Skip to search.

Breaking News Visit Yahoo! News for the latest.

×Close this window

oldright · A BATR Yahoo Group

The Yahoo! Groups Product Blog

Check it out!

Group Information

  • Members: 118
  • Category: Politics
  • Founded: Sep 15, 2003
  • Language: English
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Real people. Real stories. See how Yahoo! Groups impacts members worldwide.

Messages

Advanced
Messages Help
Messages 17479 - 17508 of 18440   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Messages: Show Message Summaries Sort by Date ^  
#17479 From: Supreme Law Firm <paulandrewmitchell2004@...>
Date: Wed Feb 1, 2012 4:49 pm
Subject: "The Tragic Reality of the World's Biggest Corrupt Legal System," by Journalist Les Sachs
paulandrewmi...
Send Email Send Email
 
----- Forwarded Message -----
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell <supremelawfirm@...>
Sent: Wednesday, February 1, 2012 8:40 AM
Subject: "The Tragic Reality of the World's Biggest Corrupt Legal System," by Journalist Les Sachs

See also:

http://www.supremelaw.org/authors/sachs/Crooked.Judges.Lawyers.and.Corporate.Power.htm

http://www.supremelaw.org/authors/sachs/corrupt.system.htm



The Tragic Reality of the World's
Biggest Corrupt Legal System 
By Journalist Les Sachs  (Dr-Les-Sachs@...) 
 
The following is an excerpt by an anti-corruption journalist and former US citizen who received political asylum in Europe. From his refuge in Europe, this author wrote a free online resource book for victims, the 'FAQ on US Judicial and Legal Corruption.'  Dr Les Sachs names U.S. judges as 'criminals and terrorists' involved in threats of political murder. Below are excerpts from just one of his articles.
 
 
Excerpts: 
 
The tragic reality of the world's biggest corrupt legal system
 
America's rigged courts, bribed judges, fake and phony trials, extortion by lawyers, and over 2.2 million prisoners in the USA gulag.
 
Right now, about 1 out of every 45 working age males in the US are BEHIND BARS inside the US empire - Many of those millions of US prisoners are innocent.
 
The corrupt USA legal system, is a danger to every traveler, visitor, and guest worker from overseas, and to every individual who takes the risky step of entering upon American territory.
 
The reality is that the United States of America has the most dishonest, dangerous and crooked legal system of any developed nation. Legal corruption is covering America like a blanket.
 
The corruption of the USA legal system is well-known, but also well-hidden, by the news services of America's corporate-owned media.  
America has the largest prison gulag in the entire world - The starting point for understanding anything about the USA, is to digest the fact that just this one country, the United States of America, has twenty-five percent of ALL of the prisoners in the entire world.
 
More than 2.2 million prisoners - more than 1 out of every 150 people in America - are behind bars in the American gulag. American "justice" is especially focused on jailing people who US government thinks might organize into opposition to the government.
 
No one imprisons people as casually as America, tossing innocent people into prison. The USA jailing of more than 2 million people is also a revival of slavery and slave labor. The expanding system of USA prison slave labor is not only a major source of business profit, but also a wedge to drive down the wages of workers outside the prison walls.
 
This culture of mass prisons and slave labor is sold to US citizens by creating a psychology of fear. This climate of fear is nourished in the USA by both the media and the government, who work together with the judges and lawyers to maintain the whole crooked game.
 
Before you set foot in America, you should have a clear picture of the terror of America's legal system - the judges and lawyers and money and bribery, that have made this system of fear so pervasive.
 
The situation is so bad, that a social explosion is beginning inside America. You can read some news stories - about people murdering judges, or attacking the families of judges, or people setting fire to courthouses in the USA - and see the pattern that is emerging, even though the news media are afraid to connect the dots and suggest what might be behind all these events.
 
American prisons are often horrible, with lots of torment of prisoners, like you would expect in some petty dictatorship. Rape and beatings are common, and there is little help for abused inmates. In addition to the many official USA executions, numerous people are also illegally killed in jail cells, "mysteriously" found hanged or stabbed to death.
 
In the regular functioning of the USA courts, America's domestic lawyers and judges, threaten people with illegal jailing, and rape, torture and murder in jail.
 
Theoretically, torture and abuse is totally outlawed by America's Constitution, but some of the nice words in America's Constitution hold little power anymore, despite how often people quote them.
 
America's Bill of Rights and Constitution are nearly dead, not just because the judges will no longer enforce them, but even more because America's lawyers will not even fight for them. The two American "political parties" are not fighting for them, either, and America's news media are also very passive. This means that America's legal system has become largely a tool of government terror, and of bribery for the rich and the powerful.
 
The words of the law don't protect you in the USA, because American judges and lawyers have no scruples about bending them to mean the opposite of what they say.
 
America's lawyers are controlled by the judges, and don't really work for you - that's why they sell you out to the government, or to the big companies that pay bribes.
 
Even if you are paying an American lawyer huge amounts of money, he or she doesn't really work for you, and may sell you down the river to the jailhouse.
 
American lawyers are directly under the thumb of the judges and the government. Lawyers, just like any other victim, can be instantly jailed by an American judge on flimsy pretexts, and American lawyers can be quickly stripped of their right to practice law. Lawyers who try to fight the system can find themselves dis-barred, criminally charged and jailed.
 
American lawyers are afraid to do things in court, that the judges don't want them to do. America's nearly 1 million lawyers, are almost totally under the control of a few thousand judges, with their entrenched culture of bribery and miscarriage of justice.
 
That means that any time you hire an American lawyer, he already is in a conflict of interest. He has to make the judge happy first. And if the judge wants to make the government happy, or make some corporation happy who is paying a big bribe, then guess what? You are destroyed. It doesn't matter what you paid the lawyer. He works for the judge, first and foremost.
 
People accused of serious crimes have the "right" to a lawyer, but this may only provide a crooked lawyer who is stage-managing the victim to help the government and prosecutors. If the lawyer does not betray the victim to help the government, he can be put out of work.
 
This legal fraud is the core of the danger to those who visit America. A lawyer who is "representing" you in the USA, whether the government is paying him, or even if you are paying him yourself, may just be a stooge who is helping the prosecutors to put you in jail, even though you are innocent.
 
The judges of America gave every accused criminal the "right" to a lawyer, because it helps stage-manage the victim, with a lawyer who has to do things the judge's way. In America, such government-appointed lawyers are the means by which hundreds of thousands of poor people are railroaded into prison.
 
Most American court cases never go to trial, never see a jury; it is the job of the victim's lawyer to "sell the deal" that the judge has decided will happen, or else. This is how people accept a "plea bargain" so they accept going to jail for 3 years even though they are innocent, instead of going to trial before a jury: The victim is warned: you accept a "bargain" of a few years in jail, or you go to jail the rest of your life.
 
Often, both "sides" of lawyers are actually working together for the government, or for the big corporation or rich person who is bribing the judge.
 
In the American legal system, you essentially have no recourse against wrongdoing by your own lawyer. A lawyer can sell you out, betray you, steal your money, engage in malpractice, help out the other side, hide the evidence that proved you were right, or commit felony crimes against you, and there is almost nothing you can do about it.
 
Part of the reason America has so much crime, even with more than 2.2 million people in prison, is because the people who actually committed the crimes were never arrested.
 
Any innocent person can get railroaded to death in America. 
 
Multi-millionnaires and big corporations, vs. everybody else
 
The only people who really can expect some fairness in American courts are multi-millionnaires and big corporations who pay political contributions and bribery money, and who protect the interests of other rich people. Nobody else really matters to American judges and lawyers.
 
There is a huge amount of bribery in America. Rich people pay huge amounts of money to law firms with connections, the lawyers walk around with a certain amount of cash in their jacket, and they pass it to the judges in their quiet moments together. Mostly all cash of course.
 
As an average person, there's no real way to out-bribe a big corporation, regardless of what your lawyer promised you. That's why big companies win most of the time.
 
Judges set up a trial in all sorts of ways, giving orders that all sorts of evidence be hidden from a jury, for example. The judge may declare, for example, that the evidence that proves you are innocent or right, will not be allowed at the trial.
 
Jury trials are actually very rare in America, unlike what you see in the movies. Most cases are "settled" through some deal or extortion or intimidation. If there is a jury trial, they tend to stack the jury with un-educated idiots who will tend to believe whatever lies they are told by the judge and the government.
 
Yes, there are "appeals" courts, but these are just more judges, who are usually friends with the lower court judge who originally sold you out.
 
Americans love to talk about "taking it all the way to the Supreme Court!", but this is a nearly empty hope for real people. The U.S. Supreme Court simply refuses to consider most cases that are presented to it.
 
If you are a little helpless nobody, the appeals judges often barely reply to you, and sometimes don't reply at all. Sometimes people have been strapped to a table and given the lethal poison and put to death in America, with the victim's appeal never even answered by the judges. 
 
The Hollywood image, versus the grim reality
 
Around the world, people derive an image of America, and its legal system, from these fictional creations on film. America's propaganda about having "the greatest legal system in the world" is one of those phony stories that Hollywood is helping to sell.
 
In the Hollywood version, the judges in American courts are like kind uncles, smiling and being wise and calmly dispensing justice. But in reality, American judges sometimes scream at people like disturbed perverts, and show off their bribed corruption right there in the courtroom.
 
In the Hollywood version, there are brave lawyers who will fight for your rights, to win justice for you in the American courts. In reality, you can't find an American lawyer brave enough to fight judicial corruption, even if you are innocent and the judge's friends have threatened to murder you, or threatened to send you to jail for the rest of your life.
 
In the Hollywood version, the average person is also helped by the "brave investigative reporter" at some newspaper or television station, who shows great courage in exposing the truth, and bringing powerful wrongdoing to face justice. However, the brave "investigative reporter" in America is now as fictional and non-existent as the "brave lawyer" who will fight for your rights.
 
In America today, reporters are little timid people who are afraid of getting fired, and who almost never write a story on government corruption, unless some other part of the government is officially investigating or prosecuting. That goes triple when judges or lawyers are involved. The owners of the newspapers and television stations are afraid of revenge by the judges if they have to go to court. 
 
No recourse against crime and fraud by judges and lawyers in America
 
In reality, there is almost nothing you can do against misconduct, and even open felony crime, committed against you by American judges and lawyers. All of the official complaint procedures you find on the internet, or at the courthouse or in the law books, turn out to be a joke, a farce and a fraud.
 
Complaints about lawyers in America, usually go to the "Bar", which is itself run by the judges who are involved in bribery with the lawyers. And complaints about judges go to other judges, their friends.
 
Nearly all the complaints about lawyers and judges - tens of thousands of them - are kept secret. Nearly all are dismissed or ignored. They are generally only used if the judges or politicians want to specially destroy someone. Otherwise, criminal acts by lawyers and judges get a smiling cover-up.
 
The police and FBI almost certainly will not help you, either. They all know the bribery game, and they rely on the same crooked judges to help send innocent people to prison.
 
The newspapers and television and media won't help you. They hear stories like yours all the time. The USA media are afraid to help you, afraid of revenge if they expose judicial corruption.
 
America's politicians will not help you.  You can also forget about most of America's human rights and civil liberties groups. Many are just money-raising groups which don't help victims. They are all scared of the legal system, too.
 
The growing American nightmare
 
It can't go on like this forever, but it may get a lot worse first. Perhaps, it will not be until after America has had a major economic or social cataclysm, that the big American machine of legal corruption finally comes to be reformed, after a complete revolution in American life has swept away the old order.
 
American lawyers have become both the mafia and the Gestapo of American life.
 
American freedom is already largely lost. Americans who imagine they are still "free" are the ones who have not yet seen the lawyers and judges who smirk and laugh as they deny victims the most basic human rights. The truth is that, inside America, a nightmare has begun.
 
 
The author of the above, Dr Les Sachs, can be reached in Europe at Dr-Les-Sachs(at)Laposte.net.
 
For the complete original article, or to access Dr Sachs free online book, the FAQ on US Judicial & Legal corruption, www(dot)tinyurl(dot)com/5f9v6m   There you will also find a link to the free online FAQ on US Judicial and Legal Corruption.

--




#17480 From: Supreme Law Firm <paulandrewmitchell2004@...>
Date: Wed Feb 1, 2012 4:54 pm
Subject: Another New Route to Attack the Usurper: "Wire Fraud in the Land of Obama"
paulandrewmi...
Send Email Send Email
 
Obama was formally charged with wire fraud here:

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/obama/third.circuit/vcc.htm

(7)     commission of a felony by having devised or intended to devise a scheme or artifice to defraud and to obtain money or property by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations or promises, by transmitting and causing to be transmitted by means of wire, radio or television communications in interstate or foreign commerce, writings, signs, signals, pictures or sounds for the purpose of executing such scheme or artifice, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1343 (one or more counts);

[end excerpt]

Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964(a)
http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/agency/private.attorney.general.htm
Criminal Investigator and Federal Witness: 18 U.S.C. 1510, 1512-13
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.policy.htm (Support Policy)
http://www.supremelaw.org/guidelines.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.guidelines.htm (Policy + Guidelines)

All Rights Reserved without Prejudice



----- Forwarded Message -----
From: "jonathonjoseph@..." <jonathonjoseph@...>
Sent: Wednesday, February 1, 2012 7:10 AM
Subject: Fwd: [ctrl] Another New Route to Attack the Usurper

 
 

From: nyknak@...
Reply-to: ctrl@yahoogroups.com
To: Undisclosed-Recipient:;
Sent: 1/31/2012 7:44:15 P.M. Central Standard Time
Subj: [ctrl] Another New Route to Attack the Usurper
 
 

Another New Route to Attack the Usurper George M.  obamaballotchallenge.com

http://obamaballotchallenge.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Wire-Fraud-e1328057588867.jpg

We’ve tried many ways to stop the illegal “President.”  The ballot challenge route has real possibilities, with dozens of complaints now filed and more on the way. An action in California seeks to cut off his fundraising. Now, Presidential candidate Montgomery Blair Sibley is bringing an action based upon Obama committing fraud by wire.  Maybe this will prompt another avalanche of complaints.

Wire Fraud in the Land of Obama

Dr Kate writes in her blog:
Though several individuals have requested state police and/or the F.B.I. to investigate Obama’s putative COLBs, this is the first instance where an individual has invoked 18 U.S.C. §3332 to removed the matter from the discretion of the politically-influenced Department of Justice. Instead, Sibley is taking the allegations of Obama’s wire fraud directly to a federal Grand Jury which has the unfettered power to indict Obama if it finds “there is sufficient evidence of probable cause to justify bringing the accused to trial.”
Read the story ….

Wire Fraud in the Land of Obama January 31, 2012  drkate

Title 18 U.S.C. § 1343 provides, in part:
Whoever, having devised or intending to devise any scheme or artifice to defraud, or for obtaining money or property by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, or promises, transmits or causes to be transmitted by means of wire, radio, or television communication in interstate or foreign commerce, any writings, signs, signals, pictures, or sounds for the purpose of executing such scheme or artifice, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both.
Write-in Presidential candidate Montgomery Blair Sibley asserts that by knowingly submitting a forged  certificate of live birth and ‘long form birth certificate’ on line to the American public,
the “scheme” that President Obama appears to have intended is to obtain a job that he is not eligible to hold given his lack of “natural born Citizen” status. See, e.g., United States v. Granberry, 908 F.2d 278, 279 (8th Cir. 1990)
Initially, it is well-settled that the “use of the Internet for transmission of images or messages satisfies the requirement of interstate commerce.” See, e.g., United States v. Carroll, 105 F.3d 740, 742 (1st Cir. 1997). Moreover, to seek to obtain public money – here the salary of the President of the United States – has been recognized as satisfying the “money” element of §1343. See, e.g., Pasquantino v. United States, 544 U.S. 349, 356-57 (2005) (recognizing that money in the public treasury is the government’s “money” for purposes of the mail fraud statute.)
Candidate Sibley submitted a  certified petition for Writs Quo Warranto and Mandamus to  the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, requesting a jury trial,  setting forth outcomes (a) that Obama be ousted from office and/or prevented from being placed on the ballot for the 2012 presidential election, (b) a directive to the U.S. Attorney to comply with 18 U.S.C. § 3332 and reveal to the Grand Jury the alleged offense of Obama, with the right of Sibley to inform in writing each and every one of the jurors of the offenses of Obama and other criminal acts of federal actors in the District of Columbia.
As with other cases of Quo Warranto  seeking to compel proof of natural born citizenship, the politically-influenced Department of Justice has refused to forward any case or respond to it, just like Jablonski’s  contemptuous and ill-fated attempt to go around the judiciary to quash any action against Obama.
However, Candidate Sibley will not go away quietly, and in a press release issued January 31, 2012 takes the following action:
WASHINGTON D.C. – Coming on the heels of the sworn testimony taken in the Georgia Administrative Law hearing at which expert witnesses testified under oath as to the indications of forgery in Barack Obama’s putative certificates of live birth, POTUS Write-In Candidate Montgomery Blair Sibley has this day amended his Quo Warranto lawsuit pending in the US. District Court for the District of Columbia to demand that the Court enforce 18 U.S.C. §3332.That section requires, upon request of a citizen, that the United States Attorney present information concerning such an alleged offense to the grand jury.
On January 12, 2012, Sibley made such a request. In so much as the United States Attorney has refused to acknowledge the request, Sibley has moved for a writ of mandamus from the Court to compel U.S. Attorney Machen, Jr., to comply with §3332.
Though several individuals have requested state police and/or the F.B.I. to investigate Obama’s putative COLBs, this is the first instance where an individual has invoked 18 U.S.C. §3332 to removed the matter from the discretion of the politically-influenced Department of Justice. Instead, Sibley is taking the allegations of Obama’s wire fraud directly to a federal Grand Jury which has the unfettered power to indict Obama if it finds “there is sufficient evidence of probable cause to justify bringing the accused to trial.”
~snip~
Citing not only the evidence attached to the First Amended Complaint, Sibley also now has required the assigned Judge – John D. Bates – to take judicial notice of the proceedings in the Georgia Administrative Law matter In that Georgia case, two expert document examiners testified under oath on January 27, 2012, that the certificates of live birth released by Obama appear to be forgeries.
The ball is now in the Court of the Honorable John D. Bates who must decide whether to enforce the law or allow the questions of: (i) Obama’s eligibility to be President and (ii) his alleged criminal behavior to be shielded from determination by his judicial inaction on these questions.
The battery of lawyers Obama must hire now have to fight fires on all fronts, including the ballot challenges being taken in six (6) more states against Obama, are costing taxpayers and Obama a fortune…the ill-gotten gains of Obama’s entire life of lies.
http://www.inmagine.com/izs016/izs016383-photo
Obama leads Dems over a waterfall
Lying, forgery, fraud by mouth, paper or wire– it’s all still fraud
http://obamaballotchallenge.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/obama-fraud.jpg
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Only a natural born citizen can legally be President of the USA.  ”Obama” is not either. See: http://www.art2superpac.com/issues.html
OBAMA ELIGIBILITY CHALLENGES SPREAD TO 6 STATES

Biased? Paid Media Partners Praise Vaccine, GMO Programs Led by Bill Gates When Does Sponsored Positive, Uncritical Coverage of Controversial Global Medical, Food Programs Become a Conflict of Interest?  Aaron Dykes  Infowars.com  January 31, 2012

