IRT: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mukto-mona/message/36148

Dear Mr Raihan,

Thanks for your second response.  You wrote: "I did not have even a single point against Avijit's write-up on evolution theory."

Consider the title of your response to his write-up: "Opposite Side of the Coin..." in TWO parts. It seems another member might have also thought your "coin" was the Theory of Evolution itself. (#36159).  If indeed you made "some general comments" only, how much generality away from Darwinism but about something else did you find in his write-up that pumped so much intellectual sperm that you birthed a set of twins: two multi-page responses, for which you deemed "Opposite Side of the Coin..." was most suitable?

Please let us know what you thought Avijit's "coin" was, Mr Raihan, whose one side shone so brightly and offensively that you felt you must flip it, by offering your multi-volume dimmed flippancy (a term I'm using as a noun to label your essay; let there be no misunderstanding that it was aimed at your style, or at your person.)?

You may respond in full Bangla and post a pdf file.  At any rate, please respond to the following questions, at least:

(1)  What was Avijit's "coin" (main theme)?

(2)  Did your title "Opposite Side of the Coin" indicate you disagreed with that theme, or otherwise?

Previously I made incidental comments about some Muslims and their hapless penchant to deny science, just so their delusions about the Koran being the answer-all they could stick with.  If indeed it disturbed you to smell any inferential similarities due to which you clarified you might not be that which I am always assuming about you, please help me:  Let me know if you endorse whatever Islamic version of creation there's afloat, or if you consider Darwin's theory of evolution as the more likely explanation. (3)

Thanks.

~Syed M. Islam