During the 1940s and 1950s, Stanislaw Jaskowski and Newton da Costa
independently showed that inconsistency in a logic need not be
identified with triviality. They devised formal logics to serve as
bases of inconsistent yet non-trivial theories.
The study of these paraconsistent calculi, as they have been called
since the 1970s, has evolved into a highly complex enterprise.
Philosophy, the foundations of mathematics, computer science,
theoretical modern physics, linguistics, and the numerous branches of
logic have been influenced by it. In 1991, Mathematical Reviews started
a new section (03B53) with the name "paraconsistent logic".
Hà a level of metatheory ZFC is inconsistent. The proof of it The unexpected fact, leans on that standard in the theory Models the assumption, that set of
To those interested in the applications of Paraconsistency to such fields as Linguistics (specially the Semantics of natural languages), you can take a look at