Medical Doctor Testifies To

Life Without J.A.I.L.

 

It is no secret that J.A.I.L. has on board representation from every type of profession imaginable, including current and former judges as well as medical doctors. What follows is the testimony of a former medical doctor who has been with J.A.I.L. for quite some time, and is greatly respected as one of sound mind and judgment. He has sent to J.A.I.L. his testimony under his title, “It’s The Economy, Stupid!”

 

“It’s The Economy, Stupid”

By Lawrence Agee

Lcagee@...

 

Some people wonder what the heck is going on in America. They wonder how this great experiment in freedom and democracy could have gone so wrong. Homes are being foreclosed on in record numbers and people losing their jobs, while fat cats who drove their businesses into the ground are walking off with staggering bonuses. Why is this happening?

 

In order to understand the big picture, we must first look at the little picture. What is the real story behind the job losses? What is the real story behind the foreclosures? Is it a domino effect? If so, what is the first domino, and what can we, the people, do to correct this?

 

Two of the three branches of government have been stumbling over each other to “draft a solution” to this problem. The solution de jour is bailouts, i.e. government programs where the government prints money and gives it to various entities. The first chunk of money went to AIG and the banks to keep them out of bankruptcy. The second chunk of money went to the auto companies to keep them out of bankruptcy. Bank of America got a big slice of the pie. What did they do with the money? They acquired Merrill Lynch, assumed their massive debt, and Merrill Lynch paid out 4 billion to their executives. So the 

politicians, who say "were for the little guy" actually helped the fat cats get year-end bonuses. We all know what AIG did with their bailout money; they had a nice retreat to a spa. The auto companies flew in on their corporate jets to beg Congress for cash.

 

But what about the little guy? I'm talking about the little guy who can't get a job. Well, I am one of the little guys who can't get a job. I also had my house foreclosed on. So lets find out what happened to this one little guy, just as an example of the bigger picture. So here is a tiny bit of my story.

 

Ironically, Congress, the very same Congress that just passed the 820 billion dollar economic stimulus bill to "create jobs" is actually directly responsible for putting me out of work. And this is how they did it.

 

You would think that an American citizen, a graduate of an American medical school, would be able to find a job. There are plenty of foreign doctors out there who practice medicine in America. So why can they get jobs and how come I, an American doctor, can't? The reason is this: my name appears on a blacklist, a federal blacklist created by Congress about 20 years ago.

 

When this federal blacklist was created, the intention was to "weed out" all of the "bad doctors" and put their names on this list. It became common knowledge if your name was on this list, you were never going to work ever again. This is great news for the "general public" who will be protected from all these "bad doctors" out there.

 

So the fact that my name appears on this blacklist would indicate that I must be a "bad doctor" and I must be punished like a bad dog. One might assume I had multiple malpractice suits or multiple patient complaints. But this funny thing is, neither of these things is true. My name appears on this blacklist because someone who does not know me said I had PTSD. [Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder – a diagnoses of a high percentage of our military men returning from Iraq].

 

Now if it was true that I had PTSD, I would wonder why such a diagnosis would prevent someone from working, and why such information should ever appear in a government computer. But in reality, the person who said this about me, a secretary from a hospital I barely set foot in, lied. They just flat out lied.

 

Now you would think that if this information was a lie, that I could easily get it erased from my record. But this is not the way it is. Once my name appeared on this blacklist, fiction became fact, as if etched in stone. Guess what happened next? I was prosecuted just like I was a felon. Actually, I was treated much worse than a felon. A felon has the presumption of innocence, gets assigned a lawyer, and gets a fair trial before a jury of peers.

 

A doctor [however] enjoys the presumption of guilt, is not entitled to a lawyer, has no jury of peers and gets all the “benefits” of "administrative law" where hearsay (i.e. fiction) is  evidence.

 

I was prosecuted in two states simultaneously for PTSD (which, by the way isn't a crime). I was put on trial in two states. I had my license suspended in two states. I was fired from my job. I became unemployed.

 

You would think I could just "file an appeal" and get it all straightened out. I tried to hire a lawyer. One of them said "this is going to be very expensive" and wanted a $250,000 "retainer" before he would even look at my case. So, once again, I was forced to go the appeal alone.

 

My first effort to file an appeal was returned to me with the following words on the top of my papers "wrong court." This is all they said. No one would tell me what the "right court" was.

 

Eventually, I filed a lawsuit in the federal court in Sacramento. The lawyer for the California medical board immediately filed a "motion to dismiss." …. and my case was "thrown out." And that's where my life was left. Out of work. No job. No prospects. It was pretty easy for them to do this to me.

