Skip to search.

Breaking News Visit Yahoo! News for the latest.

×Close this window

midatlanticretro · Mid-Atlantic Retro Computing Hobbyists

The Yahoo! Groups Product Blog

Check it out!

Group Information

  • Members: 380
  • Category: Computers
  • Founded: Jan 17, 2005
  • Language: English
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Real people. Real stories. See how Yahoo! Groups impacts members worldwide.

Messages

Advanced
Messages Help
Q-Link   Topic List   < Prev Topic  |  Next Topic >
Summarize Messages | View Threaded Sort by Date v  
#1663 From: Jim Scheef <jscheef@...>
Date: Sat Nov 5, 2005 4:10 pm
Subject: Re: Q-Link - oops!
jscheef
Send Email Send Email
 
Bob and Sridhar,

Well, the **IX command line interface is "retro" (as opposed to "vintage")
because that's where it all started. If you use it today, it's not because
you MUST, but because you want to. "User Friendly is what you know." I use
the command shell in Windows XP when it suits my needs, but I don't try to
configure the Windows DHCP server using the command line. It can be done, but
why would I want to when it's so much easier and faster to use the GUI? Of
course on Linux one has no choice but to edit the config files using vi or
the editor dujour.

CompuServe still exists (sort of) but the old ASCII interface to the fora is
gone. Even the Wizop tools are gone. I will probably not need my copy of
TapCIS anytime soon.

Jim

--- Bob Applegate <bob@...> wrote:

> I've got to agree with this. What's retro about a command line interface?
> I've got
> multiple Xterm sessions open right now at work. Is that site "vintage"
> because of
> the machines they use?
>
> Bob
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Sridhar Ayengar
> To: midatlanticretro@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Monday, October 31, 2005 12:27 PM
> Subject: Re: [midatlanticretro] Q-Link - oops!
>
>
> Jim Scheef wrote:
> > In today's context, this message is a liitle out of the blue. It sat in
> > "drafts" for a long time. I meant to delete it and clicked the wrong
> button.
> > Oh well!
> >
> > ...I really do miss CompuServe, the best of the old online services,
> and
> > freeshell.org is a true "vintage experience".
>
> Why is freeshell.org a vintage experience? I still use a shell to do
> most of my work, both at home *and at work*. I use a shell to make my
> living.
>
> Calling it vintage is calling the CLI outdated is calling UNIX outdated.
>
> Peace... Sridhar
>
>
> SPONSORED LINKS Computer security Field trip
>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
> a.. Visit your group "midatlanticretro" on the web.
>
> b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> midatlanticretro-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
> Service.
>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>




#1634 From: Sridhar Ayengar <ploopster@...>
Date: Mon Oct 31, 2005 6:30 pm
Subject: Re: Q-Link - oops!
narayanayengar
Send Email Send Email
 
Bob Applegate wrote:
> I've got to agree with this. What's retro about a command line
> interface? I've got
> multiple Xterm sessions open right now at work. Is that site "vintage"
> because of
> the machines they use?

They use Alphaservers running NetBSD. Those aren't vintage either.

They do run a good service, though.

Peace... Sridhar



#1633 From: "Bob Applegate" <bob@...>
Date: Mon Oct 31, 2005 6:14 pm
Subject: Re: Q-Link - oops!
bobk2ut
Send Email Send Email
 
I've got to agree with this.  What's retro about a command line interface?  I've got
multiple Xterm sessions open right now at work.  Is that site "vintage" because of
the machines they use?
 
Bob
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2005 12:27 PM
Subject: Re: [midatlanticretro] Q-Link - oops!

Jim Scheef wrote:
> In today's context, this message is a liitle out of the blue. It sat in
> "drafts" for a long time. I meant to delete it and clicked the wrong button.
> Oh well!
>
> ...I really do miss CompuServe, the best of the old online services, and
> freeshell.org is a true "vintage experience".

Why is freeshell.org a vintage experience?  I still use a shell to do
most of my work, both at home *and at work*.  I use a shell to make my
living.

Calling it vintage is calling the CLI outdated is calling UNIX outdated.

Peace...  Sridhar

#1632 From: William Pechter <bpechter@...>
Date: Mon Oct 31, 2005 5:29 pm
Subject: Re: Q-Link - oops!
bpechter
Send Email Send Email
 
There's a few old CIS users out here who miss it tonight and new the
end of computing as we know it occurred not with Windows/DOS but with
the AOL buyout of the CIS name.

