Hi All,
I'm just sending this out as a general query... in case someone has an
answer or can point me in the right direction....

I'm interested in learning electronics - but in a practical way so that I
can construct my own simple circuit boards, etc.

I'm particularly interested in doing something practical, after hours, in
Johannesburg...

But if anyone has any experience in electronics and can give advice I'd
appreciate it.

One of my co-workers said he did a part-time course over a few months and
that's how he learned. He went on to design and sell a computer system
which hooks up to petrol pumps.
The problem is... that the place he went and did the part-time practical
course with... actually went out of business!!! (Typical)...  So I'm
trying to find something similar...
If anyone has any ideas or suggestions... just fire away...

I know there are correspondence courses... but I'm not sure if that will
be as effective...

Cheers,
Jan

Friends, activists and members:

We need your help to make and keep the private Old Right Yahoo Group a resource
for spirited interaction. Since our goal is to encourage interaction among
America First Populism, we request you recommend new candidates.

Need to know who they are, their email address, and general idea about their
politics.

The most frequent reason for people leaving the group is the volume of messages
from the default individual mail settings. Daily Digests usually resolves most
traffic issues. Or Special Notice settings allows special announcements from
SARTRE. NO email, would allow reading messages on the group from their web urls
and posting to the group.

Need help with the settings, drop me instructions and I will make modifications
from this end.

Identification of time sensitive or priority posts can be accomplished with
placing the following codes at the beginning of the subject line:

Breaking News for immediate reading:  ###
High Priority Message:  ^^^

Remember to place any changes in the subject line if you are using the reply key
to an existing message.

Our editorial perspective reflects a paleoconservative viewpoint. The Old Right
Yahoo Group is a place for like minded thinkers. Screening unfamiliar applicants
is minimal. However, we request that disruptive seekers find another home.

Vigorous debate and free speech are honored, and will not be suppressed.
However, this is a private group open to public membership. Standards of civil
conduct will be observed, for the privileged of continued association.

Yahoo groups are subject to Yahoo approval, so keep that in mind before you
cross any lines that risk a review for imprudent behavior.

BREAKING ALL THE RULES   http://batr.org   publishes original essays by SARTRE
on the 'Strappado Wrack', the 'View from the Mount', Global Gulag, the 'Dueling
Twins', Varying Verity and Solitary Purdah. Political Commentary that Thomas
Jefferson to Voltaire would read with sober essays and provocative articles on
Politics, Foreign Policy, Markets, Media, Law, Education, Culture, Society,
Philosophy and Religion. Sprinkled with Wit, Satire and Sarcasm. The Existential
approach to beguile and understand current events.

Old Right  http//oldright.com    uses RSS transfer and appears in directories
and has XML linkage. Old Right will be promoted. Visit it often for daily
updates.

Any ideas, suggestions or criticism are welcomed. Get involved, grow our ranks,
post often and share quality INFO.

All the best,

SARTRE - Publisher of BREAKING ALL THE RULES http://batr.org

by Steven Ertelt
October 31, 2004

Steven Ertelt is the Editor and CEO of LifeNews.com.

For pro-life advocates, the choice in this November's presidential elections is clear: President George W. Bush deserves your vote.

President Bush has compiled a record during his first term in office that can only be described as extraordinarily pro-life. And, when it comes to the key battles and judicial appointments over the next four years, only President Bush can be trusted to advance the cause of life.

From the moment President Bush was inaugurated, he began implementing pro-life policy.

On his first day in office, he reinstituted the Mexico City Policy that prohibits taxpayer funding of groups that perform or promote abortions in other countries. Not only did he bring back the policy that Bill Clinton ditched, he expanded it to include any funding given to groups in the entire State Department budget and threatened to veto Congressional legislation that overturned his decision.

ABORTION: On abortion issues, President Bush has been a solid pro-life advocate. He signed the ban on partial-birth abortions -- the first legislation since the Roe v. Wade decision that made any type of abortion illegal. Abortion advocates have sued to overturn the ban and the Bush administration has solidly defended it in court.

President Bush also signed the Born Alive Infants Protection Act. The measure makes sure that unborn children who survive botched abortions receive proper medical care instead of being left to die or purposefully killed after birth.

Bush has also repeatedly denied federal funds to the UNFPA. This is a UN agency that has supported Chinese population control officials when they force women to have abortions or parents to be sterilized because they want more than one child.

Most importantly, President Bush has nominated pro-life judges to important federal court positions. This signals that he will appoint judges to the Supreme Court that will give the pro-life community a chance to overturn Roe vs. Wade.

The next president could determine the legalization of abortion for the next 30 years via Supreme Court appointments. Bush's consistently in appointing judges who are pro-life or will uphold the pro-life laws that are passed is good news for the future.

HELPING WOMEN: Despite claims by abortion advocates that John Kerry is a better advocate for women, President Bush has done more for pregnant women.

Bush signed what became known as Laci and Conner's Law that protects pregnant women from tragic acts of violence. When a criminal assaults a pregnant woman and kills or injures her baby, common sense tells most people that there are two victims. The bill recognizes that fact and allows prosecutors to charge criminals for both crimes.

Sadly, John Kerry's common sense didn't kick in and he returned to Washington from the campaign trail specifically to vote against the bill, despite letters to him from Laci Peterson's parents and family backing it.

President Bush also helped pregnant women and their babies obtain medical care during the pregnancy. By allowing unborn children to be covered under the federal CHIP health insurance program, poor pregnant women could qualify for coverage.

Groups that help pregnant women cite the lack of medical insurance as one financial reason that compels some women to have abortions. Several states have signed on to the program and the number of abortions should drop as a result.

EMBRYONIC STEM CELL RESEARCH: President Bush has been thoroughly blasted for his August 2001 decision to prevent taxpayer funding of any new embryonic stem cell research conducted after that point.

John Kerry claims the policy prevented all funding of all research. Instead, while is seeks to defund new research destroying human life, Bush's policy authorized more than $190 million for adult stem cell research. That more ethical and effective alternative has already produced 140 treatments while not one single human patient has ever been cured from using embryonic stem cells.

Members of Congress and biotech lobbyists are working overtime to use your tax dollars to pay to destroy unborn children "left over" from in-vitro fertilization in order to obtain their stem cells. To his credit, President Bush has resisted calls to do that.

HUMAN CLONING: The pro-life community couldn't have asked for more from President Bush when it comes to opposing human cloning.

The president, on many occasions, vocally backed bills in Congress that would ban both forms of human cloning. The Bush administration also played a key role in promoting a human cloning ban treaty at the United Nations that will receive a second vote next month.

ASSISTED SUICIDE: President Bush has taken a clear stand against assisted suicide and euthanasia.

The Bush administration declared that federally controlled drugs could not be used in assisted suicides in the state of Oregon, the only state where the practice is legal. All of the assisted suicides there have involved such drugs. Attorneys for the president have vigorously defended the decision in court.

President Bush also has spoken out in favor of Terri Schiavo's family and their efforts to defend their daughter's right to live.

ABSTINENCE FUNDING: President Bush has strongly supported abstinence-only education. In addition to increasing funding, President Bush, in his January State of the Union address, called on Congress to triple the amount of money it is dedicating to these important programs.

JOHN KERRY: John Kerry's position on these key issues is clear. He will do everything in his power to advocate abortion and pay for it with your tax dollars. He would overturn the Mexico City Policy, fund the UNFPA, and back legislation that would overturn other pro-life policies.

John Kerry will also use your tax money to destroy human embryos for research, has said he supports assisted suicide, and would likely refuse expanding funding for abstinence education.

Kerry's commitment to a human cloning ban in Congress and at the UN is doubtful. He has already endorsed a "clone and kill" version that bans human cloning for reproduction but allows unborn children to be cloned and killed in research.

Most importantly, Kerry has repeatedly said he would appoint pro-abortion judges to key federal courts and pro-life advocates have no chance of a pro-life nominee to the Supreme Court during a Kerry administration.

Abortion will be legal, but certainly not safe or rare if John Kerry is elected.

VOTE FOR BUSH: President Bush is a man with clear pro-life values and he has taken every occasion during his presidency to implement public policy that values the dignity and worth of human life.

Important battles to protect human life are still to come and we need a president who will help turn back efforts to expand abortion, human cloning, destructive research, and assisted suicide.

That's why LifeNews.com encourages you to vote to re-elect President George W. Bush.

Related web sites: WeVoteProLife Voting Guide

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.782 / Virus Database: 528 - Release Date: 10/22/04

Pro-Life Advocates: Vote for President Bush

by Steven Ertelt
October 31, 2004

Steven Ertelt is the Editor and CEO of LifeNews.com.

For pro-life advocates, the choice in this November's presidential elections is clear: President George W. Bush deserves your vote.

President Bush has compiled a record during his first term in office that can only be described as extraordinarily pro-life. And, when it comes to the key battles and judicial appointments over the next four years, only President Bush can be trusted to advance the cause of life.

From the moment President Bush was inaugurated, he began implementing pro-life policy.

On his first day in office, he reinstituted the Mexico City Policy that prohibits taxpayer funding of groups that perform or promote abortions in other countries. Not only did he bring back the policy that Bill Clinton ditched, he expanded it to include any funding given to groups in the entire State Department budget and threatened to veto Congressional legislation that overturned his decision.

ABORTION: On abortion issues, President Bush has been a solid pro-life advocate. He signed the ban on partial-birth abortions -- the first legislation since the Roe v. Wade decision that made any type of abortion illegal. Abortion advocates have sued to overturn the ban and the Bush administration has solidly defended it in court.

President Bush also signed the Born Alive Infants Protection Act. The measure makes sure that unborn children who survive botched abortions receive proper medical care instead of being left to die or purposefully killed after birth.

Bush has also repeatedly denied federal funds to the UNFPA. This is a UN agency that has supported Chinese population control officials when they force women to have abortions or parents to be sterilized because they want more than one child.

Most importantly, President Bush has nominated pro-life judges to important federal court positions. This signals that he will appoint judges to the Supreme Court that will give the pro-life community a chance to overturn Roe vs. Wade.

The next president could determine the legalization of abortion for the next 30 years via Supreme Court appointments. Bush's consistently in appointing judges who are pro-life or will uphold the pro-life laws that are passed is good news for the future.

HELPING WOMEN: Despite claims by abortion advocates that John Kerry is a better advocate for women, President Bush has done more for pregnant women.

Bush signed what became known as Laci and Conner's Law that protects pregnant women from tragic acts of violence. When a criminal assaults a pregnant woman and kills or injures her baby, common sense tells most people that there are two victims. The bill recognizes that fact and allows prosecutors to charge criminals for both crimes.

Sadly, John Kerry's common sense didn't kick in and he returned to Washington from the campaign trail specifically to vote against the bill, despite letters to him from Laci Peterson's parents and family backing it.

President Bush also helped pregnant women and their babies obtain medical care during the pregnancy. By allowing unborn children to be covered under the federal CHIP health insurance program, poor pregnant women could qualify for coverage.

Groups that help pregnant women cite the lack of medical insurance as one financial reason that compels some women to have abortions. Several states have signed on to the program and the number of abortions should drop as a result.

EMBRYONIC STEM CELL RESEARCH: President Bush has been thoroughly blasted for his August 2001 decision to prevent taxpayer funding of any new embryonic stem cell research conducted after that point.

John Kerry claims the policy prevented all funding of all research. Instead, while is seeks to defund new research destroying human life, Bush's policy authorized more than $190 million for adult stem cell research. That more ethical and effective alternative has already produced 140 treatments while not one single human patient has ever been cured from using embryonic stem cells.

Members of Congress and biotech lobbyists are working overtime to use your tax dollars to pay to destroy unborn children "left over" from in-vitro fertilization in order to obtain their stem cells. To his credit, President Bush has resisted calls to do that.

HUMAN CLONING: The pro-life community couldn't have asked for more from President Bush when it comes to opposing human cloning.

The president, on many occasions, vocally backed bills in Congress that would ban both forms of human cloning. The Bush administration also played a key role in promoting a human cloning ban treaty at the United Nations that will receive a second vote next month.

ASSISTED SUICIDE: President Bush has taken a clear stand against assisted suicide and euthanasia.

The Bush administration declared that federally controlled drugs could not be used in assisted suicides in the state of Oregon, the only state where the practice is legal. All of the assisted suicides there have involved such drugs. Attorneys for the president have vigorously defended the decision in court.

President Bush also has spoken out in favor of Terri Schiavo's family and their efforts to defend their daughter's right to live.

ABSTINENCE FUNDING: President Bush has strongly supported abstinence-only education. In addition to increasing funding, President Bush, in his January State of the Union address, called on Congress to triple the amount of money it is dedicating to these important programs.

JOHN KERRY: John Kerry's position on these key issues is clear. He will do everything in his power to advocate abortion and pay for it with your tax dollars. He would overturn the Mexico City Policy, fund the UNFPA, and back legislation that would overturn other pro-life policies.

John Kerry will also use your tax money to destroy human embryos for research, has said he supports assisted suicide, and would likely refuse expanding funding for abstinence education.

Kerry's commitment to a human cloning ban in Congress and at the UN is doubtful. He has already endorsed a "clone and kill" version that bans human cloning for reproduction but allows unborn children to be cloned and killed in research.

Most importantly, Kerry has repeatedly said he would appoint pro-abortion judges to key federal courts and pro-life advocates have no chance of a pro-life nominee to the Supreme Court during a Kerry administration.

Abortion will be legal, but certainly not safe or rare if John Kerry is elected.

VOTE FOR BUSH: President Bush is a man with clear pro-life values and he has taken every occasion during his presidency to implement public policy that values the dignity and worth of human life.

Important battles to protect human life are still to come and we need a president who will help turn back efforts to expand abortion, human cloning, destructive research, and assisted suicide.

That's why LifeNews.com encourages you to vote to re-elect President George W. Bush.

Related web sites: WeVoteProLife Voting Guide

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com/).
Version: 6.0.782 / Virus Database: 528 - Release Date: 10/22/04

> ATTACHMENT part 2 image/jpeg name=presidentbush3.jpg

---

Big Media Drops the Mask

by Pat Buchanan (archive)

November 1, 2004 | Print | Send   
 
That 377 tons of high explosives went missing from an Iraqi munitions facility 30 miles south of Baghdad is a legitimate story.
 
But did it deserve to be the front-page, two-column headline lead in The New York Times? Did it merit being featured on "60 Minutes," 30 hours before Election Day, as CBS News planned? Or were these twin media mastodons colluding as conscious agents of the Kerry campaign?

These are not unfair questions -- for consider:

We now know that the explosives have been missing from Al Qaqaa for 18 months and that this was known by the U.S. government. We now know that the 377 tons represents less than one-tenth of one percent of the munitions U.S. forces have captured or destroyed.

We now know the explosives were probably moved before U.S. troops arrived. For it is hard to believe an organized theft of these explosives, involving hundreds of men and 40 trucks, each hauling 10 tons of high explosives, could have been carried out on Iraqi roads jammed with U.S. military vehicles after the fall of Baghdad.

Yet, thanks to CBS and the Times, Kerry was able, for three days of the last week of the campaign, to make a charge of presidential dereliction of duty that threw Bush off message and on the defensive.

According to Howard Kurtz of The Washington Post, CBS News' Jeff Fager pleaded with the Times' Bill Keller not to publish the story until 36 hours before voting began. Keller balked, saying this "wouldn't give the White House a fair opportunity to respond."

Which seems to be what CBS had in mind.

For the Los Angeles Times cites a CBS source as saying that Fager was "distraught" the story was not held until 30 hours before voting began. The CBS gang was out to finish off a president with an unanswerable charge on the eve of an election.

This is the second time this fall that CBS News and "60 Minutes" have used hyped or bogus stories to sink President Bush.

In September, Dan Rather and "60 Minutes" charged that Bush, while in the Texas Air National Guard, had been insubordinate, had refused orders to take a medical exam and had used influence to avoid being disciplined.

Within hours, it was shown that the "60 Minutes" exclusive was based on criminally fabricated and forged memos. Yet CBS has never retracted its story nor apologized to President Bush.

Nor has CBS explained why it did not tell the public that the memos had been questioned by the family of the officer who had supposedly written them; that CBS got them from a erratic, wacky, anti-Bush zealot, not an "unimpeachable" source as Rather had claimed; and that the ex-lieutenant governor who confessed to Rather he had gotten Bush into the Guard had previously said the opposite under oath.

And why was CBS maniacally pursuing a National Guard story that had been knocking around for a decade, while ignoring the new dynamite charges of the Swift Boat Vets that Kerry had lied about his combat record in Vietnam and colluded with communists? In August, the whole country was talking about the Swift Boat ads.

As Kurtz reports, the nonpartisan Project for Excellence in Journalism has now documented a media bias toward Kerry and an animus toward this president.

During the two-week period around the presidential debates, 59 percent of the stories about Bush on CBS, ABC, NBC, PBS's "News Hour," CNN and Fox News, and in The Washington Post and The New York Times were negative, but only 25 percent of the stories about John Kerry. One in three stories about Kerry was positive, but only one in seven about Bush. In the print media, 68 percent of the stories were negative on Bush, but only 26 percent were negative on Kerry.

Fox News was positive on Bush, but CNN's Aaron Brown's made Fox look like the profile of an ambivalent and undecided voter. According to Kurtz, citing the Project, "not a single CNN story was both dominated by and positive for President Bush." Not one.

After Paul Bremer said we did not send enough troops to Iraq, John Roberts, possible successor to Rather, said: "The famously disciplined Bush campaign appeared to trip all over itself trying to clean up the mess. ... A day of contradictory messages is not the way the Bush campaign wanted to go into this important debate."

With folks like Fager doing the choosing, Roberts should have the inside track to the anchor's chair.

In a revealing story, Slate, the Internet magazine, had its writers publicly name the man for whom each intended to vote and tell why. Five Slate writers named Bush, 45 named Kerry, a nine-to-one ratio. A poll of the national press would likely reach the same result.

This election has indeed revealed an "alternative media" of the right. But the national press remains what it has been since the 1960s: the most reliably left-wing voting block this side of Bedford Stuyvesant.

©2004 Creators Syndicate, Inc.

---

Contact Pat Buchanan | Read Buchanan's biography

Get an autographed copy!                   A Republic, Not an Empire     by Pat Buchanan  Your blood will chill as Patrick Buchanan ticks off the lengthening list of  U.S. military commitments abroad -- commitments that someday may  have to be honored with American blood. You can get this collectors' autographed edition now!

My reply on another list ....

 

I have no idea what this guy Dave is about, but his post reminded me of our bigger challenge: to get honest information into the mainstream debate.  Heck, we can't even seem to find a single honest Democrat who cares to debate real issues!  I think Zell Miller was the last one.  Lately, the political debate has become little more than a food fight, with morons like Michael Moore leading the charge.  No fault of Bush, of course.  But still, the congress can pass legislation to improve matters.  If, after the election,  we allow our discourse to keep free-falling to new lows, the nation will descend into a darkness we've probably not considered in our lifetimes. And if that retrograde level of debate takes grip on us, the war on terror will seem mild compared to our crisis within. 

 

We'd better watch it carefully.  After Bush retakes office, I want to see him speak to this issue .... it will take careful wordcraft but I think he can do it as well as anyone ... he is a great healer -- a great uniter. But then I hope we will also root out the problem at the core ... placing controls on what I call "licensed propaganda", in both the elementary schools and the "mainstrream media".  The problem is that many people cannot afford cable or satellite, and that's a large group of gullible people.  They believe liberal lies.

 

I mean, we see the grave damage of the Arab children being raised with anti-American brainwashing.  But what are American kids learning?  And if a major licensed broadcaster can be governed by decency laws to protect our children, can't we do the same for the blatantly dishonest propaganda?  The "news" that gets reported to the less educated segments of America.  There must be some standard of honesty and objectivity we can base laws on.  Certainly we can weed out the grossest deliberate misrepresentations.  If we can do it in court -- and we do, of course -- we can do it at FCC too.  Fair and balanced is not the issue.  It's lies vs.. truth I'm talking about here.  To be sure, there will always be issues in the gray zone, and those would remain, but the most flagrant falsehoods would be penalized.  Ultimately, all we need to do is let competition in the marketplace do its good deeds.  But short-term, unless we deregualate broadcasting altogether, those with the most powerful licenses and market reach will dominate to a damaging extent.  Can you imagine seeing the equivalent of FoxNews on all the major nets?  And all the major papers?

 

Now THAT is liberating a nation!  Of course, those in power know this too.  That's why its so hard to pull off.  But we keep pushing.

 

To even consider controlling political speech, of any kind, sounds a bit chilling but we do it now, in fact.  We can't afford to loose quality reporting.  We need to take that seriously too.  But there is a gross imbalance of influence the liberals have over those unable to afford quality information.  Look at the UN fiascos: the scams of the century.  The liberal media won't touch thsoe stories.  WHY???  This should scare the hell out of us.  And when we've got those willing accomplices in the media trying to trip the election, we've got problems much bigger than we've seen before.  Something must be done.   It shouldn't take a thrown election to wake us up.  We should have seen this train coming, and acted accordingly, for some time. 

 

So, what all this boils down to is:  regardless of what the political landscape looks like next year, we no longer have the luxury of pretending that liberals have some legitimate claim to moral equivalence.  Fair and balanced (and this is not just a reference to Fox) means a balance of reasonable competing ideas, but liberalism has been proved a lie for many decades now.  It represents a philosophy we reject as part of our foundational American creed.  It has no opposite to anything but truth itself.  It must cease or it will devour the whole nation like a malignant cancer.

 

 

Stephen

 

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.782 / Virus Database: 528 - Release Date: 10/22/04

From Our Writers

Hot Topics

Media Critiques

ChronWatch Forum

Fun Stuff

NutWatch

Copyright © 2004 ChronWatch. All rights reserved.

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.782 / Virus Database: 528 - Release Date: 10/22/04

Apply Systemic Unconventional Wisdom
Exodus to Canaan!

Leviticus » BeHar 

25:36 «Do not take advance [interest] or accrued interest from him.
Fear your God, and let your brother live alongside you.»  

Imagine That a Father at His Death Gave to Each of His Feuding Sons a Key to a Coffer.

With The Two Keys Together They Can Open the Safe and
Get an Equal Share of the Immense Fortune of Their Father as Their Heritage.

With Only One They Get Zilch, Nada, Nothing, Zero, Klum!

Worse, By Continuing Their Fight They Would Mutually Destroy Each Other.

They Have Their Free Choice:

The Brothers Can Chose to Make War and Get Nothing & Die

or

They Can Make Peace and Be Richer Than They Could Ever Dream!

If You Were One of These Brothers What Would You Do?

Which Key Is the Most Important?

Which of the Brothers the Father Preferred?

Abraham Is the Father,

Ishmael & Isaac Are the Sons,

Torah & Qu'ran Are the Keys

Activating Message for Exit & Security

Pax, Salaam, Peace, Shalom, Paz

Exodus » BeShalach

17:14 God said to Moses, 'Write this as a reminder in the Book and repeat it carefully to Joshua.
I will totally obliterate the memory of Amalek from under the heavens.'

17:15 Moses built an altar, and he named it God-is-my-Banner.

17:16 He said, 'The Hand is on God's Throne. God shall be at war with Amalek for all generations.'

Help US Shorten These Days of Penitence

Genesis » MiKets 42:8
«Joseph recognized his brothers, but they did not recognize him.»