 

I tried to get a job somewhere doing something, but no one wanted to hire a "suspended doctor." It was as if I had the plague. I tried to get a volunteer job at a free clinic in Baja California. Even they didn't want me. The woman I spoke to only wanted to know "where are you currently licensed." When I tried to explain my situation, she laughed at me.

 

So overnight, I went from being in the top 1% of wage earners in America, to the bottom 1%. A doctor from India could work in America. A doctor from Iran could work in America. But I couldn't. …. I had no source of income, and no savings. The next thing to go was my retirement account. Of course, there are late fees and penalties. So that lasted a few years, now that is gone. Once the money is gone, the foreclosure process begins.

 

Finally, after 8 years of complaining, this "data bank" removed the false information from my record. However, this did nothing to remedy the 4 other "adverse action reports" that resulted from the first false report.

 

So now, here I am, involved in yet another lawsuit, still trying to clear my name from this blacklist. How many years will this one take? And of course, the government will file a "motion to dismiss" or a "failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted" or maybe the classic "res judicata" and my case will just go away. And I will still be unemployed.

 

And this is what is going on out there. In this case, Congress was not the solution. Congress created the problem when they created the blacklist. The courts are not there to correct the mistakes, they only seem concerned with keeping people like me out of court. The executive branch oversees this data bank. They have demonstrated zero motivation to fix this, even when it is 

glaringly obvious they made a grave error.

 

The three branches of government are tossing gobs of money (our money) at this employment and foreclosure problem. But they are failing to see the big picture. Congress created this blacklist. If it isn't working, then they can do away with it. They chose to ignore the problem. Furthermore, the courts can

fix the problem by allowing litigation to proceed without blocking our access.

 

Unless we can get into court, how can we fix this? The courts would rather dismiss us. The executive branch could see to it that such problems do not happen. They also ignore the issue. But no one is actually addressing the problem. They are borrowing money from taxpayers, transferring the money to fat 

cats to pay bonuses and little guys like me remain out of work and we lose our homes. This one problem could be fixed with the stroke of a pen and I could go back to work. It does not require money. It requires a change in their stupid policy.

 

Lawrence Agee, MD

Lcagee@...

 

 

Dog Bleeds To Death After
Microchip Implant
From Katherine Albrecht    2-3-9

http://www.rense.com/general84/dog.htm

 

 

 

Wake Up America!

Important February 11^th Notice

6801 Western Ave.

Buena Park (Orange County), California

 

People everywhere are expressing concern about the direction America is headed. It is unfortunate that it takes such a great disaster to get the attention of the American People. In 1996 J.A.I.L. stated exactly what would be happening to America, setting forth the “What,” but not the “When.”

 

To quote a few paragraphs published by J.A.I.L. then word for word:

 

“In reality, the entire middle-class is planned to be obliterated, including you who are influential reading this. It is predetermined you be financially gutted. Your business is to be slowly depleted through "unfortunate" circumstances of debt foreclosure, bankruptcy, bad decisions, unable to meet tax obligations, poor business, and legislative control of your business and private property.  ….

 

“Imagine for a moment the power of the Federal Reserve. They can shut down the housing market and cause all construction to cease with one phone call. They can just pick up the phone, place a call, and cause upheaval in the entire world market. They can send the stock market into a tailspin within minutes. They can bring about massive layoffs in all industries, or create a national depression at whim. They can do what no military power on earth can do, ruin the nation over the weekend and
never fire a shot.  ….

 

“Congressman Charles A. Lindberg rightly said, ‘Under the Federal Reserve Act panics are scientifically created; the present is the first scientifically created one, worked out as we figure a mathematical problem.’ They turn the economy off and on like a faucet, and manipulate the stock market to their ends. ….

 

“The Banker's Manifest of 1892, as quoted from the book Economic Pinch by Charles Lindberg, Sr. says, ‘When through the process of law, the common people have lost their homes, they will be more tractable and easily governed.... People without homes will not quarrel with their leaders.’ ”

 

*  *  *

Even now at this very moment we are being lied to through the media that America is facing a series of unfortunate circumstances that will take time from which to recover. But the truth is that these days were long in the planning.

