Skip to search.
philosophy-il · Israeli Philosophy Group

Group Information

  • Members: 10
  • Category: Philosophy
  • Founded: Mar 10, 2002
  • Language: English
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Message search is now enhanced, find messages faster. Take it for a spin.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
The Legality of Discrimination   Message List  
Reply Message #81 of 173 |

Hi!

Some of you may be aware of my criticism of the "Encouraging Women in
Linux Howto":

http://www.advogato.org/person/shlomif/diary.html?start=130

This seemed like a good idea at this time, but brought some criticism from
fellow Haifuxers, and got me involved in a discussion with some members of
the LinuxChix issues mailing list about men, women, whatever in between
and Linux. I eventually posted a few corrections to my original post (read
the subsequent entries), but was also overwhelmed by the amount of
criticism I had to cope with.

In any case, one of the issues that surfaced in my discussion at the
"issues" mailing list was whether discrimination (against women, Black,
Jews, gay, etc) was something that should be tried to be prevented
legally. I believe the laws of a country cannot and must not discriminate
against gender, race, etc. Likewise, public instuitions can also not
enforce an anti-X (where X is Jews/Women/Homosexual/etc.) policy.

However, I don't see enacting laws that prevent private organizations
(such as companies or NPOs) to discriminate against individuals
on an invididual basis. My reasons are as follows:

1. It is perfectly legal to be a racist. My opinions on Jews, Women, Gay,
Black, Fat people or whatever, are not something that can be enforced or
should be enforced by the State at large. By all means I am free to hold
these opinions, however harmful, and I am free to act in accordance to
them. (as long as I don't do anything that is balantly illegal)

Note that I'm not saying racism is not an irrational and immature mental
and physical behaviour. It is, and it brings short term and long term harm
for those that hold it. But it's still perfectly legitimate to have. Law
should not enforce Morality.

2. Aside from Racism per-ce there are also generalizations that apply to a
certain minority. On average, an American Jew is more hard-working, more
intelligent and more successful than a Christian American. On average,
Black Americans are not as competent or successful as their white
counterparts. These are facts, backed up by many statistics. Making a
generalization based on them is not racist.

A discrimination out of generalization does not necessarily constitute as
Racism. In fact, such generalizations are often desirable to make sure
values are protected, and that the generalized minorities actually take an
active stand in correcting their situation. (or maintaining it if they are
above average)

3. An individual who is discriminated against and belong to such a
minority, may or may not be discriminated because of his gender/race/etc.
Furthermore, sometimes the discrimination may be sub-conscious or not
intentional. Passing laws that prevent discrimination against underlings,
(for example) may cause a lot of undesirable side-effects.

One example, is a discriminated employee going against a perfectly
enlightened boss, who did not realize he or she was discriminated or had a
got non-racist reason for doing so. Another is incompetent workers
of a minority trying to get jobs and then complaining about being
discriminated against.

Another is a racist (but otherwise perfectly productive) employer, who
does not wish to employ workers of a certain minority, because he knows he
will not treat them well. Being employed at such an establishment would be
a bad thing for both the employer and the employee.

4. There is the case of voluntary correcting discrimination. Like if you
get an application from a Black person who presents himself as an
exceptional black worker, and makes a very good impression. You might
prefer hiring him instead of a white applicant with otherwise similar
qualifications.


----------

Like I said earlier, the Government should not enforce
Morality. A government's job is to enforce Law and to prevent the
application of initiatory force, coercion or fraud. Everything else is not
something it should or need do. (albeit many left-winged people would
claim otherwise).

Trying to prevent discrimination constitutionally will not do good in the
long run. Instead, it can provide fuel for harassing otherwise innocent
people who are trying to live their lives, or otherwise try to
actually correct things.

Regards,

Shlomi Fish

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Shlomi Fish shlomif@...
Home Page: http://t2.technion.ac.il/~shlomif/

My opinions may seem crazy, but they all make sense. Insane sense, but
sense nonetheless.





Mon Apr 7, 2003 1:25 pm

shlomif2
Online Now Online Now
Send Email Send Email

Message #81 of 173 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

Hi! Some of you may be aware of my criticism of the "Encouraging Women in Linux Howto": http://www.advogato.org/person/shlomif/diary.html?start=130 This seemed...
Shlomi Fish
shlomif2 Online Now Send Email
Apr 7, 2003
1:25 pm

Hi, At his elaborated post, Shlomi managed to avoid the main issue. While racism is possible and will always be possible, and while it can be useful to...
Chen Shapira
shenkaisr Offline Send Email
Apr 7, 2003
2:16 pm

... I agree that active (i.e: conscious and deliberate) discrimination has bad effects on both sides. En masse, it may have bad effects on society as a whole....
Shlomi Fish
shlomif2 Online Now Send Email
Apr 9, 2003
2:49 pm

... Something similar to what you say here is what torn the United States into a civil war 140 years or so ago. The issue was whether states should be allowed...
Nadav Har'El
nyharel Offline Send Email
Apr 7, 2003
8:51 pm

