Madame Blavatsky continually reminds us in all her writings that we are
responsible for our own suffering, and that this suffering is a result of
our going against the Law. In The Secret Doctrine she writes (II, 705):
"We stand bewildered before the mystery of our own making, and the riddles
of life that we will not solve, and then accuse the great Sphinx of devouring
us. But verily there is not an accident in our lives, not a misshapen day,
or a misfortune, that could not be traced back to our own doings in this
or in another life. If one breaks the laws of Harmony, or, as a theosophical
writer expresses it, the `laws of life', one must be prepared to fall into
the chaos oneself has produced."
If we are not ourselves prepared to forgive those who wrong us, we have
no right to expect the remission of our own sins. This in fact is a spiritual
law.
Noela Evans
Challenge is a dragon with a gift in its mouth... Tame the dragon and the gift is yours.
H.P. Blavatsky, Secret Doctrine (I-325)
The spoken word has a potency not only unknown to, but even unsuspected and
naturally disbelieved in, by our modern `sages'. Because sound and
rhythm are closely related to the four elements of the ancients; and
because such or another vibration in the air is sure to awaken the corresponding
Powers, union with which produces good or bad results, as the case may be.
No student was ever allowed to recite, historical, religious, or real events
of any kind, in so many unmistakable words, lest the Powers connected with
the event should be once more attracted. Such events were narrated only during
initiation, and every student had to record them in corresponding symbols,
drawn out of his own mind and examined later by his Master, before they were
finally accepted.
Editorial
Just wanted to wish you all a very merry, or happy, holiday season.
The term medium, when not applied simply to things and objects, is supposed to be a person through whom the action of another person or being is either manifested or transmitted. Spiritualists believing in communications with, disembodied spirits, and that these can manifest through,
or impress sensitives to transmit "messages" from them, regard mediumship as a blessing and a great privilege. We Theosophists, on the other hand,
who do not believe in the "communion of spirits" as Spiritualists do, regard
the gift as one of the most dangerous of abnormal nervous diseases. A medium is simply one in whose personal Ego, or terrestrial mind, (psuche), the percentage of "astral" light so preponderates as to impregnate with it their whole physical constitution. Every organ and cell thereby is attuned,
so to speak, and subjected to an enormous and abnormal tension. The
mind is ever on the plane of, and quite immersed in, that deceptive light whose soul is divine, but whose body - the light waves on the lower planes, infernal; for they are but the black and disfigured reflections of the
earth's memories. The untrained eye of the poor sensitive cannot pierce
the dark mist, the dense fog of the terrestrial emanations, to see beyond
in the radiant field of the eternal truths. His vision is out of focus.
His senses, accustomed from his birth, like those of a native of the London
slums, to stench and filth, to the unnatural distortions of sights and images
tossed on the kaleidoscopic waves of the astral plane - are unable to discern
the true from the false. And thus, the pale soulless corpses moving
in the trackless fields of "Kama loka," appear to him the living images of
the "dear departed" ones; the broken echoes of once human voices, passing
through his mind, suggest to him well coordinated phrases, which he repeats,
in ignorance that their final form and polish were received in the innermost
depths of his own brain-factory. And hence the sight and the hearing
of that which if seen in its true nature would have struck the medium's heart
cold with horror, now fills him with a sense of beatitude and confidence.
He really believes that the immeasurable vistas displayed before him are
the real spiritual world, the abode of the blessed disembodied angels.
We describe the broad main features and facts of mediumship, there being no room in this article for exceptional.
It is impossible to say whether it was merely sentimentalism or some other reason that led the translators of the Authorized Version of the New Testament to give the rendering of the angels' Christmas message which they did. In any case! they did religion a poor service, for religion has difficulty enough making its way in the world without being loaded with the reputation of sentimentalism. The tendency was established however to make Jesus a sentimentalist surrounded by sentimental angels and sentimental apostles. Jesus had hard and bitter things to say about Scribes, Pharisees, Hypocrites and Generations of Vipers. In practice these coarse words are not supposed to have anything to do with Nice Church People. This mis-direction served
to account in no small measure for the ill success of the Church in this
Wicked World. Yet these same sentimentalists would damn all humanity to hell for the sake of a dogma. The reversal of New Testament teaching is in fact the mission of the Church. Let us take an important example.
In the first chapter of Genesis we read in the brief sketch of the beginning of things how the seven Elohim, the Creative Gods, made man in their image. This was the beginning of physical and psychic man. In the first chapter of
the Gospel of John we read how the spiritual element of Life became involved with physical man. "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God." The Word is the Logos or Verbum, the Christos or Universal Christ principle, "In him was Life, and the Life was the Light of men." verse 7, "That was the true Light, which Lighteth every man that cometh into the world." Some churches argue, even in face of this, that the Bible or Jesus is the Word and the Light. The 9th verse makes it clear that every human being
has the light within him of the Christos, the True Light, and it depends upon
each one for himself how he uses and develops it so that he may become a
perfected Son of God, as they Power imparted to him enables him to be. There
is no mystery nor priest craft about this, but merely the exercize of one's
own free will to follow the universal inner Light as men have done in all
ages. It is this birth of the spiritual life of the Christ Child in the hearts
of men and women just awakening to the True Inner Light that we celebrate
at Christmas, as the Druids did at Yuletide and other great religions in various
festivals according to their fashion. The Angels wished Peace on earth to
men of Good Will, men who had begun to unite their wills with the Cosmic
Will, men stern as Justice, merciful and compassionate as Love, and impartial
as Divine Truth.
106 years ago
anonymous internet communication
This information should be shared with the school kids of today. I can hardly comprehend these statistics, I wonder what they would think about these bits of history.
Just think, one hundred years today could be the life span of a normal person.
This ought to boggle your mind, I know it did mine! The year is 1903...one hundred years ago...what a difference a century makes! Here are some of the U.S. statistics for 1903:
The average life expectancy in the U.S. was 47 years.
Only 14 Percent of the homes in the U.S. had a bathtub.
Only 8 percent of the homes had a telephone.
A three-minute call from Denver to New York City cost eleven dollars.
There were only 8,000 cars in the U.S., and only 144 miles of paved roads...
The maximum speed limit in most cities was 10 mph.
Alabama, Mississippi, Iowa, and Tennessee were each more heavily populated than California. With a mere 1.4 million residents, California was only the 21st- most populous state in the Union.
The tallest structure in the world was the Eiffel Tower.
The average wage in the U.S. was 22 cents an hour.
The average U.S. worker made between $200 and $400 per year.
A competent accountant could expect to earn $2000 per year, a dentist $2,500 per year, a veterinarian between $1,500 and $4,000 per year, and a mechanical engineer about $5,000 per year.
More than 95 percent of all births in the U.S. took place at home.
Ninety percent of all U.S. physicians had no college education. Instead, they attended medical schools, many of which were condemned in the press and by the government as "substandard."
Sugar cost four cents a pound. Eggs were fourteen cents a dozen. Coffee cost fifteen cents a pound.
Most women only washed their hair once a month, and used borax or egg yolks for shampoo.
Canada passed a law prohibiting poor people from entering the country for any reason.
The five leading causes of death in the U.S. were:
Pneumonia and influenza
Tuberculosis
Diarrhea
Heart disease
Stroke
The American flag had 45 stars. Arizona, Oklahoma, New Mexico, Hawaii,and Alaska hadn't been admitted to the Union yet.
The population of Las Vegas, Nevada, was 30.
Crossword puzzles, canned beer, and iced tea hadn't been invented.
There was no Mother's Day or Father's Day.
One in ten U.S. adults couldn't read or write. Only 6 percent of all Americans had graduated high school.
Marijuana, heroin, and morphine were all available over the counter at corner drugstores. According to one pharmacist, "Heroin clears the complexion, gives buoyancy to the mind, regulates the stomach and the bowels, and is, in fact, a perfect guardian of health."
18 percent of households in the U.S. had at least one full-time servant or domestic.
There were only about 230 reported murders in the entire U.S.
And I received this from someone else without typing it myself, and send it to a dozen people in a matter of seconds! Just think what it will be like in another 100 years? It boggles the mind!
Previous issues of Lucifer7 can be found at the online index of
Lucifer7
I want to thank all of you who support me, whether financially,
by asking questions, commenting or just be reading and enjoying what I
put online. To
those who wonder: no, I don't mind if people link to
my website(s). In fact: it's appreciated. For instance: my blog will
find new readers faster if people share it with
friends and link to it.
Love will arise like the sun at dawn, when the heart opens itself, free of all rigidities and self-centredness.
Karma as a first-rate method of avoiding any responsibility for needed action.
"Karma will attend to that" is a frequent remark from these side-steppers. They forget that every man is an incarnation of his own Karma and that if he is brought into the presence of conditions that call for action it is his
Karma, the result of his own past actions, to take his place in the arena. To shirk the call is just as bad as the plea of Cain, "Am I my brother's keeper?"
Karma attends to nothing. Men are the agents of Karma, and it is for
them to see that Karma, that is, Justice, is done. (Canadian Theosophist,
Vol. 24, #5)
Find the god in your own heart and you will understand by direct intuition
what all the great teachers, real mystics, true philosophers and inspired
men have been trying to tell you by the tortuous method of using words.
Only those who do the will of the Masters are reckoned as deserving
their notice; aspirations, desires, promises go for nothing. What is
that will? Well, it is simply to free your mind from vain and earthly
desires, and to work at the work before you always lending a helping
hand to others. Get rid of anger, vanity, pride, resentfulness,
ambition and REALLY LOSE THEM, and you have then made the first step
towards the understanding of the occult; with these feelings latent in
the heart it is not possible to make one single step in magic.
SPACE. is the densest actuality conceivable; its density is absolute. There are no openings in SPACE; its continuity extends throughout duration.
All manifestations take place within SPACE.
SPACE, has no boundaries; but each and every Soul is the centre of SPACE.
SPACE, has no dimensions; but all dimensions exist in SPACE.
SPACE, has no substance; but every substance from the most ethereal to the most material, exists in SPACE.
SPACE, has no attributes; yet every attribute is therein contained.
We may wipe out existence, time, consciousness, force, matter, but it is not possible physically or metaphysically, to wipe out SPACE.
Nothing can be added to SPACE; nothing taken from it.
SPACE, does not evolve or change; yet all changes, and all evolution from the lowest to the highest, from the simplest to the most complex, take place within SPACE.
SPACE, is the one eternal, immutable, indestructible
actuality; indivisible, inconceivable in its totality, having no beginning
and no end.
SPACE, always has been, is, and always will be.
Ariyadhamma, From the Maha-Bodhi for May-June, 1946.
Once a learned friend of a skeptical turn of mind with a penchant turn
for discussion said with magisterial emphasis:
Excuse me Ariyadhamma, your Buddhism is not a religion at all, it is only
a system of philosophy.
A.D.: Thank you for the small mercy my friend; but pray:
How do you define the word religion?
Friend: My definition in terms of the derivation of the word is:
A binding or an abiding relationship between man and his God.
A.D.: I am free to admit that according to your definition, Buddhism
is not a religion, as it has been put together without the concepts of God
and Soul. On the contrary, I claim this very reason as Buddhism's chief
merit..
Friend: Well then on your part, what is your definition of religion?
A.D.: As for myself, I define religion simply as a mode of salvation
from the ills of life.
Friend: That in all conscience is wide enough to include all religions
of all time, and covers even Mathew Arnold's famous definition of religion
as: "Morality touched with emotion". I must now admit that in
terms of your definition Buddhism is a religion par excellence.
A.D.: Bear with me my friend; Why do you say Buddhism is only
a philosophy?
Friend: For the simple reason that you Buddhists are experts in
philosophizing.
A.D.: That may be a good ground for calling Buddhists mere philosophists,
but not for saying that Buddhism is only a philosophy.
Friend: Surely you can give the reason yourself better than I can
hope to do. Do oblige without more ado.
A.D.: The Four Noble Truths form the basis on which, as you know,
is founded the whole system. The first Three Truths formulate the Philosophy
and the Fourth Truth supplies the ethic or morality. So that all the
Four Truths taken together make Buddhism a perfect system of religion.
Friend: I am afraid you are all too brief. Do you mind expatiating
a little more?
A.D.: The crowning glory of the Buddha's supreme Enlightenment is
without doubt the unique doctrine of Paticcasamuppada or Dependent Genesis,
with its mind-staggering corollary of The Patthana, containing Twenty-four
Modes of Correlation, which are elaborated with an infinitude of detail -
The Paticca-Samuppada taken in regular order is an exposition of the philosophy
of the First and Second Noble Truths of Sorrow and the cause of Sorrow.
So it is aptly called Vatta-Kata or description of the wheel of life.
Paticcasamuppada, viewed in reverse order explains the Third Noble Truth
of the Cessation of Sorrow -
Now my friend, you will find more than enough of philosophy in Buddhism.
Friend: I have a surfeit of it already. The difficulty is
to digest it all.
A.D.: Nil desperandum, my friend. Remember that if a thing
is easy, it is certainly not worthwhile. The converse is equally true.
Friend: I prefer a thing, he who runs may lead - something less
high-brow.
A.D.: I wish you better luck next time, but seek it elsewhere.
You seem to be in a hurry. I will not detain you. Au revoir!
Friend: Cheerio!
Previous issues of Lucifer7 can be found at the online index of
Lucifer7
I want to thank all of you who support me, whether financially,
by asking questions, commenting or just be reading and enjoying what I
put online. To
those who wonder: no, I don't mind if people link to
my website(s). In fact: it's appreciated. For instance: my blog will
find new readers faster if people share it with
friends and link to it.
The love which neither seeks, expects nor hopes for anything in return is a pure radiation whose benign light falls on everyone within its area.
Rabindranath Tagore
"I do not put my faith in any institution, but in the individuals all over the world who think clearly, feel nobly, and act rightly, thus becoming the channels of moral truth."
In speaking of S. Paul as an occultist, it may be well first of all to define the word "occultism," which otherwise may easily lead to controversy. By "occultist" I do not mean a magician; but, in the sense that S. Paul was initiated into the Mysteries, he was an occultist, and his teaching is undoubtedly founded upon the mystery-religions which, in his day, existed all over the world.
One great basic idea is at the back of all his teaching: It is that of Christhood. And if we analyse this teaching in its entirety we find that what he really taught was a great hope for humanity. In his Christology we see clearly outlined the two aspects of the Universal Christ,
and the Historic Christ, or Jesus, the Personal Master of S. Paul. In
his conception the Universal Christ is focussed in the Person of Jesus, and
so, to understand this conception, it is necessary to study both these aspects,
always remembering that although S. Paul expressed a very definite theology
he had no definite system, and hardly ever attempted to define his terms.
His teaching is contained in a series of letters mostly circular, written
to Churches which he could not always visit personally; and these messages
were passed on. This absence of definition creates a real difficulty
from a theological point of view, for often an interpretation has been given
to his teaching which certainly he himself never dreamt of.
If we examine the schools called "heretical" - the works
of the great doctors of the Gnosis - we find that S. Paul uses all their
technical terms; but whether he gives them the same meaning it is not
always possible to say. A characteristic feature of his theology is
the use of the pairs of opposites: He never speaks of one thing without
at the same time mentioning its opposite. These opposites can be classified
under the two broad divisions of Universal and Particular. Under the
Universal, we find the Flesh opposed to the Spirit, Sin to Grace, Death to
Life, Wrath to Glory. Under the Particular, we find "the Old Man,"
Adam, opposed to the "New Man," Jesus; the Old Law opposed to the Gospel
or New Law, the "natural body" to the "spiritual body," and "works" to "faith."
In some of these sayings he may possibly refer to some previous teachings orally given.
We must remember that, although S. Paul was a Jew, he
could not wholly escape from the Eastern influences prevalent in his day: and his native city of Tarsus was itself probably a meeting-place for Eastern and Western philosophies. Thus we find in him a mixture of the Gnostic and of the Pharisee, a strain of Hellenistic mysticism grafted on to the Rabbinical
teaching. But superadded to this is his probable initiation into the Mysteries
of Jesus.
S. Paul followed very closely upon Jesus. That in such a brief space of time S. Paul's Christology could have been so elaborated and so matured is one of the problems of History.
Let us now consider his doctrine of the Old and the New Adam.
To S.. Paul, Christ was the raison d'etre of all this teaching; and when he speaks of "the fullness" of Christ - a word which is a mystery-term - he means by it the contents of the highest plane in the universe, the plane of the Pleroma, or highest archetypal plane, on which dwells the Universal Christ. The Individual Christ is the expression, in physical manifestation, of the Christ of the Pleroma. Thus we may say that the conception of Man, the Microcosm - microcosm of the spiritual Macrocosm - is the keynote of S. Paul's teaching: the highest is reflected in the lowest; the Universal Christ is revealed in the New Adam, Jesus-Christ. In Him is therefore the promise of spiritual enfoldment for all the children of men.
This idea of a spiritual evolution is not Jewish, but distinctly Hellenistic. In the original Greek text the word "old" has the meaning obsolete; S. Paul adjures his disciples to "put off the obsolete man," or that personality which they had outgrown, and to put on the "new man," the new personality in Jesus-Christ. In dealing with this subject he often quotes the Kabbalah, to some of the passages of which - notably in I Cor. xv, 45 - he gives a mystical interpretation. Yet while the Kabbalah speaks of four Adams, S. Paul only mentions two, the two who stand at the opposite poles, the "new" and the "old", the regenerated man and the man of sin. The Kabbalah may be said to describe the involution of man, while S. Paul describes his evolution. The Kabbalah speaks of
the first Adam as the Heavenly Man, the Archetype, who is collectively the
Crown, Kepher, the Highest Three of the Ten Sephiroth or Elohim.
The second Adam is collectively the Lowest Seven of the Ten, or the Hierarchy that fashion Man on the lower levels.
The third Adam is dual - Adam-Eve - and the fourth Adam is Physical Man, clothed in skin. The "Garden of Eden" is not on earth, but on the plane of noumena - a fact we should bear in mind when we attempt to square the Book
of Genesis with modern science.
Thus the Kabbalah is concerned with the downward arc, or the descent of Spirit in Matter, while S. Paul attempts to complete the circle, and deals with the upward arc, the return of Spirit to the Godhead whence it came forth.
With regard to the vestments, or vehicles, assumed by
the Spirit, S. Paul considers only three - the "natural body," or body of
the resurrection, the psychic or soul-body acting as a link between the two.
In II Corinthians, v, 1-5, he uses the metaphor of putting one garment over
another, the spiritual over the physical; he evidently does not, in
this passage, mean a physical death and resurrection, but a transmutation
of the physical into the spiritual, the earthly into the heavenly. For
him "the resurrection" is a spiritual state, and - he almost apologizes for
not yet having himself "attained to the resurrection," (Phil. iii, 10-15). Thus his "resurrection from the dead" is actually a change in consciousness, the transformation of the carnal man into the spiritual, in other words, the
attainment of Christhood, the "Christ within" that is "our hope of glory."
Previous issues of Lucifer7 can be found at the online index of
Lucifer7
I want to thank all of you who support me, whether financially,
by asking questions, commenting or just be reading and enjoying what I
put online. To
those who wonder: no, I don't mind if people link to
my website(s). In fact: it's appreciated. For instance: my blog will
find new readers faster if people share it with
friends and link to it.
The Trouble of the Body, H. Fielding Hall, The Inward Light
Do not let the trouble of the body eat into the mind. Keep your mind
free. Sometimes this courage and this happiness will cure the ill. The
body is not always master of the mind; it should be the servant. The
mind should be
the master. The will should dominate. It can control in many things the
body;
it can make cures of illness. The West has suddenly discovered this as
a
new thing; the East knew it always . . . . If there was no evil, only
good,
how could the will be strengthened? If his way was always clear before
him
he would degenerate to a machine that runs on rails. Evil is necessary,
and the same power that made the good made the evil also, for its own
righteous purpose. Therefore this world is not the Devil's world, but
God's. It is full of beautiful things made for our happiness; it is
full of evil things to make us strong.
Spiritual truth must henceforth stand upon a scientific foundation;
it
must never be afraid of any question, and it must not dismiss the
honest
investigator as irreligious because he wants proof before he will
believe.
Christianity and Materialism
From Theosophy and the Modern World, Conducted by F. B. Housser
"The special feature of Christianity has been, it
seems to me, its teaching that God is no mere perfect self-existent
being, but present
in and not separated from the evil of our world. The conception
of
a perfect world and an all-embracing perfect God, might seem at first
sight
possible; but the actual world is anything but perfect, and the
existence
of an imperfect world would be a standing contradiction to the idea of
a
perfect God."
This is a passage taken from J.S. Haldane's new
book "The Philosophy of a Biologist" published by the Clarendon
Press. "Christianity must rid itself of materialism and be ready
to cope with materialism and any
other form of anti-religious ideas, if it is to survive and win again
the
adherence of a large part of the educated class," says Haldane.
Here, it seems to us, Professor Haldane has
placed his
finger on the heart of the post-war attitude of the western world which
is
wrecking the orthodox Christian church and denuding it of the best
minds in
the community. One of the chief causes of the remarkable spread
of
Christian Science is that it has given many people an answer to the
problem of a perfect God and an imperfect world. Mrs. Eddy, the
founder of the
Christian Science movement cut "the knot of contrariety" simply by
insisting that everything is perfect and that all imperfection is an
illusion created by mortal mind which itself, she contended, is an
illusion. This receives the approval of those who have sufficient
faith to believe it in spite of what they see around them in the world
but the great majority of people find themselves unable to accept it as
a full and complete explanation.
Theosophy's Answer
Theosophy meets the apparent contradiction of an
apparently imperfect God and an imperfect world by the elaborate system
of cosmology outlined in the first volume of the Secret Doctrine, where
it is shown (p. 33) that the unknown Essence - misnamed God - did not
create an-thing. As the Buddhists maintain "there is no creator
but an infinitude of creative powers which collectively form the
eternal substance, the essence of which is inscrutable - hence not a
subject of speculation for any true philosopher."
"Upon the inauguration of an active period," says
the Secret Doctrine, "an expansion of this Divine Essence from without
inward and from within outward, occurs in obedience to eternal and
immutable law, and the phenomenal or visible universe is the ultimate
result of a long chain of cosmical forces thus progressively set in
motion."
"Go on saying our planet and man were created,"
says a passage in the Mahatma Letters (p. 75) "and you will be fighting
against hard facts forever, analyzing and losing time over trifling
details - unable to even grasp the whole. But once admit that our
planet and ourselves are no more creations than the iceberg now before
me, but that both planets and man are states for a given time;
and that their present appearance geological and anthropological is
transitory and but a condition concomitant of that stage of evolution
at which they have arrived in a descending cycle - and all will be
well."
The Alternative
These are startling ideas to one trained to think
in terms of the church's idea of God and creation. To deny a
creator and an initial creation is to be classed as an atheist, a term
usually applied in ignorance by those bent on discrediting the one
charged. "It is in
those illusions that man looks upon as sacred that he has to search out
the
source of that multitude of evils which is the great curse of humanity
and
that almost overwhelms mankind." (Mahatma Letters, p. 57).
The idea of God as the creator of the phenomenal
universe is "one of those illusions that man looks upon as
sacred." The Doctrine, as the above passages indicate, declares
that the physical universe, as we know it, is merely a state of being,
an imperfect state compared to the states from which it has
materialized, and that nothing called God, but many orders of beings -
some higher and some lower than man - took part in its creation - if
creation it can be called.. This was the belief of Plato and other
ancient philosophers, and of all initiates into the ancient mysteries.
Those who argue that a just and perfect God
created the world and humanity as it is, have to meet the difficulty of
explaining the presence of so much imperfection and injustice in the
world around us, without debasing the God they would uphold.
Previous issues of Lucifer7 can be found at the online index of
Lucifer7
I want to thank all of you who support me, whether financially,
by asking questions, commenting or just be reading and enjoying what I
put online. To
those who wonder: no, I don't mind if people link to
my website(s). In fact: it's appreciated. For instance: my blog will
find new readers faster if people share it with
friends and link to it.
New Online
Short Quotes Mind, H.P. Blavatsky
Averting a Third War, Jiddu Krishnamurti
The Theosophical Attitude to Life
New Online
New on All Considering
BTW - for those of you reading my blog by feedreader and wondering why
you haven't been receiving any updates... the feed is now at:
http://feeds.feedburner.com/AllConsidering Has been for some time, but
a reader of my blog alerted me to the fact that 27 people are still
subscribed to my old feed. This is not really a problem, as the old
feed redirects to the new feed anyhow. So everybody should be kept up
to date. Still - if you want the latest feed, please change your
subscription.
I'm continuing to archive material that has disappeared from other
theosophical websites. This month I found some articles of historical
and occult interest by the founder of the Theosophical Society: Henry S. Olcott and by and about Geoffrey Hodson.
