I think Paul was all about love for other people, which is why in both of the main *conscience* passages he addresses the concern of others. While I think it is important we strive to show others a way of thinking that liberates us from the bondage of legalism, I believe we have to do it tactfully. But I am fairly vocal with new friends, whether Christian or non-Christian. One of the first questions I ask is, "Do you drink?" or "What do you drink?" I don't necessarily ask that to have a drink with them (though that would be nice too). I ask it to find out where they are, because the vast majority of the time, Christians who don't drink are usually (Remember, I said *usually*) legalists. Then there are of course those who had bad experiences. Either way, we are called to be sensitive around them. Paul wants us to be considerate of Christians who struggle with legalism. He calls them weaker brothers. Therefore, if a person is struggling with being "weak" in this area
(btw, notice that Paul considers legalism weakness, not struggling with vice etc.), we should strive to show them what true strength is. True strength is standing fast in the liberty wherewith Christ has made us free and not being entagled again with the yoke of bondage.
In Christ,
Ward
Charles Shank <shankhaus2003@...> wrote:
Well, Ward; I would have to agree with your premise that it's all ( or mostly ) in our attitude ( or conscience ), in other words, not
necessarily WHAT we do, but WHY we do it; it IS a matter of personal conscience! Paul said, in I Cor: 10:23, that 'all things are lawful for me, but not all things are helpful; all things are lawful for me, but not all things edify', and then of course the following verse, 'let no one seek his own, but each one the others well-being.' Paul speaks to this also in I Cor 8:6-13 and also in Romans 14:22,23.
However, as to whether Roman Catholics worship their icons or not: it might depend on what your definition of 'worship' is and also what you mean by 'icon'!
I do understand, though; about partaking of the Eucharist, even while a full-preterist; because I, believing what I do, attend a Fundamental Baptist church and partake of the Lord's Supper there about once a month.
Ward Fenley <wardfenley@yahoo.com> wrote:
To be as fair as possible both to Ed and the Catholic church, I was once a cantor for a Catholic church. The priest knew I was not Catholic but hired me anyway. I was honestly just seeking a part time job. But after directing music for the church for one year I concluded that at least these Catholics and the priest do *not* worship icons. In fact, over the course of that year I began to be very fond of the various icons meant not to draw worship but rather to draw our attention to event (e.g. the stations of the cross etc.). Granted, I prefer an empty cross, but at the same time, I was told so many times about how awful a crucifix with the dead Christ on it was an abomination, and yet I was often stricken with a profound awareness of Christ during the mass. I took part in the Mass all while being a full preterist who does not even affirm a post AD 70 Eucharist mandate. However, in my
conscience, I simply partook freely of the Eucharist and thought about the beauty and glory of the cross and resurrection. We must be careful to use our conscience to glorify God through whatever we do. There was nothing wrong with me taking the Eucharist, and there would have been nothing wrong with abstaining. In fact, there were times I did abstain simply because I didn't feel like taking it on any given Saturday night or Sunday morning.
Our consciences are free to glorify Christ by whatever means He has granted.
In Christ,
Ward
Charles Shank <shankhaus2003@yahoo.com> wrote:
4You shall not make for yourself an image, whether in the form of anything that is in heaven above, or
that is on the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth. 5You shall not bow down to them or worship them; for I the Lord your God am a jealous God, I'm not accusing you, Ed; of this, but, from my understanding; there are many in the Roman Catholic ( or Catholic ) Church, that do exactly that.
I think that we must take the command not to make images ( icons ) in the context of the command not to worship ( or revere ) them; Isaiah says not to fear them, because they cannot do any good, but neither can they do any harm!
I think that God's command not to make images ( icons ) for the purposes of worship was more for the purpose of teaching us trust in, or worship; not the things that we could experientially 'see' (physical ), but in what we could not experientially 'see' ( the spiritual, or God alone )
I wrote this paper awhile back ( last year ), and while not necessarily written to answer this question; I think it may pertain to it! Let me know what you think. ED BURLEY <burleywu@yahoo.com> wrote:You know, there are a lot of things about the OT that I don't think we understand. E.g., YWHW's prohibition of graven images. I personally believe, as the Orthodox and Catholics do that His prohibition was because someday HE would send His OWN ICON. His express ICON. JESUS Himself - God Incarnate. To make images prior to Christ's coming was to make your own image of who god was. But God Himself sent His Image/Icon to show the world what He was like.
in Christ's Great Love,Charles Shank
" You are only quite a little fellow in a wide world, after
all." Gandalf the Grey to Bilbo Baggins ( J.R.R. Tolkien )
Well, Ward; I would have to agree with your premise that it's all ( or mostly ) in our attitude ( or conscience ), in other words, not necessarily WHAT we do,...
