Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
legality-of-income-tax · We The People - Legality of Income Tax
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Want your group to be featured on the Yahoo! Groups website? Add a group photo to Flickr.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Messages 32539 - 32568 of 43474   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Messages: Simplify | Expand   (Group by Topic) Author Sort by Date ^
32539
Folks: I realize that there are details to be worked out and disagreements, but isn't it time that we determine how to fight the misapplication of the law by...
skefboomer2000
Offline Send Email
Sep 1, 2005
2:34 pm
32540
See sections 7402 and 7403 of the IRS Code. It is the court that has jurisdiction to render Judgments and orders for the enforcement of the tax law, not the...
azfrench
azfrench2001
Offline Send Email
Sep 1, 2005
2:34 pm
32541
Pkmr, You, us, we are fighting against a beast that is huge. They will stop at nothing because the revenue agents receive bonuses, raises, promotions from ...
Bill Nixon
seacoastbill
Offline Send Email
Sep 1, 2005
2:34 pm
32542
How I create capital without using time? Simple.. I buy YOUR time. And I make YOU work.. and I take the results of YOUR labor, and sell it for a profit. Then I...
macwildstar
maczeff
Offline Send Email
Sep 1, 2005
2:34 pm
32543
Hi Linda and all others interested in this, No where in the list of Arizona Constitution provisions is Article I, Section 10, Clause 1, Part 5: “No State...
Virgil Cooper
contrarianfw21
Offline Send Email
Sep 1, 2005
2:34 pm
32544
Hey Dannie, Can you quote for me again the section in 26 USC where it makes an individual liable for an income tax? Since you are reading from the real tax...
Bill Nixon
seacoastbill
Offline Send Email
Sep 1, 2005
2:34 pm
32545
Kudos Dennis. Now for extra credit: How many group members have been around long enough to remember when the words "NOT TO BE USED FOR IDENTIFICATION" were on...
michaelarc1
Offline Send Email
Sep 1, 2005
2:35 pm
32546
Ron, Why would the regulation writers cross-reference 861 "as a matter of convenience?" Convenient for what purpose? Must be a reason why they would make 861...
Richard Bristol
rlbrist
Offline Send Email
Sep 1, 2005
2:35 pm
32547
Dennis, Your arguments are sound and you present facts. But you cannot ignore that both parties are equally as evil and that neither has done ANYTHING to stop...
Bill Nixon
seacoastbill
Offline Send Email
Sep 1, 2005
2:37 pm
32548
Well, my labor and my time are BOTH mine, and my time is an intrinsic quality part of my labor. So, yes, I can 're-invest' my labor which includes my time,...
FRANK
frankmymail
Offline Send Email
Sep 1, 2005
2:42 pm
32549
Remember, the IRC is not just for you and me it is also for the use of the lawmakers and others in government. It is used by them as a reference to other code...
Ronald L. Weston
ron7695
Offline Send Email
Sep 1, 2005
3:36 pm
32550
As usual azfrench, you don't understand administrative law. Of course the IRS has the authority to enforce the law, and the law authorizes non-judicial...
John Wilde
legalman4208
Offline Send Email
Sep 1, 2005
3:56 pm
32551
Who cares whether the SS Card said it was NOT TO BE USED FOR IDENTIFICATION. It might be valid "if" Social Security were a contract. It's not. So Congress,...
John Wilde
legalman4208
Offline Send Email
Sep 1, 2005
3:56 pm
32552
It isn't in Title 26. Doesn't have to be. It's in the statutes-at-large from 1913 with an amendment in 1916. You are liable. You are either a citizen (for...
John Wilde
legalman4208
Offline Send Email
Sep 1, 2005
3:58 pm
32553
... I read your response, but your response did not address my question at all. Maybe you were responding to someone else. I will thus ask again. I...
Jason
incometaxfre...
Offline Send Email
Sep 1, 2005
3:58 pm
32554
Forgot to attach Section 61. Note that the Cross References are in subsection (b), not following the section. Note also that the " Section Referred to in Other...
Ronald L. Weston
ron7695
Offline Send Email
Sep 1, 2005
3:58 pm
32555
Ok frank.. so I hire you and your labor for 8 hours and pay you 100 bucks for that labor. In 8 hours you made me 10 widgets. I took the widgets and sold them...
macwildstar
maczeff
Offline Send Email
Sep 1, 2005
4:00 pm
32556
I don't care what law you use, you need a judgment from a court before you have your property taken. ... From: John Wilde To:...
azfrench
azfrench2001
Offline Send Email
Sep 1, 2005
7:36 pm
32557
BUT this whole thing ONLY works [or is applicable} IF you are set up as a "business' to use other people's labor. ... bucks ... for 12...
tthor.geo
Offline Send Email
Sep 1, 2005
7:36 pm
32558
Usually, people who choose to engage in "business" KNOW that they are engaged in business, either as an S Corp., a "proprietorship", a "partnership", a...
tthor.geo
Offline Send Email
Sep 1, 2005
7:36 pm
32559
CONGRESS can levy the INCOME tax as EXCISE. Agreed. But at the STATE level, the term CONGRESS does not appy to the STATE LEGISLATURE. Provided that taxation...
Jason
scorp1us
Offline Send Email
Sep 1, 2005
7:46 pm
32560
Yessir-re Bob! That way, the trained "professionals" will tell you just exactly everything COMMERCIAL CLEARING HOUSE [CCH] has told THEM about what the "Tax...
tthor.geo
Offline Send Email
Sep 1, 2005
7:46 pm
32561
Stupid is as stupid does. I don't know how many times over the years it has been made clear that the cross reference was removed from Section 61 in 2001. In...
Dr. Tom
ironman@...
Send Email
Sep 1, 2005
7:46 pm
32562
Look at the definitions for "employee", "wages", etc. The proponents of the 861 argument cast these aside. It is the definitions that make the Cracking the...
Ronald L. Weston
ron7695
Offline Send Email
Sep 1, 2005
7:46 pm
32563
Which statutes might those be Johnny? I'm curious, why isn't it in Title 26? I say again, if it is this easy, then why doesn't THE GOVT JUST ANSWER THE...
carpefreedom05
Offline Send Email
Sep 1, 2005
7:46 pm
32564
Anything you sign is a contract. John Wilde <rsrchsoc@...> wrote:Who cares whether the SS Card said it was NOT TO BE USED FOR IDENTIFICATION. It might...
Linda Thorpe
indiiangirl47
Offline Send Email
Sep 1, 2005
8:08 pm
32565
"Well, golly gee whiz, Clem. I have studied this stuff for YEARS now and I just don't understand the IRC anymore. Maybe you guys can tell me how it's supposed...
tthor.geo
Offline Send Email
Sep 1, 2005
8:38 pm
32566
That’s why I refuse to sign ANY GOVERNMENT FORM and tell them right up front that I DO NOT AGGREE to the conditions of their fraudulent documents period. ...
Dennis M. Mudd
muddpuppysr
Offline Send Email
Sep 1, 2005
10:02 pm
32567
Hey Dr. Tom. I'm curious, did the Govt ever offer any reasoning, at the time the cross references were removed, why they were removed. It certainly couldn't...
carpefreedom05
Offline Send Email
Sep 1, 2005
10:02 pm
32568
I have given the citations MANY, MANY, MANY times. I am tired of looking it up every time the question comes up. It's time you folks learned to do a little...
John Wilde
legalman4208
Offline Send Email
Sep 1, 2005
10:07 pm
Messages 32539 - 32568 of 43474   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Advanced
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help