Y. Y. in the New Statesman (London): I have now come to the
point of disbelieving almost all scandalous stories upon instinct. If I
am given details of a famous woman's love affairs. I immediately
conclude that she leads a life of saintly chastity. If I hear that an
eminent surgeon is a hopeless drunkard, I am
convinced that he is a teetotaler. If I am told that a great
general is a notorious coward, I see him in my mind's eye as a lion of
courage. Nor is this attitude so unreasonable as it seems. The one
thing we may be certain of in regard to stories of the eminent is that
most of them are lies. Lies are told about the great because people
like to believe lies about the great. It drags the great down to the
common level, and is a perverted expression of the passion for equality.
Dhammapada, Translation Juan Mascaro, ch 1
19 If a man speaks many holy words but he speaks and he does not, this
thoughtless man cannot enjoy the life of holiness: he is like a cowherd
who counts the cows of his master.
20 Whereas if a man speaks but a few holy words and yet he lives the
life of those words, free from passion and hate and illusion - with
right vision and a mind free, craving nothing both now and hereafter -
the life of this man is a life of holiness.
BLISS is called the highest Divine attribute. Hence
it is Eternal, beyond Space and Time. Happiness is the human
counterpart. Who is happy? A man permeated with
kindness, radiating kindness, disturbing no one's peace. No
unkindness exists for such a one. He preaches the gospel of
kindness. So does also every unkind person by
contrast.
Mind is a name given to the sum of the states of Consciousness grouped
under Thought, Will, and Feeling. During deep sleep, ideation
ceases on the physical plane, and memory is in abeyance; thus for the
time-being “Mind is not,” because the organ,
through which the Ego manifests ideation and memory on the material
plane, has temporarily ceased to function. A noumenon can
become a phenomenon on any plane of existence only by manifesting on
that plane through an appropriate basis or vehicle; and during the long
night of rest called Pralaya, when all the existences are dissolved,
the
“UNIVERSAL MIND” remains as a permanent possibility
of mental action, or
as that abstract absolute thought, of which mind is the concrete
relative
manifestation. The AH-HI (Dhyan-Chohans) are the collective
hosts of
spiritual beings—the Angelic Hosts of Christianity, the
Elohim and “Messengers”
of the Jews—who are the vehicle for the manifestation of the
divine or universal
thought and will. They are the Intelligent Forces that give to and
enact
in Nature her “laws,” while themselves acting
according to laws imposed upon
them in a similar manner by still higher Powers; but they are not
“the personifications” of the powers of Nature, as
erroneously thought. This hierarchy of
spiritual Beings, through which the Universal Mind comes into action,
is
like an army—a “Host,” truly—by
means of which the fighting power of a nation
manifests itself, and which is composed of army corps, divisions,
brigades,
regiments, and so forth, each with its separate individuality or life,
and
its limited freedom of action and limited responsibilities; each
contained
in a larger individuality, to which its own interests are subservient,
and
each containing lesser individualities in itself.
QUESTIONER: These monstrous
wars cry for a durable peace. Every one is speaking already
of a Third World War. Do you see a possibility of averting
the new catastrophe?
KRISHNAMURTI: How can we
expect to avert it when the elements and values that cause war
continues? Has the war that is
just over produced a deep fundamental change in man?
Imperialism and
oppression are still rampant, perhaps cleverly veiled;
separate sovereign
states continue; nations are manoeuvring themselves into new
positions
of power; the powerful still oppress the weak; the
ruling elite
still exploit the ruled; social and class conflicts have not
ceased;
prejudice and hatred are burning everywhere. As long as
professional
priests with their organized prejudices justify intolerance and the
liquidation
of another being for the good of your country and the protection of
your
interests and ideologies, there will be war. As long as
sensory values
predominate over eternal value there will be war.
...
What you are the world is. If
you are nationalistic, patriotic, aggressive, ambitious, greedy, then
you are the cause of conflict and war. If you belong to any
particular ideology, to a specialized prejudice, even if you call it
religion, then you will be the cause of strife and misery. If
you are enmeshed in sensory values then there will be ignorance and
confusion. For what you are the world is; your
problem
is the world's problem.
Have you fundamentally changed because
of this present catastrophe? Do you not still call yourself
an American, an Englishman, an Indian, a German and so on?
Are you not still greedy for position and power, for possessions and
riches? Worship becomes hypocrisy when you are cultivating
the causes of war; your prayers lead you to illusion if you
allow yourself to indulge in hate and in worldliness. If you
do not eradicate in yourself the causes of enmity, of ambition, of
greed, then your gods are false gods who will lead you to
misery. Only goodwill and compassion can bring order and
peace to the world and not political blueprints and
conferences. You must pay the price for peace. You
must pay it voluntarily and happily and the price is the freedom from
lust and ill-will, worldliness and ignorance, prejudice and
hate. If there were such a fundamental change in you, you
could help to bring about a peaceful and sane world. To have
peace you must be compassionate and thoughtful.
...
You may not be able to avert the Third
World, War but you can free your heart and mind from violence and from
those causes that bring about enmity and prevent love. Then
in this dark world there will
be some who are pure of heart and mind, and from them perhaps the seed
of
a true culture might come into being. Make pure your heart
and mind, for by your life and action only can there be peace and
order. Do not be lost and confused in organizations but
remain wholly alone and simple. Do not seek merely to prevent
catastrophe but rather let each one deeply eradicate
those causes that breed antagonism and strife.
Theosophy is often referred to as a doctrine of hope and
responsibility.
It teaches that at the root of man's being spiritual powers far beyond
his
imagining lie dormant, and that "the soul of man is immortal, and its
future
is the future of a thing whose growth and splendour have no limit." It
rests
with each individual to awaken these powers into conscious activity.
What
greater thing could man ask from the Universe than this? What greater
hope?
He is told "the powers of nature lie before you: take what you can."
Theosophy teaches that man lives in a universe of law, and
that he will
get back from the universe the exact equivalent of what he puts in. In
other
words, there is no power outside himself which can add one inch to his
stature;
he himself has to grow as the result of his own efforts; no
God or
no Master, can do it for him. And conversely, what he has won from
nature
is his; there is no power in the universe can take it from
him; he
alone can gamble it away.
Here is hope and responsibility in fullest measure; often in
looking at
the world we grumble. "Would we not shatter it to bits and then remould
it
nearer to the heart's desire?"
But what man, worthy of the name of man, could wish for more
than this
to know that he alone is the maker of his destiny. Here are all the
powers
of the universe asleep at the heart of his being, and every effort made
to
awaken them will have its exact equivalent result, ounce for ounce.
All the pain, confusion, and frustration in the world is man's
creation.
Individually, racially, nationally; whatever it is, is our
creation,
our responsibility.
Theosophy is a philosophy which appeals to the strength and
courage in
men, it offers little for their personal comfort and
security. It comes
as a challenge to all that is finest and noblest in man, it is a
teaching
for pioneers, adventurers into the unknown.
Previous issues of Lucifer7 can be found at the online index of
Lucifer7
I want to thank all of you who support me, whether financially,
by asking questions, commenting or just be reading and enjoying what I
put online. To
those who wonder: no, I don't mind if people link to
my website(s). In fact: it's appreciated. For instance: my blog will
find new readers faster if people share it with
friends and link to it.
he who loves that Wisdom which one might truly speak of as Divine, because
it is heaven-born, ceases to attach importance to the kind of greatness
prized by the world at large.
Follow the way of constant self-inquiry and you will make even thinking serve
you as a means to freedom, and the very questions you put yourself will be
stepping-stones to the questionless state of the Overself.
Be ye lamps unto yourselves. Rely on yourselves, and do not rely on external
help. Hold fast to the Truth as a lamp. Seek salvation alone in the
Truth. Look not for assistance to anyone besides yourselves. There is no
savior in the world except the Truth. Trust in the Truth for Truth alone
abideth forever. There is no immortality except in Truth. Trust in the Truth.
I am the Truth.
Many Westerners imagine that Our Lord, the Tathagatha taught quietism and the giving up of all samsaric work. This is entirely wrong. By reading the two first verses in the Dhammapada, anyone can be convinced of the fallacy of this idea. The verses are:
"All that we are is the result of what we have thought:
it is founded on our thoughts, it is made up of our thoughts. If a
man speaks or acts with an evil thought, pain follows him, as the wheel follows
the foot of the ox that draws the carriage.
"All that we are is the result of what we have thought: it is founded on our thoughts, it is made up of our thoughts. If a man speaks or acts
with a pure thought, happiness follows him, like a shadow that never leaves
him."
A man's thoughts direct his words and actions; but they are themselves neither words nor actions. When a man speaks or acts, when he transfers his thoughts into speech or action, or into both, then the cause has brought the proper effect, and something is accomplished. Mere thinking does not do it. Speaking is incipient action, as silence is incipient inaction.
St. Paul cannot too often be defended against the reproach
cast upon him fifty years ago by Dr. Goldwin Smith, touching the argument
about the seed sown in the ground that it must die before the new life can
appear. The Church would rather let St. Paul suffer in literary reputation
as the author of I Corinthians than sacrifice their dogma. St. Paul
was too well versed in rhetoric to go before the clever scholars of Corinth
with a false metaphor and he did not do so. Goldwin Smith did not bring
his knowledge of Greek to bear upon the passage, but accepted the interpretation
of the Church that the corpse, already dead, was the seed sown in the earth
that would spring to life again. The Church has made a graveyard discourse
of this chapter, which St. Paul could not possibly have intended as verse
50 makes evident. As a graveyard exhortation to those who blindly believe
in the resurrection of the physical body, could a more bitter mockery be
conceived than the closing verses: "O grave where is thy victory, O
death where is thy sting?"
What a difference when the chapter is read as St. Paul
intended it to be: a paean of jubilant life and birth, of life more
abundantly, of birth and rebirth on the physical earth, of birth in the psychic
world, of birth in the noetic or spiritual world. All this is concealed
from the English-speaking reader by mistranslation of important words and
the apparent transposition of one or two verses. One Greek word in
particular appears to have gained the enmity of the theologians. It
is the word psuche, or psyche in English, the butterfly, applied by the Greeks
to the human soul, which flits and flutters from flower to flower of the
desires of life, so that a man changes from hour to hour, from day to day
and from year to year, so that he is never the same at one period of life
that he was at another. Jesus and Paul both use the word to represent
the human soul or personality, but the translators do their utmost to conceal
or camouflage this fact, because "saving the soul" is the great mission of
the evangelical preacher, though Jesus taught that he who would seek to save
his soul would lose it, the changeable personality having to be abandoned
so that the stable spiritual Self, the ever present Christ principle, available
to every man, may become the basic reality of his existence. The translators
make Jesus say that "he who would seek to save his life shall lose it," which
is nonsense. (See Luke ix. 24, and kindred passages for the substitution
of life for soul.) A similar deception as found in the writings of
St. Paul. Verse 44 of this 15 chapter of I Corinthians may be studied as
the basis of Goldwin Smith's charge of false metaphor. The Authorized
Version reads: "It is sown a natural body; it is raised a spiritual
body. There is a natural body, and there is a spiritual body."
The word "Natural" should be "psychic," and is so rendered in the margin
of the Revised Versions of 1881-1886. "Natural" conveys to people generally
the meaning of common or ordinary, so that the corpse is understood to be
meant as what is "sown" in the burial of a dead body. This is an entire
misconception of Paul's teaching. Burial in a grave of a dead body
was not in his mind at all. What he speaks of is the psychic body,
sown at birth in a physical body, to be raised in its reincarnation or resurrection,
the conditions mentioned duly applying to the psychic body which the experiences
of the disciple must change it into a more glorious spiritual body or if
he fails try again in another incarnation. These conditions obviously
do not apply to a body of flesh and blood as verse 50 makes plain.
It, that is, the psychic body, is sown in corruption: it is raised
in incorruption: it is sown in dishonor (how can this apply to the mortal
bodies of our beloved ones?): it is raised in glory: it is sown
in weakness: it is raised in power: it is sown a psychic body:
it is raised a spiritual body. There is a psychic body and there is
a spiritual body. It depends wholly on the disciple himself of what
kind of flesh his next body shall consist of if he reincarnates, whether
he shall have a terrestrial or a celestial body; whether he shall share
the glory of the sun or that of the moon or a star. If he is able to
transcend the psychic world he will become a quickening spirit, for the "second
man is the Lord from heaven."
It is clear enough from all this that Paul used no
false metaphor. The psychic seed, which is the personality must die,
as Jesus taught: "If any man will come after me, let him deny
himself and take up his cross daily and follow me. For whosoever will
save his soul (psuche, personality) will lose it; but whosoever will
lose his soul for my sake, the same shall save it." (Luke ix. 23, 24).
"I therefore, the prisoner of the Lord, beseech
you that ye walk worthy of the vocation wherewith ye are called. With
all lowliness and meekness, with long-suffering, forbearing one another in
love; endeavoring to keep the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace
. . . till we all come in the unity of the faith, and of the knowledge of
the Son of God; unto a perfect man, unto the measure of the stature
of the fullness of Christ." (Ephesians iv. 1, 2, 3, 13) .
Previous issues of
Lucifer7 can be found at the online index of
Lucifer7
I want to thank all of you who support me, whether financially,
by asking questions, commenting or just be reading and enjoying what I
put online. To
those who wonder: no, I don't mind if people link to
my website(s). In fact: it's appreciated. For instance: my blog will
find new readers faster if people share it with
friends and link to it.
Better be a nettle in the side of your friend than his
echo.
The condition which high friendship demands is, ability to do without
it. To be capable of that high office requires great and
sublime
parts. There must be very two, before there can be very one.
348: "Leave the past behind; leave the future
behind; leave
the present behind. Thou art then ready to do to the other
shore. Never more shalt thou return to a life that ends in
death."
Hurt a man by doing him bodily harm; you may think that his
pain and
suffering cannot spread by any means to his neighbors, least of all to
men of other nations. We affirm that it will, in good time. Therefore,
we say, that unless every man is brought to understand and accept as an
axiomatic truth that
by wronging one man we wrong not only ourselves but the whole of
humanity
in the long run, no brotherly feelings such as preached by all the
great
Reformers, pre-eminently by Buddha and Jesus, are possible on earth.
A Master wrote to Mr. A.P. Sinnett (page 341, Mahatma
Letters)
- "Once separated from the common influences of Society,
nothing
draws us to any outsider save his evolving spirituality. He
may
be a Bacon or an Aristotle in knowledge, and still not make his current
felt a feather's weight by us, if his power is confined to the Manas
(intellectual mind)
. . . . Manas, pure and simple, is of a lower degree, and of the earth
earthly: and so your greatest men count but as nonentities in
the
area where greatness is measured by the standard of spiritual
development."
We may add to this the testimony of Subba Row, in a letter
just
reprinted by The Point Loma Theosophical Forum, that he knew of "many
chelas, high
chelas too, very near initiation, who are ignorant of the art of
reading
and writing."
"You must be up and doing if you want to secure your
immortality,"
he adds, and "This is impressed in the mind of every Occult student by
his
Guru. Mere goody-goodness, and irreproachable life will not
help
us.
We must swim against the current and by dint of perseverance mount
higher.
If not, we will be left where we are to vegetate and rot in the scale
to
which we may have come. The Kingdom of Heaven ought to be
taken
by
force. Will, irresistible, indomitable will alone carry
upward an
Occult
student. If he has not got that, he has no chance
whatever.
Only
one who toils hard can ascend a mountain peak." (*)
Which is only another way of saying, "Many are called, but few
are
chosen," and "Strait is the gate and few there be that enter in
thereat."
Evangelical Christianity seeks to convince people that it is
all as
easy as getting entered on a voting list, but the difficulties have
never been minimized by the real Teachers.
(*) The first sentence as quoted here is slightly different from the
one as found in the T. Subba Row Collected Writings which says: "Your
observation that you must be up and doing if you want to secure your
immortality is
perfectly true". (TSR Col. Wr. Vol. I, p. 177 - Point Loma
Publications)
Because of the interest of this subject the editor of Lucifer7 thinks
it
pertinent to also quote T.Subba Row elaborating on the subject of
immortality
(idem p. 77):
Theosophists have never stated, so far as I know,
that
adepts alone attain immortality. The condition ultimately reached by
ordinary man after going through all the planetary rounds during
countless number of
ages in the gradual ascending order of material objective existence is
reached by the adept within a comparitively shorter time; but every
human being,
unless he is utterly 'wicked and depraved', may hope to reach that
state
sooner or later according to his merits and karma.
"We call `immortal' but the
one LIFE in its
universal collectivity and entire or Absolute Abstraction;
that
which has neither beginning nor end, nor any break in its continuity."
- M.L. 129.
But K.H. - the Mahatma just quoted - also points out that
there is
the possibility of achieving a qualified immortality and in other
letters where the word is used in reference to human immortality, it
carries this qualified meaning.
"Therefore the earliest
Chaldeans had several
prefixes to the word immortality, one of which is the Greek,
rarely-used term - pan-aeonic immortality, i.e. beginning with the
manvantara and ending with the pralaya of our Solar Universe.
It
lasts the aeon or the `period' of our Pan, or 'all nature'.
Immortal then is he in the pan-aeonic immortality, whose distinct
consciousness and perception of Self under whatever form - undergoes no
disjunction at any time. Not for one second during the period
of
his Egoship ....Suffice for you, for the present to know, that a
man, an Ego like yours or mine, may be immortal from one to the other
round. Let us say I begin my immortality at the present
fourth
round, i.e. having become a full adept (which unhappily I am not,) I
arrest the hands of Death at will, and am finally obliged to submit to
it, my knowledge of the secrets of nature put me in a position to
retain my consciousness and distinct perception of Self as an object to
my own reflective consciousness and cognition; and thus avoid
all
such dismemberments of principles, that as a rule take place after the
physical death of average humanity, I remain as Koot Hoomi in my Ego
throughout the whole series of births and lives across the seven worlds
and Arupa-lokas until finally I land again on this earth among the
fifth race men of the full fifth Round beings. I would have
been,
in such a case, 'immortal' for an inconceivable (to you) long period,
embracing many milliards of years. And yet am 'I' truly
immortal,
for all that? Unless I make the same, efforts as I now do, to
secure for myself another such furlough from Nature's law, Koot Hoomi
will vanish and may become a Mr.
Smith or an innocent Babu, when his leave expires." - M.L.
129
and
130.
And again on page 276. "When the Seeress" (Mrs. A.B.
Kingsford) is
made to reveal that 'Immortality is by no means a matter of course for
all'
that `souls shrink away and expire' . . . . she is delivering herself
of
actual incontrovertible facts".
The Spirit in man, the Atma, is Immortal, is one with the
Eternal
Life, the Absolute which has no beginning nor end, but the continuing
consciousness of the Ego, its `qualified immortality' must be achieved
and retained through the power of immortability - for which word we
thank Dr. McConnell.
Previous issues of
Lucifer7 can be found at the online index of
Lucifer7
I want to thank all of you who support me, whether financially,
by asking questions, commenting or just be reading and enjoying what I
put online. To
those who wonder: no, I don't mind if people link to
my website(s). In fact: it's appreciated. For instance: my blog will
find new readers faster if people share it with
friends and link to it.
Rituals have no efficacy, prayers are but vain words, incantations have no saving power. To abandon covetousness and lust, to become free from evil desires, to renounce hatred and ill will, this is true worship.
Refusal to discuss an issue or to debate an argument is one way of concealing the disagreeable questions in review from the people who ought to be informed.
If any subject occupies the public mind today it is education. But what
kind of education have we in view? To educate the mind is difficult enough,
but how much more troublesome the education of the emotions. Accuracy
of thinking is not, as is commonly supposed, a rarer thing than refinement
or delicacy of sensibility. In my belief it is much more widely distributed and more highly appreciated. Far more care is given by the state to the education of the intellect than of the feelings. The values of quick wits, a good memory, sharp intelligence, and exact thinking are universally recognized. But where are we to look for a similar recognition of the values of right feeling, of
taste, of delicate discernment, of quality rather than force of mind, of
sensitivity and sympathy in social intercourse, which are powers and faculties of the soul? By his taste we distinguish the scholar from the pedant, by his possession of taste, the gentleman from the barbarian. It is the standard of refinement prevailing among its citizens that exalts a nation, and by which
a civilization may be judged. Brains and knowledge you may have in abundance
and yet remain a savage. Examples are not far to seek in the world
today. Look around and you will, I think, become vividly aware that to educate
and discipline the soul is of no less vital consequence in any society than
to accumulate information or add a cubit to intellectual stature.
Previous issues of
Lucifer7 can be found at the online index of
Lucifer7
I want to thank all of you who support me, whether financially,
by asking questions, commenting or just be reading and enjoying what I
put online. To
those who wonder: no, I don't mind if people link to
my website(s). In fact: it's appreciated. For instance: my blog will
find new readers faster if people share it with
friends and link to it.
Real wisdom can arise only from a pure soil, and such wisdom will
constitute a new being without any taint or shadow from the old.
Olive Harcourt, Canadian Theosophist, Vol. 24, #12 - 1944
The most important opposites given by Pythagoras are as follows: -
1. Limited and Unlimited.
2. Odd and Even.
3. One and Many.
4. Right and Left.
5. Masculine and Feminine.
6. Rest and Motion.
7. Straight and Crooked.
8. Light and Darkness.
9. Square and Oblong.
10. Good and Evil.
Bacon
'They are ill discoverers that think there is no land when they can see nothing but sea'.
Remember and repeat often the golden words of the Initiate from Tarsos: "Now abideth Faith, Hope and Charity, these three; but the greatest of them is Charity." Faith is needed in all kinds of actions. Men have called it Confidence. That is one of the meanings of the Greek word PISTIS. Without hope there is little use of keeping up any kind of work. You must hope for better understanding, more knowledge. The Greek word ELPIS means Expectation. "Charity" is a misnomer. The Greek word AGAPE stands for voluntary, friendly Helpfulness, not for hypocritic slumming. It stands for Love - a word nowadays mostly used as a synonym for procreative activity. This belongs to involvement in matter and hence to Samsara, the body, and not the Soul. True Love is nirvanic Bliss, the Ananda of the Hindus.
Sometimes it is imagined that the saying "Charity begins at home" is an expression of selfishness and therefore evil. Charity, or rather Love, must begin at home, or else, how can it widen its circle of helpfulness and joy? But it must not be limited to the home. The only so called love that is wrong
and must be limited is self-love. Let nothing make you hesitate doing good
to any one that you can reach. But do not take from some one else what is
his and give it to some one that you want to help.
Madame Alexandra David Neel, From The Maha-Bodhi, May-June, 1946.
Siddharta Gautama, the Buddha, has not escaped the
universal fate of all philosophers, expounders of a doctrine and founders
of religions. Like all of them, he has been betrayed.
During his life time some of his Disciples had already
attempted to "improve" in their own way - that is to say to distort - his
teaching and his discipline. Buddhist Scriptures mention Devadatta
as heading an attempt of that kind; he was certainly not the only one.
What did he and his likes want? They wanted more
binding rules, they wanted more peremptory commands regarding what they had
to believe and what they had not to believe; they revolted against
freedom.
And when the Teacher was gone and centuries had elapsed
dimming the memory of what he really had been, small-minded devotees, puerile,
emotional bhaktas, metaphysicians, philosophers, small or lofty, all took
part in the great betrayal of that which had been a clear, simple and bright
doctrine of liberation through Knowledge.
Pseudo-dogmas appeared though the Master had rejected
opinions and expressly declared:
"If you are asked, O disciples, `what opinion does
your Master hold ?', answer, `Our Master holds no opinion; he has freed
himself of all opinions.' "
Ritualistic performances, worship of images and of
relics appeared, though the Master had condemned them and declared that the
belief in the efficacy of religious ceremonies and in all kind of cults prevented
salvation.
Has not the "I", the jiva, the permanent self traveling
through series of reincarnations, found a place in the beliefs of the large
majority of self-styled Buddhists though the Buddha has taught the instantaneousness,
the essential momentariness of all formations, of all Dharmas, the effect
being produced by the destruction of the cause.
Do not the stories of the Jatakas play, amongst the
common lot of Buddhists, the same part as the "Golden Legend" the lives of
the saints, play amongst the alike common lot of the Roman -Catholic countries?
We must agree that the Buddha has not preached for
the simpletons. Those may lead virtuous, happy lives under other Masters:
Teachers for children's schools.
The Buddha has preached for the few capable of understanding
him; for the few lotuses which lift their heads above the water of
the pond, according to the similitude in the Mahavagga.
There are such ones; why do they not come forward
to re-preach the Dhamma for the conquest of evil and suffering through Right
views.
Reliance on men who stand forth as leaders of their
fellow creatures; reliance on gods never freed anybody, nor mankind
as a whole of the manifold ills to which they are a prey. Most of those
are self inflicted and none but ourselves are capable of eradicating them.
Be your own light. Be your own refuge.
Such is the advice the Buddha has given us.
Tibetans have chosen a very good term as synonym of
enlightenment, it is lhag thong, that is to say, "to see more." It
is exactly what is needed, to see more than the many who remain satisfied
with a superficial look at things.