Reports commonly say Bill Gates– through his philanthropic foundation work– is ‘saving lives’ and ‘feeding the world’s poor.’
Biased? Paid Media Partners Praise Vaccine, GMO Programs Led by Bill Gates media gates haloBut there’s no mistaking the genocidal undertones. Hundreds of millions if not billions are living on the edge of starvation at the start of the 21st Century, while a new era of GMO-proliferation and Big Agra domination pose other grave threats– both economic and vital. Thus, it is extremely important that we collectively decide on the best solutions for the future– or at least avoid the worst outcomes; it could prove far too costly in hindsight to pander to the wrong development.
So why has “the media” been so positively-glowing about Gates’ singular heavy-hand pushing GMO crops on the developing world (see AGRA partnership with Rockefeller Foundation and Monsanto) while vowing to lower population numbers through his global vaccination campaign (see GAVI alliance with Rockefeller Foundation), all while helping consolidate ownership in the food market now driving up prices (see global food security under Gates Foundation, Cargill and others)?
The simple answer is that many media voices are foundation funded– with grants and partnerships paid directly from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
The very journalistic outlets who should otherwise be holding Gates’ policies accountable with tough questions and volumes of scrutiny are instead financially-tied to his work.
Infowars Nightly News: Does Bill Gates Have a Conflict of Interest Problem?
For example, an ABC News article discussing the expansion of GMO drought resistant crops– aimed directly at Africa and the developing world– is published under a glowing title: “Bill Gates on Using His Money to Save Lives, Fixing U.S. Schools, Reflecting on Steve Jobs”. Mixed with disclosures that Gates holds 500,000 shares of stock in the world’s most controversial company, Monsanto, is a note at the bottom admitting that ABC News’ coverage has been sponsored in part by Gates, under the BE THE CHANGE: SAVE A LIFE program focused on health care in the poorest areas of the world:
http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/technology/2012/01/bill-gates-on-using-his-money-to-save-lives-and-fix-u-s-schools-and-steve-jobs/

Paid PR or Support for Unbiased News Reporting: ABC Says Bill Gates ‘Saving Lives’ in Story Sponsored by Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation

Without a doubt, disclosing their links is better than not doing so. But is it enough?
A big part of the problem is that Bill Gates, son of a top Planned Parenthood official, is in league with a group of wealthy eugencists working to reduce the world’s population. But instead of admitting the agenda he is working towards, much of his heavily-backed efforts are branded in “the media” under hopeful sounding terms like “global health,” “feeding the world’s poor,” “fighting disease” and other positive buzz terms. Look at the secret meeting of billionaires back in 2009, at which Bill Gates, David Rockefeller and numerous other celebrity elites gathered to coordinate population reduction-targeted programs.
Note the difference between ABC’s dull headline “Meeting of America’s Richest About ‘Need,’ Attendee Says” vs. the London Times eye-catching headline “Billionaire club in bid to curb overpopulation.”
Biased? Paid Media Partners Praise Vaccine, GMO Programs Led by Bill Gates billionaires overpopulation
But ABC News is far from the only media partner funded in part by Bill Gates.
The London Telegraph, too, has at least two blogs– on Global Development and Poverty Matters– subsidized by the Gates Foundation. Many stories, such as those on the rising prices of food, note the sponsorship of Gates, but the stories themselves fail to deal with the other interests owned by Gates– such as shares in Cargill and Monsanto– that may directly affect or influence the very food crisis at hand. Instead, the sponsorship logo paints a mainly positive impression of the foundation in the minds of readers.
Biased? Paid Media Partners Praise Vaccine, GMO Programs Led by Bill Gates telegraph food gatesfound

Two blogs at the London Telegraph are overtly subsidized by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundations, but the media outlet denies this potential conflict of interest affects their journalistic integrity.

To be fair, the same sponsored blog does post articles critical of Bill Gates, like this one: Why is the Gates foundation investing in GM giant Monsanto?. So why would Gates pay to support these reports if it could tarnish his image? Entities as large as the Gates Foundation know that they can never avoid all criticism; a better PR strategy, therefore, is to funnel one’s own critique through “friendly” outlets– a classic limited hangout.
Both the London Telegraph and ABC News claim that their relationship does not bias the reporting or add editorial pressure. However, if there was no benefit from such ties, lobbyists would have stopped taking politicians out for dinner & entertainment a long time ago.
Criticism is indeed dished out at Gates, but it is “balanced” with heroic, almost saint-like portrayals. The “media” has steered clear of covering the controversy over vaccine dangers (except to demonize whistleblowers), as well as studies that show GMO crops have correlation with cancer, organ failure and multi-generational sterility in lab rat studies?
In a CNN interview [no known sponsorship from the Gates Foundation] with Bill Gates, he was given softball questions heralding his savior status in Africa. Meanwhile, Gates was given freehand to smear Dr. Andrew Wakefield, who prominently raised questions about the possible link between vaccines and autism in a study. While on CNN, Gates called him a ‘fraud’ and overtly suggested that the doctor was biased from a financial interest– all while potentially costing the lives of vulnerable children:
Bill Gates: Vaccine Safety Skeptics Kill Children!
Wakefield has already initiated a lawsuit against journalist Brian Deer and the British Medical Journal for publishing lies, distortions and mischaracterization of his work. Yet Brian Deer has been criticized for not disclosing his own links. He appeared at a French conference attended by three MMR vaccine manufacturers (targeted by Wakefield’s research) as well as– you guessed it– the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Similarly, the producer of a BBC (Gates Foundation grant recipient) documentary largely attacking Dr. Wakefield also failed to disclose her links. According to the Age of Autism blog, producer for the BBC program, Alexandra Feachem, is the daughter of Sir Richard Feacham, a bonafide beneficiary of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and advocate for private-public partnerships in health.
But while opponents of Wakefield tried to target his alleged conflicts of interests, including financial, the Gates Foundation continues to give annual grants to dozens of media organizations and medical paper writing groups– from training to reporting and more. The Seattle Times disclosed in Feb. 2011 at least 45 media entities receiving money from the Gates Foundation. Some of the money is significant, other grants are paltry– but history shows that such financial support tends to sway influence (even without “buying” it).
Among these organizations are big name news media, including the BBC, NPR and AllAfricacom, as well as numerous university and global outlets, and of course, many press clubs and training grounds for tomorrow’s journalists. Further recipients include many centers that write or train for the writing of medical research and journal publication:
BILL & MELINDA GATES FOUNDATION
MEDIA-RELATED GRANT RECIPIENTS
:
AllAfrica Foundation
BBC World Service Trust
Brookings Institute
Columbia University
Crosscut Public Media
Editorial Projects in Education
Education Writers Association
Foundation for Public Broadcasting in Georgia
Institute for Advanced Journalism Studies
InterMedia Study
International Center for Journalism
International Center for Journalists
International Women’s Media Foundation
InterNews Network
Johns Hopkins University
Learning Matters, Inc.
Lincoln Square Productions, LLC
Link Media, Inc
Mater Medical Research Institute
National Conference of Editorial Writers Foundation
National Journal Group
National Press Foundation
National Public Radio (NPR)
New Venture Fund
Overseas Development Institute
President and Fellows of Harvard College
ProPublica, Inc.
Project Hope (to publish papers on global health issues)
Public Library of Science
Public Radio International
Regents of the University of California Berkley
Rhodes University
SeattleFoundation
Seattle University
Stanford University
Steps International Foundation
Teachers College, Columbia University
Aspen Institute, Inc.
Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation
United Nations Foundation
Unity Journalists of Color, Inc.
WGBH Educational Foundation
Washington News Council
World Health Organization
Is it any wonder that when the London Telegraph publishes a positive story about the Gates Foundation’s work on tropical diseases (without disclosing their sponsorship, per article), the British Medical Journal releases a study on tropical diseases at nearly the same time that upfront quotes from a Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation spokesperson and refers to their activities in working with 13 pharmaceutical companies? [No direct connection between Gates and BMJ is alleged here.]
Biased? Paid Media Partners Praise Vaccine, GMO Programs Led by Bill Gates telegraph bmj tropical diseases
The White House has been under fire– both during the George W. Bush Administration as well as the Barack Obama Administration (also, campaign plants on CNN)– for paid news scandals masquerading as fair, but friendly reporting. They are, of course, taxpayer funded government institutes, making their conflicts of interest more poignant and controversial.
Yet, in the quasi-private sector where numerous large foundations, with the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation chief among them, also grant money to media outlets while simultaneously promoting campaigns (like GAVI and AGRA) where they hope for positive coverage, questions of ethics also arise. Given the scope of operations at Gates, Rockefeller and other mega-foundations, there is no doubt that decisions they make– in what and how to promote– can have consequences for the world’s population that even outweigh what governments do.
Biased? Paid Media Partners Praise Vaccine, GMO Programs Led by Bill Gates GatesFoundation gears
With that in mind, it is time that Bill Gates’ image in “the media” as a savior of the poor be blemished with the full light of day and balanced with full criticism and deep discussion about the impact his foundation’s choices can have on our very livelihoods and future.

Opposition Leader Wants Syrian President and His Family Sodomized and Murdered Kurt Nimmo Infowars.com
January 31, 2012

Haitham Maleh, a founding member of the executive committee of the Syrian National Council, has called for murdering president Bashar al-Assad, his British wife and three children. Maleh wants the al-Assad family murdered the same way Muammar Gaddafi was.
Opposition Leader Wants Syrian President and His Family Sodomized and Murdered 117837519 590x365
Gaddafi was sodomized with a Bicketti, or a utility tool known as a Becker Knife and Tool, after he was captured by al-Qaeda affiliated National Transitional Council rebels in October. A frame-by-frame analysis of a video on the GlobalPost website clearly shows a rebel fighter inserting the knife in Gaddafi’s rear end.
“Assad and his family will be killed in Syria. Their next steps will be very bloody. Two months ago we offered him the option to leave us alone and go, but instead he went for the blood of his people. The end for him will be that he is killed like Gaddafi,” Maleh said during an interview with The Telegraph newspaper. (Emphasis added.)
The comment was ignored by the establishment media in the United States.
According to the Egyptian daily Al-Masry-Al-Youm, the al-Assad family recently attempted to flee the country, but was ambushed en route to the airport by the Free Syrian Army. The wife of the Syrian leader, Asma Assad, attempted to leave with her children when the Free Syrian Army fired a salvo at the convoy, The Epoch Times reported on Monday.
The Syrian National Council is currently recognized and supported by 12 UN member states, with two of those being permanent members of the Security Council — France, the United States, Spain, Bulgaria, Tunisia, and also Libya’s National Transitional Council. The latter is working closely with the Syrian National Council and the Free Syria Army.
Earlier this month it was reported that MI6, the CIA, and British SAS are in Syria working with the Free Syrian Army and the Syrian National Council to overthrow the al-Assad regime. The Free Syrian Army is widely recognized as a creation of NATO.
It is comprised largely of militants from the Muslim Brotherhood – itself an asset of British intelligence – and is funded, supported, and armed by the United States, Israel, and Turkey.
Architecture of Evil, America and the Luciferian Wars  By Paul McGuire  January 31, 2012  NewsWithViews.com
The Tower of Babel in the Old Testament is an astrological worship tower headed up by an occult-leader, Nimrod. The term Babel of Babylon literally means the “gate of god.” It refers to a portal into an invisible realm, parallel universe, or spiritual world. All the ancient Babylonian occult religions had their origins in ancient Babylon. The key to understanding Babylon is understanding three things:
First, the Tower of Babel was the world’s first global government, which God judged because He could see into man’s heart and observe mankind’s motive was to rebel and be like God. This was the great sin of Satan and it was the seductive bait behind getting Adam and Eve to eat from the “Tree in the middle of the Garden of Eden.” The idea was, if Adam and Eve eat this fruit, they “would be like gods knowing good and evil.” To become like God, is man’s greatest temptation. It is the driving force behind all Luciferian religions. The Illuminati forces in the world believe that a select elite among man, would become the Illumined ones and receive Luciferian illumination. This is depicted, by the all-seeing eye on the pyramid printed on the back of the US. dollar. The pyramid represents the Luciferian power structure. At the base of the pyramid are the words, “Novus Ordo Seclorum,” or “New Order of the Ages,” which means New World Order. The masses, represented by the base of the pyramid, are the serfs or slaves of the New World Order. Those who have received the Luciferian initiation of the all-seeing eye of Lucifer are the Illumined ones. They are the elite at the top of the pyramid who rule the masses. That is where our society is going on now. It is going to be headed up by elite who control the New World Order.
This idea goes back to ancient Egypt when the Pharaoh, along with his religious order, had the Hebrew slaves build the great pyramids which were both spiritual and technological Pharaoh and his family were the Illumined ones. The slaves who built the pyramids served the New World. Notice again, the Pyramid structure on the back of the U.S. dollar. The United States is ruled by a secret occult hierarchy The Mason symbols are all over Washington D.C.
The architectural street design in the Government Center in Washington, D.C. was laid out in such a manner that certain Luciferic symbols are depicted by the streets, cul-de-sacs, and rotaries. The deliberate Luciferic plan was created by a Masonic architect in 1791; just a few years after Freemasonry took control of the New World Order in 1782. For centuries, occult leaders in Europe were told by their spirit guides that the new American continent was to be established as the new "Atlantis.” The Illuminati officially was created in 1776 and they controlled the international banking system from England. The secret occult destiny of America was to assume the global leadership to lead the New World Order. Despite the outward trappings of America being a Judeo Christian nation, from its birth, the United States of America was chosen to lead the world into the kingdom of Antichrist. It is no accident that the Federal Reserve and an illuminati-controlled banking system control the real power in the United States. It is no accident that George W. Bush, Sr. openly used the term, “New World Order,” and the occult teacher Madame Blavatsky’s term, “a thousand points of light.” The Federal Reserve, the Council on Foreign Relations, and the United Nations are all direct instruments of the New World Order. They control our destiny, not”We the people.”
There are secret Freemason meanings hidden in the architecture of the maps of Washington D.C The streets were deliberately laid out to communicate the secret plan that the occultists had for America in 1791. This street and monument design shows that the Plan for a New World Order was planned a long time ago, but not necessarily inevitable. I do not believe the Bible teaches fatalism, except in those cases where certain prophecies must be fulfilled. We must remember that America is not specifically mentioned in the Bible, except by inference. As such, we would do well to stop imagining an American hell! If you wanted to strategically brainwash your enemy into accepting defeat, the most powerful way would be to convince him, that it is the will of God for their nation to be taken over and there is nothing you can do to change that destiny. That is not what the Bible teaches! God is all-powerful, not the Illuminati! Resist propaganda and remember that God is the Creator and we are his creation.
Men and women are created in the image of God. Therefore, we have been given by God the power to create! Since we are made in the image of God, we are creative. God does create laws and limits and some of this is encoded in Bible prophecy. But, absolutely nowhere in the Bible is fatalism taught! Fatalism is the counterfeit of spirituality. The future of America is not fixed. It is not written in stone. When you believe a half-truth or take a truth out of context, you believe a lie.
God gave you an intellect, the ability to learn, invent, and create. The artist is more powerful than the politician. This is a multi-dimensional truth you must fully own if you are to fulfill God’s will in your life and nation. The occult master, Adolph Hitler, took over Nazi, Germany and slaughtered 6 million Jews, not because it was the will of God, but because the church abdicated its responsibility and allowed Hitler to take over. “The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing!” Good men are doing nothing is why evil is taking over America and Europe. The serpent-like belief in powerlessness has spread its venom deep into our collective consciousness and it is a lie that must exposed for what it is. It is time to confront the lie or perish in the newly refurbished gas chambers of the Illuminati “re-education,” camps. The brainwashed masses consoled each other with the lie which said, “It can’t happen here,” in Dachau in 1933.
When the architect, Pierre Charles L'Enfante, a Freemason, laid out Governmental Center of Washington, D.C., in 1791, he planned to hide occultic magical symbols which hide an inner meaning such as the Swastika, the SS lightning bolts, and iron crosses did. The Pentagram, which was hidden inside the Pentagon, contains the same Luciferian imagery hidden behind the Third Reich. Like America, today with its secret societies like Skull and Bones, Bohemian Grove, and Lucis Trust (once called Lucifer Trust), the same occultic energies that infuse these institutions through the occult teacher Madame Blavatsky, once infused Hitler as he had her book on his nightstand. Hitler wrote a book called, “The New World Order.”
The Washington Monument is the most important Presidential monument to the occultist because it is an obelisk set inside a circle. The obelisk is a tall, four-sided stone pillar tapering toward a pyramidal top. The obelisk is critically important to the occultists because they believe that the spirit of the ancient Egyptian sun god, Ra, resided in the obelisk. Thus, the obelisk represents the very presence of the sun god, whom the Bible calls Satan.
There are three major obelisks in the world today. Two of them are in the United States. The first major obelisk was constructed in St. Peter's square in Rome and is positioned so that every Pope who addresses the crowd in the square must face the obelisk The second obelisk was brought to America in 1881 from Alexandria, Egypt, and was placed in Central Park in New York City.
The third obelisk is the Washington Monument in honor or our First President, George Washington. The Washington Monument was constructed by Masons, according to Masonic teachings, as a symbol that this country was controlled by Freemasonry from the very beginning.
The Washington Monument has 8 windows, and together they total 39 square feet in size. The number 39 is very sacred because it is formed by multiplying 3x13. The windows signify the importance of the Number 8 in Occultic Numerology. It means “New Beginnings," combined with the meaning of Number 13, as "Extreme Rebellion.”
Clearly, the power of leadership to drive this country toward the New World Order, leading the rest of the world, lies in the Illuminati, the Federal Reserve, and Freemasonry, not in the White House or the Congress. These symbols, built into the physical layout of a Government Center in Washington, D.C., represent the extent of that power.
We are now approaching the “End of the Age” and the vision of “The Third World War,” envisioned by Albert Pike in 1870. The deliberate destruction of the Constitution and the implementation of the Illuminati Manifesto is the exact source of the Communist Manifesto. The Biblical prophecies of a coming one world government, a one world economic system, and the coming one world religion are emerging before our very eyes just as the Bible predicted. I expose all of these hidden agendas and their roots in my 3 DVD-series, “Are You Ready for the Coming One World Government, One World Economic System, and the Coming One World Religion?” which reveal to you the truth of a great cosmic conspiracy that has been happening since the beginning of time. It is time to understand the multi-dimensional nature of the battle that we are engaged in.
more...

SOLDIERS4JESUS2 NEWS
Soldiers4Jesus Christian News

Do you know what Sharia (Islamic) Law is? Obama does..."Change" ?
*Islamic Law, known as "Shariah": primary source of persecution for Christians in Muslim States
*American Thinker: Top ten reasons why sharia is bad for all
 



#17481 From: Supreme Law Firm <paulandrewmitchell2004@...>
Date: Thu Feb 2, 2012 9:00 pm
Subject: Microsoft now partnering with Merck for drug & vaccine development technology
paulandrewmi...
Send Email Send Email
 
"Washington D.C. is just a corporate-run corruption operation that routinely betrays the People."


