... I'd rather there be nominative references to RFC 2822 (Internet Message Format), RFC 2368 (The mailto URL scheme), and RFC 1036 (Standard for USENET...
Note: Please interpret as sincere information-gathering, and not at all snarky. :) I would very much like to see a clear statement about the vision of the...
... I'm not on the board, but I urge you to take a look at the current draft - it's a compete rewrite of the latest version of RSS 2.0, aimed to clear up the...
... My vision for the board is to publish the RSS Profile and the clean rewrite of the RSS 2.0 Specification. I believe that following the roadmap means...
Just to clarify. The RSS board does have the power to change the RSS spec. The advisory board use to maintain a Website at Harvard, whom own the spec, but the ...
... In the next spec edit, I will add this to-do item to the spec: Revisit the issue of whether RSS 2.0 allows namespaced attributes to extend core elements....
This is a first draft of a work I want to present to the RSS advisory board for adoption. It basically enumerates all those RSS nuances that are normally...
Hi I am trying to allow a multi language site to public some information in rss. When I read the 2.0 specification [1], I noticed that a channel has a language...
The validator is correct that you can only have one channel in any RSS feed. Since you are providing multiple versions of your RSS, I assume you do the same...
I dl'd & installed the most recent Netscape. It will display it's own News Feeds that are in an older (rdf) form (that even FeedValidator won't validate), but...
I updated the RSS 2.0 draft specification with the two issues we discussed before the holidays -- the definition of the E-mail Address data type ... ...
... I don't think it would be wise for the Feed Validator to follow the RECOMMENDATION that closely, more specifically, it probably would be wise for the...
... As I said in my last email regarding emails, I'd rather we referenced RFC 1036 for the RECOMMENDED format. ... I think that's right: as long as we have an...
... The problem with RFC 1036 is that it only permits ASCII characters in the name. The implication is that feed producers would have to use mime-encoded words...
... RFC2822 only permits ASCII characters though as well, so what spec is the email address then complying with? How is it a valid email address? - Geoffrey...
... Just because there isn't an RFC, W3C or ISO spec somewhere that describes email addresses in the exact format used by RSS, that doesn't mean that RSS ...
Thanks... But the problem is that I had built an scripting way to change the language, then the user can change from english to french in the same page. I was...
Not sure if this has been raised before (can't see it) or if this is the right place to draw attention to it, but... I record mp3 audio clips (interviews &...
No you can't add a copyright element or attribute to the item element. But you can add a Dublin Core rights element to the item and you can also add a...
Hello, Today, you could use an RSS "extension" to include copyright like information an <item>. For example, you could use the "Dublin Core" extension. Or you...
Charles Iliya Krempeaux
supercanadian@...
Feb 3, 2007 6:18 pm
1232
... Should the profile define precedence rules for the case where the channel has a copyright element and item has a dc:rights element? RFC 4287 has the...
Thanks everyone. Yes, I guess DC:rights will do the trick. And yes, it did also occur to me that just adding a copyright notice in the description would at...
Some RSS 2.0 feeds are partial text and simply don't contain all the images and content. In those cases, the publisher of the feed would have to change his...
We recently discussed the RSS 2.0 feeds generated by Yahoo Groups for each mailing list, which aren't valid because they put usernames in item-author elements...
Thank you for that information Randy. I will try and put that in to effect and let you know how I get on. Best regards, Mark. ... the ... order ... integrate ...
... While that issue is truly a spec compliance issue, it is much less likely to cause problems with aggregators than the following: <title>Re: Could...