It is more needed than ever in the present political,
economic and moral chaos into which men are staggering. It is needed
to see more in order to detect the foolishness of attempting to build a new
world with the rotten materials of the old one.
Buddhism is decidedly neither a religion, not a set
system of undemonstrable theories. It is an attitude of mind.
The attitude of one who challenges the man made evils of the world and knows
that through Right views, Right knowledge, and only through them, these evils
can be overcome.
Men who have made theirs that "attitude of mind" are
wanted to promulgate again the much forgotten, genuine Dhamma of the wisest
of all Masters.
Previous issues of
Lucifer7 can be found at the online index of
Lucifer7
I want to thank all of you who support me, whether financially,
by asking questions, commenting or just be reading and enjoying what I
put online. To
those who wonder: no, I don't mind if people link to
my website(s). In fact: it's appreciated. For instance: my blog will
find new readers faster if people aren't afraid to share it with
friends and link to it.
One learns to be wise only as he acts with awareness and integrity, not
mechanically; action without wisdom is folly, and wisdom without action
is only a lame and stilted substitute.
Miguel De Cervantes
Delay always breeds danger; and to protract a great design is often to
ruin it.
Paul Brunton, The Inner Reality, Chapter V
Real love exists when there is true inward identification with the life
of
another entity.
Tirukkural 28:279
The arrow is straight but cruel; the lute is crooked but sweet.
Therefore, judge men by their acts, not their appearance.
C. G. Jung, CW 7: 409
Anyone who wants to know the human psyche will
learn next to nothing from experimental psychology. He would be better
advised to put away his scholar's gown, bid farewell to his study, and
wander with human heart through the world. There in the horrors of
prisons, lunatic asylums and hospitals, in drab suburban pubs, in
brothels and gambling halls, in the salons of the elegant, the stock
exchanges, Socialist meetings, churches, revivalist gatherings, and
ecstatic sects, through love and hate, through the experience of
passion in every form in his own body, he would reap richer stores in
knowledge than textbooks a foot thick could give him, and he will
know how to doctor the sick with real knowledge of the human soul."
The world needs me, otherwise I would not be
here. I am a part of the whole and each part is necessary to the
welfare of the whole. I wilt live, think, and work in the
conviction that I am not only wanted, but needed. That great
truth shall be my constant inspiration.
The welfare of the whole grows greater and greater,
the better each part plays its part. Therefore I must be nothing
less than all that I possibly can be. I am here for a great
purpose; Life is too important to send me here for any other
purpose; and whatever may come or go, to that purpose I shall
ever be true.
Life to me means the being of my best and the doing
of my best, that all the world may be better. I shall not live
for things, but for that greater life that reigns in the spirit of all
things; nor
shall the coming or going of things cause me to depart from the lofty
position
that I have taken.
To me, there can be no defeat, no failure, no
loss. He is never defeated who wins the life he has elected to
live. He knows no failure who gains the richer life from every
experience, circumstance or
event that may come to pass. He knows no loss who ascends to the
greater
whenever the lesser seems to pass away, and this, I propose to
do. This
I must do to be true to the life I am here to live.
My first thought shall be to love much; my
second, to do much, but I shall do nothing that will not add to the
happiness and welfare of someone.
My aim shall be to reach the heights, not that I
alone may enjoy the splendor of the heights, but that others may find
the way.
My face shall ever be turned to the light of the
great Eternal Sun; and to become a living revelation of that
light, shall be the dearest wish of my heart.
RULE ONE: If you would know the Self, you must
know that the self which is everything to itself is nothing in
itself;
it is both the creator and the victim of illusion; but do not
treat
it as such until you know it as such.
RULE TWO: Live to the highest and fullest you
know in the life of the self you know; only when you know
yourself are you ready to forget yourself; only when you forget
yourself are you ready to know your Self.
RULE THREE: Discriminate between the self that
lives in the consciousness of its separateness from all other selves,
and
the Self which knows itself as essentially one with all other Selves
and
with the ALL-SELF. The second cannot be born until the first
dies;
the first cannot die until it has given birth to the second.
RULE FOUR: Ponder on the mystery of The
Three Selves. The first is the Shadow; the second is the
Substance of
the Shadow; the third is the Sun that casts the Shadow of the
Substance.
RULE FIVE: Do not love the light of day for it is
darkness; do not fear the darkness of night, for it is there the
Starry Triangle burns, making the darkness light and the light darkness.
RULE SIX: Look not to yourself but within
yourself for the courage which will suffice to face that fearful
knowledge of yourself in all the fullness alike of its failures and its
spiritual possibilities, which shatters, and, in shattering, liberates
you to take the first step into
the Kingdom of Self-Knowledge.
RULE SEVEN: Avoid the two pitfalls on the
Path. One is self-pride; the other is self-contempt.
RULE EIGHT: Prepare yourself for the opening
of the Secret Eye; it will show you how within the self of the
present moment lies hidden the Self you are going to be, as the oak
within the acorn.
RULE NINE: Never fear or shun
experience; take all that Destiny brings, joyous and tragic
alike, as food for that Self which is growing up within you throughout
the ages in the image of that Self which you are in the Mind of God
from everlasting to everlasting.
RULE TEN: Have faith in Love, even in the
Desert and on the Cross. When you thus accept loneliness you will
know that you are one of a shining company innumerable; when thus
you accept suffering
you will know the secret of Spiritual Joy.
RULE ELEVEN: Hold fast to the hand of
Love. His face is unknown to you, but He is no stranger; He
leads you by perilous
paths and ways of warfare, but He is no enemy, and the name of His
abiding-place
is Peace.
RULE TWELVE: Never resist Love when He would
work His will with you through the darkness. He lives in you to
bring you into the Light; He is Himself the Light, and, in so far
as you live in Him, you too are the Light. Previous issues of
Lucifer7 can be found at the online index of
Lucifer7
I want to thank all of you who support me, whether financially,
by asking questions, commenting or just be reading and enjoying what I
put online. To
those who wonder: no, I don't mind if people link to
my website(s). In fact: it's appreciated. For instance: my blog will
find new readers faster if people aren't afraid to share it with
friends and link to it.
"We are all afraid. Our lower nature, which persists in every
one of us (or we should be invisible to mortal eyes and functioning on
vastly higher planes of being) dreads its own destruction and deceives
us - even the best of us - with arguments of ever-increasing subtility,
of which a favorite one is that we should be at the mercy of the lower
nature of others unless ready at all times to use dishonest methods for
our own defense. But the truth is that the only absolute protection
against treachery is honesty. The
slightest compromise with dishonesty provides an opening through which
the
darkest forces surge and gain control of us. It is not the other man's
dishonesty,
but our own that endangers us as individuals. In other words, if we
admit
one trace of insincerity into our reasoning the effect is similar to
that
of poison introduced into a well; it does not poison one part of the
water,
but all of it; and the more colorless and unnoticeable it is, the more
deadly
the results."
Buddha, Dhammapada, Translation Juan Mascaro
63 If a fool can see his own folly, he in this at least is
wise; but the fool who thinks he is wise, he indeed is the real fool.
(..)According to our theosophical tenets, every man or woman
is endowed, more or less, with a magnetic potentiality, which when
helped by a sincere, and especially by an intense and indomitable
will--is the most effective
of magic levers placed by Nature in human hands--for woe as for weal.
Let
us then, Theosophists, use that will to send a sincere greeting and a
wish
of good luck for the New Year to every living creature under the
sun--enemies and relentless traducers included. Let us try and feel
especially kindly
and forgiving to our foes and persecutors, honest or dishonest, lest
some
of us should send unconsciously an "evil eye" greeting instead of a
blessing.(...)
Paul Brunton, The Spiritual Crisis of Man, Chapter XII
What does spiritual progress mean? Does it mean to have more and more
visions, raptures or strange happenings? No! It means that every year a
man
shall feel more control of himself, more improvement in his character,
more
watchful of and obedient to his intuitions, more devoted to his higher
self.
Editorial
The holiday season is upon us. I will for instance be celebrating
'Sinterklaas' on Friday December 5th as is the Dutch custom. We will be
sharing gifts (anonymously) enhanced with poems for the occasion. I
expect at least one gift will be hidden somewhere in the house with the
poem giving some hints on where that gift might be. Last year I had to
follow a series of such clues: each gift found contained merely a poem
describing where next to look. This was all properly symbolical as the
gift was a dvd-set containing information on the Tibetan Bardo's - or
the stages of consciousness after death (or between lives).
The late James Morgan Pryse, when he was a child of five or six, had
been taught Greek by his father and in repeating the Lord's Prayer to
himself he
discovered that the Greek version was a mantram, a magical invocation
which
had the effect of raising his consciousness to a higher
level. Mr.
Pryse translated the prayer as follows:
Our Father who art in the Over-world, thy Name be
intoned, thy Realm return, thy WILL arise.
As in the Firmament, so on the Earth.
That Bread of the coming day give us today: and free us from
our obligations, as we also have freed those under obligation to
us; and bring us not to the test, but deliver us from
uselessness.
For thine is the Realm, the Force and the Radiance, throughout the
Life-cycles. Amen.
This incantation involves esoteric
knowledge, and those who seek it seriously will find it.
Those who are satisfied with exoteric statements will get nowhere.
Mr. Pryse explains that the Greek
epiousion, is a coined word found nowhere except in this
prayer; it clearly does not mean "daily",
but evidently "which is coming" or "of the future." The Bread
is the
"Bread of Life", of which the Christos says: "I am that
Living Bread
that came down out of the Firmament. If anyone eats of this
Bread he
shall live throughout the Life-cycle (aion) " (John vi. 51) . Previous issues of
Lucifer7 can be found at the online index of
Lucifer7
I want to thank all of you who support me, whether financially,
by asking questions, commenting or just be reading and enjoying what I
put online. To
those who wonder: no, I don't mind if people link to
my website(s). In fact: it's appreciated. For instance: my blog will
find new readers faster if people aren't afraid to share it with
friends and link to it.
Incarnations of the Deity, H.P. Blavatsky, Isis Unveiled, ii. 535.
No orthodox Brahmans and Buddhists would deny the Christian
incarnation; only, they understand it in their own philosophical way,
and how could they deny it? The very cornerstone of their religious
system is periodical incarnations of the Deity. Whenever humanity is
about merging into materialism and moral degradation, a Supreme Spirit
incarnates himself in his creatures selected for the purpose. The
"Messenger of the Highest" links with the duality of matter and soul,
and the triad being thus completed by the union of its Crown, a saviour
is born, who helps restore humanity to the path of truth and
virtue. The early Christian Church, all imbued with Asiatic
philosophy, evidently shared the same belief - otherwise it would have
neither erected into an
article of faith the second advent, nor cunningly invented the fable of
Anti-Christ as a precaution against possible future incarnations.
Neither could they have imagined that Melchisedek was an avatar of
Christ. They
had only to turn to the Bhagavad Gita to find Krishna saying to
Arjuna: "He who follows me is saved by wisdom and even by works .
. . As often as virtue declines in the world, I make myself manifest to
save it."
Niels Bohr
The opposite of a correct statement is a false statement. But the
opposite of a profound truth may well be another profound truth.
Three things are necessary in the laying of a foundation for the
spiritual life. Aspiration, a real impersonal interest in
something outside
oneself, the motive; Concentration, which is the means to power,
and
Sincerity, that inner sense of truth with oneself; a growing
capacity
at every step of the way to detect and face self-deception in its more
and
more subtle forms. This is the only safeguard on a difficult, and
dangerous road. Each of these requirements is equally essential,
and
to neglect any one spells futility if nothing worse.
The following are some notes of a discussion on the first of these
qualities.
Every individual who has a real interest in the welfare of Humanity
has something in common with every other person who is working for the
Race. This common interest in Humanity is the true basis, and
provides real values in the approach to spiritual matters.
Two things are required, however, before an individual can take a
step toward the true Path. He must realize as the result of his
own examination and reflection that the life he knows is totally
unsatisfactory as an ends in itself. And, he must have the
conviction that Light exists; that it may be attained, and that
when found it will justify itself.
Whatever true impersonal interest we possess is the germ of
spirituality within us. This is the one sound spot ins our
being; the one
link with the unawakened powers of our spiritual nature. We have
to
discover it, clarify and define it, and free it from sentimentality and
self-deceiving illusions as far as we are able.
The starting point then is to look deep within ourselves, and
discover what this impersonal interest is, which we value more than
anything else
in all life. We shall pass in review many fine and great
qualities,
some of which are so great that we and everybody else assent that there
can
be none greater, but we have to discover not what others may consider
important, but what value makes the greatest appeal to us, and draws
out our energy
as nothing else can.
It will help to clarify this search if we ask ourselves this
question; "If to-morrow I had to give my life in exchange for one
of these qualities, which should I choose?" If we ask ourselves,
"What quality in human life will I be fully satisfied to have lived and
worked for when I come
to the end of my life?" In this way we shall discover what in the
deepest part of our nature we value the highest, the form which our
link
(however small) with the `Great Life of the Universe' takes the form of
impersonal living to which we have given allegiance in the
past.
It will be seen that it becomes a matter of tremendous importance that
we
acquire a growing capacity to discriminate between self-interest, no
matter
how beautifully disguised, and true impersonality.
As a result of increasing awareness and clarity regarding our
values,
we shall seek for evidences of them in ourselves, in those about us, in
literature, and history, and we shall discover as our perceptions
become more acute
that very much that passes for fineness and greatness in human life is
but
a tawdry imitation; it is not the power to give without asking,
it
is not the power of Self-Mastery, it is not the disinterested love of
Truth,
it is not compassion which we shall usually find, but subtly disguised
barter
masquerading as these things. We shall realize that Beauty,
Truth,
and true Greatness, even in a small way, are very rare indeed, and when
we do discover them, as we certainly shall, if we look for them, our
whole
being will go out to them and feed on them, and the germ of
spirituality
awake in us will expand in their radiance. "Grow as the flower
grows,
unconsciously but eagerly anxious to open its soul to the air. So
must you press forward to open your Soul to the Eternal."
All this is the first step, a negative one. The neophyte has
discovered what those one or two things are which he values more than
anything else
in life, which he would gladly give his life for if he had the
power.
He has cleared away vagueness and obscurity, sentimentality and
self-deception, so that his value stands out clear and well-defined in
his mind, so that
he could formulate it at any time, at a moment's notice.
The next step is to put oneself in training in order to get the
power
to dedicate whatever of his life he has made his own, to his chosen
value. This preparatory work of self-discipline is to give him
the power to take a positive and much more difficult step, to commit
himself unreservedly,
unconditionally and with all the force at his command, to his
values.
This must be done coolly and without dependence upon emotional
enthusiasm,
knowing as well as it is possible for him to know what it means and
will
mean to him. If he succeeds in doing this, he has thrown the
challenge
to his lower nature and the first battle in the long war for Self
Conquest
is on.
The Search
Ianthe H. Hoskins
There is no path for me, no God, no guide;
I fling away from light and leading hand;
I have no sword, no staff, no friend beside:
Alone, unarmed, I seek an unknown land.
With
bruised fingers and with bleeding feet,
Alone I tread, while round me and before
Foe upon foe assails me, whom I greet
As friends to lead me to the unknown shore.
Give me no counsel, proffer me no aid,
No star in my impenetrate night;
Alone, alone my journey has to be made
Through the here-darkness to the yonder Light.
So shall the pilgrim known from whence he came,
The spark be one with the eternal flame. Previous issues of
Lucifer7 can be found at the online index of
Lucifer7
I want to thank all of you who support me, whether financially,
by asking questions, commenting or just be reading and enjoying what I put online. To
those who wonder: no, I don't mind if people link to
my website(s). In fact: it's appreciated. For instance: my blog will
find new readers faster if people aren't afraid to share it with
friends and link to it.
New online
Short Quotes
Editorial: election matters & poll results
Karma From a Buddhist
Standpoint
The Ministry of Christ, Henry Drummond
Bridge Out New on Katinka Hesselink
Net
... the
only 'Essentials' in the Religion of Humanity are - virtue, morality,
brotherly love, and kind sympathy with every living creature, whether
human or animal... 'In these Fundamentals - unity; in non-essentials -
full liberty; in all things - charity,' we say to all collectively and
to every one individually - keep to your forefather's religion,
whatever it may be - if you feel
attached to it, Brother; think with your own brains if you have any; be
by all means yourself whatever you are, unless you are really a bad
man.
And remember above all, that a wolf in his own skin is immeasurably
more
honest that the same animal - under a sheep's clothing.
The way to
the truth to be found within oneself is by shedding all that one has
accumulated and with which one has become identified, thus reducing
himself to a condition where one is as a point of no dimension. Thus
unencumbered, one becomes simple in heart and mind, a condition of
simplicity as well
as freedom in which one's whole disposition and capacity are at the
service
of that truth.
Paul Brunton, The Secret Path, Chapter IV
Life teaches us silently while men utter their instruction in loud
voices.
Arthur C. Clarke's First Law
"When a distinguished but elderly
scientist states that something is possible, he is almost certainly
right. When he states that something is impossible, he is very probably
wrong."
Marie
Edith Beynon
We have only this moment, sparkling like a star in our hand...
and
melting like a snowflake. Let us use it before it's too late.
Editorial: election matters & poll results
The
past week has been something of a rollercoaster in theosophical
circles.
First we hear that there is a proposal before the general council (sort
of the theosophical senate) to take away the voting rights of the
members and have the president elected by the general council. I
started a poll which shows that out of 52 people to vote a large
majority 88.5% agree that the members should decide who the next
president should be.
The other issues I put up for voting were:
Should
the general council only meet when more than half its members are
present? A majority thought that was a reasonable rule change: 87% out
of 46 votes.
A slight majority of 51% out of 47 felt that the term
of presidency should be 5 years. Another 19.1% felt the term should be
even shorter: 4 years. A respectable minority felt the term should stay
7 years: 29.8%.
66% out of 74 felt there should be a limit to
the amount of years a president can serve. Around 14 years seems
reasonable to them. Only 21.3% felt the president should stay on as
long as they are reelected.
Who should the election committee
for the presidential elections report to? A large majority of 78% felt
the committee should report to the general council instead of (as at
present) the executive council.
Not very surprisingly most of
my online voters (96.5%) felt that e-mail should become one of the
official means of communication.
A large majority (95.6%) of
the people felt that at the next election there should be more
information available about the candidates. However it has been noted
that previous new candidates did a lot of world wide touring before
running for president. That is of course also a decent way for the
membership to get to know the candidates. I think the point is: we want
to get to know the person we vote for.
Should the secretary of the
executive committee be elected by the general council or just be
approved by them? The majority (90.7%) felt that the general council
should decide.
Now for my more controversial questions. Some
people felt this speculation would not do anybody any good. I asked who
people would vote for if they could vote again. Did the proposal,
authored by John Algeo, change their minds about who should have become
president? In the original election the Western vote (which is probably
represented in this poll) went to John Algeo. John is still the
preferred candidate of 57.1% of the people who took this poll. However
a large minority now feel Radha Burnier was the right person for the
job (42.9%).
I also asked what people feel about the candidate
Radha Burnier would have wanted to run: P. Krishna. The western voters
say that in a choice between Krishna and Algeo, they would pick the
latter: 66.7%. This question was least popular: only 39 people gave
their opinion on it.
News this morning, as I prepare this
newsletter, is that the proposal is not even going to be on the agenda
of the general council meeting. I have no words for that news. I will
keep the
poll
up for a bit longer, until it is confirmed by at least two other
members of the general council that the proposal is indeed not going to
be discussed.
There
are many kinds of Karma according to the Buddhist scriptures.
That which bears fruit in the present existence.
That
which bears fruit in rebirth.
That which bears
fruit at no fixed time.
By-gone karma, weighty,
abundant, close-at-hand, productive, supportive, counteractive and
destructive.
Karma may be likened to a seed which
produces fruit of its own kind, as for instance the acorn which can
only produce an oak tree; so each kind of Karma bears fruit of its own
kind, good or bad, immediate or delayed, weak or powerful.
I do not think it is possible to understand the Buddhist idea
of Karma from the exoteric scriptures alone. It would appear
from those available to us in the West, that there is no ego after
death. Therefore what is it that reincarnates, and of what
avail is Karma? It is often stated that only Karma remains,
but if there were no relatively permanent reincarnating unit, how did
Buddha achieve Buddhahood as the result of innumerable lives of effort,
or be able to look back upon his past lives? A continuing
entity is a logical necessity.
In the writer's
opinion, the Buddhist scriptures are not to be taken too
literally. Like all sacred scriptures, they were written for
the profane, while the inner teaching was reserved for the elect, those
who were capable of understanding the deeper meaning behind the facade
of apparent contradiction. One must remember, too, that
innumerable commentaries have been written in interpretation of
Buddha's teaching, and not all by wise men.
We
must, therefore, in interpreting the Buddhist scriptures, put them
before
the bar of reason, and avoid the mistake common to so many adherents of
Buddhism,
of becoming confused about the theory of non-ego. The fact
that Buddha
is said to have maintained silence on both questions, ego or non-ego,
obviously
implies that the ego was not denied.
Karma is one
of the basic teachings of Buddhism, and must logically rest upon the
necessity of a reincarnating unit. A great deal of Buddhist
thought deals with the law of cause and effect, and why there should
have arisen confusion of thought about the permanence of the Self or
Ego, it is difficult to understand, except as a result of corrupt
teaching.
The higher ego is called, by the Hindus,
the thread-soul, the sutratma. It is this which reincarnates
and inherits its own karma, and only the lower personality which
perishes at death, as each of its lower principles
disintegrate. It is upon the thread-soul that rests the karmc
responsibility of all its lower lives, and even though it dwells upon
its own higher plane and only sends down a Ray to dwell in denser
layers of matter, it yet assimilates the
experience of all these lower lives.
Theosophy
explains a great deal that is obscure in the Buddhist scriptures and
particularly so in regard to Karma and the nature of the
Self. While
the lower self has no permanency, changing from life to life, the real
Self
never dies, because it has always been; it has no beginning
and no
end. For vast, and to us incalculable periods of time, the
reincarnating units exist as separate entities, to be ultimately
absorbed into the parent source. (This is a great cosmic
mystery which can only be fully understood when we reach the threshold
of Nirvana).
With a continuing spiritual entity
carrying responsibility from life to life, one can understand the
theory of Karma, the reason for existence, the struggle between good
and evil, the striving to reach the goal of perfect knowledge, the
successes and failures of evolution.
To return to
the Buddhist scriptures. Some of them enumerate twelve kinds
of Karma which I append for the reader's reflection.
KARMA
WHICH BEARS FRUIT IN THE PRESENT INCARNATION. This results
from actions in the present life. (If we burn our fingers, we
have not
to wait until another life before we feel the pain).
Accidents in this
life may be the result of present carelessness irrespective of the
past.
We can set fresh causes in motion at any moment. On the other
hand
it may be the result of our immediate past life or of one much
earlier.
It is said that the Karma of humanity is so heavy from Atlantean times
that
a great deal of it is held back by the Elder Brothers of the race until
there
is strength to bear it. Those who have entered the Path find
their
lives full of trouble and pain, because before they can become perfect,
they
must exhaust their bad Karma. Therefore, Karma that would in
the ordinary
way be spread over a number of lives is concentrated into
one. No one
is immune from this law. One can realize the accumulation of
weighty
Karma that is being liquidated by greatly suffering egos during this
war,
and indeed during the period preceding it. Unfortunately a
fresh set
of weighty Karma is being engendered by those who are the instruments
of
Karma. "Needs must that evil comes, but woe unto him by whom
it cometh."
Bad karma generating bad karma is a vicious circle which can only be
broken
by knowledge and forgiveness.
KARMA WHICH BEARS
FRUIT IN REBIRTH. This is the Karma which we are making at
every moment of our present lives and which may have to wait for
circumstances of future births before it can be worked out.
KARMA
WHICH BEARS FRUIT AT NO FIXED TIME. This is often called
fluidic karma, i.e., our thoughts and actions may bring upon us karma
that would not
otherwise have fallen upon us. (It bears fruit whenever it
can find
an opportunity). We can modify past karma by our reactions to
life.
We can neutralize it by setting other forces in motion.
By-gone
Karma is dealt with above.
WEIGHTY KARMA WHETHER
GOOD OR BAD such as cruelty, murder, suicide, or lofty deeds, bears
fruit before lighter karma. H.P.B. stated in the Secret
Doctrine that Patriotism and great actions in national service are not
altogether good from the point of view of the highest. To
benefit a portion of humanity is good, but to do so at the expense of
others is bad. Therefore, in patriotism, the venom is present
with the good. In this war, therefore, however patriotic the
instincts of the fighting men may be, they are inevitably creating bad
karma by the violent deeds they have to perform.
War brings out all the worst in human nature, and few are pure and
passionless
enough to act without attachment to their deeds.
ABUNDANT
KARMA bears fruit before that which is not abundant. This
presumably means that continuous acts will produce abundant karma,
isolated acts "not abundant".
