http://rickrozoff.wordpress.com/2010/01/28/pentagon-confronts-russia-in-the-balt\
ic-sea


Stop NATO
January 28, 2010


Pentagon Confronts Russia In The Baltic Sea
Rick Rozoff


Twelve months ago a new U.S. administration entered the White House as the world
entered a new year.

Two and a half weeks later the nation's new vice president, Joseph Biden, spoke
at the annual Munich Security Conference and said "it's time to press the reset
button and to revisit the many areas where we can and should be working together
with Russia."

Incongruously to any who expected a change in tact if not substance regarding
strained U.S.-Russian relations, in the same speech Biden emphasized that, using
the "New World Order" shibboleth of the past generation at the end, "Two months
from now, the members of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization will gather to
celebrate the 60th year of this Alliance. This Alliance has been the cornerstone
of our common security since the end of World War II. It has anchored the United
States in Europe and helped forge a Europe whole and free." [1]

Six months before, while Chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, he
rushed to the nation of Georgia five days after the end of the country's
five-day war with Russia as an emissary for the George W. Bush administration,
and pledged $1 billion in assistance to the beleaguered regime of former U.S.
resident Mikheil Saakashvili.

To demonstrate how serious Biden and the government he represented were about
rhetorical gimmicks like reset buttons, four months after his Munich address
Biden visited Ukraine and Georgia to shore up their "color revolution"-bred
heads of state (outgoing Ukrainian President Viktor Yushchenko is married to a
Chicagoan and former Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush official) in their
anti-Russian and pro-NATO stances.

While back in Georgia he insisted "We understand that Georgia aspires to join
NATO. We fully support that aspiration."

In Ukraine he said "As we reset the relationship with Russia, we reaffirm our
commitment to an independent Ukraine, and we recognize no sphere of influence or
no ability of any other nation to veto the choices an independent nation makes,"
[2] also in reference to joining the U.S.-dominated military bloc. Biden's
grammar may have been murky, but his message was unmistakeably clear.

Upon his return home Biden gave an interview to the Wall Street Journal, the
contents of which were indicated by the title the newspaper gave its account of
them - "Biden Says Weakened Russia Will Bend to U.S." - and which were
characterized by the Center for Strategic and International Studies as "the most
critical statements from a senior administration official to date vis-a-vis
Russia." [3]

It took the Barack Obama government eight months to make its first friendly
gesture to Russia. In September of last year the American president and Defense
Secretary Robert Gates announced that they were abandoning the Bush
administration's plan to station ten ground-based midcourse interceptor missiles
in Poland in favor of a "stronger, smarter, and swifter" alternative.

The new system would rely on the deployment of Aegis class warships equipped
with SM-3 (Standard Missile-3) missiles - with a range of at least 500
kilometers (310 miles) - which “provide the flexibility to move interceptors
from one region to another if needed,” [4] in Gates' words.

The first location for their deployment will be the Baltic Sea according to all
indications.

The proximity of Russia's two largest cities, St. Petersburg and Moscow,
especially the first, to the Baltic coast makes the basing of American warships
with interceptor missiles in that sea the equivalent of Russia stationing
comparable vessels with the same capability in the Atlantic Ocean near Delaware
Bay, within easy striking distance of New York City and Washington, D.C.

Although Washington canceled the earlier interceptor missile plans for Poland,
on January 20 the defense ministry of that country announced that not only would
the Pentagon go ahead with the deployment of a Patriot Advanced Capability-3
anti-ballistic missile battery in the country, but that it would be based on the
Baltic Sea coast 35 miles from Russia's Kaliningrad district. [5]

The previous month Viktor Zavarzin, the head of the Defense Committee of the
Russian State Duma (the lower house of parliament), said "Russia is concerned
with how rapidly new NATO members are upgrading their military infrastructure"
and "that Russia was especially concerned with the reconstruction of air bases
in the Baltic countries for NATO's purposes which include signal and air
intelligence radio of Russian territory." [6]

As it should be.

Since the Baltic Sea nations of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania were ushered into
NATO as full members in 2004, warplanes from Alliance member states have shared
four-month rotations in patrolling the region, with two U.S. deployments to
date.

