Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
mukto-mona
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Show off your group to the world. Share a photo of your group with us.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Re: Kashmir   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #4661 of 52932 |
WHY KASHMIR SHOULD REMAIN WITH INDIA
 
 
In 1947, Pakistan was created as a state for the Muslims. Although major leaders like Gandhi and Nehru and minor leaders like Jogen Mondal probably thought that the new country would stop at the emancipation of the Muslim underclass. Giving education, power and human dignity to an underclass is always worth supporting. However, over the last fifty-four years Pakistan and socalled Bangladesh (better term as formal East Pakistan ) have clearly proven to be more for discrimination, hatred and naked acts of barbarism against the non-Muslims than for the emancipation of the Muslims of so-called Bangladesh.
 

From a humanitarian point, the civilized world should not allow the Indian part of Kashmir to be given to Pakistan. Both (so-called ) Bangladesh and Pakistan have proven that if Kashmir were to be part of Pakistan, the non-Muslims of that land would meet systematic and government sponsored brutality and expulsion from their homes. Even if the majority of Kashmiris want to be part of Pakistan, or independent, the civilized world should care about the future of the non-Muslims of that land. In other words, uncivilized treatment of minorities should not be permitted in the name of giving irresponsible people the right to self-determination.

 

Here is another point about Kashmir where the Indian leaders and the media have not done a very good job. In 1947, when Pakistan invaded the kingdom of Kashmir, the king sought help from India and signed his country's accession to India. Technically, all of Kashmir is part of India. Technically, Pakistan remains a criminal occupier of a part of Kashmir. The UN resolution of 1948 called for Pakistan to vacate Kashmir, and for India to give a plebiscite there. Pakistan never vacated Kashmir, yet they have pretty much convinced the world that India was in violation of that UN resolution. What a shame, the criminal gets the upper hand in the diplomatic front!

 

I find it absurd that India talks about bilateral talk on Kashmir with Pakistan. When a looter occupies part of your home, would it be honorable of you to negotiate with him? No. You need to go to the court, to neighbors who might be good, to the world that can see the crime of invasion. On Kashmir, India should talk bilateral with the UN, multilateral with the US, the UK, and others. India should not show much interest in talking with Pakistan, even in the presence of the world. This pan-Islamic talk of "Kashmir is in our blood" (Mosharraf's speech) is nothing but hatred against the Hindus. We the non-Muslim of the Indian subcontinent, including the leaders of India, should make this point clear to the world.

 

with best wishes

Sukhamaya Bain, Ph.D.
44 Hickory Lane
Waterford, CT 06385



Sun Feb 24, 2002 9:38 pm

subain2002@...
Send Email Send Email

Forward
Message #4661 of 52932 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

WHY KASHMIR SHOULD REMAIN WITH INDIA     In 1947, Pakistan was created as a state for the Muslims. Although major leaders like Gandhi and Nehru and minor...
Sukhamaya Bain
subain2002@...
Send Email
Feb 25, 2002
11:01 am

In response to http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mukto-mona/message/4661 You should also consider the following points. 1. After taking over Kashmir, Govt.of India...
Nalinaksha Bhattachar...
nalinaksha
Offline Send Email
Feb 27, 2002
11:35 am
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help