Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
scrumdevelopment · Scrum Users
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Message search is now enhanced, find messages faster. Take it for a spin.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Does encreased communication hamper productivity as a team grows?   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #22541 of 42736 |
team size

--- In scrumdevelopment@yahoogroups.com, Ilja Preuss <it@...> wrote:
> split the team - depending on the source, the recommended size seems to
> vary between half a dozen and two dozen team members.

Huh? In Scrum the recommended team size is 7 plus or minus 2.

Isn't this a Scrum forum?

--mj




Fri Jul 20, 2007 10:17 pm

michaeljames...
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email

Forward
Message #22541 of 42736 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

... Is this a response from someone who actually experienced a scrum meeting taking half an hour? Or was it perhaps pure speculation that every team member...
Ilja Preuss
ipreussde
Offline Send Email
Jul 21, 2007
10:34 am

... Huh? In Scrum the recommended team size is 7 plus or minus 2. Isn't this a Scrum forum? --mj...
Michael James
michaeljames...
Offline Send Email
Jul 20, 2007
10:18 pm

As Ron Jeffries may be otherwise occupied I will borrow his famous tag 2 + 2 = 5 with sufficiently large enough quantities of 2. Team size can be as small a 1...
Mike Dwyer
protraveler1
Offline Send Email
Jul 21, 2007
12:44 am

a football team has 11 players at a time; likewise a scrum team has 7 +/- 2. otherwise it's not scrum, or not applicable/appropriate to scrum. if you have a...
Stephen Bobick
sbobick2
Offline Send Email
Jul 21, 2007
12:51 am

Thus, regretfully, proving Ron correct. Michael F. Dwyer "Planning constantly peers into the future for indications as to where a solution may emerge." "A Plan...
Mike Dwyer
protraveler1
Offline Send Email
Jul 21, 2007
1:36 am

... [whatever] It serves no one to obfuscate the basic definitions of Scrum. People are confused enough as it is. A Scrum team is a dedicated,...
Michael James
michaeljames...
Offline Send Email
Jul 21, 2007
9:10 am

... I beg to differ here. I've never seen Scrum *not* work well in small teams, even one-man shows. Just has to be adapted accordingly. Most of the practices...
Henrik Kniberg
hkniberg
Offline Send Email
Jul 22, 2007
12:11 pm

I wonder if a one person team doing Scrum is a contradiction in terms, unless of course the developer is the client / product owner. Surely collaboration...
Roy Morien
roymorien@...
Send Email
Jul 22, 2007
12:34 pm

... The original poster seemed to ask about Agile in general, so that's what I responded to. Perhaps I should have added something about the official Scrum...
Ilja Preuss
ipreussde
Offline Send Email
Jul 21, 2007
10:39 am

... Michael, PMFJI, but I'm puzzled. Why do you place so much emphasis on the team size? I agree that 7 +/- 2 is an excellent recommendation, but certainly...
George Dinwiddie
gdinwiddie
Offline Send Email
Jul 22, 2007
3:21 pm

... George, I guess they probably can, but I haven't personally observed larger groups making very good *Scrum* teams (apart from the fact they aren't Scrum...
Michael James
michaeljames...
Offline Send Email
Jul 22, 2007
7:31 pm

... 7 +/- 2 is considered the optimum, yes, but there will always be exceptions. Here are three examples of possible reasons to want to keep a 14 person team...
Henrik Kniberg
hkniberg
Offline Send Email
Jul 22, 2007
8:08 pm

... I can see advantages to letting the 14 people figure out how to split themselves up into teams. --mj...
Michael James
michaeljames...
Offline Send Email
Jul 23, 2007
1:06 am

... I'm not arguing that a 14 person team is going to have difficulties that a 7 person team doesn't. My query is about why you see this team size as an...
George Dinwiddie
gdinwiddie
Offline Send Email
Jul 22, 2007
9:06 pm

In scrumdevelopment@yahoogroups.com, George Dinwiddie wrote: My query is about why you see this team size as an integral part of scrum, e.g., that if you've...
Tom Mellor
t_mellor
Offline Send Email
Jul 22, 2007
9:47 pm

... <sigh/> Yes, I understand the recommendation. I agree with the recommendation. What I don't understand is saying, "if you've got less than 5 or more than...
George Dinwiddie
gdinwiddie
Offline Send Email
Jul 22, 2007
11:12 pm

Sure, it's fragile. All development is. Two-week sprints are great - 6 or 8 week aren't. The closer the team remains to Scrum's basic tenets, the better off...
Tom Mellor
t_mellor
Offline Send Email
Jul 23, 2007
3:34 pm

The reason why 30 day sprints are the norm is it usually takes that long for most companies to push quality code through all their environments. Two week ...
Anthony Principato
anthony_prin...
Offline Send Email
Jul 23, 2007
5:20 pm

It would be invigorating to see your stats as most the reporting over the past few years here indicates folks are happier with 10 and 5 day sprints. Michael F....
Mike Dwyer
protraveler1
Offline Send Email
Jul 23, 2007
9:24 pm

I prefer 15 day sprints. 10 day sprints are tolerable, but too crunched in my opinion with the overhead of the planning/review meetings disproportionately...
Stephen Bobick
sbobick2
Offline Send Email
Jul 23, 2007
10:44 pm

When you say 15 "day" sprints do you mean calendar days or business days? Assuming you meant 15 business days, adding 5 more days doesn't seem too far out...
Mark Smeltzer
mark.smeltzer
Offline Send Email
Jul 23, 2007
10:50 pm

I mean business days. A month is often 22 business days (or 23) but that's nit-picking. I think it's too long, but that's just my opinion. I found 15 day...
Stephen Bobick
sbobick2
Offline Send Email
Jul 23, 2007
11:01 pm

... Shortening the Sprint duration to less than 30 days (while keeping it regular) seems to be the one thing people can tinker with without losing the benefit...
Michael James
michaeljames...
Offline Send Email
Jul 23, 2007
11:56 pm

... I can see a 14-person team turning in adequate results, just as you can get adequate results without a dedicated ScrumMaster per team. I don't see how 14...
Michael James
michaeljames...
Offline Send Email
Jul 23, 2007
1:35 am

Team size is a subjective issue. What works for one team, may not work for another. Let the team figure it out and manage itself. If there are too many...
Kurt Smith
blitzpu
Offline Send Email
Jul 23, 2007
3:18 am

On 22 Jul 2007, at 20:30, Michael James wrote: [snip] ... [snip] Which definition is this? It's been some time since I read the Scrum books - and I don't have...
Adrian Howard
ajh65537
Offline Send Email
Jul 23, 2007
8:29 am

... My claim of "by definition" is (probably) overstated; I don't have the books handy either. We get 7 +/- 2 from Ken's slides and our own experience with ...
Michael James
michaeljames...
Offline Send Email
Jul 23, 2007
10:48 am

I find it most odd, and somewhat disconcerting, to see such a lengthy and earnest discussion about how many people makes a proper, true and correct Scrum team....
Roy Morien
roymorien@...
Send Email
Jul 23, 2007
11:14 am

... You'll get plenty of answers to those questions here. Scrum usually scales by groups of small teams ("Scrum of Scrums") communicating various different...
Michael James
michaeljames...
Offline Send Email
Jul 23, 2007
12:07 pm

... I meet similar situations, where companies ask me how their 60 people team (following waterfall) should do scrum. It takes quite a lot of effort to get the...
srinivas chillara
ceezone
Offline Send Email
Jul 23, 2007
5:22 pm
 First  |  |  Next > Last 
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help