Novus Ordo Seclorum?

«Too much will always be decided by those who do not know at all what they are talking about.»

Annuit Coeptis

Shalom "Sneyke" Patrick Hamou
Proxy# 2260406737

Office of the President of the Security Institute,

Department of Holy Land Security.
Cell: +972 (54) 441-7640
Sneyke@...
Sneyke@...

Kerry's Discharge Is Questioned by an Ex-JAG Officer

BY THOMAS LIPSCOMB - Special to the Sun

 

November 1, 2004

 

URL: http://www.nysun.com/article/4040

A former officer in the Navy's Judge Advocate General Corps Reserve has built a case that Senator Kerry was other than honorably discharged from the Navy by 1975, The New York Sun has learned.

The "honorable discharge" on the Kerry Web site appears to be a Carter administration substitute for an original action expunged from Mr. Kerry's record, according to Mark Sullivan, who retired as a captain in the Navy's Judge Advocate General Corps Reserve in 2003 after 33 years of service as a judge advocate. Mr. Sullivan served in the office of the Secretary of the Navy between 1975 and 1977.

On behalf of the Kerry campaign, Michael Meehan and others have repeatedly insisted that all of Mr. Kerry's military records are on his Web site atjohnkerry.com, except for his medical records.

"If that is the case," Mr. Sullivan said, "the true story isn't what was on the Web site. It's what's missing. There should have been an honorable discharge certificate issued to Kerry in 1975,if not earlier, three years after his transfer to the Standby Reserve-Inactive."

Another retired Navy Reserve officer, who served three tours in the Navy's Bureau of Personnel, points out that there should also have been a certified letter giving Mr. Kerry a choice of a reserve reaffiliation or separation and discharge. If Mr. Meehan is correct and all the documents are indeed on the Web site, the absence of any documents from 1972 to 1978 in the posted Kerry files is a glaring hole in the record.

The applicable U.S. Navy regulation, now found at MILPERSMAN 1920-210 "Types of Discharge for Officers," lists five examples of conditions required to receive an honorable discharge certificate, four required to receive a general discharge "not of such a nature as to require discharge under conditions other than honorable," and seven for "the lowest type of separation from the naval service. It is now officially in all respects equivalent to a dishonorable discharge."

Kerry spokesmen have also repeatedly said that the senator has an honorable discharge. And there is indeed a cover letter to an honorable discharge dated February 16,1978,on the Kerry Web site. It is in form and reference to regulation exactly the same as one granted Swiftboat Veterans for Truth member Robert Shirley on March 12, 1971, during a periodic "reduction in force (RIF)" by the Naval Reserve. The only significant difference between Mr. Kerry's and Mr. Shirley's is the signature information and the dates. In a RIF, officers who no longer have skills or are of an age group the Navy wishes to keep in reserve are involuntarily separated by the Navy and given their appropriate discharge. This is a normal and ongoing activity and there is no stigma attached to it.

Kerry spokesman David Wade did not reply when asked if Mr. Kerry was other than honorably discharged before he was honorably discharged.

"Mr. Meehan may well be right and all Mr. Kerry's military records are on his Web site," Mr. Sullivan said. "Unlike en listed members, officers do not receive other than honorable, or dishonorable, certificates of discharge. To the contrary, the rule is that no certificate will be awarded to an officer separated wherever the circumstances prompting separation are not deemed consonant with traditional naval concepts of honor. The absence of an honorable discharge certificate for a separated naval officer is, therefore, a harsh and severe sanction and is, in fact, the treatment given officers who are dismissed after a general court-martial."

With the only discharge document cited by Mr. Kerry issued in 1978, three years after the last date it should have been issued, the absence of a certificate from 1975 leaves only two possibilities. Either Mr. Kerry received an "other than honorable" certificate that has been removed in a review purging it from his records, or even worse, he received no certificate at all. In both cases there would have been a loss of all of Mr. Kerry's medals and the suspension of all benefits of service.

Certainly something was wrong as early as 1973 when Mr. Kerry was applying to law school.

Mr. Kerry has said, "I applied to Harvard, Boston University, and Boston College. I was extremely late. Only BC would entertain a late application."

It is hard to see why Mr. Kerry had to file an "extremely late" application since he lost the congressional race in Lowell, Mass., the first week of November 1972 and was basically doing nothing until he entered law school the following September of 1973.A member of the Harvard Law School admissions committee recalled that the real reason Mr. Kerry was not admitted was because the committee was concerned that because Mr. Kerry had received a less than honorable discharge they were not sure he could be admitted to any state bar.

The fact that Mr. Kerry had cancelled his candidacy for a Congressional seat in 1970 in favor of Father Robert Drinan cannot have hurt Mr. Kerry's admission to Boston College. The Reverend Robert Drinan's previous position was dean of the Boston College Law School.

Given this, it is likely that a legal review took place that effectively purged Mr. Kerry's Navy files and arranged for the three-year-late honorable discharge in 1978.There were two avenues during the 1977-1978 time period. This could have been under President Carter's Executive Order 11967, under which thousands received pardons and upgrades for harsh discharges or other offenses under the Selective Service Act. Or it might have merged into efforts by the military to comply with the demands of the 1975 Church Committee. Mr. Sullivan was personally involved in the 1976 and 1977 records review answering Senator Kennedy's demands to determine the scope of any counterintelligence abuses by the military.

In the Foreign Surveillance Act of 1977, legislation introduced by Mr. Kennedy to enforce the findings of the Church Committee, there is language that literally describes the behavior of Mr. Kerry. The defined behavior that could no longer be subject to surveillance without warrants includes: "Americans having contact with foreign powers in the case of Americans who were active in the protest against U.S. involvement in Vietnam. Some of them may have attended international conferences at which there were representatives of foreign powers, as defined in the bill, or may have been directly in communication with foreign governments concerning this issue."

One of Mr. Kerry's first acts of office as he entered the Senate on January 3, 1985, was making sure what was still in the Navy files. A report was returned to Mr. Kerry by a Navy JAG on January 25, 1985, and appears on the Kerry Web site. There is an enclosure listed that may have contained a list of files, according to David Myers, the JAG who prepared it, that is not on Mr. Kerry's Web site. It could have provided an index for all of Mr. Kerry's Navy files.

All officials with knowledge of what specifically happened in Mr. Kerry's case are muzzled by the Privacy Act of 1974.The act makes it a crime for federal employees to knowingly disclose personal information or records.

Only Mr. Kerry can do that. As of this writing, Mr. Kerry has failed to sign a Standard Form 180 giving the electorate and the press access to his Navy files.

 

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.782 / Virus Database: 528 - Release Date: 10/22/04

A third document provides more context, showing that Kerry's 1971 press conference calling on President Nixon to accept the seven-point plan presented by Viet Cong leader Madame Binh aligned with Hanoi's carefully crafted agenda.

Monday, November 1, 2004

ELECTION

Why Every U.S. Christian Must Vote in This Election

By Rick Warren

Saddleback Church

CBN.com – Tuesday, November 2nd, will be the most important election Americans have had in 50 years. How can that be?

Because up to four of the nine Supreme Court justices will likely retire during the next presidential term, and their replacements will be selected by whoever is the next president. These new judges will affect the future of America for at least the next 40 years. It would be difficult to overestimate the impact that these judges will have on our lives, our families, our culture and the direction of this nation.

Presidents serve for only four years -- eight at the most, so their impact is limited. Supreme Court justices, however, serve for life, and they are the ones who decide on issues like abortion, gay "marriages," human cloning, harvesting babies for stem-cell research, revoking the tax exemption of churches, removing “under God” from the Pledge of Allegiance and “In God We Trust” from our money. In most ways, the Supreme Court has far more influence and impact on our day-to-day lives. This extremely important fact has been overlooked in most of the campaigning.

President Bush and Senator Kerry have VERY different opinions about the type of people who should become Supreme Court justices. They could not have more opposite views about these matters, and each man will shape the court in very different ways.

If the members of our congregations fail to vote on Tuesday, we are actually surrendering our responsibility to choose the direction of our country for the next 40 years. If we do not vote, we have no right to criticize or complain when unbiblical decisions are made by the court in the decades ahead.

Over the past several months at Saddleback, we’ve been urging our members each week to register to vote. We even arranged to have a voter registration booth set up on our church patio because we believe it’s that important that every Christian citizen exercise his or her right to vote for those who will govern us.

During the last presidential election in the United States, there were about 4 million Christians who weren’t even registered to vote! To me, that is inexcusable when you consider what the Bible says about our responsibility as citizens and when you consider the many, many men and women who’ve given their lives to provide and protect our freedom to vote.

The U.S. election of 2000 was a clear reminder that every vote counts, and that every voter has a duty to be involved. This point is true whether you are a U.S. citizen or whether you are a citizen of one of the many other countries that follow the principles of democracy.

As church leaders, we know our congregations are not allowed to endorse specific candidates, and it’s important for us to recognize that there can be multiple opinions among Bible-believing Christians when it comes to debatable issues such as the economy, social programs, Social Security, and the war in Iraq.

But for those of us who accept the Bible as God's Word and know that God has a unique, sovereign purpose for every life, I believe there are five issues that are non-negotiable. To me, they’re not even debatable because God's Word is clear on these issues. In order to live a purpose-driven life -- to affirm what God has clearly stated about his purpose for every person he creates -- we must take a stand by finding out what the candidates believe about these five issues, and then vote accordingly.

Here are five questions to ask when considering who to vote for in this election:

1. What does each candidate believe about abortion and protecting the lives of unborn children?

2. What does each candidate believe about using unborn babies for stem-cell harvesting?

3. What does each candidate believe about homosexual "marriage"?

4. What does each candidate believe about human cloning?

5. What does each candidate believe about euthanasia -- the killing of elderly and invalids?

Please, please do not forfeit your responsibility on these crucial issues! This election REALLY counts more than most.

Be sure to vote, and also be sure to encourage every Christian you know to vote on Tuesday. If you are able to vote early, do so. Then ask all your Christian friends on Tuesday, “Have you voted yet?” and pray for godly leaders to be elected.

More perspectives on CBN.com.

Article by Rick Warren, the founding pastor of Saddleback Church in Lake Forest, CA. Rick is author of The Purpose Driven Life and The Purpose Driven Church, and founder of Pastors.com, a global Internet community for those in ministry. Copyright (c) 2004 Pastors.com, Inc. Used with permission. All rights reserved.

The Christian Broadcasting Network, Inc. © 2004

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.782 / Virus Database: 528 - Release Date: 10/22/04

---

From: G. Ellard

To: oldright@yahoogroups.com

Sent: Monday, November 01, 2004 11:03 PM

Subject: Re: Att: Stephen Old Right Why Every U.S. Christian Must Vote in This Election

Stephen, on the one hand it appears that you're pulling for Bush because he's a Christian, but on the other it appears that you favor his re-election because you're being pragmatic, and thus consider him to be the lesser of two evils

 

While driving past a church a few months ago I saw a yard sign that simply read:  THE LESSER OF TWO EVILS IS STILL EVIL.  That message confirmed to me that my vote would go for someone other than either of the two candidates who have monopolized the press, for I consider both of them to be evil to the core.

 

Yes, I'm voting for Peroutka, and I don't consider that my vote will have been wasted. 

 

From: WWW.AfricanCrisis.Org
[This is absolutely fascinating. The original quotes are about the USA
and they are from: Alexis de Tocqueville. He wrote this in 1838. The
writer below is an Israeli Right Wing Thinker. His comments are most
interesting - but they apply to the USA too.

There is an addendum of my own I'd like to add. In ancient times,
Carthage and Rome engaged in a great clash which eventually resulted in
the Romans winning. Not many people may realise this but Carthage back
then was much like the USA - a commercial empire where people had no
value for patriotism. In the end, it was the Romans, with their patriotic
attitude who one. The Carthaginians had one of the finest generals of all
time - Hannibal - who invaded Italy and struck to the heart of Rome. At
Cannae he slaughtered an entire Roman army to the man in the greatest
defeat Rome ever knew.

How did the Romans respond? The Romans forbade women from crying in
public. The word "PEACE" was FORBIDDEN... instead... Hannibal and the
Romans fought it out in Italy for 14 years before he was driven from
Italy. During that time, the unappreciative, lazy, commercialised
Carthaginians never once sent him reinforcements, nor appreciated a
fraction of what he did.

Eventually, the Romans invaded north Africa and defeated and destroyed
Carthage. In that way... the might Commercial Empire of Carthage was
wiped out... because it just did not have the strategic sense that the
Romans had.

Today, the Western world is filled with people who think that money is
everything. The Russians, Chinese and Muslims know better... they know
that force of arms will be the ultimate deciding factor. Jan]

“Revolution”
By Prof. Paul Eidelberg

Whenever I go to the States, someone inevitably asks me, “Why hasn’t
there been a revolution in Israel?”  The questioner usually adds, “We
Americans would never tolerate a Government that would surrender our land
to any regime, and nor would any other self-respecting country.”

So I refer him to Alexis de Tocqueville’s 1838 classic Democracy in
America, which explains why democracies rarely engage in revolution.
The primary reason is this.  The principle of inequality underlies almost
every revolution, which principle, however, is lacking in a democracy.
And even if one maintains, as does the present writer, that Israel is not
an authentic democracy, nevertheless this country has a democratic
mentality.  This mentality is fostered by equality of conditions, in
consequence of which no one is tied to the station of his birth, and
anyone may, in principle, ascend the economic and political scale.

Moreover, like most democracies, Israel is a middle class society.  Most
people possess sufficient property to the desire the maintenance of
order.  “Not only,” says de Tocqueville, “are the men of democracies not
naturally desirous of revolutions, but they are afraid of them.  All
revolutions more or less threaten the tenure of property; but most of
those who live in democratic countries … not only possess property, but
they live in the condition where men set the greatest store upon their
property.”

Furthermore, commercial societies – and Israel is a commercial society --
are the most opposed to revolution.   “Commerce,” says de Tocqueville,
“is naturally adverse to violent passions; it loves to temporize, takes
delight in compromise … is patient, flexible, and never has recourse to
extreme measures until obliged by the most absolute necessity.”

The great French philosopher probes even deeper. “It will rarely happen
to any man in a democratic community suddenly to frame a system of
notions very remote from that which his contemporaries have adopted; and
if some such innovator appeared, I apprehend that he would have great
difficulty in finding listeners, still more in finding believers.  When
the conditions of men are almost equal, they do not easily allow
themselves to be persuaded by one another.  As they all live in close
intercourse, as they have learned the same things together, and as they
lead the same life, they are not naturally disposed to take one of
themselves for a guide and to follow him implicitly.”

In other words, deference is not to be expected in egalitarian democratic
societies.  Indeed, “Not only is confidence in the superior attainments
of certain individuals weakened among democratic nations … but the
general notion of the intellectual superiority which any man whatsoever
may acquire in relation to the rest of the community is soon
overshadowed.   As men grow more like each other, the doctrine of the
equality of the intellect gradually infuses itself into their opinions,
and it becomes more difficult for any innovators to acquire or to exert
much influence over the minds of a people.”

De Tocqueville had mixed feelings about the improbability of revolutions
in democracies.  As equality of conditions becomes so manifest and the
love of property so ardent, “I cannot but fear that men may arrive at
such a state as to regard every new theory as a peril, every innovation
as an irksome toil, and every social improvement as a stepping-stone to
revolution, and so refuse to move altogether for fear of being moved too
far.  I dread, I confess it, lest they should at last so entirely give
way to a cowardly love of present enjoyment as to lose sight of the
interests of their future selves and those of their descendants and
prefer to glide along the easy current of life rather than to make, when
it is necessary, a strong and sudden effort to a higher purpose.”

To all this my American interlocutors would say:  “But your very survival
is at stake when your Government surrenders Israel’s strategic assets to
the PLO.  What is the relevance to Israel of de Tocqueville’s admittedly
brilliant analysis when you have some 230,000 Jews in Judea and Samaria
who face ethnic cleansing, as well as the prospect of a hostile Arab
state within a stone’s throw of your population centers?”

To this I respond by saying that de Tocqueville’s analysis is fully
applicable to Israel, and rendered more so by certain traits of the
Jewish people!  But not to leave my interlocutors in despair, I point out
that the Jewish Sages foresaw the impact of democracy on Israel, but held
that democracy is a necessary but passing stage of Israel’s complete
redemption.  Democracy, with its indiscriminate egalitarianism or
nihilism, will be the gravedigger of Western civilization, and with its
passing, Israel will come into its own.

No doubt this will not leave most readers satisfied.  But one should not
expect more from a brief article.

From: WWW.AfricanCrisis.Org
[The following document has been doing the rounds. It appears to
originate from the SA Police. Jan]

HIJACKING AWARENESS GUIDE
1 November 2004
Prepared by: Inspector Riaan Steenkamp Elsburg SAPS
Sponsored By: Netstar

CONTENTS
1. INTRODUCTION 3
2. HOW TO AVOID A HIJACK SITUATION 3
2.1 Take Precautions: 3
2.2 Don’t Be Fooled By: 3
2.3 Know Your Environment : 3
3. HOW TO REDUCE THE RISK 4
3.1 When Entering Your Vehicle and While Driving: 4
3.2 When Parking Your Vehicle: 4
4. WHAT IS A SUSPICIOUS VEHICLE/PERSON? 5
4.1 Vehicles 5
4.2 Persons 5
5. QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS 5
5.1 WHEN AM I THE MOST VULNERABLE? 5
5.2 WHO ARE THESE HIJACKERS ? 6
5.3 ARE THERE DIFFERENT TYPES OF HIJACKING ? 6
5.4 WHAT PREVENTATIVE MEASURES CAN I TAKE REGARDING MY PROPERTY ? 7
5.5 HOW SHOULD I RESPOND IN THE EVENT OF BEING HIJACKED ? 7
1. Introduction
This document was designed with the following in mind:
• To educate the public
• To assist the public in recognising what a suspicious vehicle and
person may look like
• To emphasise the seriousness of hijackings on the person reading this
awareness guide.
Hijacking is not a new or unique problem to South Africa.
The first hijacking was recorded in 1984.
Between January and August 1996, there were 8 740 hijackings in South
Africa, of which 5 251 were in Gauteng.
Hijacking is also not only a problem just associated with industrial
areas; e.g. Wadeville in Germiston, but rather a problem associated with
the availability of a certain vehicle.
In 90% of these cases the hijackers were armed, although only 1% of
attacks involved a fatal shooting. This means that the better prepared a
potential victim is, the greater probability of the person surviving the
attack with limited physical injury.

2. How to Avoid a Hijack Situation
2.1 Take Precautions:
• Be familiar with your environment.
• Get to know who belongs in the vicinity of your home or workplace, and
who does not.
• Keep your eyes open for anything out of the ordinary.
• Lock all doors and close windows before driving off.
• Try to vary your route to work, the gym – all places you travel to
regularly.
• Hijackers are professionals too; they plan their attacks carefully.
• Ensure all your mirrors are adjusted to give you an optimal all-round
view of your surroundings.
• Try to stop about 5m behind the car in front of you at a stop sign or
traffic light – it makes for an easy getaway if trouble arises.

2.2 Don’t Be Fooled By:
• False appeals for help.
• “Accidents” such as having you car rammed from behind.
• Someone trying to get help from a stationary car.
• your electric gates being jammed

2.3 Know Your Environment:
• If approached by a stranger while in your car, drive off if possible
and/or use your hooter to attract attention.
• Be constantly on the lookout for suspicious looking characters or
vehicles and do not hesitate to report!them to the Police.
• Always be on the guard for potential danger, and be on the lookout for
possible escape routes and safe refuge along the way.
• If your suspicions are aroused by any person or vehicle in a high-risk
area, treat it as hostile and take appropriate action (i.e. Ignore a red
robot if it is safe to drive through; turn off and speed away from the
perceived danger zone) and call for assistance where necessary.
• Always have your identity document and driver’s license on your person;
and a pen and notepad ready to make necessary notes.
• If possible, avoid driving in the dark. Hijackers may stage a minor
accident; e.g. If your car is bumped from behind and you do not feel
comfortable with the individual/s involved in the situation, drive to the
nearest Police Station for help.
• Never open your vehicle window or door for any stranger. If a
suspicious person is near your unoccupied car, do not approach the
vehicle. Keep walking to the nearest public area and ask for assistance.

3. How to reduce the risk
While there is no guarantee what action will prevent hijacking,
practising the following common sense techniques can reduce the risk:
3.1 When Entering Your Vehicle and While Driving:
• Have your key ready, but not visible.
• Inspect the outside and inside of the vehicle before unlocking.
• Know your destination and directions to it, and be careful should you
get lost.
• Always drive with your windows and doors locked and/or closed.
• Make a mental note of any Police Stations in the vicinity while
driving.
• When dropping a passenger off, make sure that they are safely in their
own vehicles before departing.
• Avoid driving through high crime or unfamiliar areas.
• Avoid driving late at night at/or the early hours of the morning when
the roads are quiet.
• Drive in the centre lane away from pedestrians where possible.
• If possible, never drive alone.
• NEVER, EVER pick up hitchhikers.
• Never follow routine routes when driving; change on a regular basis.
• Do not leave windows open more than 5 cm.
3.2 When Parking Your Vehicle:
• Check rear-view mirror to ensure that you are not being followed.
• When returning home after dark, ensure that there is an outside light
on, or have someone meet you at the door.
• When exiting your vehicle, be cautious and aware of surrounding
obstructions and shrubbery that may be concealing a hijacker.
• Never sit in your parked car without being conscious of your
surroundings. Sleeping in a stationery vehicle is particularly dangerous.

• When approaching your driveway, be on the lookout for suspicious
vehicles/persons.

4. What is a suspicious vehicle/person?
A suspicious vehicle/person is a vehicle/person that acts in a manner
which may seem to be unusual or strange.
EXAMPLES:
4.1 Vehicles
You are driving from your home; a new vehicle follows you for thirty
minutes staying in the same lane as you, taking the same turn-offs as
you.
If this vehicle has an old registration number e.g. HSG 090 T, the
registration number is false, as all new cars should now have new Gauteng
numbers plates.
The most important fact to remember while driving a motor vehicle is to
be closed at all times. This is why the K53 driving method of driving is
beneficial since the method concentrates a lot on the regular use of rear
view mirrors.
4.2 Persons
A suspicious person can be any person that you feel acts in a strange
manner. The problem with suspicious persons is that there are no
distinguishing features. Hijackers come in any form or shape. Colour,
race, sex or age are not distinguishing features.
The best way to identify a suspicious person is to see all unknown
persons as being suspicious.

