http://digg.com/politics/Exporting_Inflation

Rand Paul speaks to the Republican Liberty Caucus.

Please digg and comment.
Please Watch the you-tubes and comment on them too.


PS, I have a new blog
http://randforsenate.blogspot.com

C4SS Advisory Panel Announced

Posted: 19 Aug 2009 01:45 PM PDT

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Market anarchist media center names advisory panel.

AUBURN, ALABAMA — August 19, 2009 — Center for a Stateless Society
(C4SS) — Center for a Stateless Society Director Brad Spangler today
announced formation of an advisory panel for the market anarchist media
center.

“As we gradually build our base of supporters and step up the operations
their dedicated support enables, we want to ensure that first rate
ideological and operational oversight is in place from prominent fellow
advocates of market anarchism who are not otherwise affiliated with us
organizationally,” remarked Spangler.

Named to the C4SS Advisory Panel were Stephan Kinsella, Wendy McElroy,
Shawn Wilbur, Sheldon Richman and Gary Chartier.

###

ORGANIZATIONAL SUMMARY
The Center for a Stateless Society is the Molinari Institute’s media
center. The mission of the Molinari Institute is to promote
understanding of the philosophy of Market Anarchism as a sane,
consensual alternative to the hypertrophic violence of the State. The
Institute takes its name from Gustave de Molinari (1819-1912),
originator of the theory of Market Anarchism.

CONTACT
Brad Spangler
Center for a Stateless Society
media@...
http://www.c4ss.org/

http://digg.com/politics/A_New_Champion_Dr_Rand_Paul

Let's get this Video Dugg, and Ranked on You Tube.

Remember to donate to Rand Paul August 20th.
Pledge at http://www.runrandrun.com
Donate at http://www.randpaul2010.com

Tracy

I wrote March but meant April.

>>> "Roderick Long" <longrob@...> 08/08/09 4:18 PM >>>
Molinarians:

And here's tentative information about a Molinari/C4SS-related gig in
Vegas next march:
http://aaeblog.net/2009/08/08/proletarian-revolution-in-las-vegas

Roderick

Molinarians:

And here's tentative information about a Molinari/C4SS-related gig in
Vegas next march:
http://aaeblog.net/2009/08/08/proletarian-revolution-in-las-vegas

Roderick

Molinarians:

The schedule for the 2009 Molinari Society symposium on intellectual
property is now online:
http://praxeology.net/molinarisoc.htm#programs

Flourish in liberty,

Roderick

He's a tireless worker?  Yet we've been giving him time off to sleep at
night? That ends now!


>>> Dick Clark <crotalus@...> 04/27/09 4:19 PM >>>
Great news! Gil is a tireless worker for the cause of liberty.

On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 4:37 PM, Roderick Long
<longrob@...>wrote:

>
>
> 27 April 2009
>
> Gil Guillory named Research Associate
>
> FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
>
> Libertarian writer and entrepreneur Gil Guillory has been named
Research
> Associate.
>
> AUBURN, ALABAMA – April 27, 2009 – Libertarian writer and entrepreneur
> Gil Guillory has been named Research Associate of the Molinari
> Institute. In his role, Guillory will continue his research programme
on
> a business model for private security, Subscription Patrol and
> Restitution.
>
> Guillory has authored, co-authored, and presented papers on
Subscription
> Patrol and Restitution since 2006. All of the work is licensed under
> Creative Commons Attribution, and is available on a web archive.
> Guillory has written for strike-the-root.com, anti-state.com,
> lewrockwell.com, and mises.org. His most recent publication was “The
> Role of Subscription Patrol and Restitution in the Future of Liberty,”
> co-authored with Patrick Tinsley, and published in Libertarian Papers.
>
> Molinari Institute President Roderick Long said of the move “Gil has
> demonstrated a commanding knowledge of private security, taking a
> hard-nosed business approach to market anarchism. We’re very pleased
to
> announce Gil is joining the Institute.”
>
> ###
>
> ORGANIZATIONAL SUMMARY
>
> The mission of the Molinari Institute is to promote understanding of
the
> philosophy of Market Anarchism as a sane, consensual alternative to
the
> hypertrophic violence of the State. The Institute takes its name from
> Gustave de Molinari (1819-1912), originator of the theory of Market
> Anarchism.
>
> CONTACT
> Roderick T. Long
> Molinari Institute
> BerserkRL@... <BerserkRL%40yahoo.com>
> http://praxeology.net/molinari.htm
>
>
>

27 April 2009

Gil Guillory named Research Associate

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Libertarian writer and entrepreneur Gil Guillory has been named Research
Associate.

