I've lived and traveled in plenty of other nations

including third world and experienced freedom like I used to
here in America! Believe me when I say there is far
less government intrusion into people's lives in almost
every other country I've ever been to!

Other countries are looking at America

with their mouths wide open because of this.

--Bob Striffler

 

RE: Comments on your article to JAIL 4 JUDGES

To respond

You are clearly one of many who just don't see a problem with our courts today. Out of the folks I've had the pleasure of corresponding or talking with that have like mind with you, I've found you are folks
who've not experienced what others have and are absolutely appalled about.

 

People are not outraged to the extent they are because nothing has happened to them. People are not outraged because they're all liars about their situations. This is far too widespread. There is a mountain of allegations, evidence, documentation, shocking news articles, video
taped accounts and documentaries showing absolute abuse with no accountability whatsoever! Other countries are looking at America with their mouths wide open because of this.

What's become of our judiciary is malignancy! The courts have, for a long time, been interpreting things into cases that are not even written into the legislation that becomes law! Apparently it's hard for those like yourself to grasp this, what others have had forced upon them, because it hasn't happened to you. Apparently that is what makes it not real for you. Also, as I would expect, you may respond with, "it's not a perfect system but it's better than anywhere else."

Well you're wrong on two counts. First, if followed, what was blueprinted in our Constitution, Bill of Rights and the first 150 years of high court and Supreme court rulings, it would be a perfect system.
Since then even the Supreme court has begun committing treasonous acts!  Now the reason I know this is because of my appalling experiences and those of people I've known; I've dedicated much of my life to studying this degradation! You and others like minded
haven't. I'd put my money on it. Second, I've lived and traveled in plenty of other nations including third world and experienced freedom like I used to here in America! Believe me when I say there is far less government intrusion into people's lives in almost every other country I've ever been to!

Judges have declared through case law all the way to the Supreme Court, "Absolute Immunity" for Judges and Prosecutors. They've declared "Qualified Immunity" for virtually all other public servants as well! And in following the cases involving the conduct of, or laws
broken by, Judges, Prosecutors, Police, Code Enforcement, Dept. of Children and Families, etc... they are almost invariably found innocent or charges are deferred.

I can even explain to you how this all transpires and is being enacted. It's being done by illegal Judicial instructions, powers assumed by Attorneys General and US Attorneys, (state and federal) non-motivated or outright hamstrung constitutional, civil and criminal defense attorneys, total lack of Congressional or Senate oversight, absolute self-regulation and a media that has no problem showing OJ, Kobe, Michael or the Runaway Bride crimes like beating a dead horse, but seems so obviously reluctant to give any meaningful coverage of even the most grievous offenses committed by these public servants. These protectors of our "freedoms" do nothing more than hide behind elegant rhetoric and well-dressed mannerisms, all the while lying to your face!

There are organizations with databases chock full of an astonishing amount of proof that this is so widespread and downright oppressive. If you can't even understand that "FREEDOM" can't be administered by those who've declared "ABSOLUTE IMMUNITY AND SELF
REGULATION," then you are clearly beyond absorbing input of any kind that would enlighten you.

If by any chance I'm wrong and you do want enlightenment, then I'd be happy to conduct further correspondence in which I would send you shocking tale after tale of an abomination of judicial abuse; and I would even supply avenues where you could verify these tales on your own. Then hopefully your eyes would be opened. Until then I can only hope your experiences would resemble a saying I heard regarding the Nazi takeover. (I won't get this right but close enough.) 

        When they came for my neighbors, I worried not.

        When they came for my friends, I said, "Not me?"

        Then they came for me!

There is a story in the Bible about the unrighteous judge and the widow. Here's a quote that says it all:
        "The judge neither regarded man nor feared God" 
 
Yours truly,
Bob Striffler

---

J.A.I.L.- Judicial Accountability Initiative Law - www.jail4judges.org
Contribute to J.A.I.L. at P.O. Box 207, N. Hollywood, CA 91603
See our active flash, http://www.jail4judges.org/national_001.htm
JAIL is a unique addition to our form of gov't. heretofore unrealized.
JAIL is powerful! JAIL is dynamic! JAIL is America's ONLY hope!
E-Group sign on at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jail4judges/join
Get involved at JAIL_SALE_USA-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
To be added or removed, write to VictoryUSA@...
Your help is needed: www.SouthDakotaJudicialAccountability.com
 