5. Questions and Answers
5.1 WHEN AM I THE MOST VULNERABLE?
At traffic lights 7%
At a stop street or yield sign 6%
At other intersections 1%
In front of private residences 51%
At business premises 5%
At shops, post offices, telephone booths, etc 3%
At filling stations 1%
Victims sitting in parked cars 10%
Victims forced off road by decoys 4%
Victims parking, i.e. Either starting cars or
leaving/approaching parked cars 2%
Victims stationery and working at the roadside, i.e.
repairing telephone cables 2%
While loading and offloading goods 2%
By hitch-hikers 1%
While taxis are loading/offloading passengers 4%
Unknown 1%

5.2 WHO ARE THESE HIJACKERS ?
To date, the overwhelming proportion of all the hijackers have been men,
and occasionally women. operating in groups of four or five, sometimes
more. The hijackers tend to be very young, in their teens and early
twenties, although some victims report!the presence of a ‘team leader’
who seemed older. Women are being used to lull potential victims into a
false sense of security, since most of us feel less threatened in the
presence of a woman as opposed to a man.
These people are sometimes well dressed, but not always. They may wear a
jacket or jersey under which they may conceal weapons, mostly handguns
and knives, but occasionally AK47 assault rifles.
The hijackers operate from motorcars, although they have been known to
attack on foot. The cars they use vary, but are normally high performance
vehicles, sometimes with tinted windows. Their driving habits are
immediately suspicious. Before an attack they may cruise slowly around a
particular area (often for days before the attack) without any apparent
sense of purpose or specific direction. They may also simply sit in the
car parked off the road or in a parking garage. Immediately after an
attack, their driving patterns change dramatically. They will speed off,
driving perhaps nervously and recklessly, but often with an air of
bravado as if enjoying or flaunting publicly their total disregard for
the law and the innocent person they have just attacked. They might
ignore red traffic lights, jump stop streets and weave in and out through
traffic, especially on motorways. This renders them highly visible to the
public and this is where private citizens can play a vital role in
assisting these people’s arrest.
The police are urging citizens to make use of the 10111 telephone number
if they find themselves in a hijack situation. It is also open to anyone
who sees a suspicious looking vehicle either following them or loitering
around the neighbourhood.

5.3 ARE THERE DIFFERENT TYPES OF HIJACKING ?
• The “Freight” hijacking, in which a commercial vehicle is hijacked, is
not only to secure the vehicle, but also its cargo, which can be of
substantial value. Frequently, the cargo is of more interest to the
hijacker than the truck.
• The “Transport” hijacking, in which the vehicle is taken for the
express purpose of using as transport!during other crimes such as drug
trafficking, burglaries, bank robberies and gun running. The vehicles are
probably later cannibalised for spare parts or simply dumped.
• The “Showmanship” hijacking, in which a gang operates out of
egotistical bravado, acting on the “this is a cool thing to be doing”
rationale. Peer group pressure is very high and individuals may be
coerced into more dangerous and daredevil approaches, being labelled as a
‘sissy’ if they do not. Thus intimidation, violence and vandalism is
associated with the crime.
• The “Operational” hijacking, in which a group formally work together in
a more structured way. They usually have experience in car theft and have
established contact within the motorcar underworld who will receive and
pay cash for stolen vehicles or spare parts. They also often have
information with regards to the international black market, e.g. The
movement of stolen cars into South Africa’s neighbouring states.
• The “Syndicate” hijacking, which is the most organised of all and often
has international connections. A network of hijacking groups is
established with the overall co-ordinator syndicating out work so that he
remains out of view in exactly the same way as the “drug barons” use
pushers. This makes identifying and arresting the ultimate boss very
difficult.
Additionally, a syndicate is often backed by a lot of money, especially
if there are international links and makes full use of any potential to
bribe the authorities in order to protect their operations.

5.4 WHAT PREVENTATIVE MEASURES CAN I TAKE REGARDING MY PROPERTY?
• Ensure that anyone leaving your property can get into their car, start
it, lock the doors and be fully prepared to drive off before the gates
are opened. Consciously think about this every time someone leaves your
premises.
• If possible, ensure that anyone leaving you premises can do so without
having to reverse into the road. Reversing forces one to concentrate on
the driving and not what lies outside the gate. It also greatly reduces
visibility.
• If your visitors have to park in the street, escort them out on foot
and check that the road is clear for them. If you have dogs, take them
with you, especially after dark.
• Ensure that your gate and driveway are well lit after dark. Replace
fused light bulbs immediately.
• Ensure that the number of your house is clearly visible at all times,
night or day.
• Install electrically operated gates – consider these now a necessity
rather than a luxury.
• If you have electric gates and a buzzer system, ensure that visitors
can reach the buzzer without having to get out of their cars.
• At the home, when someone rings the bell and you have established that
the person can enter your property, do not leave them stationary waiting
outside for longer than is absolutely necessary.
• Either do not leave you property or hesitate to drive away from it if
you spot a suspicious looking person or car in your immediate vicinity
• Be particularly carefully if you live in a cul de sac, given their
single point of entry and exit. More and more residents are reverting to
closing off cul de sacs and employing a guard at the entrance. However,
when considering this, do not forget to liaise with the City Council.
• When driving, avoid wearing flashy jewellery, heavy gold chains, large
dangling earrings, gold watches, or anything that can be easily seen from
a distance by a casual passer-by.
• Never leave any important documents in your car, i.e. cheque books,
bank statements, invoices, telephone accounts, credit cards, keys, remote
controls or personal post, anything that may provide personal details,
either while stationary or driving.
• Vehicle tracking: the only solution to vehicle related crimes is to
have tracking systems installed.

5.5 HOW SHOULD I RESPOND IN THE EVENT OF BEING HIJACKED?
• No matter how outraged you may feel at the time, your prime objective
must be to look after your personal safety and that of your passengers.
The preservation of human life must take precedence over material assets.

• Do nothing that is going to alarm the hijackers. Never initiate any
movement yourself. This may give the hijacker the impression that you are
reaching for a gun or panic button. Remember – the hijackers will be as
nervous, if not more so, than you. Do not motion with your hands. Rather
tell the hijackers where they can find the items. Keep you hands clearly
visible and as still as possible, ideally at chest level. Do not raise
them above your head as the hijackers may interpret this as you trying to
attract the attention of a third party.
• Answer any Questions truthfully especially with regard to firearms. If
the hijacker finds out or suspects that you have lied to him, he is more
likely to turn violent and unleash his frustrations on you physically.
• Even in your shocked and terrified state, try to listen to and
understand exactly what they hijackers want from you.
• Try to concentrate on the possibility of identifying your attackers at
a later stage. But remember – this does not mean staring at your
attackers, making it obvious that you are looking for a means of
identifying them. Stare openly at them and they will be less willing to
release you, as they will think that you have incriminating evidence
against them.
• If they kidnap you – co-operate with them fully. If you have a baby
sleeping in the back seat which they may not have noticed, tell the
attackers. Tell them that driving away with your child is only going to
make things more difficult for them. Ask them if they can fetch your
child. Do not move towards the car without their explicit directive. Tell
them that a baby means them no harm and is no threat. Do the same if you
have a pet in the car. Do not push the issue to the point where your life
may be threatened at the expense of a pet.

From: WWW.AfricanCrisis.Org
[These words below could be describing South Africa today... or
Zimbabwe... or much of the world... Fake democracy is the new tyranny.
Jan]

Ponder these words of Alexis de Tocqueville (written in 1838):

The form of tyranny sometimes described as "democratic despotism" (it
would have been unthinkable in the Middle Ages) was championed by the
Economists [the socialists of the 18th century] well before the
Revolution.  They were for abolishing all hierarchies, all class
distinctions, all differences of ranks, and the nation was to be composed
of individuals almost exactly alike and unconditionally equal.  In this
undiscriminated mass was to reside, theoretically, the sovereign power
[i.e., the people]; yet it was to be carefully deprived of any means of
controlling or even supervising the activities of its own government.
For above it was a single authority, its mandatory, which was entitled to
do anything and everything without consulting it.  This authority could
not be controlled by public opinion since public opinion had no means of
making itself heard; the State was a law unto itself and nothing short of
revolution could break its tyranny.  De jure it was a subordinate agent;
de facto a master.

From: WWW.AfricanCrisis.Org
[An American friend sent this to me. From all I can see, it is factual.
The comments about Mozambique and Rhodesia being on the money. Apparently
Kerry's wife studied at Wits University in Johannesburg and she was known
even then for her leftist views. Jan]

The Mysterious Kerry Couple

"A Polish friend well-schooled in the arcana of communism tells me
that Teresa Heinz Kerry's father was the founder of the Mozambique
Communist Party"
Source: http://www.orli.us/blog/?cat=1

"She hasn't been back to Mozambique since April of 1974, when she was
thirty-five, and married to John Heinz....The family was scheduled
to return to the United States on April 25th, but the borders were closed
and the airport shut down. That day, Salazar's heir, Marcelo Caetano, had
been ousted in a bloodless military coup. Its leaders were a cadre of
young Army officers, many of whom had fought in their country's African
wars and returned home—like some of their American contemporaries in
Vietnam—radicalized... When the news from Lisbon reached Lourenço
Marques, the capital of Mozambique, stunned and ecstatic people took to
the streets. Teresa Heinz and her father attended the first open meeting
of frelimo (Frente da Libertação de Moçambique), which had been waging a
guerrilla war of liberation for more than ten years, and
they joined the vast throng of celebrants marching through
the "cement town." (The expression, which refers to the European enclaves
in Mozambique's urban centers, alludes to their solidity rather than to
their ugliness. Most Africans lived in wretched shanties on the
outskirts, which were known as "cane towns.") The parade took her up and
down familiar, still well-kept avenues lined with
jacaranda trees dripping pale blossoms, past the Museum of Natural
History, next door to which her grandmother had lived, and past the
colonial villa on the cliffs overlooking the Indian Ocean where she and
her siblings grew up."
Source: http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/?040927fa_fact

("The FRELIMO rebel movement was sponsored by the communists and
fought the Portuguese. Mozambique fell to the communists virtually
overnight in 1975 because of the coup in Portugal. The newly installed
FRELIMO government nationalized all the country's industries overnight.
This caused an almost instant collapse of the economy as the Portuguese
colonists fled. FRELIMO then gave succor to Robert Mugabe's ZANLA army.
This proved to be decisive in causing the collapse of Rhodesia, which was
renamed Zimbabwe.")

"Mozambique gained its independence from Portugal in 1975. A Marxist-
Leninist group, the Front for the Liberation of Mozambique (Frelimo)
assumed power..."
Source:
http://encarta.msn.com/encnet/refpages/RefArtTextOnly.aspx?
refid=761572241&print\
=0

Follow The Money: (excerpted from opensecrets.org)
TEXAS PACIFIC GROUP
3/31/2003
$20,000
Democratic Senatorial Campaign Cmte
Texas Pacific Group/Principal Inves
7/14/2004
$15,000
DNC Services Corp
TEXAS PACIFIC GROUP
7/23/2004
$5,000
Democratic Senatorial Campaign Cmte
TEXAS PACIFIC GROUP
4/11/2003
$2,000
Daschle, Tom
TEXAS PACIFIC GROUP
5/20/2004
$2,000
Knowles, Tony(Democratic candidate from Alaska for U.S. Senate,
2004.)
TEXAS PACIFIC GROUP
8/2/2004
$2,000
Murray, Patty (Democratic incumbent from Washington state for U.S.
Senate, 2004.-let us never forget: "Democrat senator praises bin Laden
Patty
Murray asks
students to ponder why U.S. lacks popularity of terrorist
December 20, 2002 By Art Moore SEATTLE – Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wash.,
told a
group of high-school students in her state that the U.S. should
adopt Osama bin
Laden's nation-building tactics. "We've got to ask, why is this man
so popular
around the world?" said Murray, according to the Vancouver Columbian
newspaper.
"Why are people so supportive of him in many countries that are
riddled with
poverty?")

TEXAS PACIFIC GROUP/INVESTOR
3/9/2004
$2,000
Edwards, Chet(Democratic incumbent from Texas for the 17th
Congressional
District, 2004.)
Texas Pacific Group
7/14/2004
$2,000
Kerry, John

Source:
http://www.opensecrets.org/indivs/search.asp?
txtName=Bonderman&NumOfThou=0&txt20\
04=Y&submit=Go%21
Money Trail Behind the Censorship of Stolen Honor
We are just starting to trace it now.
If you do not think having the Heinz money means anything, ask
yourself how much Ketchup is used by Burger King.
"Fixing the Whopper Following five years of steadily declining sales
of Burger King's icon Whopper sandwich, the chain called back co-
founder Dave Edgerton to help fix it with Peter Gibbons, the
company's corporate chef. Although the new Whopper will look almost
identical to the current one, the only thing that will stay the same
is the Heinz ketchup."
Source: http://www.usatoday.com/money/industries/food/2004-03-21-
burgerking_x.htm
When Kerry Teresa and the Edwards couple are not busy telling
whoppers
it seems at least some of them are busy covering them with ketchup.
Take cognizance of Burger King:
"Burger King Bars Ads from TV Show Discussing Kerry October 20th,2004
NEW YORK (Reuters) - Hamburger chain Burger King said on Wednesday
that it would not run its commercials during a controversial program
about U.S.
presidential candidate John Kerry (news - web sites) to be aired by
Sinclair
Broadcast Group." Boycott Burger King
Contact the Burger King Corporate Office:
5505 Blue Lagoon Drive, Miami FL 33126
Corporate Headquarters (305) 378-3000
Fax: 305-378-7262
http://www.burgerking.com
Marketing/Advertising (305) 378-7200
Donations/Charitable Contributions (305) 378-7096
Consumer Relations (305) 378-3535
(Monday-Friday 9 a.m.-5 p.m. ET)
Tell Burger King that you WILL NEVER PATRONIZE THEM AGAIN.
"This king commands a whopper of a fast food empire. Burger King
operates the #2 hamburger chain (behind McDonald's) with more than
11,200 restaurants across the US and in about 55 other countries. In
addition to its popular Whopper sandwich, the chain offers a variety
of burgers, chicken sandwiches, salads, and breakfast items. Most of
Burger King's free-standing units offer drive-through service as
well as dine-in seating; about 90% of its restaurants are operated
by franchisees. Founded by James McLamore and David Edgerton in
1954, Burger King was owned by UK-based Diageo until 2002 when an
investment group led by Texas Pacific Group bought the company for
about $1.5 billion and took it private."

Tell Texas Pacific Group 301 Commerce St., Ste. 3300 Fort Worth, TX
76102 Phone: 817-871-4000 Fax: 817-871-4001 that you have contacted
Attorney General John Ashcroft and urged him to investigate the
Burger King
assault on free speech when it pulled its advertising from Stolen
Honor.

"Founded in 1993, the Fort Worth, Texas-based private equity firm
TPG is famous for investing in bankrupt America West and Continental
Airlines during the 1990s and actually making money. TPG has also
invested in Oxford Health Plans and ON Semiconductor. More recently,
TPG led a consortium of investors to buy Burger King for $1.5
billion from Diageo Plc.
But a possible investment from TPG in Air Canada comes at a
precarious time for airlines. Traffic has slumped amid high oil
prices, fear of travel due to terrorism and the war in Iraq. "The
industry is in its most brutal downturn ever," said analyst David
Strine of Bear Stearns."

Hmmmm, now let me see how this works. The arabs raise oil prices,
including
the prices for jet fuel, to the hilt, the airlines go belly up
because they
cannot pass along the fuel price hikes to their passengers who won't
pay it,
and then the airlines get bought up by companies that
just "coincidentally"
do things like block Sinclair from broadcasting an anti-Kerry film
titled
"Stolen Honor", that would have exposed Kerry for what he is.
"H.J. Heinz Company (ticker: HNZ, exchange: New York Stock Exchange)
News Release - 20-Nov-2002

Heinz/Del Monte Transaction Proceeding On Schedule; Del Monte
Stockholders Meeting Scheduled for December 19

PITTSBURGH--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Nov. 20, 2002--H. J. Heinz Company
(NYSE:HNZ) is pleased to confirm that the previously announced
transaction (by which Heinz is spinning off its U.S. and Canadian
pet food, U.S. tuna and retail private label soup, and U.S. infant
feeding businesses to its shareholders and then merging these
businesses with Del Monte Corporation, a subsidiary of Del Monte
Foods Company, NYSE: DLM) is proceeding on schedule toward a closing
late this calendar year or early next year, contingent upon a ruling
from the Internal Revenue Service that the spin-off is tax-free to
shareholders. The companies have made substantial progress towards
completing the transaction, including:

Del Monte has called a stockholders meeting for Thursday, December
19, 2002, during which Del Monte stockholders will vote on certain
matters relating to the transaction. Notice of the meeting and the
proxy statement/prospectus relating to the transaction are being
mailed to Del Monte stockholders. As previously announced, the
investment firm Texas Pacific Group, which beneficially owns
approximately 47% of Del Monte's outstanding common stock, has
entered into an agreement to vote its shares in favor of the
transaction.

Heinz has announced that the businesses to be spun off and merged
with Del Monte are now fully functioning freestanding entities that
are ready to be integrated into Del Monte's structure. These
businesses have been separated from Heinz on schedule, from both an
operational and systems standpoint, including invoicing,
collections, information technology, manufacturing and distribution.
Employees associated with the separated businesses have been
relocated to buildings being transferred to Del Monte.

Heinz and Del Monte are proceeding with the bank financing
activities for the transaction, with managing agent, retail and
institutional investor meetings being held this week in San
Francisco and New York.

Additionally, the waiting period under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act has
lapsed, clearing the way for the transaction to proceed from an anti-
trust perspective.

As previously announced, the Heinz/Del Monte transaction will give
Heinz shareholders a stake in the new Del Monte. In addition to
retaining their current Heinz shares, Heinz shareholders will
receive

based on the exchange ratio and assuming the companies' current,
fully diluted capitalization -- approximately 0.44 - 0.45 shares of
new Del Monte common stock for every one share of Heinz common stock
they hold.

As part of the transaction, new financing for the spun-off
businesses will be obtained, approximately $1.1 billion of which
will be distributed to Heinz. Heinz plans to use these proceeds to
reduce outstanding debt."
Source:http://www.corporate-ir.net/ireye/ir_site.zhtml?
ticker=HNZ&script=410&layout=9&item_id=358218
Fact Fiction or more than a bit of either or both

We really do not know what to make of recent rumors about Teresa
Heinz Kerry, though that is not all this post touches on it is a
good bit of it.

First the rumors, whether they are fact or fiction we cannot say.
Perhaps you, dear reader, can investigate them yourself. Before you
do and
before you read further you should know that we are not connected to
any
campaign or candidate or organization or group though we do hope
that Kerry
loses and Bush wins.

On December 28th, 1997 The Pittsburgh Tribune-Review
ran a page one story claiming that Teresa Heinz was a lesbian, which
may bring some sense of perspective to the Kerry-Edwards campaign
all-out pre-
emptive
attack on Vice President Cheney's daughter, who was called a lesbian
by
Kerry himself, in his final 2004 Presidential debate with President
Bush.
Kerry may also have felt that Republicans might seek to use his vote
against
DOMA, the Defense of Marriage Act, to portray him as anti-marriage,
perhaps
even as anti-heterosexual. Hence another possible reason for
the Kerry-Edwards campaign attack on Vice President Cheney's
daughter.
Kerry Has No Sense of Decency or of Shame No Sense At All
Kerry Worse Than Howard Stern And Howard Dean Combined
Joseph Welch
Joseph Nye Welch (left), chief counsel for the U. S. Army, speaks to
Senator McCarthy during the Army-McCarthy hearings in Washington, D.
C., June, 1954.
http://www.apl.org/HISTORY/MCCARTHY/welch.html

"Welch removed his glasses, stared dolefully at the table and shook
his head. What he said then became the event's dramatic climax, and
a moment more movie-like in its dramatic impact than even most
movies come close to.

"Until this moment, Senator, I think I never really gauged your
cruelty or your recklessness." There was no noise in the huge, high-
ceilinged room save for the sparse clearing of throats. "Let us not
assassinate this lad further, Senator. You have done enough. Have
you no sense of decency sir, at long last? Have you no sense of
decency?"

"Mary Beth Cahill, John Kerry's campaign manager, called Mary
Cheney's sexuality "fair game" in a post-debate interview with Fox
News Wednesday night
(October 13th, 2004)."

"KERRY: I think if you were to talk to Dick Cheney's daughter, who
is a lesbian..." (October 13th, 2004). Bush-Kerry Presidential Debate

"EDWARDS:
..the vice president and his wife...have a gay daughter."
(October 5th, 2004) Cheney-Edwards Vice Presidential Debate


"The vice president's wife, Lynne Cheney, called Kerry "not a good
man" and his remarks about daughter Mary Cheney "a cheap and tawdry
political trick." Meanwhile, Elizabeth Edwards, the wife of vice
presidential candidate John Edwards, suggested in a radio interview
that Mrs. Cheney might feel "a certain degree of shame" because her
daughter is a lesbian."
Source:
http://www.dfw.com/mld/dfw/news/special_packages/election2004/9918392
htm?1c

The biggest of the big rumors going around about Teresa Heinz
Kerry,is that
Teresa, before she married the late Senator John Heinz, who was
killed in a
helicopter crash, and later went on to marry Senator John Kerry, who
she had met
while Senator Heinz was still alive and still married to her, was a
Soviet KGB
Agent, using her body and her wiles, which some rumors state include
heterosexual, lesbian, sado-masochist "Dominatrix" and other types
of kinky and
straight sex, etc. to blackmail United Nations diplomats and turn
them into
unwilling spies for the Soviet KGB.

While the Soviet KGB did indeed use many people to do just that we
have
no evidence that Teresa Heinz Kerry was ever one of those people.
The historic widespread use of "Honey Traps" by the Soviet KGB is a
fact
however. Many targets of such "Honey Traps" were indeed United
Nations diplomats
and staffers.
"The KGB was, for 50 years, the most effective intelligence agency
the world had
ever seen. The key to its success was a ruthless skill for using
money, sex and
blackmail as tools to entice foreigners to betray their countries
and hand over
secret information. In this two hour program, that could only be
produced with
the end of the Cold War, we enter the never-before seen and
carefully guarded
vaults of the worlds most feared organization, the KGB. In this
program we
reveal the inner working of the KGB. The use of the "Honey Trap"
which is, in
intelligence circles, the use of women in sexual situations to snare
victims and
obtain secret information. How did the KGB identify U.S. Marines who
worked at
the U.S. Embassy and target them, leading to compromise and in the
case of
marine Lonetree, to a 30 year prison sentence. We see secret footage
of the
bumbling FBI agent selling out his country for sex in a car, and the
CIA officer
who lived a lavish lifestyle at the cost of agents lives. See the
amazing use of
hidden cameras and the footage that reveals seduction, passion and
sexual
conduct all used to destabilize enemy governments. We still have
only a glimpse
of the secret KGB files and we may never know the full extent of the
information
contained in the KGB vaults but in the KGB Sex Files you get the
closet look
ever at the Russian State secrets. Hosted by Roger Moore."
Source: http://us.imdb.com/title/tt0276480/plotsummary
"Inside the Beltway
By John McCaslin
Published June 21, 2004
Sexpionage
The International Spy Museum in Washington, the only museum in the
country
dedicated to espionage, will enforce a minimum age of 18 for its
July 14 seminar
on one of the oldest tricks of the trade: sexpionage.
Those of a mature age will learn that spies, counterspies and even
terrorists conduct undercover activities "under the covers," using
seduction as
a tool to attract and manipulate, coerce and compromise.
Authentic KGB sexual-entrapment videos and newly released technical
details
of the infamous Russian "honey traps" will be shown."
Source:
http://www.washingtontimes.com/functions/print.php?StoryID=20040620-
113752-4628r

Getting back to those rumors, perhaps the parts about those rumors
that concern sado-masochist "Dominatrix" type sex could explain some
of
Senator Kerry's bizarre statements. If the use of oxygen
deprivation, via
plastic bags placed over Senator Kerry's head by Teresa, or dunking
Senator
Kerry's head in buckets filled with water, urine, or other
substances, were
involved Senator Kerry's brain, deprived of vital oxygen might well
slip into
the type of bizarre statements he has been making recently.