 

The Federal Reserve Bankers do not ever plan to be repaid in “dollars” held by the American People. You see, Federal Reserve Notes are not what they are after, for they can have all the $100 Federal Reserve Notes printed they wish for at approximately 2½ cents each. What the Federal Reserve wants is solid assets such as foreclosed homes, farm lands, businesses, factories, machinery, ships, autos, etc. They don’t need your/their paper “money.” The sooner everyone runs out of “money” the sooner they can foreclose on everything. Virtually all world events are manipulated by these bankers to this end!

 

Let me cite you two Scriptures that establish this banker- principle. James 4:1-2, “From whence come wars and fightings among you? come they not hence, even of your lusts that war in your members? Ye lust, and have not: ye kill, and desire to have, and cannot obtain: ye fight and war, yet ye have not, because ye ask not.” Matt. 16:26, “For what is a man profited, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul?”

 

Thomas Jefferson said in 1802, “I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around the banks will deprive the people of all property until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered.”

 

We say we are concerned about terrorists both here and abroad, yet we “bail out” our greatest terrorists and place the Federal Reserve Bankers on staff to save us from certain economic collapse. What fools we are! No man can spend their way into economic recovery, or stimulate the economy by progressing further into debt. Wake up America! It is time to turn things around!

 

Join Us February 11, 2009

 

Key planners within the J.A.I.L. Organization are meeting on this date at Pastor Wiley Drake’s Church, 6801 Western Ave,  Buena Park, Orange County, CA. starting with introductions at 1 pm. Pastor Wiley's telephone number is (714) 865-8132 / (714) 522-7201. Mike Lerman is the organizer for this event, and may be contacted at visionpr@..., or by calling (714) 308-4011.

 

The plans are to conduct this meeting in an informal manner. If you believe you can be an asset to the objective of turning this county around, please come and be in attendance. We will be honored with the presence and participation of long-time New York JAILer and regular supporter, Joseph McNicholl, out here visiting. Our objective is to discuss how we can upset the apple cart planned for the certain doom and demise of our country. It is obvious that God is judging America, and I know that God has ordained J.A.I.L. as the remedy for our country.

 

There are two hot subjects that are certain to be raised front and center for discussion:

 

Number One: It is no secret that many lawsuits have been filed around the nation in both state and federal courts regarding Art. II, Sec. I, Clause 5, “No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President…” To date, all of the court challenges, including to the U.S. Supreme Court, have been dismissed or are awaiting decision. It appears there is a deliberate attempt by the courts to avoid facing this question of jurisdiction, yet such concern is growing exponentially. The Court has determined that no person has the right to challenge the qualification of a presidential candidate to office unless they too are a presidential candidate to the same office. Behold, the courts are now faced with a challenge from presidential candidates Alan Keys and Wiley Drake.

 

To those of you concerned with the question of what interest J.A.I.L. may have with this issue, let it be known that this question deals with whether we have a Constitution or not, inasmuch as the courts are ignoring the Supreme Law of this nation which is bringing forth much attention. If we have no Constitution, then it raises the question as to what the remedy is. We already know the only remedy is the passage of J.A.I.L. within this country. If J.A.I.L. (Judicial Accountability Initiative Law) wins anywhere, it wins everywhere, as there cannot exist an America that is “a little bit unconstitutional!”

 

Number Two: The Supreme Court of California is about to determine whether the People of California have jurisdiction to determine whether it is the People, and not the judges, who have the ultimate authority in California. The issue is known as Prop 8 passed by the People. The opposition is arguing in the courts that the People of California have no jurisdiction to vote for Prop 8. The judges are to “decide” whether they, as judges, are superior to the People and the Constitution. Obviously, this decision by the judges brings J.A.I.L. to the forefront of this controversy!

 

Hope to see you on February 11^th.

 

-Ron Branson

VictoryUSA@...

 

PS – It is ironic that just yesterday M. Dane Waters, chairman  of the National Organization of the Initiative & Referendum Institute contacted me. I wrote to him regarding our Feb. 11^th event inviting him to come and be a part of our plan, and to speak to us. At this time, his presence is unconfirmed, but his organization is now located on the campus of U.S.C., where I was invited to be in attendance during their relocation celebration.

 

 

 

Bracing For Your Economic Future

 

The "Stimulus Package" will prove to result in an economic disaster, and will actually make things very much worse than they are now. I recommend proceeding to set up barter exchanges among the JAILers, i.e. "I will give you a bushel basket of oranges for a bushel basket of your apples." But this barter system must provide for three-way trade, "I don't need apples for my oranges, I need an auto mechanic, but the mechanic does not want apples or oranges, he wants a carpenter.” This means, of course, will only provide you a tree to tie onto in a tornado, but is not the remedy.