Here's to MNET11 8-)

--- Jim Scheef <jscheef@...> wrote:

> In today's context, this message is a liitle out of the blue. It sat
> in
> "drafts" for a long time. I meant to delete it and clicked the wrong
> button.
> Oh well!
>
> ...I really do miss CompuServe, the best of the old online services,
> and
> freeshell.org is a true "vintage experience".
>
> Jim
>
> --- Jim Scheef <jscheef@...> wrote:
>
> > Ah, if only someone could resurect the old text-based CompuServe. I
> miss
> > the
> > comraderie of the forums... Using a 2400bps modem... Downloading
> messages
> > using TapCIS... Paying $24/hour to connect...
> >
> > Oh for the good old days!
> >
> > BTW, if you miss a green-screen UNIX system, try
> http://freeshell.org/. A
> > limited but still useful UNIX shell account is free and for $1 you
> get more
> > complete shell account functionality for life.
> >
> > Jim
> >
> > --- billdeg@... wrote:
> >
> > > I have a number of the original Q-Link disks, I wish I could dial
> in
> > > directly, that'd be even better.
> > > Bill
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
>




#1631 From: Sridhar Ayengar <ploopster@...>
Date: Mon Oct 31, 2005 5:27 pm
Subject: Re: Q-Link - oops!
narayanayengar
Send Email Send Email
 
Jim Scheef wrote:
> In today's context, this message is a liitle out of the blue. It sat in
> "drafts" for a long time. I meant to delete it and clicked the wrong button.
> Oh well!
>
> ...I really do miss CompuServe, the best of the old online services, and
> freeshell.org is a true "vintage experience".

Why is freeshell.org a vintage experience? I still use a shell to do
most of my work, both at home *and at work*. I use a shell to make my
living.

Calling it vintage is calling the CLI outdated is calling UNIX outdated.

Peace... Sridhar



#1630 From: Jim Scheef <jscheef@...>
Date: Mon Oct 31, 2005 4:33 pm
Subject: Re: Q-Link - oops!
jscheef
Send Email Send Email
 
In today's context, this message is a liitle out of the blue. It sat in
"drafts" for a long time. I meant to delete it and clicked the wrong button.
Oh well!

...I really do miss CompuServe, the best of the old online services, and
freeshell.org is a true "vintage experience".

Jim

--- Jim Scheef <jscheef@...> wrote:

> Ah, if only someone could resurect the old text-based CompuServe. I miss
> the
> comraderie of the forums... Using a 2400bps modem... Downloading messages
> using TapCIS... Paying $24/hour to connect...
>
> Oh for the good old days!
>
> BTW, if you miss a green-screen UNIX system, try http://freeshell.org/. A
> limited but still useful UNIX shell account is free and for $1 you get more
> complete shell account functionality for life.
>
> Jim
>
> --- billdeg@... wrote:
>
> > I have a number of the original Q-Link disks, I wish I could dial in
> > directly, that'd be even better.
> > Bill
> >
>
>
>




#1629 From: Jim Scheef <jscheef@...>
Date: Mon Oct 31, 2005 4:25 pm
Subject: Re: Q-Link
jscheef
Send Email Send Email
 
Ah, if only someone could resurect the old text-based CompuServe. I miss the
comraderie of the forums... Using a 2400bps modem... Downloading messages
using TapCIS... Paying $24/hour to connect...

Oh for the good old days!

BTW, if you miss a green-screen UNIX system, try http://freeshell.org/. A
limited but still useful UNIX shell account is free and for $1 you get more
complete shell account functionality for life.

Jim

--- billdeg@... wrote:

> I have a number of the original Q-Link disks, I wish I could dial in
> directly, that'd be even better.
> Bill
>





#1393 From: Jim Scheef <jscheef@...>
Date: Fri Sep 30, 2005 9:58 pm
Subject: Re: Q-Link
jscheef
Send Email Send Email
 
Ah, if only someone could resurect the old text-based CompuServe. I miss the
comraderie of the forums... Using a 2400bps modem... Downloading messages
using TapCIS... Paying $24/hour to connect...

Oh for the good old days!

BTW, if you miss a green-screen UNIX system, try http://freeshell.org/. A
limited but still useful UNIX shell account is free and for $1 you get more
complete shell account functionality for life.

Jim

--- billdeg@... wrote:

> I have a number of the original Q-Link disks, I wish I could dial in
> directly, that'd be even better.
> Bill
>





#1372 From: billdeg@...
Date: Thu Sep 29, 2005 7:32 pm
Subject: Re: Q-Link
billdeg
Send Email Send Email
 
I have a number of the original Q-Link disks, I wish I could dial in
directly, that'd be even better.
Bill



#1358 From: "relayer" <relayer@...>
Date: Thu Sep 29, 2005 7:22 pm
Subject: Q-Link
relayer
Send Email Send Email
 
How about some retro online services?

I just got done trying out the remake of Quantum Link. A Commodore 64
online service that was the predecessor to today's AOL.

http://www.quantum-link.org/

You can use an emulator, or a true C64 with a serial interface to a
modern PC. For those that could afford to use the original Q-Link,
it's all the same. It'll even use the same Q-Link disk image if you
have one. Some of the services aren't implemented yet, but you get
some games, e-mail, and the People Connection chat room.

It's still beta, and growing..... A great trip down memory lane.

They plan to implement Wikipedia as the Q-Link encyclopedia, IRC
connectivity for multi room chat, and RSS for news feeds. All this
would be done at their server but be a transparent function of Q-Link.






 
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright © 2010 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines NEW - Help