Shortly before the patrols began almost six years ago the Russian media reported
that "Relations between Russia and Estonia have been tense ever since NATO built
a radar station on the Russian-Estonian border last year. On March 23, Russian
Foreign Ministry spokesman Alexander Yakovenko warned Russia would retaliate 'if
NATO planes fly over Russian borders after the Baltic nations join the
alliance.'" [7]

Last year the Obama-Biden administration went ahead with a series of major
military exercises in the Baltic region:

The annual BALTOPS (Baltic Operations), the largest international military
exercise conducted in the Baltic Sea, run by the U.S. Navy, NATO and the
latter's Partnership for Peace program which included naval forces from twelve
nations - Britain, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Latvia,
Lithuania, the Netherlands, Poland, Sweden and the United States - led by U.S.
Carrier Strike Group 12.

The 10-day Loyal Arrow 2009 NATO military exercises in Sweden with 50 jet
fighters (the U.S. Air Force's F-15 Eagle among them) and NATO AWACS.

The Cold Response 09 NATO exercises in Norway (north and west of the Baltic)
with over 7,000 troops from thirteen nations as well as air and naval forces.

"Cold Response 2010 is expected to be even larger" than last year's war games.
[8] The U.S. Marine Corps "is planning Cold Response 2010, an exercise in Norway
that could include a company of infantry Marines and a detachment of trainers
with Marine Corps Forces Special Operations Command." [9]

"The Corps has used caves carved into the sides of mountains here [Norway] for
nearly 20 years, storing vehicles, equipment and ammunition later shipped
everywhere from the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan to training exercises in
Africa....[T]he Norwegians plan their security knowing that Marines will defend
Norway in an attack using everything from Humvees to Howitzers that are already
in place." [10]

The Defense Professionals website in Germany published a report on January 26 of
a meeting of the Nordic-Baltic Chiefs of Defense (Denmark, Estonia, Latvia,
Norway, Finland. Lithuania and Sweden) to plan the "Baltic Host, Sabre Strike,
and Amber Hope exercises to be held in the Baltics this and the following year."

"Exercise Baltic Host will be held this year in Latvia for participants from
Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia, and the US." [11] Last year's Baltic Host in Estonia
included military personnel from that nation and from Latvia, Lithuania, United
States European Command (EUCOM) and Strike Force NATO.

The earlier Amber Hope 07 was held in Lithuania and included the participation
of over 1,700 troops from NATO and Partnership for Peace countries: Armenia,
Britain, Canada, Estonia, Finland, Germany, Latvia, Lithuania and Poland, as
well as representatives from NATO multinational headquarters.

Earlier this month a planning conference was held at the Gen. Adolfas
Ramanauskas Warfare Training Center in Lithuania for the Sabre Strike 2010
military drills "where representatives of Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia and the US
prepare[d] documentation and draft plans for the exercise which is scheduled to
take place in Latvia in October 2010."

"Sabre Strike 2010 will be designed to tune together interoperability procedures
of the three Baltic States and the US with prospects of participation in the
ISAF (International Security Assistance Force) operation in Afghanistan and
other multinational operations in the future. This exercise for the first time
will pull together troops of the Baltic States and the US for a training event
of such character." [12]

2,000 troops from the four nations will take part and the war games will end
with "a complex field exercise." [13]

On January 28 the Helsingin Sanomat announced that "Finland is to play host to
what is by far the largest naval military exercise that has ever been seen in
Finnish territorial waters" in September which "will be joined by 50 ships and
2,500 persons."

The Northern Coasts maneuvers will include warships and troops from Denmark,
Estonia, France, Germany, Latvia, Poland, the Netherlands, Sweden and the United
States and will consist of both sea and land drills, and the "maritime
operations will be supported by air and special troops." [14]

Not only hosting the largest naval war games in its history - ones simulating "a
conflict between two countries that has an effect on the surrounding countries
as well" - Finland will provide "nearly the entire Navy fleet" for the
operation.

