Here is how to fight globalization if you are poor -- he is
clues in not allowing yourself to get sidtracked by those
who would bury you technical detail pertaining to
uncritical side issues, or even key issues that, alas,
are undefendable in the long run even though the
position is valid (i.e. the truth) and important (i.e.,
smoking gun evidence, exposing the methods and
ends of the criminal elites etc.)
Dear Dave (and activists who interested in the tactics of
fighting finance globalization on the internet),
It is a painful decision to make, but it the wrong strategy for me
to continue to waste my limited time, thinking power, and
reader absorption capactiy with continuous defending of
the smoking gun against rich "winning-through-powerful-
packaging" search-engine-fed permanent websites.
Even though the investigators (you) have accumulated establish
to any random jury's satisfaction (except one containing
Cheney's wife, Limbaugh's producer's mother etc.) that the
Pentagon killings were an inside job accomplished without
use of Flight 77 -- it is strategically wise to quit fighting
in this sector and to move on.
I have disclosures that will seriously undermine the entire
establishment in the eyes of the world -- and was ready to
begin systematically presenting them when I returned from
Micigan -- only to find that the Pentagon smoking gun
discussion on the lists was totally dominated by pro-Boeing
investigators, each with a fabulous website, concentrating
all of their effort on the five posts -- with no nod to all of the
other amassed evidence -- and no sign that you or anyone
else was on the lists answering them.
When I go to your website I find many references to the
pole dispute and to the fact that Fescado and you are
now in agreement with Harvey and Roberts that there
was no small plane. And, BUY THE WAY, I notice that
all reference to me is to the fact that your work was widley
distributed on the net by "Dick Eastman" and the name,
in blue, is a link to a Googlegroups search page where
--as they always have -- there is a nice list of posts of
my critics and one or two of my most shabby rush letters
on inane topics, letters with no content -- and that, as far
as I know, is my only "presence" on the entire web.
(So please KIILL THAT LINK FAST -- IT DOES MY CAUSES
MORE HARM THAN GOOD --IT IS THE ONLY FAVOR I ASK)
MORE HARM THAN GOOD --IT IS THE ONLY FAVOR I ASK)
And so I accept this development.
(I certainly don't blame you: I dash of sloppy posts, I never get
into the details of your math page and give you the kind of feedback
that specialists like Fescado, Harvey and Roberts (Spiker) can and do.
I persist in emphasizing what I think critical (i.e. video camera evidence
over poles is just one example)
ANd now for a general statement about how poor men with no
website should go about internet activism.
1. THe power of the non-website internet activist is that he
is flexible and can sent his e-list, newsgroup and to-individuals
posts -- if he has the critical information, if his messages are
powerful, then they will be distributed from individual to list,
from list to newsgroup, from newsgroup to individual etc.
in a catanation that those who would suppress this information
cannot easily follow.
2. It is folly for a non-website activist to lay seige to an
oppontent with a website -- because while your letters
may refute them every time again and again -- when the
dust settles, they are still there, their are still getting
hits from search engines, they still exclude your good
points from thier content -- just like taking on a
CFR newspaper by writing continuous letters to the editor.
So the proper strategy for the poor populist on the
attack is to BYPASS THE ENEMY FORTS -- SKIP
CONFRONTING THE ENEMY WEBSITES let
the Riveros,Fescados, Bosankoes, Harveys, "Isopodias,"
and Vialls control their website domains -- don't let them
detain you as you lay seige -- as I have been bogged down for two
weeks now -- arguing about poles and angles -- when
the real super weapons of truth we have to share remain
only in the back of your mind twiddling their thumbs while
the small details are argued. (Fact is if I were to continue
going after obstructive websites, realistic and disinterested
analysis would reqire that I take on your own sooner or later --
since your switch is certainly is major strategic loss of a
once secure beachhead on the web.
