My impression is that if a previous notice is given to rescind something then that has to happen at the next meeting. My reading of RONR doesn't seem to...
Another factor would be the status of the motion to rescind. If it was on a prepared agenda for the very next meeting and distributed but never arrived at (in...
Previous notice as applied to motions means a requirement that an announcement that the motion will be introduced must be included in the call of the meeting...
... Well, we don't have an adjourned meeting, so in the ordinary meeting way of doing things we now have a situation where the previous notice has lapsed, I'd...
Four members of our LSB do not give any other contact information to the LSB list other than an email address, and/or a phone number. One gives the station...
Article 15, Section 1 of the Pacifica bylaws says, "Unless otherwise expressly provided in these Bylaws, all elections by the Members, Delegates, Directors,...
I'm not understanding the proposed scenario. IF notice were given that a motion was to be made at a meeting but in that meeting the motion was not made,...
The contact information given to the LSB "list" has of no official status. What has legal status is the contact information given to the secretary of the LSB....
But doesn't unfinished business AUTOMATICALLY roll over into new business for the following meeting? My understanding, after consulting with some folks on the...
... Yes. We agree. Unfortunately, the WBAI LSB Chair, after waffling various ways on this issue, declared that how the voting was done was up to the Staff...
Paul, Last year, the KPFT LSB violated Robert's Rules of Order right and left, sometimes tearing breaches in members' rights. I appealed to the PNB during its...
Once again sour grapes are expressed as fact. Roberts Rules were adhered to under the capable diretion of Mike Martin. There are records on the KPFT web site...
To the moderator of Pacifica Parl: The post below impugns the motives of the previous speaker, and I request the individual posting be publicly reminded of the...
Well I was away from the list for several days and I see this request. It is a close call whether the term "sour grapes" is an attack on motive. Webster's...
Q: Can the chair of the LSB rule a motion out of order where the motion seeks to evaluate a programming decision of the General Manager and express an opinion...
Q: Is an Incidental Main Motion a Main Motion? Pages 452-453 of the Rules of Order say that Main Motions should be recorded in the minutes and that Subsidiary...
Q1: May an LSB Quorum Meet Informally to Caucus? Q2: May a Director Poll Delegates by Phone? Although open meeting requirements have been previously discussed...
If the PNB failed to follow the procedures described in the bylaws for electing a chair, could a member of the board raise a point of order at any time during...
Found this in the public domain version of Robert's I don't know if it exists in the current edition, but looked like part of your answer. TC 37.... ...votes...
"...or where it is in the nature of a contract and the other party is informed of the fact..." One could argue that the votes to make management disclose...
Is there a difference? if so, "nevermind!" However, it occured to me that if they are equivalent, then Bob Lederer should not have been allowed to offer a...
Let's say that at an LSB meeting someone springs without notice a motion to "suspend" a member's membership from the LSB for six months. Let's say that the...
My understanding is that if you have 3 missed meetings without an excused absence you"Shall" be removed. My approach to this wouldbe to bring it up at the...
Actually, after reading the article again, I'm not sure that a vote is required. This could be cleaned up in the bylaws convention I hope. TC ... From: T. C....
The existing language seems pretty clear that a vote is _not_ required. The member shall be removed under five conditions. The last two of the conditions occur...
The response below misses the point of the query. The question about missing 3 meetings was not the cause of the suspension but a question about the effect of...
First, remember that Article 4, Section 9, is about "removal" not about suspension. Second, the removal under the first three subsections (A), (B), and (C)...