Asphyxiation,smothering, face sitting, bondage,drowning,dunking,are
not uncommon
torture practices in bizarre kinky sado-masochistic "Dominatrix"
type sex.
"Autoerotic asphyxiation
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Autoerotic asphyxiation is the practice of self-strangulation,
typically by the
use of a ligature, while masturbating. The decrease of blood to the
brain is
said to heighten the sexual pleasure. It is a highly dangerous
practice that
results in many deaths each year.

It is a popular subject in tabloids and celebrity gossip magazines,
particularly
when a celebrity dies as a result of suicide or other mysterious
circumstances.
Such was reputedly the case with the deaths of Jerzy Kosinski (in
1991) and
Michael Hutchence (in 1997), though no evidence to support the claim
was
produced in either case.

The death in 1994 of Stephen Milligan, the British Conservative MP
for
Eastleigh, was a case of auto-erotic asphyxiation combined with self-
bondage.
This combination is particularly lethal.

An accidental death due to autoerotic asphyxiation is an important
plot element
in the film The Ruling Class (1972), starring Peter O'Toole. It is
also
important in Rising Sun, a movie starring Sean Connery and Wesley
Snipes, based
on the novel of the same name by Michael Crichton. It is also
depicted in the
movie Ken Park.

The book Acquisition of Power by Erika Barr (ISBN 1591293073)
touches upon this
subject.

Recent court cases have come to varied results as to whether the
unintentional
death resulting from autoerotic asphyxiation falls under the "self-
induced
injury" clause of standard life insurance policies, which prevents
payouts for
suicide. In June of 2003, one US court said the intent was not death
and
therefore the case was an accident [1]
(http://home.aigonline.com/content/0,1109,15975-1567-legal--
legal,00.html),
while another in August 2003 said it does technically fall within
the terms
since death is the logical result of asphyxiation [2]
(http://home.aigonline.com/content/0,1109,16158-1572-legal,00.html).
External links
http://www.silentvictims.org/
BBC News story about the death of Stephen Milligan
(http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/february/8/newsid_2
538000/2538\
165.stm)
Information on the practice of autoerotic asphyxia
(http://216.239.41.104/search?
q=cache:hcGyRuuPeagJ:www.cwu.edu/~jenkinsa/Autoero\
tic_Asphyxia_Page.html+%22autoerotic+asphyxiation%
22+dictionary+OR+glossary+OR+w\
ords+OR+terms+OR+lexicon&hl=en&lr=lang_en&ie=UTF-8)
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autoerotic_asphyxiation"

Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autoerotic_asphyxia
"Have you heard THE ULTIMATE JOHN KERRY AD? Click the link below and
it
will play"
http://johnkerryads.websiteanimal.com/
Source: http://www.marksimone.com/

"Former Democratic vice presidential candidate Joe Lieberman called
President Bush a "strong and consistent supporter of Israel,"
Source:By George Bennett
Palm Beach Post Staff Writer Thursday, October 14, 2004
..Lieberman said in an interview that Kerry needs to be
more "explicit" about his support for Israel to remove doubts of
some Jewish voters.

Lieberman,(is) a popular figure in South Florida four years ago when
he campaigned as the first Jewish candidate on a major party
presidential ticket...After speaking to about 600 people at the
Huntington Lakes community west of Delray Beach, Lieberman told
reporters that Bush appears to have made inroads with Jewish voters,
who voted Democratic by an estimated 4-to-1 margin in 2000. "We are
dealing with a president who's had a record of strong, consistent
support for Israel. You can't say otherwise. And I think John Kerry
to reassure people has to himself be explicit" rather than having
surrogates deliver the message, Lieberman said. He said he has urged
the Kerry campaign to have the candidate speak more about Israel
because "only John Kerry can eliminate those doubts." In his remarks
to the audience at Huntington Lakes, Lieberman called Bush "strong
and consistent" on Israel and said it would be "unjustified" to
criticize him on that issue...."
Source:
http://www.palmbeachpost.com/news/content/news/epaper/2004/10/14/a12a
_lieberman_1014.html

With all due respect to Senator Joe Lieberman
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/GoJoeGo/
For more information: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/GoJoeGo/
Post message: GoJoeGo@yahoogroups.com
Subscribe: GoJoeGo-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
While we like and admire Senator Joe Lieberman,who we felt would
have been the Democrat with the strongest chance of defeating
President Bush,John Forbes Kohn-Kerry, a.k.a. John Failed The
American Test Kerry has no credibility on
ANY issue, because as John Flip-Flop Kerry he changes his positions
on issues not only from day to day but from sentence to sentence in
the same paragraph. We feel that John Forbes Kohn-Kerry is what is
known as a "Self-Hating-Jew", someone who despises his own partial
Jewish heritage. We feel that Senator Kerry is in a state of deep
psychological denial about his own partial Jewish heritage. We feel
that state of deep psychological denial about his own partial Jewish
heritage makes Senator Kerry a danger to Israel and to the Jewish
people because he not only may, but already has, gone out of his way
to act in a way which shows that deep psychological denial about his
own partial Jewish heritage. Kerry's grandfather, Fritz Kohn was
Jewish, and converted to Roman Catholicism making up the name Kerry.

"Kerry's paternal grandfather, Frederick A. Kerry (born Fritz Kohn),
was born in the town of Horni Benesov, Austria-Hungary (in what is
now the Moravian-Silesian Region of the Czech Republic), and grew up
in Mödling (a small town near Vienna, Austria). His wife Ida (née
Loewe) was born in Budapest, Hungary. They were both German-speaking
Jews. But in 1901, Fritz Kohn converted from Judaism to Catholicism
and changed his name to Frederick Kerry. His wife Ida also converted
at the same time. They then immigrated to the United States,
arriving at Ellis Island in 1905. They raised their three children,
including John's father, as Catholics. A Czech historian believes
that Ida was a descendant of Sinai Loew, one of three older brothers
of Rabbi Judah Loew (1525-August 22, 1609), a famous Kabbalist,
philosopher and talmudist known as the Maharal of Prague. Two of
Ida's siblings, Otto Loewe and Jenni Loewe, died in the Nazi
extermination camps (Theresienstadt and Treblinka, respectively),
after being deported from Vienna in 1942."
Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Kerry

One wonders whether Treblinka was on Kerry's mind in the first 2004
Presidential debate. "It was Kerry, strangely enough, who erred,
locating the cells of the KGB headquarters in Moscow as being 'under
Treblinka Square'. He must have meant under the Lubianka or under
Dzerzhinsky Square - Treblinka was a Nazi extermination camp."

Source:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uselections2004/comment/story/0,14259,13187
31,00.html

Here is the exact Kerry quote on Treblinka from the 09/30/2004
Presidential Debate in Coral Gables, Florida:

"KERRY: Well, let me just say quickly that I've had an extraordinary
experience of watching up close and personal that transition in
Russia, because I was there right after the transformation. And I
was probably one of the first senators, along with Senator Bob Smith
of New Hampshire, a former senator, go down into the KGB underneath
Treblinka Square and see reams of files with names in them. It sort
of brought home the transition to democracy that Russia was trying
to make."

Well, Senator Kerry if you do not know the difference between the
name of the place your Jewish relatives were murdered in by the
nazis, and the
name of the Square in Moscow where the KGB kept its headquarters, how
can you dare to think that you could avert another Holocaust or deal
with the current Russian regime, or do anything else competently as
President of the United States? How do you dare to run for President
of the United States? Especially considering your alleged links to
terrorists!
Read More in Kerry Linked To Terrorists
at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/americansecrets/message/1600
We all know that terrorists love anniversaries.
Dick Cheney knows that quite well, as he told Tim Russert on Meet
The Press on NBC TV on September 8th, 2002:
"MR. RUSSERT: Leading up this September 11, 2002, are we hearing an
increase in chatter? Are intelligence folks picking up conversations
amongst the al-Qaeda cells around the world?

VICE PRES. CHENEY: We've seen some of that. As you go through
anniversary dates during the course of the year, the anniversary
when U.S. troops first went into Saudi Arabia, the various
anniversaries crop up. Now, as I say, to date, not much has happened
in that respect, although we did see just this week the Germans
arrested two individuals planning, apparently, to set off a major
explosion at U.S. European Command in Heidelberg, Germany. Now, was
that al-Qaeda related? We don't know yet, but there is a temptation
I think for terrorists to try to stage events that hark back to
historically significant dates. And I wouldn't be at all surprised
if that's the case here. I'm not saying something is going to happen
on September 11, but as these major milestones come along, we often
receive reporting that it's tied into one of those dates."

It is good that Dick Cheney knew that. Cheney was in the White House
on 9/11/2001. Unfortunately John Failed The American Test Kerry did
not even
know the year, let alone the date, of the February 26th, 1993 attack
on
The World Trade Center in his debate with President Bush in St.
Louis, Missouri
in October of 2004. Here is that portion of the debate:
"Mr. Gibson The next question, Senator Kerry is for you. And it
comes from Ann Bronsing, who I believe is over in this area.

"Q. Senator Kerry, we have been fortunate that there have been no
further terrorist attacks on American soil since 9/11. Why do you
think this is? And if elected, what will you do to assure our safety?

Mr. Kerry Thank you very much, Ann. I've asked in my security
briefings why that is. And I can't go into all the answers, etc. But
let me say this to you. This president and his administration have
told you and all us it's not a question of when - excuse me, not a
question of if, it's a question of when. We've been told that. The
when I can't tell you. Between the World Trade Center bombing in
what was it, 1993 or so, and the next time was five years, seven
years. These people wait. They'll plan. They plot."

Yes they do plan and plot Senator, but you are the person who is
asking the
American people to replace President Bush with yourself and you did
not
even know what year The World Trade Center was first attacked in.

Why is that Senator? Don't you care enough about fighting terrorism
to
even find out what year The World Trade Center was first attacked in?

What is really bizarre about the two Kerry quotes above from the
recently
concluded series of Presidential Debates is that Kerry was vague
about
the year of the first attack on The World Trade Center, and about
the years in
which subsequent attacks occured, and that he failed to know the
difference
between the Nazi Concentration Camp called Treblinka, where his own
Jewish
relatives were murdered by the nazis, and the KGB square in Moscow
he misnamed
"Treblinka Square". Is Kerry suffering from oxygen deprivation to
his brain?
Another explanation might be Botox side effects.
http://politicalhumor.about.com/library/images/blpic-kerrybotox.htm
"Monday, Feb. 2, 2004 10:22 a.m. EST
Dean Hits Kerry on Botox Treatments

Hours after saying he intended to keep attacking the Democratic
front-runner as
his rivals had attacked him when he led the pack, former front-
runner Howard
Dean took a swipe at John Kerry for allegedly taking wrinkle-
removing Botox
injections.

During a conference call to Super Bowl parties of his supporters,
Dean spotted
an elderly looking long-haired singer on the pregame show, reports
the New York
Daily News.

"Is that Willie Nelson?" Dean asked. "It looks like he got Botox
injections,
too."

Dean quickly added that he hadn't identified the other Botox
recipient, but his
comment left little doubt as to the barb's intended direction.

Last week Kerry was forced to respond to the Botox rumors,
protesting a little
too much in comments to WRKO radio in Boston.

"I've never even heard it. Where did this come from? ... I've never
even heard
of it, never heard of it," the Democratic front-runner repeatedly
insisted."
Source: http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2004/2/2/110649.shtml
"Unfurrowed Kerry raises Botox query


By Jennifer Harper
THE WASHINGTON TIMES



Johnny, we hardly knew ye.
Just as the nation was warming to his craggy sincerity, the question
is
percolating: Did Sen. John Kerry trade in his Abe Lincolnhood for
some Hollywood
hocus-pocus, smoothing his signature facial furrows with a few
discreet pokes of
a Botox needle?
"He has absolutely, absolutely not had Botox treatments. You'd think
his
opponents would have something else to talk about besides John
Kerry's looks,"
his spokeswoman, Stephanie Cutter, said yesterday.
But those before-and-after photos of the Massachusetts Democrat,
transformed
from melancholy hound dog to svelte leading man, were displayed in
living color
at the Drudge Report (www.drudgereport.com) and elsewhere. ...
The photos certainly cast a wrinkle on things.
"I'm telling you, I always thought the mortician did a great job
with John
Kerry," Comedy Central's Colin Quinn joked yesterday. "But I didn't
know that
Botox could mix with embalming fluid. Frankly, I like just the
embalming fluid.
It gives a nicer look."
Mr. Quinn paused momentarily to envision the new and improved
presidential
hopeful.
"You know, John Kerry used to look like Keith Richard's square
brother who
went to business school. He used to look like Andrew Jackson on the
old $20
bill. But now, now he looks like Andrew Jackson on the new $20
bill," Mr Quinn
concluded. "Oh, the wonders of science."
The effects of Botox — an injectable drug made from botulism
bacteria that
can strategically relax facial muscles — last only three months.
Which means Mr.
Kerry, if he indeed received a discreet shot to a creased brow in
recent days,
would have to repeat his treatment around April.
But it's not as if Mr. Kerry had, say, gone the Michael Jackson
route. Botox
is relatively common: 1 million patients worldwide have had Botox
treatments in
the past 11 years, according to Allergan, its manufacturer.
"So what if he used Botox? It's his face, his life. If he feels he
needs it,
that's fine," said Dr. Rod Rohrick, a Dallas-based plastic surgeon
and president
of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons.
"Botox makes people look more at ease. It doesn't affect their
minds," Dr.
Rohrick continued. "Maybe there's still a stigma attached to plastic
surgery in
the Northeast driving this discussion, I don't know. But I do know
that baby
boomers don't want to age gracefully, they want to manage their age.
And if they
want to look more relaxed, that's perfectly OK."
But inquiring minds want to know: Can botulinum toxin type A add to
Mr.
Kerry's electability?
Perhaps.
In theory, a younger appearance could help wrest the youth vote from
Sen.
John Edwards of South Carolina, in all his mop-top wattage. A more
serene
bearing might help Mr. Kerry compete with the shrill vigor of Howard
Dean as
voters try to figure out whether the former Vermont governor is a
little
unstable or simply a spirited politician.
And of course, Mr. Kerry's new look could boost his approval ratings
among
women of a certain age, who may have gone to a Botox party or two
themselves.
It's all hooey as far as Mr. Kerry and his staff are concerned.
In a recent radio interview, the senator flatly denied using the
stuff, or
even knowing about its particulars, though his wife, ketchup heiress
Teresa
Heinz Kerry, has acknowledged that she's had a Botox tweak in past
years."
Source: http://www.washtimes.com/national/20040129-115042-5671r.htm
Can Botox make you forget things?
"Published Thursday October 21, 2004
Kerry's wife forgot Laura Bush's jobs, apologizes
THE LOS ANGELES TIMES
Teresa Heinz Kerry's unguarded speaking style created a campaign
sideshow
Wednesday with a comment questioning whether first lady Laura Bush
had held "a
real job." Heinz Kerry apologized later in the day, saying she "had
forgotten"
Bush's 10 years as a teacher and librarian. The wife of Democratic
presidential
nominee Sen. John Kerry made the offhand remark in an interview with
USA Today
published Wednesday. The Bush campaign criticized Heinz Kerry for
appearing to
draw a distinction between women who work in the home and those who
work outside
the home."
Source: http://www.omaha.com/index.php?u_np=0&u_pg=1673&u_sid=1236685
Medical Experts: John Kerry Received Botox Treatments
From an article dated January 29, 2004, by Alexandra Wolfe in the
New York
Observer:

"He's definitely gotten Botox," said Dr. Michael Kane, the Manhattan-
based
plastic surgeon and author of The Botox Book. Sen. Kerry, the doctor
explained,
"has certain facial motions, characteristic expressions that he
makes all the
time. Like when he frowns, he tends to push the center of his
eyebrows up. It's
a trademark of John Kerry's — and he just can't make that happen
now," said Dr.
Kane. "That's the look that's normally plastered on his face and it
never
happened once on his victory speech."
Indeed, Dr. Kane suggested that Sen. Kerry might seek a second
opinion. "What
he's got isn't Botox, it's bad Botox," the doctor said. "He has what
I call the
classic rookie mistake which is, in a man who has a lot of
horizontal lines on
his forehead, the botox is overdone in the person's forehead. It
changes normal
emotions, facial expressions; now his eyebrows are incredibly low
because
someone has over-injected them. His forehead is bizarrely smooth,
his eyebrows
now sit right on his eyes and if you look at the Drudge Report
pictures he now
has classic bunny lines." He explained that "bunny lines"
happen "when so many
muscles are over paralyzed" that the Botox recipient begins to rely
on "the
unusual muscles on the sides of his nose, making those little
scrunchy lines on
his nose — so he looks like a bunny."


Surveying the "Before" and "After" shots of Mr. Kerry that were
posted, along
with the WRKO soundbite, on Matt Drudge's website, New Jersey
plastic surgeon
Barry Citron let out a whoop and exclaimed, "That's definitely the
most
effective $600 he could spend on his campaign!" That would be the
cost of the
30-40 units of Botox that Dr. Citron guessed Mr. Kerry would have
needed to
smooth the expanse above his eyes.
"I'm willing to bet that between the beginning of Iowa and end of
New Hampshire
he had some Botox done," said Dr. Michael Sachs. The Manhattan-based
plastic
surgeon said he could tell because Mr. Kerry looked much less
haggard last
Tuesday night than he did in Iowa, and because, he added: "His
eyebrows didn't
move."

Dr. Sachs, explained that Botox, which is created from the botulinum
toxin type
A (there are seven different types), starts working its muscle-
relaxing magic in
three to five days, peaks at two weeks and lasts between three to
five months.

"Down the road, he may look even more relaxed and his eyebrows may
droop even
more," Dr. Sachs explained. Come convention time in July, however,
the candidate
will need a booster shot.

One plastic surgeon, Manhattan's Dr. Patricia Wexler, disagreed with
the pack.
"No, I don't believe he has," she said. "Much more is being made out
of this
than reality. It's the vertical lines" — she called them "scowl
lines" — "that
are considered negative, and I don't think he's had those done." Dr.
Wexler then
recommended that all politicans have their scowl lines removed. "It
would've
done Gore or Dole good to get rid of them," she said. Her diagnosis
of Sen.
Kerry: "He's more relaxed because he's been winning," she said.

Or was Mr. Kerry winning because he looked relaxed? Hamptons
cosmetic surgeon
Dr. Bruce Nadler opined that Mr. Kerry's new look was responsible
for his win in
New Hampshire. "The issues are 50 percent, but voters are also
looking for
someone who is likeable, who has a calming influence. He has a more
relaxed look
whereas you'd expect him to look more haggard, more tired as this
campaign
grinds away," said Dr. Nadler. "If Edwards is so much younger and
winning votes
as a result, and that's going to sway the crowd, Kerry thinks, `If
this other
guy has a youthful look, then youthful looks are going to help me. I
could win
over some of his supporters if I look a little more youthful as
well.' It's a
campaign strategy. Look at poor Joe Lieberman, he's not doing very
well, maybe
he looks a little too senior."

Whatever the case, Sen. Kerry's press secretary David Wade, sounded
flabbergasted by the accusations. "John Kerry has not had botox
treatments," Mr.
Wade wrote in an email. "And since when do plastic surgeons make
diagnoses from
Drudge Report photos? While it's amazing how two big victories in
Iowa and New
Hampshire can put a smile on your face, it's equally astounding how
desperation
leads our opponents to invent accusations. They can't run against
John Kerry on
health care, education, or national security, so they're attacking
his looks."

Of course, in New York, a town where plastic surgery ranks right up
there with
cable and psychotherapy on urbanites' necessity lists, what's really
driving the
did-he-or-didn't-he? debate is whether Sen. Kerry lied about
something as minor
as a question about his physical upkeep. As Dr. Kane observed: "If
it becomes an
issue it goes right to his credibility."

But New York-based political campaign consultant Hank Sheinkopf
explained why a
presidential candidate might not be eager to admit he's a
primper. "I don't
think this country is ready for the Botox president yet,." said Mr.
Sheinkopf,
who was a member of Bill Clinton's media team from `95 to `96 and
has helped
elect numerous New York politicians such as Bill Thompson and Betsy
Gotbaum. "I
can't imagine the president having facial peels every month or having
electrolysis. His problem is to be man enough to convince the Reagan
Democrats
in the Midwest, and Botox ain't gonna help!"
"posted 08-26-2003 07:38 AM

There's been a lot of publicity about possible side effects of Botox
lately,
though mostly when it's used for cosmetic reasons or if it's not
injected
correctly.
There's one that is so rare it's hardly mentioned & I had to call the
manufacturer to find out they do see it occassionally.

After my first injections, I got a slight rash on my eyelids. My
eyelids were
dry & itchy & red, but not too bad & I just covered it with make-up
& it went
away after a couple of months.

After my second injections, within a couple of days, my eyes swelled
almost shut
& the rash was so red it was purple. It looked (& felt) like I had a
sunburn on
my eyelids. They hurt so bad & were so dry, they felt like they
would crumble &
fall off! Have you ever left a contact out of solution for a day &
how it
shrivels & dries out -- that's what my eyelids felt like.

Everyone at the doctor's office looked at them & said the exact same
thing -- oh
my gosh, that looks so painful! I got so tired of hearing that!

My neuro went back & looked through records & it had happened to one
other
patient over a year ago at her office (another doctor had done the
injections),
so we called the manufacturer & it does happen occassionally. They
think it's
from the albumin that is in the solution that comes from a donor.

Hydrocortisone gel cleared it up within a couple of days & they gave
me
prednisone to have on hand, just in case my eyes swell all the way
closed.

Next time (yes, I'm still getting Botox again), I'll start using the
hydrocortisone gel the day I get the injections & the neuro will
inject as far
from my eyes as she can.

I just wanted everyone that gets Botox or is considering it to know
that is a
possible & very rare side effect."
Source: http://neuro-
mancer.mgh.harvard.edu/ubb/Forum40/HTML/007088.html
"KERRY ON ORANGE ALERT: SKIN TRANSITION ON EVE OF DEBATE

Just days before Dem presidential hopeful John Kerry is set to take
the stage in
a debate opener projected to be seen by 70 million, photos show the
senator
dramatically taking on color.

Is it the late September Wisconsin sun during debate prep that has
turned
Kerry's face to rich pumpkin-colored hues?

Or has he been campaigning in the rust-belt?

Kerry advisers defend the sudden deep tan transition, noting how it
simply was
from a game of flag football last Friday in Bedford, Mass.

But the College Democrats who met Kerry were surprised by his rich
tan glow --
before the game even began, the HARVARD CRIMSON reports."
Source: http://www.drudgereport.com/dnc55.htm

"Ms. Medavoy, whose husband Michael is the current chairman of
Phoenix Pictures
and former chairman of Tri-Star and Orion, alleges that she began
taking Botox
to treat her migraine headaches, but that Botox then somehow caused
these
headaches. She also claims that Botox caused fever, respiratory
problems and
hives."
(note: Respiratory problems sound potentially serious, if one cannot
get enough oxygen to one's brain. Imagine a President of the United
States,
whose finger is on the nuclear trigger that could bring about the
end of
all life on earth, whose brain is deprived of oxygen.)