"..it does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless
minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds.." - Samuel Adams
 
"There are a thousand hacking at the branches of evil to one who is
striking at the root."                         -- Henry David Thoreau    <><

J.A.I.L. News Journal
______________________________________________________
Los Angeles, California                                                 October 2, 2005
______________________________________________________
Mission Statement                  JNJ Library                     PayPal Support
Federal J.A.I.L.                           FAQs                    What?MeWarden?
______________________________________________________

www.SouthDakotaJudicialAccountability.org

The regular readers of J.A.I.L. News Journals have oft heard the statement that J.A.I.L. will one day eventually encompass this entire country from sea to shining sea, as is also announced on our website at http://www.jail4judges.org/national_001.htm.

 

Nothing makes a point like one's opposition, and in this case, it is the American Bar Association, to wit, "Half of U.S. Sees 'Judicial Activism Crisis.' "  In other words, according to a poll conducted by the ABA, half of America sees the judiciary for what it is, an unaccountable entity in need of oversight outside and beyond itself. While this ABA article says nothing directly to confirm J.A.I.L.'s claim that it will one day encompass all America, it does layout the very reason why this will be so.

 

The American Bar Association's answer to this "overwhelming problem" reflected in their poll is to "educate" the American People on how the judiciary works. Of course, our respond is to say that the more the ABA tries to inform the American People on how the judiciary works, the more People will see the judiciary for what it is -- a totally corrupt and unaccountable entity that has totally run amuck with the Constitution and the laws of our nation -- men who make up laws as they go.

 

It should be quite interesting watching the ABA trying to place a good face on our nation's judiciary. Like bring gasoline to a fire, their comments will surely fan the flames of controversy, enlarging the fireline. Thousands of People with experience will rush to the front lines of the controversy to engage with the ABA. You can count on the fact that every word of the ABA will be dissected and will become the subject of another controversial subject of debate. The bottom line is, if the ABA is thinks the viewpoints of the American People are misguided, just wait until the ABA tries to clear up the problem and give the judiciary a face lift. I'm looking forward to this engagement. In reality, the ABA will draw more attention to the answer found at <Federal J.A.I.L.> located above in this heading.

                                                                -Ron Branson, J.A.I.L. CIC.

 

Half of U.S. Sees 'Judicial Activism Crisis'
http://www.abanet.org/journal/ereport/s30survey.html

  
ABA Journal Survey Results Surprise Some Legal Experts
BY MARTHA NEIL

More than half of Americans are angry and disappointed with the nation's judiciary, a new survey done for the ABA Journal eReport shows.
A majority of the survey respondents agreed with statements that "judicial activism" has reached the crisis stage, and that judges who ignore voters' values should be impeached. Nearly half agreed with a congressman who said judges are "arrogant, out-of-control and unaccountable."

The survey results surprised some legal experts with the extent of dissatisfaction shown toward the judiciary. "These are surprisingly large numbers," says Mark V. Tushnet, a constitutional law professor at Georgetown University Law Center in Washington, D.C.

"These results are simply scary," adds Charles G. Geyh, a constitutional law professor at Indiana University School of Law in Bloomington.

The Opinion Research Corp. conducted the survey, calling 1,016 adults throughout the country in early September. Participants included 505 men and 511 women aged 18 or older. Due to the effects of Hurricane Katrina, residents of Alabama, Louisiana and Mississippi were not polled.

Calls were made to a random sample of American households. Those surveyed were asked questions about their age and education levels, and were asked to give one of six answers-strongly agree, somewhat agree, neither agree nor disagree, somewhat disagree, strongly disagree or don't know-in response to public statements criticizing the judiciary.

Fifty-six percent of the respondents strongly or somewhat agreed with the opinions expressed in each of two survey statements:

  a.. A U.S. congressman has said, "Judicial activism . seems to have reached a crisis. Judges routinely overrule the will of the people, invent new rights and ignore traditional morality." (Twenty-nine percent strongly agreed and 27 percent somewhat agreed.)
  a.. A state governor has said that court opinions should be in line with voters' values, and judges who repeatedly ignore those values should be impeached. (Twenty-eight percent strongly agreed and 28 percent somewhat agreed.)
Forty-six percent strongly or somewhat agreed with the opinion expressed in a third statement:

  a.. A U.S. congressman has called judges arrogant, out-of-control and unaccountable. (Twenty-one percent strongly agreed and 25 percent somewhat agreed.)
Among the respondents, younger adults were less likely than older adults to agree with all three statements. Those with a college education were more likely to disagree with the statements than high school graduates.

