[Moderator note: I'm permitting this to be posted, but if anyone is inclined to respond, please respond *off list* since this topic is more appropriate to...
I recently did a quick review of Plantinga's God and Other Minds (1967), one of P's early works. Very interesting to see some of the early questions that he...
... Chris, Flint's work is a wonderful piece of 19th century philosophical theology. And as you note, there is no Reformed objection to natural theology to be...
Greetings. I am student in Vedic studies in general and Vedanta school in perticular. I am interested in contributing to this group about profound epistemology...
Hi, I am asking for Stephen C. Evans's mail adress. ýf you give me his mail adress I would wery happy thanks. Ferhat ... Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your...
Michael is writing (or publishing) a book on natural theology, which I'm still waiting for. I was wondering if there are any good books already published on...
Norman Swartz wrote a good book that can be downloaded at no charge _____________________________________________________________ Click here for low rates and...
Vern, I am not sure why you would say, "RE seems to be opposed to natural law because of the proper basically idea, but maybe I just don't understand RE that...
I don't know if this will be of any help, but I'm attaching a (very) short paper that I wrote a while back on the compatibility of natural theology and ...
My article "God's Bridle: John Calvin's Application of Natural Law" was published at 22 J. Law & Relig. 225 (2006-2007). While I don't address RE, I conclude...
... Scott, I'm inclined to agree with this. I suspect that Reformed critics of natural law fall into the same trap as Reformed critics of natural theology....
Just a general reminder... This group does not accept attachments. If you send an attachment it will not be posted or sent to group members. It goes right to...
Well, since I can't attach it, I figured I'd just copy and paste it here since it's so short. - Stewart Stewart Clem PHIL 5210: Aquinas Seminar *Aquinas on...
... understand RE ... RE. The ... advocates ... law, the ... compatible ... interpreted ... to the ... further. ... Hi Larry, It's because natural law is...
Vern, Again, keep in mind my main point. Not all theories of natural law entail that knowledge of truth, justice, and morality are "completely" derived by ...
Dear All: 1. Let 'p' be any contingent truths. Let '<=>' stands for the logical equivalence relation. And a person believe a proposition q if he thinks that q...
As much as I follow what you are proposing, I am fairly sure that the major components of you proposal are false and presuppose a criterion of knowledge that...
Hey Larry, You: It is simply erroneous that humans cannot know contingent propositions and that God must determine the future to know the future. Me: As far as...
Dear Larry: 1. From your comments I fear I did not explain myself too well. : - ) What I did in the note was to take a theological truth-claim (i.e. the...
I am not sure if we are reading the same post. I am responding to his proposed explanation of the following regarding knowledge of "contingent truths." Dear...
Dear Larry: 1. I do not follow how you read into my passage below "that humans cannot know contingent propositions and that God must determine the future to...
Having problems with message search?
Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.