"Complications of Botox
Date: Saturday, 25 October 2003
Time: 06:26 PM -0600


Comments
I have suffered from debilitating pain since having Botox for
migraines 13
months ago. After my seventh round (each given 3 months apart) my
neck, back and
shoulders went into spasm, and I have not had a pain-freee moment
since.
Finally, I have found a neurologist who believes that the reason
this happened
is that antibodies to the Botox formed in my body. These antibodies,
which
usually would only cause your body NOT to react to the Botox, caused
my body to
react in the opposite way intended. Rather than relaxing, the
muscles tightened
up. I don't know what the outcome of this will be, but I have a
place to start
now. For those of you who have similar suffering, now you may know
the reason.
Perhaps we can work together to find a way out of this horrible
predicament."
Source: http://www.botoxusers.com/_disc2/00000090.htm

Imagine a President of the United States, whose finger is on the
nuclear button
that could bring about the end of all life on earth who has:
"not had a pain-freee moment". Imagine such a President of the
United States
deciding to kill himself, and the rest of the earth with a push of
that
nuclear button.
Imagine if that President of the United States had a grandfather who
shot
himself to death. John Kerry's grandfather, Fredrick A. "Fritz"
Kerry was that grandfather.
"Fredrick A. Kerry, was actually a Czech Jew named Fritz Kohn who
had fled the
aggressive Austro-Hungarian Empire in 1905, brutalized by anti-
Semitism. Three
years before his arrival in America he married Ida Lowe, a beautiful
Jewish
musician from Budapest. According to the Boston Globe, the young
couple simply
studied a map of Europe, found County Kerry in Ireland, and chose it
as their
last name. Baptized as Catholics, they moved to Chicago with their
young son
Eric, where Fredrick (or Fred as he was called) earned a living as a
business
manager. Eventually they moved to Brookline, known as the "town of
millionaires"
in the early 1900s, had two additional children, Richard and
Mildred, and earned
a reputation as good neighbors. The local newspaper deemed
Fredrick "a prominent
man in the shoe business"; his shop was located at 487 Boylston
Street in the
Back Bay neighborhood of Boston. He seldom missed attending Catholic
church
services on Sunday. (He kept it secret that he was of Jewish
descent.) With a
two-story, Arts and Crafts-style house in Brookline — designed by
John C.
Spofford — located at 10 Downing Road, a black Cadillac parked in
front and
three healthy children running happily about, it seemed, to the
outside world,
that the Kerry family exemplified the American dream.That notion was
brutally
dispelled on November 23, 1921, when a depressed Fred Kerry wandered
into the
Copley Plaza Hotel in Boston, walked into the men's room, and shot
himself in
the head. The Boston Globe published a short story about the
suicide, which took
place at 11:30 A.M., claiming he had died instantly. "Kerry had been
ill for
some time, and he became despondent as a result," the obituary
read. "He left
his home about the usual hour this morning, and his spirits seemed
to be low.
After going to his place of business he came out and went to the
hotel where he
took his life."
Excerpted from Tour of Duty by Douglas Brinkley."
Source: http://msnbc.msn.com/id/3881447
Kerry Has No Sense of Decency or of Shame No Sense At All
Kerry Worse Than Howard Stern And Howard Dean Combined
Joseph Welch
Joseph Nye Welch (left), chief counsel for the U. S. Army, speaks to
Senator McCarthy during the Army-McCarthy hearings in Washington, D.
C., June, 1954.
http://www.apl.org/HISTORY/MCCARTHY/welch.html

"Welch removed his glasses, stared dolefully at the table and shook
his head. What he said then became the event's dramatic climax, and
a moment more movie-like in its dramatic impact than even most
movies come close to.

"Until this moment, Senator, I think I never really gauged your
cruelty or your recklessness." There was no noise in the huge, high-
ceilinged room save for the sparse clearing of throats. "Let us not
assassinate this lad further, Senator. You have done enough. Have
you no sense of decency sir, at long last? Have you no sense of
decency?"

"Mary Beth Cahill, John Kerry's campaign manager, called Mary
Cheney's sexuality "fair game" in a post-debate interview with Fox
News Wednesday night
(October 13th, 2004)."

"KERRY: I think if you were to talk to Dick Cheney's daughter, who
is a lesbian..." (October 13th, 2004). Bush-Kerry Presidential Debate

"EDWARDS:
..the vice president and his wife...have a gay daughter."
(October 5th, 2004) Cheney-Edwards Vice Presidential Debate


"The vice president's wife, Lynne Cheney, called Kerry "not a good
man" and his remarks about daughter Mary Cheney "a cheap and tawdry
political trick." Meanwhile, Elizabeth Edwards, the wife of vice
presidential candidate John Edwards, suggested in a radio interview
that Mrs. Cheney might feel "a certain degree of shame" because her
daughter is a lesbian."
Source:
http://www.dfw.com/mld/dfw/news/special_packages/election2004/9918392
htm?1c
Nor is this sort of thing new to politics. One typical dirty trick
used
more than once in American politics has been the use of the word
thespian, which to some less than well educated Americans sounds
more than a bit like lesbian.
"Florida's most famous negative campaign was the 1950 U.S. Senate
race between George Smathers and Claude Pepper....the campaign is
best remembered for something that never happened.
It's become enshrined in Florida folklore as the "thespian speech,"
in which Smathers supposedly told slack-jawed rural Floridians that
Pepper was "known in Washington as an extrovert" whose sister was "a
thespian in wicked New York City." Only trouble is, Smathers never
said it; the yarn was probably concocted by bored, condescending
Yankee reporters."
Source: http://www.tallahassee.com/mld/tallahassee/8209847.htm
"In the era of Abraham Lincoln a candidate running against an
opponent who happened to be an actor obliterated that opponent by
running a full page ad in the newspaper accusing him of being
a "Thespian." (Remember this was
before T.V., before John Howard Stern/Howard Dean Kerry.)

"Recognize Distortion Tactics
Name-calling In a classic case, one politician won an election when
he alleged that his opponent "once matriculated" and that his
opponent's wife was a "thespian."

John Failed The American Test Kerry failed to show compassion for
the South
Vietnamese who he felt might be murdered in a North Vietnamese
takeover.
If John Failed The American Test Kerry had been opposed to the
Vietnam War on humanitarian grounds he would have advocated
evacuating any South Vietnamese who might have been in danger in
such a takeover. Instead Kerry said: "I realize that there would be
certain political assassinations, and that might take place....I
think to talk about four or five thousand people is lunacy in terms
of the overall argument and what we're seeking in Southeast Asia."

The truth is that John Failed The American Test Kerry is not a
humanitarian.
"John Kerry: Hunter, Dreamer, Realist Complexity Infuses Senator's
Ambition
By Laura Blumenfeld
Washington Post Staff Writer
Sunday, June 1, 2003; Page A01
John Kerry eats dove. Even better, he shoots them.
From behind the stalks of a Southern cornfield, he'll
watch them flutter and dart, and fire.
"You clean them. Let them hang. It takes three or four
birds to have a meal," said the Massachusetts senator.
"You might eat it at a picnic, cold roasted. I love
dove."
Dove, quail, duck, deer. Kerry described how to hunt
and gut them, talking as he sliced through a steak at
midnight after campaigning all day in Iowa for the
Democratic presidential nomination. Carve out the
heart, he said over dinner, pull out the entrails and
cut up the meat. Bad table manners, perhaps, or good
politics. ... Sitting on his office
balcony at the Senate, he scribbles speeches on yellow
pads. Occasionally, he'll even write poems, like the
one he reluctantly read to a reporter: "I had a talk
with a deer today/ we met upon the road some way . . .
between his frequent snorts/He asked me if I sought
his pelt/cause if I did he said he felt/quite out of
sorts!..."
Source:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A59559-2003May30.html
Part 1 of Complete Kerry / O'Neill debate, 06/30/71
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/americansecrets/message/1577
from:Complete Kerry / O'Neill debate, 06/30/71 (part 2)
Is Kerry Fit or Unfit to be President?
Do the June 30th, 1971 remarks below by
John Forbes Kohn Kerry in reference to
the possibility of a blood-bath in a
Communist takeover of Vietnam make you
believe that Kerry is Fit to be
President or Unfit to be President?
"I realize that there would be certain
political assassinations, and
that might take place. And I think
when you balance that against the
fact that the United States has now
accounted for some 18,600 people
through its own Phoenix program, which
is a program of
assassination, and when you balance
that off against the morality of
the kind of bombing we've been doing
in Laos and the kind of
destruction wholesale of the country
of Vietnam, which amounts to
some 155,000 civilians a year killed,
then I think to talk about
four or five thousand people is lunacy
in terms of the overall
argument and what we're seeking in
Southeast Asia."- John Kerry
Read the rest at:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/americansecrets/message/1577
Please vote for one only thank you.

o Kerry Is Unfit to Be President
o Kerry is Fit to Be President


To vote, please visit the following web page:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/americansecrets/surveys?id=11866784


Kerry said: "I think to talk about four or five thousand people is
lunacy",
when he was discussing the possibility of a blood-bath in a
Communist takeover
of South Vietnam. Rather than showing compassion for the potential
victims
Kerry showed that he could not care less what happened to them.
Kerry was someone who claimed to be an anti-war activist.
The truth is he was really someone who went from being an American
combatant
to becoming someone who met with the enemy and could not care less
about
who the enemy might murder. This writer was an anti-war activist
during the
Indochina war period years before Kerry decided to switch sides and
meet
with America's enemy. Had this writer been in the interview I would
have said
that we need to talk about evacuating any potential victims of a
blood-bath,
I would not have said that "to talk about four or five thousand
people is lunacy." Lives matter. Saving lives is important. Kerry
could not care less.

Kerry and the Paris Peace Talks

In June 1971, Le Duc Tho arrived in Paris to join the North
Vietnamese Communist
delegation to the peace talks. His arrival marked a sea change in the
Communists' approach to advancing their goals via negotiations. Le
Duc Tho was
with Ho Chi Minh one of the original founders of the Communist Party
of
Indochina, one of North Vietnam's chief strategists.

He arrived to join a comrade, Madame Nguyen Thi Binh, who had been a
member of
the Central Committee for the National Front for the Liberation of
the South,
and was now Foreign Minister of the Provisional Revolutionary
Government (PRG)
of South Vietnam. The military arm of the PRG was widely known as the
Viet Cong,
just as Madame Binh was widely recognized as the Viet Cong delegate
to the
conference.

On July 1, 1971, within days of Le Duc Tho's arrival, Madame Binh
advanced a new
7-Point Proposal to end the war. Central to this plan was a cleverly
crafted
provision offering to set a date for the return of U.S. prisoners of
war in
exchange for the Americans setting a date for complete, unilateral
military
withdrawal from Vietnam. In other words, America could have her POWs
back only
if we would agree we lost, surrender, and set a date to leave.

About one year earlier, two young Americans had also come to Paris,
arguably for
their honeymoon -- John Kerry, a young, clean-shaven Navy war
veteran,
accompanied by his new wife, the former Julia Thorne, whose lineage
traced back
to George Washington.

But honeymooning was not John Kerry's only purpose in traveling to
Paris.
Kerry's presidential campaign has now acknowledged that he "talked
privately
with a leading communist representative" there.

On April 22, 1971, as he testified before Senator Fulbright's
Committee on
Foreign Relations, John Kerry mentioned that in Paris he had meetings
with "both
sides" of the Paris Peace Talks. The strong likelihood is that John
Kerry also
met with Le Duc Tho, or some other representative of the North
Vietnamese
delegation, in addition to Madame Binh who was in Paris representing
the PRG.
There is no reason to assume John Kerry had any interest in meeting
with
representatives of the other two sides in the Peace Talks -- the
United States
or South Vietnam.

Madame Binh's proposal was carefully crafted to send a strong
emotional message
to the American home front; that the only barrier to having our POWs
returned
was America's own unwillingness to set a date to withdraw -- even if
the
proposed withdrawal amounted to a defeat. The 7-Point Proposal
directly
challenged the South Vietnamese proposal to set a date for a truce
and a free
election designed to reunify Vietnam. The PRG and the Viet Cong
clearly agreed
with the Premier of Communist China, Cho En-lai that complete
withdrawal of
American military forces from Vietnam was the only precondition that
would be
discussed.

On July 22, 1971, John Kerry called a press conference in Washington,
D.C.
Speaking on behalf of Vietnam Veterans Against the War (VVAW), Kerry
openly
urged President Nixon to accept Madame Binh's 7-Point plan. As the
New York
Times noted the following day, John Kerry suggested that President
Nixon had
refused to set a date for withdrawal because North Vietnam had not
guaranteed
the return of American POWs. Now that the Vietnamese Communists were
promising
to set a POW return date, Kerry argued that Nixon had no reasonable
course left,
except to set a date for withdrawing US military forces. Kerry failed
to mention
one consideration President Nixon most likely found compelling --
that America's
cause was just and that the interests of freedom might best be served
halting
the spread of Communism in Southeast Asia. The U.S., in President
Nixon's view,
had not fought the war to abandon our allies to Communism but to
defend South
Vietnam's right to self-determination.

Today, presidential candidate John Kerry would have us believe that
the only
goal of his anti-war activities was to speak up bravely against a war
he knew to
be without justification. All he wanted to do was to stop a war where
military
policies such as free fire zones, the issuance of .50 caliber machine
guns to
Swift Boats, and tactics such as search-and-destroy led inevitably to
war
crimes, the killing of innocent civilians and the burning of peaceful
villages.

John Kerry today wants us to believe that he has always been an anti-
Communist.
Yet the historical record raises questions about that claim. Loyal
Americans
think twice about violating the legal provision against negotiating
with foreign
powers (18 U.S.C. 953) and the Constitutional prohibition against
giving support
to our nation's enemies during wartime (Article III, Section 3).
Anti-
Communists
do not openly support proposals that amount to an American surrender
to
Communist enemies in time of war.

John Kerry may believe in his own mind that his participation in the
anti-war
cause lifted him to a new moral plane, one where he would not be
restricted by
conventional legal distinctions or common-sense understandings of
patriotism.
Yet the record shows that Kerry and the VVAW consistently coordinated
their
efforts with Communists, both foreign and domestic, represented their
positions,
and repeated their grossly exaggerated claims of American atrocities.
In fact,
it is hard to find any disagreement whatsoever between Kerry's words
and actions
as a leader of the VVAW and those of the Hanoi and Vietcong
leadership. Had
Madame Binh herself been permitted to testify before that Senate
committee in
place of John Kerry, the most noticeable difference might have been
the absence
of a Boston accent.

Jerome R. Corsi, Ph.D.
WinterSoldier.com
http://www.antiterroristamerica.com/cfriends-2.html
I tell you there's something phony going on
Who are the Manchurian Candidates in the 2004 election

In the original Frank Sinatra as Major Marco, version of The
Manchurian
Candidate, (not to be confused with the current remake of the same
film
which features Denzel Washington as Major Marco) , Frank Sinatra, as
Major Marco, says: "For the last six months I've been driven nearly
out of
my mind by the same recurring dream. I tell you there's something
phony
going on. There's something phony about me, about Raymond Shaw, about
the whole medal of honor business. For instance, when the
psychiatrist
asked me how I felt about Raymond Shaw, how I personally felt about
him,
and how the whole patrol felt about him, did you hear what I said?
Did you
really hear what I said? I said Raymond Shaw is the kindest, warmest,
bravest, most wonderful human being I've ever known in my life, and
even
now I feel that way, this minute. And yet somewhere in the back of my
mind something tells me it's not true. It's just not true. It isn't
as if
Raymond's hard to like, he's impossible to like. In fact he's
probably one of
the most replusive human beings I've ever known in my whole, all of
my life. "

Enter your vote today! A new poll has been created for the
americansecrets group:

Who are the real Manchurian Candidates
in the 2004 Presidential Race?
Please vote for as many as you wish.

o John Forbes Kohn Kerry
o George Walker Bush
o Ralph Nader
o Dick Cheney
o Jon Edwards

To vote you must join:
For more information: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/americansecrets
Post message: americansecrets@yahoogroups.com
Subscribe: americansecrets-subscribe@yahoogroups.com


To vote, please visit the following web page:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/americansecrets/surveys?id=11861017
Do arab terrorists believe that they should fear Bush or Kerry most?

The chilling news reported on August
11th, 2004 that arab terrorists are
planning major assassinations to
disrupt the U.S. Presidential
elections is one more reason for
America to be led by someone who
believes that the best defense is a
good offense. Do arab terrorists
believe that they should fear Bush or
Kerry most? Would a President Kerry,
unfettered by Democratic opposition be
more likely to liberate Syria than a
President Bush beset by such
opposition? Or is Kerry an appeaser and
an isolationist at heart. Always the
anti-war activist, unable to
distinguish between evil wars like the
Vietnam War and just wars like the
liberation of Iraq? Will arab
terrorists target Cheney in an attempt
to see him replaced by the appeaser
Colin Powell? Will they target Bush?
Will they target Kerry or Edwards,
both of whom voted for the liberation
of Iraq, in an attempt to see them
replaced by an appeaser like Howard
Dean? Will arab terrorists attempt
again to assassinate former President
Bush, as Saddam did in 1993, and again
on 9/11/2001 when he sent bin Laden to
send planes into the White House where
former President Bush was staying.
Who will arab terrorists target?
Please select as many as you wish.
We hope that all of these potential
arab terrorist targets are safe and
will remain safe.
We must end arab terrorism.
Appeasement and isolationism are not
the answer. We must defend
civilization.

o George Walker Bush
o George Herbert Walker Bush
o John Forbes Kohn Kerry
o Jon Edwards
o Dick Cheney


To vote, please visit the following web page:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/americansecrets/surveys?id=11847948

"A palestinian woman receives free sweets from a vendor as groups of
locals in Jerusalem's Old City celebrate after hearing the news of a
terrorist attack on the World Trade Center in New York, Tuesday,
Sept.
11, 2001." (AP Photo/str)
Source:http://www.canoe.ca/CNEWSWorldTrade0109/photo136.html

Kerry showed on the night of October 13th, 2004, in the Bush-Kerry
Presidential debate that he could care less about Dick and Lynne
Cheney's
daughter and her right to privacy. To Kerry that young woman became
a pawn
in the game, like the four or five thousand people he could not have
cared
less about being slaughtered in Vietnam.
In the same debate,not content to just bash lesbians,and to drag the
Cheney family's daughter into the debate, Kerry went on to slander
Italian-Americans. Kerry said: "Being lectured by the President...is
a little bit like Tony Soprano talking to me about law and order in
this country."

Hearing that line from Kerry was a little bit like deja vu all over
again.
In the September 25, 1988 debate, which was The First Bush-Dukakis
Presidential Debate Massachusetts Governor Michael Dukakis described
Vice President George Herbert Walker Bush as follows:
"(Bush)wants to spend a lot of money on additional programs. If he
keeps this up, he's going to be the Joe Isuzu of American politics."

Source: http://www.debates.org/pages/trans88a.html
"Joe Isuzu was the character from the famous series of
advertisements in
the late 80's featuring the stereotypical car salesman, claiming
that the
Isuzu he was pitching had "gin-u-wine llama-skin leather"
and "enough cargo
room to carry Texas." Advertising Age named the original campaign
one of the
best advertising campaigns of the 20th Century."
Source: http://www.theautochannel.com/news/2001/02/03/013954.html

"Governor Michael Dukakis and Lieutenant Governor John Kerry in
1983. (Globe File Photo)"
Source:
http://www.boston.com/news/local/articles/2004/06/20/dukakis_a_conund
rum_for_kerry/
Did someone say Plagiarism?

Bush Says Kerry's Using Old Dean Lines

Tue Sep 7, 3:18 PM ET

By PETE YOST, Associated Press Writer

LEE'S SUMMIT, Mo. - President Bush (news - web sites) on Tuesday
accused rival
John Kerry (news - web sites) of changing positions on the Iraq
(news - web
sites) war by adopting the language of one-time presidential
candidate Howard
Dean (news - web sites) when Kerry called the conflict "the wrong
war in the
wrong place at the wrong time."


Kerry's criticism came Monday during a campaign stop. Dean had used
such
phrasing in early 2003 when he was the Democratic candidate most
critical of the
war. At the time, Kerry took a more moderate stand, criticizing the
president
for failing to build a broader coalition of allies but not
condemning the war
altogether.


Kerry "woke up yesterday morning with yet another new position, and
this one's
not even his own; it is that of his one-time rival, Howard Dean,"
Bush told
thousands of supporters Tuesday at a rally in the Kansas City
suburbs.


Bush said Kerry "even used the same words Howard Dean did back when
he
supposedly disagreed with him ... Senator Kerry flip-flops. We were
right to
make America safer by removing Saddam Hussein (news - web sites)
from power."


In February 2003, Dean was a little-known candidate for the
Democratic
nomination when he said Bush was focused on "the wrong war at the
wrong time"
concerning Iraq. The month before Dean's remarks, Sen. Edward M.
Kennedy (news,
bio, voting record), D-Mass., used a similar phrase when he said, "I
continue to
be convinced that this is the wrong war at the wrong time."
"Joseph Biden's Plagiarism; Michael Dukakis's 'Attack Video' – 1988
Democratic presidential candidate Joseph R. Biden Jr., a U.S.
senator from
Delaware, was driven from the nomination battle after delivering,
without
attribution, passages from a speech by British Labor party leader
Neil Kinnock.
A barrage of subsidiary revelations by the press also contributed to
Biden's
withdrawal: a serious plagiarism incident involving Biden during his
law school
years; the senator's boastful exaggerations of his academic record
at a New
Hampshire campaign event; and the discovery of other quotations in
Biden's
speeches pilfered from past Democratic politicians.

The controversy became two frenzies in one when it was disclosed
that the
campaign of Massachusetts Gov. Michael S. Dukakis had earlier
secretly
distributed to several news media outlets an "attack video"
juxtaposing the
Biden and Kinnock speeches and revealing Biden's word theft. The
Dukakis
campaign at first stonewalled and denied any part in the tape's
distribution,
but when the truth emerged Dukakis was forced to fire his campaign
manager, John
Sasso, and political director, Paul Tully – the two who had
orchestrated the
maneuver. Dukakis himself insisted he had no prior knowledge of
their actions,
and though wounded, his candidacy survived the incident."

Source:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-
srv/politics/special/clinton/frenzy/biden.htm
"September 12th, 2004
the arrival of veteran political operative John Sasso, who began
traveling at
Kerry's side last week, was greeted with relief by aides. They hope
Sasso can
keep the senator "on message," as one put it."

Source:
http://news.yahoo.com/news?
tmpl=story&u=/latimests/20040912/ts_latimes/divideind\
emocratscamp
"Sasso, he of the attack video that torpedoed the presidential
campaign of
Democratic Senator Joseph R. Biden of Delaware in 1987, he of the
audiotape that
ridiculed the physical disabilities of the wife of Edward King,
Michael
Dukakis's gubernatorial primary opponent in 1982.

Dukakis fired Sasso for lying about his involvement in the video,
which showed
Biden had borrowed without attribution from a speech by a Labor
Party leader in
Britain. He should have canned him for the crass assault on Jody
King's
dignity." read the rest at the
Source:
http://www.boston.com/news/local/articles/2004/09/05/wrong_man_for_ke
rry/

fyi: Kerry served as Dukakis' lieutenant governor for two years,
just before he
won his Senate seat in 1984.


"Dick Cheney's Acceptance Speech August 2nd, 2000
I have seen our military at its finest, with the best equipment, the
best
training, and the best leadership. I'm proud of them.