Nadav, I was quite appaled for your post. I dare say that you should check out the definition of Liberalism (true Liberalism, not modern day "liberals" who...
Shlomi Fish
shlomif2 Online Now Send Email
Apr 9, 2003
2:13 pm

I wonder if this is a personal argument between Shlomi and me, or if anyone else is reading this... ... Hmm, I didn't think it was that appalling ;) ... What...
Nadav Har'El
nyharel Offline Send Email
Apr 9, 2003
4:02 pm

... I wrote this statement before I knew Chen was into the discussion too :) Sorry. -- Nadav Har'El | Wednesday, Apr 9 2003, 8...
Nadav Har'El
nyharel Offline Send Email
Apr 9, 2003
4:10 pm

Hi Nadav! I read your recent reply and have plenty to say. Nevertheless, it is quite late now (21:00) and I have to wake up early tomorrow. I will write back. ...
Shlomi Fish
shlomif2 Online Now Send Email
Apr 9, 2003
6:17 pm

... You are very right that it government intervention is a slippery slope. If the citizens do not agree on what is moral and what is not, the consequences...
Nadav Har'El
nyharel Offline Send Email
Apr 9, 2003
9:42 pm

... Sorry to be nitpicking about my own post, but I listened to the actual audio, and found that this quote I found by random googling was close, but not 100%...
Nadav Har'El
nyharel Offline Send Email
Apr 11, 2003
7:25 am

... Nadav, there's a small inconsistency in your reasoning. You're saying that because: 1. Martin Luther King said Abe Lincoln was a great man. and 2. Martin...
Shlomi Fish
shlomif2 Online Now Send Email
Apr 11, 2003
1:22 pm

... No, that was not my reasoning. My reasoning was that Martin Luther King was a greatly admired person whose speeches represented the thoughts of a lot of...
Nadav Har'El
nyharel Offline Send Email
Apr 11, 2003
2:27 pm

Hi, I'm disregarding most of your content, because I think we should clarify some vocabulary first. The definition of "illegal" is "something done against the...
Chen Shapira
shenkaisr Offline Send Email
Apr 9, 2003
2:28 pm

... Not according to my dictionary... I define an illegal action as anything that is _objectively_ illegal. There is such thing as an Objective Law. Let's not...
Shlomi Fish
shlomif2 Online Now Send Email
Apr 9, 2003
2:38 pm

... And you say that discrimination doesn't hurt people? ________________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned...
Chen Shapira
shenkaisr Offline Send Email
Apr 9, 2003
2:46 pm

... <sigh /> WiJG? Discrimination does hurt people. But so will you approaching me and shouting at my face: "Shlomi - you are a complete, fat, bastard, loser!"...
Shlomi Fish
shlomif2 Online Now Send Email
Apr 9, 2003
2:56 pm

... I agree that if there is no discrimination, there is no need for laws against it. But in case it will happen, don't you think that the right thing to do is...
Chen Shapira
shenkaisr Offline Send Email
Apr 9, 2003
3:11 pm

... I believe it won't happen. It's like saying a free, enlightened man will willingly discriminate against black, gays, Jews, or whatever. He would not...
Shlomi Fish
shlomif2 Online Now Send Email
Apr 15, 2003
6:32 am

... Shlomi, this is bull. Again, you can take the south in the US from the 1920s to 1950s. In this period, every white man and woman was free ("enlightened" is...
Nadav Har'El
nyharel Offline Send Email
Apr 15, 2003
8:48 am

... I don't know too much about the south in the US from the 20's to the 50's, or how free or enlightened the people were. ... Free? Germany was enslaved to...
Shlomi Fish
shlomif2 Online Now Send Email
Apr 16, 2003
9:02 am

... But the people of Germany were relatively free to choose many different courses of action. They could have even chosen to wage another war against france,...
Nadav Har'El
nyharel Offline Send Email
Apr 16, 2003
10:18 pm

... 1. I was mainly talking about a free and enlightened individual rather than a "free" society. 2. It seems we disagree if Germany was free enough, or had...
Shlomi Fish
shlomif2 Online Now Send Email
Apr 27, 2003
1:53 pm

Shlomi, you sound like an narsissic, indoctrinated, ignorant idiot. However, since it doesn't contradict the freedom of speech, I cannot stop you from doing...
Omer Musaev
eomer_mussaev Offline Send Email
Apr 9, 2003
5:52 pm

... LOL. I can assure you that although a little narcisitic I am not indoctrinated, ignorant or an idiot. My opinions are unusual in a way, and very much ...
Shlomi Fish
shlomif2 Online Now Send Email
Apr 9, 2003
5:53 pm

Even though I don't agree with you at all, I thing I understand you. However, how being a public company changes anything in your opinion? ... From: Shlomi...
Ofir Carny
Ofir@... Send Email
Apr 10, 2003
6:24 am

I prefer "Those that don't understand Objectivism may adopt it" ;) By the way, I think unconstitutional is even worse than illegal. We don't have a...
Ofir Carny
Ofir@... Send Email
Apr 10, 2003
6:50 am
Advanced

Copyright © 2010 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines NEW - Help