Every country or region has campaigns and elections, even if they are only propaganda campaigns or rigged elections (the people have a way of eventually unrigging these). The conspiracy theories, parties and groups, and political debates involved, be they world politics, U.S. politics or otherwise, require a new "open" ethic thanks to the Internet.
This has already had a significant effect: global NGOs like Greenpeace run open campaigns via the web at act.greenpeace.org; G7 political parties like the Green Party of Canada run an open policy debate and platform drafting wiki at lp.greenparty.ca; There are efforts to define "global simultaneous policy" at http://simpol.org - and similar efforts planned by the Global Greens at http://globalgreens.info
What does this mean? How do open content, free software, share alike and other licensing affect political forums ?
How can local issue forums, or party forums, be kept democratically controlled and avoid becoming controlled by a small clique that uses technical means to control or censor debate? How can this open-LOOKING politics be prevented from degrading into a particularly noixous form of technocratic "politics as usual"?
http://www.guardian.co.uk/guardianpolitics/story/0,,2009974,00.html The UK government has decisively sided with so-called 'trolls' in the battle to determine
This is useful to outline the pre-requisites to adopting open politics methods in a developed English-speaking country. Note in particular the way libel laws
Why Nothing Can Ever Change =========================== Craig Hubley, 2007-02-02 (Groundhog Day) Many activists spend their lives pursuing change in the
Note: forwarded message attached. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection
I've contributed to four ways to use wiki technology to illustrate and focus debate on political issues. Just as a start to a lexicon, they are differentiated