 

The real remedy is passage of J.A.I.L. which will force the entire government system to deal in gold and silver coin per Art. I, Sec. 10, Clause 1 of the U.S. Constitution, to wit, "No state shall ... make any thing but gold and silver coin a tender in payment of debts..." 

 

I've been preaching the remedy for years, but the People fail to give heed to what I say concerning the coming judgment. I don't want to face the temptation of saying to all of you, "I told you so." It is urgent you heed my advice, and quickly.

 

What have you got to trade with J.AI.L in exchange for your future security and your freedom? Does your future freedom  have any value to you?

 

Believe me, I know what I am talking about, folks. Rest assured that God has set me a watchman on the wall to blow the trumpet of His means of deliverance, and His remedy is through J.A.I.L. just as was the ARK was in the days of Noah. When J.A.I.L. prevails anywhere in this country, I know People will look to me as the founder of J.A.I.L. to secure their future security, and the system shall not be able to resist my plans in lifting this country out of its quagmire, yea, not even the president of the United States, or even Congress. All you have to be concerned about is, “Can you all trust this character, Ron Branson.” Ron Branson addresses this concern and says, God’s way is the Only way, there shall be no alternative!  II Chronicles 7:14, “If my people, which are called by my name, shall humble themselves, and pray, and seek my face, and turn from their wicked ways; then will I hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin, and will heal their land.” Nehemiah 9:27, “[W]hen they cried unto thee, thou heardest them from heaven; and according to thy manifold mercies thou gavest them saviours, who saved them…”

 

- Ron Branson

VictoryUSA@...

 

Click here>    

http://finance.yahoo.com/tech-ticker/article/169781/Peter-Schiff-Stimulus-Bill-Will-Lead-to-%22Unmitigated-Disaster%22?tickers=%5Edji,%5Egspc,QQQQ,SPY,DIA,TLT,UDN

 

 

CA Judge Rules Defense of Marriage Act Unconstitutional

By Kathleen Gilbert

http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2009/feb/09021008.html

SACRAMENTO, California, February 10, 2009 (LifeSiteNews.com) - Two judges in California's 9th Circuit Court have ruled in two separate cases that the same-sex "spouse" of federal employees must be granted the same health benefits as a heterosexual spouse, in spite of federal law to the contrary. One judge declared the federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) unconstitutional.

Judge Stephen Reinhardt ruled last week that Tony Sears, who "married" deputy federal public defender Brad Levenson in July, was being unfairly and unconstitutionally discriminated against by current federal law, which does not recognize a homosexual partner as a claimant to spousal benefits.

The denial of such benefits "cannot be justified simply by a distaste for or disapproval of same-sex marriage or … to discourage exercising a legal right afforded them by the state," wrote Reinhardt, who ordered Sears to be enrolled in the federal spousal insurance program. 

In another 9th Circuit decision last month, Chief Judge Alex Kozinski granted benefits to the same-sex "spouse" of a staff attorney for the court, but did not invoke the constitution. 

The Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), which was passed in 1996, states that marriage is recognized as only the union of one man and one woman for federal law purposes. It also says that states cannot be forced to recognize an out-of-state same-sex union.  Reinhardt is the first U.S. judge to openly state that DOMA is unconstitutional.

Judge Reinhardt, whom the Liberty Counsel identified as "the most reversed judge on the most reversed federal court of appeals," has earned a reputation as one of the most left-winged activist judges in the U.S.  Reinhardt is the same judge who in 2005 ruled that the Pledge of Allegiance was unconstitutional because it contained the phrase "one nation, under God." 

"The American people have had their fill of activist judges. Activist judges make a mockery of the law and bring disrespect to the judicial process," said Mathew D. Staver, Founder of Liberty Counsel and Dean of Liberty University School of Law, last Friday. 

"An opinion of an activist judge based on nothing else than his personal bias is no law at all and commands no respect. As the Founding Fathers would say, such a ruling is no law at all, and is as if it had never happened."

Erik Zimmerman, staff counsel of the American Center for Law and Justice, told the Christian Broadcasting Network that he doubted Reinhardt's case would go far in the courts, but was "more of a preview of what could come."

"This particular opinion should not have much wide-ranging impact across the country - it certainly signals that there could be a trend in the future of judges following this judge's lead and striking down the Defense of Marriage Act," he said.

The two rulings, however, are reportedly not considered as precedent for future California court decisions as they involved internal disputes within the federal judiciary, rather than actual lawsuits.