7,000,000,000 - 500,000,000 = 6,500,000,000 (cf. "Georgia Guidestones")

http://hnn.us/articles/1796.html

Eugenics was the racist pseudoscience determined to wipe away all human beings deemed "unfit," preserving only those who conformed to a Nordic stereotype. Elements of the philosophy were enshrined as national policy by forced sterilization and segregation laws, as well as marriage restrictions, enacted in twenty-seven states. In 1909, California became the third state to adopt such laws. Ultimately, eugenics practitioners coercively sterilized some 60,000 Americans, barred the marriage of thousands, forcibly segregated thousands in "colonies," and persecuted untold numbers in ways we are just learning. Before World War II, nearly half of coercive sterilizations were done in California, and even after the war, the state accounted for a third of all such surgeries.  [end quote]


http://www.naturalnews.com/034848_Microsoft_Merck_eugenics.html


Microsoft buys eugenics technology from Merck,
becomes drug development partner with top global vaccine manufacturer

Thursday, February 02, 2012
by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger
Editor of NaturalNews.com

Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/034848_Microsoft_Merck_eugenics.html#ixzz1lGBGtoAF


 

----- Forwarded Message -----
From: FREEDOM FIGHTERS FOR AMERICA <chris@...>
To: freedomfightersforamerica@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, February 2, 2012 9:31 AM
Subject: [freedomfightersforamerica] Fw: Microsoft now partnering with Merck for drug & vaccine development technology
 


NaturalNews Insider Alert ( www.NaturalNews.com ) email newsletter
(Unsubscribe instructions at bottom)
Dear NaturalNews readers,
The truth about Microsoft and the Bill Gates global vaccination agenda just keeps getting more bizarre by the day.
Now we learn that back in 2009, Microsoft purchased a gene-targeting drug and vaccine development company from Merck, then entered into a collaboration agreement with Merck to develop genetically-targeted drug and vaccine technology.
Remember, Bill Gates called GMOs "high tech agriculture." And he has openly and publicly admitted that he wants to use vaccines to engage inglobal depopulation.
Skeptical? Read this story yourself, check out the links, watch the video and then see what you think:
http://www.naturalnews.com/034848_Microsoft_Merck_eugenics.html

The former VP of Monsanto (Michael Taylor) is slated to be granted a top position at the FDA. Surprised? Washington D.C. is just a corporate-run corruption operation that routinely betrays the People. Take action now to oppose Michael Taylor's involvement with the FDA:
http://www.naturalnews.com/034847_Michael_Taylor_Monsanto_FDA.html

Johnson & Johnson has issued yet another health hazard warning, this time about its baby lotion being contaminated with potentially deadly bacteria:
http://www.naturalnews.com/034846_Johnson_&_baby_lotion_bacteria.html

And did you know that crops are sprayed with MSG? Bizarre food fact:
http://www.naturalnews.com/034845_MSG_glutamic_acid_crops.html

Hey, do you think members of Congress should be allowed to engage in insider trading? Currently they do it every day, and they just explain it's a "benefit" of being in Congress. A new law aims to crack down on this corruption practice in Congress:
http://www.naturalnews.com/034839_STOCK_Act_insider_trading_Congress.html

Must-see video: Check out our video interview with "economic hitman" John Perkins! Fresh interview with Jonathan Landsman and the Health Ranger:
http://tv.naturalnews.com/v.asp?v=111332E809229FA272EBFA532B954772

P.S. I'm the keynote speaker at an upcoming "Self Reliance Expo" in Dallas Texas, happening in 10 days or so. Check it out, and come visit the expo at:
www.SelfRelianceExpo.com

P.S. We have just launched our Webseed affiliate program. Earn 15% promoting our programs on preparedness, natural cures, vaccines and more. Sign up as an affiliate at:
http://affiliate.webseed.com/affiliatesignup.asp

More news continues below...
This email newsletter is made possible by sponsorship from these quality product providers: ( more info )
5 Unusual veggies that kill belly fat?  See some odd fat-fighters.
• Is deep, restful sleep escaping you? A simple super-mineral can help you today.
New form of CoQ10 - called Accel - is 8 times more potent than regular CoQ10
Today's Feature Stories:

Microsoft buys eugenics technology from Merck, becomes drug development partner with top global vaccine manufacturer
(NaturalNews) When you buy Microsoft products, you are now promoting the pharmaceutical industry and its global vaccine agenda. That's the new reality in which we live, where the world's largest software company is "in bed" with the world's largest vaccine...

Help stop former Monsanto VP from attaining top position at the FDA - sign the petition
(NaturalNews) The one man who may be responsible for more food related illnesses and deaths than anyone in history, Michael R. Taylor, has just been promoted from US Food Safety Czar to Senior Advisor to the Commissioner...

Johnson & Johnson baby lotion found contaminated with deadly bacteria
(NaturalNews) More quality control issues at Johnson & Johnson (J&J) have spurred yet another consumer product recall. At least 2,200 bottles of Aveeno Baby Calming Comfort Lotion from lot number 0161LK have been found to be contaminated with coagulase...

Crops being sprayed with MSG, glutamic acid as chemical growth enhancers
(NaturalNews) Many Natural News readers know of government requirements for irradiating raw almonds and herbs, destroying their nutritional value, under the guise of food safety. This and pasteurizing milk are but two examples of how federal agencies...

SaneVax writes open letter to Kathleen Sebelius: Rescind approval of Gardasil due to lack of efficacy during post-licensure monitoring
(NaturalNews) According to a recently published, industry-sponsored study conducted on 12,852 young women, HPV vaccination was found to reduce HPV-16 infections a mere 0.6% in vaccinated women versus unvaccinated women. At the same time, other high-risk...

Forget personal privacy - UK to microchip prescription medicines with new smart pill
(NaturalNews) Under the guise of helping people remember to take their medications as prescribed, a new microchip product called Helius, or the Raisin Personal Monitor, will be attached to pills in the UK by the end of 2012. The product is designed by...

Stinging Nettle is effective in treating BPH, arthritis, and aids post-partum mothers
(NaturalNews) Many people can relate to the experience of brushing up against a stinging nettle plant in a pasture or meadow. The unforgettable chemical burn creates mean welts which can sting for a week. However, stinging nettle (Urtica dioica

HPV vaccines (Gardasil) now pushed onto boys in Canada
(NaturalNews) There is still a whole lot of money to be made from pushing human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines on young people around the world. But in order to accomplish this, the market for the vaccines, which include Merck & Co.'s Gardasil and GlaxoSmithKline's...

Congress may force TSA to test body scanners for radiation
(NaturalNews) Ever since Homeland Security Chief Michael Chertoff made a fortune selling his naked body scanners to the federal government in 2010, health and privacy concerns over these devices have been both repeatedly raised and in turn categorically...

STOCK Act introduced to limit insider trading of members of Congress
(NaturalNews) Congress seems to be getting the message that it is the most unpopular of all government institutions, because suddenly everyone on Capitol Hill...

Exercising your brain proven to help prevent Alzheimer's
(NaturalNews) A new study demonstrates that an active brain is just as essential to continued health as an active body. Researchers have learned that fewer deposits of beta-amyloid, a destructive protein associated with Alzheimer's, appear in the brain...

Sign the petition to investigate the MPAA for bribery over SOPA
(NaturalNews) The powers that be sure seem to be pulling out all the stops in their attempt to win passage of the notorious Stop Online Privacy Act, or SOPA, which - if it...

Ready to save money on organic groceries and more? Free 30-day trial membership at Green PolkaDot Box for NaturalNews readers
(NaturalNews) Green PolkaDot Box, the new online discount retailer of organic groceries and personal care products, has extended an exclusive offer to NaturalNews readers: Try their membership free for 30 days and see just how much you can save on holistic...

Thyroid medical scans use radioactive dye, now linked to permanent thyroid damage
(NaturalNews) Cardiac computed tomography (CT) and other medical scans sometimes involve injecting a radioactive iodide dye into the bloodstreams of patients in order to highlight the produced images. But a new study published in the journal Archives...

Bill Gates funds technology to destroy your sperm
(NaturalNews) Mass vaccination is apparently not the only depopulation strategy being employed by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, as new research funded by the organization has developed a way to deliberately destroy sperm using ultrasound technology...





#17482 From: "BATR@..." <batr@...>
Date: Thu Feb 2, 2012 10:04 pm
Subject: Negotium Business essay - International Business - Davos Style
sartre
Send Email Send Email
 

The first lesson of international business is that the monopolies that drive the commercial trading system only hold loyalty to the god of capital. Making money means retaining a profit on trading transactions of business companies. The notion of MAKING MONEY means something very different to the financial empires that speculate on currencies, commodities, bonds and equities. When the two worlds come together to celebrate the common interest of their pirate culture, the Davos port of call, is a necessary winter holiday.

Read the entire article on the Negotium archive page

Discuss or comment about this essay on the BATR Forum

 


#17483 From: Supreme Law Firm <paulandrewmitchell2004@...>
Date: Fri Feb 3, 2012 2:40 pm
Subject: 6th Circuit Opinion refers to the Constitution as an "urban legend"
paulandrewmi...
Send Email Send Email
 

----- Forwarded Message -----
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell <supremelawfirm@...>
Sent: Thursday, February 2, 2012 7:47 PM
Subject: Still More Re: Disagreeable 6th Circuit Opinion: Article VI, Section 3 is an "urban legend" ???

http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-6th-circuit/1144357.html#footnote_13

We hope, nonetheless, that our opinion in this case
will help speed the demise of this particular “urban legend.”  <---- their words, not mine!!!



Since when has an obligation expressly mandated by the Constitution
degenerated into an "urban legend"??



This document contains OPM's written policies for implementing
5 U.S.C. 3331:

http://www.opm.gov/feddata/gppa/gppa03.pdf


Chapter 3. General Instructions for Processing Personnel Actions

c. Oath of Office.

As part of the entry-on-duty process, the
employee takes the oath of office. The
Standard Form 61, Appointment Affidavit,
contains the oath of office (part A) required
by 5 U.S.C. 3331, the affidavit on striking
against the Federal Government (part B)
required by 5 U.S.C. 7311, and the affidavit
on purchase and sale of office (part C) that 5
U.S.C. 3332 requires officers to complete.
...
Persons appointed as “officers” must swear
to or affirm the oath of office and the
affidavits in parts B and C. (“Officers” are
justices and judges of the United States
and individuals who are required by
law to be appointed by the President, a court
of the United States, the head of an
Executive agency, or the Secretary of a
military department; persons appointed as
“officers” are invested by law with authority
delegated from the heads of departments or
independent establishments.)


[end quote]

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell <supremelawfirm@...>
Date: Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 7:22 PM
Subject: More Re: Disagreeable 6th Circuit Opinion


Before:  BATCHELDER and DAUGHTREY, Circuit Judges;  ROSEN, District Judge.*


http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/batchelder.alice/
http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/batchelder.alice/affidavit.gif
http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/batchelder.alice/oath.gif

http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/daughtrey.martha/
http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/daughtrey.martha/affidavit.gif
http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/daughtrey.martha/oath.gif

But Merritt turned up withOUT OPM SF-61 APPOINTMENT AFFIDAVITS:

http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/merritt.gilbert/nad.missing.credentials.htm 
(PAST DUE and IN DEFAULT)

... so both of Daughtrey's credentials above violate 5 U.S.C. 2903 (Authority to administer)


ROSEN, District Judge:

http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/rosen.gerald/
http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/rosen.gerald/affidavit.gif  (Clerk certified this copy here!)
http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/rosen.gerald/oath.gif  (Clerk certified this copy here!)



Conclusion:  the "opinion" you cite is unconstitutional, at a minimum
because Merritt had no authority to administer credentials for Daughtrey.



--
Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964
http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/agency/private.attorney.general.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/reading.list.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/index.htm (Home Page)
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.policy.htm (Support Policy)
http://www.supremelaw.org/guidelines.htm (Client Guidelines)
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.guidelines.htm (Policy + Guidelines)

All Rights Reserved without Prejudice




---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell <supremelawfirm@...>
Date: Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 6:58 PM
Subject: Re: Disagreeable 6th Circuit Opinion


There is fair amount of double talk in the decision you have cited below:

First of all, 3331 distinguishes "civil service" and "uniformed service":
this distinction means to contrast "civilian" positions v. "military" positions.
Employees of the Judicial Branch are all in "civil service", not "military service".

Strictly speaking, the Clerk of Court is the designated legal custodian
of each Federal Court's records, and each such "court" is the designated
legal custodian of the APPOINTMENT AFFIDAVITS that required by
5 U.S.C. 3331, not the Judges appointed to any given Court.

See 5 U.S.C. 2906:

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/5/2906.html

The oath of office taken by an individual under section 3331 of this title
shall be delivered by him to, and preserved by, the House of Congress, agency, or court
to which the office pertains.


Ask yourself this question:  why would 2906 even mention "the court"
and the credential required by 5 U.S.C. 3331, if the OPM SF-61 APPOINTMENT
AFFIDAVITS were NOT required of all Federal Justices, Judges, Magistrates,
Clerks and Deputy Clerks, and if those credentials were NOT required
to be in the legal custody of the Office of Clerk of Court?


Reductio ad absurdum!


Likewise, if any given Judge had moved that credential into his/her chambers,
I would argue that the credential in question should be conveyed back
into the custody of the Clerk of Court (probably a different room in the courthouse). 

Every Judge will eventually retire or die,
but the Court's records would need
to remain intact in perpetuity.


Nevertheless, 5 U.S.C. 3331 is one of 2 federal statutes which require
2 separate OATHs of all Federal Judges.  The other is 28 U.S.C. 453.

This is a matter of constitutional importance because the Oath of Office
is imposed upon Federal Judges by Article VI, Section 3 of the Constitution:


http://www.supremelaw.org/ref/whuscons/whuscons.htm#6:3
 The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the
Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and
judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several
States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this
Constitution ....

On the merits, THAT IS THE FUNDAMENTAL LAW TO BE OBEYED HERE!!
And, insofar as the Seventh Circuit has attempted to circumvent this supreme Law,
their efforts in that regard are blatantly unconstitutional.

Frankly, I suspect that the paragraph you are quoting was written by law clerks.


5 U.S.C. 3331 requires an Oath of Office of all Federal employees:

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/5/3331.html

Note the last sentence:

"This section does not affect other oaths required by law."

In other words, satisfying 3331 cannot be used as proof
that a Federal officer or employee has satisfied any other statutes
imposing any other oaths, like 28 U.S.C. sections 453 and 951.


3331 imposes a "generic" oath upon all Federal personnel.

Typically, a second statute imposes a "specific" oath --
with language that defines the duties that are specific
to the office in question i.e. 28 U.S.C. 453 for judges
and magistrates;  28 U.S.C. 951 for clerks and deputy clerks:

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/28/453.html

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/28/951.html


The other cases and the Attorney General Opinion cited next
all agree that Federal Judges must have executed
a proper OATH OF OFFICE:

http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions.htm

Note this holding by the Seventh Circuit, in particular:


Law requires the judge selected to take an oath of office.
 
[U.S. ex rel. Scott v. Babb]
[199 F.2d 804 (7th Cir. 1952)]


 
Without taking the oath prescribed by law, one cannot become a judge either de jure or de facto, and such an individual is without authority to act and his acts as such are void until he has taken the prescribed oath.
 
[French v. State, 572 S.W.2d 934]
[Brown v. State, 238 S.W.2d 787]
 
 
 
Appointment was complete upon taking oath.
 
[Glavey v. U.S., 182 U.S. 595 (1901)]
 
 
Judges are required to take oaths.
 
[7 Op Atty Gen 303]
 
 
Oath was prerequisite to compensation of judges.
 
[7 Op Atty Gen 303]
 
 
The salaries of all judges of courts of the United States are due from the date of appointment;  but the party does not become entitled to draw pay until he has entered on the duties of his office, or at least taken his official oath;  for, until then, though under commission, he is not actually in office;  and in some cases, as that of the territorial judges of Oregon, Washington, Kansas, and Nebraska, salary, though due from date of appointment, cannot be drawn until the judge enters on duty in the Territory.
[7 Op Atty Gen 303 supra]
 
 
Oath was prerequisite to official duties and salary.
 
[19 Op Atty Gen 219]
 

Furthermore, the absence of OATHS required of Clerks of Court and
Deputy Clerks of Court necessarily implicates violations of 28 U.S.C. 1691;
and violations of 1691 do deprive Federal Courts of jurisdiction i.e.
a SUMMONS IN A CIVIL CASE is not valid if it does not exhibit
the Clerk's authorized signature and the Court's official seal;
similarly, the word "process" also embraces all Court ORDERS:


http://www.supremelaw.org/stat/62/28usc1691.case.law.htm

http://www.supremelaw.org/stat/62/28usc1691.case.law.2.htm


p.s.
Be careful, Greg, because you are dealing with very dishonest people.



--
Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964
http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/agency/private.attorney.general.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/reading.list.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/index.htm (Home Page)
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.policy.htm (Support Policy)
http://www.supremelaw.org/guidelines.htm (Client Guidelines)
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.guidelines.htm (Policy + Guidelines)

All Rights Reserved without Prejudice


On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 6:08 PM, Greg  wrote:
Doing some research in preparation for the appeal I’m writing, I came across this opinion from the 6th Circuit that the group might profit from reviewing (and, perhaps, correcting).  Your feedback will be most appreciated as I’m considering the inclusion of such a challenge in the appeal.

All Right Reserved. Non Assumpsit. 28 USC 1746(1)


- Greg

UNITED STATES v. CONCES

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Charles CONCES, Individually and d/b/a Chairman of the National Lawman Committee(s) for the Public Interest, an unincorporated organization, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 07-1343.
-- November 16, 2007

Full text at: http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-6th-circuit/1144357.html

Highlights regarding Conces attempt to challenge the District Court’s jurisdiction and the Appellate Court’s response appear below:
...
he served upon the Government two motions that the district court deemed frivolous, in which he demanded that the district judge produce his “Oaths of Office” and challenged the court's subject matter jurisdiction.
5  (footnote: According to the Government, this was the nineteenth such jurisdictional challenge made by Conces during the course of the district court proceedings.)


III. ISSUES RAISED ON APPEAL
(5) Whether the district court lacked jurisdiction because of the district judge's failure to keep his “Oaths of Office” on file and produce them upon the request of a party;

IV. ANALYSIS

A.... We also must address Conces's argument that he was denied due process and a right to be heard before being jailed for civil contempt.   Finally, because jurisdictional challenges may be entertained at any time, we will consider whether the district court lacked subject matter jurisdiction in light of the district judge's failure to produce his “Oaths of Office” in response to Conces's repeated demands.

D. The District Court Had No Obligation to Produce Any “Oaths of Office.”

 Conces next challenges the district court's subject matter jurisdiction over this case, in light of the district judge's failure to comply with his demand to produce certain “oaths of office.”   Yet, the statutes upon which he principally relied in advancing this same jurisdictional challenge in the court below, 5 U.S.C. §§ 2906 and 3331,12 apply by their terms only to individuals “elected or appointed to an office of honor or profit in the civil service or uniformed services,” 5 U.S.C. § 3331 (emphasis added), and not to judicial officers.   See Miller v. Johnson, 541 F.Supp. 1165, 1171 (D.D.C.1982).   While federal judges have an analogous statutory obligation to take an oath before performing the duties of their office, see 28 U.S.C. § 453, nothing in this statute (or elsewhere in the law) requires that a district judge demonstrate to the satisfaction of a litigant in a particular case that he or she has taken this oath.   Nor has Conces suggested any reason why a district court's subject matter jurisdiction over each case on its docket should hinge upon the district judge's ability or willingness to provide the parties with such proof of his or her compliance with § 453.   Accordingly, the district court properly rejected this jurisdictional challenge as frivolous.
13
(footnote: Apart from the Lawmen website at issue in this case, we understand that other websites in the nether regions of the Internet advocate this same tactic-i.e., demanding that federal judges establish their jurisdiction by producing copies of various oaths-as well as more generally urging litigants, particularly in tax cases, to challenge the authority of federal judges.   We do not wish to dignify or draw undue attention to such websites by naming them here.   We hope, nonetheless, that our opinion in this case will help speed the demise of this particular “urban legend.”)
--

--


#17484 From: Supreme Law Firm <paulandrewmitchell2004@...>
Date: Fri Feb 3, 2012 9:20 pm
Subject: Re: GCongress> Dr. David Duke -- Update -- Now a Full Length 30 minute Documentary -- The Zionist Coverup of Organized Crime!
paulandrewmi...
Send Email Send Email
 
http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Rev.%202:9&version=NIV

http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Rev.%203:9&version=NIV




From: danny wayne <bootstrap55@...>
To:
Sent: Friday, February 3, 2012 1:09 PM
Subject: FW: GCongress> Dr. David Duke -- Update -- Now a Full Length 30 minute Documentary -- The Zionist Coverup of Organized Crime!