CLOSE AT
HAND. Karma remembered at point of death. The karma
which a man remembers at death springs up with him in rebirth.
HABITUAL KARMA. That which has become habitual
through much repetition. This will produce endless rebirths.
PRODUCTIVE OR SUPPORTIVE KARMA either good or bad. Supportive
karma is not supposed to produce fruit, but when rebirth is the result
of other karma, it supports the ensuing happiness or misery.
COUNTERACTIVE
KARMA. Often counteracts fruit of other karma, suppresses it or does
not suffer it to continue.
DESTRUCTIVE KARMA.
Destroys weak karma, preventing it from bearing fruit and makes room
for its own fruition.
The insight into Karma and
the fruit of karma possessed by the Buddhas was not shared by their
disciples.
There is individual karma, sex karma, or
race karma. Egos are magnetically attracted to those races
and countries where their special characteristics can find an outlet.
With regard to sex karma, egos are born into both sexes
according to the needs of their karma. Some students say
three lives in a man and three in a woman, but I question a fixed
number of lives in each sex, everything depending upon individual
karmic obligations. It is certain that the wrongs inflicted
by one sex upon the other will be expiated. Experience in
both sexes is necessary for complete evolution.
There
are also distinct differences between physical, emotional, mental and
spiritual karma. Each works out in its own plane.
It is possible to suffer physical pain as a result of past physical
karma, yet to inherit good emotional and mental karma, so that despite
physical handicaps, a good deal of happiness is enjoyed. The emotional
and mental states of past lives govern our emotional and mental
opportunities in this one, and our reactions to these opportunities
will govern our future lives. There is a never ceasing play
of cause and effect.
The only karma that frees
the ego from rebirth is PASSIONLESS KARMA, deeds without
attachment. The ideal conduct is to be "In sorrow not
dejected, in joy not overjoyed, dwelling outside the stress of passion,
fear and anger." To be without attachment breaks the round of
births and deaths. Therefore, it is enjoined upon us to act
without thought of merit. Good karma is
as binding as bad, and a good man far removed from a Wise one.
The two potent causes of rebirth are Love and Hate.
We are drawn life after life into incarnation with those we have either
loved or hated. It may be that the hatred is only on one
side. Personal love has to be transmuted into universal
compassion, for it is as binding as hate and will create
rebirth. The great battle ground for the spirit is Mother
Earth. Spirit is deeply encased in matter while on earth and
has to free itself by knowledge and lack of attachment.
The
Buddhist ideal of conduct is lofty indeed, and has shone like a jewel
throughout the centuries. It is difficult to achieve a
passionless state,
yet it is the only way to freedom from rebirth and suffering.
To begin
even in a small way to destroy the fruits of action, is to achieve a
peace
that is not easily shaken. It is a test that everyone can
apply to
himself.
It is certain that in every present
moment lies the Karma of the distant future, as well as the karma of
the past. H.P.B. stated that every one
of our egos has the karma of past Manvantaras behind.
The Ministry of
Christ
Henry Drummond
Christ sets His followers no tasks. He appoints no hours. He
allots no
sphere. He Himself simply went about and did good. He did not stop life
to do some special thing which should be called religious. His life was
His religion. Each day as it came brought round in the ordinary course
its natural ministry. Each village along the highway had someone
waiting to be helped. His pulpit was the hillside, His congregation a
woman at a well. The poor, wherever He met them, were His clients; the
sick, as often as He found them, His opportunity. His work was
everywhere; His workshop was the world.
Bridge Out
A priest and a pastor from the local churches are standing by
the road, pounding a sign into the ground, that read:
The End is Near!
Turn Yourself Around Now
Before it's Too Late!
As a car sped past them, the driver yelled, "Leave us alone,
you religious nuts!"
From the curve they heard screeching tires and a big splash.
The priest turns to the pastor and asks, "Do you think the sign should
just say, 'Bridge Out'?"
Previous issues of
Lucifer7 can be found at the online index of
Lucifer7
I want to thank all of you who support me, whether financially,
by commenting or just be reading and enjoying what I put online. To
those who wonder: no, I don't mind if people link to
my website(s). In fact: it's appreciated. For instance: my blog will
find new readers faster if people aren't afraid to share it with
friends and link to it.
New online
Short Quotes
Editorial
Mediumship a Physiological Phenomenon, H.P. Blavatsky
Dana Paramita - The Perfection Beyond Giving, Muriel Daw
To Know Theosophy Inner Strength Correspondence on Love
"This little life we lead on earth is but a school for
courage. If we learn
more courage when the game is losing, or is lost, should we then envy
the
apparent winner?"
The Sikh Japji
"Men do not become saints and sinner by merely calling
themselves so.
The recording angels take with them a record of man's acts.
It is he himself soweth, and he himself eateth."
Buddha, Dhammapada, Translation Juan Mascaro
334 If a man watches not for NIRVANA, his cravings grow like a creeper
and he jumps from death to death like a monkey in the forest from one
tree without fruit to another.
Children should above all be taught self-reliance, love for all men,
altruism, mutual charity, and, more than anything else, to think and
reason for themselves. We would reduce the purely mechanical
work of the memory to an absolute
minimum, and devote the time to the development and training of the
inner
senses, faculties and latent capacities . . . . We should aim at
creating
free men and women, free intellectually, free morally, unprejudiced in
all
respects, and, above all things, unselfish.
Mediumism is by no means an indication of a man's holiness. It is
merely
a physiological phenomenon. Usually, the better the medium, the more
delicate
he is; yet it is not disease that comes as a result of mediumism, but
the
latter as a result of bodily weakness, of shattered nerves. The walls
of
the prison being down, the soul will find it easier to tear itself away
and
go forth into free space. A man may be a blackguard, like H---, and be
the
greatest of mediums, but in this case his soul will be obsessed by
other
souls, more or less sinful, in accord with the quality of his own; as
is
the pastor, so is the parish. But there are thousands of shades of
mediumism,
and they cannot all be enumerated in a letter. All the ancient
philosophers
knew this, and shunned mediumism to such an extent that it was strictly
forbidden
to admit mediums to the Eleusinian and other Mysteries: those who had a
"familiar
spirit." Socrates was higher and purer than Plato; yet the latter was
initiated
into the Mysteries, while Socrates was rejected, and in the course of
time
he was even doomed to die, because, though not initiated into the
Mysteries,
he revealed a part of them to the world through the agency of his daimonion,
of which he himself was not consciously aware.
Dana Paramita - The Perfection Beyond Giving
Muriel Daw, Paramitas Of Perfection, Blavatsky Lecture 1987,
TPH-London, p. 7
[The Paramitas are 10 virtues as enumerated in Buddhist
literature.
H.P. Blavatsky, one of the founders of the Theosophical Society, uses
six of these (adding a seventh that is not usually in the list of
paramitas) in her classic 'The Voice of the Silence'. Muriel Daw,
comments on the ten Buddhist virtues using references from Blavatsky.
The Dana Paramita is the paramita of giving, or generosity.]
Traditionally there are four kinds of Giving: the ordinary giving of
material goods; the special gift of teaching; the great gift of
fearlessness; and the secret gift of giving away oneself. If we can
only give away all sense of separate self, then nothing remains but
sheer joy.
As far as the gift of Material things is concerned, Madame Blavatsky
told us in The Key to Theosophy: When you give, give with your own
hands, not through someone else. (*) Such advice is all part of the
training. These ideas were not set down in all the great religions as
any kind of pious sentimentalism. They exist for good hard practical
reasons.
The special symbol for Dana, the Perfection of Giving, is Liquorice
Root. A sweet is always a pleasant thing to offer, but this is also
medicine. In this way we learn that only if we give what is both wanted
and needed will it be helpful. Examples are only too common of things
being given that are wanted but not needed, and the other way around.
Even right at the beginning, we can all try to make one voluntary gift
- attentiveness, with no thought of oneself at all. To listen fully and
attentively is a sharing, and is of far more value than a mental
consideration of the problem, and then advice 'If I were you ...'. In
this separate sense I am not you, and never will be. No one can solve
another's problems. Attentive listening is a gift which strenghtens the
troubled one, and offers a mirror to help him solve his own problems.
(*) See page 244 in the 1968 edition.
To Know Theosophy
The Path, February, 1888.
You say that for three years you have been endeavoring to study
Theosophy.
Such being the case, you will meet with but little
success. Divine
Wisdom can not be a subject for study, but it may be an object of
search.
With the love for this same wisdom uppermost in our hearts, we ask you
if
it would not be wiser to lay aside the study of so called Theosophy,
and
study youself. Knowing yourself you know all men, the worlds
seen and
occult, and find Theo-Sophia. One cannot absorb Theosophy as a sponge
does
water, to be expelled at the slightest touch. Our conception
of Theosophy
is apt to be based upon the idea that it is an especial line of
teaching
- a larger, wider, and greater doctrine than others perhaps, but still
a
doctrine, and therefore limited. We must bear in mind that the true
Theosophist
belongs to no cult or sect, yet belongs to each and all; that
he can
find the true object of his search equally well in the Hebrew bible and
in
the Yoga philosophy, in the New Testament as well as in the
Bhagavad-Gita.
Inner Strength
If
you can start the day without caffeine or pep pills,
If
you can be cheerful, ignoring aches and pains,
If
you can resist complaining and boring people with your troubles,
If
you can eat the same food everyday and be grateful for it,
If
you can understand when loved ones are too busy to give you time,
If
you can overlook when people take things out on you when,
through
no fault of yours, something goes wrong,
If
you can take criticism and blame without resentment,
If
you can face the world without lies and deceit,
If
you can conquer tension without medical help,
If
you can relax without liquor,
If
you can sleep without the aid of drugs,
If
you can do all these things,
Then
you are probably the family dog.
Correspondence on Love
Michael
Evans
Just a note to say hello and thank you for all the effort you have put
into this site. real generosity, greatly appreciated. have you read
R.D. Liang's book The Politics of Experience? Could not a different
path of conditioning our children bring about a world attitude in time
that could be the very essence of what people like Krishnamurti comment
about. Knowing who we are, what we are doing and why we are doing it?
Is the quote below valid to you. Think Liang is correct here in what he
says:
"In order to rationalize our
industrial-military complex, we have to destroy our capacity to see
clearly any more what is in front of, and to imagine what is beyond,
our noses. Long before a thermonuclear war can come about, we have had
to lay waste to our own sanity. We begin with the children. It is
imperative to catch them in time. Without the most thorough and rapid
brainwashing their minds would see through our dirty tricks. Children
are not yet fools, but we shall turn them into imbeciles like
ourselves, with high I.Q.'s, if possible.
From the
moment of birth, when the Stone Age baby confronts the
twentieth-century mother, the baby is subjected to those forces of
violence, called love, as its mother and father, and their parents and
their parents before them, have been. These forces are mainly concerned
with destroying most of its potentialities, and on the whole this
enterprise is successful. By the time the new human being is fifteen or
so, we are left with a being like ourselves, a half-crazed creature
more or less adjusted to a mad world. This is normality in our present
age.
Love and violence, properly
speaking, are
polar opposites. Love lets the other be, but with affection and
concern. Violence attempts to constrain the other's freedom, to force
him to act in the way we desire, but with ultimate lack of concern,
with indifference to the other's own existence or destiny.
We are effectively destroying
ourselves by violence masquerading as love."
So much we do is done without any reflection at all. Reaction. So many
aspects of life are just overlooked. We use words to communicate, give
them meaning which, in many cases, is not accurate. So many examples.
Take the word Justice. In America with its Christian roots that word
means to be right, to be fair. That is how a dictionary would define
justice. So here in the USA, when the state executes a condemned man,
they say "Justice has been done." Where is the rightness and fairness
in killing a living being? How do those that loved the condemned man
get justice from his death? How do those that loved the victim realize
justice by the state killing someone? So, in the USA we use the word
justice when in fact we mean punishment, extracting a pound of flesh
for a perceived wrong, retribution, vengeance, etc. As H. I. Khan said
"justice is knowing when to say I must not do. this." Is that alone not
fair and right? If we are going to take the path of conditioning folks
let us at least do it so that at least some of the skills to live a
life full of love and understanding have been placed into our childrens
minds?
Thanks again for the lovely
site. me ke aloha pumehana, michael evans
Previous issues of
Lucifer7 can be found at the online index of
Lucifer7
I want to thank all of you who support me, whether financially, by commenting or just be reading and enjoying what I put online. To those who wonder: no, I don't mind if people link to my website(s). In fact: it's appreciated. For instance: my blog will find new readers faster if people aren't afraid to share it with friends and link to it.
Almost settled into my new apartment - everything painted, the first Buddha picture up, curtains hung, the floors reasonably well done (though not finished), half of my books still in boxes, but I still managed.... See below :)
New online
Short Quotes Getting the Blavatsky Collected Writings indexed in Google The Shekinah of Israel
The Perverse in Human Nature, Edgar Allan Poe
Fragment of this article from Protogonos #25, June, 1996
On August 4, 1789, a large and unruly Parliament
of excited men sat in a hall at Versailles. It was the National Assembly
of revolutionary France, and it was framing a new constitution for the country.
But what was agitating the assembly at the moment was the preamble to that
constitution - a Declaration the Rights of Man. Suddenly one of the members
interposed with an amendment. He proposed that the Declaration of Rights
of Man should also be a Declaration of the Duties of Man. His amendment was
impatiently rejected, the majority being 575 against 433; and the assembly
proceeded to adopt almost unanimously the motion that preamble should consist
only of a Declaration Rights.
Human nature has not changed much
since then. We still hear much about the rights of man. About the duties
we do not hear quite so much. The lesson is applicable to the present situation,
if at all.
When we demand our rights,
or promise other people their rights, the motive concerned is self-interest,
the self-interest of an individual or of a class. When duties are spoken
of, it is conscience that is appealed to. Which is better for the welfare
and progress of the individual - self-interest or conscience? Which is better
for the welfare of the community?
Paul Brunton, Essays on the Quest, Chapter X
The truth brings with it great serenity and also great
independence. He is no longer at the mercy of others for his happiness.
Buddhist Meditation, Samdhong Rinpoche, p. 14
It cannot be emphasized too often that meditation is not easy and can
often become dangerous, leading the slipshod meditator into an abnormal
life.
Occultism is concerned with the inner man, who must be strengthened and freed
from the dominion of the physical body and its surroundings, which must become
its servants. Hence the first and chief necessity of Chelaship is a
spirit of absolute unselfishness and devotion to Truth; then follow
self-knowledge and self-mastery.
Getting the Blavatsky Collected Writings indexed in Google
As you have seen above, I put the Blavatsky Collected Writings
online again this month. Despite having given that fact a decent amount
of publicity, Google hasn't yet decided to index all the articles in
the Collected Writings. Needless to say: this is unfortunate.
Here's
what you all can do to help get Blavatsky's work indexed, so
we can all find what Blavatsky wrote about a certain subject by
going to Google or my search page:
Any link will help
Get
your local lodge, your personal myspace page, your facebook profile, or
any other website you have relations with (where it's appropriate) to
link to my website or specifically to
http://www.katinkahesselink.net/blavatsky/ You can use for instance the following code: <a href="http://www.katinkahesselink.net/blavatsky/">H.P. Blavatsky Collected Writings Online</a>.
(copy paste it) This will work on myspace, and on most blogs. If you
don't know how to put a link on your website, or your lodge website -
go ask the person who can.
If you want to go a step
further, link to your favorite article of the Blavatsky Collected
Writings, or your favorite volume, or all of them. This will help make
sure that particular article will be indexed by Google, or that
particular volume will.
Promotion helps too
Let
anyone who might be interested know that the Collected Writings are
online again. Most theosophical forums have been notified, but if you
know of esoteric or occult online forums that haven't - let them
know.
If many of you do this, the Collected Writings
will be indexed faster. It may still take some time, but that's just
the way Google works.
"Open Thou mine eyes, that I may see wondrous things out of The
Law".
The Song of Solomon is one of the holiest portions of the Old Testament,
for it represents in poetry the Union of the Father-GOD with the Mother or
Love Aspect, His Complementary Opposite, His Completion and Perfection, the
Shekinah of Israel. The word Shekinah is derived from the verb shachan,
to dwell within. The Shekinah is the Inhabiting Glory, the Indwelling
Light. Her chief symbol is all-permeating, Universal Illumination,
seen clairvoyantly in olden days around the Ark of the Covenant.
A vision of the Shekinah is similar to the vision of the Holy Grail, in
that it comes only to him who lives a pure and spiritual life. When Moses
descended from Mt. Sinai after his great vision of God in His Fullness, during
which he became powerfully clairvoyant and clairaudient, his face was seen
to be illuminated by the Holy Light, all that remained of his contact with
the Ineffable Glory. According to tradition the Light was seen of old to
shine forth from between the shoulders and the fingers of the officiating
Priest in the Temple at the moment when he spoke the words recorded in Numbers
VI, "The Lord make His Face to shine upon you and be gracious unto you."
The exquisite perfumes which occasionally pervade a house or a person
are thought by some occult students to be due to a temporary presence of
the Shekinah, perhaps indicating that goodness spreads around an appropriate
atmosphere, for many persons of fine character have been known to give out
sweet odours - notably Walt Whitman, some of whose friends have testified
to the fragrance shed abroad by his body.
There are two aspects of the Mother, the Higher and the Lower Shekinah
- the Supernal Shekinah and that which manifests in Matter. If
we accept the teaching of the Levitical Doctrine (now-a-days being marvelously
justified by the findings of modern science), that there is Divine Intelligence
in every particle of matter, we see that the Shekinah is universally indwelling,
permeating all things. She is Spirit, dwelling within both Man and
Nature. She is Tebunah, Understanding, Intelligence, Insight, Intuition,
illuminated by Love. She is the passive, negative aspect, the Darkness,
the Sheltering Mother in Whom all things come to birth. And yet she
is Light, the Inhabiting Glory.
The Supernal Mother never descends to the Material Plane, but puts forth
into it a reflection of herself, an eidolon, called in the Kabalah the Spouse,
the Bride or the Queen, and sometimes the Daughter.
She manifests as Sound as well as Light. "Bas Qol", the Voice of
the Daughter, is the Divine Music caused by the stars and planets as they
plunge through space. Plato, who learned much from his study of the
Kabalah, called it "the Music of the Spheres".
In manifestation on the earth plane, Shekinah is still the Spouse of GOD,
His Complementary Opposite, the feminine aspect of Nature and Man.
The Zohar, one of the most important portions of the Kabalistic writings,
tells us of Four Worlds of Being: -
I. The World of Creation.
II. The World of Emanation.
III. The World of Formation.
IV. The World of Manifestation in Matter.
In the Worlds of Creation and Emanation there is no difference between
the Shekinah and GOD, for They are One, it is in the Worlds of Formation
and Manifestation that separation occurs, and manifestation on the Material
Plane becomes infinitely complex and varied.
G.R.S. Mead writes of:
"GOD the Father-Causative Essence.
"GOD the Mother-Formative Essence".
But the Shekinah remains the Complementary Opposite of Deity (without
Whom He could not manifest), no matter how lowly her manifestations, for
in all material things there is Spirit enclosed and enchained.
The Emperor Hadrian said to a great Rabbi named Joshua, that he would
like to see the Shekinah. Joshua told him to gaze upon the Sun.
"I cannot," said the Emperor. "Then if you cannot look upon GOD'S servant
the Sun, how can you expect to see the Shekinah?"
The Great Mother of Israel was adopted by the Roman Church together with
many of her symbols and attributes and incorporated in the Virgin Mary.
Isis, the Egyptian equivalent of Shekinah, was sometimes portrayed black
in color to symbolize the Sheltering Mother in whose body all things came
to growth in darkness and in mystery. In the Mystery Plays of the Middle
Ages the woman who took the part of the Virgin was clad in black garments,
and black images of the Virgin are still to be found in Churches in Central
Europe, usually credited with supernatural powers of Healing. There
is one such just over the borders between Saxony and Czecho-Slovakia.
On a table near the image are laid out reproductions of different parts of
the human body - legs, arms, eyes, ears, hands and so forth, as well as discarded
crutches, bandages, etc. The statue itself is hung with valuable jewels
offered by grateful invalids.
The feminine aspect of God the Father has been largely eliminated from
the Christian doctrine - so much the worse for the world. For it is
pointed out in the Zohar that the world will never be free from poverty,
misery and war until man and woman, masculine and feminine rule the world
in perfect equality.
The doctrine of the existence of the Shekinah does not conflict with the
strictly monotheistic faith of the Israelites, to whom the Deity was Duality
in Unity. The very last words spoken by a Jew in this world - or spoken
for him if he is incapable of speech - are:
"Hear ye, Israel, the Lord our GOD is One."
In spite of the belief that the Higher Aspect of Shekinah never descends,
she is said traditionally to have been present at important moments in the
history of Israel - for example, on Mt. Sinai during the interview between
GOD and Moses. In her Light Aspect she was present in the Pillar of
Fire and in the Burning Bush. She is invoked in the Night Prayers of
little children in Jewish homes - "On my four sides four Angels, above my
head the Shekinah". When Israel sins she departs from her, and "he
who walks haughtily crowds out her feet."
Tradition tells us that the Shekinah, when manifesting in form, had wings,
and that when Moses died, he was symbolically laid to rest amid her feathers.
This reminds us of the passage in the 91st Psalm: -
"He shall cover thee with His feathers and under His Wings shalt thou
trust."
No human being leaves this world without a vision of the Shekinah, it
is she who bestows the Living Spirit upon the newly risen to the Life of
Heaven. Then the soul is given a new vestment. In the case of
the "justified", or righteous, it is a garment of Light, seen at the Ascension
by the followers of the Lord Jesus, the sign of "Man made Perfect."
The risen spirit, having crossed the River of Death, is received on the
further shore by the Holy Mother, the Dweller in the Supernal and is given
the Sacred Kiss, the Kiss of Infinite Love.
The Perverse in Human Nature
Edgar Allan Poe, from The Black Cat
... When reason returned with the morning - when I had slept off the fumes of the night's debauch - I experienced a sentiment half of horror, half of remorse, for the crime of which I had been guilty; but it was, at best, a feeble and equivocal feeling, and the soul remained untouched. I again plunged into excess, and soon drowned in wine all memory of the deed.
In the meantime the cat slowly recovered. The socket of the lost eye presented, it is true, a frightful appearance, but he no longer appeared to suffer any pain. He went about the house as usual, but, as might be expected, fled in extreme terror at my approach. I had so much of my old heart left, as to be
at first grieved by this evident dislike on the part of a creature which had
once so loved me. But this feeling soon gave place to irritation. And then
came, as if to my final and irrevocable overthrow, the spirit of PERVERSENESS. Of this spirit philosophy takes no account. Phrenology finds no place for it among its organs. Yet I am not more sure that my soul lives, than I am that perverseness is one of the primitive impulses of the human heart - one
of the indivisible primary faculties, or sentiments, which give direction to the character of Man. Who has not, a hundred times, found himself committing a vile or a silly action, for no other reason than because he knows he should not? Have we not a perpetual inclination, in the teeth of our best judgment, to violate that which is Law, merely because we understand it to be such? This spirit of perverseness, I say, came to my final overthrow. It was this unfathomable longing of the soul to vex itself - to offer violence to its own nature - to do wrong for the wrong's sake only - that urged me to continue and finally to consummate the injury I had inflicted upon the unoffending brute. One morning, in cool blood, I slipped a noose about its neck and hung it to the limb of a tree; - hung it with the tears streaming from my eyes, and with the bitterest remorse at my heart; - hung it because I knew that it had loved me, and because I felt it had given me no reason of offence; - hung it because I knew that in so doing I was committing a sin - a deadly sin that would so jeopardize my immortal soul as to place it - if such a thing
were possible - even beyond the reach of the infinite mercy of the Most Merciful
and Most Terrible God...
Previous issues of Lucifer7 can be found at the
online index of Lucifer7
I want to thank all of you who have supported my web endeavours by donating money,
linking to any of my online projects, forwarding this newsletter,
spreading the news, generally encouraging me and letting me know about
mistakes. It's all appreciated even if I can't thank every one of you
personally.
On a personal note: I'll be moving house this week and settling in the next. I'll be moving within Leiden, The Netherlands - but getting my own place after 4 years of living with my grandmother.
Short Quotes New on Katinka Hesselink Net New spirituality on squidoo Theosophical Elections: Radha Burnier for another 7 years
What is the Self?
Zen Story Correspondence
Short Quotes
Talbot Mundy, Queen Cleopatra
The wise will ever modify a plan, and only fools are
obstinate. But
what the gods have disapproved they wipe out utterly.
H.P. Blavatsky, Voice of the Silence, 17.
Saith the Great Law: "In order to become the knower
of
ALL-SELF, thou hast first of Self to be the knower.
N. Sri Ram, Thoughts For Aspirants, Second Series
Self-knowledge, even in its beginnings, gives rise to wisdom.
Paul Brunton, The Inner Reality, Chapter V
The kingdom of heaven is nothing more or less than a condition
of
inward
freedom.