Only 30 percent of respondents somewhat or strongly disagreed with the first statement and 32 percent felt the same way about the second statement. The most disagreement was reflected in the responses to the third statement, with which 38 percent took issue.

Two percent to 3 percent responded "don't know," and the remainder of the respondents neither agreed nor disagreed with the statements.

The margin of error for the survey is plus or minus 3 percentage points, at the 95 percent confidence level. Opinion Research Corp. says survey results were "weighted by age, sex, geographic region and race to ensure reliable and accurate representation of the total population."

The congressman referenced in the first question is Rep. Lamar Smith, R-Texas, who made the comment at an April 2005 rally in Washington, D.C. The governor in the second question is Matt Blunt, a Missouri Republican, who reportedly made the comment during an interview with a religious publication in May 2005. The congressman in the third question is House Majority Leader Tom DeLay of Texas, who made the comment in March 2005.

Several legal scholars responding to the survey results were startled by the numbers.

Georgetown's Tushnet says he didn't realize the level of dissatisfaction was so high. "What I had thought was the case was that there was a significantly higher residue of general respect for the courts," he says. "And these numbers suggest that that's not true."

Geyh of Indiana University says the survey suggests "a trajectory" upward in the number of people unhappy with the American judiciary-apparently simply because these critics disagree with the law that judges have a duty to apply.

The idea that judges should "somehow follow the voters' views really reflects a fundamental misunderstanding of what judges are supposed to do," he continues. "They should only be criticized when they ignore the law and start infusing their own values into the law regardless of the law."

But one legal scholar with an alternative viewpoint is not surprised. The survey results reflect the reality that "there is a lot of judicial activism under any definition," says John O. McGinnis, a professor at Northwestern University School of Law in Chicago.

"This problem has been coming for a very long time," he says. "I think, for most of [the past] century, the idea of the Constitution as a document that should be interpreted formally and without regard to the judge's own values has been under attack." Judges today also do not give due deference to legislative decisions, and too frequently strike down statutory law, he adds.

Part of the problem, too, McGinnis believes, is that legislators on both sides of the aisle are conducting judicial confirmation hearings as though the candidates' personal political views are relevant to their role on the bench. "Everyone thinks that's what [judges] do, and they just want their own values" to be reflected by the judiciary, McGinnis says.

In a written statement, Rep. Smith said judges today "seem to be promoters of a partisan agenda, not wise teachers relying on established law." As a co-equal branch of the federal government, however, the judiciary is subject to congressional oversight as part of our system of checks and balances, he continued. So "Congress is right to evaluate judges when they behave like unelected superlegislators who want to implement their own social agenda."

Spokespersons for Blunt and DeLay did not respond to requests for comment.

The survey figures did not catch ABA President Michael S. Greco by surprise, either. Instead, he views the results as further confirmation of the need for new ABA programs now under way to educate the public about how American government works, and the role played by judges in a democratic society. Judicial independence is also the subject of three feature articles in the October issue of the ABA Journal.

One of Greco's first actions after taking office in August was to appoint a Commission on Civic Education and the Separation of Powers. In his President's Message in the October Journal, Greco said the commission was created to address what he terms an "alarming increase in rhetorical and physical attacks on the judiciary." The bipartisan commission is intended to educate Americans about the role of an independent judiciary in U.S. government.

A poll commissioned by the ABA in July from Harris Interactive showed a "shocking" 40 percent of respondents could not correctly identify the three branches of government, Greco wrote.

The commission will help rectify this situation, Greco says, in two ways: First, it will "find out why it is that half the people polled don't know how their government works." Second, it will work with teachers' groups to address "this sorry state of civic education."

Greco hopes to bring lawyers throughout the country into the nation's schools on Law Day as part of a larger program of civic education about the separation of powers and the role of the judiciary. "This is in the preliminary stages, but the thought is, around Law Day, have a program that is carried on C-Span and perhaps beamed into every school in the country."

Held on May 1 each year, Law Day is recognized as a time to focus on how the rule of law makes democracy possible.