>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dukeupdate
> Sent: Thursday, February 2, 2012 5:02 PM
> To: dukeupdate Subscriber
> Subject: GCongress> Dr. David Duke -- Update -- Now a Full Length 30 minute Documentary -- The Zionist Coverup of Organized Crime!
>
> (Mailing list information, including unsubscription instructions, is located at the end of this message.)
> __
>
>
> ***********************************
> From Dr. David Duke
> Box 188 Mandeville, LA 70471
> +1 (985) 626-7714
> ***********************************
> February 2, 2012
>
> I have updated my Documentary on the Jewish role in Organized Crime, It is now a powerful full length documentary! 32 minutes of lightning and thunder!
>
> THE ZIONIST COVERUP OF ORGANIZED CRIME!
>
> This video reveals the fact that the Jewish-dominated media has covered the facts of the Jewish (NOT Italian) domination of organized crime and how Zionist media perpetrate a double lie in that it not only covers up the powerful role of Jews in Organized crime but ethnically slanders the Italian and the Russian Christians rather than expose far worse crimes dominated by Jewish criminal syndicates.
>
> Please be sure to rate, favorite and comment on this video! And spread it to everyone you know!
>
> Also, Don't forget my radio program is now on LIVE every day at 11am Eastern Time USA.
>
> My radio program is also available on demand within ten minutes after the end of each show! You can go to http:DavidDuke.com right now and click on the archive link and hear all the shows so far!
>
> LIVE! 11 AM Eastern Time USA --- 5 PM Central European Time
> Or ON DEMAND anytime after the close of the show (forever)
> Go here for links to the show: http://www.davidduke.com
>
> Here is the link for The Zionist Coverup of Organized Crime!
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y3GMDcFOq0g
>
> Thanks so much for your efforts and support, with your help we will win this fight someday!
>
> Remember it is your support that enables and empowers my work!
>
>
> Dr. David Duke
>
> If you wish to support my work just click on the following link. Thanks!
> ************************************************************************************
> http://www.davidduke.com/general/thanks-for-lending-a-hand_25146.html
> *************************************************************************************
> PS I appreciate you very much and You are welcome to send me a personal email at
> mailto:Info65@...
>
> Here's the link again:
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y3GMDcFOq0g
>
> --
> The following information is a reminder of your current mailing
> list subscription:
>
> You are subscribed to the following list:
>
> dukeupdate
>
> using the following email:
>
> generalcongress@...
>
> You may unsubscribe from this list at any time by
> visiting the following URL:
>
> http://www.davidduke.com/cgi-bin/dada/mail.cgi/u/dukeupdate/generalcongress/constitutionalgov.us/
>
> If the above URL is inoperable, make sure that you have copied the
> entire address. Some mail readers will wrap a long URL and thus break
> this automatic unsubscribe mechanism.
>
> You may also change your subscription by visiting this list's main screen:
>
> http://www.davidduke.com/cgi-bin/dada/mail.cgi/list/dukeupdate
>
> If you're still having trouble, please contact the list owner at:
>
> <mailto:webmaster@...>
>
> The following physical address is associated with this mailing list:
>
> 240 Garden Ave.
> Mandeville, LA 70471
>
> Mailing List Powered by Dada Mail
> http://www.davidduke.com/cgi-bin/dada/mail.cgi/what_is_dada_mail/=
> _______________________________________________
> GeneralCongress mailing list; Subscribe or Unsubscribe here:
> GeneralCongress@...
> http://constitutionalgov.us/mailman/listinfo/generalcongress_constitutionalgov.us
>
> Please note that we have a 300-kilobyte size-limit on the emails that go out over our email-list.
>
> Please patronize the following patriotic businesses:
> http://www.hastyheat.com/
>
>

--




#17485 From: Supreme Law Firm <paulandrewmitchell2004@...>
Date: Sat Feb 4, 2012 6:10 pm
Subject: Private Attorney General confronts Mario Apuzzo, Esq. re: the Qualifications Clauses in the Constitution
paulandrewmi...
Send Email Send Email
 
 
 
I started reading Apuzzo's analysis above, but immediately encountered so many errors, that I had to stop.
 
When I was doing the necessary research before writing "The Federal Zone," and before the Internet became widely available, it was very difficult and time-consuming to track down standing court cases which held that we have two (2) classes of citizens in America, not one class.  We've summarized those cases here:
 
 
The second class -- uniquely called "federal citizenship" -- did not even exist prior to the 1866 Civil Rights Act.
 
This can only mean that all 3 Qualifications Clauses refer to the one and only primary class of State Citizens, namely, Citizens of ONE of the States united.  See People v. De La Guerra:  "United States" in these clauses means "States united".
 
Although Mr. Apuzzo makes a valiant attempt to appear scholarly in his article above, he does his readers a great disservice by confusing those two classes, and by failing to identify any errors in the decisions he cites.
 
Most dramatically, the so-called Fourteenth amendment was never properly ratified:  Dyett v. Turner (27 < 28 !!)
 
 
Here is the proper and historically correct way to distinguish those two classes:
 
"Citizen of the United States" means State Citizen, i.e. Citizen of ONE OF the States united
"citizen of the United States" means federal citizen, i.e. citizen of the District of Columbia
 
Accordingly, he leaves his readers almost totally incapable of deciphering what Apuzzo, and the Courts he cites, really do mean when they persist in using the term "citizen parents" -- citizens of WHAT, please?
 
Things get even muddier when Apuzzo repeats the vague phrase "born in the United States".
 
It doesn't help Apuzzo's argument that the Supreme Court has now defined "United States" to have three (3) different legal meanings, each different from the other two.  Hooven & Allison v. Evatt.  Thus, "born in the United States" must have three different meanings too!
 
Because the three Qualifications Clauses refer to the one and only primary class of State Citizens, it necessarily follows that both parents would need to be State Citizens for their offspring to be eligible for the Office of President.
 
This conclusion necessarily follows from the fact that only one class of State Citizens existed when the Qualifications Clauses were being drafted.  See Pannill v. Roanoke for a ruling that is definitive, and dispositive, on this key point:
 
 
 
But, I have come to suspect that licensed attorneys in America remain as brainwashed as the "robes" they envy, because they cannot seem to rid themselves of this false and rebuttable myth that we presently have only one class of citizens in America.
 
If you are interested in pursuing these details much further, please have a look here:
 
 
Summary:
Congress could not remove the obstacles identified in the Dred Scott decision solely by means of Federal legislation enacted by that Body.  Instead of proposing the correct constitutional amendment, Congress attempted to bypass Article V by creating a second class of federal citizens intended for black Americans who were recently freed by the Thirteenth Amendment banning slavery and involuntary servitude.
 
Thank you for your consideration.
 
 
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964



From: Phil Holtz <philholtz54@...>
To: PAUL MITCHELL <paulandrewmitchell2004@...>
Sent: Saturday, February 4, 2012 8:17 AM
Subject: Fw: Check out "ALL THAT IS WRONG WITH GEORGIA STATE JUDGE MALIHI'S DECISION - By Mario Apuzzo, Esq." on Constitutional Emergency



 
 
Twana Blevins
Check out the discussion 'ALL THAT IS WRONG WITH GEORGIA STATE JUDGE MALIHI'S DECISION - By Mario Apuzzo, Esq.'

Discussion posted by Harry Riley:

All That Is Wrong with Georgia State Judge Michael M. Malihi’s Decision that Putative President                                            ...

Discussion link:
ALL THAT IS WRONG WITH GEORGIA STATE JUDGE MALIHI'S DECISION - By Mario Apuzzo, Esq.

About Constitutional Emergency
This effort is focused on sacrifice to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies foreign and domestic.
Constitutional Emergency 5445 members
6784 photos
2539 videos
7571 discussions
170 Events
9153 blog posts
 
To control which emails you receive on Constitutional Emergency, click here



#17486 From: Supreme Law Firm <paulandrewmitchell2004@...>
Date: Sun Feb 5, 2012 3:56 pm
Subject: Re: [The Phony] War on Terror
paulandrewmi...
Send Email Send Email
 
Was it or was it not, started by Islamic people who brought it to our shores on September 11, 2001
>  and have continually threatened to do so since?

No. It was NOT! 

9/11 was a joint venture of the Central Intelligence Agency and
the Israeli secret police, aided and abetted by Pentagon officials
particularly Donald Rumsfeld and Dov S. Zakheim.


You are correct, Jerry, but the Most High has imposed a "strong delusion"
on many Americans, particularly those who have no love for the truth.  
They neither seek the truth, nor cherish it if they should find the truth.

http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=2Thess.2:10-12&version=NIV

2 Thessalonians 2:10-12

New International Version (NIV)
10 They perish because they refused to love the truth and so be saved.
11
For this reason God sends them a powerful delusion so that they will believe the lie
12
and so that all will be condemned who have not believed the truth but have delighted in wickedness.


This may help:

http://www.supremelaw.org/authors/pastore/stranger-than-fiction.htm

http://www.supremelaw.org/authors/mitchell/inside.job.htm

http://www.supremelaw.org/authors/mitchell/executive.summary.htm

Here's dramatic photographic evidence -- 2 planar fuselage sections
from a modified U.S. Navy A-3 Skywarrior, probably launched from
the flight deck of the USS George Washington while she was
anchored off the coast of Long Island on the morning of 9/11:

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/gwbush/pentagon/crane.lifting.parts.jpg
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/gwbush/pentagon/a3454nose.jpg
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/gwbush/pentagon/a3146454s.jpg
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/gwbush/pentagon/A3_7_echelon.jpg

NOTE WELL the external re-fueling line, which is unique
to the A-3 Skywarrior.

Here's what the cylindrical fuselage of a 757 looks like, during assembly:

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/gwbush/pentagon/cylindrical.fuselage.jpg



Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964(a)
http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/agency/private.attorney.general.htm
Criminal Investigator and Federal Witness: 18 U.S.C. 1510, 1512-13
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.policy.htm (Support Policy)
http://www.supremelaw.org/guidelines.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.guidelines.htm (Policy + Guidelines)

All Rights Reserved without Prejudice



From: Jerry Stanton <farm_stone@...>
To: "Cornforth-Strategies@yahoogroups.com" <Cornforth-Strategies@yahoogroups.com>; "Freedom_of_Information@yahoogroups.com" <Freedom_of_Information@yahoogroups.com>; "Light-Spectrum@yahoogroups.com" <Light-Spectrum@yahoogroups.com>; "World-wide_Politics@yahoogroups.com" <World-wide_Politics@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, February 4, 2012 10:03 PM
Subject: Re: War on Terror

I am one of those crazy people that think the only Taliban that blew anything up on 9-11 worked for the CIA and international Bankers that own this country, to overthrow and seize  this country from the inside by scaring this nations people so bad that they would give up all their rights, freedom, liberty and moral values and bankrupt their own county and destroy their children's future for safety from some unseen enemy that never existed in the first place. Check how much we owe on the national dept, how much  more fear and endless wars can we afford. Follow the money, 5000,000, homes taken, trillions of dollars taken from the federal treasury by international bankers with the help of congress and most want to kill some poor Muslim of the other side of the world thinking they are the problem. Am I crazy or is it the one that wrote the [War On Terror] below? War on terror should be our soldiers arresting criminal judges and elected officials that act outside their constitutional restraints, I think they call it treason. You choose.
Isaiah 1:18 Come now and let us reason together.
                     Lord bless Jerry James Stanton
             





----- Forwarded Message -----

To:
Sent: Friday, February 3, 2012 1:02 PM
Subject: War on Terror
 
 
 
 
Robert H. Gardner, CPA
 
 
IT IS GOOD TO SEE THIS WORDING IN PRINT!!! WE SHOULD ALL WRITE THIS KIND OF PIECE AND SEND IT IN TO 'OPINION' SECTIONS OF THE NEWS --- IF THEY WOULD PRINT IT TIM
 
 
 
----------Original Message----------r
 
 
   
 
 
I don't care that some troops pissed on some Taliban bodies. The
idiot who put it on YouTube should be castrated.

Thought you might like to read this letter to the editor. Ever notice how some people just seem to know how to write a letter?

This one surely does!

This was written by a Canadian woman, but oh how it also applies to the U.S.A. , U.K. And Australia .


THIS ONE PACKS A FIRM PUNCH


Written by a housewife in New Brunswick , to her local newspaper. This is one ticked off lady...


"Are we fighting a war on terror or aren't we? Was it or was it not, started by Islamic people who brought it to our shores on September 11, 2001and have continually threatened to do so since?

Were people from all over the world, not brutally murdered that day, in downtown Manhattan , across the Potomac from the capitol of the USA and in a field in Pennsylvania ?

Did nearly three thousand men, women and children die a horrible, burning or crushing death that day, or didn't they?

And I'm supposed to care that a few Taliban were claiming to be tortured by a justice system of a nation they are fighting against in a brutal Insurgency.

I'll care about the Koran when the fanatics in the Middle East, start caring about the Holy Bible, the mere belief of which, is a crime punishable by beheading in Afghanistan.

I'll care when these thugs tell the world they are sorry for hacking off Nick Berg's head, while Berg screamed through his gurgling slashed throat.

I'll care when the cowardly so-called 'insurgents' in Afghanistan , come out and fight like men, instead of disrespecting their own religion by hiding in Mosques and behind women and children.

I'll care when the mindless zealots who blow themselves up in search of Nirvana, care about the innocent children within range of their suicide Bombs.

I'll care when the Canadian media stops pretending that their freedom of Speech on stories, is more important than the lives of the soldiers on the ground or their families waiting at home, to hear about them when something happens.

In the meantime, when I hear a story about a CANADIAN soldier roughing up an Insurgent terrorist to obtain information, know this:

I don't care.

When I see a wounded terrorist get shot in the head when he is told not to move because he might be booby-trapped, you can take it to the bank:

I don't care. Shoot him again.

When I hear that a prisoner, who was issued a Koran and a prayer mat, and fed 'special' food, that is paid for by my tax dollars, is complaining that his holy book is being 'mishandled,' you can absolutely believe, in your heart of hearts:

I don't care.

And oh, by the way, I've noticed that sometimes it's spelled 'Koran' and other times 'Quran.' Well, Jimmy Crack Corn you guessed it.

I don't care!!

If you agree with this viewpoint, pass this on to all your E-mail Friends. Sooner or later, it'll get to the people responsible for this ridiculous behavior!

If you don't agree, then by all means hit the delete button. Should you choose the latter, then please don't complain when more atrocities committed by radical Muslims happen here in our great Country! And may I add:

Some people spend an entire lifetime wondering, if during their life on earth, they made a difference in the world. But, the Soldiers don't have that problem.

I have another quote that I would like to share AND...I hope you forward All this.

One last thought for the day:

Only five defining forces have ever offered to die for you:

1. Jesus Christ

2. The British Soldier.

3. The Canadian Soldier.

4. The US Soldier, and

5. The Australian Soldier

One died for your soul, the other four, for you and your children's Freedom.


YOU MIGHT WANT TO PASS THIS ON, AS MANY SEEM TO FORGET!


AMEN! GOD BLESS CANADA AND AMERICA.
 


____________________________________________________________
 
 
 
No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 10.0.1416 / Virus Database: 2109/4144 - Release Date: 01/15/12
 
 


 
--
IN GOD WE TRUST, GOD BLESS AMERICA     ck
 
____________________________________________________________ 60-Year-Old Mom Looks 27
Mom Reveals Free Wrinkle Trick That Has Angered Doctors!
ConsumerLifestyles.org





#17487 From: Supreme Law Firm <paulandrewmitchell2004@...>
Date: Sun Feb 5, 2012 4:56 pm
Subject: We respond to Harry Riley re: "ALL THAT IS WRONG WITH GEORGIA STATE JUDGE MALIHI'S DECISION - By Mario Apuzzo, Esq." on Constitutional Emergency
paulandrewmi...
Send Email Send Email
 
----- Forwarded Message -----
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell <supremelawfirm@...>
Sent: Sunday, February 5, 2012 8:46 AM
Subject: We respond to Harry Riley re: "ALL THAT IS WRONG WITH GEORGIA STATE JUDGE MALIHI'S DECISION - By Mario Apuzzo, Esq." on Constitutional Emergency

http://patriotsforamerica.ning.com/forum/topics/all-that-is-wroing-with-georgia-state-judge-malihi-s-decision-by-?commentId=2734278%3AComment%3A327955&xg_source=msg_com_forum

>  Paul ....... would you boil down your opposition to Apuzzo's position in a shortened version
>  ... exactly what you're saying is not clear to me
>  ... particularly Apuzzo's references to SCOTUS decisions?  Thanks.  -- Harry Riley

This issue is rather complicated, and it is not easily "boiled down"
into tender little morsels, due to a banker conspiracy first revealed
openly in "The Hazard Circular" (cf.)

It can be demonstrated that the U.S. Supreme Court has become
accomplices to this conspiracy by mis-classifying most Americans into a
second, inferior class of "federal citizens".  But, that second, inferior class
did NOT even exist until the 1866 Civil Right Act, assuming of course
that said Act was even constitutional, which is now in serious doubt.

We uploaded my objections to Apuzzo's treatise here:

http://www.supremelaw.org/authors/apuzzo/We.Confront.Apuzzo.htm

What he did is best described as "cherry picking" --
a methodological error which deliberately excludes evidence
that is contrary to a foregone conclusion.

The term "United States" has 3 legal meanings, each different
from the other two:  that's official now!!

http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/hooven/hooven.htm#united.states

"citizen parents" -- citizens of WHAT, please?

Here's a courageous Judge who explained the Qualifications Clauses
with great clarity, but you don't see Apuzzo citing or quoting Pablo De La Guerra:

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/gilberts/swornaff.htm#delaguerra

The United States in these provisions, means the States united.  To be twenty-five years of age, and for seven years to have been a citizen of one of the States which ratifies the Constitution, is the qualification of a representative.  To be a natural born citizen of one of the States which shall ratify the Constitution, or to be a citizen of one of said States at the time of such ratification, and to have attained the age of thirty-five years, and to have been fourteen years a resident within one of the said States, are the Presidential qualifications, according to the true meaning of the Constitution.


There are 2 maxims which have historically determined a child's citizenship:

(1) jus soli (right or law of the soil);  and

(2) jus sanguinis (right or law of blood)


Having been born at Coast Province General Hospital in the
British Protectorate of Kenya on August 4, 1961,
Mr. Obama cannot claim jus soli to prove that he was
natural born a Citizen of ONE OF the States united:

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/obama/third.circuit/subpoena/LucasSmith03.jpg
(Kenya was not, and is still not, a State of the Union: not a star on the flag!)

And, because his father was not a Citizen of ONE OF the States united
on August 4, 1961, Mr. Obama cannot claim jus sanguinis to prove
that he was natural born a Citizen of ONE OF the States united.

Chiefly due to the failed ratification of the so-called Fourteenth Amendment,
his father's race barred his father from being a State Citizen: 
this is surely a racist result, but such racism is the fault of the Congress of 1866 --
by failing to follow the written advice of the Supreme Court in Dred Scott v. Sandford:

http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/dredscot/excerpt1.htm

Likewise, that his mother was a Citizen of ONE OF the States united
on August 4, 1961, also assumes facts not in evidence.