I have had the responsibility for their well-being. And I can
promise them now,
help is on the way."
Source: http://www.2000gop.com/convention/speech/speechcheney.html
"'Help is on the way,' Kerry tells middle class
Democrat accepts nomination, courts the undecideds
Friday, July 30, 2004"
Source: http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/07/29/dems.main/
fyi re below: we are looking for the exact quote from Caddell, we
heard and saw it too but cannot recall it word for word.

"I just heard Pat Caddell (Carter's old pollster)say that John Sasso
(one of
Kerry's new boys; Sasso ran Dukakis's campaign until he passed out
tapes of Joe
Biden plagiarizing a speech) was the most dishonest guy that Pat
ever met in
politics."
Whether it is Teresa Heinz Kerry's mean spirited comments about
Laura Bush
or the "fair game" comment: "
"Mary Beth Cahill, John Kerry's campaign manager, called Mary
Cheney's sexuality "fair game" in a post-debate interview with Fox
News Wednesday night (October 13th, 2004)." it is clear that the
desperate
Kerry campaign seems to be exploring new depths to plunge into on an
almost
hourly basis. We think that these comments add up to more than slips
of the
lips of Cahill, Heinz-Kerry, Kerry himself, Edwards, and Mrs.
Edwards.
We think they were all quite deliberate and malicious. They show a
willingness
to betray key constituencies, like lesbians and homosexuals if their
finger
in the political wind dictates that Kerry appear to be anti-lesbian
to win
blue-collar Reagan Democrats over in the Rust Belt and Pennsylvania.
Jimmy Carter did a similar thing in the 1976 Pennsylvania Democratic
Presidential Primary when he declared his affinity for "ethnic
purity",
in an appeal to George Wallace racist types.
"Sasso came up with five reasons for the Dukakis loss. Most are
still very
instructive.

"First," Sasso said, "we did not, to my mind, properly or
convincingly, make the
case for change.

"Second, it is politically dangerous to take for granted that voters
will
automatically assume the Democratic candidate holds dear the
country's basic
values: God, patriotism, family, freedom.

"Third, the Republicans routinely field a squad of political
professionals, most
of them now with years of White House and presidential campaign
experience
(while) Democrats somehow field a squad of smart but insurgent
players, who do
not fully understand whole areas of the country and operate far more
narrowly.

"Fourth, the media still have not figured out how to deal
effectively with
negative advertising."

Sasso's fifth reason, however, was the shocker. In 1988, Jesse
Jackson had
garnered about 7 million votes in the primaries and caucuses, while
Dukakis had
gotten about 9 million. Jackson insisted this earned him the right
to be
Dukakis' vice presidential running mate and he threatened to launch
a floor
fight at the convention if he was not selected.

Though Jackson had no realistic hope for the vice presidential slot,
Dukakis had
to spend a great deal of time both publicly and privately soothing
Jackson
before, during and after the convention. To Sasso, this helped doom
the Dukakis
campaign.

"If the presidential candidate disagrees with the party's most
influential black
leader, the candidate must, in my view, break out of his political
fright and
disagree," Sasso said in his speech. "In some ways voters seem to
judge the
strength and skill and character of the Democratic candidate on how
effectively
he gets along with or copes with Jackson. It becomes an unending
litmus test."

These were daring words back then and some credit Sasso with
beginning the
Democratic Party's "liberation" from Jackson's influence. (Others
saw it as a
slap in the face to the man who had probably registered more
Democratic voters
than anyone in history.)

Afterwards, Sasso outlined the on-going, post-convention conflict
between
Dukakis and Jackson. It remains an instructive
disagreement: "Jackson believed
Dukakis was reaching way too far to attract the so-called Reagan
Democrats,
traditional Democrats who in the past couple of elections had voted
in large
numbers Republican. He was convinced we could not lure them back.
Instead, he
wanted us to concentrate on constituencies who had far more
consistently and
faithfully voted Democratic: blacks, Hispanics and those under
economic stress.
He warned us we were slighting these constituencies, taking them for
granted. We
held a different view. We felt it was vital to reach out and broaden
that base.
This was an ongoing debate."
Source: http://www.rogersimon.com/archive/2004_04.html
We do not know when or if Kerry will have his Sister Souljah moment
and
cut the cord to the likes of SharKKKpton and Jesse Jackson, or
whether he
will simply chose to attack African-Americans to win the votes of
white
racists in the same way he chose to attack lesbians to win the votes
of "homophobic" voters, or whether he will lash out at Israel to win
the votes of anti-Semites, or whether he will chose to betray some
other
perceived Democratic constituency to win the votes of those he feels
may
dislike that constituency, what is clear is that Kerry and company
have
no qualms about betraying anyone if it fits their strategy of the
moment. In fact former Clinton Ambassador Richard Holbrooke
(Holbrooke was
Ambassador to BOTH THE UNITED NATIONS AND GERMANY- though sometimes
it
feels more like he was Ambassador FROM GERMANY AND THE UNITED
NATIONS)
said in a recent (October 2004) Fox-TV interview that Kerry, for whom
Holbrooke is a key foreign policy advisor, and is even seen as
Kerry's likely
choice as Secretary of State should he win on November 2nd, 2004,
would
"PUT MORE PRESSURE ON ISRAEL"!!!! Give us a number Senator Kerry,
what
is the number of DEAD JEWS murdered by arafat's GENOCIDE BOMBERS,
whose
families were being paid a bounty by Saddam Hussein that would
satisfy you
enough to say that the liberation of Iraq was the RIGHT war? DO YOU
WANT SIX MILLION MORE JEWS TO BE MURDERED SENATOR KERRY??? WOULD THAT
MAKE YOU HAPPY??? WOULD THAT SATISFY YOU SENATOR KERRY???
To Kerry and company the ends justify the means. The attack plays on
page
one, the apology, if any is ever issued, barely makes it into the
back pages.
The victims of Kerry and company suffer and Kerry and company could
not care
less about that suffering.

Teresa Heinz, formerly Teresa Simões-Ferreira, is now married to
U.S. Senator John Kerry. She has three sons, John, André and
Christopher Heinz. Born and raised in Mozambique, she received a
Bachelor of Arts degree in romance languages and literature (French,
Portuguese and Italian) from the University of the Witwatersrand in
Johannesburg, South Africa. In 1963, she graduated from the
Interpreters School of the University of Geneva. Fluent in 5
languages, she later served as a full-time consultant to the United
Nations Trusteeship in New York City"
fyi: if you click on
http://www.narsil.org/trips/NYC-spring-2004/NYC-spring-2004-
Pages/Image53.html
you will see something described of there as: "Statue in the U.N.
Trusteeship
Council Chamber." we do not know how to describe it ourselves,
perhaps
it is of Teresa the Terrorism Funder standing below the Goose The
Lays The
Golden Egg of Freedom , said Goose having being shot dead recently
by John
Failed The American Test Kerry in his October Disguise.

=====================================================================
====
Igor Sechin - Deputy Director of the Presidential Administration. In
the Soviet
era he worked in Mozambique under cover as a Tekhnoeksport official
(officially
a translator from Portuguese).

=====================================================================
=====
RUSSIA - Profile - Igor Sechin.

APS Review Gas Market Trends; 9/13/2004


A presidential deputy chief of staff and a key member of the
Siloviki, as well
as a former colleague of Putin as a KGB agent, Sechin was in July
appointed as
chairman of RosNeft's board of directors. RosNeft, a state-owned
company, wants
to get YuganskNefteGaz (YNG), a Yukos unit which produces more than
1m b/d.

Sechin's new appointment came one week after the government
announced that it
would sell YNG to recoup taxes owned by Yukos, which ...

=====================================================================
==========P\
utin's rearrangement of the presidential administration was
essentially
technical-bureaucratic in nature, rather than political. Under the
plan, which
was drafted by administration chief of staff Dmitrii Medvedev, the
new structure
will have three levels. At the top will be Medvedev and his two
deputies (under
the old system, there were eight deputy administration heads). The
two remaining
deputies are Vladislav Surkov, who formerly oversaw elections and
work with
political parties and public organizations, and Igor Sechin, who
until recently
was responsible for the president's schedule and for work with
documents. Surkov
is reputed to be close to the so-called Family of the era of former
President
Boris Yeltsin, while Sechin is associated with the "St. Petersburg
chekisty,"
(St. Petersburg chekisty means:KGB veterans)
leading analysts to believe the two will maintain a balance between
the
interests of these groups.
=====================================================================
======
Rosneft Board has appointed Deputy Chairman of President"s
Administration Igor
Sechin its Chairman.
07/28/2004 18:32
Rosneft Board has appointed Deputy Chairman of President"s
Administration Igor
Sechin its Chairman.
Some media call Igor Sechin the "power broker" of Putin"s
administration, and
the author of the secret plan of Russian authorities to take over
YUKOS, the
Daily Telegraph wrote.

The "fall" of YUKOS and its head began in February, 2003 after the
strained
dialog between President Putin and Mikhail Khodorkovsky in the
Kremlin, at the
Presidents meeting with oligarchs. Le Monde wrote that Khodorkovsky
said about
the corruption in the state-owned Rosneft company patronized by
Vladimir Putin.
The President quickly responded, "YUKOS has surpluses of oil
deposits, and how
did it got them?"

It is worth mentioning that Russian Office of Public Prosecutor
initiated legal
proceedings against YUKOS after receiving the letter of Rosneft
President Sergey
Bogdanchikov. He wrote that 19% of Eniseineftegaz (ENG) company
disappeared from
Anglo-Siberian Oil Company (ASOC) controlled by Rosneft. These
shares were
allegedly transferred to offshore company Maastrade Limited, and
YUKOS wrote the
wrong date of the deal. YUKOS claimed that the deal with the ENG
shares was
absolutely legal.

The Financial Times wrote that Rosneft is the main candidate for
purchasing
Yuganskneftegaz - the main oil-drilling structure of YUKOS. It can
be sold out
soon to pay YUKOS tax debts. According to the Financial Times,
Rosneft itself is
short of cash and has many debts. State-owned Sberbank can give a
loan, but it
would be too much for Russian government to give loans to itself to
purchase
confiscated assets, wrote the newspaper.

The Die Welt also believes that Rosneft is likely to purchase the
valuable
YUKOS" property. Despite bad management, Rosneft can become basis
for powerful
Russian state-owned oil corporation.

Previously the Daily Telegraph wrote on Igor Sechin"s plan to take
over YUKOS"
oil by getting control over the oil in Transneft monopoly pipelines.
This plan
can be implemented as well.
=====================================================================
========
Rosneft's new chairman has no oil experience. Sechin studied French
and
Portuguese at Leningrad State University, and Russian news media
have reported
that he was recruited by the KGB. He went to Africa as an
interpreter for a
Soviet equipment export company, returning to work in city
government in
Leningrad, since renamed St. Petersburg. In 1991, he became an aide
to Putin,
then a city official, and has followed his boss's rise.

Now Kremlin deputy chief of staff, Sechin has rarely appeared in
public and does
not give interviews. Along with fellow deputy chief Viktor Ivanov,
another KGB
veteran, he leads the clan of hard-liners called the siloviki, or
men of power.
He has an inside line to the prosecutors pursuing Khodorkovsky,
since Sechin's
daughter last year reportedly married the son of Prosecutor General
Vladimir
Ustinov.

The rise of the siloviki has inspired fear. When NTV television
asked Arkady
Volsky, president of the Russian Union of Industrialists and
Entrepreneurs, who
he thought was behind the moves against Yukos, he refused to say. "I
am very
scared to name names now," he said. "I am simply scared. I have six
grandchildren, after all, and I want them to live."
=====================================================================
=========
We do not know which, if any KGB agents Sechin may or may not have
followed
in the footsteps of in Mozambique, or if any of them made contact
there with the
young Teresa years before she became Teresa Heinz Kerry, but the
Soviet KGB was
nothing if not methodical. In its own plodding sort of way it
repeated and
repeated and repeated its steps around the world time after time
after time, as
it perpetrated lie after lie, after lie, after lie.
=====================================================================
=========="\
October 18, 2004
Russian President Putin favors Bush over Kerry

DUSHANBE, Tajikistan - Russian President Vladimir Putin said Monday
that
terrorists are aiming to derail President Bush's chances at re-
election through
attacks in Iraq, the latest in a series of comments indicating that
Putin favors
Bush in the upcoming vote.
"I consider the activities of terrorists in Iraq are not as much
aimed at
coalition forces but more personally against President Bush," Putin
said at a
news conference after a regional summit in the Tajik capital,
Dushanbe.

"International terrorism has as its goal to prevent the election of
President
Bush to a second term," he said. "If they achieve that goal, then
that will give
international terrorism a new impulse and extra power."

Putin declined to specify which candidate he wants to win the U.S.
presidential
election on Nov. 2. "We unconditionally respect any choice of the
American
people," he said. "I don't want to spoil relations with either
candidate."

Putin also noted his continuing disagreement with Bush on
Washington's invasion
of Iraq, which Russia strongly opposed as a permanent member of the
U.N.
Security Council. "Russia was always against the military operations
in Iraq,"
he said.

But the statement equating a Bush defeat with a terrorist victory
was a clear
indication of support for the incumbent.

Putin and his Kremlin advisers seem to view Bush as a pragmatic
leader perhaps
less likely than Democratic nominee John Kerry to confront Russia
seriously on
issues like the war in Chechnya and authoritarian political moves
widely seen as
steps away from democracy.

In a Sept. 30 debate, Kerry voiced concerns about conditions in
Russia, saying
Putin has taken steps that go beyond what's necessary to combat
terror.

Bush treaded more lightly, saying his personal relationship with
Putin "enables
me to better comment to him and the better to discuss with him some
of the
decisions he makes." He said Russia was in transition and that he
would remind
Putin "of the great benefits of democracy."

Putin and Bush both say they have a good relationship, and despite
their
differences over Iraq they have cooperated in the international war
on terror.

Russia assented to the deployment of U.S. forces in former Soviet
Central Asia
for operations in neighboring Afghanistan, and Washington has mostly
looked the
other way on allegations of human rights abuses in the war in
Chechnya, which
Russia alleges is being fueled by international terror groups.

On his last visit to Central Asia in June, Putin appeared to back
Bush's
assertion that Iraq was a threat, saying at a summit in Kazakhstan
that Russia
had notified Washington about intelligence that Saddam Hussein's
regime was
preparing attacks in the United States and its interests abroad."

Source: http://www.katu.com/news/story.asp?ID=71922
The piece above raises many questions. First is Putin lying or
telling the
truth? Second is Kerry lying or telling the truth? We know that
Kerry met
with Madame Binh as discussed earlier in this post. North Vietnam
was then
a Soviet client state. We know the rumors,true or false, are out
there about
Teresa Heinz Kerry allegedly having been a Soviet KGB "Honey Trap"
agent while
she was involved with the United Nations. Who does Putin really
favor in the
U.S.Presidential election?
=====================================================================
=========
"Abrams tanks have been knocked out near An Najaf,(Iraq), by the
AT14 "Kornet,"
a new Russian-built, solider-carried anti-tank rocket somewhat
similar to the
new U.S. "Javelin" weapon. Kornets are laser-guided for accuracy and
employ an
advanced kinetic penetrator (extreme speed, not explosive power, is
the key
feature) to break through the layered, "composite" armor used by the
Abrams and
other advanced tanks.And the key connection
Because the Kornet was first fielded in 1994, obviously Iraq
obtained it in
violation of the U.N. embargo. A large shipment of Kornets was sold
by Russia to
Syria in 1998, so peace-loving Syria may be the violator. A few
Kornets were
also aboard the Karine A, the weapons ship intercepted on its way to
(arafat)"
=====================================================================
=========="\
Evidence is emerging which supports long-held contentions that
Russia violated
the arms sanctions placed against the Saddam Hussein regime
following the end of
the first Gulf war. Illegal arms supplies, which once found their
way to
Saddam's military, may well flow to guerrilla forces displeased with
the
prospect of a U.S. military administration in post-Saddam Iraq.

Moscow's persistent denial of arms sales to Saddam is becoming
increasingly
unbelievable following the destruction of two advanced U.S. Abrams
M1 tanks by
Russian-made "Kornet" missiles.

The Kornet is a portable missile capable of being laser-guided, and
has a range
of over three miles. Iraq is believed to have purchased some 1500 of
the
weapons, according to a recent report by Radio Free Europe/Radio
Liberty.

The exact route the Kornets took to Iraq is unknown, but many
speculate that
friends of Russia, including Belarus, Ukraine, or Syria acted as
middlemen.

Russia is also believed to have sold night-vision equipment and "GPS-
Jammer"
devices to Saddam's military.

The Russian GPS-Jammers may be responsible for some of the civilian
casualties
in the Iraq conflict. Because the GPS-Jammers can interfere with the
remote
guidance of U.S. missiles, it is possible that a missile could be
deflected from
its intended target and mistakenly hit a civilian location.

Although the U.S. has methods to counter the Jammers, the use of the
Jammers
could still result in a missile going up to 50 feet off target, and
possibly
cause unintended damage, Der Spiegel reported.

Moscow's influence in Iraq may not come to an end with the
destruction of
Saddam's dictatorship. Forces hostile to a U.S. military
administration in Iraq
will be searching for friends and sources for military hardware."
=====================================================================
==========
Frankly we would love it if Russia and America could become allies
in the
war against arab and other Islamic terrorists. We would love it even
more
if the American President who made that alliance was someone who was
not
suspected of being a Russian agent, and was not suspected of being
married to a
Russian agent. We would love to see Kosovo given back to the Serbian
people. We
think it would help to pave the way for a real Russian-American
alliance
against terrorists. When Bill Clinton turned the U.S. Air Force into
Air bin
Laden, to support Osama bin Laden's terrorists on the ground, who
were allied
with Al Queda type multinational terrorists linked historically to
Iraq in
the Balkan War of the 1990s Clinton waged against Serbian
Christians, Jews,
and other non-Moslems he severely set back the chances of such an
alliance.
Like the Mafia boss of all bosses he fancies himself to be, as he
watches videos of his favorite movie, "The Godfather", and its
sequels, Saddam uses "cut-outs" to separate himself from his
international terrorism, so that he can maintain "plausible
deniability". During the evil war against Serbia of the 1990s the
back-stabbing Saddam pretended to embrace the Serbian
cause but secretly engaged in anti-Serbian terrorism in the Balkans.
"during the night of July 18th -19th ,1998 a group of several hundred
heavily armed foreign mercenaries
(mostly "mujahideens, "Islamic "holy
warriors") frontally attacked from Albania the Yugoslav Army border
guards near the Djeravici mountain. The attack was repulsed by the
Serbian troops, and the foreign assailants suffered heavy casualties.
Among the dead were six mercenaries from Yemen, five from Saudi
Arabia, four from Macedonia. A short while later, Yugoslav
authorities
arrested Nuri Salip Muhamed, a Lieutenant Colonel in the Iraqi Army
as
he was trying to enter Yugoslavia illegally from Bulgaria. This Iraqi
officer, who reportedly spoke perfect Serbian, was supposed to have
commanded the July 18th-19th, 1998 terrorist attack from Albania. But
lucky for him, he had not arrived there in time."


Bill Clinton is no longer in the White House. We feel that George W.
Bush
will and should beat John Failed The American Test Kerry on November
2nd, 2004.
If he does not Bill Clinton's buddies from the Balkan Wars may well
be key Kerry appointees.
=====================================================================
==========
"Sinclair Airs Anti-Kerry Material

Sat Oct 23rd, 2004

By ALEX DOMINGUEZ, Associated Press Writer

BALTIMORE - Sinclair Broadcast's program featuring material from a
documentary
critical of John Kerry (news - web sites) aired Friday night,
devoting as much
coverage to the controversy as the film that sparked the uproar.The
program
contained a few minutes from the documentary, "Stolen Honor: Wounds
That Never
Heal," as well as excerpts from a pro-Kerry documentary, interviews
with
veterans who support and oppose Kerry, and a segment on the impact
of new media
such as the Internet on politics. A history of the controversy that
erupted
following reports of the upcoming program was also given, including
assessments
such as "before anything had been decided, spin alley had become a
superhighway." On Tuesday, the company...announced the program would
appear on
40 stations and would feature parts, but not all, of "Stolen Honor,"
which
consists of interviews with U.S. prisoners of war who survived
imprisonment in
Hanoi and remain enraged at Kerry for joining the anti-war
movement..."

Source:
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?
tmpl=story&ncid=1963&e=13&u=/ap/20041023/ap_en_\
tv/kerry_film_6

Action you can take now before the election:
First: Urge Sinclair, and Fox to air the entire Stolen Honor film
unedited,uncut, uncompromised by the Boston Brahim who wants to ban
it.
The American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee:
What the Record Reveals
I. Defending Hezbollah:
1. Asked by Geraldo Rivera, "How do you stand about Hezbollah and
Hamas? Do
you condemn them?," ADC spokesman Hussein Ibish said: "No. I think
that
Hezbollah fought a very good war against the Israelis, a guerrilla
war..."
(Rivera Live, CNBC, June 5, 2000)
2. "Everywhere Hezbollah fighters, derided by the Israeli and U.S.
governments as 'terrorists,' conducted themselves in an exemplary
manner...[They
are] a disciplined and responsible liberation force."
--ADC spokesman Hussein Ibish, Los Angeles Times, May 26, 2000
3. "I find it shocking...that [one] would include Hezbollah in...[an]
inventory of Middle East 'terrorist' groups...Hezbollah is a
Lebanese resistance
organization engaged in the legitimate defense of Lebanese land...[t]
his hardly
qualifies as terrorism."
--ADC president Hala Maksoud, Washington Times, Aug. 25, 1996
4. "We are all proud of the heroic resistance of its people and their
steadfastness."
--ADC president Maksoud, referring to Hezbollah, ADC Times, June-
July 1996
5. ADC president Hala Maksoud says she supports "the Lebanese and
Palestinian
resistance against occupation," and that Hezbollah is "a resistance
organization
engaged in the legitimate defense of Lebanese land."
--Commentary, Jan.1999
6. The ADC has "campaigned against two 1997 amendments forbidding
most
financial transactions with state sponsors of terrorism."
--Commentary, Jan. 1999

II Defending Hamas
1. "I will not call it a terrorist organization. I mean, I know many
people
in Hamas. They are very respectable. They don't accept violence. And
I don't
believe Hamas, as an organization, is a violent organization."
--then-ADC president Hamzi Moghrabi, Rocky Mountain News, Nov. 27,
1994
2. "Most outrageous of all the allegations 'reported' by Symmes was
his
opinion that 'Hamas is a band of murderers'."
--then-ADC president Albert Mokhiber, Washington City Paper, June
11, 1993
3. "We strongly urge the United States not to extradite [senior
Hamas leader]
Dr. [Mousa] Abu Marzook to Israel..."
--ADC president Hala Maksoud, in an ADC press release, January 31,
1997

III. Accusing the U.S. of "Genocide"

1. "Embargoes and blockades are genocide." [From a "Children's March
to the
UN" leaflet, signed by ADC and other groups, advertising a July 1,
1998 rally]

2. Referred to "the genocidal effects of these sanctions on innocent
Iraqi
children, women and men"
--Letter, ADC president Hala Maksoud, Washington Post, February 15,
1997

3. "While there have been levels of non-compliance by Iraq, the
regime has
conformed with most of the requirements to dismantle its weapons of
mass
destruction."
--ADC press release, Nov. 9, 1997

4. "Ignoring this massive human suffering [in Iraq] is ultimately
based on
the racist premise that the lives of Iraqis are less than human."
--ADC Action Alert, October 22, 1997

5. "It is shocking that the US would again target the long-suffering
Iraqi
people with lawless missile attacks."
--ADC press release, January 25, 1999


IV. Anti-Semitic Statements
1. "You and I both know that Marlon Brando was quite right when he
pointed
out that Jews run Hollywood. The decision-makers, the play-callers,
are Jews,
completely out of proportion to their numbers.
--ADC Los Angeles president Donald Bustany, Jerusalem Report,
Oct.17, 1996
2. "Some Jews ... seem to believe that God has chosen them. And,
imbued with
a strong resolve by that belief, [they have] appropriated the
property of others
under circumstances that the rest of the world recognizes as
outright theft.
Three thousand years ago the Jewish people--led by Moses, Joshua,
King Saul and
King David--took by force the land of the people of Canaan. In this
century--still led by Moses in a sense--they took by force and some
unsavory
diplomacy the land of the Arabs of Palestine."
--ADC Los Angeles president Donald Bustany, Washington
Report on Middle East Affairs, December 1995

The Zionist Organization of America, founded in 1897, is the oldest
pro-Israel
organization in the United States. The ZOA works to strengthen U.S.-
Israel
relations, educates the American public and Congress about the
dangers that
Israel faces, and combats anti-Israel bias in the media and on
college campuses.
Its past presidents have included Supreme Court Justice Louis
Brandeis and Rabbi
Dr. Abba Hillel Silver.
"Islamic Group Congratulates McKinney on Primary Win
(CNSNews.com) - The Council on American-Islamic Relations is
congratulating
former U.S. Rep. Cynthia McKinney for winning her primary race in
Georgia's 4th
congressional district.


