Group Information- Members: 109
- Category: Philosophy
- Founded: May 16, 2005
- Language: English
|
Visit the
Groups blog for the latest Yahoo! Groups information
Description
The purpose of the Naturalism Philosophy Forum (NPF) is to facilitate the investigation of scientific naturalism, its assumptions, structure, and logical implications. Members are encouraged to state and defend their views, adjust them in the light of counter-arguments, and if possible develop consensus statements about naturalism and its implications. Such work will help to clarify the philosophical and scientific status of naturalism so that it might be presented to the wider culture as a coherent alternative to faith-based worldviews such as traditional religions and new age philosophies.
Members are strongly encouraged to be respectful in their discourse, to avoid philosophical jargon unless it is explicitly spelled out, and to provide examples to illustrate their points. Some online resources related to naturalism can be found at http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/
nontheism/naturalism/index.html and www.naturalism.org. Members are encouraged to suggest other resources.
This group is sponsored by the Center for Naturalism (CFN), which seeks to promote naturalism and its positive personal and social implications. Other Yahoo groups sponsored by the CFN are the Applied Naturalism Group - a general forum to explore the personal and social applications of naturalism; the CFN Therapy Group - to integrate naturalism into psychotherapy; and CFN Fellowship - to develop face-to-face naturalist communities and fellowships. See also Determinism - Les Garwood's original Yahoo group on determinism and naturalism.
Questions and comments about this group can be directed to Tom Clark, director of the Center for Naturalism, at twc@naturalism.org.
|
Re: Hey friend,l
Hi dear, How are you doing recently? I'd like to introduce you a very good foreign trading online company. It can offer you so many kinds of electronic
Posted - Tue Nov 24, 2009 2:52 am
|
JRS .
jrs_300
Offline Send Email
|
Re: Compassion
Hi Stephen, What do you have against the words 'would' 'will' and 'may'? these seem to cover all the cases you wish to describe without bringing up the specter
Posted - Mon Nov 23, 2009 10:15 pm
|
JRS .
jrs_300
Offline Send Email
|
Re: Compassion
Ken, All events are results of their determinants, they are the only thing that could have happened, they couldn't have happened otherwise. So it's physically
Posted - Mon Nov 23, 2009 9:07 pm
|
stephnlawrnce@...
stephnlawrnce
Offline Send Email
|
Re: Compassion
I'm with you Ken.. It sounds to me like a car enthusiast (driver) talking to a mechanic.. "gee I love the way that car roles into the corners." "Well it
Posted - Mon Nov 23, 2009 6:17 pm
|
Alice
xephani76
Offline Send Email
|
Re: Compassion
All events are results of their determinants, they are the only thing that could have happened, they couldn't have happened otherwise.
Posted - Mon Nov 23, 2009 2:19 pm
|
Ken
ken_batts
Offline Send Email
|
Add naturalismphilosophyforum to your personalized My Yahoo! page What's This?
|
Message History
Group Email Addresses
| Post message: |
naturalismphilosophyforum@yahoogroups.com |
| Subscribe: |
naturalismphilosophyforum-subscribe@yahoogroups.com |
| Unsubscribe: |
naturalismphilosophyforum-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com |
| List owner: |
naturalismphilosophyforum-owner@yahoogroups.com |
|