Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
naturalismphilosophyforum · Naturalism Philosophy Forum
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Message search is now enhanced, find messages faster. Take it for a spin.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Messages 23 - 54 of 5352   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Messages: Simplify | Expand   (Group by Topic) Author Sort by Date ^
23
Tom's "The Commitments of Naturalism - A Dialog" is interesting, but I noted something in Gabriel Mihalache's opening questions that was not addressed by...
Clarence Williams
clarencearth...
Offline Send Email
Sep 16, 2005
1:54 pm
24
Yes, the dialog didn't get to everything Gabriel asked about, including the question of how we justify ought statements (that is, values) if we don't have...
TWClark
twclark2002
Offline Send Email
Sep 16, 2005
3:07 pm
25
Tom, You know I am moved to ask what I am about to ask. When you wrote, "Another good reason to be thankful we aren't little gods", just what did you mean? ...
Phil Knight
philosopherk...
Offline Send Email
Sep 16, 2005
3:52 pm
26
I meant that we don't have contra-causal free will. To think we might have such free will would set us up as causally privileged over the rest of nature, just...
TWClark
twclark2002
Offline Send Email
Sep 16, 2005
5:28 pm
27
Tom, Yeah, that's what I thought was meant. But for the very same reasons that man's "free" will is an impossibility, it is impossible for any "god" to have...
Phil Knight
philosopherk...
Offline Send Email
Sep 16, 2005
6:36 pm
29
Gods, Choice Steve: You make a good point that we somehow assume that the very idea of a god with free will is a coherent concept. I think free will is like a...
Ken Batts
ken_batts
Offline Send Email
Sep 17, 2005
5:15 pm
30
Ken, Choice behavior is, indeed, a fully-determined cognitive process. I wouldn't call it a "subroutine" because that implies it is somehow linked or even...
Sonny Williams
clarencearth...
Offline Send Email
Sep 18, 2005
2:28 pm
31
Sonny, I don't understand what you are trying to say when you say, "all determinants, which are innumerable, must be identical, an impractical, nay, impossible...
Phil Knight
philosopherk...
Offline Send Email
Sep 18, 2005
9:38 pm
32
Sonny: The precise nature of choice behavior may be of some interest, I'm not denying that. I don't think it affects our basic ideas, after all no one here...
Ken Batts
ken_batts
Offline Send Email
Sep 19, 2005
3:07 am
33
To: <appliednaturalism@yahoogroups.com> From: "Bob Miller" <drmiller@...> Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2005 21:27:27 -0400 Subject: [appliednaturalism]...
Phil Knight
philosopherk...
Offline Send Email
Sep 19, 2005
12:47 pm
34
Steve: I agree that CNHDO is vital to an understanding of what we're talking about. One "little" place where the "could not have done otherwise" condition is...
Ken Batts
ken_batts
Offline Send Email
Sep 23, 2005
2:35 am
35
Yes, nice point Ken. The whole notion of explanation at the macro level is tied to the idea of lawful causation in which the same conditions would produce the...
TWClark
twclark2002
Offline Send Email
Sep 23, 2005
2:50 am
36
We all have an ethical obligation, I would argue, to be empiricists when our beliefs have implications and consequences for this world, which of course is most...
twclark2002
Offline Send Email
Sep 30, 2005
8:37 pm
37
Very plausible. My ideal is to seek and express the truth as I see it, even when it's difficult. We are like the child in the story of the emperor's new...
Ken Batts
ken_batts
Offline Send Email
Oct 1, 2005
3:52 pm
38
... solely on evidence." Yes, this sums it up, and the reason it's the best way is that evidence-based beliefs are the most reliable in tracking the world, and...
twclark2002
Offline Send Email
Oct 1, 2005
4:30 pm
39
... Trying to be as reliable as we can seems to me ethical behavior, even by traditional standards. Let's see, reliability, causality, compassion, control....
Ken Batts
ken_batts
Offline Send Email
Oct 3, 2005
5:11 pm
40
Science magazine, Volume 309, September 23, 2005, page 2010-2013, contained a Review I heartily recommend to all, titled, "Noise in Gene Expression: Origins,...
Sonny Williams
clarencearth...
Offline Send Email
Oct 3, 2005
9:23 pm
41
Nothing about the existence of "noise" is a challenge to hard determinism. "Noise" is as determined as "signal". The search for randomness is irrelevant to...
Ken Batts
ken_batts
Offline Send Email
Oct 4, 2005
1:15 am
42
Agreed - what this research challenges is what is known as "biological determinism" and not hard determinism. For the latter, the noise is just one of the...
jim lutsko
lutsko1
Offline Send Email
Oct 4, 2005
6:39 am
43
Ken, The critical and positive ingredient in denouncing free will is to understand causation. Neither determinism nor naturalism should be restricted to such...
Sonny Williams
clarencearth...
Offline Send Email
Oct 4, 2005
1:54 pm
44
I thought ya'll (my Alabama roots are showing) might enjoy this link to an article with the subject title. Best of all it's free! ...
Sonny Williams
clarencearth...
Offline Send Email
Oct 7, 2005
9:58 pm
46
Here's some data on what college kids actually think about free will, etc. in the context of challenging Israali philosopher Saul Smilansky's empirical...
twclark2002
Offline Send Email
Oct 20, 2005
2:51 am
47
I think you will all like The Case for Nietzschean Moral Psychology by Joshua Knobe and Brian Leiter . Rod...
RC Abbott
mrrcabbott
Offline Send Email
Oct 20, 2005
3:57 pm
48
Hi there. My name is Tom McWilliams, and I've come to your group for a rather specific purpose. I read earlier on this forum a taxonomy of belief, and I am an...
Tom
tommymaq
Offline Send Email
Oct 20, 2005
8:41 pm
49
Tom, You've got it all wrong. What you have here are three straw dogs. Sorry. Seems as if you are trying to assert the man's will is free. I get the impression...
Phil Knight
philosopherk...
Offline Send Email
Oct 21, 2005
1:32 am
50
Actually, most of us here don't defend determinism as necessarily the case, although it's a plausible working assumption at the macro level when trying to...
TWClark
twclark2002
Offline Send Email
Oct 21, 2005
1:48 am
51
... IMO the difficulty is not philosophical, it's psychological. People are taught from day one to blame and be blamed for their actions. Blame and retribution...
Ken Batts
ken_batts
Offline Send Email
Oct 21, 2005
3:30 am
52
... Sorry. Then you should have no trouble explaining *how* I've 'gotten it wrong.' ... It does seem as if the two possibilities are mutually exclusive, which...
Tom
tommymaq
Offline Send Email
Oct 21, 2005
3:42 am
53
... the case, although it's a plausible working assumption at the macro level when trying to understand the world (see ...
Tom
tommymaq
Offline Send Email
Oct 21, 2005
4:07 am
54
When I posted the link for Joshua Knobe's and Brian Leiter's paper: "The Case for Nietzsche's Moral Philosphy"; I used the BETA version which doesn't display...
RC Abbott
mrrcabbott
Offline Send Email
Oct 21, 2005
4:36 am
Messages 23 - 54 of 5352   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Advanced
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help