Robert H. Rawson Jr., a Cleveland lawyer who chairs the commission, emphasizes that these educational efforts will be nonpartisan. "Our objective is not to get into the politics of judicial selection, but rather to fill what appears to be a gap in general public understanding of the fundamental role of a judge," he says, and "restore what needs restoring-the confidence and trust of the American public in the judiciary."

The commission has two honorary co-chairs: retiring U.S. Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O'Connor and former U.S. Sen. Bill Bradley of New Jersey.

The October ABA Journal includes three features on judicial independence:

  a.. A roundtable discussion by legal experts on recent attacks on the judicial branch.
  b.. A look at hot-button cases that are raising the hackles of the American public.
  c.. A report on how Serbia is addressing issues of judicial independence and the rule of law in its effort to enter the European Union.

©2005 ABA Journal

---

J.A.I.L.- Judicial Accountability Initiative Law - www.jail4judges.org
Contribute to J.A.I.L. at P.O. Box 207, N. Hollywood, CA 91603
See our active flash, http://www.jail4judges.org/national_001.htm
JAIL is a unique addition to our form of gov't. heretofore unrealized.
JAIL is powerful! JAIL is dynamic! JAIL is America's ONLY hope!
E-Group sign on at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jail4judges/join
Get involved at JAIL_SALE_USA-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
To be added or removed, write to VictoryUSA@...
Your help is needed: www.SouthDakotaJudicialAccountability.com
 
"..it does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless
minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds.." - Samuel Adams
 
"There are a thousand hacking at the branches of evil to one who is
striking at the root."                         -- Henry David Thoreau    <><

(J.A.I.L.'s response follows below)

October 7, 2005

 

Ron Branson

J.A.I.L.4judges

 

            This is in response to your recent article, “Traffic Courts”.  You have provided some good and valid information in this piece, but you end it by saying that this jig will not be up until the passage of J.A.I.L. because there is too much money in it.  We admire the objectives of J.A.I.L., but we strongly disagree that the fraudulent, deceptive and criminal actions of the court cannot be stopped now, because we have stopped those unconstitutional courts by our group’s winning over 300 victories in New Mexico courts, without any losses.  Our methods are based in and supported by the Constitution.  We have attempted, on many, many occasions, to share our methods with your members and to support the J.A.I.L platform, but you have never responded, once, to our E-mails.

 

            When I was foreman of the San Miguel County grand jury and exposed the blatant fraud in that corrupt system, you did respond and you published my material.  I am extremely perplexed that you are not willing to publish Constitutionally based methods that win each and every time in court and which methods would greatly advance the position of J.A.I.L. for all states and help your members win cases now.  Our methods work in New Mexico and can work anywhere, but only with those serious and patriotic Citizens who are willing to do the work and really want to win their cases and defeat this evil, corrupt system called American government, in ALL its forms.

 

            In reference to your article, we have a few comments that may reinforce your lawful positions.  In the first place, any stop or detention by government is an arrest.  Any time government stops or detains a Citizen, a complaint must have been made by a party injured by actions of the arrested Citizen.  If no complaint was made by an injured party, then the arrest is unlawful and unconstitutional.  All government officers are required to take oaths to support the Constitution, thus, by the actions of the fraud acting as officer, he/she, in making this arrest, without complaint, perjured his oath, violated the Constitution and powers and Rights guaranteed therein to American Citizens.  Thus, pursuant to the 14^th Amendment, and the self-executing Sections 3 and 4, the fraud and imposter acting as officer immediately vacated his office upon his criminal actions, and is entitled to no benefits of his former office, including salary and pension.  This action extends to the customs and practices of the entire police department in which the city/municipality is located and all its public officers.

 

            Further, most states, if not all, require all public officers, including police, to have, by law, surety bonds or faithful performance bonds, which assures the faithful performance of duty by the officer.  This has nothing to do with liability insurance.  The bond assures the state and its Citizens that the officer will perform his duties pursuant to his oath, and if he does not, when the bond is called, a monetary payment is made to either the state or the Citizen injured by the officer's actions.  However, be fully aware that most states do not abide by their own surety bond laws, thus they do not follow their own laws, yet hold the Citizens strictly to the “law”.  When states do not follow their own laws, that amounts to, including, but not limited to, fraud, with intent to deceive.  Most states also have laws that prohibit public funds from being expended on illegal government actions, yet this happens each and every day and it seems that very few people take any effective action to stop it.  We do.

