Skip to search.
legality-of-income-tax · We The People - Legality of Income Tax

Group Information

  • Members: 1422
  • Category: Taxes
  • Founded: Jul 8, 1999
  • Language: English
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Real people. Real stories. See how Yahoo! Groups impacts members worldwide.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Messages 32539 - 32568 of 43474   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Messages: Simplify | Expand   (Group by Topic) Author Sort by Date ^
32539 skefboomer2000 Offline Send Email Sep 1, 2005
2:34 pm
Folks: I realize that there are details to be worked out and disagreements, but isn't it time that we determine how to fight the misapplication of the law by...
32540 azfrench
azfrench2001 Offline Send Email
Sep 1, 2005
2:34 pm
See sections 7402 and 7403 of the IRS Code. It is the court that has jurisdiction to render Judgments and orders for the enforcement of the tax law, not the...
32541 Bill Nixon
seacoastbill Offline Send Email
Sep 1, 2005
2:34 pm
Pkmr, You, us, we are fighting against a beast that is huge. They will stop at nothing because the revenue agents receive bonuses, raises, promotions from ...
32542 macwildstar
maczeff Offline Send Email
Sep 1, 2005
2:34 pm
How I create capital without using time? Simple.. I buy YOUR time. And I make YOU work.. and I take the results of YOUR labor, and sell it for a profit. Then I...
32543 Virgil Cooper
contrarianfw21 Offline Send Email
Sep 1, 2005
2:34 pm
Hi Linda and all others interested in this, No where in the list of Arizona Constitution provisions is Article I, Section 10, Clause 1, Part 5: “No State...
32544 Bill Nixon
seacoastbill Offline Send Email
Sep 1, 2005
2:34 pm
Hey Dannie, Can you quote for me again the section in 26 USC where it makes an individual liable for an income tax? Since you are reading from the real tax...
32545 michaelarc1 Offline Send Email Sep 1, 2005
2:35 pm
Kudos Dennis. Now for extra credit: How many group members have been around long enough to remember when the words "NOT TO BE USED FOR IDENTIFICATION" were on...
32546 Richard Bristol
rlbrist Offline Send Email
Sep 1, 2005
2:35 pm
Ron, Why would the regulation writers cross-reference 861 "as a matter of convenience?" Convenient for what purpose? Must be a reason why they would make 861...
32547 Bill Nixon
seacoastbill Offline Send Email
Sep 1, 2005
2:37 pm
Dennis, Your arguments are sound and you present facts. But you cannot ignore that both parties are equally as evil and that neither has done ANYTHING to stop...
32548 FRANK
frankmymail Offline Send Email
Sep 1, 2005
2:42 pm
Well, my labor and my time are BOTH mine, and my time is an intrinsic quality part of my labor. So, yes, I can 're-invest' my labor which includes my time,...
32549 Ronald L. Weston
ron7695 Offline Send Email
Sep 1, 2005
3:36 pm
Remember, the IRC is not just for you and me it is also for the use of the lawmakers and others in government. It is used by them as a reference to other code...
32550 John Wilde
legalman4208 Offline Send Email
Sep 1, 2005
3:56 pm
As usual azfrench, you don't understand administrative law. Of course the IRS has the authority to enforce the law, and the law authorizes non-judicial...
32551 John Wilde
legalman4208 Offline Send Email
Sep 1, 2005
3:56 pm
Who cares whether the SS Card said it was NOT TO BE USED FOR IDENTIFICATION. It might be valid "if" Social Security were a contract. It's not. So Congress,...
32552 John Wilde
legalman4208 Offline Send Email
Sep 1, 2005
3:58 pm
It isn't in Title 26. Doesn't have to be. It's in the statutes-at-large from 1913 with an amendment in 1916. You are liable. You are either a citizen (for...
32553 Jason
incometaxfre... Offline Send Email
Sep 1, 2005
3:58 pm
... I read your response, but your response did not address my question at all. Maybe you were responding to someone else. I will thus ask again. I...
32554 Ronald L. Weston
ron7695 Offline Send Email
Sep 1, 2005
3:58 pm
Forgot to attach Section 61. Note that the Cross References are in subsection (b), not following the section. Note also that the " Section Referred to in Other...
32555 macwildstar
maczeff Offline Send Email
Sep 1, 2005
4:00 pm
Ok frank.. so I hire you and your labor for 8 hours and pay you 100 bucks for that labor. In 8 hours you made me 10 widgets. I took the widgets and sold them...
32556 azfrench
azfrench2001 Offline Send Email
Sep 1, 2005
7:36 pm
I don't care what law you use, you need a judgment from a court before you have your property taken. ... From: John Wilde To:...
32557 tthor.geo Offline Send Email Sep 1, 2005
7:36 pm
BUT this whole thing ONLY works [or is applicable} IF you are set up as a "business' to use other people's labor. ... bucks ... for 12...
32558 tthor.geo Offline Send Email Sep 1, 2005
7:36 pm
Usually, people who choose to engage in "business" KNOW that they are engaged in business, either as an S Corp., a "proprietorship", a "partnership", a...
32559 Jason
scorp1us Offline Send Email
Sep 1, 2005
7:46 pm
CONGRESS can levy the INCOME tax as EXCISE. Agreed. But at the STATE level, the term CONGRESS does not appy to the STATE LEGISLATURE. Provided that taxation...
32560 tthor.geo Offline Send Email Sep 1, 2005
7:46 pm
Yessir-re Bob! That way, the trained "professionals" will tell you just exactly everything COMMERCIAL CLEARING HOUSE [CCH] has told THEM about what the "Tax...
32561 Dr. Tom
ironman@... Send Email
Sep 1, 2005
7:46 pm
Stupid is as stupid does. I don't know how many times over the years it has been made clear that the cross reference was removed from Section 61 in 2001. In...
32562 Ronald L. Weston
ron7695 Offline Send Email
Sep 1, 2005
7:46 pm
Look at the definitions for "employee", "wages", etc. The proponents of the 861 argument cast these aside. It is the definitions that make the Cracking the...
32563 carpefreedom05 Offline Send Email Sep 1, 2005
7:46 pm
Which statutes might those be Johnny? I'm curious, why isn't it in Title 26? I say again, if it is this easy, then why doesn't THE GOVT JUST ANSWER THE...
32564 Linda Thorpe
indiiangirl47 Offline Send Email
Sep 1, 2005
8:08 pm
Anything you sign is a contract. John Wilde <rsrchsoc@...> wrote:Who cares whether the SS Card said it was NOT TO BE USED FOR IDENTIFICATION. It might...
32565 tthor.geo Offline Send Email Sep 1, 2005
8:38 pm
"Well, golly gee whiz, Clem. I have studied this stuff for YEARS now and I just don't understand the IRC anymore. Maybe you guys can tell me how it's supposed...
32566 Dennis M. Mudd
muddpuppysr Offline Send Email
Sep 1, 2005
10:02 pm
That’s why I refuse to sign ANY GOVERNMENT FORM and tell them right up front that I DO NOT AGGREE to the conditions of their fraudulent documents period. ...
32567 carpefreedom05 Offline Send Email Sep 1, 2005
10:02 pm
Hey Dr. Tom. I'm curious, did the Govt ever offer any reasoning, at the time the cross references were removed, why they were removed. It certainly couldn't...
32568 John Wilde
legalman4208 Offline Send Email
Sep 1, 2005
10:07 pm
I have given the citations MANY, MANY, MANY times. I am tired of looking it up every time the question comes up. It's time you folks learned to do a little...
Messages 32539 - 32568 of 43474   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright © 2010 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines NEW - Help