Controversy arose over the unregulated sub 70kg category, which the BMAA was
keen to maintain to provide low-cost, low-performance machines for those not
looking to use more expensive two-seaters having once obtained their flying
licence. The CAA was to review the position after a special interest group
devised necessary quality controls. However through his own involvement with
Mainair's production of sub-70kg machines group member John Hudson wrote to the
CAA about the inability of anyone to build a safe machine within this category
where so much emphasis was put on weight reduction, instigating a full CAA
investigation. Flight Line and the Newsletter became full of debate on this
issue. Later in the year members learnt that the sub-70 kg exemption was to be
withdrawn.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
From "The BMAA 1986 & 87." Controversy arose over the unregulated sub 70kg category, which the BMAA was keen to maintain to provide low-cost, low-performance...
I am not sure what your intent or personal thoughts are Mike on this post? However: History has proven that John was quite mistaken. The sub 70 machines that...
Could it also be added that the last 20 years have seen many changes in the availability of high-strength lightweight materials, of high performance power...
I didn't know John Hudson so may do him a disservice here.. but could it be that he had a commercial interest in there not being a sub-70 class of aircraft? ...
... I've got copies of all the correspondence on this affair, dating from 1985/6, including a copy of the original John Hudson letter to the CAA. John always...
... Quite coincidentally and with no relation to this post, I was reviewing aviation safety statistics this morning. Here are some relevant numbers for the...
Quite coincidentally and with no relation to this post, I was reviewing aviation safety statistics this morning. Here are some relevant numbers for the period...
... The last figure was added by me, as I know that there have been no sub-70kg fatals, and certainly none in the period in question................... Jeremy...
There! And I thought my copy'd been edited! ... From: microlights@yahoogroups.com [mailto:microlights@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of jeremy_harris_uk Sent: 20...
David Bremner wrote: surely someone should look at the bigger picture? *True, and also there's another factor:- Microlights tend to do short flights, gliders...
Hi Kev, With the price of one hour in a spamcan I would guess their average flight is shorter than a microlight. Mark P................ Kev Armstrong...
I think the 'per flight factor' (or perhaps per movement is more accurate) is correct for overall accidents, however I don't think the correlation can be...
Paul Dewhurst wrote: Recent fatals have included mid airs, in flight structural failure, spinning, and getting it very wrong following engine failure. So not ...
Errm, the one we have been talking about for months?? I am not saying that pilot error didn't play its part in the break up though (in case you are trying to...
... *Debate on this is (correctly) prohibited Paul, and both you, Bob and everyone else must guard against accidentally posting anything that relates to, or...
27 January 2004, Sirocco, in-flight breakup of the tailplane leading to loss of the aircraft and pilot. Because of this the tech office was forced to ground...
Whatever the cause, the effect to Styx was a machine that was in several separate parts when it hit the ground. Therefore there is no escaping that it suffered...
... ???? I don't get what you're on about Paul. I'd welcome an explanation as to why my reply, giving a perfectly correct answer to Kev's question provoked...
... *Hello Bob, my goodness you really are doing an excellent job of supervising this group, what is this all about then? Have you read this edition of the...
Spot on Joan, but,,,,,,,,,,,and it is a big but, this just emphasises the fact that its not the technology that's to blame for our present predicament. I am...