 

            For those who may say, in spite of what is stated above, that the police have the right to stop Citizens from illegal driving activities, please be aware of the definition of “driving”, as defined in federal law, and adopted by many states.  Driving is defined as “driving a commercial motor vehicle”.  Most Citizens TRAVEL, not drive, in their own private automobiles or motor conveyances, and do not “drive” commercial motor vehicles.  A law must be valid to exist, and must exist to be enforced.  All laws created for the American People by congress, or any other body, must conform with the Bill of Rights, or those “laws” are invalid, unconstitutional, and without force or effect, whatsoever.  However, if you do not know and demand your Rights, you have none.  By the states using this definition of “driving”. then arresting and citing Citizens for driving “offenses”, etc., the states are either citing Citizens for alleged violations of laws which do not lawfully exist, or misapply existing law.  In either case, it is fraud, with intent to deceive the Public.  The states are converting Constitutional Rights into privileges, then regulating them, and incredibly, the Citizens allow it.

 

            Any action by government which begins as a violation of due process of law, or of the Fourth Amendment, or any powers of and Rights guaranteed in the Constitution to American Citizens, or fraud, deceit, with intent to defraud the People, is unconstitutional, unlawful, and such action brought by government to “court” and heard by that court furthers the criminal actions by government, condoned by the court.  Simply for the court to hear such actions demonstrates that the court, on its own, and pursuant to the oath of the presiding judge, is unconstitutional, devoid of due process of law, forfeits any perceived jurisdiction, and any rulings rendered are null and void, without force or effect, whatsoever, upon American Citizens.  Merely for the presiding imposter acting as “judge” to sit in such a court is treason.              

 

            Fraud abounds in the American judicial system, and a Citizen must be aware of it to protect himself.  If he is not, then he will lose.  Most People think of themselves as U. S. citizens, not American Citizens, and there is a major difference.  American Citizens have full Rights guaranteed in the Constitution, and U. S. citizens do not.  When an American Citizen goes to court and knows and demands his Rights, knows and points out the fraudulent nature of the court, challenges its jurisdiction, and the Constitutional duty of the fraud acting as judge, that Citizen is virtually assured of victory.  However, when the U. S, citizen goes to court, unaware of the reality of that court, he is virtually assured defeat.  For victory, the nature of the beast must be fully understood.

 

            As previously stated, what is not authorized in the Constitution is prohibited.  American Citizens, not U.S. citizens, are guaranteed trial by jury, not hearing by judge.  Any hearing by judge is unlawful and unconstitutional and operates in violation of due process and Constitutional Rights, including, but not limited to, unlawful and Constitutionally unauthorized usurpation of the power of the jury.  ALL courts in America are unconstitutional courts, including the supreme court, and operate as administrative, legislative, territorial or district courts which operate under Article I and/or IV, and not Article III.  Remember, if you do not know and demand your Rights, in America, you have none.  No court has proper jurisdiction to hear any case for the American Citizen.  However, if the Citizen does not challenge the court’s jurisdiction, and accepts it, then he is subject to the rules of that accepted jurisdiction, and he loses.  Of course, the whole process is deception, but if the Citizen accepts the deception, he is part of his own problem.  As Citizens, we must be fully aware of the entire fraud in all systems, public and private, and oppose all enemies, foreign and domestic.  The domestic enemy is virtually ALL government in ALL positions.  Unless and until we, as Americans, recognize and act on this reality, America will lose.

 

            Our methods lock in the courts to the Constitution, and our Motions require the presiding fraud acting as judge to support the Constitution, specifically, the Bill of Rights, or he commits treason, by his own ruling, on the public record.  Few “judges” are willing to do this.  We win before we ever get to the subject matter. 

 

            There is much, much more we could  say on the courts, but for the sake of brevity, we shall end here.  J.A.I.L. is not the only web site to which we have sent our methods, with the same non-response.  We have sent them to over 100 web sites claiming to be advocates for the People, which mostly complain of problems in court and government, but, who, apparently, are uninterested in methods that defeat government in court.  As many of you know, government has long established “opposition" to itself, and controls that opposition, for its own benefit, while you who support the opposition are, in fact, being controlled by that government you oppose.   

         Sincerely,

 

Jack and Margy Flynn, American Citizens  

jackmargyflynn@...             

---