AUBURN, ALABAMA – April 27, 2009 – Libertarian writer and entrepreneur
Gil Guillory has been named Research Associate of the Molinari
Institute. In his role, Guillory will continue his research programme on
a business model for private security, Subscription Patrol and
Restitution.

Guillory has authored, co-authored, and presented papers on Subscription
Patrol and Restitution since 2006. All of the work is licensed under
Creative Commons Attribution, and is available on a web archive.
Guillory has written for strike-the-root.com, anti-state.com,
lewrockwell.com, and mises.org. His most recent publication was “The
Role of Subscription Patrol and Restitution in the Future of Liberty,”
co-authored with Patrick Tinsley, and published in Libertarian Papers.

Molinari Institute President Roderick Long said of the move “Gil has
demonstrated a commanding knowledge of private security, taking a
hard-nosed business approach to market anarchism. We’re very pleased to
announce Gil is joining the Institute.”

###

ORGANIZATIONAL SUMMARY

The mission of the Molinari Institute is to promote understanding of the
philosophy of Market Anarchism as a sane, consensual alternative to the
hypertrophic violence of the State. The Institute takes its name from
Gustave de Molinari (1819-1912), originator of the theory of Market
Anarchism.

CONTACT
Roderick T. Long
Molinari Institute
BerserkRL@...
http://praxeology.net/molinari.htm

C4SS Spring 2009 Fundraising Drive

http://c4ss.org/content/153

CALL FOR PAPERS

The Molinari Society will be hosting its sixth annual symposium in
conjunction with the Eastern Division of the American Philosophical
Association in New York City, December 27-30, 2009.  We hereby invite
the submission of papers on the topic of intellectual property.

Details here:  http://tinyurl.com/b9g677

Roderick

I know Roderick's a fan but his blog doens't have contact info that I
can find.

http://www.dccomics.com/dcu/comics/?cm=10698

Haven't had a chance to read it yet, to see if the author "gets him."
(Neo-Tech, individualist anarchist vs bomb throwing chaos monger with
whiskers but it's good to know DC hasn't completely forgoten the
character.

His appearance in GReen Arrow a couple years ago was a good story.

TRacy Saboe

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

  Kevin Carson named Research Associate at C4SS

Celebrated yet controversial left-libertarian author becomes first
C4SS paid staff member.

http://c4ss.org/content/66

AUBURN, ALABAMA � November 15, 2008 � Center for a Stateless Society �
Kevin Carson, author of Studies in Mutualist Political Economy and a
forthcoming major work on anarchist organizational theory has joined
the Center for a Stateless Society as the Center's first paid staff
member. In his role as Research Associate beginning January 1st of
2009, Carson will be producing quarterly short research studies for
the Center to publish as well as writing news commentary.

C4SS director Brad Spangler said of the move "We're developing a new
fundraising initiative and early on in that process an anonymous donor
stepped up to fund the first quarter of Kevin's research work and the
first month of his news analysis for us. We're very pleased to
announce this, as Carson has been a key figure on the radical end of
the libertarian movement. Supporting his work means he'll be able to
do more and better of what he already does amazingly well."

###

ORGANIZATIONAL SUMMARY
The mission of the Molinari Institute is to promote understanding of
the philosophy of Market Anarchism as a sane, consensual alternative
to the hypertrophic violence of the State. The Institute takes its
name from Gustave de Molinari (1819-1912), originator of the theory of
Market Anarchism. The Center for a Stateless Society is the Molinari
Institute's media center.

CONTACT
Brad Spangler
Center for a Stateless Society
media@...
http://www.c4ss.org/

Basic Cycles Analysis FAQ Q. So, what can we predict
with cycles analysis? A.
Everything... Explore how it's done... Get a free
sample PDF issue of our
Cycles Magazine and a free sample PDF issue of Cycle
Projections �  Register
here: http://cycles.cc/cycles_faq/

It's political spam.

Now you know why the politickyuns exempted themselves from the
so-called "Can Spam" act.

