Dear Wali, I am putting a copy of "The Johannine Son of Man" in the mail for you today. As far as payment is concerned, I will not be at the SBL meeting. I...
874
Peter Hofrichter
Peter.Hofrichter@...
Oct 16, 2000 12:32 pm
Dear Pete! I respect all scepticism against historical criticisme and reconstructions but one has to explain the breaks and inconsitencies of our text. The...
873
Francis J. Moloney, SDB
moloney@...
Oct 16, 2000 12:18 pm
As I am totally occupied with bringing a major commentary on Mark to its conclusion, I have not been able to keep up with my Johannine reading. My reaction to...
872
Maluflen@...
Oct 16, 2000 10:58 am
In a message dated 10/15/2000 4:20:35 PM Eastern Daylight Time, moloney@... writes: << You will find that I argue that 19:5 looks back to the S of M...
871
Pete Phillips
p.m.phillips@...
Oct 16, 2000 7:17 am
Although of course Peter's reconstruction of Johannine vorlage is his reconstruction. It is not fact and should not be portrayed as fact. The truth is we we...
870
Francis Moloney
moloney@...
Oct 15, 2000 8:20 pm
Mesfin, Not yet ... I am struggling to keep up with what I do every day ... let alone the list! Frank ... From: mesfin <mesfin@...> To:...
869
Francis Moloney
moloney@...
Oct 15, 2000 8:19 pm
Bill, You will find that I argue that 19:5 looks back to the S of M sayings. I would still claim that is the case. On the second remark of your note: when I...
868
Peter Hofrichter
Peter.Hofrichter@...
Oct 15, 2000 4:38 pm
Dear Ken! You ask: Why was the Gospel of John ascribed to John? In a later stratum the figure of the Belolved Disciple was introduced and pushed the original...
867
Maluflen@...
Oct 15, 2000 1:21 pm
In a message dated 10/15/2000 6:25:36 AM Eastern Daylight Time, Peter.Hofrichter@... writes: << Dear Tom! I answer to your question contrary to what most...
866
Ken Durkin
ind.fin.choices@...
Oct 15, 2000 11:39 am
... From: Peter Hofrichter <Peter.Hofrichter@...> To: <johannine_literature@egroups.com> Sent: Saturday, January 16, 2021 10:28 AM Subject: Re:...
865
Peter Hofrichter
Peter.Hofrichter@...
Oct 15, 2000 10:24 am
Dear Tom! I answer to your question contrary to what most people still believe: Not John depends on the Synoptics but the Synoptics depend on "John" and were...
864
mesfin
mesfin@...
Oct 15, 2000 1:57 am
On October 12 Paul Anderson asked Frank Moloney's input to modify Lindar's approach on the issue of the Son of Man. I am wondering if he did and I missed it. ...
863
Maluflen@...
Oct 15, 2000 12:49 am
In a message dated 10/14/2000 6:19:13 PM Eastern Daylight Time, wskelton76@... writes: << Would Pilate's "idou ho anthropos", "behold the man" in...
862
Bill Skelton
wskelton76@...
Oct 14, 2000 10:18 pm
Would Pilate's "idou ho anthropos", "behold the man" in John 19:5 be intended to recall in irony the "ho huios tou anthropou", Son of Man, self-designation of...
861
Paul Anderson
panderso@...
Oct 14, 2000 6:47 pm
Thanks, Mark, good observations here too. I hesitate to contribute here because I have outlined my views on Johannine/Synoptic relations rather extensively...
860
FMMCCOY
FMMCCOY@...
Oct 14, 2000 3:16 am
In his 11 Oct. 2000 post, Piet van Veldhuizen makes some suggestions regarding John 4 in general and 4:22 in particular. I would like to know what he means...
859
Jack Kilmon
jkilmon@...
Oct 13, 2000 8:24 pm
... From: "Mark Goodacre" <M.S.Goodacre@...> To: <johannine_literature@egroups.com> Sent: Friday, October 13, 2000 3:08 AM Subject: Re: [John_Lit] FG...
858
Maluflen@...
Oct 13, 2000 11:07 am
In a message dated 10/13/2000 6:32:54 AM Eastern Daylight Time, M.S.Goodacre@... writes: << Although I'm not yet convinced, one should also bear in mind...
857
Mark Goodacre
M.S.Goodacre@...
Oct 13, 2000 10:19 am
... Although I'm not yet convinced, one should also bear in mind the relatively new suggestion that Luke knew John's Gospel. This is argued in an Oxford MLitt...
856
C.W..Wali van Lohuizen
BPBwalisufi@...
Oct 13, 2000 9:16 am
Dear Frank Moloney Only now I am aware of the possibility of obtaining your book. If there is a spare copy still, I would appriciate to get one. Payment from...
855
Paul Anderson
panderso@...
Oct 12, 2000 11:23 pm
Thanks, David, many thoughtful insights here! PA Paul N. Anderson Professor of Biblical and Quaker Studies George Fox University Newberg, OR 97132 503-554-2651...
854
David Rensberger
drensberger@...
Oct 12, 2000 8:31 pm
Tom, ... I wouldn't be surprised if he'd read Mark--after all, if Mark invented the "gospel" form, John has to have at least known about it--but I don't think...
853
Paul Anderson
panderso@...
Oct 12, 2000 5:12 pm
On the use of the Son of Man title, Lindars poses that it was used by Jesus in reference to his obedience and humble faithfulness to his mission (thus...
852
Francis J. Moloney, SDB
moloney@...
Oct 12, 2000 12:30 pm
Dear Everyone, Just a note to let everyone who sent me a request and an address for a copy of my Johannine Son of Man. As of 8.30am on Thursday, October 12,...
851
kaare.fuglseth@...
Oct 12, 2000 7:46 am
... I think you need to be more precise with your notion "eschatological" here. Surely, the eshaton in its temporal sense is not mentioned in this passage, ...
850
gds@...
Oct 11, 2000 5:05 pm
Felix, Good response. I laughed at the practicality of your first insight - but alas, probably all too true. As to your question: The more I think about your...
849
Maluflen@...
Oct 11, 2000 3:02 pm
In a message dated 10/10/2000 11:36:19 AM Eastern Daylight Time, tom.thatcher@... writes: << Q1: Did the Fourth Evangelist utilize the Synoptic...
848
Maluflen@...
Oct 11, 2000 2:40 pm
In a message dated 10/11/2000 5:46:10 AM Eastern Daylight Time, fjust@... writes: << Also, placing Mark before Matthew (as many...
847
Piet van Veldhuizen
pi.veldhuizen@...
Oct 11, 2000 2:06 pm
Although the discussion about the Iouda* root in John seems to have been finished some weks ago, I would like to propose an explanation of the John 4,22...
846
Felix Just, S.J.
fjust@...
Oct 11, 2000 9:43 am
... Gary - The first effect would be on the publisher, not the readesr, since very few copies of such a Bible would ever be sold, most likely! :-) Your...
