM Eastern Standard Time, cwconrad@... writes: << There may not be a Judas, but there are, I think some...
3634
Jack Kilmon
jkilmon@...
Jan 24, 2000 10:26 pm
... Ancient Hebrew and Aramaic names appear to have had an impact on their users by virtue of their root meanings more than whomever had used the name in the ...
3635
Rick Strelan
rick.strelan@...
Jan 24, 2000 11:20 pm
It is common to suggest that Jesus' 'real' name was Yehoshua or some similar Hebrew form. But why could it not have been IHSOUS. ie a Greek name? ...
3636
ll
louis@...
Jan 25, 2000 3:23 am
... That isn't exactly the case. The Penteteuch records taht Moses called Hoshea Ben Nun Yehoshua instead. This does not imply the tetragrammaton so much as...
3637
Stephen C. Carlson
scarlson@...
Jan 25, 2000 3:57 am
This is a just a simple reminder that all members posting to Synoptic-L should identify themselves in their messages. (Protocol #8). Stephen Carlson -- Stephen...
3638
Brian E. Wilson
brian@...
Jan 25, 2000 9:16 am
Rick Strelan wrote -- ... It seems to me that you are really asking whether Jesus' parents spoke Greek rather than Hebrew/Aramaic, and used the Greek name...
3639
Jack Kilmon
jkilmon@...
Jan 25, 2000 5:25 pm
... His "real" name was Aramaic Yeshua. There is every indication he was a Jew and not an Hellenic cynic sage. ... Josephus' reference at xviii.3.3 to "He was...
3640
Maluflen@...
Jan 25, 2000 8:59 pm
In a message dated 1/25/2000 12:30:19 PM Eastern Standard Time, jkilmon@... writes: << Aside from the historicity of a member of the Sanhedrin named...