--
Stephen Carville

These guys made it into Barron's Online at:
http://online.barrons.com/article/SB120829364826017219.html
with their Cyclical Predictions! They are also
offering Free Logo T-Shirts and, a chance to win Free
Techsignal Software in an
up coming drawing! Check them Out at:
www.Cycles.cc/welcome.htm Thanks, Tony


      
________________________________________________________________________________\
____
Be a better friend, newshound, and
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now. 
http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ

These guys made it into Barron's Online at:
http://online.barrons.com/article/SB120829364826017219.html
with their Cyclical Predictions! They are also
offering Free Logo T-Shirts and, a chance to win Free
Techsignal Software in an
up coming drawing! Check them Out at:
www.Cycles.cc/welcome.htm Thanks, Tony


      
________________________________________________________________________________\
____
Be a better friend, newshound, and
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now. 
http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ

Likewise here: this list is about radical libertarianism and/or
anarchism.  It's hard to see what all this material about the relative
merits of Obama vs. Clinton has to do with the topic.

Roderick



>>> "(BullDog)" <harry@...> 04/21/08 4:00 PM >>>

I just listened to a podcast from Thom Hartmann for the LAST time. It
was
the only radio host I still listened to sometimes but no more. He quoted
from Daily Kos, which he does frequently and through the entire show he
consistently condemned Hillary Clinton for what I knew to be wrong but
pretty much the anti-Clinton line one hears repeated constantly on the
"liberal" so-called "progressive" blogs as-if it was gospel for the true
believers of which obviously Thom Hartmann is one now. He may have been
more balanced before and I thought he was. But he has this view of Obama
which is totally unrealistic. He obviously is relying on what others are
saying because if he did his own research he might see that there are
other versions than the ones being manufactured by the Hillary Clinton
haters.

And I thought liberal, educated progressives were smarter than that. My
criteria is not consensus with everything I say. I'm not always right
and
I'm the first to admit it (even if a little reluctantly) and I don't
like
everything about Hillary. I didn't marry her and I'm not going to be
living with her, but I rather live with her policies than Obama, who I
see
as egomaniacal and a liar about big issues and very questionable
associations. Hillary can slip but Obama just lies. I'm reminded of the
television ad, which used the mantra, "Where is the beef?" And that is
Obama. If there is substance, it has not yet revealed itself.

I'm glad to see Randy Rhodes got canned for her insulting slurs at
Hillary
Clinton. Malloy was also fired from Air America and is now at Nova M
with
which is still struggling and he doesn't get much air time. I listened a
few times after he was picked up by them and stopped recording his live
feed (he has the nerve to charge for the podcast) in disgust over his
regressive ideology and disdain against Hillary and his anti-Israel
rant.

There are no progressive talk show hosts who oppose Obama except for
Taylor Marsh. Often she goes over the top patting herself on the back,
but
to give credit where credit is due, she is the only one and she is a
gutsy
women. There are a lot of excellent websites, like Larry Johnson's No
Quarter and many others (which I'll have to start listing for those who
want the links). But no radio. Not yet and maybe never. We just seem
determined to self-destruct. When I say we, I mean the Democratic party.
Nader is looking better all the time, even if he doesn't stand a chance
and you notice how little air time anyone has given him. At the moment
he
is just a distraction.

     Hank Roth
     http://pnews.org

P.S. I'm not going to go into detail to explain my position on Israel
again. I will say this however. It isn't a person and it is a democracy
and the propaganda against Israel is as wrong and as filled with hate as
hate against Hillary Clinton and they are both very similar in that they
seem to have the same enemies on the so-called liberal white left.


On the InterNUT since 1982
   (since Arpanet)



------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

This list is for the discusison of radical libertarianism and/or
anarchism.  How is plumping for or against Obama relevant to that
discusison?

Roderick



>>> "(BullDog)" <harry@...> 04/23/08 10:49 AM >>>


"Obama and his supporters brusquely dismiss the drawing of sensible
inferences from these gestures of admiration as guilt by association. In
point of fact, though, the Obamas didnt just associate with Wright. They
subsidized him..."

"Obama falsely conflates `democracy' with `the republican form of
government' that the Founders preferred as an effective barrier to their
ultimate nightmare - popular democracy. He appears not to understand
that
the nation's constitutional fathers saw republican governance as a
bulwark
against democracy and a more reliable protector of `property rights' and
class privilege than monarchical absolutism. He misses and misrepresents
the main reason that James Madison, Alexander Hamilton and other
Founders
argued for a geographically extensive nation-state: to more effectively
preserve the tyranny of the propertied few and keep the threat of
popular
democracy at bay (pp. 87-94)." (Street)

There is a lot that could be said here, like why didn't Obama leave his
church during the 20 years he went there? Why did he subject his
children
to listen to that hate speech? But, we already know the answer. Obama
also
has an anti-progressive-regressive-admiration for Republican governance.
It is true Obama would be transformative - though the transformation
would
be in the wrong direction.