 

Pa. judges accused of jailing kids for cash

By MICHAEL RUBINKAM and MARYCLAIRE DALE, Associated Press Writers Michael Rubinkam And Maryclaire Dale, Associated Press Writers – Wed Feb 11, 2009

 

AP – Kurt Kruger, who spent three days in juvenile detention and another four months at a youth wilderness …

 

Slideshow:Judges accused of taking payoffs to jail kids

WILKES-BARRE, Pa. – For years, the juvenile court system in Wilkes-Barre operated like a conveyor belt: Youngsters were brought before judges without a lawyer, given hearings that lasted only a minute or two, and then sent off to juvenile prison for months for minor offenses.

The explanation, prosecutors say, was corruption on the bench.

In one of the most shocking cases of courtroom graft on record, two Pennsylvania judges have been charged with taking millions of dollars in kickbacks to send teenagers to two privately run youth detention centers.

"I've never encountered, and I don't think that we will in our lifetimes, a case where literally thousands of kids' lives were just tossed aside in order for a couple of judges to make some money," said Marsha Levick, an attorney with the Philadelphia-based Juvenile Law Center, which is representing hundreds of youths sentenced in Wilkes-Barre.

Prosecutors say Luzerne County Judges Mark Ciavarella and Michael Conahan took $2.6 million in payoffs to put juvenile offenders in lockups run by PA Child Care LLC and a sister company, Western PA Child Care LLC. The judges were charged on Jan. 26 and removed from the bench by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court shortly afterward.

No company officials have been charged, but the investigation is still going on.

 

The high court, meanwhile, is looking into whether hundreds or even thousands of sentences should be overturned and the juveniles' records expunged.

 

Among the offenders were teenagers who were locked up for months for stealing loose change from cars, writing a prank note and possessing drug paraphernalia. Many had never been in trouble before. Some were imprisoned even after probation officers recommended against it.

Many appeared without lawyers, despite the U.S. Supreme Court's landmark 1967 ruling that children have a constitutional right to counsel.

The judges are scheduled to plead guilty to fraud Thursday in federal court. Their plea agreements call for sentences of more than seven years behind bars.

 

Ciavarella, 58, who presided over Luzerne County's juvenile court for 12 years, acknowledged last week in a letter to his former colleagues, "I have disgraced my judgeship. My actions have destroyed everything I worked to accomplish and I have only myself to blame." Ciavarella, though, has denied he got kickbacks for sending youths to prison.

Conahan, 56, has remained silent about the case.

Many Pennsylvania counties contract with privately run juvenile detention centers, paying them either a fixed overall fee or a certain amount per youth, per day.

 

In Luzerne County, prosecutors say, Conahan shut down the county-run juvenile prison in 2002 and helped the two companies secure rich contracts worth tens of millions of dollars, at least some of that dependent on how many juveniles were locked up.

 

One of the contracts — a 20-year agreement with PA Child Care worth an estimated $58 million — was later canceled by the county as exorbitant.

The judges are accused of taking payoffs between 2003 and 2006.

Robert J. Powell co-owned PA Child Care and Western PA Child Care until June. His attorney, Mark Sheppard, said his client was the victim of an extortion scheme.

 

"Bob Powell never solicited a nickel from these judges and really was a victim of their demands," he said. "These judges made it very plain to Mr. Powell that he was going to be required to pay certain monies."

For years, youth advocacy groups complained that Ciavarella was ridiculously harsh and ran roughshod over youngsters' constitutional rights. Ciavarella sent a quarter of his juvenile defendants to detention centers from 2002 to 2006, compared with a statewide rate of one in 10.

 

The criminal charges confirmed the advocacy groups' worst suspicions and have called into question all the sentences he pronounced.

Hillary Transue did not have an attorney, nor was she told of her right to one, when she appeared in Ciavarella's courtroom in 2007 for building a MySpace page that lampooned her assistant principal.

 

Her mother, Laurene Transue, worked for 16 years in the child services department of another county and said she was certain Hillary would get a slap on the wrist. Instead, Ciavarella sentenced her to three months; she got out after a month, with help from a lawyer.

"I felt so disgraced for a while, like, what do people think of me now?" said Hillary, now 17 and a high school senior who plans to become an English teacher.

 

Laurene Transue said Ciavarella "was playing God. And not only was he doing that, he was getting money for it. He was betraying the trust put in him to do what is best for children."

 

Kurt Kruger, now 22, had never been in trouble with the law until the day police accused him of acting as a lookout while his friend shoplifted less than $200 worth of DVDs from Wal-Mart. He said he didn't know his friend was going to steal anything.