McKinney beat five other Democrats on Tuesday, with enough votes to
avoid a
runoff, and as CAIR noted, she is favored to win her old seat back
in November.


CAIR calls McKinney "a consistent friend of the American Muslim
community and a
strong advocate for issues of concern to Muslims, particularly the
promotion of
social justice and the defense of civil liberties."


Her pro-Palestinian views have not gone over well with Jewish
voters, however.


McKinney made national headlines in October 2001 for pursuing a $10
million
charitable contribution from a Saudi prince -- money intended to
help victims of
the Sept. 11 terror attacks.


New York City Mayor Rudolph Giuliani angrily returned the check,
after Saudi
Prince Alwaleed bin Talal suggested that U.S. Middle East policy
contributed to
the terrorist attacks. The prince urged the U.S. to "re-examine its
policies in
the Middle East and adopt a more balanced stance toward the
Palestinian cause."


Then in March 2002, McKinney suggested the Bush administration had
failed to act
on prior warnings of the Sept. 11 attacks.


In an interview with a Berkeley radio station, McKinney said, "We
know there
were numerous warnings of the events to come on September 11th .
What did this
administration know and when did it know it, about the events of
September 11th?
Who else knew, and why did they not warn the innocent people of New
York who
were needlessly murdered? What do they have to hide? Persons close
to this
administration are poised to make huge profits off America's new
war," she
charged.


First elected to Congress in 1992, McKinney served five terms until
her primary
defeat in 2002. Although she drew heavy support from the Muslim
community, she
could not overcome a determined Republican bid to oust her.


Thousands of Republicans crossed over and voted for Denise Majette
in the 2002
Democratic primary, adding to Majette's considerable support from
Jewish voters.


Following her defeat, McKinney vowed she'd be back, and it looks
like she was
right.


CAIR this week hailed McKinney's "promotion of balanced and forward-
looking
policies."


Source:
http://www.townhall.com/news/politics/200407/POL20040723c.shtml

Source: http://www.zoa.org/pressrel2003/20030925a.htm
The "official" story about how John Forbes Kohn Kerry met his second
wife
Teresa is as follows: "Kerry and Teresa Simões-Ferreira Heinz, the
widow of
Pennsylvania Senator H. John Heinz III and formerly a United Nations
translator, met at the UN-sponsored Earth Summit at Rio de Janeiro
in 1992. They married on May 26, 1995 in Nantucket, Massachusetts."
Source: Source:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Kerry

You will forgive our skepticism about that story when you realize
that
the late Senator Heinz,Al Gore, and Senator Kerry were all very
close friends who worked together on exposing Iraqgate, the arming
of Saddam Hussein. We find it highly implausible that those 3 very
close friends would not have had family gatherings or similar social
events of some type while all 3 were working closely togehter that
would have brought Senator Kerry together with Teresa Heinz.
In fact our skepticism about that story is confirmed by the story
below
which states that Teresa Heinz met John Forbes Kohn Kerry for the
first time
in 1990, while Senator Heinz was still alive, not in 1992, as the
wikipedia
excerpt above would have us believe. Why the discrepancy? Why the
effort to state that the 2 did not meet while Senator Heinz was still
alive?
In 1990, a
year before Heinz's death, Teresa Heinz met John Kerry. With her
boys grown up, she was deepening her involvement in environmental
affairs and attended an Earth Day event in Washington, DC. Jack
Heinz introduced them.

When the two saw each other again as delegates to the 1992 Earth
Summit in Brazil, Teresa Heinz was newly widowed. By all accounts,
it was a fascinating trip. The assassination of rain forest activist
Chico Mendes was still being felt, and environmentalists were upset
about a proposed highway to be built into the heart of the Amazon
jungle....
When they found themselves at the same Washington dinner party a few
months later, Kerry invited Teresa Heinz for a romantic walk.
Kerry ...was considered one of the most eligible single men in the
country. His name was linked in the press to women like Catherine
Oxenberg and Morgan Fairchild. But Teresa Heinz's earthy
sophistication won him over. "Definitely sexy," he has called
her. "Very earthy sexy, European." They began dating in 1993, then
living together. Two years later, they married on Nantucket."

Source: http://www.bostonmagazine.com/ArticleDisplay.php?id=258
We do not know where wikipedia got the material it used to set 1992,
after
Senator Heinz had been killed, rather than 1990, while Senator Heinz
was still alive, as the year when Teresa Heinz met John Forbes Kohn
Kerry.
Kerry's website documents the 1990 meeting,with an interesting
environmental spin to it as follows:

"Their mutual interest in environmental issues brought Teresa and
John together. She was first introduced to John Kerry by Senator
Heinz at an Earth Day rally in 1990. In 1992, she met Kerry again at
the Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro..."

http://www.johnkerry.com/about/teresa_heinz_kerry/

Was this the first meeting? We do not know. But we do know the two
met
while Senator Heinz was still alive.
Here is one we do not believe, note Wikipedia has updated its story
on
the Teresa meetings with Kerry, we still do not believe them however:
"Kerry and his second wife, Teresa Simões-Ferreira Heinz, the widow
of
Pennsylvania Senator H. John Heinz III, a moderate Republican, and
former United
Nations translator, were introduced to each other by John Heinz at
an Earth Day
rally in 1990. They did not meet again until after John Heinz's
death, at the
1992 Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro."
Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Kerry
They now admit that Kerry met Teresa while Senator Heinz was still
alive.
They go to great pains to state that:"They did not meet again until
after John
Heinz's death, at the 1992 Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro."
The question is why? How do they know that :"They did not meet again
until after
John Heinz's death, at the 1992 Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro."
How do they know that the 1990 meeting was the first meeting, or the
last
before the 1992 meeting? Both Kerry and Heinz were at Yale and in
Skull
and Bones. Isn't it possible, perhaps even likely, that Kerry met
Teresa
even before 1990? And that they continued to see each other, perhaps
romantically, while Senator Heinz was still alive? We cannot state
that to
be a fact, we have no fabricated or forged documents, this is not
the Dan
Rather show, but we can suspect that. One thing is certain, now even
Wikipedia admits that it is certain: Kerry met Teresa while her
husband,
Senator Heinz was still alive. Another thing is certain. Senator
Heinz
ended up dead. Another thing is certain: Kerry ended up married to
Teresa.
Another thing is certain Teresa ended up with the Heinz money.
A billion here, a billion there, to paraphrase Senator Dirksen's
long ago
remark.

Does Art Imitate Life? Does Art Imitate Life?
The 1998 Movie A Perfect Murder is a remake of the 1954 Hitchcock
Classic
Dial M for Murder,in which An ex-tennis pro carries out a plot to
murder his wife.

"Three people. One triangle. A wealthy and powerful husband. The
intelligent, beautiful young woman he married. Her soulful and
attractive lover. A dangerous combination, to be sure. Perhaps a
deadly one...
Millionaire industrialist Steven Taylor (MICHAEL DOUGLAS) is a man
who has everything but what he craves most -- the love and fidelity
of his wife. A hugely successful entity in the high-stakes New York
financial world, Taylor proudly considers Emily Bradford Taylor
(GWYNETH PALTROW) his most treasured acquisition....But Emily wants--
and needs-- more than just her role as a dazzling accessory in her
husband's world. Brilliant and sophisticated in her own right,
Emily, who works as a multi-lingual translator and aide to the U.S.
Ambassador to the United Nations, has been involved with David Shaw
(VIGGO MORTENSEN), a talented but struggling downtown artist who
provides the emotional fulfillment for Emily that Steven cannot and
will not muster...."
Source:
http://aperfectmurder.warnerbros.com/cmp/production.html

John Kerry: "I'll tell you, I have found [something] in windsurfing-
and I don't have a magnifier, but I suppose that somebody
can find it on a tennis court. I mean I love to play tennis. It's a
great sport."
Source:
http://www.americanwindsurfer.com/mag/back/issue5.5/kerry2.html

Where does all of this lead? We do not know. We cannot allege that
Teresa Heinz
conspired with John Kerry in the death of Senator Heinz. We can
wonder
whether the cosmoplitan multi-lingual U.N. translator Teresa Heinz
might have
expressed support for arabist causes to arab diplomats while at the
U.N.
We can wonder whether those comments, if made at all, might have
been passed
on to arab terrorists who might have assassinated Senator Heinz, who
was
a friend of Israel,and an enemy of arabists, so that Teresa Heinz
could inherit his fortune unbeknownst to Teresa Heinz herself.

By doing so those arab terrorists would have removed an
enemy,Senator Heinz, who was a potential Presidential contender, and
perhaps have placed a potential friend, Teresa Heinz,in charge of
the Heinz fortune.

If they were really good at it those terrorists might have known
about
the existence of the Heinz-Kerry relationship while Senator Heinz
was still
alive. How deep did that relationship go? We do not know. It could
have
been just a casual friendship. It could have been more. It is
interesting
that Joe Lockhart, who was brought in to the Clinton White House to
help
Clinton's spin on his relationship with Monica Lewinsky has joined
the
Kerry team and is linked also to Dan Rather story.

If they delved deeply into Kerry's past they might have discovered
his
sympathy with America's enemy the communist Vietnamese and his
meeting
with them.

"A Brief Background On Mrs. John Kerry
(She hates being called that, by the way.)

Maria Teresa Thiersten Simoes-Ferreira Heinz Kerry married John
Kerry in 1995. She only took his name eighteen months ago and she is
an "interesting" paradox of conflicts. If you thought John Kerry was
scary, he doesn't hold a candle to his wife!

Maria Teresa Thiersten Simoes-Ferreira Heinz Kerry was born in
Mozambique, the daughter of a Portuguese physician, was educated in
Switzerland and South Africa. Fluent in five languages, she was
working as a United Nations interpreter in Geneva in the mid-60's
when she met a "handsome" young American, H. John Heinz, III, who
worked at a bank in Geneva. He told her his family was "in the food
business."

They were married in 1966 and returned to Pittsburgh where his
family ran the giant H. J. Heinz food company. He was elected to the
U.S. House of Representatives in 1971, and in 1976 he was elected to
the first of three terms in the United States Senate. A Republican,
Senator John Heinz wrote a burning diatribe against some of the
causes backed by young House member John Kerry.)

Several years later, in 1991, he was killed when his plane collided
with a Sun Oil Company helicopter over a Philadelphia suburb. The
Senator, his pilot and copilot, and both of Sun's helicopter pilots
were killed. He was survived by his wife, Maria Teresa Thiersten
Simoes-Ferreira Heinz, and their three young sons.

Four years later, having inherited Heinz's $500 million fortune,
Maria Teresa Thiersten Simoes-Ferreira Heinz Kerry married Senator
John Forbes Kerry, the liberal then-junior Senator from
Massachusetts.... Heinz Kerry is not shy about telling people that
she required Kerry to sign a prenuptial agreement before they were
married....

So how does Maria Teresa Thiersten Simoes-Ferreira Heinz Kerry spend
John Heinz' money? Just one example: According to the G2 Bulletin,
an online intelligence newsletter of World Net Daily, in the years
between 1995-2001 she gave more than $4 million to an organization
called the Tides Foundation. And what does the Tides Foundation do
with John Heinz's money? They support numerous antiwar groups,
including Ramsey Clark's International Action Center. Clark has
offered to defend Saddam Hussein when he's tried.

They support the Democratic Justice Fund, a joint venture of the
Tides Foundation and billionaire hate-monger George Soros. The
Democratic Justice Fund seeks to ease restrictions on Muslim
immigration from "terrorist" states. They support the Council for
American-Islamic Relations, whose leaders are known to have close
ties to the terrorist group, Hamas.

They support the National Lawyers Guild, organized as a communist
front during the Cold War era. One of their attorneys, Lynne
Stewart, has been arrested for helping a client, Sheikh Omar Abdel
Rahman, communicate with terror cells in Egypt. He is the convicted
mastermind of the 1993 World Trade Center bombing.

They support the "Barrio Warriors," a radical Hispanic group whose
primary goal is to return all of Arizona, California, New Mexico,
and Texas to Mexico. These are but a few of the radical groups that
benefit, through the anonymity provided by the Tides Foundation,
from the generosity of our would-be first lady, the wealthy widow of
Republican Senator John Heinz, and now the wife of the Democratic
senator who aspires to be the 44th President of the United States.

Aiding and supporting our enemies is not good for America,
regardless of your political views. If voters will open their eyes,
educate them-selves and see the real Maria Teresa Thiersten Simoes-
Ferreira Heinz Kerry, they will not appreciate her position as ultra
rich fairy godmother of the radical left. They will not want to
imagine her laying her head on a pillow each night inches away from
the President of the United States.

Hopefully they love this country enough to decide that the only way
these two will ever be allowed into the White House is with an
engraved invitation in hand. Please help us by letting everyone know
the Kerrys are unfit to represent this great nation.

The uninformed will never hear the truth from the press, who want
Kerry elected! Those who buy the Kerry facade, beware of what you
vote for – you may regret what you get!"
Source: http://www.clockguy.com/KerryReason3.html
Al Sharpton supports Klans right to rally
Among those supporting the KKKs right to march were activist Al
Sharptons National Action Network and the Amsterdam News, a
newspaper that calls itself a significant voice of Black
America.
Source
http://www.cnn.com/US/9910/23/klan.02/#2

KERRY-AL LOVE FEST
Mon May 10th 2004
By FREDRIC U. DICKER
TERESA Heinz Kerrys weekend embrace of the Rev. Al Sharpton
hints at
a behind-the-scenes struggle between John Kerry and the Rev. Jesse
Jackson , Democratic insiders told The Post.
The insiders said Jackson has been aggressively pressuring Kerrys
campaign to hire several of his key political aides - as well as
agreeing to
give him a chance to address the Democratic National Convention in
Boston this summer during a prime-time television broadcast.
Jesse is up to his old tricks again, threatening to peddle
stories
that Kerry is
hostile to blacks, if he doesnt get what he wants, said a
prominent New York Democrat familiar with the situation.
Obviously, Teresa Kerrys visit to the [Sharpton-run National
Action]
Network was a direct shot at Jesse, who has been noticeably absent
from the

Kerry presidential campaign, the Democrat continued.
Mrs. Kerry heard Sharpton say her husbands campaign was more
racially inclusive in this stage of the contest than was the Clinton
campaign 12 years ago.
Source:
http://news.yahoo.com/news
tmplstory&u/nypost/20040510/cm_nypost/kerryallovefest


Al Sharpton is a racist anti-Semite with blood on his
hands, said Chris Paulitz, a spokesman for the RNC in Washington who
is gathering information on controversial Sharpton statements on
beha lf of Jim
Nicholson, the national chairman. He is the David Duke of the
Democrat Party¡. The RNC is also circulating comments by Republican
Jewish
Coalition Director Matthew Brooks that Al Sharptons record of
bigotry,
racism and anti-Semitism is well-documented and beyond question.
Source: http://www.jewishsf.com/bk000317/usgoresharpton.shtml

Rosenbaum Family

Investigate Sharpton


By Hy Drusin
Mr. Isaac Abraham, a spokesman for Rosenbaum family, who has worked
to obtain justice for Yankel Rosenbaum [murdered during the 1991
Crown
Heights riots in which rampaging blacks attacked Hasidic Jews],
issued the

following statement urging a full federal investigation of the role
of Al
Sharpton in the massacre at Freddys clothing store in Harlem:
This time the Rev. Al Sharpton is caught on tape spreading hate
against Jews and whites. In Crown Heights, Sharpton did his share in
inciting
the riots but former Police Commissioner Lee Brown only said Sharpton
came close to the line of inciting but did not actually cross it
and did nothing. That is why we support the Jewish Action Alliances
demand that a full federal investigation of Al Sharptons role in the
Harlem
Massacre be instituted full speed ahead and with all recourse, in
contrast to the slow process that the Justice Department has taken
on the Crown Heights
riots and the murder of Yankel Rosenbaum.
Source: http://www.jewishpost.com/jewishpost/jpn201e.html

A JEWISH POST EXCLUSIVE REVEREND SHARPTONS ANTI-SEMITIC & RACIST
BROADCASTS
Complete Transcript of the Hate Tape
Inflamatory Words that Caused Fi re at Freddys
For years, anti-Semitic and racist hate-mongering has been broadcast
shamelessly by all the major black radio stations. In the months
before the

Harlem Massacre, the Reverend Al Sharpton and others broadcast a
series
of rallies attacking non-black Harlem store owners in the vilest of
terms.

The arson which killed 8 people at Freddys clothing store on
December 9,

truly proved that those broadcasts were inflammatory, and those
words,
incendiary.
The Jewish Action Alliance has been taping these stations for years
and
therefore was able quickly to provide tape copies of these broadcasts
to the
police and press. The Jewish Post has had this tape professionally
transcribed. Unlike the New York Times, the New York Post, and the
Daily
News, all of which printed just a few excerpts, all the relevant
material on
the JAA tape which may put Al Sharpton out of businessis
printed
below
For Complete Transcripts of the Following Broadcasts
Click on the links immediately below:
http://www.jewishpost.com/jewishpost/sharp01.html

http://www.jewishpost.com/jewishpost/sharp02.html

http://www.jewishpost.com/jewishpost/sharp03.html

http://www.jewishpost.com/jewishpost/sharp04.html

http://www.jewishpost.com/jewishpost/sharp05.html

http://www.jewishpost.com/jewishpost/sharp06.html

http://www.jewishpost.com/jewishpost/sharp07.html

Source: http://www.jewishpost.com/jewishpost/jpn201g.html





Teresa Heinz Kerry: Bag Lady for the Radical Left
By Ben Johnson
FrontPageMagazine.com | February 13, 2004

With Matt Drudge's recent revelation that John Kerry is as faithful
to his second wife as he was to his old Vietnam "brothers," the
senator's presidential campaign may depend more than ever on the
actions of his wife, Teresa Heinz Kerry. While the mainstream media
has thus far overlooked the alleged infidelity, media outlets have
also overlooked a far more important story: The former Mrs. John
Heinz is also in bed – financially – with the radical Left.

Teresa Heinz Kerry has financed the secretive Tides Foundation to
the tune of more than $4 million over the years. The Tides
Foundation, a "charity" established in 1976 by antiwar leftist
activist Drummond Pike, distributes millions of dollars in grants
every year to political organizations advocating far-Left causes.
The Tides Foundation and its closely allied Tides Center, which was
spun off from the Foundation in 1996 but run by Drummond Pike,
distributed nearly $66 million in grants in 2002 alone. In all,
Tides has distributed more than $300 million for the Left. These
funds went to rabid antiwar demonstrators, anti-trade demonstrators,
domestic Islamist organizations, pro-terrorists legal groups...

During the years 1995-2001, the Howard Heinz Endowment, which Heinz
Kerry chairs, gave Tides more than $4.3 million. The combined Heinz
Endowments (composed of the Howard Heinz Endowment and the Vira I.
Heinz Endowment) donated $1.6 million to establish the Tides Center
for Western Pennsylvania, a Pittsburgh office of the San Francisco-
based Tides Center....it is the Tides Foundation's national
organization whose connections are most disconcerting.

The Tides Foundation is a major source of revenue for some of the
most extreme groups on the Left. Tides allows donors to anonymously
contribute money to a host of causes; the donor simply makes the
check out to Tides and instructs the Foundation where to forward the
money. Tides does so. The Tides Center will even manage a left-wing
project, for a nominal fee. Drummond Pike told The Chronicle of
Philanthropy, "Anonymity is very important to most of the people we
work with." That becomes understandable when one views the list of
Tides grant recipients. And who are the beneficiaries of this money?

The Antiwar Movement


Senator John F. Kerry has gone far with his nuanced view of
Operation Iraqi Freedom. He voted for the war resolution but
specified a litany of conditions the Bush administration must meet
before he would support combat, then proceeded to vote against
funding troops already in harm's way – then claimed he had always
supported the president when Saddam Hussein was captured. The grant
recipients of the Tides Foundation, to which Kerry's wife has
steered millions of dollars in "charitable" funds, understand no
such nuance.

Tides established the Iraq Peace Fund and the Peace Strategies Fund
to fund the antiwar movement. These projects fueled such hysterical
protest organizations as MoveOn.org, the website that recently
featured two separate commercials portraying George W. Bush as Adolf
Hitler. (Howard Dean, not Kerry, won MoveOn.org's "virtual
primary.")

The antiwar movement often boasted that MoveOn.org and the radical
website Indymedia provided them "alternate media coverage."
Indymedia, an enormous news and events bulletin board with local
pages in most of the world's major cities, provided a vital link for
radical activists often with violent agendas to coordinate their
protests. Indymedia received $376,000 from the Tides Foundation.

The Institute for Global Communications is another leftist
communications facilitator that received Tides grant money. IGC,
which during the 1990s was the leading provider of web technology to
the radical Left, links to "recommended sites" such as the War
Resisters League (a group whose purpose is enabling peaceniks to
refuse to pay taxes) and the leftist American Friends Service
Committee. Most disturbing is the link to Ramsey Clark's
International Action Center, which has supported North Korean
strongman Kim Jong-Il. The IAC is the force behind International
ANSWER, which sponsored the major antiwar (and anti-Bush) rallies
before the invasion of Iraq. When ANSWER was outed as a Communist
organization, United for Peace and Justice, headed by longtime
Communist Party member Leslie Cagan was created as a "moderate"
alternative. UFPJ is also a Tides grant recipient.The Tides-
funded "A Better Way Project," which opposed war in Iraq, also
coordinated efforts of United for Peace and Justice and the Win
Without War Coalition. The celebrity-laden Win Without War
Coalition, along with the Bill Moyers-funded Florence and John
Schumann Foundation, ran full-page ads in the New York Times
opposing the War on Terrorism. This will not be the last overlapping
of far-Left causes.