A local reported inquired whether the maneuvers were related to Russia's plans
for a natural gas pipeline in the Baltic Sea:

"At least according to the Finnish Navy, the exercise does not have anything to
do with the Baltic Sea's planned underwater gas pipeline, Nord Stream.

"But at least off hand, Annele Apajakari, Chief Public Information Officer at
Navy Command Finland, was unable to say why also the United States, the
Netherlands, and France will be involved." [15]

The preceding day the same newspaper ran a story about prospective NATO-Russia
military tensions in the Baltic region and quoted retired Lieutenant-General
Matti Ahola as warning: "If the United States were to bring its planned
anti-missile vessels into the Baltic Sea, it would bring about a reaction." [16]

That was a week after the announcement that U.S. Patriot missiles and 100 troops
were headed to Poland's - eastern - Baltic coast.

In an article bearing the headline "Thanks to Poland, the alliance will defend
the Baltics," the British weekly the Economist on January 14 wrote that NATO
would "stand by its weakest members — the Baltic states of Estonia, Latvia and
Lithuania" - and was elaborating "formal contingency plans to defend them."

The magazine reported that "The main push came from Poland, a big American ally
in Iraq and Afghanistan. It was the first to gain contingency plans —
initially only against a putative (and implausible) attack from Belarus, a
country barely a quarter of its size....Poland accelerated its push for a
bilateral security relationship with America, including the stationing of
Patriot anti-missile rockets on Polish soil in return for hosting a
missile-defence base." [17]

"Formal approval is still pending and the countries concerned have been urged to
keep it under wraps. But sources close to the talks say the deal is done: the
Baltic states will get their plans, probably approved by NATO’s military side
rather than its political wing. They will be presented as an annex to existing
plans regarding Poland, but with an added regional dimension. That leaves room
for Sweden and Finland (not members of the alliance but increasingly close to
it) to take a role in the planning too. A big bilateral American exercise
already planned for the Baltic this summer is likely to widen to include other
countries." [18]

Poland is the prototype for and the foundation upon which the Pentagon and NATO
are constructing a formidable military - naval, air, ground and interceptor
missile - network in the Baltic Sea region on Russia's northwest frontier.

Late last year Lithuanian Minister of Foreign Affairs Vygaudas Usackas
delivered a lecture called "The New NATO Strategic Concept: Lithuania's Vision"
to participants of the Higher Command Studies Course of the Baltic Defense
College (BALTDEFCOL) in which he stated "NATO is the embodiment of transatlantic
relations. NATO should remain open to western countries, such as Finland or
Sweden, to eastern countries like Ukraine or Georgia, as well as to the Balkan
countries: Bosnia and Herzegovina, Macedonia, Montenegro and other countries."
[19] (The Baltic Defense College is based in Estonia and in addition to
instructing officers from Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania also trains personnel
from other NATO and EU states and countries like Bosnia, Georgia, Moldova,
Romania and Ukraine.)

As well as advocating the incorporation of states neighboring Russia to its west
and its south into NATO, the Lithuanian foreign minister asserted "that Article
5 was the basis of the organisation and it should remain the cornerstone of NATO
in the future." [20]

NATO's Article 5 is a mutual military assistance obligation, the main substance
of which is in its first paragraph, which reads:

"The Parties agree that an armed attack against one or more of them in Europe or
North America shall be considered an attack against them all and consequently
they agree that, if such an armed attack occurs, each of them, in exercise of
the right of individual or collective self-defence recognised by Article 51 of
the Charter of the United Nations, will assist the Party or Parties so attacked
by taking forthwith, individually and in concert with the other Parties, such
action as it deems necessary, including the use of armed force, to restore and
maintain the security of the North Atlantic area."