I think Paul was all about love for other people, which is why in both of the main *conscience* passages he addresses the concern of others. While I think it...
I agree, brother! Ward Fenley <wardfenley@...> wrote: I think Paul was all about love for other people, which is why in both of the main *conscience*...
This (below, from Ward) is an excellent post! I just saw a link to it on another forum, and was reading it over and contemplating it in light of Scripture, and...
Tami, Amen! If you look at the context of the NT writings, the "unbelievers" were those Jews who did not believe in Jesus as their Messiah. They denied that he...
... I did! the "unbelievers" were those Jews who did not believe in Jesus as their Messiah. Exactly! I think you would like that article. :) Tami They denied...
Right, Ed; so many 'Christians' today are taught ( and teach ) that we need to dis-fellowship with 'unbelievers' because they don't apply ( consistently,...
It is very sad and disheartening to realize that many un-believers out there are more Christian, though maybe for he wrong reasons sometimes, than many...
Ward Fenley <wardfenley@...> wrote: Does the existence of your physical body grant me the only permission to ask you to pray for me? If so, why? If not,...
... READ CAPS BELOW ... THAT IT IS ONLY A HOPE THAT WE ARE THERE WITH THEM? OR, DO YOU MEAN TO SAY THAT WE ACTUALLY ARE THERE WITH THEM PARTICIPATING WITH...
... I don't know when Brian will be back so Iwill jump in here to offer some clarification (not that Brian wasn't perfectly clear) by just highlighting what he...
Yes, exactly Tami.. Thanks. Stephen, just to summarize.. I believe we are in Heaven now communing spiritually with all the saints of all generations. This ...
Brian, Thank you. And thank you again! Forgiveness=heaven. If everyone would realize this, all would be settled. Yes, I realize there is a heck of a lot of...
... would realize this, all would be settled. Yes, I realize there is a heck of a lot of theology involved to prove this, but it is plain. Forgiveness=heaven. ...
Tami, awesome stuff. Just to clarify, yes it does sound so simple, but it is far from simple. It took me years as a preterist to shed the preconceptions I had...
... I believe we are actually there with them, sitting down in the Kingdom of Heaven, participating with them in all things "heavenly" :) As Tami pointed...
Hello, Stephen; yes: welcome to the group! I would ask one question first, for clarification purposes: What do you mean by the 'visible' KOH? Do you mean the...
... To All, thanks for your comments. I think I know where you are leaving this subject. It appears that my questions can not be answered at this time. All...
Hi Stephen I believe we communicate in the same way with believers who have passed on in the same way we communicate with Jesus. Audibly? No. Visibly? No....
Ward, Thank you for your insight. You answered my question about communicating with the invisible saints "perfectly." I agree with your conclusion. I came to...
Hi Stephen, This is the second time you have made reference to: "..the fact that if Jesus was crucified "before" time that we "had" to had been "in Him" before...
Tami, I think that Stephen is referring to Revelation 13:8; All inhabitants of the earth will worship the beast--all whose names have not been written in the...
Ed, Stephen; see how this 'hits' you: In the greater spiritual reality, Jesus was crucified ( slain ) 'before the foundation of the world', but not in physical...
I also had a thought for all y'all; if the 'world' in Revelation 13:8, Hebrews 4:3, and Ephesians 1:4, et al. is the same 'world as in Matthew 4:8, 26:13, John...
Ward has a good article on Rev 13:8 but I seem to be unable to locate it. Ward, help! The phrase "foundation of the world" I think refers to the creation of...
Brian, I agree 100% with everything you said, except the part about eternity. Although time existed before the creation of the old covenant (KOSMOS), God was...
I can see what you are saying, and I can see how that view of eternity could be the logic out-working of our (preterists) belief system. However, I tend to...
Brian, perhaps it may help you see things more clearly if you consider that the apostle Paul was given much more knowledge about eternity than he wrote about...