I
confess myself disappointed: the results of the elections are in, and
Radha Burnier won again. I guess this means John Algeo
will remain vice president. It's to be hoped that come next election
some younger candidates (say in their fifties or something) will be
nominated. I hope we aren't heading for a situation where it's
tradition for the president to die before a new one gets instated.
What is the Self?
H. T. Edge, Theosophical Forum, February, 1941
"A self is not something you are endowed with at
birth. It
is something you are continually creating as you live your day-to-day
life."
The above was found in The Reader's Digest, and is given as
being
adapted from a book called The Self You Have to Live With, by Winfred
Rhoades. As we do not know what else the author may have said, we
cannot presume to
comment on his views; but the quotation serves as a convenient text for
remarks
on the problem of what constitutes a Self.
There are those who argue that the Self is simply the
sum-total of
out mental states, built up bit by bit in the way described. In this
case however the Self would be a mere abstraction, a noun of multitude
as the grammarians might say. Or at best it would be a machine, made by
assembling parts, instead of being an organism with parts built around
a vital germ. No organism can be created by the mere assemblage of
parts. We need to know who or what
it is that brings all these various elements together and unites them
into
a whole. The mental states, habits, ideas, emotions, memories, etc., do
not constitute the Self, they display it. They are the garments in
which the Self clothes itself. When dissolution takes place, it is
certain that the phantasmagoria which we have been calling ourself will
dissolve; but this
does not mean that nothing will be left. It means a change similar to
what
we undergo during life, but of a greater degree. Myself of today is the
same,
and yet not the same, as myself of forty years ago. No doubt the
ultimate
Self, the Atman, is a universal principle; but we know that in each man
this
Self gathers to itself skandhas or attributes or vehicles (one is
obliged
to use vague words), which give to each human being his own distinct
individuality.
When the attributes peculiar to physical life are dispersed, there
still
remain attributes proper to other planes. Our attempts to imagine this
Self,
as it will be after physical death, will remain deceptive and futile
until
we have lifted some veils of initiation; and even then it will not be
possible to put what we see into ideas understandable to the ordinary
intellect.
What we learn in books is like a map of the country which we shall
enter;
it points the way but does not reveal the details.
Zen Story
Source unknown, from D.P., Protogonos 33, September 1998
There once lived a great warrior. Though quite old, he still
was
able
to defeat any challenger. His reputation extended far and wide
throughout
the land and many students gathered to study under him.
One day an infamous young warrior arrived at the village. He
was
determined to be the first man to defeat the great master. Along with
his strength, he had an uncanny ability to spot and exploit any
weakness in an opponent. He would wait for his opponent to make the
first move, thus revealing a
weakness, and then would strike with merciless force and lightning
speed.
No one had ever lasted with him in a match beyond the first move,
Much against the advice of his concerned students, the old
master
gladly accepted the young warrior's challenge. As the two squared off
for battle, the young warrior began to hurl insults at the old master.
He threw dirt and spit in his face. For hours he verbally assaulted him
with every curse and insult known to mankind. But the old warrior
merely stood there motionless and calm. Finally, the young warrior
exhausted himself. Knowing he was
defeated, he left feeling shamed.
Somewhat disappointed that he did not fight the insolent
youth, the
students gathered around the old master and questioned him. "How could
you endure such an indignity? How did you drive him away?"
"If someone comes to give you a gift and you do not receive
it," the
master replied, "to whom does the gift belong?"
Correspondence
Just a note to say hello and thank you for all the effort you
have put into this site. real generosity, greatly appreciated. have you
read R.D. Liang's book The Politics of Experience? Could not a
different path of conditioning our children bring about a world
attitude in time that could be the very essence of what people like
Krishnamurti comment about. Knowing who we are, what we are doing and
why we are doing it? Is the quote below valid to you. Think Liang is
correct here in what he says:
"In order to rationalize our industrial-military complex, we
have to destroy our capacity to see clearly any more what is in front
of, and to imagine what is beyond, our noses. Long before a
thermonuclear war can come about, we have had to lay waste to our own
sanity. We begin with the children. It is imperative to catch them in
time. Without the most thorough and rapid brainwashing
their minds would see through our dirty tricks. Children are
not yet fools, but we shall turn them into imbeciles like ourselves,
with high I.Q.'s, if possible.
From the moment of birth, when the Stone Age baby confronts
the twentieth-century mother, the baby is subjected to those forces of
violence, called love, as its mother and father, and their parents and
their parents before them, have been. These forces are mainly concerned
with destroying most of its potentialities, and on the whole this
enterprise is successful. By the time the new human being is fifteen or
so, we are left with a being like ourselves, a half-crazed creature
more or less adjusted to a mad world. This is normality in our present
age.
Love and violence, properly speaking, are polar opposites.
Love lets the other be, but with affection and concern. Violence
attempts to constrain the other's freedom, to force him to act in the
way we desire, but with ultimate lack of concern, with indifference to
the other's own existence or destiny.
We are effectively destroying ourselves by violence
masquerading as love."
So much we do is done without any reflection at all. Reaction.
So many aspects of life are just overlooked. We use words to
communicate, give them meaning which, in many cases, is not accurate.
So many examples. Take the word Justice. In America with its Christian
roots that word means to be right, to be fair. That is how a dictionary
would define justice. So here in the USA, when the state executes a
condemned man, they say "Justice has been done." Where is the rightness
and fairness in killing a living being? How do those that loved the
condemned man get justice from his death? How do those that loved the
victim realize justice by the state killing someone? So, in the USA we
use the word justice when in fact we mean punishment, extracting a
pound of flesh for a perceived wrong, retribution, vengeance, etc. As
H. I. Khan said "justice is knowing when to say I must not do. this."
Is that alone not fair and right? If we are going to take the path of
conditioning folks let us at least do it so that at least some of the
skills to live a life full of love and understanding have been placed
into our childrens minds?
Thanks again for the lovely site. me ke aloha pumehana,
michael evans
Previous
issues of Lucifer7 can be found at the online index of
Lucifer7
There is an
international theosophical conference
coming up - the website is a bit of a mess. Details on where, when and
how are scattered throughout. It seems to be held in Philadelphia, USA,
August 7th through August 10th, 2008. I'm not sure about this, because
the website also mentions something about Athens, Greece (which is in
Europe, right?).
Subjects are: Integrating the Six Schools of
Indian Philosophy for the Purpose of Global Dialoge, The
Timeless
Message of the Upanishads, Islam and the Theosophical
Doctrine,
The Practical Philosophy of the Sufis, Does the Absolute Love You?,
Living the Higher Life and last but not least: Neuroplasticity: Modern
Truths for Making the Brain Porous to the Influences of the Soul and
Synesthesia:
Hearing Colors, Seeing Sounds: The Return of an Ancient Sense. The
names of the speakers on these subjects are not listed - which is
unfortunate as it would be nice to know what the qualifications are of
the people talking about such abstruse subjects.
These are some of the subjects I'm interested in myself, so
I'm very sorry I won't be attending.
Short
Quotes
Mental Slavery, Blavatsky, (BCW III, 225)
"Alive to the truism that every path may eventually lead to
the highway as every river to the ocean, we never reject a contribution
simply because we do not believe in the subject it treats upon, or
disagree with its conclusions. Contrast alone can enable us to
appreciate things at their right value; and unless a judge compares
notes and hears both sides he can hardly come to
a correct decision. Dun vitant stulti vitia, in contraria currunt
['while striving to shun one vice, fools run into its opposite.'] - is
our motto; and we seek to prudently walk between many ditches without
rushing into either. For one man to demand from another that he shall
believe like himself, whether in a question of religion or science is
supremely unjust and despotic. Besides, it is absurd. For it amounts to
exacting that the brains of the convert, his organs of perception, his
whole organization, in short, be reconstructed precisely on the model
of that of his teacher, and that he shall have the same temperament and
mental faculties as the other has. And why not his nose and eyes, in
such a case? Mental slavery is the worst of all slaveries. It is a
state which, as brutal force has no real power, always denotes either
an abject cowardice or a great intellectual weakness."
N.
Sri Ram, Thoughts For Aspirants, Second Series
The first
step in self-knowledge is to become aware of that hard shell in our
natures, which is compounded of our settled habits of thought and
action, a thing of shadows opaque to the rays of our own understanding.
The very awareness
of its existence makes way for the rays of one's intelligence and
starts
the process of its dissolution.
Paul Brunton, The Secret
Path, Chapter XI
Once you have placed yourself in the hands of the Overself
within, your
life
will begin to flow more serenely and more sweetly.
...
You may falter or even fail in applying this knowledge, but
the
Overself
is infinitely patient and will be ready to assist you in its own way
when
you are ready to invoke its presence.
...
You must refer inwards to the Overself until the habit becomes
first
thought,
second nature and sixth sense.
Masters
and Men
Ernest E. Wood, Canadian Theosophist, Volume 29, #2 (1948)
Reading over and over again the many statements that have been
made and
suggested about the relation of masters, or adepts, or nirvanees, or
liberated
men, to unliberated men or reincarnating men, I have often thought of
trying
to formulate some principles. We have a great deal of information
before
us in the Mahatma Letters to Mr. Sinnett, and various Mahatma Letters
to
other persons, and suggestions and reports from various
sources. Out
of these certain main principles clearly arise.
(1) Masters do not interfere with personal karma. They do not
act so as
to reduce the impacts of any particular karmas upon us. To take an
example,
they do not protect us from our enemies. The reason for this is
perfectly
clear. We need our karma. We need our enemies. If I am to attain the
highest
power of love I certainly need those enemies. Some love I can develop
in
relation to my friends and to those who are kind to me. That is an easy
matter,
but to rise to the full height of love is another matter. For the
completion
of my realization of unity in feeling I need the opportunity which only
my
enemies can give.
This is a thought that applies to the development of the mind
and of the
will as well as to the development of love. It will be asked why in
that
case we should extol the conduct of any unliberated man who protects us
from
our enemies. The answer is that we unliberated men are living together
in
one world. We are doing things together and gradually forming that kind
of
society which is integrated by love. Just as every act of creative mind
on
materials of various kinds brings them into a unity of form and
relationship,
so does the creative act that we call love bring varied human, beings
into
a unity that we call society, or social order. It is imperative in such
an
order that the elements or parts must be different. If I am not
different
from my neighbor I cannot perform a special part in that organism.
Briefly,
variety is necessary to unity. It is when a man has harmonized his love
to
all varieties of men that he attains liberation.
The Masters as liberated men are no longer engaged in the
karmic business
of forming parts of a social organism. That is a work which is not an
end
in itself, but for each of us fitting in to that organism is really an
act
of self-fulfillment. Just as a painter paints a picture under the
impulse
of a central urge in his own life and while making the picture really
makes
himself, so that when the picture is done he no longer needs it and
puts
it aside, yet retains in himself all the awakening or growth that he
has
attained by the effort, so also the production of social harmony
through
love is only an external work, not an end in itself, and it remains
forever
an eternal effort for all unliberated men. This is no work for masters,
since
it is no end in itself and has no intrinsic value. It belongs to the
karmic
world, outside their precincts.
(2) Masters, it is said, can influence the minds of men, but
they do not
do this. Inasmuch as every man's growth depends upon the exercise of
his
own thought, love and will, upon the objects of his own experience,
that
is, upon his own karma, there would be no point in inoculating him with
a
foreign strength for that purpose. Man is not in a school built for him
by
somebody else, and made to go through a series of tests devised by a
mind
other than his own, but he is at all times faced with his own
particular
karma exactly suited to his needs because it is the expression of his
own
imperfect work in the past. An artist painted a picture
yesterday,
putting all his best into it. Today he looks at it and says,
"Not good
enough." That is so because in putting all his power into the effort -
his
thought, feeling and will - he became a better artist than
before.
Now, looking at his picture, he will find it painful in some degree and
will
set about altering it or painting a new one. There is no disharmony
between
man and the world of his experience, it is the perfect method of self
education.
If some greater artist were to come in and do the artist's next picture
for
him, it would be no real help to him.
(3) If Masters do not save us from our karmas, and do not
strengthen our
minds, what do they do? I have been much impressed by the statement
that
their function in relation to unliberated mankind is to remind that
mankind
of its spiritual origin and power. Not more than that. That
is indeed
a karma that men deserve, but what use they will make of it depends
upon
themselves. All environment is only opportunity. This, too, is
opportunity,
and Masters are our environment to this extent.
No doubt in the past thousands upon thousands of men have
passed from
the unliberated to the liberated state. They have not done that without
the
aid of unliberated men. In their day they had their enemies, and with
the
aid of those enemies they developed the love which was part of their
attainment.
That is one example of what those liberated men owe to us who were
their
enemies away in the past. They are not separated from us.
The function of reminding mankind of their spiritual power and
destiny
does not interfere with either karmas or minds. Inasmuch,
therefore,
as any one of us opens himself up to the reception of that piece of
environment,
turns his attention fully upon it with thought and love and the
intuition
of the will, he is "in touch with the master".
(4) I think of nirvana, or the beyond, or the state of the
liberated men,
as a world in which the very sands of the seashore are living Buddhas.
I
think of that world as not far away but as close and intimate to us as
any
kingdom of nature that we know, as in its own manner enfolding us and
pressing
upon us as much as the earth's atmosphere presses in its own way upon
our
bodies all the time.
We can perhaps understand this better if we remember that we
are in contact
with life in every kingdom of nature. A very undeveloped man
does not
know much of the life in his fellowman. To him other people are merely
animated
objects in his environment. He has not paused to see the inside of
them,
to feel their feelings and to say to himself, "There is a man in
there".
But as we become more developed we find ourselves living among
fellowmen
who incidentally have bodies.
In course of time and as a result of our education our
experience or perception
of life increases, so that we are aware of it in animals and plants,
and
even in the minerals to some extent. I compare the following
pictures:
First, I am sitting on a nice green carpet; secondly, I am
sitting
on a lawn. Why am I so much happier sitting on the lawn than sitting on
the
green carpet? What is it that gives me this feeling? When I look at
this
matter closely I find that when sitting on the lawn I have some
fellow-feeling
with the grass and the bushes and trees that are around. It is because
I
am in some degree aware of life in these things that they mean so much
more
to me and can teach me such a better lesson. This is true of
the animals
also and even of the minerals. When I walk on the earth I ought to feel
that
as a companionship and I believe I do if at any time I go into the
garden
with my bare feet. I do not mean that in any of these things we should
people
the earth and the woodlands with all sorts of gnomes and fairies in our
imagination.
That is an extra thing. It is important to us that we are
living with
life. The animals, the plants and the mineral world are life;
their
forms are only incidental.
When you come to think of it the mineral and other forms that
we see are
only the karmic production of those lives, and as their karmic
productions
are the outposts of their consciousness just as our karmic productions
are
outposts of ours, really we are dealing with life only, and living
among
life. And as it is with feeling rising to the height of love that we
become
conscious of life in our fellowmen, so it is that the treatment of all
these
things with the feeling consciousness, not merely with the thinking
mind,
will give us our knowledge of reality.
(5) Apart from and in addition to the reminders that we get
from the Masters,
we have always an open channel to their world in what we call the will.
The
Masters have been called the Inner Government of the World. Let us
understand
that word "inner", and let us never confuse it with any conception of
the
outer government of the world. It is true that each one of us is the
complete
and utter slave of that inner government of the world. Each one of us
has
an inner urge which sends him through his cycle of experiences in a
certain
manner, in a certain order, particular for each, and that urge comes
into
us from our Archetypes, which are our real selves resident in the
beyond
in perfect harmony with all liberated men. There is our point of rest,
our
point of strength, our unchanging basis, the unity in all our varieties
of
experience, that stamps its character and mark on every true act of our
will.
I must resort to an illustration. My hand and arm act in
obedience to
their own nature and quality. They carry out the behests of the brain
without
any constraint of their own nature. Such action is indeed the
advancement
and fulfillment of their own character. Thus do my fingers act in a
service
which is perfect freedom for them because it is the fulfillment of
their
own nature, and indeed my fingers become better fingers, more supple
and
delicate and sensitive in the performance of this work well-directed
from
within. But if some strong man were to come along and take hold of my
arm
with his hand and pull it here and there, directing it from the outside
what
to do, there would indeed be bondage and the negation of arm-progress.
Similarly, when the will in me that directs my whole embodied
being responds
with intuition to the impulses of that archetype of which the beings of
the
liberated world are the custodians, in a sense, for me, so that I
follow
the correct cycles of effort in my embodied existence, there is no
bondage.
I am being myself. But if some other man from the outside,
acting and
speaking in the world of karmas and mind activities, tries to tell me
what
decisions I must make, what loves I must have, and what thoughts I must
think,
he is my enemy, my worst of enemies. To try to get between men and the
Master
or between me and the Master's world, and pull me about from the
outside,
is the worst thing that anybody can do. But if I have the intuition of
the
will, that man will be my beloved enemy.
"CATHOLIC GASOLINE"
Sister Mary Ann, who worked for a home
health agency, was out making her rounds visiting homebound patients
when she ran out of gas. As luck would have it, an Exxon Gasoline
station was just a block away.
She walked to the station to borrow a
gas can and buy some gas. The attendant told her that the only gas can
he owned had been loaned out, but she could wait until it was returned.
Since Sister Mary Ann was on the way to see a patient, she decided not
to wait and walked back to her car.
She looked for something in her car
that she could fill with gas and spotted the bedpan she was taking to
the patient. Always resourceful, Sister Mary Ann carried the
bedpan to the station, filled it with gasoline, and carried the full
bedpan back to her car.
As she was pouring the gas into her
tank, two Baptists watched from across the street. One of them turned
to the other and said, 'If it starts, I'm turning Catholic!"
Previous
issues of Lucifer7 can be found at the online index of
Lucifer7
Before
one can come to the truth, there has to be an attitude of humility,
absence of conceit, a recognition of his own limitations and
willingness
to learn.
Talbot Mundy, Queen Cleopatra
Blame is easy to lay and no man or no woman is perfect.
Commonly the greatest
fools and hypocrites are readiest to cast aspersion; and the wisest and
most
honorable are the slowest, ever qualifying accusation and withholding
judgment,
knowing that themselves in like predicament might blunder worse than
the
accused and might achieve less.
Paul Brunton, The Secret Path, Chapter VII
We may say that the person exists by virtue of, through the
life force
of, and by permission of the Overself.
Theosophical Elections
John Algeo and Radha Burnier are both running for president of the Theosophical Society with headquarters at Adyar.
John
Algeo has a website and gives his
vision of the work of the Theosophical Society which reads
like the perfect mix between conserving what's best from the past and
moving forward into the 21st century. John Algeo is a retired
professor of English, who's written a book on the differences between
American-English and British-English. His scientific approach shines
through in his work on 'The Letters of H.P. Blavatsky', volume 1 -
which caused a storm among fundamentalist Blavatskyan theosophists who
felt too many letters had been published there which they felt had not
actually been written by Blavatsky. I have personally felt for years
that he was the only likely candidate to step in Radha Burnier's shoes. John Algeo is less of a Krishnamurti enthusiast and as the
articles published (with his permission) on my website show,
more of a Blavatsky man. This really ought to please members of the
other theosophical organizations, but we can be sure they will find
some fault or other with him nonetheless.
There are several documents relating to this election online at teozofia.info.
There is discussion about Radha Burnier's Health as well as about John
Algeo's willingness to live at Adyar. On my website there is a lot of
information on the goals and aims of the Theosophical Society.
Personally
I feel that Radha Burnier has served the TS long enough and that her
health and age are such that it is a very bad idea that she be
president for another tenure. I have not yet received the
election-ballots yet - but I will be voting for John Algeo as the only
serious candidate. I was of the impression that a person can only be
president for two terms. Since our terms are seven years long, Radha
has been at the helm of the TS for fourteen years now. She has done the
TS good with uniting of Krishnamurti's and Blavatsky's messages,
but her negative attitude towards the Internet slowed the TS down
considerably when it the Internet was coming up a few years ago. While
she has since grown less vocal about this, I feel she is not the right
person to move the Theosophical Society into the 21st century. In her
letter (as published on Theos-talk) she says we need someone younger -
well, nobody younger was nominated. We will have to wait seven years
for that. Meanwhile: John Algeo is younger than Radha Burnier, though
78 according to Radha's e-mail.
In the online discussions there are several issues that get the limelight:
Radha's Health
The reports are mixed: some say her health is fine. Others say
her memory isn't what it used to be and the stroke she had roughly a
year ago has left its mark.
John's inability to live at Adyar
Radha makes a lot of John Algeo's likely preference for living
somewhere other than at the Adyar estate in Southern India. Since the
headquarters have been at Adyar most of the time since the Adyar estate
was bought in the 19th century, this would go against tradition. The
main reason for John not living there would be the health of his wife
Adele. Let's not make too much of this though: presidents of the
Theosophical Society generally don't live at Adyar year round anyhow:
they travel too much for lectures and connections to the various
sections of the TS. The place of any non-Indian president on the Estate
is going to be different from Radha's position. Radha speaks Tamil,
which is the mother tongue of the local people. Any Western president
would have to rely on aids for the running of the estate because of
that language barrier.
Radha Burnier's aversion to the Internet
Radha has gone on record against the Internet. She said at one
point that it could not replace face to face contact. This is really
besides the point. Books don't replace face to face contact either. I'm
not sure what her current position on this issue is, but she certainly
isn't an Internet advocate. In contrast: John Algeo has his own website.
Open versus closed
Unfortunately both candidates have been accused (I feel with
reason) of being closed off in their connection to ordinary members and
the world. But of the two, Radha is the most isolationist, I feel. Her
position on the Internet is a case in point. John addresses the issue
of communication on his website and therefore shows awareness of that
point. Of the two candidates Radha has been of the opinion that PR is
just not spiritually sound (it should not be necessary, because if we
live theosophy, we radiate it). John shows far more awareness of PR as
something that should at least be on the agenda. A modern organization
just can't do without some publicity - and this is something Blavatsky
and Olcott (both journalists) knew very well.
Some other issues are:
Blavatsky versus Krishnamurti
John Algeo is more of a Blavatsky based theosophist, while Radha
is more of a Krishnamurti person. Radha also quotes Blavatsky regularly
though. John has been known to comment on fantasy works like the Harry
Potter series. John Algeo was responsible for creating the first volume
of the Collected Letters of Blavatsky.
Spiritual teaching versus administration
Radha is very much a spiritual teacher as well as an
administrator. John Algeo's strengths include scholarship and
administration, but I don't think many would describe him as a
spiritual teacher. This is really the only sound reason to elect Radha
Burnier that I can think of.
India versus the world
The Theosophical Society is a world-wide organization, with
headquarters in India. John Algeo is an American. I feel that it is
good for the TS to have a mix of Indian and international presidents.
Radha has given the Indian voice a strong place in her presidency, as
she would: she is Indian, she knows Sanskrit. I feel it's time for the
rest of the world to have its say.
The procedure appears to be a direct vote.
This means that all members should vote, as it is my impression
that this is a tight race. I will personally vote for John Algeo as he
is younger, healthier and more modern.
Hail to the Unborn
From
Chicago TIME, January 25. Found in the Canadian Theosophist, Vol. 24, #1
(1943)
In a small town in Yugoslavia there lived a
man named Peter. He read
many books, dabbled in politics and married a girl named Maria.
When Maria was heavy with child, the Germans occupied Peter's
village and
took over his home and his business. Peter left to fight in
the woods
with the Yugoslav Partisans. He was shot several weeks later
but before
he died he took a stub of pencil and wrote a letter to his unborn son.
Partisans found Peter's body and the letter. While
they waited for a chance to deliver it, the letter was passed from hand
to hand and became in time a part of guerrilla folklore. By
now it may have been sharpened by the literacy of other men and given
added eloquence by the nobility of other men's minds. But
what it said was as true when it was scrawled on a scrap of paper in a
great whispering forest as it was when last week it reached London and
the outside world.
My child,
sleeping now in the dark and gathering strength for the struggle of
birth, I wish you well. At present you have no proper shape,
and you do not breathe, and you are blind. Yet, when your
time comes, your time and the time of your mother, whom I deeply love,
there will be something in you that will give you power to fight for
air and light. Such is your heritage, such is your destiny as
a child born of woman - to fight for light and hold on without knowing
why.
May the flame that tempers the bright steel of
your youth never die, but burn always; so that when your work
is done and your long day ended, you may still be like a watchman's
fire at the end of a lonely road - loved and cherished for your
gracious glow by all good wayfarers who need light in their darkness
and warmth for their comfort.
The spirit of wonder
and adventure, the token of immortality, will be given to you as a
child. May you keep it forever, with that in your heart which
always seeks the gold beyond the rainbow, the pasture beyond the
desert, the dawn beyond the sea, the light beyond the dark.
May
you seek always and strive always in good faith and high courage, in
this world where men grow so tired.
Keep your
capacity for faith and belief, but let your judgment watch what you
believe.
