|
|
Visit the
Groups blog for the latest Yahoo! Groups information
Description
|
--- This group is a resource on parliamentary procedure and governance issues for people involved in the boards and committees of the Pacifica Foundation, a radio network with five stations in Berkeley CA (KPFA), Los Angeles CA (KPFK), Houston TX (KPFT), New York NY (WBAI) and Washington DC (WPFW). This group is NOT officially connected to the Pacifica Foundation in any way and is set up to be a self-help resource for the members of the Pacifica Foundation.
--- Pacifica Bylaws establish Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised as the parliamentary authority governing the Foundation (Art. 16). The rules of the section on "Decorum in Debate" of Robert's Rules of Order Newly Revised (RONR 10th p. 379, l. 23 to p. 382, l. 12) will govern the conduct of discussions in this group.
--- This list may be used to ask questions about the governance of Pacifica or any parliamentary questions related to Pacifica meetings of boards or committees. Questions may be asked in the hypothetical. Anyone may attempt to answer another’s question, bearing in mind that the best answers are those that provide the citation to Robert’s Rules, the Bylaws, or the California Corporation Code as applicable.
--- The list will be open to public reading, but since Pacifica has approximately 100,000 members, only listener and staff members of Pacifica, or of a Pacifica associate or affiliate station, may become members of this group for posting privileges.
--- The moderator is Gregory Wonderwheel, a California attorney and parliamentarian. Any comments or replies on this list by Mr. Wonderwheel are NOT LEGAL ADVICE and NO ATTORNEY CLIENT RELATIONSHIP may to be assumed or is created by participation in this list.
|
Re: "Any and All"
... No, I do not. ... Unfortunately, the distinction between Delegates and LSB Members is not as clear in the approved draft of the Pacifica Bylaws as it
Posted - Sat Oct 31, 2009 9:14 am
|
Terry Goodman
slyde_phaeder
Offline Send Email
|
Re: To meet or not to meet?
On Fri, 30 Oct 2009, Tracy Rosenberg wrote: <snip> ... <snip> I dissent from this interpretation, but agreement with my interpretation doesn't necessarily mean
Posted - Sat Oct 31, 2009 4:51 am
|
Terry Goodman
slyde_phaeder
Offline Send Email
|
Re: "Any and All"
Boy-- I'd hate to face you in a court! U do this for a living? I tried to read the Bylaws on this. I was impressed that the Delegates were introduced first,
Posted - Fri Oct 30, 2009 8:09 am
|
hobces
Offline Send Email
|
Re: "Any and All"
On 27 Oct 2009, Albert Solomon wrote: <snip> ... Nope. The LSB has no removal authority except for its committees and no recall authority except for its
Posted - Fri Oct 30, 2009 1:09 am
|
Terry Goodman
slyde_phaeder
Offline Send Email
|
Re: "Any and All"
To ALL: I listened to the Natl Governance Comm last meeting - I can't believe this measure to punitively disempower directors from a particular station is
Posted - Wed Oct 28, 2009 6:16 am
|
hobces
Offline Send Email
|
Add pacificaparl to your personalized My Yahoo! page What's This?
|
Message History
Group Email Addresses
| Post message: |
pacificaparl@yahoogroups.com |
| Subscribe: |
pacificaparl-subscribe@yahoogroups.com |
| Unsubscribe: |
pacificaparl-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com |
| List owner: |
pacificaparl-owner@yahoogroups.com |
|