Others are judged by the company they keep.
Why not Obama?

Continued at:
    --> http://pnews.org/ArT/ZuLu/TranS.shtml

------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

1 in 5 Democrats May Cross-Over to McCain
If Obama is Nominee of the Democratic Party
A vote for Obama is a wasted vote.

Republicans are already running ads showing his connections to unsavory
associates and his questionable history and family in Kenya. He will lose.

This is the biggest migration of voters out of one party into the other
party since the War Between the States. Obama will not succeed in a
general election if he defeats Clinton in the primary. If He is nominated
it will take at least another 4 years to recover the White House. Voting
for Obama is throwing the vote away.

See the Crypt for more about the election, Obama and Clinton, Jihadism (Is
Obama a Jihadist?), and other current information to keep you informed:
http://pnews.org/crypt/

You have a choice. Support Clinton, who may well be the next FDR. Support
Obama and the party is over. -
http://pnews.org/news/index.php/CrossOverVoters

"Obama and his supporters brusquely dismiss the drawing of sensible
inferences from these gestures of admiration as guilt by association. In
point of fact, though, the Obamas didnt just associate with Wright. They
subsidized him..."

"Obama falsely conflates `democracy' with `the republican form of
government' that the Founders preferred as an effective barrier to their
ultimate nightmare - popular democracy. He appears not to understand that
the nation's constitutional fathers saw republican governance as a bulwark
against democracy and a more reliable protector of `property rights' and
class privilege than monarchical absolutism. He misses and misrepresents
the main reason that James Madison, Alexander Hamilton and other Founders
argued for a geographically extensive nation-state: to more effectively
preserve the tyranny of the propertied few and keep the threat of popular
democracy at bay (pp. 87-94)." (Street)

There is a lot that could be said here, like why didn't Obama leave his
church during the 20 years he went there? Why did he subject his children
to listen to that hate speech? But, we already know the answer. Obama also
has an anti-progressive-regressive-admiration for Republican governance.
It is true Obama would be transformative - though the transformation would
be in the wrong direction.

Others are judged by the company they keep.
Why not Obama?

Continued at:
    --> http://pnews.org/ArT/ZuLu/TranS.shtml

----- Original Message -----

From: (BullDog)

To: activistic@yahoogroups.com ; americansvoice@yahoogroups.com ; AmericaSpeaks@yahoogroups.com ; Anti_bush_from_the_start@yahoogroups.com ; Bush_Is_A_STINKING_LIAR@yahoogroups.com ; Liberation-News@yahoogroups.com ; molinari-institute@yahoogroups.com ; prometheism-pgroup

Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2008 5:05 AM

Subject: [molinari-institute] 1 in 4 Democrats will Cross-Over If Obama is Nominee

A vote for Obama is a wasted vote.
Republicans are already running ads showing his connections to unsavory
associates and his questionable history and family in Kenya. He will lose.

A Wasted Vote

This is the biggest migration of one voters out of one party into the
other party since War Between the States. Obama will not succeed in a
general election if he defeats Clinton in the primary. If He is nominated
it will take another 4 years to recover the White House, if then. Voting
for Obama is throwing the vote away, which is ironically what Democrats
say about voting for Nader. If you throw it away, it may as well be for
conviction rather than someone who is not a genuine progressive.
And if you think he is you have not read the proof at
http://pnews.org/crypt/

-- With
Nader you will have your say - and the country will listen but only if you
show substantial support for this genuine hero and a real progressive. --

Hank Roth

The following
excerpted from Pew survey:

One in five white Democratic voters said they would cross party lines
to vote for McCain over Obama; that's twice as many as if Clinton were
the nominee.

Meanwhile, 56 percent of voters think Obama's promises are too vague.
Another 43 percent worry he isn't tough enough on foreign affairs.

The Pew survey also found Americans are increasingly optimistic about
progress in Iraq and 47 percent now favor keeping U.S. troops there
until the situation is stable. Pew found that was the highest
percentage support in more than a year. Obama and Clinton are
proposing withdrawing troops while McCain is not.

The survey of 1,508 adults was conducted Feb. 20-24.
Full report: people-press.org/reports/pdf/398.pdf

You have a choice. Support Clinton, who may well be the next FDR.
Support Obama and the party is over.