Keep your power to receive
everything; only learn to select what your instinct tells you
is right.
Keep your love of life, but throw away
your fear of death. Life must be loved or it is
lost; but it should never be loved too well.
Keep
your delight in friendship; only learn to know your friends.
Keep your intolerance - only save it for what your heart tells
you is bad.
Keep your wonder at great and noble
things like sunlight and thunder, the rain and the stars, the wind and
the sea, the growth of trees and the return of harvests, and the
greatness of heroes.
Keep your heart hungry for new
knowledge; keep your hatred of a
lie; and keep your power of indignation.
Now
I know I must die, and you must be born to stand upon the rubbish heap
of my errors. Forgive me for this. I am ashamed to
leave you an untidy, uncomfortable world. But so it must be.
In thought, as a last benediction, I kiss your
forehead. Good night
to you - and good morning and a clear dawn.
Here the letter ends. The day that the avenging Partisans
swept back into Peter's village they found that his widow had been
murdered a few days before her child would have been born.
The letter that his comrades could not deliver has become instead a
letter to all the unborn children in
the great, mad world.
Previous
issues of Lucifer7 can be found at the online index of
Lucifer7
New on Katinka Hesselink Net
New theosophical weblog
Found online
Short Quotes
Karma Now and Karma Then, J.J.
Karma as a Cure for Trouble
Heat and Cold
A
weblog by a few young theosophists (well, in our thirties and forties
so far). I've contributed a few posts and so have Chris Richardson and
Pablo Sender. So
far I've shared some of my ideas on religion, spirituality and
theosophy that are not yet christalized enough for full blown articles
on my own website. I will try to keep up links to my posts on this blog
on my page with all my
spiritual articles.
Petition
for peace in Tibet and support for the Dalai Lama
Theosophical
contacts in Tibet report that violence there does go both ways: Chinese
people get attacked by Tibetans and Tibetans get attacked by the
Chinese government. At the same time some people do have friendly
relations across the 'racial' divide. The longer violence continues,
the harder that will become, obviously.
"No man is conscious of more than that portion of his
knowledge that
happens to have been recalled to his mind at any particular time, yet
such is the poverty of language that we have no term to distinguish the
knowledge not actively thought of, from knowledge we are unable to
recall to memory. To forget is synonymous with not to
remember."
Shvetashvatara Upanishad
From The Upanishads, translated by Eknath Easwaran, 1987.
Reprinted from Nilgiri
Press.
He is the eternal Reality, sing the
scriptures,
And the ground of existence.
Those who perceive him in every creature
Merge in him and are released from the wheel
Of birth and death.
Buddha, Dhammapada, Translation Juan Mascaro
327: "Find joy in watchfulness; guard well your
mind. Uplift
yourself from your lower self, even as an elephant draws himself out of
a muddy swamp."
Mary Beljan
Life is unpredictable. Karma is just one of the ways chaos is
organized.
In the big view of things it is impossible to wrong anyone.
The
negative act and later positive "reward" or justice for the victim is
really all
one action. The later justice is inherent in being victimized. Cause
and
effect is "one thing" or one event in space-time, so to speak. While
three
dimensions has time being passed through in an infinite concantination
of
cause in effect. If one were to see things in four dimensions, or in
which
all time is in a stasis, or eternity, or in which time is an already
complete
dimension of space - then a cause and effect "unit" might be seen as an
existence
or thing in itself.
Mr. X banging Mr. Y over the head in 1996 C.E. exists as a
single
unit with both reincarnating in 3150 C.E., getting into an aero-car
accident, with Mr. X going, to the hospital and Mr. Y from insurance
getting a new
aero-car to replace his junker.
So in the big picture it is impossible to wrong anyone, which
isn't
an excuse to do bad things because of course the wrong-doer still pays
the
karma. In the short term, using machiavellian methods often pays off
because
karma is usually a slow mover. This makes it hard to maintain the high
ground
because in the short run ethical behavior is more often than not a
loser
to the unethical. The individual or personality who is wronged may
never
in this incarnation and personality see justice, because karma is so
slow
moving. So the individual who strives to maintain the ethical high
ground
is almost sure to be a martyr just based on the karma from one
lifetime.
So when someone finds himself wronged - from one side of the question,
it
is a cause for joy, because something good also just happened to him in
the eventuality of time. You can't fool Mother Nature.
Karma
as a Cure for Trouble (quote from this article)
By the Late Rev. Alex. Fullerton, Wilkesbarre, Pa.
Canadian Theosophist, Volume 26, #11 (1946)
"Yet how can this be?" it is honestly asked. "Do
poverty or
riches, feebleness or power, obscurity or rank, indicate the merit or
demerit I have gained?" "Not at all," answers Theosophy; but
your degree of happiness
does. Happiness does not depend on wealth or
station; sorrow
does not heedfully follow small means or small influence. Joy and
sadness
are conditions of the mind, influenced, no doubt, by bodily
surroundings, but not determined by them. The rich are not always
happy, hence not the standards
of past good; the poor are not always wretched, hence not the
standards
of past wrong-doing. It is the state of the mind, not the state of the
purse,
which shows what Karma implies in any case."
If any man once clearly sees that his present condition is but
the
result of his conduct in prior lives; that it means and expresses, not
merely what he has done, but what he is; that it is not an accident or
a freak or a miscarriage, but a necessary effect through invariable
law, he has taken the greatest step
towards contentment, harmony, and a better future. For note what clouds
this
conception clears away, and what impulses towards improvement it at
once
begets. The sense of injustice disappears. He may not, cannot, know the
past
careers of which he feels the now effects, but he knows what their
quality
must have been from the quality of those effects. He reaps as he has
sown.
It may be sad or pitiable or distracting, but at least it is just. Envy
disappears
also. Why should he envy the greater happiness of those who, after all,
have
a right to it, and which might have been his too if he had earned it?
Bitterness
is assuaged. There is no room for such when it is seen that the causes
for
it do not exist, and that the only person meriting condemnation is
oneself.
Best of all, there dies out resentment at Divine favoritism, that
peculiarly
galling belief that the Supreme Being is willful or capricious, dealing
out
joys and sorrows for mere whim, petting one child and chastising
another
without regard to moral worth or life's deserts. In such a
being
confidence
is impossible, and the only theory which can restore it is the theory
of
Karmic Law, a law which is no respecter of persons, regards each man
precisely
as any other man, notes the very smallest acts in its complete account
book,
enters their value in the precisest terms, and when the time of
settlement
arrives - be it in the same incarnation or in one far off on the great
chain
- pays it with scrupulous fidelity. Centering thus responsibility for
each
man's lot in himself alone, Karma acquits Providence, calms resentment,
abates
discontent, and vindicates justice.
But it does even more than this; it stimulates
endeavor. If we
are now what we have made ourselves, we shall be what we make
ourselves. The mold
of the future is in our hands today. The quality of later incarnations
does
not arise from chance, or from a Superior Will, but is simply such as
we
impart to them through our present. Responsibility, power, are ours
alone. It is just as certain that rebirth will be upon the lines we
trace in this life, as that the later part of this life will be upon
the lines traced in the former part. Rebirth is, in fact, an
expression of character, and character expresses what we are and
do. He, then, who desires a better reincarnation must better
his
present incarnation. Let him perceive the faults which mar
his
life - the sloth, the repining, the rashness, the thoughtlessness, the
covetous spirit, the evil of hatred or uncharity - and let him master
them. Above other faults, and embracing all, is that of
selfishness, the sad love of personal desire as against the rights, the
privileges,
the happiness of brother men, a love which inflames every lower element
in
the human constitution, and kills all higher and richer
sentiment. He
who would prepare for himself a happier rebirth, may begin by making
happier the lives of others. He may respect their rights,
consult
their feelings, extend their pleasures, generously sacrificing himself
that they may profit. As he so does, his own higher nature is
manifested, and finer satisfaction greet him with an unalloyed
delight. By a blessed law of being, he who
thus loses his life shall save it; for he not only tastes
richer
pleasure
than any possible through selfish effort, but he molds his character in
the
grace and beauty of true manliness, and he molds, too, that new
incarnation which is to fit the nature formed in this.
Certainly a principle which quickens the highest motives in
human
nature may well be the regenerator of human life. He who sees his
present as the product of his past self, who foresees that his future
will be the product of his present, who finds in Karma the unfailing
treasury for every effort and every toil, who desires that rebirth
shall have less of pain and more of gladness than he knows of here,
will seek in generous service to fellowmen the highest happiness of his
highest faculties, and trust for brighter incarnation to that law which
cannot break, that force which cannot fail.
Heat and Cold
-- Tom Brown Jr, from Tom Brown's Field Guide to Nature
Observation and Tracking (online
source)
I once asked Stalking Wolf, "Grandfather, how come you're not
cold in the winter or hot in the summer?"
He said, "I am, but heat and cold do not bother me."
I
asked why not, and after a long pause in which he seemed to be weighing
whether or not I was ready for his answer, he said,
"Because they're real."
Previous
issues of Lucifer7 can be found at the online index of
Lucifer7
Once we have set our will, which is an inclination of the heart, on
those things we can freely share instead of the things that divide,
brotherhood, freedom and co-operation will constitute our way of life.
Richard Tangye
During a very busy life I have often been asked, "How did you manage to
do it all?" The answer is very simple. It is because I did everything
promptly.
Talbot Mundy, Queen Cleopatra
"What superiority may we attain to without stirring enmity in
others?
Has it not been written on the face of nature? Wisdom counsels us to
seem
inferior, in secret gathering our spiritual strength, since enmity is
aimed
at virtue, seeking to reduce us to a common level with the human herd;
whereas
we should rise to an equal level with the gods."
Paul Brunton, The Secret Path, Chapter VIII
Once we push the gate of the mind slightly ajar and let the light
stream
in, the meaning of life becomes silently revealed to us.
This is a question frequently put by those who have been approached
by Theosophical propagandists. The man on the street, who rarely
goes to
church save on some high festival, often has more latent loyalty to the
Nazarene
than the professing church-goer. He senses something wrong with church
teaching,
he does not know what, and he is no student or scholar with ability to
put
things right. But reverence for Jesus comes natural to him, and he
feels
he can trust Jesus whatever the preachers may say, or threaten him with.
Whenever he opens his New Testament the first thing he reads is:
"His name
shall be called Immanuel," which, the church says, means God is with
us,
when it obviously means God is in us. There is the first difference
between church doctrine and the teaching of Jesus . . . Jesus taught
that the kingdom of Ouranos (the Greek word) is within you. The church
translates Ouranos as
Heaven and places it up in the sky or off somewhere in space.
Somewhere, at
any rate, not accessible by ordinary earthly means of communication.
That jars the man on the street, for he dislikes second-hand methods of
doing business.
The preacher tells him to pray for what he wants and his prayer will be
answered.
This does not stand experiment. The unanswered prayers are so far ahead
of
the answered ones that an answered prayer is always given publicity in
the
newspapers, like a testimonial for Soap.
Moreover, the man in the street believes in fair play, and agrees
that if he is to pray it ought to be as Jesus stipulates. So he turns
to The Lord's Prayer, and finds that there are only two things to be
prayed for that have to do with earthly life, and on inquiry he learns
from a friend that daily bread is a mistranslation and that the
petition is for "the bread of the Coming
Day," or as some preachers would say, "for the heavenly manna." As for
daily
bread and butter, he remembers that Jesus said that "your heavenly
father
knoweth that ye have need of these things" and it is needless to remind
him.
Never-the-less, the man on the street has often heard the preachers
reminding
God of his duties and giving him explicit instructions how he should
act
under the most complicated circumstances. The congregation always feels
that
with such a preacher God is in safe hands. The man in the street notes,
however,
that Jesus never attempts to advise God, but says, "NOT my will but
thine
be done, O Lord." The man in the street sees that Jesus is a positive
and
not a negative character, and must busy himself trying to find out what
the
will of God is, and concludes that Jesus expects him to do the same.
That
is what prayer is meant to do and why it should be done in secret, and
not
on the street corners like the Pharisees.
Another thing about Jesus that pleases the man in the street is that
Jesus is no accuser. He leaves that to the Adversary. Decent men do not
need to be accused. They will readily acknowledge their faults and make
good any damage
they may have done. Jesus only found fault with one class of men - the
Hypocrites.
Woe unto them, he said. They deceive themselves more than others, and
the
truth is not in them. To be lacking in truth, so that one cannot trust
one's
own judgment, is to be in a sorry case. Jesus was all truth, and the
man
in the street, in his weakness, swears by him.
The other thing in the Lord's Prayer, which was a request of a
personal kind was "Deliver us from evil." He found on inquiry,
that there were two Greek words used for evil or sin. One meant failure
or missing the mark and implies that a man has at least been trying. No
blame attaches to the man who honestly tries. The other word is
the one used in the Lord's prayer - Deliver us from uselessness or
worthlessness. That is a prayer indeed and few honest men fail to have
it in mind at all times. The man in the street likes fair play and has
no objection to the other petition with a condition bound to it -
Forgive us our transgressions as we forgive those who transgress
against us. This is a prayer for war times and for all who engage in
war, there is no other way to wipe the slate clean. A fair bargain,
thinks the man in the street.
All the rest is easy if we can fulfill these few rules. We need to do
so before we can hear the Hallowed Name, or expect the Kingdom to come
or the Will of the Father to govern the earth. The man in the
street had yet one more problem about God and Jesus who had said that
"I and my Father are one." That must mean one in mind and heart, for it
was not in things one could
see that such unity could be possible. Then he read what Paul had
written
to the Corinthians: "Know ye not that Jesus Christ is in you, unless
you
be reprobate?" That settled it. He read again: "Let that mind be
in
you which was in Christ Jesus." It was all a matter of mind and heart.
They
being right, the body would obey. So it is all in man himself,
whether
he enshrines the Divine man in himself or not. God is love.
Love
is not outside us but in our hearts. God is light. Light is not
outside
us for Light is Wisdom and Knowledge and enlightens the mind within us.
God
is spirit, and spirit is Breath and Life and is our very Being within
us.
None of the high and glorious things of life are outside us. God is in
us.
That is the precious secret that priests and soothsayers have tried to
hide
from us for centuries. So it may be that the man in the street, a
toil-worn pilgrim like Jesus himself, may become perfect even as the
Father in the inner
kingdom is perfect. For his is the power and the glory.
Out of the way, you miserable wretch!
A dervish was sitting by the roadside when a
haughty courtier with his retinue, riding past in the opposite
direction, struck him with a cane, shouting: ‘Out of the way, you miserable wretch!’
When they had swept past, the dervish rose and called after them: ‘May you attain all that you desire in the world, even up to its highest ranks!’
A bystander, much impressed by this scene, approached the devout man and said to him:
‘Please tell me whether your words were motivated by generosity of
spirit, or because the desires of the world will undoubtedly corrupt
that man even more?’
‘O man of bright countenance,’ said the dervish, ‘has
it not occurred to you that I said what I did because people who attain
their real desires would not need to ride around striking dervishes?’
...the Law of the Ladder. The ladder is here used as a symbol
to show that there should be a selective giving of goods, energy, or
spiritual
help. The Law of the Ladder simply says that you should not reach below
the rung upon which you stand, except to the first rung below you - in
order to help people. If you reach down too low, your efforts will be
wasted,
and you may be hurt. Or crucified.
[There are those that] accomplish more than they promise and act more
than they speak.
Paul Brunton, The Inner Reality, Chapter IX
Life is all-comprehensive, and has plenty of room for both action and
contemplation.
Neither is holier than the other.
Dutch proverb found online
A handful of patience is worth more than a bushel of brains.
[If someone can tell me which Dutch proverb this is a
translation of, I would be very grateful. I sure don't recognize it.]
Early Morning Thoughts II
R. L. A., Protogonos, March 1997
A battle has begun for some. It lies not on some distant
shore, but within. The weapons are not of metal, but of emotions,
desires and greed.
The Foe is not of man, but his ego supported by illusion. It
is raging day and night, day after day. The Warrior travels not out,
but within. 'Constantly bombarded by inprints planted throughout his
lifetime in the form of samskaras, blinding the Warrior from his SELF,
from that which we all are.
But fear not noble Warrior, your plight is not a lonely one.
Your allies lie just beyond the veil of deception. There you will find
your Strength, your Love and your Light.
Every moment Maya, like a seductive woman, temps you with her
fruits.
But have caution for her fruits are like chains that bind you from the
SELF.
Taste not this fruit noble warrior, for thou will fall victim to her
illusions.
She bares beauty, passion, and she feeds the ego. She builds a
fortress around the mind, holding you back from your True Self. But
caution noble
warrior, have not pride in your Quest, for this too is your foe.
Humility is your sword, kindness your shield, and discipline
your strength. These are all the weapons you will need.
Meditation and passivity
Buddhist Meditation, Samdhong Rinpoche, p. 57
It is dangerous to put the mind into a state of dullness. Some
people think that if they immerse themselves in an object and slide
into a sort of doze, that is meditation, and because their mind is no
longer scattered they think that they have stabilized it. But one does
not stabilize one's mind by letting it get absorbed in this manner; on
the contrary, it is the wrong approach to meditation because clarity
and attentiveness of mind are lost in this practice. Sometimes, by
sinking into this sort of drowsiness, after a period, people may
achieve a kind of peacefulness or a pleasurable feeling of physical and
mental well-being and relaxation. And if this state is maintained for a
longer period, the breathing may even stop for some time and they may
even think that they have reached the state of samadhi, but that is not
so. If people are in such a doze that the attentiveness, alertness,
active participation and clarity of mind are lost, concentration has no
meaning or value. Moreover, the positive qualities of mind will be lost
and it will become forgetful, inactive and lazy. We must, therefore,
take every precaution, right from the beginning [of
meditation-practice], that concentration on the object is accompanied
by attentiveness, alertness, clarity, and the active force of a
participating mind. When it is left unguarded, the mind behaves like a
monkey. It never rests on one point, but constantly moves hither and
thither. When the mind is steadied by concentration on one object this
activity begins to subside. It is important that the energy of the mind
should be channeled and directed to one object. During the process of
concentration the mind should not be lost or scattered but watched to
see that it does not move in different directions.
Preachers have fallen into the habit of treating the Parables
of Jesus
as literal historic narratives, those timed in the future being
interpreted
as prophetic descriptions of what will actually occur. The cumulative
effect
is to build up a conception of unreality about life which is fatal to
the
impressive character of the lessons to be taught. Many will say this is
all
nonsense, that everybody knows they are parables, and cannot make any
mistake.
But usually this is just where a very serious mistake is made, for they
are
applied to the outside world objectively, and not recognized as
Parables
of the Kingdom which is within us and subjective. I have heard hundreds
of
sermons in the last eighty years and am still hearing them on the radio
in
which the appeal is entirely objective without any attempt to indicate
the
subjective nature of the field of consciousness in which all real
religion
has its foundation. Children are very rarely instructed on this matter,
and
I have vivid recollections of sermons on the Parable of the Last
Judgment
when, as a child, I was on one occasion, so impressed with the
elaborate
detail and expansion of the spectacle that as far as I was concerned
our
eternal destiny was settled then and there. I was quite resigned being
a
Goat as I did not like the people who believed themselves to be Sheep.
It
was years before I began to understand that such preaching was all
illusion,
fabulous, or as we say today, Maya. The whole thing is in minds, the
Goat
temperament, the Sheep character, with all the habits, vices and
virtues,
growing together, under the judgment of the Master in our hearts,
impartially
deciding, as our will determines, what the desires we have cherished
will
produce. The Prodigal Son is in each one of us, and both the Elder
Brother
and the Fatted Calf, as well as the loving Father whom we scarcely ever
fully
recognize. We pray to our Father in Heaven, but he is nearer
than the
firmament. The man who had not on a wedding garment may be oneself in a
business
suit. The five foolish virgins are all within us, and the wise ones
too,
but we must elect which company we are going to keep if we expect to be
at
the marriage feast of the Son. The Priest and the Levite are going
strong
in us, especially when our help is needed, but the Good Samaritan is in
us
too, even if he be a bit slow sometimes in getting to the spot. These
familiar
stories are confined to the Gospels of Matthew, Mark and Luke. St. John
substitutes
Miracles for the Parables and with the same intension of conveying
spiritual
truth in the only way that things spiritual can be given meaning in
earthly
terms; pictorially, or by example, dynamically. St. Paul,
ever practical,
treats the Old Testament as allegory, and in this way it becomes a
golden
lexicon by which the hidden things of the Eternal may be translated
into
the language of time.
Previous
issues of Lucifer7 can be found at the online index of
Lucifer7
The
Dalai Lama wants to put it to the vote: Do his people want him to
reincarnate? I have a hard time not smiling because if his people say
'yes', he says he is considering appointing his reincarnation when he
is still alive. http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/faith/article2955350.ece
Short
Quotes
Talbot Mundy, Queen Cleopatra
"Now because there is a law of opposites it must appear that
there are two ways of arriving at a given goal. The one is violent, the
other not; and each way has a multitude of bypaths that may lead into
inertia, but
none of which connects the way of bloodshed with the way of peace. For
they
are separate, although their courses appear parallel; but that is only
an
appearance. One way leads toward the true goal, peace and patience
begetting
patience and peace, albeit often after many perils narrowly avoided.
But
he who travels by that other way sees nothing but a false goal that
recedes
as he advances, every act of violence inevitably giving impulse to
another
of its kind."
James Morgan Pryse, from
The Canadian Theosophist, March 15th, 1926
"The
spiritual truths of the past are identically the spiritual truths of
the present and the future. Time cannot swallow that which is
eternal."
Buddha, Dhammapada, Translation Juan
Mascaro
141 Neither nakedness, nor entangled hair,
nor uncleanliness, nor fasting, nor sleeping on the ground, nor
covering the body with ashes, nor ever-squatting, can purify a man who
is not pure from doubts and desires.
142 But although a man
may wear fine clothing, if he lives peacefully; and is good,
self-possessed, has faith and is pure; and if he does not hurt any
living being, he is a holy Brahmin, a hermit of seclusion, a monk
called Bhikkhu.
Paul Brunton, The Inner Reality, Chapter VI
Heaven can be entered after death only if we have already
entered it while
alive. This is the value of life in the flesh; there is no other
worthwhile
value that I know.
Editorial
Friends
and foes! Criticism is the sole salvation for intellectual salvation.
It is the beneficent goad which stimulates to life and action-hence to
healthy changes-the heavy ruminants called Routine and Prejudice. In
private as in social life, adverse opinions are like conflicting winds
which brush from the quiet surface of a lake the green scum that tends
to settle upon still waters.
H.P.
Blavatsky, Literary Jottings, CW XIII page 243.
In this year when the USA will perhaps vote a woman or a black man
to be its president (I do so hope for a Democratic president) - I wish
you all a happy and healthy 2008!
Katinka Hesselink
The Secret Doctrine
Alex Wayman, Canadian Theosophist, Volume 27, #8 (1946)
"On close observation, you will find that it was never the
intention of the Occultists really to conceal what they had been
writing from the earnest determined students, but rather to lock up
their information for safety-sake, in a secure safe-box, the key to
which is - intuition. The degree
of diligence and zeal with which the hidden meaning is sought by the
student, is generally the test - how far he is entitled to the
possession of the
so buried treasure." (Mahatma Letters)
"Indeed it
must be remembered that all these Stanzas appeal to the inner faculties
rather than to the ordinary comprehension of the physical
brain." (Proem to The Secret Doctrine)
So
it is apparent that The Secret Doctrine is difficult, not because
H.P.B. was individually obscure, but because it is not possible to
present Theosophy in a language which "all who run may read."
St. Paul cannot
too often be defended against the reproach cast upon him fifty years
ago by Dr. Goldwin Smith, touching the argument about the seed sown in
the ground that it must die before the new life can appear. The
Church would rather let St. Paul suffer in literary reputation as the
author
of I Corinthians than sacrifice their dogma. St. Paul was too well
versed
in rhetoric to go before the clever scholars of Corinth with a false
metaphor
and he did not do so. Goldwin Smith did not bring his knowledge of
Greek
to bear upon the passage, but accepted the interpretation of the Church
that
the corpse, already dead, was the seed sown in the earth that would
spring
to life again. The Church has made a graveyard discourse of this
chapter,
which St. Paul could not possibly have intended as verse 50 makes
evident.
As a graveyard exhortation to those who blindly believe in the
resurrection
of the physical body, could a more bitter mockery be conceived than the
closing verses: "O grave where is thy victory, O death where is thy
sting?"
What a difference when the chapter is read
as St. Paul intended it to
be: a paean of jubilant life and birth, of life more abundantly, of
birth
and rebirth on the physical earth, of birth in the psychic world, of
birth
in the noetic or spiritual world. All this is concealed from the
English-speaking reader by mistranslation of important words and the
apparent transposition of one or two verses. One Greek word
in particular appears to have
gained the enmity of the theologians. It is the word psuche, or psyche
in
English, the butterfly, applied by the Greeks to the human soul, which
flits
and flutters from flower to flower of the desires of life, so that a
man
changes from hour to hour, from day to day and from year to year, so
that
he is never the same at one period of life that he was at another.