The United States gave Mr. Obama plenty of opportunity to appear
at the Third Circuit and disprove the facts that WERE IN EVIDENCE here:

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/obama/third.circuit/nad02.htm

chiefly this official document issued by the National Assembly of the Republic of Kenya:

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/obama/Kenya/National.Assembly.Official.Report.2008-11-05.pdf

I hope this helps.  Forgive me for not being as succinct as you wished:
a complex issue like this needs to take into account all of the relevant
history, going all the way back to the Declaration of Independence,
the Articles of Confederation, and the Northwest Ordinance.

The latter is particularly helpful because it used the phrase "citizen of one of"
to define eligibility to serve in the General Assembly for the Northwest Territory:


The language employed by the convention was less careful than that which had been used by Congress in July of the same year, in framing the ordinance for the government of the Northwest Territory.  Congress had made the qualification rest upon citizenship of "one of the United States," and this is doubtless the intent of the convention which framed the Constitution, for it cannot have meant anything else.

[Studies in Constitutional Law:]
[A Treatise on American Citizenship]
[by John S. Wise, Edward Thompson Co. (1906)]

[emphasis added]

/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, Private Attorney General
representing the United States ex rel. in Berg v. Obama et al.
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/obama/third.circuit/


2012/2/5 Constitutional Emergency <mail@...>

Harry Riley replied to their discussion "ALL THAT IS WRONG WITH GEORGIA STATE JUDGE MALIHI'S DECISION - By Mario Apuzzo, Esq." on Constitutional Emergency

To view the new reply, visit:
http://patriotsforamerica.ning.com/forum/topics/all-that-is-wroing-with-georgia-state-judge-malihi-s-decision-by-?commentId=2734278%3AComment%3A327955&xg_source=msg_com_forum

--
To stop following this discussion, go to:
http://patriotsforamerica.ning.com/forum/topics/all-that-is-wroing-with-georgia-state-judge-malihi-s-decision-by-?unfollow=1&xg_source=msg_com_forum

To control which emails you receive on Constitutional Emergency, go to:
http://patriotsforamerica.ning.com/profiles/profile/emailSettings?xg_source=msg_com_forum



--




#17488 From: Supreme Law Firm <paulandrewmitchell2004@...>
Date: Sun Feb 5, 2012 5:21 pm
Subject: Private Attorney General's REPLY Re: You really have no clue, do you! NBC explained!
paulandrewmi...
Send Email Send Email
 
See also Eisner v. Macomber:

http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=US&vol=252&invol=189#206

Congress ... cannot by legislation alter the Constitution,
from which alone it derives its power to legislate, and
within whose limitations alone that power can be lawfully exercised. 


The 1866 Civil Rights Act [of Congress] did not, and could not, amend the U.S. Constitution;
amendments must comply with the provisions expressly stated at Article V:


http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/dredscot/excerpt1.htm

     No one,  we presume,  supposes that  any  change  in  public
     opinion or  feeling, in relation to this unfortunate [black]
     race, in the civilized nations of Europe or in this country,
     should induce  the  court  to  give  to  the  words  of  the
     Constitution a more liberal construction in their favor than
     they were  intended to  bear when  the instrument was framed
     and  adopted.     Such   an  argument  would  be  altogether
     inadmissible in  any tribunal called on to interpret it.  If
     any of  its provisions  are deemed  unjust, there  is a mode
     prescribed in  the instrument  itself by  which  it  may  be
     amended;   but  while  it  remains  unaltered,  it  must  be
     construed now  as it  was understood  at  the  time  of  its
     adoption.  It is not only the same in words, but the same in
     meaning, and  delegates the  same powers  to the government,
     and reserves  and secures  the same rights and privileges to
     the citizen;   and  as long  as it continues to exist in its
     present form, it speaks not only in the same words, but with
     the same meaning and intent with which it spoke when it came
     from the  hands of its framers, and was voted on and adopted
     by the  people of  the United  States.   Any other  rule  of
     construction would  abrogate the  judicial character of this
     court, and make it the mere reflex of the popular opinion or
     passion of  the day.   This  court was  not created  by  the
     Constitution for  such purposes.   Higher  and graver trusts
     have been confided to it, and it must not falter in the path
     of duty.
                            [Dred Scott v. Sandford, 19 How. 393]
                             [60 U.S. 709 (1856), emphasis added]

http://www.supremelaw.org/authors/mitchell/citizenship.for.dummies.htm

Congress could not remove the obstacles identified in that [Dred Scott] decision
solely by means of Federal legislation enacted by that Body.  Cf. Eisner v. Macomber supra!


Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964(a)
http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/agency/private.attorney.general.htm
Criminal Investigator and Federal Witness: 18 U.S.C. 1510, 1512-13
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.policy.htm (Support Policy)
http://www.supremelaw.org/guidelines.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.guidelines.htm (Policy + Guidelines)

All Rights Reserved without Prejudice



From: pc93 <pc9323@...>
To: paulandrewmitchell2004@...
Sent: Sunday, February 5, 2012 8:40 AM
Subject: Fwd: You really have no clue, do you! NBC explained!



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Tracy <tracysplace2002@...>
Date: Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 8:32 AM
Subject: You really have no clue, do you! NBC explained!
To: pc9323@...


NBC in the Constitutional drafts:

June 18th, 1787 - Alexander Hamilton suggests that the requirement be added, as: "No person shall be eligible to the office of President of the United States unless he be now a Citizen of one of the States, or hereafter be born a Citizen of the United States."
Works of Alexander Hamilton (page 407).
 
July 25, 1787 (~5 weeks later) - John Jay writes a letter to General Washington (president of the Constitutional Convention): "Permit me to hint, whether it would be wise and seasonable to provide a strong check to the admission of Foreigners into the administration of our national Government; and to declare expressly that the Commander in Chief of the American army shall not be given to nor devolve on, any but a natural born Citizen." [the word born is underlined in Jay's letter which signifies the importance of allegiance from birth.]
 
September 2nd, 1787 George Washington pens a letter to John Jay. The last line reads: "I thank you for the hints contained in your letter"
 
September 4th, 1787 (~6 weeks after Jay's letter and just 2 days after Washington wrote back to Jay) - The "Natural Born Citizen" requirement is now found in their drafts.
Madison's notes of the Convention.
------------------------------------------------
Senator Lyman Trumbull wrote the citizenship clause in the Civil Rights Act, which reads:
"That all persons born in the United States and not subject to any foreign power, excluding Indians not taxed, are hereby declared to be citizens of the United States;"

AND

Senator Jacob Howard wrote the citizenship clause in the 14th amendment, which reads:
"All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside."

Both of these clauses were amendments added in AFTER the original bill was introduced. During the debates of the 14th amendment, Senators wanted to know what "subject to the jurisdiction thereof" meant. Senator Lyman Trumbull is ON RECORD explaining what the clause meant and I quote:
"The provision is, that 'all persons born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens.' That means 'subject to the complete jurisdiction thereof.' What do we mean by 'complete jurisdiction thereof?' NOT OWING ALLEGIANCE TO ANYBODY ELSE. That is what it means."
http://memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/ampage?collId=llcg&fileName=073/llcg073.db&recNum=14

Jacob Howard concurs:
"I concur entirely with the honorable Senator from Illinois [Trumbull], in holding that the word "jurisdiction," as here employed, ought to be construed so as to imply a full and complete jurisdiction on the part of the United States, whether exercised by Congress, by the executive, or by the judicial department; that is to say, the same jurisdiction in extent and quality as applies to every citizen of the United States now."
http://memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/ampage?collId=llcg&fileName=073/llcg073.db&recNum=16

The Civil Rights Act was written by the Honorable John Bingham but the citizenship clause was added in by Senator Lyman Trumbull, when the bill went back to the House to vote on Trumbull's amendment (the citizenship clause) Bingham is ON RECORD responding to Trumbull's amendment to his bill and I quote:
"I find no fault with the introductory clause [S 61 Bill], which is simply declaratory of what is written in the Constitution, that every human being born within the jurisdiction of the United States of PARENTS NOT OWING ALLEGIANCE TO ANY FOREIGN SOVEREIGNTY is, in the language of your Constitution itself, a NATURAL BORN CITIZEN"

MIDDLE COLUMN 3RD PARAGRAPH:
http://memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/ampage?collId=llcg&fileName=071/llcg071.db&recNum=332

I'm sorry, but it doesn't get any clearer than that and this definition is coming from the EXACT men that made up the clauses aka THEIR OWN WORDS!

You may notice, that is HELPS to do your homework!



--
'The Revolution: A Manifesto'
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0446537519?ie=UTF8&tag=rc020-20&linkCode=as2&camp=1789&creative=9325&creativeASIN=0446537519



#17489 From: Supreme Law Firm <paulandrewmitchell2004@...>
Date: Sun Feb 5, 2012 11:44 pm
Subject: Excellent Video: "The Deliberate Dumbing Down of America"
paulandrewmi...
Send Email Send Email
 

----- Forwarded Message -----
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell <supremelawfirm@...>
Sent: Sunday, February 5, 2012 3:27 PM
Subject: Excellent Video: "The Deliberate Dumbing Down of America"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eZJoCfgAEuE&feature=youtu.be


The soundtrack is now available at:
http://itunes.apple.com/us/album/exposed-the-soundtrack-ep/id444615015
and
https://market.android.com/details?id=artist-Add5o4qqbmxyhwr7qwdawbyvcmu


This video was originally created to be part of an art exhibit for Exposed the Art Project http://www.exposedtheartproject.org/ , a multimedia collaboration raising awareness of social issues.

The group decided that the message in the Deliberate Dumbing Down of America shouldn't be put on hold.

So here it is.

The other artists of Exposed the Art Project are: painters Barry Gross and Viktor Safonkin, and photographers Adela Holmes and Presscott McDonald.

We picked four themes for our premier  — Social Commentary, Spirituality, Metamorphosis and Time and Chance.

This is my contribution for Social Commentary.


To see/hear more of Neal's work go to http://www.therealnealfox.com/


--
Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964
http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/agency/private.attorney.general.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/reading.list.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/index.htm (Home Page)
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.policy.htm (Support Policy)
http://www.supremelaw.org/guidelines.htm (Client Guidelines)
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.guidelines.htm (Policy + Guidelines)

All Rights Reserved without Prejudice
--




#17490 From: "BATR@..." <batr@...>
Date: Mon Feb 6, 2012 12:40 pm
Subject: BATR Strappado Wrack essay - Newt Gingrich the Skunk Vomit NeoCon
sartre
Send Email Send Email
 

Don Imus yells the slur "Skunk Vomit" as a description for Newt Gingrich. Coming from the erratic "Old Cowboy" and shock jock legend that lives on outrage and offense is nothing new to his listeners. This successor to the Andy Rooney curmudgeon institution is hardly a clarion voice of time-honored conservatives. So too, with a little investigation into Newt Gingrich you will see that the former Speaker is no true conservative. His rhetoric at times can seem appealing, but strip away the high tone platitudes and you are left with the assertions of an opportunist and a New World Order proponent.  

 

Read the entire article on the BATR archive page

 

Discuss or comment about this essay on the BATR Forum

 


#17491 From: Supreme Law Firm <paulandrewmitchell2004@...>
Date: Mon Feb 6, 2012 6:48 pm
Subject: Private Attorney General's shocking letter to Rep. Ron Paul re: $6.854 TRILLION USD now owed to the Treasury of the United States
paulandrewmi...
Send Email Send Email
 
----- Forwarded Message -----
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell <supremelawfirm@...>
Sent: Monday, February 6, 2012 10:47 AM
Subject: Private Attorney General's shocking letter to Rep. Ron Paul re: $6.854 TRILLION USD now owed to the Treasury of the United States

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/paul.ron/letter.2012-02-06/Memo.to.Ron.Paul.htm

--
Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964
http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/agency/private.attorney.general.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/reading.list.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/index.htm (Home Page)
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.policy.htm (Support Policy)
http://www.supremelaw.org/guidelines.htm (Client Guidelines)
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.guidelines.htm (Policy + Guidelines)

All Rights Reserved without Prejudice



#17492 From: Supreme Law Firm <paulandrewmitchell2004@...>
Date: Tue Feb 7, 2012 3:13 pm
Subject: Private Attorney General responds to Van Irion's fine essay: "Georgia Court Ignored Basic Rules of Interpretation"
paulandrewmi...
Send Email Send Email
 
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell <supremelawfirm@...>
Date: Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 7:00 AM
Subject: Private Attorney General responds to Van Irion's fine essay: "Georgia Court Ignored Basic Rules of Interpretation"
To: van@...
Cc: mhatfield@..., SupremeLaw <supremelaw@googlegroups.com>


http://libertylegalfoundation.org/1725/georgia-court-ignored-basic-rules-of-interpretation/


Greetings Van Irion,

Your essay above is very well written: in particular, your clear explanation
of the distinction between precedent and dicta is timely and valuable.

On the question of precedent, you might find this treatise very valuable:

http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/anastasoff/


However, I must take issue with your assumption
that the so-called 14th amendment was properly ratified.

Here, please review Dyett v. Turner:

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/knudson/judnot09.htm#dyett  (27 < 28 !!)

Thus, in our studied opinion, the past and present legal consequences
of such bad legislation should be put in its proper place, and disregarded:
it now has relevance only to demonstrate how two (2) distinct classes are clearly
embodied in Section 1 of that failed "amendment";  notably a second privileges
and immunities clause
was entirely unnecessary if freed blacks had been granted
State Citizenship straightaway!

Here's the bottom line:
The crux of the matter turns on whether the 1866 Civil Rights Act
did amend the Constitution:  of course, it did not, and could not:

http://www.supremelaw.org/authors/mitchell/citizenship.for.dummies.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/authors/mitchell/comments.on.citizenship.for.dummies.htm

Congress could not remove the obstacles identified in the Dred Scott decision
solely by means of Federal legislation enacted by that Body.


http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/dredscot/excerpt1.htm

If any of its provisions are deemed unjust,
there is a mode prescribed in the instrument itself
by which it may be amended;
but while it remains unaltered, it must be construed now
as it was understood at the time of its adoption.



Here, see also Eisner v. Macomber:

"Congress ... cannot by legislation alter the Constitution,
from which alone it derives its power to legislate and
within whose limitations alone that power can be lawfully exercised."



Mario Apuzzo also attempted to dissect Malihi's bad ruling,
but Mr. Apuzzo is demonstrably brainwashed:

http://www.supremelaw.org/authors/apuzzo/We.Confront.Apuzzo.htm


If the nation is ever going to overcome the mountain of lies
that are systematically, intentionally and most unfortunately overwhelming
some basic, simple truths in this matter, your ability to think and write
clearly should be applied to elucidate the entire historical context.

I know you can do it!

When that happens, the solution will become quite obvious,
even if painfully so.

Thank you:  my office is on your side, all appearances to the contrary
notwithstanding!

In more ways than one, the paramount issue now is courage,
not simply a bad interpretation of evidence rules.

If the Utah Supreme Court could issue a ruling like Dyett v. Turner,
the legal community in America can now face up to a proper contemporary
application of Glass v. The Sloop Betsey:

"We do not make law by force, or by fraud."

Truer words were never spoken!

--
Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964
http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/agency/private.attorney.general.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/reading.list.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/index.htm (Home Page)
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.policy.htm (Support Policy)
http://www.supremelaw.org/guidelines.htm (Client Guidelines)
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.guidelines.htm (Policy + Guidelines)

All Rights Reserved without Prejudice



--

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SupremeLaw" group.
To post to this group, send email to supremelaw@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to supremelaw+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/supremelaw?hl=en.



#17493 From: Supreme Law Firm <paulandrewmitchell2004@...>
Date: Tue Feb 7, 2012 6:54 pm
Subject: Appeals "Court": Seniors can't reject Medicare right -- BUT ... Brett M. Kavanaugh is missing all 4 credentials
paulandrewmi...
Send Email Send Email
 
----- Forwarded Message -----
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell <supremelawfirm@...>
To: opinion@...
Sent: Tuesday, February 7, 2012 10:53 AM
Subject: Appeals "Court": Seniors can't reject Medicare right -- BUT ... Brett M. Kavanaugh is missing all 4 credentials

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2017445960_apusmedicarelawsuit1stldwritethru.html?syndication=rss

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell <supremelawfirm@...>
Date: Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 10:47 AM
Subject: missing credentials for Brett M. Kavanaugh, D.C. Circuit
To: FreedomWorks <info@...>



NOTICE AND DEMAND FOR
EXHIBITION OF MISSING CREDENTIALS
 
 
TO:       Brett M. Kavanaugh
      c/o U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
          333 Constitution Avenue, N.W.
          Washington 20001
          DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, USA
 
FROM:     Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
          Private Attorney General
      c/o 501 W. Broadway, Suite A-332
          San Diego 92101
          CALIFORNIA, USA
 
DATE:     November 26, 2007 A.D.
 
SUBJECT:  missing credentials
 
 
Greetings Brett M. Kavanaugh:
 
Please be advised that a proper request submitted under the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”) has resulted in a determination that the following requisite credentials for you cannot be found or exhibited by the legal custodians of those records:
 
(1)           Presidential Commission
(2)           Oath of Office
(3)           Appointment Affidavit
(4)           Senate Confirmation
 
As of October 1, 2004 A.D., a proper SUBPOENA IN A CIVIL CASE was overdue for your Oath Office and Appointment Affidavit.
 
For your convenience, we have attached pertinent documentation.
 
Formal demand is hereby made of you to produce all missing credentials as itemized above no later than 5:00 p.m. on Friday, December 28, 2007 A.D.  Beyond that reasonable deadline, your silence will activate estoppel pursuant to Carmine v. Bowen, and it will also constitute fraud pursuant to U.S. v. Tweel.
 
Thank you for your timely and professional consideration.
 
 
Sincerely yours,
 
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell
 


On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 10:24 AM, FreedomWorks <info@...> wrote:

Thank you for contacting FreedomWorks. We will be in touch regarding your question or comment as soon as possible.



--





#17494 From: Supreme Law Firm <paulandrewmitchell2004@...>
Date: Tue Feb 7, 2012 7:08 pm
Subject: Re: THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA LIMITED is a corporation chartered in SCOTLAND!! This is willful misrepresentation (see McDade Act, 28 U.S.C. 530B)
paulandrewmi...
Send Email Send Email
 

----- Forwarded Message -----
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell <supremelawfirm@...>
Sent: Tuesday, February 7, 2012 11:01 AM
Subject:
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA LIMITED is a corporation chartered in SCOTLAND!!
This is willful misrepresentation (see McDade Act, 28 U.S.C. 530B)



http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/usa.inc/THE.UNITED.STATES.OF.AMERICA.LIMITED.JPG


Here's a very similar one chartered in Delaware:

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/usa.inc/THE.UNITED.STATES.OF.AMERICA.JPG


These 2 have been REVOKED by the Delaware SOS:

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/usa.inc/registered.agent.2007-02-12.gif
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/usa.corp/registered.agent.2007-02-12.gif


Here's "the rest of the story":

http://www.supremelaw.org/letters/us-v-usa.htm


http://www.supremelaw.org/sos/

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/williamson2/appeal/reply.to.brief.for.appellee.htm

The “government” did not bring this suit.  The U.S. Department of Justice has no powers of attorney legally to represent any one of the 50 States of the Union, nor all of them collectively.  28 U.S.C. 547.  The 50 States of the Union are already quite adequately represented legally by their respective State Attorneys General.  28 U.S.C. 530B.
Moreover, in Eisner v. Macomber, 252 U.S. 189 (1920), the Supreme Court prohibited Congress from re-defining any terms used in the Constitution for the United States of America (“U.S. Constitution”).  At 28 U.S.C. 1746, both “United States” and “United States of America” occur in correct contradistinction to each other (inside one is outside the others).  28 U.S.C. 1746 is the only statute in all of Title 28 where the term “United States of America” occurs as such.
The UNITED STATES OF AMERICA [sic] did incorporate twice as such in the State of Delaware, but certified evidence now before this Court shows that both foreign corporations have been revoked by the Delaware Secretary of State.  Neither foreign corporation was ever registered with the New Mexico Secretary of State either!  (See “Certificate”!)
Even if one or the other were not revoked, DOJ would still not have any powers of attorney legally to represent a foreign Delaware corporation.  Congress never appropriated funds for DOJ to do so.