The outlines of a NATO "defense force" in the Baltic area and beyond were
further delineated last November when it was revealed that Poland, Lithuania and
Ukraine are to establish a "joint army." The combined military unit "may have a
political objective. It is meant to set up an alternative center of military
consolidation for West European projects, a center which could embrace former
Soviet republics (above all Ukraine), now outside NATO. There is no doubt who
will control this process, considering U.S. influence in Poland and the
Baltics." [21]

Additionally, it will be linked to the Multinational Corps Northeast which was
initially formed of Danish, German and Polish troops and later joined by forces
from Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, the Czech Republic, Romania, Slovakia and
Slovenia. And the U.S. "[T]he Baltic military has cooperation experience with
Polish troops. The Ukrainian military, too, has cooperation experience with NATO
within the Partnership for Peace program....Establishment of a permanent
brigade-class joint unit is expected to improve teamwork, allowing Ukrainians to
grow into NATO's command, staff, tactical and logistic culture." [22]

The Multinational Corps Northeast has been used in Afghanistan where it has
acquired direct combat zone experience.

The American client responsible for Ukraine's abrupt pro-NATO orientation,
President Viktor Yushchenko, barely won 5 percent of the vote in this year's
January 17 presidential election and is on his way out of office barring a
reprise of the "orange revolution" of six years ago. Though at the NATO Military
Committee meeting on January 27 Colonel-General Ivan Svyda, Chief of the General
Staff and Commander-in-Chief of the Ukrainian Armed Forces, announced that his
nation was training troops for the NATO Response Force, a 25,000-troop global
strike force. "The NATO Response Force (NRF) is a highly ready and
technologically advanced force made up of land, air, sea and special forces
components that the Alliance can deploy quickly wherever needed.

"It is capable of performing missions worldwide across the whole spectrum of
operations...." [23]

The Ukrainian military chief announced "We selected 12 detachments that are
undergoing training in line with NATO standards and represent all types and
branches of troops, including engineer units, the marines, field engineers,
chemical and biological defense troops and others. Up to 500 Ukrainian
servicemen will participate in the [alliance's response] force." [24]

The U.S. and NATO intend Ukraine to serve as a bridge between their new outposts
on the Baltic Sea to the north and Georgia and Azerbaijan on Russia's southern
border.

Ukraine is being mentored and shepherded into the NATO pen with the U.S.
employing the Baltic states of Poland, Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania as both
models and guides. The same mechanism with the same actors is being used for
Georgia.

Last month the defense ministers of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania signed a
communique on joint military collaboration which "welcomed closer military
cooperation in the security sector between the Baltic States and the USA which
also included joint exercises in the Baltic region." [25]

After releasing the statement, the three defense chiefs visited the Adazi
Training Base in Latvia and "met with Gen. Roger A. Brady, Commander US Air
Forces in Europe and NATO Allied Air Component.

"In the communique the NATO operation in Afghanistan was underscored as a
priority of all the Baltic States." [26]

On January 1 the Trilateral Baltic Battalion (BALTBAT) - with troops from
Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia - began duty in the 14th rotation of the NATO
Response Force. "On the same date Lithuanians...also enter[ed] a half-year
standby period in the EU Battle Group." [27]

On the Western end of the Baltic, on January 17 Swedish Defense Minister Sten
Tolgfors spoke on the Targeting Decisions on Strengthening Defense
Capability (TDSDC) program launched on January 1, pledged that "Sweden will
develop its national defense in cooperation with NATO and neighbors Finland,
Denmark and Norway" and added:

"Our defense policy adds a new neighborhood perspective. The structure and
direction of Sweden's Armed Forces will continue to have a clear Baltic profile.
We have northern Europe's largest and most qualified Air Force
that is twice as large as any of our neighbors, and it has a full operational
range."

"It is the biggest renewal of security and defense policy for decades in
Sweden. We will use 2010 to make the requisite decisions to carry out the
modernization of our military, and civilian crisis, management capabilities."
[28]

Under the new program all members of the Swedish armed forces, now transitioned
from a conscript to an all-volunteer (according to NATO demands for military
"professionalization" of member and partner states) status, "are to be available
for deployment at home or abroad in five to seven days in situations of
'heightened alert.'" [29]

"In the old system, a third of the forces - which in 2008 meant 11,400 military
personnel - were supposed to be able to deploy within one year from
mobilization. In the new defence system, all 50,000 members of the forces would
have to be 'usable and available' within a week....The soldiers in the conscript
army could never be used for missions outside Sweden's borders, but now that all
soldiers will either be full-time employees or on contract, they will be
available to deploy anywhere....New is also the focus on the Baltic Sea Region."
[30]