Jesus
and Paul both use the word to represent the human soul or personality,
but
the translators do their utmost to conceal or camouflage this fact,
because
"saving the soul" is the great mission of the evangelical preacher,
though
Jesus taught that he who would seek to save his soul would lose it, the
changeable
personality having to be abandoned so that the stable spiritual Self,
the
ever present Christ principle, available to every man, may become the
basic
reality of his existence. The translators make Jesus say that
"he who
would seek to save his life shall lose it," which is nonsense. (See
Luke
ix. 24, and kindred passages for the substitution of life for
soul.)
A similar deception as found in the writings of St. Paul. Verse 44 of
this
15 chapter of I Corinthians may be studied as the basis of Goldwin
Smith's
charge of false metaphor. The Authorized Version reads: "It
is sown
a natural body; it is raised a spiritual body. There is a
natural body,
and there is a spiritual body." The word "Natural" should be
"psychic,"
and is so rendered in the margin of the Revised Versions of 1881-1886.
"Natural" conveys to people generally the meaning of common or
ordinary, so that the corpse is understood to be meant as what is
"sown" in the burial of a dead body. This is an entire misconception of
Paul's teaching. Burial in a grave of a dead body was not in his mind
at all. What he speaks of is the psychic body, sown at birth in a
physical body, to be raised in its reincarnation or resurrection, the
conditions mentioned duly applying to the psychic body which the
experiences of the disciple must change it into a more glorious
spiritual body or if he fails try again in another incarnation. These
conditions obviously do not apply to a body of flesh and blood as verse
50 makes plain. It, that is, the psychic body, is sown in corruption:
it is raised in incorruption: it is sown in dishonor (how can this
apply to the mortal bodies of our beloved ones?): it is raised in
glory: it is sown in weakness: it is raised in power: it is
sown a psychic body: it is raised a spiritual body. There is a psychic
body and there is a spiritual body. It depends wholly on the disciple
himself of what kind of flesh his next body shall consist of if
he reincarnates, whether he shall have a terrestrial or a celestial
body;
whether he shall share the glory of the sun or that of the moon or a
star.
If he is able to transcend the psychic world he will become a
quickening
spirit, for the "second man is the Lord from heaven."
It
is clear enough from all this that Paul used no false metaphor. The
psychic seed, which is the personality must die, as Jesus taught: "If
any man will come after me, let him deny himself and take up his cross
daily
and follow me. For whosoever will save his soul (psuche, personality)
will
lose it; but whosoever will lose his soul for my sake, the same shall
save
it." (Luke ix. 23, 24).
"I therefore, the prisoner
of the Lord, beseech you that ye walk worthy of the vocation wherewith
ye are called. With all lowliness and meekness, with long-suffering,
forbearing one another in love; endeavoring to keep
the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace . . . till we all come in
the
unity of the faith, and of the knowledge of the Son of God; unto a
perfect
man, unto the measure of the stature of the fullness of Christ."
(Ephesians
iv. 1, 2, 3, 13).
The Sweetness of Now
A hungry lion happened to see this man and began to chase him. The man
came to the edge of a cliff and fell into the abyss. On his way down,
he saw a branch and grabbed it. When he looked down, he saw another
lion waiting for him at the bottom of the ravine and when he looked up
he saw the first lion that had caused this predicament to start with.
At that very moment, two mice, one white and one black, started to gnaw
away at the very branch that was saving him from certain death and to
which he tenaciously clung. Just before the two mice were to completely
gnaw through the branch, the man saw a wild strawberry growing there.
Ah! How sweet it tasted!
The past and future are hungry lions that will devour you in
the present. The black and white duality of thought will gnaw away at,
and separate us from, the very Life to which we cling. Awareness of the
life of now is an indescribable sweetness.
Only now is real.
Previous
issues of Lucifer7 can be found at the online index of
Lucifer7
Online
& New on Katinka Hesselink Net Short Quotes Obituary
- Ton den Hartog California Fires burn theosophical archives Maya
or Illusion, H.P. Blavatsky
Progressive Revelation, George E. Creed
Mercy
and forgiveness should have the highest place in that branch of
Theosophy
which treats of ethics as applied to our conduct. And were it
not for
the perfect mercifulness of Karma - which is merciful because it is
just
- we ought long ago to have been wiped out of existence. The
very fact
that the oppressor, the unjust, the wicked, live out their lives is
proof
of mercy in the great heart of Nature. They are thus given
chance after
chance to retrieve their errors and climb, if even on the ladder of
pain,
to the height of perfection. It is true that Karma is just,
because
it exacts payment to the last farthing, but on the other hand, it is
eternally
merciful, since it unerringly pays out its compensations. Nor
is the
shielding from necessary pain true mercy, but is indeed the opposite,
for
sometimes it is only through pain that the soul acquires the precise
knowledge
and strength it requires. In my view, mercy and justice go
hand in
hand when Karma issues its decrees, because that law is accurate,
faithful,
powerful, and not subject to the weakness, the failure in judgment, the
ignorance
that always accompany the workings of the ordinary human judgment and
action.
Buddha, Dhammapada,
Translation Juan Mascaro
61 - If on the great
journey of life a man cannot find one who is better or at least as good
as himself, let him joyfully travel alone: a fool cannot help him on
his journey.
Paul Brunton, The Spiritual Crisis of Man, Chapter XII
No man may rightly say that he has had a full experience of
life if he
has not had any spiritual experience during life.
Practical Occultism 74.
Virtue and wisdom are sublime things, but if they create pride and a
consciousness
of separateness from the rest of humanity, they are only the snakes of
self
reappearing in a finer form.
Obituary
- Ton den Hartog
As most of you know, Ton den Hartog
was responsible for putting the
Collected
Writings of HPB online. Not having heard
from him recently,
I wrote a few days ago. His parents responded with the
saddening news
than Ton passed beyond on 21 September.
Nicholas Weeks
California Fires burn
theosophical archives
Ken Small
reports on the website of Point Loma Publications, an independent
theosophical publishing house, that their archives have suffered major
losses in the recent fires in California - specifically San Diego. In
response they are starting an effort to digitalize the remaining
material. Please consider helping them. Here's the complete message on
the Point Loma
Publications Website:
I have very
unfortunate news. The recent fire consumed virtually all of PLP's back
inventory (95% of its published in print books)
and 85% of the library, etc. (Some
books and all the archive of photos and art work are safe and some
archive originals at another location.) Additionally a
complete copy of
the archive was made about 6 years ago, but much original material was
lost. A complete
overview of the loss will be accomplished during the next 1-2
weeks. The
fire storm came through at 1000 degrees+ so everything burned from the
inside out with near 100 mph winds according to the fire department
Sunday night October 21. This fire burned around 80,000 acres
during
last week in San Diego County. A second fire burned almost 200,000
acres in the north part of the county.
Such
is the impermanent nature of things, and though the
wisdom lives
on,
there is the importance and necessity of safeguarding and
maintaining for future generations the literature of the
Theosophical
Movement in an accessible way as well. To that end we are
initiating
with the cooperation of Theosophical friends and groups in the US and
Europe a project to digitally scan the entire Point Loma
Theosophical literary heritage. Those interested in more
information about this or contributing to its support may contact us at
info@....
Direct financial contributions may be made via paypal (CLICK
HERE). (Donations are tax deductible.) As
this project develops we will also be re-building the library
and
collaborating with others in establishing long term
centers in
different location(s) for Theosophical study, research and
practice.
Maya or illusion is an element which enters into all finite things, for
everything that exists has only a relative, not an absolute, reality,
since
the appearance which the hidden noumenon assumes for any observer
depends
upon his power of cognition. To the untrained eye of the
savage, a
painting is at first an unmeaning confusion of streaks and daubs of
colour,
while an educated eye sees instantly a face or a landscape.
Nothing
is permanent except the one hidden absolute existence which contains in
itself
the noumena of all realities. The existences belonging to
every plane
of being, up to the highest Dhyan-Chohans, are, in degree, of the
nature
of shadows cast by a magic lantern on a colourless screen; but all
things
are relatively real, for the cogniser is also a reflection, and the
things
cognised are therefore as real to him as himself. Whatever
reality
things possess must be looked for in them before or after they have
passed
like a flash through the material world; but we cannot cognise any such
existence
directly, so long as we have sense-instruments which bring only
material
existence into the field of our consciousness. Whatever plane
our consciousness may be acting in, both we and the things belonging to
that plane are, for the time being, our only realities. As we
rise in the scale of development we perceive that during the stages
through which we have passed we mistook shadows for realities, and the
upward progress of the Ego is a series of progressive
awakenings, each advance bringing with it the idea that now, at last,
we
have reached “reality;” but only when we shall have reached the
absolute
Consciousness, and blended our own with it, shall we be free from the
delusions
produced by Maya.
Theologians proclaim that the whole Bible is the inspired word
of God
and an infallible guide for Christian conduct.
Such teachings become quite difficult to accept however, when
one reads
in the Old Testament such statements as God's command to
Saul: "Thus
saith the Lord of hosts . . . now go and smite Amalek, and utterly
destroy
all that they have, and spare them not, but slay both man and woman,
infant
and suckling, ox and sheep, camel and ass" ( I Samuel
15:3.)
And again, (in Jeremiah 13:14): "And I will dash them one against the
other,
even the fathers and the sons together, said the Lord; I will
not pity,
nor spare, nor have mercy, but destroy them." - hardly the words of a
benevolent
God.
In an effort to find a way out of the dilemma and to explain
away the
obvious contradiction, the theory of "progressive revelation" has been
put
forth. That is to say, inquirers are told that the Bible is a record of
man's
gradually changing and developing ideas concerning the nature of God.
If that be the true explanation, it is equivalent to stating
that large
portions of the Bible were not divinely inspired at all but were
written
by ignorant, cruel and semi-barbarous humans who did not understand the
truth.
If the theologians are correct in what they claim, large
portions of the
Old Testament ought to be scrapped as quickly as possible. Or, assuming
the
theory of progressive revelation to be correct, the teaching of the
Bible
ought to be accompanied by a clear explanation that large portions of
it
must on no account be considered as being the word of God but only as a
collection
of man's crude ideas concerning God.
It is significant to note that in spite of the theologians'
claims concerning
progressive revelation, the Bible continues to be taught in our Sunday
Schools
and churches as being divinely inspired from cover to cover. It is only
when
our religious leaders are forced into a corner, so to speak, that they
resort
to the theory of progressive revelation. Then, when the pressure is
removed,
almost invariably they spring back to their original contention that
the
whole Bible is the inspired word of God.
What would we think of a medical college where the students
were required
to study from a textbook, two-thirds of which advocated such medieval
medical
practices as burning holes in the patient with red hot irons to let out
the
evil spirits, administering portions of powdered skulls as a remedy for
fever,
and so on? Then, towards the end of the book the best and most modern
methods
of treatment would be described, but with nothing to indicate that all
the
teachings in the book were not equally valid. Then, when thoughtful
students
objected to swallowing it all blindly, the professor would explain:
"Well,
you see, it is progressive revelation."
Actually, the Bible was not dictated for us by God, neither is
it the
work of semi-barbarous men. It is a collection of the
teachings of
men who lived in ancient times, men who attained to the most exalted
wisdom
in spiritual affairs and who have passed on their knowledge to us in
the
form of allegories, which serve as containers for sublime truth.
The error of the Christian church for the past sixteen
centuries has been
in mistaking these allegories for literal history and thus turning
large
portions of the Bible into fantastic nonsense.
When the true esoteric interpretation of the Bible is restored
to its
rightful place in our churches and Sunday Schools, there will be no
need
to resort to the theory of "progressive revelation" - that alibi for
misunderstanding.
Previous
issues of Lucifer7 can be found at the online index of
Lucifer7
H.P. Blavatsky, Letter to the Second American Convention, 1888, C.W.
IX, p. 243-44
Orthodoxy in Theosophy is a thing neither possible nor desirable. It is
diversity of opinion, within certain limits, that keeps the Theosophical
Society a living and a healthy body, its many other ugly features notwithstanding.
Were it not, also, for the existence of a large amount of uncertainty in
the minds of students of Theosophy, such healthy divergences would be impossible,
and the Society would degenerate into a sect, in which a narrow and stereotyped
creed would take the place of the living and breathing spirit of Truth
and an ever growing Knowledge.
When the whole of one's outer nature becomes a manifestation of the inner,
spiritual man, the truth as well as the beauty that was latent in him will
shine out through every action, every movement of thought and feeling and
every relationship in his life.
Paul Brunton, The Secret Path, Chapter IV
The only way to understand the meaning of meditation is to practice it.
Leonardo da Vinci
As a well-spent day brings happy sleep, so life well-used brings happy death.
Church of England people who attend church regularly declare their belief constantly in the Communion of the Saints but if you ask them to explain what
they mean by it they will probably refer you to their rector, or to the curate
if you are not socially prominent. Any such reference is not likely to bring
much light, if indeed you are not reproved for an exhibition of morbid curiosity.
The saints according to the New Testament are full members of the Church who have made some progress in acquiring the Christian virtues, and perhaps in developing some of the gifts or powers enumerated by St. Paul in I Corinthians xii. New Testament Christianity implies in those who profess it some degree of communion or relationship with what is technically known as the Holy Ghost, which is really the Christos consciousness, recognized by some as intuition, but more definitely available than what is known by this term, and actually and reliably useful to speakers and writers. Jesus warned his apostles not to worry about what they should say as the Holy Ghost would supply them with words. A Roman Catholic preacher recently said that the promptings of the Holy Ghost did not interfere with the free will of the person affected, who could use his judgment in selecting or rejecting what came to him. It thus depends upon the sensitiveness and the intelligence of the speaker or writer how he will interpret or present what he is given. To put it in another way the consciousness of the Holy Ghost is an extension of the ordinary consciousness to a higher or deeper level than that on which the ordinary mind functions.
It will be understood, then, that like all our consciousness, it is from within that we gain access to it. Heaven is a most deceiving word for the ordinary man, for he thinks of it as a place or sphere away off in space somewhere, while it is always with him, within. Jesus is reported to have said that the Kingdom of heaven is within you. "Inside you," is the meaning of the Greek word entos. St. Paul says - "Jesus Christ is in you." (II Cor. xiii. 5). For the mysteries of life and their solution we must
look within.
The Church has constantly drilled its members from childhood onwards to think of "Heaven", as up in the sky away off in space somewhere instead of in their own hearts and consciousness. Hence the difficulty of understanding as St. John tells us that God is Love, God is Light, God is Spirit, that is,
Life or Breath. If these principles are within us they may be identified and become familiar. We know what Love is, but how often do we think of it as God? We know what Life is, but do we make a rule of thinking that we share it with God? So also with Light, which is intelligence or knowledge or recognition in its various forms.
When we lose our friends in what we call death we should not associate them with their dead bodies or the graveyard. "He is not here; he is risen," is a lucid instruction. If instead of meditating among the tombs, like so many, we resolved before we slept each night, to prepare ourselves for communion with the saints, our dear ones, our "lost" ones, our spiritual pastors and Masters, how joyfully we would arise every morning with hearts full of blessing, with minds enriched and solaced and strengthened with the thoughts, even the words, and with that strange and happy awareness, not of
the "coming", but of the "presence" of the blessed Ones of the Kingdom.
This is the transcript of an
actual radio conversation of a US naval ship with Canadian authorities
off the coast of Newfoundland in October, 1995.
Radio conversation released by the Chief of Naval Operations on November 10, 1995.
Americans: Please divert your course 15 degrees to the North to avoid a collision.
Canadians: Recommend you divert YOUR course 15 degrees to the South to avoid a collision.
Americans: This is the Captain of a US Navy ship. I say again, divert YOUR course.
Canadians: No. I say again, you divert YOUR course.
Americans: THIS IS THE AIRCRAFT CARRIER USS LINCOLN, THE SECOND LARGEST
SHIP IN THE UNITED STATES' ATLANTIC FLEET. WE ARE ACCOMPANIED BY THREE
DESTROYERS, THREE CRUISERS, AND NUMEROUS SUPPORT VESSELS. I DEMAND THAT
YOU CHANGE YOUR COURSE 15 DEGREES NORTH, THAT'S ONE FIVE DEGREES NORTH,
OR COUNTER-MEASURES WILL BE UNDERTAKEN TO ENSURE THE SAFETY OF THIS
SHIP.
Canadians: This is a lighthouse. Your call.
Previous
issues of Lucifer7 can be found at the online index of
Lucifer7
New
on Katinka Hesselink Net Burma: online
petition Short Quotes The Ideal and the Actual,
Iverson L. Harris King James bible.
The Second General Epistle of Peter; Chapter 1 A mental
problem...
News in Australia, Canada, UK and
many other countries, have in the first page the comments of Stallone:
“Sylvester
Stallone has revealed he and the film crew from his Rambo sequel
witnessed atrocities while filming along the Burmese border.
"I
witnessed the aftermath - survivors with legs cut off and all kinds of
land mine injuries, maggot-infested wounds and ears cut off. We saw
many elephants with blown off legs. We hear about Vietnam and Cambodia
and this was more horrific," Stallone said in a telephone interview.
He
returned eight days ago from shooting John Rambo, the fourth film in
the action series, on the Salween River separating Thailand and Burma.
He said it was "a hellhole beyond your wildest dreams".
The
scenes he described occurred before the crackdown against large
pro-democracy protests when soldiers responded by opening fire with
automatic weapons on unarmed demonstrators.
For
decades, Burma's
army has waged a war against ethnic groups in which soldiers have razed
villages, raped women and killed civilians.
"Stallone's
next challenge is trying to get an "R" rating from the MPAA. "This
is full scale genocide. I want an 'R' and I want the violence in there
because it is reality. It would be a whitewashing not to show what's
over there,'' he told Associated Press."I think there is a story that
needs to be told," Stallone said."
"Soldiers
responded last week by shooting at unarmed demonstrators. The
government says 10 people were killed, but dissident groups say
anywhere from several dozen to as many as 200 died in the crackdown.
Dissident groups say up to 200 protesters were slain and 6,000 detained
in the junta's crackdown, compared to the regime's report of 10
deaths..."
The Top news in the first page of yahoo
is about the Giant Snakes a reporter saw, in a Chinese lake... no
comments....
http://www.yahoo.com/
The
UN expected Gambari, to solve diplomatically the problem. That is
ridiculous and obvious Gambari, who waited days and days to be received
by the government in Burma, would not have any possibility to have a
positive result.
Is
this an inversion of values or what? Of course any group must fight for
their rights, and any religion to defend their principles. But what
shocks me most, is the great indifference for what is happening in
Burma. Such indifference from part of the
authorities is
barbarian. The worker of a hospital in Burma called the owner
of
a web site in tears, saying that they were removing injured monks from
the hospital, and incinerating them still alive!!!!!".
The
United Nations have the following agreement:
Convention
on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide Adopted
by Resolution 260 (III) A of the U.N. General Assembly on 9 December
1948. Entry into force: 12 January 1951.
Article
III: The following acts shall be punishable:
(a)
Genocide; (b) Conspiracy to commit genocide; (c)
Direct and public incitement to commit genocide; (d) Attempt
to commit genocide; (e) Complicity in genocide.
Article
IV: Persons committing genocide or any of the other acts enumerated in
article III shall be punished, whether they are constitutionally
responsible rulers, public officials or private individuals.
Article
V: The Contracting Parties undertake to enact, in accordance with their
respective Constitutions, the necessary legislation to give effect to
the provisions of the present Convention, and, in particular, to
provide effective penalties for persons guilty of genocide or any of
the other acts enumerated in article III.
Article
VI: Persons
charged with genocide or any of the other acts enumerated in article
III shall be tried by a competent tribunal of the State in the
territory of which the act was committed, or by such international
penal tribunal as may have jurisdiction with respect to those
Contracting Parties which shall have accepted its jurisdiction.
Unfortunately
the UN can be considered the major responsible, for the continuing
state of terror and chaos that exist in Burma. Is Burma eventually
going to have the same end Tibet did? For as it seems China supports
the dictator leader of Burma. Consequently its obvious that
no
military interference will happen from the UN in Burma, is obvious that
the monks and the people will continually be living in a state of
terror, its obvious that many more will die, their bodies left in the
middle of the jungle or incinerated, that many more will be beaten to
death, tortured, etc. Burma is not USA or Israel so why the authorities
would take any immediate action?
The point is we
as persons,
who are deeply shocked with what is happening there, what can we do? To
raise our voice, sign the petitions, denounce the indifference and
criticize it, just do not remain silent in front of such crime.
Erica
Letzerich Georgiadis (reprinted from a private e-mail with permission)
Short Quotes
Talbot Mundy, Queen Cleopatra
"We recognize a
kindred spirit, or a greater spirit, neither by eye nor by ear, but by
the heart, which sees by flashes of the Light within ourselves."
"But as it is an inexorable law, that the ground must be tilled if the
harvest is to be reaped, so Theosophists are obliged to work in the
world
unceasingly and very often in doing this to make serious mistakes...
Yet
it is an absolute fact that without good works the spirit of
brotherhood
would die in the world; and this can never be. Therefore is the double
activity,
of learning and doing most necessary; we have to do good, and we have
to
do it rightly, with knowledge." (Let Every Man Prove His Own
Work,
H. P. Blavatsky)
Paul Brunton, The Secret Path, Chapter IV
The treasure-trove of the real self is within us, but it can be lifted
only
when the mind is still.
St. Paul
has written one of the very great texts of the Bible in the words: "The
things that are seen are
temporal; the things that are unseen are
eternal." This is true for
religion, but also for philosophy, and for science as well.
The kingdom of heaven is within you, invisible,
uncreate. No man can reveal his heaven
to his brother; it is an apocalyptic
vision for his self alone. Know ye not,
says St. Paul again, that Jesus Christ is in you? Closer than
breathing, nearer than hands and
feet, is the assurance of Tennyson who had the vision splendid if any
man ever
had.
The Ideal and the Actual
Iverson L.
Harris, Theosophical Forum, October, 1937
The most
vital teachings of religion, philosophy, and science, are those which
throw light on human relationships - family, community, nation and
humanity; in other words, on life as it is on earth, here and now, in
all
its phases, physical, mental, and spiritual. There is a perpetual ebb
and
flow between emphasis on the ideal and emphasis on the actual -
represented
in ancient China by Lao-Tse and Confucius, in Greece by Plato and
Aristotle,
at the dawn of Christianity by Christ and Ceasar, and in the Nineteenth
Century
possibly by Blavatsky and Darwin.
When the ideal is
divorced from the actual, it becomes at best quixotic or sentimental,
and at worst fantastic, superstitious, or fanatic. It is
then rightly branded as 'the opiate of the people'; for, instead of
giving
men the spiritual elixir of an awakened mind, which brings 'the peace
that
passeth all understanding', it puts them to sleep with the soporifics
of
blind faith, emotionalism, or credulity. On the other hand, when the
actual
turns its back on the ideal it degenerates into sordid selfishness - a
poisonous
bootleg that drives men mad.
The woods are full of
both kinds of addicts at the present time - on the one hand, people
drugged with the opiates of dogmatism or fantastic pseudo-mysticism,
and on the other hand, people mad with the moonshine of unilluminated
theories and half-truths about economics and politics. It is part of
the mission
of Theosophy to teach men to follow 'The Middle Way' pointed
out by
the Buddha and the Christ - 'to render unto Caesar those things which
are
Caesar's and to render unto God those things which are God's.'
All men may be divided or they daily and hourly divide
themselves into two classes: those who think and those who merely
react. Few of us are wise enough always to enroll with the thinkers;
few are so far divorced from
the human thinking principle innate in all of us that we never do any
thinking for ourselves at all. But those who keep always in touch with
actuality
and yet ever use their divine power of thought and reason in striving
towards the ideal, are the salt of the earth. They are on their way to
becoming
the Philosopher-Kings of who Plato wrote in his Republic.
Those
who merely react to the impact of their environment and the stimuli of
their personal desires and animal propensities are they who will always
have to be regimented; and it is they who make necessary the endless
series of laws and rules and regulations which so afflict our modern
world. The
mass of mankind will always be forcing upon themselves additional
restrictions of their liberties, in order to prevent them from injuring
their neighbors. But the wise man is truly free, because his desires
are few and the world that he lives in is limited only by the scope of
his own thoughts. The greatest minds of all ages are his confreres and
his home is the Universe. In the
words of Vergil:
Felix qui
potuit rerum cognoscere causas, Quique metus omnes, et
inexorabile fatum, Subjecit pedibus, strepitumque Acherontis
avari -
"Happy the man who has learned the causes
of things, and has put under his feet all fears, and inexorable fate,
and the noisy strife of the hell of greed."
King James
bible. The Second General Epistle of Peter; Chapter 1
1:5 And beside this, giving all diligence, add to your faith virtue;
and to virtue knowledge;
1:6 And to knowledge temperance; and to temperance patience; and to
patience godliness;
1:7 And to godliness brotherly kindness; and to brotherly kindness
charity.