Finally, Congress has never incorporated either the “United States” or the “United States of Americaas such.  See U.S. v. Cooper Corporation
, 312 U.S. 600 (1941).  It appears that Chief Justice John Marshall was responsible for fabricating the myth that “The United States of America” are a corporation.  See Dixon v. The United States, 1 Marsh. Dec. 177, 181 (1811).  However, without citing any actual legislative authority for that proposition, Marshall’s statement is merely dictum that was later cited in Bouvier’s Law Dictionary (1856), at the definitions of “Union” and “United States of America”.  In any event, Dixon has been overruled by Cooper supra because Dixon was decided by a Circuit Court in a case on which C.J. Marshall presided.
--
Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964
http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/agency/private.attorney.general.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/reading.list.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/index.htm (Home Page)
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.policy.htm (Support Policy)
http://www.supremelaw.org/guidelines.htm (Client Guidelines)
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.guidelines.htm (Policy + Guidelines)

All Rights Reserved without Prejudice
--


#17495 From: "BATR@..." <batr@...>
Date: Wed Feb 8, 2012 10:15 am
Subject: Negotium Business essay - Banking, Housing and Mortgages
sartre
Send Email Send Email
 

The primary players that caused the housing bubble are:

 

1) The banking institutions that bundled and sold very risky mortgages

 

2) The Wall Street firms that bought these instruments and hedged for a default hazard by booking speculative derivative insurance that could never pay off on massive defaults

 

3) Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac provided government backing, of last resort, on bad mortgages

 

Read the entire article

http://www.batr.org/negotium/020812.html

 

Discuss or comment about this essay on the BATR Forum

http://forum.batr.net/showthread.php?tid=2098

 

 


#17496 From: "John Perna" <JPerna@...>
Date: Tue Feb 7, 2012 2:10 pm
Subject: Ron Paul Song - END THIS WAR
jperna2
Send Email Send Email
 
 
THIS BRINGS TEARS TO MY EYES
 
Ron Paul 2012 Rap Song by Smiley Chris 
 
 
 
or
 
Here is what we are told that a lunatic wants:
Obeying The Constitution-
       keeping the oath that every President swears.
Sound money.
Freedom, liberty, and justice for ALL.
Peace.
No wars unless we are attacked,
          and then only when Congress declares war.
         (Who else can you trust to have his finger on the nuclear trigger?)
 
Protecting Our Own Borders.
End the Income Tax.
End the Federal Reserve.
No Entangling Alliances.
Minding our own business
Keeping our money at home to take care of our own needs.
Decrease our militarism in other countries. Stop conquest and nation building.
 
HERE IS WHAT ALL THE OTHER "SANE" CANDIDATES WANT:
 
United Nations resolutions,
          Agenda 21, NAFTA, World Trade Organization.
Indefinite detention of American citizens;
                without a charge, trial, or a lawyer.
Federal Reserve printing unlimited fiat paper money
Debt
Government control over everything
Government regulation of every aspect of life.
CONTINUOUS UNDECLARED WARS
Protecting Borders in other countries, but not our own.
HIGH Taxes of all types.
Entangling Alliances, Global Governance
Policing the world
Borrowing money from big dictatorships,
            and then giving it away to small dictatorships. 
Build a military base and colony on the moon, and make the moon the 51st state.
 
Newt Gingrich wants to build a colony on the Moon. OK, you say, but why? Well, he wants to be the first American to get divorced on the Moon. David Letterman
 
Maybe Newt can get some new income from the moon lobbyists? If dead people can vote,why not the men on the moon?

Obviously "lunatics" those who tell us that we should accept 'ANY' of the other candidate, other than Ron Paul.
 
We should be so lucky to have Ron Paul as our President. 
 
Ron Paul Song - END THIS WAR
Please visit the ultimate resource for defending liberty.

CLICK HERE:
 
If you get a message that says "address is not valid" then copy and paste the address into the address bar.
 
This is the Most Extensive Collection of Freedom Videos Ever Compiled:

John Perna
My email is:   
JPerna at sc.rr.com
which, if not censored, will show as: 
 
Are you looking for a book about defending liberty?
Many rare and out of print books are still available.
Look here:
 
Then look here:
 
 
 
If you get a message that says "address is not valid"
then copy and paste the address into the address bar.
Please Watch these videos: 
REAL EYE OPENERS. DOWN LOAD THEM NOW BEFORE THEY DISAPPEAR.
 
Invisible Empire - full version NWO video An absolutely amazing expose' of the power brokers of the world: No criminal tyrant left behind.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The American Dream - a very important video
http://tinyurl.com/USADream    (NOT CLICKABLE)
or
 
or
 
-----------
 
One Video that says it ALL - the VERY BEST
Ron Paul: The Only One We Can Trust
------------

A Day In The Park - coming soon

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sE6MKwW2nfQ  

------------
Ron Paul 2012 - Can you Hear us Now?
------------

To be removed from my address book,
reply to this message with the word remove or unsubscribe in the subject line.
 
To be added to my address book,
reply to this message with the word add in the subject line.
 
Send this to JPerna at sc.rr.com 
which, if not censored, will show as: 
 
V ~ For Victory
 
Ron Paul buttons and bumper stickers:
Ron Paul bumper sticker:
Ron Paul the Hope & Change You Wanted

10 pack of Ron Paul bumper stickers:
Ron Paul the Hope & Change You Wanted
 

===============
Ron Paul buttons:
Ron Paul the Hope & Change You Wanted

10 pack of 2.25″ metal, 2 color, buttons: 
 

 THE CORRUPT FEAR US.
THE HONEST SUPPORT US.
THE HEROIC JOIN US.
 
HERE IS your Free DISCOUNT Card FOR Prescription, Lab and Imaging. UP TO 75% OFF

#17497 From: Supreme Law Firm <paulandrewmitchell2004@...>
Date: Sun Feb 12, 2012 8:28 pm
Subject: Dedicated to America and the World TODAY -- FABULOUS Music Video: Michael McDonald - Sweet Freedom (1986)
paulandrewmi...
Send Email Send Email
 

----- Forwarded Message -----
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell <supremelawfirm@...>
Sent: Sunday, February 12, 2012 12:23 PM
Subject: Dedicated to America and the World TODAY -- FABULOUS Music Video: Michael McDonald - Sweet Freedom (1986)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=endscreen&NR=1&v=U-xetxYwyak

Sweet Freedom (1986) ... HOW SWEET IT IS!!

See comments too:

Gregory Hines and Billy Crystal are both hot!!!

You can see how real was the friendship between Billy and the great, late, Hynes.



Lyrics:

http://www.lyricstime.com/michael-mcdonald-sweet-freedom-lyrics.html

(Rod Temperton)

No more runnin' down the wrong road
Dancin' to a diff'rent drum
Can't you see what's goin' on
Deep inside your heart
Always searchin' for the real thing
Livin' like it's far away
Just leave all the madness in yesterday
You're holdin' the key
When you believe it

[Chorus:]

Shine sweet freedom
Shine your light on me
You are the magic
You're right where I wanna be
Oh sweet freedom carry me along
We'll keep the spirit alive on and on

We'll be dancin' in the moonlight

Smilin' with the risin' sun
Livin' like we've never done
Goin' all the way
Reachin' out to meet the changes
Touchin' every shining star
The light of tomorrow is right where we are
There's no turnin' back
From what I'm feeling

[Chorus]


Coz there'll be starlight all night

When we're close together
Share those feelings dancin' in your eyes
Tonight they're guiding us
Shinin' till the mornin' light


--
Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964
http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/agency/private.attorney.general.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/reading.list.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/index.htm (Home Page)
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.policy.htm (Support Policy)
http://www.supremelaw.org/guidelines.htm (Client Guidelines)
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.guidelines.htm (Policy + Guidelines)

All Rights Reserved without Prejudice



#17498 From: Supreme Law Firm <paulandrewmitchell2004@...>
Date: Sun Feb 12, 2012 9:34 pm
Subject: Dedicated to America and the World TODAY -- Jesus is Just Alright - Doobie Brothers in HD & stunning sound quality
paulandrewmi...
Send Email Send Email
 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SwbGjzF3mB0&feature=related

Performed by the Doobie Brothers in HD with stunning sound quality.

This is a gospel song written by Arthur Reynolds and first recorded by Reynold's own group, The Art Reynolds Singers, on their 1966 album, "Tellin' It Like It Is." The song's title makes use of the American slang term "all-right", which during the 1960s was used to describe something that was considered cool or very good.

The song was later recorded by The Doobie Brothers, who included it on their 1972 album, Toulouse Street, which - together with "Listen to the Music" - brought the band their breakthrough success.

The Doobie Brothers' version of "Jesus Is Just Alright" was one of a number of religiously themed songs to reach the U.S. charts during 1972 and 1973, along with "Morning Has Broken" by Cat Stevens, "Jubilation" by Paul Anka, "Speak to the Sky" by Rick Springfield, "Jesus Was a Capricorn" by Kris Kristofferson, and "I Knew Jesus (Before He Was a Star)" by Glen Campbell. Lyrics follow:

Jesus is just alright with me, Jesus is just alright, oh yeah
Jesus is just alright with me, Jesus is just alright.

I don't care what they may say, I don't care what they may do
I don't care what they may say, Jesus is just alright, oh yeah
Jesus is just alright.

Jesus is just alright with me, Jesus is just alright, oh yeah
Jesus is just alright with me, Jesus is just alright.

I don't care what they may know, I don't care where they may go
I don't care what they may know, Jesus is just alright, oh yeah.

Jesus, He's my friend, Jesus, He's my friend
He took me by the hand, led me far from this land
Jesus, He's my friend.

Jesus is just alright with me, Jesus is just alright, oh yeah
Jesus is just alright with me, Jesus is just alright.

I don't care what they may say, I don't care what they may do
I don't care what they may say, Jesus is just alright, oh yeah.
 
Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964(a)
http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/agency/private.attorney.general.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/reading.list.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/index.htm (Home Page)
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.policy.htm (Support Policy)
http://www.supremelaw.org/guidelines.htm (Client Guidelines)
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.guidelines.htm (Policy + Guidelines)

All Rights Reserved without Prejudice
----- Forwarded Message -----
From: Supreme Law Firm <paulandrewmitchell2004@...>
To: Paul Mitchell <paulandrewmitchell2004@...>
Sent: Sunday, February 12, 2012 12:28 PM
Subject: Dedicated to America and the World TODAY -- FABULOUS Music Video: Michael McDonald - Sweet Freedom (1986)


----- Forwarded Message -----
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell <supremelawfirm@...>
Sent: Sunday, February 12, 2012 12:23 PM
Subject: Dedicated to America and the World TODAY -- FABULOUS Music Video: Michael McDonald - Sweet Freedom (1986)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=endscreen&NR=1&v=U-xetxYwyak

Sweet Freedom (1986) ... HOW SWEET IT IS!!

See comments too:

Gregory Hines and Billy Crystal are both hot!!!

You can see how real was the friendship between Billy and the great, late, Hynes.



Lyrics:

http://www.lyricstime.com/michael-mcdonald-sweet-freedom-lyrics.html

(Rod Temperton)

No more runnin' down the wrong road
Dancin' to a diff'rent drum
Can't you see what's goin' on
Deep inside your heart
Always searchin' for the real thing
Livin' like it's far away
Just leave all the madness in yesterday
You're holdin' the key
When you believe it

[Chorus:]

Shine sweet freedom
Shine your light on me
You are the magic
You're right where I wanna be
Oh sweet freedom carry me along
We'll keep the spirit alive on and on

We'll be dancin' in the moonlight

Smilin' with the risin' sun
Livin' like we've never done
Goin' all the way
Reachin' out to meet the changes
Touchin' every shining star
The light of tomorrow is right where we are
There's no turnin' back
From what I'm feeling

[Chorus]


Coz there'll be starlight all night

When we're close together
Share those feelings dancin' in your eyes
Tonight they're guiding us
Shinin' till the mornin' light


--
Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964
http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/agency/private.attorney.general.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/reading.list.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/index.htm (Home Page)
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.policy.htm (Support Policy)
http://www.supremelaw.org/guidelines.htm (Client Guidelines)
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.guidelines.htm (Policy + Guidelines)

All Rights Reserved without Prejudice





#17499 From: Supreme Law Firm <paulandrewmitchell2004@...>
Date: Sun Feb 12, 2012 11:44 pm
Subject: We Miss You Terribly! Whitney Houston performs the greatest national anthem in sports history (video)
paulandrewmi...
Send Email Send Email
 
http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/nfl-shutdown-corner/;_ylt=AsiFISKS.9Bdgt53dI4WKVtYYsp_;_ylu=X3oDMTFobDU1NHRsBG1pdANCbG9ncyBCcmFuZGluZwRwb3MDMQRzZWMDTWVkaWFBcnRpY2xlQnJhbmRpbmc-;_ylg=X3oDMTNidmw0MmF1BGludGwDdXMEbGFuZwNlbi11cwRwc3RhaWQDMTYwYTA1OWUtOWFhNy0zYWM1LTgzNDItNDU1YWUzMDJlM2QwBHBzdGNhdANuZmx8c2h1dGRvd25jb3JuZXIEcHQDc3RvcnlwYWdlBHRlc3QD;_ylv=3

Ten days after the United States went to war in the Persian Gulf, Whitney Houston performed the greatest rendition of the Star Spangled Banner in sports history.

On Jan. 27, 1991, Houston took the field at Tampa Stadium prior to Super Bowl XXV to sing the national anthem.

The US was at war in Iraq and the game between the New York Giants and Buffalo Bills was serving as a welcome respite from the televised reports of scud bombs and cease fires.

The pop star had recorded the vocal weeks before in a Los Angeles studio and lip-synched the song at the Super Bowl, but few in the crowd of 73,000 or the 110 million watching at home seemed to notice.

Houston's gospel-infused performance and her soaring vocals, all set to the patriotic backdrop of flags and flyovers, are the standard against which all anthems are compared. It's as close to perfect as a human voice can get.
 
Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964(a)
http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/agency/private.attorney.general.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/reading.list.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/index.htm (Home Page)
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.policy.htm (Support Policy)
http://www.supremelaw.org/guidelines.htm (Client Guidelines)
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.guidelines.htm (Policy + Guidelines)

All Rights Reserved without Prejudice

#17500 From: Supreme Law Firm <paulandrewmitchell2004@...>
Date: Mon Feb 13, 2012 5:31 am
Subject: IRS is now admitting that "The Federal Zone" is correct, on a dramatically significant point!
paulandrewmi...
Send Email Send Email
 

----- Forwarded Message -----
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell <supremelawfirm@...>
Sent: Sunday, February 12, 2012 9:27 PM
Subject: IRS is now admitting that "The Federal Zone" is correct, on a dramatically significant point!

This only took them 20 YEARS to admit, however: 
that book was first published in March 1992:  how time flies!

Very VERY  interesting:  here, the IRS is almost admitting, officially,
that "The Federal Zone" is correct on this dramatically significant point!

http://www.supremelaw.org/fedzone11/htm/chapter9.htm

An extremely subtle indicator of one's status is the perjury oath which is found on IRS forms.  Under Title 28 of the U.S. Code, Section 1746, there are two different perjury oaths to which penalties attach:  one within the United States**, and one without the United States** (see Appendix R for the precise wording of 28 U.S.C. 1746).  If an oath is executed without the United States**, it reads as follows:
 
      I declare ... under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct.
 
[emphasis added]
 
If an oath is executed within the United States**, it reads as follows:
 
      I declare ... that the foregoing is true and correct.
 
Thus, your signature under the latter oath can be presumed to mean that you are already subject to the jurisdiction of the United States**.  This latter oath is the one found on IRS Form 1040.


The following text is slightly in error (see section 1746(1) above,
for the correct text):

http://www.irs.gov/foia/article/0,,id=211443,00.html#proof

To Establish Proof of Identity and Right to Access

Presenting a sworn statement as to your identity, under penalty of perjury
(You may include in your FOIA request
"I declare under penalty of perjury of the laws of the United States of America [sic]
that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on [date]. I am [your name] and I am requesting….
")


[end quote]


See also the Answer to Question #16 in our 31Q&A:

http://www.supremelaw.org/sls/31answers.htm#Q16



"The Federal Zone" electronic 11th edition is here:

http://www.supremelaw.org/fedzone11/


BTW:  we are no longer selling hard copies without the author's autograph
and private embossing seal:

http://www.supremelaw.org/fedzone11/order.htm




Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964(a)
http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/agency/private.attorney.general.htm
Criminal Investigator and Federal Witness: 18 U.S.C. 1510, 1512-13


On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 9:14 PM, Joseph  wrote:

That text came off the IRS website so I suspect it is misleading. 
 
See:  http://www.irs.gov/foia/article/0,,id=211443,00.html#proof





#17501 From: "BATR@..." <batr@...>
Date: Mon Feb 13, 2012 2:09 pm
Subject: BATR Inherent Autonomy essay - Obama's War on the Catholic Church
sartre
Send Email Send Email
 

The pathetic attack on religious freedom and the sanctity of individual conscience is a shot heard round the planet. The social desecration that surrounds this immoral culture has a defamed religious czar, named Barack Hussein Obama. Kathleen Sebelius, secretary of Health and Human service is a disgrace. She acts as the High Priestess of the Church for the Police State. No matter what your opinion is of the Catholic Church, one practice surely shows the wisdom of the faith. Women are not ordained as priests.

 

All the bluster about women's reproductive rights misses the nature of the issue. America was created as a nation to guarantee religious freedom. According to the gospel of Obama, his bishops wear skirts and jack boots. By ordering an unconstitutional dictate, Sebelius' heretical doctrine views the First Amendment as expendable. History repeats itself.

 

Read the entire article on the BATR archive page

http://batr.org/autonomy/021212.html

 

Discuss or comment about this essay on the BATR Forum

http://forum.batr.net/showthread.php?tid=2118

 


#17502 From: Supreme Law Firm <paulandrewmitchell2004@...>
Date: Tue Feb 14, 2012 3:56 pm
Subject: Checking for "DNS Changer" Malware on Windows XP + FBI Receives Court Order to Impose Targeted Internet Takeover on March 8th
paulandrewmi...
Send Email Send Email
 

----- Forwarded Message -----
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell <supremelawfirm@...>
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2012 7:53 AM
Subject:
Checking for "DNS Changer" Malware on Windows XP
+ FBI Receives Court Order to Impose Targeted Internet Takeover on March 8th


http://www.activistpost.com/2012/02/fbi-receives-court-order-to-impose.html

http://dcwg.org/checkup.html



Did you write down your DNS Settings?

If you followed these instructions, you should have written down your current DNS settings.

Are you safe?

If your computers' DNS settings use the follow ranges, then you likely have been affected by the DNS Changer viruses.

Between this IP...... and this IP
77.67.83.177.67.83.254
85.255.112.185.255.127.254
67.210.0.167.210.15.254
93.188.160.193.188.167.254
213.109.64.1213.109.79.254
64.28.176.164.28.191.254


If you're not sure how to read these numbers, you can use a handy form on the FBI information page,
to see if your computer is affected.


