" i agree that kant is a realist, and he certainly says so himself: an empirical realist and a transcendental idealist. part of what this means, i take it,
"Independent activity" means activity independent of Spirit. There is no theory of affection in Fichte's system, nothing to affect the Ego except Ego itself. I
Our only misunderstanding could arise over the word "ought" which even in common language has a dual meaning, a moral and a theoretical one. We know what a
Not really. The thing-in-itself is such a product for Fichte, so the question remains of what produces the ought. What produces this "ought" for Kant's moral