 

Kruger pleaded guilty before Ciavarella and spent three days in a company-run juvenile detention center, plus four months at a youth wilderness camp run by a different operator.

 

"Never in a million years did I think that I would actually get sent away. I was completely destroyed," said Kruger, who later dropped out of school. He said he wants to get his record expunged, earn his high school equivalency diploma and go to college.

 

"I got a raw deal, and yeah, it's not fair," he said, "but now it's 100 times bigger than me."

 

Sent by JAIL4Judges.org

VictoryUSA@...

 

 

Bay State's top jurist says courts are in crisis

SJC's Marshall warns of 'painful choices'

 

 

 

"A perfect storm of circumstances threatens much of what we know, or think we know, about our American system of justice," said Margaret H. Marshall, Chief Justice of the Supreme Judicial Court. (Pat Greenhouse/Globe Staff/File)

 

By Megan Woolhouse

Globe Staff / February 17, 2009

 

http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/articles/2009/02/17/bay_states_top_jurist_says_courts_are_in_crisis/

The economic downturn could have a devastating impact on the American justice system as courts are forced to lay off employees and cut down on court hours, Massachusetts' top judge said yesterday. I shall be blunt: Our state courts are in crisis," Supreme Judicial Court Chief Justice Margaret H. Marshall told members of the American Bar Association at its midyear meeting at the Hynes Veterans Memorial Convention Center. "A perfect storm of circumstances threatens much of what we know, or think we know, about our American system of justice."

Marshall said courts across the country are reviewing their budgets and making "painful choices."

New Hampshire's judicial branch will halt civil and criminal jury trials for a month to save on per diem payments to jurors. It will also postpone filling seven of the state's 59 vacant judgeships this year. Budget cuts in Florida have left 280 court employees without jobs and more layoffs are expected. In Maine, the courts have loosened security, no longer staffing magnetic security machine checkpoints at local courthouses.

Governor Deval Patrick has proposed a $560 million Massachusetts court trial budget, a 7.5 percent reduction to its fiscal 2009 budget of $583 million, according to Joan Kenney, a spokeswoman for the Supreme Judicial Court. The state's trial court employs more than 7,500 people, including 379 judges. Those cuts do not affect the Supreme Judicial Court or the state appeals court staff.

Jake Wark, a spokesman for the Suffolk district attorney's office, said the budget plan has left many court employees in his district, which covers Greater Boston, bracing for possible layoffs.

"Our budget is 90 percent or more payroll and rent. We've run a very lean operation for years, but it's hard to see how we can get much leaner," Wark said yesterday.

Proposed cuts "will basically put us back to 2001 [staffing] levels," he said.

The cuts come just as the state had made acclaimed changes to the system. The overhaul was five years in the making, and came after a blue ribbon commission said the state's court system was failing the public. The system improved efficiency, analyzing staffing and tracking how long it took to resolve cases. A system of evaluating judges, done by lawyers, court employees, and jurors, was put in place.

The overhaul helped shrink the number of unresolved cases from 177,000 in 2006 to 73,500 in 2008. The National Center for State Courts in Williamsburg, Va., honored Robert A. Mulligan, who oversaw the reforms as chief justice of administration and management, with the 2008 Distinguished Service Award for his efforts.

Valerie A. Yarashus, president-elect of the Massachusetts Bar Association, said yesterday that the proposed cuts will present the courts with new challenges.

Courts may have to close civil or criminal sessions or consider consolidating. Those changes could reverberate through the system, she said, slowing the courts down again.

"What's particularly frustrating is that the court has worked so hard, particularly in the last five years, to make progress on the backlog," she said. "We want to be really careful . . . not to undo that."

In a statement issued jointly with Mulligan in January, Marshall said the courts "must apply close attention and diligence to the collection of revenues for probation supervision and filing fees."

And she noted that about half the state's courthouses are staffed at "below minimal levels" as determined by an objective national staffing model. Marshall said the Massachusetts trial court cut $22 million from its current budget last fall at the governor's request.

Marshall did not speak specifically yesterday about Massachusetts' planned cutbacks, but she implored the lawyers in attendance to press political leaders for funding.

"Where do the legal meanings of such elemental concepts as 'birth,' 'death,' and 'family' take shape?" she asked. "Largely in state courts. State courts decide whether the tenant must vacate, whether the criminal defendant was properly charged, who gets custody of the children, who complies with zoning laws, whether the worker is entitled to compensation, or an injured patient to recover from her doctor."