The Islamist Front

Immediately after 9/11, Tides formed a "9/11 Fund" to advocate
a "peaceful national response" to the opening salvos of war....The
Foundation replaced the 9/11 Fund with the "Democratic Justice
Fund," which was established with the aid of George Soros' Open
Society Institute. (Currency speculator and pro-drug advocate Soros
is, like Teresa Heinz Kerry, a major contributor to Tides, having
donated more than $7 million.) The Democratic Justice Fund seeks to
ease restrictions on Muslim immigration to the United States,
particularly from countries designated by the State Department
as "terrorist nations."

Tides has also given grant money to the Council for American Islamic
Relations. Ostensibly a "Muslim civil rights group," CAIR is in fact
one of the leading anti-anti-terrorism organizations within the
Wahhabi Lobby, with links to Hamas. CAIR regularly opposes and
demonizes American efforts to fight terrorism, claiming, for
instance, that Homeland Security measures are responsible for an
undocumented surge in "hate crimes."

CAIR officials have reason to fight Bush's anti-terrorism measures:
all too many CAIR officials are on the record supporting terrorism.
CAIR Executive Director Nihad Awad openly stated in 1994, "I am a
supporter of the Hamas movement." Community Affairs Director Bassem
K. Khafagi has been arrested for visa and bank fraud. Randall Royer,
a Communications Specialist and Civil Rights Coordinator at CAIR,
was arrested along with a group of Islamic radicals in Virginia for
allegedly planning jihad. CAIR has defended terrorist "charities"
shut down by the Bush administration. Every few months some CAIR
campus official is arrested for aiding and abetting terrorism.

The Legal Matrix

The Tides Foundation has funded a number of the pillars of the
radical legal establishment. Chief among these is the National
Lawyers Guild, which began as a Commnist front organization and is
proud of its lineage. At its recent convention last October, the
concluding speaker was Lynne Stewart, an indicted terrorist NLG
lawyer arrested for helping her client – convicted 1993 World Trade
Center bombing mastermind Sheikh Omar Abdel Rahman – communicate
with his terrorist cells in Egypt. In her speech, Stewart said she
and her NLG comrades were carrying on a proud tradition of their
forebears, past and present.

More recently, the NLG has endorsed the March 20 call to End
Colonial Occupation from Iraq to Palestine & Everywhere" organized
by International ANSWER.

Tides' Peace Strategies Fund has funneled money to the Center for
Constitutional Rights. The CCR was stablished by Sixties radical
William Kunstler, defender of the Chicago 8, and Arthur Kinoy. The
two also had plans to establish a new Communist Party. Executive
Director Ron Daniels has been honored by the Communist Party USA for
his work. Daniels also has a long and cordial relationship with
racist, anti-Semitic "poet laureate" Amiri Baraka. Since 9/11, CCR
has channeled its efforts into fighting every effective Homeland
Security measure. They have opposed increasing the government's
ability to wiretap Islamists suspected of plotting terrorism and
moaned the sequestering of terrorist detainees at Guantanamo Bay was
an unexcusable form of "racial profiling." CCR President Michael
Ratner has portrayed American soldiers as the offenders, guilty of
9/11 by their Middle East policy and guilty of keeping Islamist
killers "shackled, hooded and sedated during the 25 hour flight from
Afghanistan." CCR has also defended Lynne Stewart's "innocence" in
aiding Sheikh Rahman's Islamic Jihad...
remember that Heinz money has repeatedly found its way to the Earth
Island
Institute. On September 14, 2001, the Institute's website bore the
headline
"U.S. Responds to Terrorist Attacks with Self-Righteous Arrogance."
Ben Johnson is Managing Editor of FrontPage Magazine and author of
the book 57 Varieties of Radical Causes: Teresa Heinz Kerry's
Charitable Giving.
Source: http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=12187

From: WWW.AfricanCrisis.Org
They've had interviews with South Africans, and generally, there is a
majority (mostly non-white) who want Kerry to win. Though many whites
also want Kerry to win.

This is because our Government and media are biased against Bush and we
hear lots of anti-Bush propaganda.

The fact that South Africans want Kerry to win, is reason enough for me
to hold the opposite view.

Of course, the real reason I would prefer Bush to win is because I notice
how crazy the communists (both in South Africa and abroad), go at the
mere mention of Bush. That Terrorists and Communists hate Bush with such
a passion is enough of a sign that they see Bush as something of a
threat... even if Bush himself does not truly grasp what is going on.

Terrorists (and Communists - same thing virtually) want Kerry in because
"he's their man from Hanoi..." the Great Traitor... who will hand them
victory on a plate. Kerry will allow the communists to infiltrate the USA
further, and take over what's left... while letting the Muslims run
amuck... and letting Russia and China extend their grip on the world...
especially the Middle East...

The world has become socialist... and so they will love Kerry... because
they recognise their kin... even as he poses in Sheep's clothing.

The world has gone mad and insane in my opinion. That 50% of the US
population can even THINK of supporting Kerry... stuns me. Its an
indictment of democracy... It shows me these people aren't fit to have
the vote. I say Blacks in Africa shouldn't get the vote - but now I'm
starting to think many Whites in the Western world should be stripped of
their right to vote too!!! How can they vote for a man who betrayed his
own country; has negotiated with communists; has taken ORDERS FROM
COMMUNISTS (e.g. when he was in the Communist-directed "Peace
movement")... etc. He is a man who has no values - promises anything to
anyone and is all things to all people, all the time, even when those
things are diametrically opposite. He's the most ridiculous fool of a
politician to ever surface in the USA. His wife originates from
Mozambique and South Africa - where she has firm communist ties and
extreme leftist views. I have heard that she has funded terrorists and
all sorts of extremists. Kerry himself is no better. He should be lined
up and put on trial for treason if nothing else. Too bad nobody shoots
anyone for treason anymore because he definitely needs to be placed in
front of a firing squad and shot for what he did after Vietnam.

I look at him and spit on him. He's far worse than Clinton ever was.
People might as well be voting directly for PUTIN... its the same thing.


I hope Bush wins... but I'm not sure I have much faith in the world any
more... and my faith in the USA is going down all the time. It looks to
me as if America will trade away Israel and may yet allow itself to be
terrorised by a couple of crazy Arabs who really need to be put in their
place.

What a screwed up world we live in. Definitely its a world gone mad. Only
the Russians and Chinese can be laughing and enjoying what's happening.
Jan

From: WWW.AfricanCrisis.Org
I see on the Drudge Report that Kerry is slightly ahead on the exit
polls.

Let me tell you all something, if the American people elect Kerry, then I
will abandon all thoughts of seeing America ever saving this planet from
communism.

If the American people elect John Kerry, it will be a DISGRACE.
Jan

From: WWW.AfricanCrisis.Org
In a twist... South Africa sent 2 election monitors to the USA. I note
with fascination that a number of countries will be monitoring the US
election. How funny!! The USA has been running its elections for over 200
years... now some Third World Tin Pot nations want to teach Americans how
to do it.

How about us learning to count first? We only have 18 million voters, and
it takes us a good two weeks to count... meanwhile the Americans, with
their automated (and much more reliable systems)... count their ballots
within a day and know the result. Maybe we should be going to the USA to
learn how to count first...

I do suspect that the real reason we sent election monitors to the USA
was to really play our part, along with the rest of the Socialist world,
in trying to throw doubt on the integrity of the US election. Remember,
we sent election monitors to Zimbabwe where our election monitors managed
to see a Free and Fair election when everyone else said it was nothing of
the kind. I am dying to hear what our election monitors will say about
the USA? Can they in any way, twist the facts so as to throw some doubt
on Bush's win? Anything is possible.

I see on the Drudge Report that Bush has won. Excellent stuff. That
means: MORE WAR... Lovely... I'm happy. We can't just hand the bastards
on the left victory and surrender on a plate.
Jan

From: WWW.AfricanCrisis.Org
Putin, Mandela, Mbeki, Mugabe, Arafat, Castro and the rest of the world's
Communist/Terrorist scum-bags must be really angry this morning. That
damned man Bush has won again... Anything that angers them makes me
happy!!! VERY HAPPY!!!

This Bush win is almost like a declaration of World War III.

Wonderful! The terrorists were holding back with their mega terror... in
case the ultimate Communist Infiltrators: John Kerry and Wife managed to
get in. Putin and his lads had to hang back on the mega terror on US soil
because Kerry would have tried to pretend that Terror was just a Bush
trick which did not need any military response. Kerry and the
Terrorist/Communist Cabal would have tried to pretend that 9/11 and
Terror were just figments of Bush's imagination... they would
conveniently have rewritten history to convince everyone that the last 4
years we've all just been imagining things.

So the terrorists probably held back with their attacks on US soil to
help Kerry... Now it will all have to RESUME. Yep!! The naughty American
Conservatives will have to be punished for choosing Bush.

I like Bush... not because he does all that much... (he's far too soft in
my opinion)... but because the Commies and Terrorists HATE HIM SO MUCH.

These days, there's a group of people: US Liberals=Terrorists=Communists
- who work together. US Liberals, as usual, are working with Terrorists,
trying so hard to hand them victory on a plate. Of course, Liberals
pretend to be squeaky clean... "Oh we don't support terrorism"... but yes
they DO. What Liberals don't seem to realise is that Terrorists and
Communists SUPPORT THEM!!! Why? Because the Liberals will hand the
Terrorists and Communists Victory on a Plate.

And of course Kerry, with Communist Credentials coming out of his ears...
will be happy to follow THE PARTY LINE in the White House...

No doubt the Communists and Terrorists were holding their collective
breaths, hoping to God that Americans are stupid enough to vote their man
in... and so they did all they could to help him...

I was holding my breath too. I was wondering if the stupid in America
were going to outnumber the rest. It was close.

A victory for Kerry would have been a victory for the cowardly who would
hand over a mighty nation to a few slime bags with Terrorist/Communist
connections.

Osama Bin Laden (read Putin), has said that naughty Americans will get
their butts kicked if they vote for Bush. Many South Africans this
morning will be angry with you Americans... (except for a few whites like
me).

I'm happy... Bush isn't the greatest, but to quote a friend of mine "He
has some sense of self-defence"... and that's what I'm banking on,
because it means the Terrorists and Communists couldn't bluff their way
back into the White House... it means... grabbing more infidels,
sharpening their knives and starting to cut off more people's heads. A
Bush Victory is gonna condemn more Palestinians to death... I mean
they'll have to strap on all those bomb belts again and blow up more
Israelis. It means they will die in a hail of Israeli bullets too...
because Bush will keep Israel alive just a little bit longer than Kerry
would. It means more fighting in Iraq instead of SURRENDER and RETREAT as
Kerry would have preferred.

So, yippee, today the terrorists are getting up, and having to start
making bombs again, dusting off old plans of how to kill more Americans,
Jews and Westerners. Bummer for them!!

But I'm very happy... It means lots more war ahead... lots and lots and
LOTS in the next few years... the Middle East will burn... and maybe it
will start spreading... into World War III.

The main reason I am happy is because it means, the little bit of Free
World that's left (consisting solely of the USA+Israel), still remains
unconquered, and above all, they won't be HANDING THE ENEMY VICTORY ON A
PLATE!!!

As a friend of mine said, maybe, Bush even gets to see the light at some
point and will lob a few nuclear bombs Putin's way!! (Don't tease me now
and get me all excited and then disappoint me later!!!).

MORE BUSH=MORE RESISTANCE.
THAT MAKES MY DAY!!!!
Jan

From: WWW.AfricanCrisis.Org
I know many people, including myself are interested in prophecies. I
might as well mention a rather secret war prophecy I came across some
years ago.

In 1995, there was a magazine article about a Professor Lemmer, who had 7
university degrees and who also happened to be psychic. He was writing a
book wherein he was trying to get to the scientific roots of psychic
matters. Since he experienced visions and strange things, he tried to
make his own deductions about what was happening.

A magazine article was written about him. I contacted him. The magazine
article mentioned that when he was a kid, he had foreseen World War II
and the single-winged planes in visions he had many years before these
things existed.

It mentioned, interestingly, that he foresaw a tremendous war in South
Africa. When I contacted him in 1995... he did not want to discuss this
with me.

I lost contact with him... in the meantime... he wrote a book in
Afrikaans (which was never published), and then he passed away. Round
about 1999, I went in search of him again... I found his wife had moved
and finally I spent an evening chatting to her. She told me many strange
things about him - which were all very fascinating.

But I was interested in the war prophecy about South Africa. In his
manuscript, which she gave me a copy of, he did not mention it. But she
did tell me that she remembered the night when he had this very realistic
dream - which like many other dreams he had had (which came true) - he
took very seriously.

She said he woke up in a cold sweat saying he had seen the most terrible
thing. He did not want to say exactly what he saw. He said he saw fire
and war all over South Africa. It freaked him out... and he never wrote
about it, nor would he tell me exactly what he saw. But it must have been
really bad.

As I see George Bush's re-election, and what it means in terms of much
more war to come in the Middle East... and maybe even a future world
war... the Professor's terrible vision comes to mind... and I can't help
wondering if it will yet occur?

The Professor's book has never been published. But a friend of mine in
the USA has translated it from Afrikaans to English.

Jan

Some similarities, yes, but also very important differences: indeed. we see foundational differences of principle, today.  Let's never forget it.  We are not all Democrats, nor all Republicans.  We are Americans of the minds and spirits Thomas Jefferson spoke to. 

 

Stephen

 

" .... But every difference of opinion is not a difference of principle. We have called by different names brethren of the same principle. We are all Republicans, we are all Federalists ... " -- Thomas Jefferson, Wednesday, March 4, 1801

---

Thomas Jefferson First Inaugural Address In the Washington, D.C. Wednesday, March 4, 1801     Chief Justice John Marshall administered the first executive oath of office ever taken in the new federal city in the new Senate Chamber (now the Old Supreme Court Chamber) of the partially built Capitol building. The outcome of the election of 1800 had been in doubt until late February because Thomas Jefferson and Aaron Burr, the two leading candidates, each had received 73 electoral votes.   Consequently, the House of Representatives met in a special session to resolve the impasse, pursuant to the terms spelled out in the Constitution. After 30 hours of debate and balloting, Mr. Jefferson emerged as the President and Mr. Burr the Vice President. President John Adams, who had run unsuccessfully for a second term, left Washington on the day of the inauguration without attending the ceremony.

Friends and Fellow-Citizens:

 CALLED upon to undertake the duties of the first executive office of our country, I avail myself of the presence of that portion of my fellow-citizens which is here assembled to express my grateful thanks for the favor with which they have been pleased to look toward me, to declare a sincere consciousness that the task is above my talents, and that I approach it with those anxious and awful presentiments which the greatness of the charge and the weakness of my powers so justly inspire.

A rising nation, spread over a wide and fruitful land, traversing all the seas with the rich productions of their industry, engaged in commerce with nations who feel power and forget right, advancing rapidly to destinies beyond the reach of mortal eye—when I contemplate these transcendent objects, and see the honor, the happiness, and the hopes of this beloved country committed to the issue, and the auspices of this day, I shrink from the contemplation, and humble myself before the magnitude of the undertaking.

Utterly, indeed, should I despair did not the presence of many whom I here see remind me that in the other high authorities provided by our Constitution I shall find resources of wisdom, of virtue, and of zeal on which to rely under all difficulties.

To you, then, gentlemen, who are charged with the sovereign functions of legislation, and to those associated with you, I look with encouragement for that guidance and support which may enable us to steer with safety the vessel in which we are all embarked amidst the conflicting elements of a troubled world.

During the contest of opinion through which we have passed the animation of discussions and of exertions has sometimes worn an aspect which might impose on strangers unused to think freely and to speak and to write what they think; but this being now decided by the voice of the nation, announced according to the rules of the Constitution, all will, of course, arrange themselves under the will of the law, and unite in common efforts for the common good.

All, too, will bear in mind this sacred principle, that though the will of the majority is in all cases to prevail, that will to be rightful must be reasonable; that the minority possess their equal rights, which equal law must protect, and to violate would be oppression.

Let us, then, fellow-citizens, unite with one heart and one mind.

Let us restore to social intercourse that harmony and affection without which liberty and even life itself are but dreary things. And let us reflect that, having banished from our land that religious intolerance under which mankind so long bled and suffered, we have yet gained little if we countenance a political intolerance as despotic, as wicked, and capable of as bitter and bloody persecutions.

During the throes and convulsions of the ancient world, during the agonizing spasms of infuriated man, seeking through blood and slaughter his long-lost liberty, it was not wonderful that the agitation of the billows should reach even this distant and peaceful shore; that this should be more felt and feared by some and less by others, and should divide opinions as to measures of safety.

But every difference of opinion is not a difference of principle.

We have called by different names brethren of the same principle.

We are all Republicans, we are all Federalists.

If there be any among us who would wish to dissolve this Union or to change its republican form, let them stand undisturbed as monuments of the safety with which error of opinion may be tolerated where reason is left free to combat it.

I know, indeed, that some honest men fear that a republican government can not be strong, that this Government is not strong enough; but would the honest patriot, in the full tide of successful experiment, abandon a government which has so far kept us free and firm on the theoretic and visionary fear that this Government, the world's best hope, may by possibility want energy to preserve itself?

I trust not. I believe this, on the contrary, the strongest Government on earth. I believe it the only one where every man, at the call of the law, would fly to the standard of the law, and would meet invasions of the public order as his own personal concern. Sometimes it is said that man can not be trusted with the government of himself. Can he, then, be trusted with the government of others? Or have we found angels in the forms of kings to govern him? Let history answer this question.2

 Let us, then, with courage and confidence pursue our own Federal and Republican principles, our attachment to union and representative government. Kindly separated by nature and a wide ocean from the exterminating havoc of one quarter of the globe; too high-minded to endure the degradations of the others; possessing a chosen country, with room enough for our descendants to the thousandth and thousandth generation; entertaining a due sense of our equal right to the use of our own faculties, to the acquisitions of our own industry, to honor and confidence from our fellow-citizens, resulting not from birth, but from our actions and their sense of them; enlightened by a benign religion, professed, indeed, and practiced in various forms, yet all of them inculcating honesty, truth, temperance, gratitude, and the love of man; acknowledging and adoring an overruling Providence, which by all its dispensations proves that it delights in the happiness of man here and his greater happiness hereafter—with all these blessings, what more is necessary to make us a happy and a prosperous people?

Still one thing more, fellow-citizens—a wise and frugal Government, which shall restrain men from injuring one another, shall leave them otherwise free to regulate their own pursuits of industry and improvement, and shall not take from the mouth of labor the bread it has earned. This is the sum of good government, and this is necessary to close the circle of our felicities.3

 About to enter, fellow-citizens, on the exercise of duties which comprehend everything dear and valuable to you, it is proper you should understand what I deem the essential principles of our Government, and consequently those which ought to shape its Administration. I will compress them within the narrowest compass they will bear, stating the general principle, but not all its limitations.

Equal and exact justice to all men, of whatever state or persuasion, religious or political; peace, commerce, and honest friendship with all nations, entangling alliances with none; the support of the State governments in all their rights, as the most competent administrations for our domestic concerns and the surest bulwarks against anti-republican tendencies; the preservation of the General Government in its whole constitutional vigor, as the sheet anchor of our peace at home and safety abroad; a jealous care of the right of election by the people—a mild and safe corrective of abuses which are lopped by the sword of revolution where peaceable remedies are unprovided; absolute acquiescence in the decisions of the majority, the vital principle of republics, from which is no appeal but to force, the vital principle and immediate parent of despotism; a well disciplined militia, our best reliance in peace and for the first moments of war, till regulars may relieve them; the supremacy of the civil over the military authority; economy in the public expense, that labor may be lightly burthened; the honest payment of our debts and sacred preservation of the public faith; encouragement of agriculture, and of commerce as its handmaid; the diffusion of information and arraignment of all abuses at the bar of the public reason; freedom of religion; freedom of the press, and freedom of person under the protection of the habeas corpus, and trial by juries impartially selected.

These principles form the bright constellation which has gone before us and guided our steps through an age of revolution and reformation.

The wisdom of our sages and blood of our heroes have been devoted to their attainment. They should be the creed of our political faith, the text of civic instruction, the touchstone by which to try the services of those we trust; and should we wander from them in moments of error or of alarm, let us hasten to retrace our steps and to regain the road which alone leads to peace, liberty, and safety.4

 I repair, then, fellow-citizens, to the post you have assigned me. With experience enough in subordinate offices to have seen the difficulties of this the greatest of all, I have learnt to expect that it will rarely fall to the lot of imperfect man to retire from this station with the reputation and the favor which bring him into it. Without pretensions to that high confidence you reposed in our first and greatest revolutionary character, whose preeminent services had entitled him to the first place in his country's love and destined for him the fairest page in the volume of faithful history, I ask so much confidence only as may give firmness and effect to the legal administration of your affairs. I shall often go wrong through defect of judgment.

When right, I shall often be thought wrong by those whose positions will not command a view of the whole ground. I ask your indulgence for my own errors, which will never be intentional, and your support against the errors of others, who may condemn what they would not if seen in all its parts. The approbation implied by your suffrage is a great consolation to me for the past, and my future solicitude will be to retain the good opinion of those who have bestowed it in advance, to conciliate that of others by doing them all the good in my power, and to be instrumental to the happiness and freedom of all.

Relying, then, on the patronage of your good will, I advance with obedience to the work, ready to retire from it whenever you become sensible how much better choice it is in your power to make. And may that Infinite Power which rules the destinies of the universe lead our councils to what is best, and give them a favorable issue for your peace and prosperity.

---

TITLE: Inaugural addresses of the presidents of the United States: from George Washington to George W. Bush.

EDITION: Bicentennial ed.

SERIES: Senate document (United States. Congress. Senate); 101–10.

PUBLISHED: Washington, D.C.: U.S. G.P.O.: for sale by the Supt. of Docs., U.S. G.P.O., 1989.

PHYSICAL DETAILS: viii, 350 p.: ill.; 24 cm.

OTHER AUTHORS: United States. Congress. Joint Congressional Committee on Inaugural Ceremonies.

ISBN: 1-58734-025-9.

NOTES: “101st Congress, 1st session.” “Joint Congressional Committee on Inaugural Ceremonies”—T.p. verso. Bill Clinton and George W. Bush inaugurals appended.

CITATION: Inaugural Addresses of the Presidents of the United States. Washington, D.C.: U.S. G.P.O.: for sale by the Supt. of Docs., U.S. G.P.O., 1989; Bartleby.com, 2001. www.bartleby.com/124/. [Date of Printout].

ON-LINE ED.: First published October 1993; published January 2001 by Bartleby.com; © Copyright Bartleby.com, Inc. (Terms of Use). 
 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Terms of Use · © 2004 Bartleby.com 

 

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.782 / Virus Database: 528 - Release Date: 10/22/04

Finally. After over two years of a seemingly endless campaign, President Bush was re-elected on Tuesday night with a decisive mandate. He braved cruel attacks on his policies and his patriotism to get to this point. He handled those disreputable charges with honor. He overcame a massive media onslaught designed to elect John Kerry president. This election is a repudiation of the Michael Moore crowd, the MoveOn.orgs, the Deaniacs and the new-look Al Gore. This election is a ringing endorsement for traditional values, peace through strength, and American optimism.

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.782 / Virus Database: 528 - Release Date: 10/22/04