Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
naturalismphilosophyforum · Naturalism Philosophy Forum
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Want to share photos of your group with the world? Add a group photo to Flickr.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Messages 4792 - 4822 of 5350   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Messages: Simplify | Expand   (Group by Topic) Author Sort by Date ^
4792
Ken, No one disagrees about married bachelors, or that robbing banks and not robbing banks are both logical possibilities; that's a discussion for the first...
stephnlawrnce@...
stephnlawrnce
Offline Send Email
Mar 1, 2009
11:22 am
4793
Ken, If I went to a party yesterday, I was able to go to it, and I had to go to it. Don't see the problem with can=must. Unless you're thinking can refers to a...
stephnlawrnce@...
stephnlawrnce
Offline Send Email
Mar 1, 2009
11:46 am
4794
... This statement distills our disagreement down to a single short statement. "Could" does NOT always go with an if, and, or but. The verb in CHDO is the...
Ken Batts
ken_batts
Offline Send Email
Mar 1, 2009
2:55 pm
4795
We don't need to be concerned with the long, convoluted, historical discussion philosophers have about the term CHDO. If we remain in that realm, we'll end up...
Ken Batts
ken_batts
Offline Send Email
Mar 1, 2009
4:34 pm
4796
... wrote <And it is not trivial by saying can = must I think it has the tendency to cut the person who thinks this off from all the things it's possible for...
twclark2002
Offline Send Email
Mar 1, 2009
9:28 pm
4797
Hi Stephen, Ken, Steve, Tom, Surely it's more about whether someone suggested that you should say 'god dong' or what ever it was, ie, something caused you to...
Alice
xephani76
Offline Send Email
Mar 2, 2009
12:05 am
4798
Tom: The answer is, in a word, education, and all the complexity, repetition, reiteration, personal research, stating conclusions, etc. that involves. There's...
Ken Batts
ken_batts
Offline Send Email
Mar 2, 2009
12:18 am
4799
Alice: Your post, as usual, is a breath of fresh air. Thanks. Ken...
Ken Batts
ken_batts
Offline Send Email
Mar 2, 2009
12:21 am
4800
Hi Ken, That was a very clear overview. It was easy to read and restates the basics of what we're on about. Thanks. I'm really happy with my understanding of...
Alice
xephani76
Offline Send Email
Mar 2, 2009
12:34 am
4801
... Alice _____ From: naturalismphilosophyforum@yahoogroups.com [mailto:naturalismphilosophyforum@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Ken Batts Sent: Monday, 2 March...
Alice
xephani76
Offline Send Email
Mar 2, 2009
12:36 am
4802
... dawg!" ... free ... My answers: 1. No I will not be free to choose 2. No I was not free to choose (unless you catch me off guard) At the risk of...
deej0
Offline Send Email
Mar 2, 2009
4:51 am
4803
Hi Deejo, At the risk of compounding confusion, I would say that the illusion of 'free will' ia a genetic adaptation and may be useful to support high personal...
stephnlawrnce@...
stephnlawrnce
Offline Send Email
Mar 2, 2009
7:23 am
4804
Hi Alice, I’m really happy with my understanding of the world based on what I understand Naturalism to be telling me.  In the past I’ve found that I was...
stephnlawrnce@...
stephnlawrnce
Offline Send Email
Mar 2, 2009
7:44 am
4805
Ken ... This statement distills our disagreement down to a single short statement. "Could" does NOT always go with an if, and, or but. The verb in CHDO is the...
stephnlawrnce@...
stephnlawrnce
Offline Send Email
Mar 2, 2009
10:56 am
4806
Ken, So I propose we concentrate on the meaning of CHDO that is taught to all little children, the one most all of them grow up to believe: That, when they...
stephnlawrnce@...
stephnlawrnce
Offline Send Email
Mar 2, 2009
12:03 pm
4807
Tom, Those involved in this discussion (primarily Steve, Stephen, Ken, Tom) agree that we don't have libertarian free will – to have done otherwise given the...
stephnlawrnce@...
stephnlawrnce
Offline Send Email
Mar 2, 2009
12:39 pm
4808
Tom, "Since the person?*consists* of?the system of microstates, it doesn't make sense to say that the system of microstates could not?have done otherwise but...
stephnlawrnce@...
stephnlawrnce
Offline Send Email
Mar 2, 2009
3:00 pm
4809
When this discussion started I thought perhaps there was some common ground but alas, we disagree at the most fundamental level. Kids certainly are taught they...
Ken Batts
ken_batts
Offline Send Email
Mar 2, 2009
4:57 pm
4810
... circumstances. They jump to that conclusion as their parents did before them. And I suppose they could have refrained from jumping......
Ken Batts
ken_batts
Offline Send Email
Mar 2, 2009
5:15 pm
4811
... wrote: <The problem is if you define a person as above [as a system of microstates], then a person could not do otherwise if there was something different...
twclark2002
Offline Send Email
Mar 2, 2009
5:24 pm
4812
Tom, To see what, at least looks like a problem, we need to go back to Tim's original post that you then replied to.? Tim: It's true that someone could not...
stephnlawrnce@...
stephnlawrnce
Offline Send Email
Mar 2, 2009
6:03 pm
4813
Ken, I think there is plenty of common ground, see message 4807 <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naturalismphilosophyforum/message/4807> in which Stephen agrees...
twclark2002
Offline Send Email
Mar 2, 2009
6:13 pm
4814
... wrote: <If you are [saying that a person is the actual system of microstates] and it's true then the following must be false: "... since the person would...
twclark2002
Offline Send Email
Mar 2, 2009
6:35 pm
4815
Ken About a particular incident of a child putting a peg in a hole, it's nonsense to tell a child ... Yes that would be nonsense but to say they were able...
stephnlawrnce@...
stephnlawrnce
Offline Send Email
Mar 2, 2009
6:50 pm
4817
... can not am able b.t.w. If that were what people meant, they'd be saying something entirely trivial and thus entirely uninteresting. When someone says 'You...
Ken Batts
ken_batts
Offline Send Email
Mar 2, 2009
7:34 pm
4818
Tom: Well, maybe. Here's a sentence from Stephen's post: "But I think we need more too, we need to think we are preventing things which really could happen, it...
Ken Batts
ken_batts
Offline Send Email
Mar 2, 2009
9:23 pm
4819
Ken, I wish he'd said "Really could happen if we weren't effective in preventing it," which, if we were effective,in actuality, the thing really couldn't have...
stephnlawrnce@...
stephnlawrnce
Offline Send Email
Mar 2, 2009
10:24 pm
4820
Ken Medical analogy: If I'm a diabetic, and take my insulin tonight, I (probably) won't die tonight from hyperglycemia; if I don't take it, I'll probably die....
stephnlawrnce@...
stephnlawrnce
Offline Send Email
Mar 2, 2009
10:32 pm
4821
Ken, No hint of any actual ability to have done things otherwise, or any ability to prevent something from happening which really could happen. You can't...
stephnlawrnce@...
stephnlawrnce
Offline Send Email
Mar 2, 2009
10:33 pm
4822
Here is an interesting example of not?chdo but?could have happened otherwise. ...
stephnlawrnce@...
stephnlawrnce
Offline Send Email
Mar 2, 2009
11:15 pm
Messages 4792 - 4822 of 5350   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Advanced
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help