She quoted legal scholar Reginald Heber Smith, calling the denial of justice "the shortcut to anarchy."

"These are words that resonate deeply with me," she said.

© Copyright 2009 Globe Newspaper Company.

 

 

 

“[S]timulate the working class to buy more and more of expensive goods, houses and technology, pushing them to take more and more expensive credits, until their debt becomes unbearable. The unpaid debt will lead to bankruptcy of banks, which will have to be nationalized, and the State will have to take the road which will eventually lead to communism."

 

                                           -- (Karl Marx, /Das Kapital/, 1867)

 

Obama:  “America exists on credit.”

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Kit Carson [mailto:ceo@...]
Sent: Sunday, March 01, 2009 7:06 AM
To: JAIL4Judges

Forming Common Law Grand Juries in Each State

 

Dear Sir,                                                                                        

 

Thank you for the letter to Ron Branson.  I have known Ron for many, many years: probably the most honorable man I know.

 

I have traveled down many of the similar roads as Ron has gone down (meaning law, judges complaints, lawsuits, etc.)  I hve been to court at least 300 time over my 50 years in business, I can complete with any lawyer, but I am only a lowly paralegal and Constitutional scholar.

 

I hate to say this: but our Constitution gone, the Feds and the state goverments are out of control and rule us with guns, judges annd threats. All grand juries have dissappeared or been completely emasculated.

 

These are the days that try men's souls?  Which men?  No humans in America are real patriots, duly informed on basic law, have no guts, believe the Feds rule us and their souls are not tried.  HOWEVER, there are a few groups.....very few groups (like Vietnam Vets, Hells Angels militia guys, ) that have guts, but no real political power.

 

This is what they should do in each State Incorporate the name People's Grand Jury and set it up as they see fit....six men and one foreman.  While they become busy and begin to issue indictments/true bills against judges, lawyers, county clerks, police etc. ... they can walk in embarrassment as the press, TV and the establishment laff there assess off at these seven silly men of the grand jury.  These seven men do not use their real names!  In their secret org. they record their real names as well as a . k. a....s

 

Remember, grand juries are secret meetings.  In secrecy; these seven men recruit at least 300 militia men, who take a secret blood oath to defend their state constitutiions, and they form a legal and deadly (secret militia).  They create a real jail on one of the member's rural land;  said jail could be a barn, a garage, basement or cellar or any emply old cargo van.

 

Next step;  indicted criminals are targeted for arrest and incarceration.   The militia ( Vets, or Angels) should trap and capture a few traitors on one weekend.  Lock and load boys: this would be for real....shoot and kill any effort to attack the GrandJuryMilitia.  Very high profile arrests need to be made: Attorney General, City Attorney, at least one out of control judge and for sure, one judgde from the tribunal called "Traffic Court." Maybe even the Governor?  All are incarcerated in the secret rural jail over one weekend.

 

THIS IS WHAT THE SECOND AMENDMENT IS FOR ... WE THE PEOPLE!

 

Reality:  I cannot locate seven good men in my state to form a Citizens Grand Jury.  I have located three (besides me) and one militia man is "too busy with his retail store," and cannot participate ... but he did contribute much talk and 10 "atta-boys."

 

The Republic is gone, and will suffer the same fate as the USSR.  Really!  This is the way of the world; what actually transcends in century after century.  Most of us alive today, will see the implosion and self destruction of USA.

 

The only way I'll lock and load, is ..."if the unemployed marauding hordes come to get my food and car, or the uniformed gestapo are on my porch screaming orders at me."   I pray this will never happen.  Remember the Watts riots?  How about Katrina riots?  Our economy/our currency

destruction is what will set off food and gas shortages and immediate riots all over USA..................Hell is comin' to breakfast, in our lifetimes!

 

John Hancock - out in the rocky mountains.

 

 

Forming Common Law

Grand Juries in Each State

By Joseph McNicholl - josephmcnicholl@...

 

Hi Ron, the gall that the Lawyers/Attorneys, who wear Black Robes and who call themselves judges, have in a Country where ALL Authority for these very people, the judges, to function comes from, the Sovereign!!!!!