NOTE:

If you are using a home wifi network, it might be that your computer is ok,
but your home router is infected, and has passed on the bad DNS settings to your desktop or laptop.

Be sure to check the "Home Routers" instructions link to see if that's the case.


--
Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964
http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/agency/private.attorney.general.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/reading.list.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/index.htm (Home Page)
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.policy.htm (Support Policy)
http://www.supremelaw.org/guidelines.htm (Client Guidelines)
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.guidelines.htm (Policy + Guidelines)

All Rights Reserved without Prejudice



#17503 From: "John Perna" <JPerna@...>
Date: Sat Feb 11, 2012 7:09 am
Subject: FBI says paying for your morning coffee with cash a potential terrorist activity urges coffee shop owners to report cash-paying customers to authorities.
jperna2
Send Email Send Email
 
 

FBI says paying for your morning coffee with cash a potential terrorist activity urges coffee shop owners to report cash-paying customers to authorities.

 
JUST WHO DO THEY CALL CONSPIRACY NUTS?  
 
 
WOULD THAT BE LIKE PEOPLE WHO SAY THAT YOU ARE A TERRORIST IF YOU PAY CASH FOR COFFEE? THEY CALL THIS "INTELLIGENCE"?
 
 
Thought Criminals Beware! The FBI is training local police on dealing with unauthorized thoughts. Thought Crime is a very subtle thing. As hard as you try to avoid unauthorized thoughts, without warning you could wind up being a thought criminal.
if you do not understand these concepts you should 
 
 
WATCH IT HERE:
OR HERE:
 

WHEN YOU SEE THE CRIMINALIZATION OF THE DEFENSE OF LIBERTY YOU ARE NO LONGER ON THE WAY TO TYRANNY. YOU ALREADY HAVE TYRANNY.  

Last Pillar of tyranny here now: Thought crime criminalization of belief in Liberty

http://targetfreedom.com/books/last-pillar-of-tyranny-here-now-thought-crime-criminalization-of-belief-in-liberty/ 

http://targetfreedom.typepad.com/targetfreedom/2009/03/last-pillar-of-tyranny.html

STEP ONE: DEMONIZATION
STEP TWO: LIQUIDATION

YOUR LIFE DEPENDS ON PREVENTING DEMONIZATION. PREVENT DEMONIZATION BY POSTING THIS MESSAGE. WE SHOW HOW IDIOTIC THEY ARE AND CREATE PUBLIC OPPOSITION.

THIS IS A PUBLIC RELATIONS CONTEST:
PATRIOTS WIN: LIBERTY SURVIVES.
TYRANTS WIN: PATRIOTS DIE.

PLEASE PASS THIS ON!

 
FBI warns of threat from anti-government extremists

By Patrick Temple-West

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Anti-government extremists opposed to taxes and regulations pose a growing threat to local law enforcement officers in the United States, the FBI warned on Monday.

These extremists, sometimes known as "sovereign citizens," believe they can live outside any type of government authority, FBI agents said at a news conference.

The extremists may refuse to pay taxes, defy government environmental regulations and believe the United States went bankrupt by going off the gold standard.

Routine encounters with police can turn violent "at the drop of a hat," said Stuart McArthur, deputy assistant director in the FBI's counterterrorism division.

"We thought it was important to increase the visibility of the threat with state and local law enforcement," he said.

In May 2010, two West Memphis, Arkansas, police officers were shot and killed in an argument that developed after they pulled over a "sovereign citizen" in traffic.

Last year, an extremist in Texas opened fire on a police officer during a traffic stop. The officer was not hit.

Legal convictions of such extremists, mostly for white-collar crimes such as fraud, have increased from 10 in 2009 to 18 each in 2010 and 2011, FBI agents said.

"We are being inundated right now with requests for training from state and local law enforcement on sovereign-related matters," said Casey Carty, an FBI supervisory special agent.

FBI agents said they do not have a tally of people who consider themselves "sovereign citizens."

J.J. MacNab, a former tax and insurance expert who is an analyst covering the sovereign movement, has estimated that it has about 100,000 members.

Sovereign members often express particular outrage at tax collection, putting Internal Revenue Service employees at risk.

Who will protect us from our Protectors?

The "Police State" Special Edition Issue of The New American magazine. (Fall/Winter 1994)
 

 


http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B003KPDTVO?ie=UTF8&seller=A1AVPSERX4QF0E&sn=jperna12 

The cover shows an ATF agent, in camouflage, and carrying an assault rifle. He is wearing sun glasses, and has a piece of tape over his badge number.

Why is this happening?

Watch the "training" of your police, by your federal government:

Feds Slander Christians, founding fathers and homeschoolers as terrorists.

Fed training video: Christian and founding fathers called terrorists
The lecturer identifies George Washington, Thomas Jefferson and other founding fathers as terrorists.
 
OUR TAX DOLLARS AT WORK!!!
 

FBI Attempts to Make 'Libertarians' the Poster Children for Domestic Extremism

http://www.activistpost.com/2012/02/fbi-attempts-to-make-libertarians.html
 
Eric Blair
As the definition of a domestic extremist continues to expand to include activists for peace, animal rights, currency, natural health, liberty and other noble causes, the FBI is ready to make an example out of one group in particular: Libertarians.

The FBI held a press conference Monday to "increase the visibility of the threat" that people who oppose taxes and regulations, government intrusions into their private property, and the desire for sound money allegedly pose to local authorities.
Although the FBI vaguely attempts to label this group as "sometimes known as 'sovereign citizens'", the description sounds an awful lot like me, and millions of other liberty-minded people in America that don't associate with any group.
They also sound like Ron Paul supporters.
 
The County Sheriff: America's Last Hope (Paperback) by Sheriff Richard Mack

http://americanistbookstore.com/books/county-sheriff-americas-last-hope/

 
 
Sheriff Mack's latest staplebound paperback booklet covers decades of research to prove once and for all that the sheriffs in this country are indeed the ultimate law authority in their respective jurisdictions. The sheriff absolutely has the power and responsibility to defend his citizens against all enemies, including those from our own Federal Government. History, case law, common law and common sense all show clear evidence that the sheriff is the people's protector in all issues of injustice and is responsible for keeping the peace in all matters. He is the last line of defense for his constituents; he is America's last hope to regain our forgotten freedom. This short but powerful staplebound paperback booklet is a must read for all citizens, sheriffs, and government officials that we may all work to return America to the constitutional republic she was meant to be. Amazing as it might be, the sheriff can make this happen!
 
According to Reuters:

Anti-government extremists opposed to taxes and regulations pose a growing threat to local law enforcement officers in the United States, the FBI warned on Monday.

These extremists, sometimes known as 'sovereign citizens,' believe they can live outside any type of government authority, FBI agents said at a news conference.

The extremists may refuse to pay taxes, defy government environmental regulations and believe the United States went bankrupt by going off the gold standard.

Notice the resolute use of the word "extremists" but the vague description "sometimes known as sovereign citizens."  Yet the description that these "extremists may refuse to pay taxes and defy government environmental regulations" sounds more like General Electric than average liberty activists who the FBI clearly seems hellbent on demonizing.

Additionally, the
official mission for Sovereign Citizens is to "Protect Property Rights and American Civil Liberties."  As fierce protectors of property rights, they take environmental damage quite seriously.  Many would argue that an environmental policy governed by property rights is far more effective than the bloated EPA which is wholly owned by corporate polluters.

"Sovereign members often express particular outrage at tax collection, putting Internal Revenue Service employees at risk," Reuters assumes.  Yet, choosing not to pay taxes is by definition a form of
non-violent civil disobedience.  And no credible threats against individual IRS agents were cited.

Opposing taxes only seems dangerous to those who wish to perpetuate this prison society.  I would even suggest that it's far more dangerous to continue to fund an organization who wages murderous wars abroad based on lies, who builds a militarized police state at home, who removes all individual liberty in the name of safety, and who bails out criminal cartels while the innocent suffer.  The real extremists would seem to be the ones who support such a blood-thirsty organization, not the people who oppose its wicked ways.
 
But the FBI does their best to convince us that that sovereign citizens are dangerous extremists by warning us they can turn violent "at the drop of a hat," as Stuart McArthur, assistant director in the FBI's counterterrorism division, said at the press conference.

As evidence, McArthur refers to one incident where two men claiming to be Sovereign Citizens killed two Arkansas policemen after an argument.  Because this isolated and highly suspect incident is hardly worthy of labeling an entire philosophical group as violent, McArthur desperately tries to dignify the reason for the FBI's alert with other, even more vague examples:
Last year, an extremist in Texas opened fire on a police officer during a traffic stop. The officer was not hit.

Legal convictions of such extremists, mostly for white-collar crimes such as fraud, have increased from 10 in 2009 to 18 each in 2010 and 2011, FBI agents said.
Eighteen "such extremists" convicted of white collar fraud! That's all you can produce with an $8 billion FBI budget?  And you wonder why people think their taxes may be better spent elsewhere?

The FBI and the Reuter's reporter must have forgotten to check the Sovereign Citizens' own website to see their very clear statement in complete disagreement to all allegations made in this article:
We do NOT endorse non-payment of taxes or violence to achieve these changes. We do NOT endorse giving up a social security number and we do NOT endorse violence against the police or the government.
But recently, the feds somehow excused the use of a domestic drone of all things in the arrest of farmers accused of stealing a handful of cattle because the farmers were said to be Sovereign Citizens.

It appears the federal government is trying to make an enemy out of non-violent activists, especially liberty activists.  Imagine, people concerned with peace and liberty are the enemy of the FBI.  What's the opposite of peace and liberty?  War and tyranny.  Which side are you on?
 
The Proper Role of Law Enforcement by  Sheriff Richard Mack
http://americanistbookstore.com/books/proper-role-of-law-enforcement/
 
 
What every citizen should know. What every cop should believe. "To serve and protect" - This time-honored mission statement of American law enforcement is steadily giving way in police departments all across the nation to an ethos of intimidation, military-style siege, and disdain for citizens' rights. Richard Mack - the man who as sheriff of a rural Arizona county fought the Brady Bill gun-control law all the way to the Supreme Court and won - gives us an insider's glimpse into the pervasive forces that are relentlessly driving America towards a police state. In almost confessional style, he recounts how he came to realize, while working as a beat cop, how wrong the all-too-common orientation of police officers is when they think of their job as being "to write tickets and arrest people." Richard Mack tells of his personal transformation from "by-the-numbers" cop to constitution-conscious defender of citizens' rights and freedoms. This book is a wake-up call for all law-enforcement officers. It is a must-read for every man and woman wearing a badge. If you have a friend or relative in law enforcement, make sure you get a copy into their hands. You'll be shocked to learn just how far American law enforcement has strayed from its mission.
 
 
http://www.naturalnews.com/034908_FBI_coffee_shops_terrorism.html 
 

FBI says paying for your morning coffee with cash a potential terrorist activity urges coffee shop owners to report cash-paying customers to authorities.

 
JUST WHO DO THEY CALL CONSPIRACY NUTS?  
 
 
WOULD THAT BE LIKE PEOPLE WHO SAY THAT YOU ARE A TERRORIST IF YOU PAY CASH FOR COFFEE?
 
RELATED ACTIVIST POST ARTICLE:
25 FBI Reports That Can Put You on the Terror Watch List
 
Anonymous 
Activist Post

A concerted effort has been afoot for some time to merge local police with federal authorities to respond to the implementation of citizen spy "snitch" programs. This has been best illustrated by the role of threat fusion centers, which are integrating data from public and private sources alike -- even universities.

The FBI has now made public their "Communities Against Terrorism" Suspicious Activity Reporting flyers.

I myself have seen documents like this as a former retail store owner.  One day, roughly 10 years ago, I received a flyer in my mailbox informing our establishment that we were to submit a "Suspicious Activity Report" for anyone paying with large amounts of cash (I believe it was $2,000 or more at the time).  I proceeded to throw it directly into the garbage where it belonged. I did inform my clients, though, rather than inform the "authorities" as I was directed. However, these SAR's have clearly become much more widespread than my tiny retail shop, infiltrating nearly every facet of life in America.

Listed below are all 25 known flyers that should be read in their entirety if one wishes to discover just how far the United States has traveled in its attempt to replicate a level of citizen snitches not seen since the Stasi of East Germany.

I have included a very short summary of each .PDF, with an embedded link in the title,  to serve as a general guide of who is a potential terrorist suspect.

Let us never forget that this system of control needs our cooperation if it is to succeed.  We have to accept personal responsibility for how much further this slide toward tyranny is going to take us; and that starts by getting informed, and informing others of the extent of their plan.
  1. Airport Service Providers -- Includes on-craft providers: baggage, cleaners, cargo, catering, mechanics, ground crew, food service, cleaners, security, taxi, limos, and shuttles.
  2. Beauty/Drug Suppliers -- People who have burn marks, missing limbs, travel a long distance, nervous, who are picked up, make illogical requests (even of consumer-grade products).
  3. Bulk Fuel Distributors -- New customers not from the area, those using cash for large transactions, nervous, large purchases, having a rental vehicle.
  4. Construction Sites -- People with environmental slogans and/or anti-government slogans, banners or signs that threaten or imply violence.
  5. Dive/Boat Shops -- New customers reluctant to provide complete personal information, customer who does not have certification, using cash for expensive transactions, extended rentals, appearing uninterested in safety rules, experiencing guarded behavior.
  6. Electronics Stores -- Person who alters appearance from visit to visit (changing hair color, shaving, etc.), fills a "shopping list" of components while lacking knowledge about their use. Pays cash for large purchases.
  7. Farm Supply Stores -- New customers not from the area, nervous or impatient, suspicious inquiries regarding equipment specifications, failing to state legitimate use for supplies, rental vehicle, cash for large transactions.
  8. Financial Institutions -- No evidence for legitimate business activity, those with multiple accounts, banks, parties, and jurisdictions (layering).  Mixed deposits (money orders, third-party checks, and/or payroll into a business account).  Large volume of wire transfers, or repetitive patterns, shell entities, "pass through" points by foreign jurisdictions.
  9. General Aviation -- Taking flying lessons but appear uninterested, renting under vague reasons for doing so, requests to fly over specific locations without substantiated reason, taking pictures or videos of potentially sensitive locations, actions outside the norm, parking near the perimeter of airport, asking questions without substantiation.
  10. General Public -- Basically everything exhibited by those with an inquisitive nature: questions, note taking, drawing, annotating maps, inappropriate photos or videos, people in places where they do not belong.
  11. Hobby Shops -- Interest in remote-controlled aircraft, interest that does not seem genuine, possessing little knowledge of purchase, exhibiting unusual interest, exhibiting no interest, using cash for large transactions.
  12. Home Improvement and Large Retail Stores -- Large quantity of ammunition, firearms and ammunition out of season, combination of unusual items, interest in night vision and camouflage apparel, purchases of pipe fittings and supplies, rental vehicle, refusal to complete firearms paperwork, using cash for large transactions.
  13. Hotels/Motels -- There is an excellent discussion of this section in Michael Snyder's recent article.
  14. Internet Cafes -- There is an excellent discussion of this section in Michael Snyder's recent  article.
  15. Shopping Malls -- Wearing backpacks, discreet use of cameras, note-taking, or video over an extended period, several men arriving together then splitting up, continuing to communicate (dry run?), speaking to security guards, comments regarding radical theology, vague or cryptic warnings, or anti-U.S. sentiments that appear out of place and provocative.
  16. Martial Arts/Paintball -- Insist on paying with cash, travels long distance to participate, interest in learning offensive moves in a confined space, learning the use of hidden weapons, learning kill and restraint techniques with no occupational need, group training, uttering racist, religious, unusual, anti-US, or vague and cryptic warnings, close combat training, paintball tactics of ambush or kidnapping scenarios, operating a private facility, converting large plots of rural land to conduct these activities.
  17. Mass Transportation -- Altering one's appearance, exhibiting burns, bleached body hair, concealed wires, nervous, actions suggesting use of a hidden camera, unusual comments, questioning security/facility personnel via normal means of communication, groups arriving together then splitting up and communicating via cell phone.
  18. Military Surplus -- Demanding identity privacy, insisting on paying with cash, suspicious comments, bulk purchases.
  19. Peroxide Explosives -- Unknown customer, individual requesting more information.
  20. Recognizing Sleepers -- Arrival from countries where violent militant Islamic groups are known to operate, long unexplained absences, fury at the West for reasons ranging from personal problems to global policies of the U.S., conspiracy theories about Westerners (e.g. the CIA arranged for 9/11 to legitimize the invasion of foreign lands), accusing the West of trying to destroy Islam.
  21. Rental Cars -- Reluctance to provide complete personal information, using cash, unusual questions.
  22. Rental Properties -- Using cash for large transactions, inquiries about local sites, refusing maintenance or service over extended time, not using property for intended purpose, unusual number of package deliveries, unusual amounts of traffic, discovery of unusual items.
  23. Rental Trucks -- Reluctance to provide personal information, cash for large transactions, inquiries about renting a truck with a wooden floor, questions about vehicle specifications.
  24. Storage Facilities -- Failing to provide complete personal information, using cash to pay fees in advance, placing unusual items in storage, disposing of tools, gloves, masks, or clothing, discarding clothes or shoes in new condition, avoiding contact with rental facility personnel, accessing facility an unusual number of times, storing items that emit unusual odors or leak liquids.
  25. Tattoo Shops -- Demanding identity "privacy," paying cash, altering appearance (beard, hair style, hair color, style of dress, etc.), making racist or extreme statements, suspicious comments that suggest or appear to endorse violence in support of a cause, repeated returns with multiple individuals requesting identical tattoos, inquiries about unusual methods of tattooing or placement which could allow the concealment of extremist symbols.
These flyers also state an additional note about how you can be a part of the solution:
  • Require a valid ID of all new customers.
  • Keep records of purchases.
  • Talk to customers, ask questions, and listen to and observe their responses.
  • Make note of suspicious statements, people and/or vehicles.
  • If something seems wrong, notify law enforcement authorities.
As a former store owner in one of the categories above (and a martial arts practitioner), I suggest that you completely disregard the suggestions of these reports.  Instead, I would urge common sense, reliance upon your innate "gut instincts" that nature has provided as a tool to determine what is truly wrong beyond these catch-all guidelines.  And, lastly, realize that preventing terrorism is not a "community effort" under the direction of bloated bureaucrats and their overlords. Preventing terrorism, whether State-sponsored via false flag or legitimate, should be the role of each individual's power of discernment. It's more efficient, more honest, and more effective.

It is the utmost duty of individuals to speak out against unsubstantiated fear mongering and the usurpation of power based on upon exaggerated threats. These exaggerated threats are often designed to lead to a paranoid culture that can be easily swayed by manipulated emotions instead of critical thinking. Furthermore, violence, coercion, and threats of consequences for non-cooperation with State dictates are the hallmarks of historical tyranny.

Finally, let's not forget what the mere accusation of terrorism means in today's world: indefinite detention without a trial, torture, and the end of our unalienable rights.

Follow the above official State guidelines for reporting "potential terrorism" at your peril.
WHAT THIS ACTUALLY IS:
A SHOPPING LIST OF EXCUSES TO ARREST INNOCENT PEOPLE.
TRANSLATION - ARREST ANYONE GOVERNMENT DOES NOT LIKE.
THEN PICK AN EXCUSE FROM THIS IDIOTIC LIST OF JUSTIFICATIONS.

