Dear Mr. Rookard, Your May 19th response to acta (Post #9782) reads in part: "Whether the 16th Amendment was ratified or not was rendered a moot point with the...
acta@...
Jun 1, 2001 8:59 pm
10047
Dear Mr. Rookard, Your May 19th response to acta (Post #9782) reads in part: "Since the income tax is an indirect tax ... it doesn't have to be apportioned." ...
acta@...
Jun 1, 2001 9:00 pm
10048
Dear Mr. Rookard, Your May 19th response to acta (Post #9782) reads in part: "Instead of holding up these idiotic court rulings as his proof ... Mr. Benson...
acta@...
Jun 1, 2001 9:00 pm
10049
Dear Mr. Rookard, Your May 19th response to acta (Post #9782) reads in part: "QUOTE: 'It was not the purpose or effect of that amendment to bring any new...
acta@...
Jun 1, 2001 9:01 pm
10050
Dear Mr. Rookard, Your May 19th response to acta (Post #9782) reads in part: The limited scope of the Pollock ruling has been noted since then ... "QUOTE: 'The...
acta@...
Jun 1, 2001 9:01 pm
10051
Dear Mr. Rookard, Your May 19th response to acta (Post #9782) reads in part: "The limited scope of the Pollock ruling has been noted since then ... QUOTE: 'A...
acta@...
Jun 1, 2001 9:01 pm
10052
Dear Mr. Rookard, Your May 19th response to acta (Post #9782) reads in part: "Even the Eisner court, in a passage a few paragraphs above Mr. Benson's quote...
acta@...
Jun 1, 2001 9:02 pm
10053
Dear Mr. Rookard, Your May 19th response to acta (Post #9782) reads in part: "Actually, the issue of the ratification of the 16th Amendment is irrelevant....
acta@...
Jun 1, 2001 9:02 pm
10054
Dear Mr. Rookard, Your May 19th response to acta (Post #9782) reads in part: "And the Eisner court doesn't say 'all property' ... it says 'direct taxes upon...
acta@...
Jun 1, 2001 9:02 pm
10055
Dear Mr. Rookard, Your May 23nd response to rpalmq (Post #9830) reads in part: " The Hylton case is very important ... in that case, the basically decided that...
acta@...
Jun 1, 2001 9:03 pm
10056
Dear Mr. Rookard, Your May 24th response to myztico (Post #9913) reads in part: "That the laws of every country ought to be executed, cannot be denied. That...
acta@...
Jun 1, 2001 9:03 pm
10057
Dear Mr. Rookard, Your May 25th response to RCS (Post #9937) reads in part: "In Pollock v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co., 158 U.S. 601, the court admittedly said...
acta@...
Jun 1, 2001 9:07 pm
10058
Happy June to all, and may we humbly continue to beseech the Lord to prevail in leading us in our battle for Truth in His name. This is the root of the issue....
easton1776@...
Jun 2, 2001 1:39 am
10059
Bob, My hat goes off to you for your response to Brian. Keep up the good work. ... _________________________________________________________________ Get your...
Bart Simpson
bartsimpson4321@...
Jun 2, 2001 1:44 am
10060
HMMMMMMM.....Since Brian Boy never answered the simple question if he/she ever requested a copy of theit IMF....& if so how was he/she classified by the IR$...
myztico@...
Jun 2, 2001 1:48 am
10061
WOW!!! Damn good examples!! Richard S. ... === message truncated === __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get personalized email...
RCS
rcs36@...
Jun 2, 2001 1:49 am
10062
Robert, I agree whole heartedly. The 16th Amendment is basiclly a "cover all." Now that all "incomes" (note the word "Incomes") are covered, it is up to...
RCS
rcs36@...
Jun 2, 2001 1:49 am
10063
"The first term is an object ... the second is an act in which the object is used. Now, keeping the above in mind ... what is the difference between your...
Jim Jenkins
jjenkins@...
Jun 2, 2001 1:50 am
10064
Does anyone have an electronic copy of IRS form 2555? If so, could you please email it to me? Anyone know why this hangs/stops when one tries to download it...
thenetprophet-online@...
Jun 2, 2001 1:51 am
10065
Brian: I join Bob Schultz in lauding your sophistication. Could you please add to this impression by confirming your identity? We don't need your resume. Just...
Richard Palmquist
rpalmq@...
Jun 2, 2001 1:52 am
10066
From: "John Weber" <scjohn@...> From: se-ncsc@... ... Thank you for subscribing to the Local News Net, the IRS e-mail service. ...
ICE
ice@...
Jun 2, 2001 1:54 am
10067
Brian, No answer? I admit that theses are not legal questions. They are questions of morals and ethics. I guess they are out of your league. Dave ... From: "...
Dave Toney
wdtoney@...
Jun 2, 2001 2:19 am
10068
HERE IT IS AGAIN- INCOME DEFINED: Below I have provided ONE OF the regulations which define the term INCOME. I also saw similar definitions given in...
Renee O Hara
rohara5@...
Jun 2, 2001 2:39 am
10069
Here is a copy - not sure if its the latest. ... From: <thenetprophet-online@...> To: <teaparty@yahoogroups.com>;...
Ronald Weston
rlweston@...
Jun 2, 2001 2:40 am
10070
Is this true? Is the acceptance of "legal tender" really required of every
merchant? Have people been sent to jail for refusing debt money?
Jon
-----...
Jon Davis
jond_123@...
Jun 2, 2001 3:52 am
10071
Here's some food for thought for those of you who still aren't sure of the disgrace of the Federal Reserve Act and the infinite and immeasurable value of...
Jon Davis
jond_123@...
Jun 2, 2001 1:51 pm
10072
I have misgivings about this. The problems with this are three-fold:
1. The current year is 2001
2. It defines income with "all wealth which flows in..."...
Jon Davis
jond_123@...
Jun 2, 2001 1:54 pm
10073
Income is not defined in the statutes or the Constitution because to do so
would be to expose the fraudulent nature of the currency.
Income is obviously any...
Jon Davis
jond_123@...
Jun 2, 2001 1:54 pm
10074
This subject falls in line with the convenience stores that do not accept $50-$100 bills, now I wonder if that is legal??...
Gideon
preparednessnow@...
Jun 2, 2001 1:57 pm
10075
Excuse me Jon Davis, but show me any word defined within the Constitution please.... You can't because they don't exist, not within the document itself. So,...
Having problems with message search?
Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.