1:8 For if these things be in you, and abound, they make you
that ye shall neither be barren nor unfruitful in the knowledge of our
Lord Jesus Christ.
It
doesn't hurt to take a hard look at yourself from time to time, and
this should help get you started. During a visit to the mental asylum,
a visitor asked the Director what the criterion was which defined
whether or not a patient should be institutionalized.
"Well,"
said the Director, "we fill up a bathtub, then we offer a teaspoon, a
teacup and a bucket to the patient and ask him or her to empty the
bathtub."
"Oh, I understand," said the visitor. " A
normal person would use the bucket because it's bigger than the spoon
or the teacup."
"No." said the Director, "A normal
person would pull the plug. Do you want a bed near the window?"
Previous
issues of Lucifer7 can be found at the online index of
Lucifer7
New on Katinka Hesselink Net Religious News
Short Quotes Truth - Notes From Orpheus Lodge Meeting
Asceticism, H.S. Olcott News: Religious intolerance (China, Egypt and The Netherlands) Healing - The English Summer school July 2007
Exclusive
interview with Michael Gomes: things you always wanted to know and even
a scoop. For those who don't know Michael Gomes: he's the most
knowledgeable theosophical historian inside the Theosophical Society
and an inspiring theosophical teacher. The interview was taken during
the English Theosophical Summer School at Oadby. I expect to have it
online before the next issue of Lucifer7.
I've
been working on putting online those issues of the Canadian Theosophist
that Jake Jaqua digitalized. For the occasion I will also put up a new
central page where all material related to theosophy on my website is
referenced.
The librarian of the English TS headquarters in London, Barry Thompson, gave a lecture on Tibetan Buddhism, the after death states and the Mahatma Letters.
I thought the material he presented relating to the after death states
in the Mahatma Letters was so good that I'm working with Barry Thompson
on putting that material online. I hope to have it online before the
next issue of Lucifer7.
Strength of purpose has no part in obstinacy. Obstinacy clings to what it sees, denying what it sees not. Strength of purpose, daughter of imagination, can deny what seems to be, because it knows what is. Men speak to one another of protection, but what do they mean by it? I myself have treated many a
wound that might have been a mere scratch had its victim not worn armor. And the medicines of many a physician are a deadlier preventive of recovery than a disease itself. If a man's own soul protect him not, where shall he look for safety from the multitudes of dangers that beset him on every side? But if he hide within the glory of his own soul, how shall any dark destroyer find him?"
Heart of Rama, Lucknow. (Canadian Theosophist, 1935)
The greatest mistake made by present day Socialists, is that they envy
the drop of sea-spray possessed by the so-called wealthy, instead, of pitying
their burden.
N. Sri Ram, Thoughts For Aspirants, Second Series
When there is no gap between the knower and the known, between the subject that perceives and experiences, and its object, there is knowledge by identity, absolute and direct.
Spiritual Monopolies, Canadian Theosophist, Volume 24, #1 (1943)
It should not surprise us, in this age of business monopolies, that the
commercial world, the world of affairs, the only world of which many people
have any consciousness, that the general habit of mind should be extended
to the world of religion, so that the Christian Church members act as though
they had patent rights on Jesus, the Buddhists of some stripes wish to claim
the world for Buddha, the Mahometans [Muslims] hold their territory as sole agents
for The Prophet, and the Brahmins also claim exclusive privileges. Of course
it is little men who assert these rights, which, after all, only become tangible
in the collection of royalties.
Truth - Notes From Orpheus Lodge Meeting, September, 1922
Canadian Theosophist, Volume 26, #11 (1946)
The ordeal of discriminating Truth from untruth devolves upon those who
accept Theosophy, whether as individuals or as a body. It is this ordeal
which the T.S. as a body has failed in, together with most of its members
as individuals. In order to sustain successfully this ordeal two things
are essential. A deep and exacting Sincerity, - an inner honesty so
drastic and of such long life that it has become second nature, - and Intelligence.
This power of Intelligence implies the ability to bring the impartial critical
rationalistic faculty to bear coupled with Intuition, a Spiritual faculty
existing as more than a germ in only the very few. It is through the
passing of this ordeal that this Spiritual faculty of divining Truth is born.
Theosophical teachings are chiefly of value to the sincere Seeker for
Truth, for whom the main objective is Spiritual regeneration. From
the application of its principles he may evolve a science of wise living
which each individual can apply in his own life at the place in the scale
of being at which he finds himself. A wide knowledge of the basic principles
of Theosophy and of their practical application in the life of the individual
is by far the greatest need in the world today.
"Nobody even dreams how hard is the task of self-conquest, the subjugation of passion and appetite, the liberation of the flesh-prisoned Higher Self, until he has tried. Every such struggle is a tragedy, full of the most painful interest, and provocation of sympathy in the hearts of "good men and angels". That is what Jesus meant when he said there was more joy in heaven over one sinner that repented than over ninety and nine just men that needed no repentance. And yet how bitterly uncharitable is the world- the world of concealed sinners and respectable, undetected hypocrites, usually- over the failure of a poor soul to scale the spiritual mountains in consequence of lack of reserved power of will at a critical moment. How these undetected ones patronizingly condemn the vanquished, who at least have done what many of them have not, made a brave fight for the divine prize. How they strut about in fancied impregnability, like the street-praying Pharisee of Jerusalem, thanking fortune that their private sins are still hidden, and redoubling their prayers, postures, canting moralities, and asceticism in diet, to deceive their neighbour and themselves!
And the devil did grin, for his darling sin
Is pride that apes humility.
Shakespeare made a man like that say:
And thus I clothe my villainy with old odd ends, stol'n out of holy writ, and seem a saint when most I play the devil"
"I got a stinging reproach once in Bombay from a Master, when I hesitated to admit to membership an earnest man who had been persecuted, even sent to prison, by Christian bigots, on a pretext. I was bidden to look through my whole body of colleagues and see how, despite their wealth of good intention, nine-tenths of them were secret sinners through weak moral fibres. It was a life lesson to me, and ever since then I have abstained from thinking the worse of my associates, many no weaker or more imperfect than myself, who if they could not climb the mountain were at least, like myself, earnestly struggling and stumbling onward. Years ago- when we first came to Bombay,- I was told by H.P.B. that several of the Mahatmas, being met together, cause to drift by them in the astral light the psychical reflections of the then Indian members of the Theosophical Society. She asked me to guess which one's image was brightest. I mentioned a young Parsi of Bombay, then a pre-eminently active and devoted member. She said, laughing, that on the contrary he was not bright at all, the morally brightest being a poor Bengali gentleman who had become a drunkard. The Parsi afterwards deserted us and became an active opponent, the Bengali reformed and is now a pious ascetic! She explained then that many vicious habits and sensual gratifications often affect the physical self, without leaving deep permanent scars on the inner-self. In such cases the spiritual nature is so vigorous as to throw off these external blotches after a brief struggle."
"But if encouraged and persisted in, evil habits at last overcome the soul's resisting power, and the whole man becomes corrupted. Some tantrikas, Indian and European, have preached the accursed doctrine that the occult postulant can best kill out desire by gratifying and exhausting it. To deliberately gratify lust, or pride, or avarice, or ambition, or hatred, or anger- all equally perilous to the psychic- is quite another matter from falling now and then, through no pre-arrangement and simply because of moral weakness in a particular crisis, into one of those sins. From the latter, recovery is always possible, and may be comparatively easy where the average moral fibre is strong; but deliberate vicious indulgence leads inevitably to moral degradation and a fall into the depths."
News: Religious intolerance (China, Egypt and The Netherlands)
This
is one of those months when too much happens. Some of the things I will
cover below are so out there, that I have had doubts about whether it
should be covered at all. But I guess it has to, since religious
intolerance is growing all over the world. Religions represent a lot of
what people hold dear: their identities, their dreams, their hopes,
their fears.
In Egypt one has to give one's religion when
applying for documents like birth certificates and passports. Only
three religions are allowed: Muslim, Christian and Jew. Legally, people
who aren't one of those religions don't exist. The Dutch newspaper that
covered this story, focused mainly on the Baha'i. On the old
handwritten documents papers, government workers would sometimes just
leave open the 'religion' field. With electronically generated identity
cards becoming mandatory, Baha'i's are left with quite a quandary. The
default way to fill in the form means being registered as Muslim. But
if fundamentalist Muslims find that out, they feel the right to assault
people for being untrue to their faith (the Islam). Living without an
identity cards leaves kids without education, vaccination and parents
without the ability to buy a house.
Over to China. The Chinese Government has once again shown that it
isn't interested in freedom of religion by stating that Tibetan monks
can only reincarnate with permission of the government. The political
aspect of this is clearly that they want a say in who will be seen as
the next Dalai Lama.
Then
The Netherlands. Given our constitutional freedom of religion, and the
general trust with which the Dutch still regard their government (well,
relatively speaking that is) - the following story is more like a comic
interlude, but a very sad one. The current most vocal proponent of
anti-Islam views in the Netherlands is Geert Wilders. He recently made
international headlines in a way that made me think he had lost his
mind. He wants to ban the Quran. There is only one banned book in the
Netherlands: 'Mein Kampf' by Adolf Hitler. According to Wilders the
Quran is as bad as that. He also wants to change the constitution, to
get rid of the freedom of religion. Banning the Quran would have that
effect also. If Mosques can't carry the Quran, Muslims are effectively
banned from exercising their weekly prayers. To change the constitution
the parliament would have to get a very large majority in favour of
this. There isn't a majority at all, so the Dutch news reports today. Most parties believe
in freedom of religion and changing the constitution like
this would go against all kinds of international and EU laws.
Theosophists
have stood for freedom of religion from the time Olcott and Blavatsky
landed in India. Olcott in particular fought for freedom of religion
for the Buddhists in Ceylon. He made sure they could marry according to
their own faiths, have their own Buddhist schools and Buddhist
religious holidays. All this when Ceylon (currently Sri Lanka) was
still part of the British Empire. The Quran doesn't contain more
politically incorrect material than the Bible does, so banning that
book would open the door to banning all kinds of things that are dear
to some and offensive to others. Religions cannot be forced on people.
Conversion is a very personal process that governments should not
interfere with unless the general good is at stake. Governments need to
make sure that Muslim terrorism doesn't grow, but they should not
alienate Muslims in general. Most Muslims are just ordinary people
with jobs, kids and mortgages. The same is true for Tibetan Lama's, and
Baha'i's, and people of other religions. As long as criminal law isn't
broken, governments should stay out of people's right to decide for
themselves what to believe and how to live.
I
have just returned from the English Summer school of the Theosophical
Society Adyar at Leicester University Grounds. The Highpoint of the
week was Michael Gomes in the Blavatsky Lecture. There were a hundred
people there, which is not at all bad for a theosophical lecturer.
Michael Gomes is turning into quite the theosophical celebrity. He's
very good on the stage, keeping us awake and entertained. He's also
well grounded in theosophical history which is what this lecture was
about, as well as in practical theosophy: the subject of his public
lecture on Wednesday. It has to be said: he did a superb job in his
Blavatsky lecture on Olcott and Healing. It had material on healing in
the 19th century that I haven't seen before and on Olcott's
earlier interests in the subject. Much of it was the result of looking
up the references to books on healing that Olcott referenced in his Old
Diary Leaves - something most people would never even dream of doing.
The workshops he did in the second half of the week were the best
attended with I think 50 people there the time he did a walking
meditation. Quite a sight: 50 people walking slowly in a line from the
lecture-building snaking their way to the lovely park. I didn't attend
that workshop, but didn't hear too many complaints.
The
week was very full with lectures that struck me and a few that
frankly didn't do much for me. For this review I'll just ignore the
latter, because the whole thing was good mainly because of the variety.
As for workshops - there were too many to mention (which was great, but
I obviously didn't attend all of them). There was (hatha) yoga in the
mornings, yoga nidra and pranayama yoga. I did the hatha yoga and the
pranayama yoga - which was weird because this week I somehow developed
a difficulty in breathing during this sort of exercise. I'm pretty sure
it was me, not the exercises. There were workshops on kinesiology,
reflexology, shiatsu and Edgar Cayce remedies. I attended the
kinesiology and got diagnosed with a B-complex deficiency. Dana
Eaton gave me a B-vitamin shot through no physical means. Not being
sure she was successful, I decided to
make sure I got enough yogurt during the means of the rest of the week.
In the reflexology workshop we did a massage of each other's feet and I
slept very well that night. Reflexology is to do with massaging the
feet and through the meridians
there diagnosing and treating problems in the upper body.
During
the study groups I chose to attend the 'astrology for the 21st century'
workshop with Ted Capstick. He's a very good esoteric astrologer. This
means that he's into the astrology that has been developed from the
work of Alice Bailey. People were impressed with the accuracy of his
reading of their lives from reading their charts. He looked at people's
charts for free and even did progressions to look at present and future
problems. He hardly had a moment to himself all week. It all looked to
me to be very useful to the people who did get their chart done. Being (as I thought at the time)
at a relatively calm period in my life myself, I didn't take the
opportunity - perhaps I should have...
Professor Ram Gokal lectured on the general
theme of spirituality and health. His main point was that our thoughts
influence our health and that we have to take responsibility for our
health. He went into the law of attraction and is clearly influenced by
what is currently referred to as 'the secret'. He drew quite a
crowd on Monday morning and his workshop on pranayama yoga was well
attended. For me personally his lecture was a stark contrast to the
informal talk a few of us heard on Tibetan Healing on Tuesday. In that
workshop the power of the mind was also stressed, but the conclusion
was mainly that we need to work on ourselves to get rid of anger,
desire and closed minds. On Monday evening there was a slide show on
the work Dr. Trevor Ford had done in the Grand Canyon researching old
stone layers visible there. Robert Woolley did a presentation on
Tuesday on Sacred Gardens as Therapy. He showed us his own experiments
in the area of creating a sacred garden using symbolism in the design.
The result obviously had more to do with getting to know the energies
and healing one's spirit, rather than one's body.
One of
the highlights for me personally was the lecture Barry Thompson, the
librarian of the London headquarters and one of the younger members,
gave on the Tibetan Book of the Dead. He contrasted the work by
Blavatsky on the after death states with that done by C.W. Leadbeater.
Then he went on to look at the Tibetan Book of the Dead. I hope to
publish more on that on my website - stay tuned. When most people were
attending the workshop by Michael Gomes, I went to the one by Hugh
Agnew. He had a whole folder prepared for us and as we discussed
various themes we went back and forth reading his prepared quotes -
which included material that he wrote himself as well as spiritual
stories, Blavatsky quotes and more. We were a small group, but the
conversations were very good and some of the material Hugh collected
will come back on this website in one form or another.
On
Thursday Susan Bayliss gave a talk on 'The Healing Power of Thought'.
It was mainly a summing up of some of the healing methods she uses
herself, like stones. The best part were the paintings she had made of
her own observations of the aura. Most of it was old stuff for people
familiar with the work by C.W. Leadbeater, but it was good to see how
real it all was to her. I was struck with her picture of the result on
the deeper planes of negative thoughts. She showed what she saw when
someone a friend of hers had a quarrel with someone else. That someone
was outside in the car and Susan saw black and red arrows go to her
friend and later found out that they had in fact been quarreling. To me
it was a good reminder of the fact that our thoughts, especially when
charged with emotion, can have tremendous effect on people - whether
present or not.
Thursday night I was part of a play that
Alan Hughes had created for the school on The Wonderful Story of the
Mahatma Letters. I played Patience Sinnett and had the closing lines.
Colyn Price played my husband: A.P. Sinnett. Michael Gomes was A.O.
Hume and Cornelia Price was A.P. Blavatsky. It was good fun.
On
Friday Chaganti V.K. Maithreya, for whom this was the last lecture in a
series, showed us a video on the TOS work after the Tsunami in
India. His lecture accompanying that was mainly on the importance of
yama and niyama (good behavior mainly) for yoga.
I think
all present will agree that we had a great week. The atmosphere was
happy, even playful, because Michael Gomes joked with everyone he met.
This set the tone of the whole summer school. The program had
something for everybody - and because there was also practical work
(workshops) our minds didn't come out quite as overloaded as they
usually do after a theosophical school. There was not just a good
balance between practical and theoretical, but also a good balance
between Blavatskyan theosophy and other lines of spirituality. This
school showed, in my opinion, how good a theosophical week can be.
There is tremendous potential for inspiration and learning in the
combination of various perspectives. That potential certainly came out
in this school.
Previous
issues of Lucifer7 can be found at the online index of
Lucifer7
Life is after all the great teacher. We return to study it, after we have
acquired power over it, just as the master in chemistry learns more in the
laboratory than his pupil does. There are persons so near the door of knowledge
that life itself prepares them for it, and no individual hand has to invoke
the hideous guardian of the entrance. These must naturally be keen and powerful
organizations, capable of the most vivid pleasure; then pain comes and fills
its great duty. The most intense forms of suffering fall on such a nature,
till at last it arouses from its stupor of consciousness, and by the force
of its internal vitality steps over the threshold into a place of peace.
Adi Granth
"Thou art in the tree, Thou art in its leaves.
Thou art space, Thou art time,
Thou art fasting, Thou art wisdom,
Thou alone art, Thou alone art."
Mr. D.S. Sarma, The Gita and Spiritual Life
"The technical yoga-sastra clearly tells us that the so-called siddhi are
obstacles, rather than helps, in the way of a yogin, and that true samadhi
or realization is only for him who brushes aside the supernormal powers,
and marches onward. It is to be observed that a decadent yogin, who
possesses, or pretends he possesses, these powers, is generally characterized
by spiritual vanity and an intolerable self-importance. He thinks that
by his renunciation of the world he is entitled to the respect of the world
. . . . The truly holy man is he who has surrendered not only his belongings,
but also the longings of his self. Every religion recognizes that spiritual
pride is the deadliest of sins. And yet it is the trap into which many
a religious man falls. It seems to be the tragedy of religion everywhere
that those who profess to be religious and have the holy name of God on their
lips are often less humane, less unselfish and less charitable than those
who are indifferent to religion and never think of God."
Revelation, ii. 23. Moffatt translation.
"I am the searcher of the inmost heart; I will requite each of you
according to what you have done."
Mr. D.S. Sarma, The Gita and Spiritual Life
"The technical yoga-sastra clearly tells us that the so-called siddhi are obstacles, rather than helps, in the way of a yogin, and that true samadhi or realization is only for him who brushes aside the supernormal powers, and
marches onward. It is to be observed that a decadent yogin, who possesses,
or pretends he possesses, these powers, is generally characterized by spiritual
vanity and an intolerable self-importance. He thinks that by his renunciation
of the world he is entitled to the respect of the world . . . . The truly
holy man is he who has surrendered not only his belongings, but also the
longings of his self. Every religion recognizes that spiritual pride
is the deadliest of sins. And yet it is the trap into which many a
religious man falls. It seems to be the tragedy of religion everywhere that those who profess to be religious and have the holy name of God on their lips are often less humane, less unselfish and less charitable than those who are indifferent to religion and never think of God."
Editorial - Harry Potter
Like millions of others worldwide I've
read the latest Harry Potter: "Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows"
and am glad to report that the power of love is stressed in numerous
ways in this book. The three objects of the Theosophical Society
include first and foremost a brotherhood in which caste, background,
gender and colour are disregarded. This book shows in highly dramatic
fashion just how powerful such working together can be.
Must Find Real Causes
Canadian Theosophist, April 15th, 1926
Investigation that will redirect educational processes was urged on the Religious Education Association at the convention held in Toronto in mid-March by Dr. Goodwin B. Watson, of Columbia University. He told the final session of the convention bluntly that much of the present talk and planning was futile until research had discovered the real causes of desirable and undesirable attitudes towards other races and creeds.
From his experience as instructor in educational psychology at Teachers' College, New York, Dr. Watson said that character and good-will did not produce,
but rather were effects of attitudes. World-mindedness was not traceable
to inborn intelligence and only partially to right information. The
causes of deeper attitudes were obscure, and attitudes, he said, were extremely
difficult to alter, hence a pressing need for investigation before the force
of religious education were loosed too far in any one direction.
Reporting on the confessions of 500 college students as to the experiences which seemed responsible for their attitudes towards other peoples and nationalities, Dr. Watson listed school experiences, reading material, personal encounters and home attitudes as vital factors in determining attitudes of persons and
groups.
"Bright people may be more or less prejudiced than dull people," said the
speaker, disposing of the contention that brains make for breadth of sympathy
and understanding.
"People who are honest are not necessarily considerate," he said. "People prejudiced about religion may not he prejudiced about the War."
Knowledge, he admitted, did affect feeling, but it had to be well-balanced or antagonism might follow. To learn good about foreigners from a disliked person might have unanticipated effects.
Previous
issues of Lucifer7 can be found at the online index of
Lucifer7
I've
become active on bloglog, an online community for people on the web -
mostly webloggers. I've met a few interesting people there and here are
two of their blogposts:
The road begins in the dull swamp where we live; not on the
mountain top where we are not.
Buddha, Dhammapada, Translation Juan Mascaro
160 Only a man himself can be the master of himself: who else from
the outside could be his master? When the master and servant are one,
then there is true help and self-possession.
Self-reliance implies non-dependence psychologically on anything
external to oneself. Such non-dependence abolishes fear and invests
with a dignity that is wholly natural to him who achieves that
condition.
Paul Brunton, The Inner Reality, Chapter V
We are not here to live for ever, and therefore all mortal
possessions
and earthly glories should be wisely used and wisely understood; they
should
not make us captive.
The
efforts of those members who benefit the Cause should never be impeded
by criticism on the part of others who do nothing, but all should be
encouraged and as much help given as is possible, even if that
assistance be limited through circumstances to mere encouragement.
Every sincere effort for Theosophy will bear good fruit, no matter how
inappropriate it may appear in the eyes of those members who have set
to themselves and everybodyelse only one definite plan of action.
The Nature of Self-Forgetfulness
Leoline L. Wright, The Theosophical Forum, VOL. IX, No. 2, August,
1936
HOW few, even among the thoughtful, ever suspect the real and
intense
happiness which follows upon the determined practice of
self-forgetfulness!
In our wrong-headed civilization the very words have come to signify an
outworn if not impossible ideal. Yet self -forgetfulness actually
results
not only in the power to bless and bestow but in the transmutation of
our
ignorance, unrest, and miseries into knowledge, power, and peace.
For we have the assurance that the wise practice of daily
self-forgetfulness
will bring to us a sacred companionship with the Inner God and set our
feet
upon the pathway to divine adventure in the inner worlds.
There are, however, certain states of mind which might pass for
self-forgetfulness with the unthinking but which are most emphatically
the opposite.
One of these is a practice which has become nearly universal, in this
day
at least, and that is self-evasion. We are all familiar enough in
our
own experience and that of our associates with the itch to escape from
ourselves. And the insane lavishness of this mechanical
civilization pours out the
means: novels, cinemas, auto-trips, 'parties,' the bridge game,
and
a hundred other diversions. Yet most of our amusements are legitimate
enough
when they are intelli-gently used. They are harmful only when
allowed
to become a demanding habit. Even philanthropic work, if
undertaken
as such a soporific, is but another road to self-evasion. It is
motive
that colors the deed and automatically brings about the result.
Service
of others is naturally better for anyone than slavery to amusements,
but
in the case of using it to evade our own problems it is a neglect of
one's
essential duty. It may even result in a worse tangle of our
personal
affairs than before.
Why not say to ourselves when some of our intimate problems torment
us by our inability to solve them: "Well, after all, does it
matter
so much about me? Isn't it the burden of the world that really
matters - the tragedy of crime, the miseries of the poor, seeking
hearts everywhere that cry out for light and help? Here is
Theosophy with its grand
diagnosis, its power of prevention and cure. I will set aside for
a time this trouble of my own heart and see what I can do for the
spreading
of a knowledge of this panacea, acting in the meanwhile also as a good
neighbor,
a sympathetic 'home-fellow and friend.' " When a Theosophist, or
anyone
else for that matter, carries such a thought into action, mysteriously
his
personal problem is likely to begin to solve itself. This happens
often. Nature objects to our constantly pulling the plant up by
the roots to see how it is coming on. But if we trust her with a
divine impersonal
carelessness as to our own well-being, and will work unselfishly for
others,
she will come to make obeisance and work on our side.
Here the motive creates the apparent contradiction and gives to
service that is truly self-forgetful, but never self-evasive, its often
immediate reward. And the further 'rewards' which accrue more
slowly, flow
from the crystal fount of the Cosmic Heart - a beautiful happiness and
a serenity whose harmonies pervade in blessing and help the lives of
all
about us. And some day, suddenly, we ourselves shall awaken to a
new dawn breaking in splendor before our inner vision, and discover
that
our feet are set upon Amrita-Yana, the secret pathway to the gods.
Previous
issues of Lucifer7 can be found at the online index of
Lucifer7