"Who shall ascend into the hill of the LORD?...He that hath clean hands, and a pure heart...." Ps. 24:3-4 Hi, John; The Son, the Christed One, does nothing "of...
410
Jim Stuart
jimstuart46
Jan 1, 2005 8:44 pm
Hi Willy, I've just finished reading Concluding Unscientific Postscript, and after I have re-read my notes, I'll try to formulate my thoughts on the two issues...
411
Will Brown
wilbro99
Jan 1, 2005 11:05 pm
Hi JimS, a short note. The point you raise (see below) is interesting in that I see many scholars puzzling over SK's pseudonymous denial of being a Christian....
412
Jim Stuart
jimstuart46
Jan 3, 2005 9:07 pm
Dear Kierkegaardians, I wish to offer my response to my first reading of Concluding Unscientific Postscript. Whilst I do put forward some tentative criticisms...
415
Will Brown
wilbro99
Jan 4, 2005 9:46 pm
Hi JimS, my first thought on reading what you have written here was 'the quandary that is Kierkegaard.' Let me ramble on a bit using that as my springboard....
416
John Anngeister
reader606
Jan 5, 2005 12:56 am
Ben & Jim, Ben, I feel it is you to whom I owe the first apology, not only for having cut off my own reading of CUP, but for my lack of response to your post...
417
John Anngeister
reader606
Jan 6, 2005 7:14 am
Willy, and any other... re "Purity of Heart," (Steere trans., Chap. 1). I see K by the end of this chapter (p 36-38) warning against a common "wisdom of life"...
418
Jim Stuart
jimstuart46
Jan 6, 2005 11:29 pm
Ben, Thank you very much for your detailed and very instructive response to my remarks on Concluding Unscientific Postscript. Completing my reading of CUP and...
419
Will Brown
wilbro99
Jan 7, 2005 7:55 pm
Hi John, I have appended a site that has the e-text of Steere's translation of Purity. It may help others to join in without having to obtain the book. Ok, to...
420
sartre
Jan 8, 2005 12:11 pm
Fellow members: Significant updates have been made on the Existentialism page: http://batr.org/existentialism.html and on the Metaphysics page:...
421
Médéric Laitier
hidepark21
Jan 16, 2005 5:28 pm
Dear Kierkegaardians, Here it is with a new year for enduring. Suffer therefore the following low-light contribution with your accustomed gentleness. Happy new...
423
Jim Stuart
jimstuart46
Jan 22, 2005 5:49 pm
Dear Kierkegaardians, Kierkegaard tells us to strive to increase our subjectivity to the highest degree. He tells us not to be concerned with 'the objective',...
424
Médéric Laitier
hidepark21
Jan 23, 2005 6:39 pm
Dear Mr Stuart, I understand the last months have been of a rare intensity for your pondering over the kierkegaardian 'quandaries' as another Kierkegaardian ...
425
Will Brown
wilbro99
Jan 23, 2005 10:59 pm
Jim, thank you for a well structured edifice to the disjunction that seems to be Kierkegaard. I'll change the shape of it a tad, give it a twist, and ask you...
426
Médéric Laitier
hidepark21
Jan 24, 2005 8:02 pm
Hello willy, It has been a while since our last exchange and I am terribly afraid I failed to keep my word, which was to come back to you for some shredding...
428
Will Brown
wilbro99
Jan 25, 2005 1:44 am
Hi Rickle, how have you been? How did you find your way in here? I am sure you know that K on the Internet has gone belly up; shame that is. We had some...
429
Médéric Laitier
hidepark21
Jan 25, 2005 1:26 pm
Yeeee... I recognize some willian style in your answer, fellow for I hope you expected me not to settle myself in the 'no' perspective you tackled. But you...
431
Will Brown
wilbro99
Jan 28, 2005 5:01 am
Meddy: <There is a quite interesting disjunction I would like to finally introduce: Either disjuntion or no-disjuntion...I believe this is of such a matter...
432
Médéric Laitier
hidepark21
Jan 28, 2005 1:51 pm
Hello willy, Now better accustomed to disjunctive thinking, I believe I can undertake a correct answer to your question regarding disjunctive inward's...
434
Jim Stuart
jimstuart46
Jan 28, 2005 7:48 pm
Hi Willy, Thank you for your thought-provoking reply to my post on Subjectivity, Uncertainty and Risk. As usual your post has helped me to clarify my...
435
Jim Stuart
jimstuart46
Jan 28, 2005 7:50 pm
Dear Mederic, Thank you for your positive response to my posting on Subjectivity, Uncertainty, and Risk. You raise a number of significant points which have...
436
Médéric Laitier
hidepark21
Jan 29, 2005 11:47 pm
Dear Jim, You are welcome and your answers allow as usual further thinking and better demarcation. It is my duty to admit some imprecision in my account of...
437
Médéric Laitier
hidepark21
Jan 29, 2005 11:47 pm
Hello Rick, And welcome to the Kierkegaardians for I believe nobody but old will [W.] has shown the quite trully Sisiphian effort of welcoming you under the...
438
Will Brown
wilbro99
Jan 30, 2005 12:24 am
Two for the Price of One. Hi hookah, I am guilty; a one-trick dog & pony show is my being. For the world to see, I will reveal that trick. There is a sense of...
439
Will Brown
wilbro99
Jan 30, 2005 7:01 pm
Hi Jim, I have written and deleted several responses, each foundering on the following consideration. We have a text in common, SK's writings, and we are...
441
Jim Stuart
jimstuart46
Jan 31, 2005 6:45 pm
Dear Mederic, Once again thank you for a stimulating response to one of my postings. You make me realize that my own understanding of Kierkegaard is still...
442
Jim Stuart
jimstuart46
Jan 31, 2005 6:52 pm
Hi Willy, I penned the following before I received your latest post, but I'll leave it in tact, as I don't think anything in your post of 29th Jan answers my...
443
Will Brown
wilbro99
Jan 31, 2005 10:57 pm
Rickle el Hook, you are the sort of nemesis one preys for. With you half-views in hand, you offer up the chance for another to fill in the crescent, to light...
444
Will Brown
wilbro99
Feb 2, 2005 3:11 am
Hey, hook, did your refer to that littlebluelight site purposively? I just looked over the K quotes on the site and it sure looks like someone lifted most of...
445
Médéric Laitier
hidepark21
Feb 3, 2005 6:16 pm
Dear Jim, Your but last posting gave me some homeworks to do before I could sit here and answer. Try to answer. A general comment first: If I were to agree...