Source:
http://publicintelligence.net/fbi-suspicious-activity-reporting-flyers/

Please help us combat censorship: vote for this story on Reddit:  http://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/pd2p2/25_reports_that_can_put_you_on_the_terror_watch/

 http://www.reddit.com/r/Libertarian/comments/pephr/fbi_attempts_to_make_libertarians_the_poster/

THIS ARTICLE IS ALSO POSTED AT:
http://targetfreedom.typepad.com/targetfreedom/2012/02/fbi-clampdown-on-thought-crime.html
 
FOLLOW UP ARTICLES:

Profiling and Criminalizing Political Dissent

http://targetfreedom.com/cfr/profiling-and-criminalizing-political-dissent/ 
 

Last Pillar of tyranny here now: Thought crime criminalization of belief in Liberty

http://targetfreedom.com/books/last-pillar-of-tyranny-here-now-thought-crime-criminalization-of-belief-in-liberty/ 

 
 
UNDERSTANDING THE PROBLEM IS THE FIRST, AND MOST IMPORTANT STEP,
TO BECOMING MOTIVATED TO TAKE ACTION.
UNDERSTANDING THE PROBLEM IS ALSO ESSENTIAL NOT BEING DUPED TO SERVE THE TYRANNY.
PREVENTING PEOPLE FROM BEING DUPED TO SERVE THE TYRANNY,
WILL DEFEAT DEMONIZATION, ALL BY ITSELF, IF IT IS DONE ON LARGE ENOUGH SCALE.
BUT UNDERSTANDING THE PROBLEM WILL AUTOMATICALLY RESULT IN SOME AMOUNT OF RECRUITMENT TO ACTION.
ONE THING IS CERTAIN: THERE WILL BE ABSOLUTELY NO RECRUITMENT TO ACTION WITHOUT UNDERSTANDING THE PROBLEM.
 
Please visit the ultimate resource for defending liberty.

CLICK HERE:
 
If you get a message that says "address is not valid" then copy and paste the address into the address bar.
 
This is the Most Extensive Collection of Freedom Videos Ever Compiled:

John Perna
My email is:   
JPerna at sc.rr.com
which, if not censored, will show as: 
 
Are you looking for a book about defending liberty?
Many rare and out of print books are still available.
Look here:
 
Then look here:
 
 
 
If you get a message that says "address is not valid"
then copy and paste the address into the address bar.
Please Watch these videos: 
REAL EYE OPENERS. DOWN LOAD THEM NOW BEFORE THEY DISAPPEAR.
 
Invisible Empire - full version NWO video An absolutely amazing expose' of the power brokers of the world: No criminal tyrant left behind.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The American Dream - a very important video
http://tinyurl.com/USADream    (NOT CLICKABLE)
or
 
or
 
-----------
 
One Video that says it ALL - the VERY BEST
Ron Paul: The Only One We Can Trust
------------

A Day In The Park - coming soon

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sE6MKwW2nfQ  

------------
Ron Paul 2012 - Can you Hear us Now?
------------

To be removed from my address book,
reply to this message with the word remove or unsubscribe in the subject line.
 
To be added to my address book,
reply to this message with the word add in the subject line.
 
Send this to JPerna at sc.rr.com 
which, if not censored, will show as: 
 
V ~ For Victory
 
Ron Paul buttons and bumper stickers:
Ron Paul bumper sticker:
Ron Paul the Hope & Change You Wanted

10 pack of Ron Paul bumper stickers:
Ron Paul the Hope & Change You Wanted
 

===============
Ron Paul buttons:
Ron Paul the Hope & Change You Wanted

10 pack of 2.25″ metal, 2 color, buttons: 
 

 THE CORRUPT FEAR US.
THE HONEST SUPPORT US.
THE HEROIC JOIN US.
 
HERE IS your Free DISCOUNT Card FOR Prescription, Lab and Imaging. UP TO 75% OFF

#17504 From: Supreme Law Firm <paulandrewmitchell2004@...>
Date: Tue Feb 14, 2012 12:20 pm
Subject: Re: Killing the Constitution + Ruth Bader Ginsburg has no PRESIDENTIAL COMMISSION
paulandrewmi...
Send Email Send Email
 

----- Forwarded Message -----
From: Supreme Law Firm <paulandrewmitchell2004@...>
To: Phil Holtz <philholtz54@...>
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2012 4:19 AM
Subject: Re: Killing the Constitution + Ruth Bader Ginsburg has no PRESIDENTIAL COMMISSION

Ginsburg has no PRESIDENTIAL COMMISSION:

http://www.supremelaw.org/copyrite/ginsburg/foia.request.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/copyrite/ginsburg/foia.appeal.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/copyrite/ginsburg/letter.2004-02-12.gif  <--- DOJ's admission here
http://www.supremelaw.org/copyrite/ginsburg/nad.missing.credentials.htm

Authorities:
http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions.htm

 
Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964(a)
http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/agency/private.attorney.general.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/reading.list.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/index.htm (Home Page)
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.policy.htm (Support Policy)
http://www.supremelaw.org/guidelines.htm (Client Guidelines)
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.guidelines.htm (Policy + Guidelines)

All Rights Reserved without Prejudice


From: Phil Holtz <philholtz54@...>
To:
Sent: Monday, February 13, 2012 11:21 PM
Subject: Fw: Killing the Constitution


 

 
Key article----scroll down to      FEMA CAMPS
http://www.trueorthodox.com/pictures/killconjew.jpg
KILLING THE CONSTITUTION
JEWISH STYLE

By Brother Nathanael Kapner, Copyright 2012
http://www.trueorthodox.com/pictures/tbnfrzn.jpg
http://www.trueorthodox.com/pictures/jewconkill.jpg
A FEATURE ARTICLEin the Jewish-owned New York Times entitled, “We the People Loses Appeal,” was published on February 6 2012.
The piece, which trashes the US Constitution, was written by Jewish lawyer, Adam Liptak, the Supreme Court correspondent of the New York Times.
Hiding behind his theme that our Republic’s time-honored document is supposedly falling out of favor around the globe, Litpak attacks the US Constitution as being “terse and old.”
Liptak expands his assault by giving numerous reasons justifying the Constitution’s supposed “waning influence.”
The following distillation of “We the People Loses Appeal” outlines Liptak’s main attacks on the US Constitution that evinces a Jewish, anti-American, communist agenda:
http://www.trueorthodox.com/pictures/insertal1.jpg The US Constitution Has Idiosyncrasies Such As The 2nd Amendment
Here, Liptak insults and disparages those who prize their right to bear arms for having as their “brothers in arms” trigger-happy hooligans from “Mexico and Guatemala.”
Apparently, Liptak’s aim, in concert with organized Jewry, is to strip the “goyim” of their guns.
http://www.trueorthodox.com/pictures/insertal1.jpg The Canadian Charter Is Superior To The US Constitution
Here, Liptak attacks the US Constitution for “not allowing” (as the Canadian Charter does allow) for “affirmative action.”
Well, of course! Liptak, like his fellow Jews, with the ADL at the lead, who pushed Affirmative Action Legislation, is hell-bent on eradicating the White Middle Class in order for Jewry, a super-wealthy minority, to take control of a two-tiered society: Jews and a lower class. (This is *Jewry’s* agenda. It’s important that whites, blacks, and hispanics understand this.)
http://www.trueorthodox.com/pictures/insertal1.jpg The Bill Of Rights Is No Better Than What Banana Republics Offer
As prominent author, Dr Kevin MacDonald, points out, organized Jewry opposes free speech in order to suppress criticism of Jewry’s overweening influence in America.
http://www.trueorthodox.com/pictures/insertal1.jpg The US Constitution Is A Poor Model For Other Nations
Here, Liptak is quoting his fellow traitorous Jew, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who sits on the bench of the Supreme Court of the United States.
http://www.trueorthodox.com/pictures/haterp.jpgIn a recent visit to Egypt, Ginsberg advised the leaders “not to use the US Constitution as a model” when “penning” their own government document.
Two other Jews, whose oath to protect the US Constitution is doubtful given their Jewish sympathies, share with Ginsberg (and likely, her disloyalty to the Constitution), this powerful seat. View Entire Story Here, Here, & Here.
No wonder then that organized Jewry hates Ron Paul—America’s foremost champion of the US Constitution.
For even if Ron Paul wins every primary and caucus yet to come the Jew-owned press would be loath to even mention his name.
http://www.trueorthodox.com/pictures/levinkillcon11.jpg
THE DEATH OF THE CONSTITUTION occurred while Americans were drinking themselves into a stupor on New Year’s Eve, 2011/2012.
This is the date that Jewry’s “schwartza in the White House,” Barack Obama, signed the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) into law.
And why did the majority of Democrat and Republican senators and congressmen vote for this law? Because both political parties are directed by Jews.
Any hope for “change” in our Jew-occupied government is like a starving man dreaming he is dining at a sumptuous meal but when he wakes up he’s still hungry.
The sole-sponsor of the law was Senator Carl Levin, a Jew, and head of the Senate Armed Services Committee. (How did a Jew land this chair…money?)
Levin’s NDAA legislation authorizes in Section 1021 the US military to imprison US citizens for life…without charges, without recourse to trial, and without notification to family and kin.
http://www.trueorthodox.com/pictures/habcorpse.jpgThis treasonous, Jew-inspired law destroys once and for all the Constitutional right of the “privilege” of habeas corpus which guarantees the right to be “released” from prison if one believes the arrest was made without legal merit.
Sadly, because the US military is dependent on Jewish Financial Capital — which underwrites and influences the armaments industry as well as owns the Federal Reserve Bank — for its funding, there is little chance that US Generals will bite the hand that feeds them and allow their soldiers to defend American citizens’ Constitutional rights in opposition to Levin’s treasonous NDAA.
http://www.trueorthodox.com/pictures/liebfema1.jpgACTING IN CONCERT with his fellow Jew and traitor is Senator Joseph Lieberman who chairs the Senate Committee for Homeland Security. (How did a Jew land this powerful seat…money?)
In October 2011, Lieberman introduced his Enemy Expatriation Act which would permanently strip an American of his citizenship without conviction if suspected of “supporting hostilities” against the “homeland.” (Translate, “jewland.”)
IT ALL BOILS DOWN TO THIS: Jews in power hate our freedoms.
If we allow organized Jewry to pursue their path of wanton destruction of our civil liberties we will soon experience what 66 million martyred Orthodox Christians suffered under the Jewish-led Bolshevik Revolution.
And I’m not talking about a “nice life” with fries and ketchup in Lieberman’s soon-to-be-opened FEMA camps.
http://www.trueorthodox.com/pictures/tbnfrzn2.jpg
Support The Brother Nathanael Foundation!

Online donation system by ClickandPledge
Or Send Your Contribution To:
The Brother Nathanael Foundation, PO Box 1242, Frisco CO 80443
E-mail: brothernathanaelfoundation@...
___________________________________
 
 











#17505 From: "BATR@..." <batr@...>
Date: Wed Feb 15, 2012 12:15 pm
Subject: Negotium Business essay - David Stockman's Viewpoint on the Obama Budget Disaster
sartre
Send Email Send Email
 

Passing a Federal Budget is a rarity, especially under the administration of a committed Marxist. The Democratic Senate’s strangle hold on bringing up legislation, particularly a budget, goes without saying. What makes this new budget for 2013 any different? This time the day of reckoning hits hard the first of the next year. The recent interview with David Stockman on the Fox Business channel with Neil Cavuto is an extraordinary analysis why the economy will absorb a frightful tax increase all at one time. The fallout to commerce could become the real end of the world scenario. Take the time and watch the insightful observations from a courageous number cruncher who served this nation with distinction during the Reagan Presidency.

Read the entire article on the Negotium archive page

Discuss or comment about this essay on the BATR Forum


#17506 From: Supreme Law Firm <paulandrewmitchell2004@...>
Date: Fri Feb 17, 2012 4:46 pm
Subject: We salute Minnesota's Gracefully Aging Babe for her forthrightness in confronting current reality
paulandrewmi...
Send Email Send Email
 

----- Forwarded Message -----
From: Edward C. Ebert Jr. <ecosoft@...>
To: Edward C. Ebert Jr. <ecosoft@...>
Sent: Friday, February 17, 2012 8:29 AM
Subject:

What a great snowy Friday morning read this was … laughed uproariously and I salute the Minnesota Gracefully Aging Babe for her forthrightness in confronting current reality. J
 
 
 
 
True story out of McGregor, MN from a State Trooper...

I made a traffic stop on an elderly lady the other day for speeding on MN State Highway 210 at Mile Marker 197 just East of McGregor, MN.

I asked for her driver’s license, registration and proof of insurance.

The lady took out the required information and handed it to me. In with the cards I was somewhat surprised (due to her advanced age) to see she had a Conceal Carry Permit. I looked at her and ask if she had a weapon in her possession at this time.

She responded that she indeed had a .45 automatic in her glove box.

Something - - - body language, or the way she said it - - - made me want to ask if she had any other firearms. She did admit to also having a 9mm Glock in her center console. Now I had to ask one more time if that was all. She responded once again that she did have just one more, a .38 special in her purse. I then asked her what she was so afraid of.

She looked me right in the eye and said, “Not a f---ing thing!”



#17507 From: Supreme Law Firm <paulandrewmitchell2004@...>
Date: Fri Feb 17, 2012 8:27 pm
Subject: Private Attorney General's OBJECTIONS Re: "This is one pissed off lady from Canada ...."
paulandrewmi...
Send Email Send Email
 

----- Forwarded Message -----
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell <supremelawfirm@...>
To: FRANCO E MEDINA <frakor@...>
Sent: Friday, February 17, 2012 12:25 PM
Subject: Private Attorney General's OBJECTIONS Re: "This is one pissed off lady from Canada ...."

"Are we fighting a war on terror or aren't we? Was it or was it not, started by Islamic people who brought it to our shores on September 11, 2001 and have continually threatened to do so since?

No, it was not "started by Islamic people who brought it to our shores on 9/11." 

Geeeesh!!


It was "started" by a conspiracy of Americans and Israeli partisans
associated with the Project for a New American Century ("PNAC").

9/11 was a JOINT VENTURE of the Central Intelligence Agency
and the Mossad (Israeli secret police), aided and abetted
by traitors who infiltrated the Pentagon:

http://www.supremelaw.org/authors/mitchell/inside.job.htm

The conspirators assembled at JFK,
boarded a FULL El Al Boeing 747,
and departed 4:11 PM destination
Ben Gurion International Airport in Tel Aviv!!


The A-3 Skywarrior that hit the Pentagon had a
FRIENDLY TRANSPONDER BEACON installed
to broadcast a FRIENDLY AIRCRAFT I.D. CODE,
which caused the Pentagon's automatic fire control
system to STAND DOWN.

Captain Gerald DeConto was on the telephone to Gordon England,
Secretary of the Navy, requesting authorization to override that
automatic fire control system, when he was incinerated by the
AGM (air-to-ground missile) that hit first, to soften an entrance hole
for the A-3 following right behind that missile.

You don't seriously believe that 19 Arab "hijackers" did the
modifications and remote-control for that jet, DO YOU???


Those modifications were performed in a private hangar
at Fort Collins-Loveland Municipal Airport, using one of
a fleet of A-3 Skywarriors purchased by Raytheon.

WAKE UP!!

--
Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964
http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/agency/private.attorney.general.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/reading.list.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/index.htm (Home Page)
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.policy.htm (Support Policy)
http://www.supremelaw.org/guidelines.htm (Client Guidelines)
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.guidelines.htm (Policy + Guidelines)

All Rights Reserved without Prejudice


2012/2/15 FRANCO E MEDINA <frakor@...>



FRAkor International, LLC
Franco Medina
1122 East Pike #730
Seattle, WA 98122
 

 


From: learybob@...
To: learybob@...
Subject: FW: This is one pissed off lady from Canada & I agree with her 100%
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 13:09:30 -0800

 
 
Subject: Fw: This is one pissed off  lady& I agree with her 100%
 
 
 
 
Forward if  as many as you can, we must get rid of Obama and his radical socialists.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
I don't care that some troops pissed on some Taliban bodies. The
idiot who put it on YouTube should be castrated.

Thought you might like to read this letter to the editor. Ever notice how some people just seem to know how to write a letter?

This one surely does!

This was written by a American woman, but oh how it also applies to the Canada , U.K. And Australia .


THIS ONE PACKS A FIRM PUNCH


Written by a housewife in New York , to her local newspaper. This is one ticked off lady...


"Are we fighting a war on terror or aren't we? Was it or was it not, started by Islamic people who brought it to our shores on September 11, 2001and have continually threatened to do so since?

Were people from all over the world, not brutally murdered that day, in downtown Manhattan , across the Potomac from the capitol of the USA and in a field in Pennsylvania ?

Did nearly three thousand men, women and children die a horrible, burning or crushing death that day, or didn't they?

And I'm supposed to care that a few Taliban were claiming to be tortured by a justice system of a nation they are fighting against in a brutal Insurgency.

I'll care about the Koran when the fanatics in the Middle East, start caring about the Holy Bible, the mere belief of which, is a crime punishable by beheading in Afghanistan.

I'll care when these thugs tell the world they are sorry for hacking off Nick Berg's head, while Berg screamed through his gurgling slashed throat.

I'll care when the cowardly so-called 'insurgents' in Afghanistan , come out and fight like men, instead of disrespecting their own religion by hiding in Mosques and behind women and children.

I'll care when the mindless zealots who blow themselves up in search of Nirvana, care about the innocent children within range of their suicide Bombs.

I'll care when the American media stops pretending that their freedom of Speech on stories, is more important than the lives of the soldiers on the ground or their families waiting at home, to hear about them when something happens.

In the meantime, when I hear a story about a American soldier roughing up an Insurgent terrorist to obtain information, know this:

I don't care.

When I see a wounded terrorist get shot in the head when he is told not to move because he might be booby-trapped, you can take it to the bank:

I don't care. Shoot him again.

When I hear that a prisoner, who was issued a Koran and a prayer mat, and fed 'special' food, that is paid for by my tax dollars, is complaining that his holy book is being 'mishandled,' you can absolutely believe, in your heart of hearts:

I don't care.

And oh, by the way, I've noticed that sometimes it's spelled 'Koran' and other times 'Quran.' Well, Jimmy Crack Corn you guessed it.

I don't care!!

If you agree with this viewpoint, pass this on to all your E-mail Friends. Sooner or later, it'll get to the people responsible for this ridiculous behavior!

If you don't agree, then by all means hit the delete button. Should you choose the latter, then please don't complain when more atrocities committed by radical Muslims happen here in our great Country! And may I add:

Some people spend an entire lifetime wondering, if during their life on earth, they made a difference in the world. But, the Soldiers don't have that problem.

I have another quote that I would like to share AND...I hope you forward All this.

One last thought for the day:

Only five defining forces have ever offered to die for you:

1. Jesus Christ

2. The British Soldier.

3. The Canadian Soldier.

4. The US Soldier, and

5. The Australian Soldier

One died for your soul, the other four, for you and your children's Freedom.


YOU MIGHT WANT TO PASS THIS ON, AS MANY SEEM TO FORGET!


AMEN! GOD BLESS AMERICA.
 


____________________________________________________________
 
 
 
G
 
 






--




#17508 From: William Topel <wmtopel@...>
Date: Sun Feb 19, 2012 6:59 am
Subject: Re: We salute Minnesota's Gracefully Aging Babe for her forthrightness i
wmtopel
Send Email Send Email
 
Great story!  I laughed for the first time today after reading it!
 
Bill Topel

http://www.freedomwriter.com
http://www.flickr.com/photos/freedomwriter/sets
http://www.myspace.com/alaskafreedomwriter
http://www.winnercreektrail2009.shutterfly.com
Registered RON PAUL Delegate.
Anchorage, AK.




Messages 17479 - 17508 of 18440   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright 2010 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines NEW - Help