Karl Marx, Engels, V. I Lenin and Mao may be brought the revolutions, and further revolutions would never come out through their very same ideologies,and their altruist practicalities. Because the new and developed version of philosophy and the new vision with revolutionary spirit under widened scope of mass bases for participation of the productive and non-productive forces of every society in every state, under visionary and collective leadership would be needed and all these would be proved as only solution for critical capitalism and helpless Marxism for new world of socialism in favor of poor, oppressed, down trodden and neglected sections of every state, for living with dignity and self respect in the world both in quality and in equality. Global alliances, would be played a key role in the newest form of unity as alternative force to the state in every field against capitalism. Moreover, socialist forces and the Islamic forces in global level, i think , would never make any alliance against the present capitalism. Because these two sections would never like to compromise with each other. Complete empirical study of the short lived Russian, and Chinese societies and their revolutionary role of that period would be a helpful tool to understand the real nature of the societies under the influence of the state to contribute the Marxist philosophy in the most realistic terms on the face of global capitalism towards the task of global socialism in the interest of suppressed, and proletariat class for living with dignity and self respect as humans in the global society. The Nepalese society and their contribution to the Marxism is undeniable reality in the progress of the society from feudal to capitalist by over throwing the monarchy,in the new century without touching the feudal and capitalist foundations of the society
Ayub Mohammed
http://www.articlesbase.com/authors/ayub-mohammed/386817
http://www.linkedin.com/pub/ayub-mohammed/16/3a9/4ba