Hank
http://pnews.org/
Worm Hole

A vote for Obama is a wasted vote.
Republicans are already running ads showing his connections to unsavory
associates and his questionable history and family in Kenya. He will lose.

A Wasted Vote

This is the biggest migration of one voters out of one party into the
other party since War Between the States. Obama will not succeed in a
general election if he defeats Clinton in the primary. If He is nominated
it will take another 4 years to recover the White House, if then. Voting
for Obama is throwing the vote away, which is ironically what Democrats
say about voting for Nader. If you throw it away, it may as well be for
conviction rather than someone who is not a genuine progressive.
    And if you think he is you have not read the proof at
http://pnews.org/crypt/

    -- With
Nader you will have your say - and the country will listen but only if you
show substantial support for this genuine hero and a real progressive. --

               Hank Roth


The following
excerpted from Pew survey:

One in five white Democratic voters said they would cross party lines
to vote for McCain over Obama; that's twice as many as if Clinton were
the nominee.

Meanwhile, 56 percent of voters think Obama's promises are too vague.
Another 43 percent worry he isn't tough enough on foreign affairs.

The Pew survey also found Americans are increasingly optimistic about
progress in Iraq and 47 percent now favor keeping U.S. troops there
until the situation is stable. Pew found that was the highest
percentage support in more than a year. Obama and Clinton are
proposing withdrawing troops while McCain is not.

The survey of 1,508 adults was conducted Feb. 20-24.
      Full report:  people-press.org/reports/pdf/398.pdf


You have a choice. Support Clinton, who may well be the next FDR.
Support Obama and the party is over.

Hank
http://pnews.org/
Worm Hole

maybe this was posted to the wrong yahoo group. i can't imagine any of
us who would be interested in or feel sympathy for mainstream
politicians or liberal radio.

i hope i'm right about that...



                                     b.g.

I just listened to a podcast from Thom Hartmann for the LAST time. It was
the only radio host I still listened to sometimes but no more. He quoted
from Daily Kos, which he does frequently and through the entire show he
consistently condemned Hillary Clinton for what I knew to be wrong but
pretty much the anti-Clinton line one hears repeated constantly on the
"liberal" so-called "progressive" blogs as-if it was gospel for the true
believers of which obviously Thom Hartmann is one now. He may have been
more balanced before and I thought he was. But he has this view of Obama
which is totally unrealistic. He obviously is relying on what others are
saying because if he did his own research he might see that there are
other versions than the ones being manufactured by the Hillary Clinton
haters.

And I thought liberal, educated progressives were smarter than that. My
criteria is not consensus with everything I say. I'm not always right and
I'm the first to admit it (even if a little reluctantly) and I don't like
everything about Hillary. I didn't marry her and I'm not going to be
living with her, but I rather live with her policies than Obama, who I see
as egomaniacal and a liar about big issues and very questionable
associations. Hillary can slip but Obama just lies. I'm reminded of the
television ad, which used the mantra, "Where is the beef?" And that is
Obama. If there is substance, it has not yet revealed itself.

I'm glad to see Randy Rhodes got canned for her insulting slurs at Hillary
Clinton. Malloy was also fired from Air America and is now at Nova M with
which is still struggling and he doesn't get much air time. I listened a
few times after he was picked up by them and stopped recording his live
feed (he has the nerve to charge for the podcast) in disgust over his
regressive ideology and disdain against Hillary and his anti-Israel rant.

There are no progressive talk show hosts who oppose Obama except for
Taylor Marsh. Often she goes over the top patting herself on the back, but
to give credit where credit is due, she is the only one and she is a gutsy
women. There are a lot of excellent websites, like Larry Johnson's No
Quarter and many others (which I'll have to start listing for those who
want the links). But no radio. Not yet and maybe never. We just seem
determined to self-destruct. When I say we, I mean the Democratic party.
Nader is looking better all the time, even if he doesn't stand a chance
and you notice how little air time anyone has given him. At the moment he
is just a distraction.

     Hank Roth
     http://pnews.org

P.S. I'm not going to go into detail to explain my position on Israel
again. I will say this however. It isn't a person and it is a democracy
and the propaganda against Israel is as wrong and as filled with hate as
hate against Hillary Clinton and they are both very similar in that they
seem to have the same enemies on the so-called liberal white left.


On the InterNUT since 1982
   (since Arpanet)