Isopodia for example is a college professor with all of the
resources of the University of Hawaii at her disposal and,
I suspect, a grant from someone to "bring scientific understanding
and objectiviey to the chaotic internet so filled with extremism and
rumor and myth" (something like that -- I've run into professors
posting with these grants backing them on the subject of the
Federal Reserve bank, funded to debunk, but masked as
a public service "bringing education to the untutored public" --
etc. ANd I say the heck with trying to fight the mighty
nonprofits and the "researchers they sponsor" (casting no
accusation against the sincerity of those who apply for
and take such a grant -- they can be sincere in what they
are doing, but the effect is the same) -- poor men cannot
take on richly endowed websites.
2. Don't get bogged down in detail that will loose the
average reader -- which is what 'math page" and the
analysis of the "downed-pole-therefore-the-Arabs-did-it"
can suck you into doing.
3. Always talk on the subjects that you know will
hurt the larger criminal establishment the most, that
is, expose their economic plundering engines, expose
the great criminal deeds of the past (world war one,
for example, was set up in 1913 as a power profit
making operation and a geopoliticaleconomic power
grab, set up in every detail to make very evil men
the financial, economic and political masters of the world.
(And now I am wondering if I will ever live to share
the discoveries I have made and documented so
completely -- I have let the guys who want to talk
about poles deter me from really tearing the guts
out of the big globalization and finance capitalism
lies.
Before the discovery of the small plane attack I was
in contact with economists around the world and
I was hitting globalization hard and effectively --
I was spreading the ideas of Jefferson and the
AMerican populism to foreigners hungry to learn
about these things that no American had ever
shared with them before --
but most of these connections have fallen by the
wayside as I have sent those in my address book
post after post answering the causual dismissals
of our Pentagon findings from the high towers of
their fancy. well formatted, convenient websites.
Dr. ROberts (Isopodia) has collected just the
testimony and just the photos that support her
position -- neglecting even to show the
pentagon attack frames, or to mention that
Gerard Holmgren (that other well-informed
fighter of good will) has laborously tracked down
every story of witnesses (the witnesses that
Isopodia publishes uncritically) and found them
all to be either hearsay, or second hand words-put-
in-mouth, and misleadingly selective -- you know
his essay and how thorough it was -- (do you
still carry a link to it, Dave -- no matter, that
is your business -- you will do what you will
do.)
Churchill and Bernard Baruch were the leading men
(working for the CIty and Wall Street) behind both
world war one profiteering and the great stock market
crash of 1929 (and thus the great depression power grab)
and even the profit making machinery that produced
such great wealth in the allies conduct of world war 2.
I have the specifics documented -- assembled piece by
piece from the leading biographies of the most
respected historians, as well as diaries and memoirs etc.
If I live to get it out -- it will devestate the current Gult War,
Afgan War and coming Iraq conquest -- because the
gameplan is exactly the same in each.
THis is the biggest revelation of history in the last
hundred years -- and damn it -- I have frittered away
my entire readership arguing poles with you and Harvey.
Obviously my departure from the smoking gun will
be trumpted on the pro-administration investigation
websites as my repudiation of the position, as
proof that I have backed away from my finding that
a small missile-firing jet was responsible for the
Pentagon mass murders.
THis letter is my only answer to that accusation.
It will be hard to see relinquish so much hard-fought-for
ground knowing that the Pentagon evidence has never
been shaken, is still the smoking gun -- but if
the fight gets so techical that people stop following it,
if I am personally warn down in a war of attrition against
a website that is always standing against me no matter
how many letters I hurl against it (e-letters are like
writing messages in the sand at the beach, remember --
you have to keep up the flow to keep your arguments
alive -- while the rich can make a fancy website, slick
and glossy and rich in graphic design and professionalis
that is full of misleadingly selected data, charts, photos etc.
and just sit back and take their out on the yacht while
I -- with no web links (except your link to my googlegroup
enemies) am expected to keep ramming my head against
this wall until nothing is left but a heap of bloody mush.
I guess you get the point.
Good luck in all you do.
And, rember to get my name and that damn link off your
site right away -- as a favor for old times sake.
With fond regard and appreciation for all the good you
have contributed in the cause of justice,
Dick Eastman
Yakima
Send Email
