NHNE News List
Current Members: 767
Subscribe/unsubscribe/archive info at the bottom of this message.

------------

PHONE STUDY: HOLEY RAT'S BRAINS 
By Elisa Batista
Wired
January 31, 2003

http://www.wired.com/news/wireless/0,1382,57488,00.html?tw=wn_ascii

In a study that may shed some light on whether cell-phone use is harmful to
callers, Swedish scientists found that radiation emitted by the world's most
common mobile phones burns holes in the brains of rats.

Swedish neurosurgeon Leif Salfold and his team tested the radiation emitted
from Global System for Mobile communications phones on 12- to 26-week-old
rats. The age group of the animals tested, researchers say, is equivalent to
that of human teenagers -- who tend to lead the pack in cell-phone use
worldwide. GSM phones are the most commonly used around the globe,
particularly in Europe, Asia and the Middle East.

"The situation of the growing brain might deserve special concern, since
biological and maturational processes are particularly vulnerable," wrote
the study's authors. "We cannot exclude that after some decades of often
daily use, a whole generation of users may suffer negative effects as early
as middle age."

The cell-phone industry has long disputed the results of studies like
Salfold's because such effects have not been documented in humans. Both the
World Health Organization and U.S. Food and Drug Administration have said
there is no evidence that cell-phone radiation is harmful to users, but that
there is also no absolute evidence to the contrary either. The New England
Journal of Medicine and Journal of the American Medical Association both
ruled out that infrequent and short-term cell-phone use -- up to five years
-- causes brain cancer.

Most recently, a federal judge threw out a case brought by a Maryland
neurologist who claimed his brain tumor was caused by frequent cell-phone
use. Federal Judge Catherine Blake ruled that none of the evidence submitted
by Dr. Christopher Newman was substantial enough to warrant a trial.

"We found that the preponderance of scientific evidence continues to show
that there is no adverse health effects in using wireless phones," said
Jo-Anne Basile, vice president of external relations for the Cellular
Telecommunications & Internet Association . "As you know, wireless phones
are regulated by strict government standards, and those standards are
constantly being reviewed by the federal agencies responsible for the
public's health. Part of what they do is that they are always looking at new
research to make sure that these rules continue to protect the public's
health. This study will be reviewed along with others."

Still, Salfold's findings have raised eyebrows in the scientific community
and cell-phone industry, and among the public.

The study was published in the peer-reviewed journal Environmental Health
Perspectives , a publication of the National Institute of Environmental
Health Sciences, which is part of the Department of Health and Human
Services. Salfold's study is also one of the first to suggest that
cell-phone use causes a malady other than brain cancer.

"This is a big story," said Louis Slesin, editor of Microwave News . "I
don't think it's good to peg this story as if we are all going to get brain
damage. But you can't ignore it."

The Swedish study included three groups of rats that were exposed for two
hours to various GSM phones at different levels of radiation. The study
found a link between electromagnetic frequency exposure and a leakage in
albumin -- a protein in human tissue -- through the blood-brain barrier. The
researchers also noticed that the neuron damage the rats suffered increased
in response to the amount of EMF exposure.

The authors of the study acknowledged that their test sample was small, but
that "the combined results are highly significant and exhibit a clear
dose-response relation."

Such a hole in the brain could prove life-threatening because it would mean
that almost anything circulating in the blood -- including toxic pollutants
-- could enter the brain, said Dr. Tom Goehl, editor-in-chief of
Environmental Health Perspectives .

"Again this is in adolescent rodents," Goehl said. "It's pretty much hard to
jump to humans. But it may be a warning signal that this is something to
look at."

Goehl said that, on average, his publication accepts only 20 to 25 percent
of 800 studies reviewed each year.

His publication snapped up this study because, unlike most other research of
its kind, it didn't focus on whether the devices would cause cancer.

"Now we have another way to look at (this issue)," he said. "Maybe this has
a far-reaching effect and ... this is just a warning sign that we need to
take a closer look at (this issue)."

------------

NHNE News List:

To subscribe, send a message to:
nhnenews-subscribe@yahoogroups.com

To unsubscribe, send a message to:
nhnenews-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

To review current posts:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/nhnenews/messages

Published by NewHeavenNewEarth (NHNE)
eMail: nhne@...
NHNE Website: http://www.nhne.com/
Phone: (928) 282-6120
Fax: (815) 346-1492

Appreciate what we are doing?
You can say so with a tax-deductible donation:
http://www.nhne.com/main/donations.html

P.O. Box 2242
Sedona, AZ 86339