NHNE News List
Current Members: 1347
Subscribe/unsubscribe/archive info at the bottom of this message.
NHNE Spring Summer 2005 Fundraiser:
Money needed = $4,944.00
Donations to date = $4,208.11
Number of people who have helped = 84
Funds still needed = $735.89
To make a tax-deductible donation:
NHNE Website:
http://tinyurl.com/8su4u
PayPal:
http://tinyurl.com/7jyub
eMail:
nhne@...
Phone: (928) 282-6120
Fax: (815) 642-0117
Mail: NHNE, P.O. Box 2242, Sedona, AZ 86339
Credit Cards: Please include number, expiration date, phone number.
Your donations are tax-deductible. Thank you!
------------
A LIVABLE SHADE OF GREEN
By Nicholas D. Kristof
New York Times
July 3, 2005
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/07/03/opinion/03kristof.html
PORTLAND, Ore. - When President Bush travels to the Group of 8 summit
meeting this week, he'll stiff Tony Blair and other leaders who are
appealing for firm action on global warming.
"Kyoto would have wrecked our economy," Mr. Bush told a Danish interviewer
recently, referring to the accord to curb carbon emissions. Maybe that was a
plausible argument a few years ago, but now the city of Portland is proving
it flat wrong.
Newly released data show that Portland, America's environmental laboratory,
has achieved stunning reductions in carbon emissions. It has reduced
emissions below the levels of 1990, the benchmark for the Kyoto accord,
while booming economically.
What's more, officials in Portland insist that the campaign to cut carbon
emissions has entailed no significant economic price, and on the contrary
has brought the city huge benefits: less tax money spent on energy, more
convenient transportation, a greener city, and expertise in energy
efficiency that is helping local businesses win contracts worldwide.
"People have looked at it the wrong way, as a drain," said Mayor Tom Potter,
who himself drives a Prius hybrid. "Actually it's something that attracts
people. ... It's economical; it makes sense in dollars."
I've been torn about what to do about global warming. But the evidence is
growing that climate change is a real threat: I was bowled over when I
visited the Arctic and talked to Eskimos who described sea ice disappearing,
permafrost melting and visits by robins, for which they have no word in the
local language.
In the past, economic models tended to discourage aggressive action on
greenhouse gases, because they indicated that the cost of curbing carbon
emissions could be extraordinarily high, amounting to perhaps 3 percent of
G.N.P.
That's where Portland's experience is so crucial. It confirms the
suggestions of some economists that we can take initial steps against global
warming without economic disruptions. Then in a decade or two, we can decide
whether to proceed with other, costlier steps.
In 1993, Portland became the first local government in the United States to
adopt a strategy to deal with climate change. The latest data, released a
few weeks ago, show the results: Greenhouse gas emissions last year in
Multnomah County, which includes Portland, dropped below the level of 1990,
and per capita emissions were down 13 percent.
This was achieved partly by a major increase in public transit, including
two light rail lines and a streetcar system. The city has also built 750
miles of bicycle paths, and the number of people commuting by foot or on
bicycle has increased 10 percent.
Portland offers all city employees either a $25-per-month bus pass or car
pool parking. Private businesses are told that if they provide employees
with subsidized parking, they should also subsidize bus commutes.
The city has also offered financial incentives and technical assistance to
anyone constructing a "green building" with built-in energy efficiency.
Then there are innumerable little steps, such as encouraging people to
weatherize their homes. Portland also replaced the bulbs in the city's
traffic lights with light-emitting diodes, which reduce electricity use by
80 percent and save the city almost $500,000 a year.
"Portland's efforts refute the thesis that you can't make progress without
huge economic harm," says Erik Sten, a city commissioner. "It actually goes
all the other way -- to the extent Portland has been successful, the things
that we were doing that happened to reduce emissions were the things that
made our city livable and hence desirable."
Mr. Sten added that Portland's officials were able to curb carbon emissions
only because the steps they took were intrinsically popular and cheap,
serving other purposes like reducing traffic congestion or saving on
electrical costs. "I haven't seen that much willingness even among our
environmentalists," he said, "to do huge masochistic things to save the
planet."
So as he heads to the summit meeting, Mr. Bush should get a briefing on
Portland's experience (a full report is at
<
http://www.sustainableportland.org> and accept that we don't need to
surrender to global warming.
Perhaps eventually we will face hard trade-offs. But for now Portland shows
that we can help our planet without "wrecking" our economy -- indeed, at no
significant cost at all. At the Group of 8, that should be a no-brainer.
------------
NHNE News List:
To subscribe, send a message to:
nhnenews-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
To unsubscribe, send a message to:
nhnenews-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
To review current posts:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/nhnenews/messages
Published by David Sunfellow
NewHeavenNewEarth (NHNE)
eMail:
nhne@...
NHNE Website:
http://www.nhne.com/
Phone: (928) 282-6120
Fax: (815) 642-0117
Appreciate what we are doing?
You can say so with a tax-deductible donation:
http://www.nhne.com/main/donations.html
P.O. Box 2242
Sedona, AZ 86339