Last autumn a German Luftwaffe Eurofighter intercepted a Russian plane over the
Baltic Sea. "After the German jet challenged the radar plane, the Russians
scrambled two fighters, which approached at supersonic speed. Finnish jets then
escorted the Russians back to international airspace, averting a further
escalation of the situation." [31]

This month NATO extended its Baltic warplane deployments until 2014. "The Baltic
skies are presently secured by the so-called NATO air police, which
in addition to fighter planes also provide air defense systems and manpower."
[32]

Added to the permanent presence of Western military aircraft are now American
Patriot missiles and troops to operate them in Poland, "a demonstrative
anti-Russian move" according to a leading general of the latter nation. [33]

Persistent U.S. and NATO military moves are threatening to turn the Baltic Sea
region into a powder keg that another hostile encounter between Western and
Russian military aircraft could ignite at any time.

As to government officials and the news media in Russia, a year is a
sufficiently long period of time to awaken from the illusion of an imaginative
rest button that will reverse a decade of NATO penetration of the Baltic Sea and
the consolidation of military infrastructure there aimed squarely - and
exclusively - at their own nation.



Related articles:


Scandinavia And The Baltic Sea: NATO’s War Plans For The High North
http://rickrozoff.wordpress.com/2009/08/31/scandinavia-and-the-baltic-sea-natos-\
war-plans-for-the-high-north

Afghan War: NATO Trains Finland, Sweden For Conflict With Russia
http://rickrozoff.wordpress.com/2009/09/01/afghan-war-nato-trains-finland-sweden\
-for-conflict-with-russia

End of Scandinavian Neutrality: NATO’s Militarization Of Europe
http://rickrozoff.wordpress.com/2009/08/28/end-of-scandinavian-neutrality-natos-\
militarization-of-europe

ABC Of West’s Global Military Network: Afghanistan, Baltics, Caucasus
http://rickrozoff.wordpress.com/2009/10/28/abc-of-wests-global-military-network-\
afghanistan-baltics-caucasus


1) Berlin Wall: From Europe Whole And Free To New World Order
Stop NATO, November 9, 2009

http://rickrozoff.wordpress.com/2009/11/09/berlin-wall-from-europe-whole-and-fre\
e-to-new-world-order
2) Associated Press, July 23, 2009
3) Center for Strategic and International Studies, July 28, 2009
4) Russia Today, September 17, 2009
5) With Nuclear, Conventional Arms Pacts Stalled, U.S. Moves Missiles And
Troops To Russian Border
Stop NATO, January 22, 2010

http://rickrozoff.wordpress.com/2010/01/22/with-nuclear-conventional-arms-pacts-\
stalled-u-s-moves-missiles-and-troops-to-russian-border
6) Voice of Russia, December 8, 2009
7) RosBusinessConsulting, March 26, 2004
8) Barents Observer, March 4, 2009
9) Marine Corps Times, July 21, 2009
10) Ibid
11) Defense Professionals, January 26, 2010
12) Lithuanian Armed Forces, January 11, 2010
13) Ibid
14) Helsingin Sanomat, January 28, 2010
15) Ibid
16) Helsingin Sanomat, January 27, 2010
17) Economist, January 14, 2010
18) Ibid
19) Lithuanian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, November 28, 2009
20) Ibid
21) Russian Information Agency Novosti, November 18, 2009
22) Ibid
23) http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natolive/topics_49755.htm
24) Ukrinform, January 28, 2010
25) Defense Professionals, December 14, 2009
26) Ibid
27) Defense Professionals, January 4, 2010
28) Defense News, January 25, 2010
29) Ibid
30) Radio Sweden, January 18, 2010
31) The Local (Germany), November 3, 2009
32) Russian Information Agency Novosti, January 4, 2010
33) Interfax-Ukraine, January 20, 2010
===========================
Stop NATO
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stopnato

Blog site:
http://rickrozoff.wordpress.com/

To subscribe, send an e-mail to:
rwrozoff@...
or
stopnato-subscribe@yahoogroups.com

Daily digest option available.
==============================