 

Nowhere in the Constitution are the words Lawyer or Attorney to be found, yet 'We the People' are in their BAR 'Legal' system?????? How does a Sovereign become 'subject' to the State supreme court justices?  Through deception or Stupidity, or both????  To even think that they are Superior to us, especially, when we are formed as a JURY to make sure another Sovereigns [the source of authority] Birth RIGHTS are NOT violated or Infringed on, is SHAMEFUL!!!!!!!  The JURY is the Highest part of Self Government, which is us, the Sovereign Natural born Citizens, who can prove they were born in a UNION State and therefor, in SELF Government SUPERIOR to what 'We the People' Created, by us  Delegating some of Our EQUAL Authority!!!!!!!! 

 

Here is the very definition of USURPERS!!!!! Let us start charging them with perjury [Lying to the JURY] and the proof is their Oath of Office which they Consent to, by signing that Oath!!!!!!!  Where is the delegated authority for the supreme court to be SUPERIOR over the JURY? There is NONE because that would be a Mockery to government OF, BY and FOR the People who created it!!!!!! That's like you giving the Rope to somebody who wants to hang you, NO ??? All authority to be governed, is by the Sovereigns Delegating limited Authority to a civil servant/government worker and they take an Oath to obey that limited authority!!!!!! 

 

There was ONLY one reason for the People of the former Colonies, now joined in a Perpetual UNION through the Articles of Confederation, to Institute Self Government and that is to make sure our Birth RIGHTS are Protected by an agreement called the Constitution which is a Delegation order to those who take an Oath to OBEY it!!!!!

 

Joseph McNicholl

josephmcnicholl@...  

 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Joseph, as you know, you are preaching to the choir. The root of the problem lies with the question of to who do we "charge" these people with perjury? Yes, we are the sovereign, but they contend such is true provided "they" give us permission to be the sovereigns. This, of course, is the very reason why we need to pass J.A.I.L. by State Initiative.

 

Article II of our California State Constitution, like Article VII of South Dakota's Constitution, spells out, "All political power is inherent in the people. Government is instituted for their protection, security, and benefit, and they have the right to alter or reform it when the public good may require." The power of the People could not be clearer. Yet, if the 2006 South Dakota election has any meaning, the People do not want to be the sovereigns. They would rather trust in the establishment to be their sovereigns, and to reign over the People's created Common Law Grand Juries.

 

Just getting J.A.I.L. on the ballot anywhere sends the system in total disarray and fear that the People might "recall" their power as sovereigns. The entire nation would go into upheaval if J.A.I.L. were to get on the ballot here in California, I can assure it!

 

-Ron

 

  ______________________________________________

 

  From: joseph mcnicholl [mailto:josephmcnicholl@...]

  Sent: Sunday, November 02, 2008 12:29 PM

  To: JAIL4Judges

  Subject: RE: Forming a Common Law Grand Jury in each State

 

Hi Ron,  You know I support you in more ways than just send a few FRN's every now and then!!!!!  But, as we have learned from past battles with these Usurpers, we have to come up with maybe a different attack or approach????? 

 

How can we get more patriots involved with JAIL? The problem is they have us attacking everything, but the jugular vein, the Federal reserve bank!!!!!!!!  If you could clearly show to people that passing JAIL would get rid of the BANKSTERS then JAIL would pass!!!!!!   If Barack Obama were on our side, with his oratorical skill, we would get it done licitly split!!!!!!!

 

------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Joseph, now we are getting to the heart of the matter. I think we are here dealing with a spiritual matter, that of spiritual ignorance, "My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge: because thou hast rejected knowledge, I will also reject thee, that thou shalt be no priest to me: seeing thou hast forgotten the law of thy God, I will also forget thy children." Hosea 4:6, and "The prophets prophesy falsely, and the priests bear rule by their means; and my people love to have it so: and what will ye do in the end thereof?" Jeremiah 5:31.

 

So the question turns on "How do we get the People to covet the truth and pursue it above all else?" II Timothy 3:7 says that the People are "Ever learning, and never able to come to the knowledge of the truth." In all the years I have been enjoined with the Patriot Movement, I have never seen them able to focus on anything. They remind me of one jumping on a stationary bike and furiously peddling away sweating and panting but going nowhere. I am sure it will not surprise you if I tell you that God has given me a unique calling as "Noah" in these last days to provide them a genuine offer of escape if they have ears to hear and eyes to see, and a heart to receive the truth. Should they reject it, I know that God will certainly call upon me in that Day to be a judge against them. This is not something I look forward to, as my message is positive, but the truth must be told.

 

-Ron Branson

VictoryUSA@...

 

------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Joseph, a couple days ago I placed out the questioning of the Legislative Analyst regarding J.A.I.L. As you may recall, the questioning was that since Grand Juries throughout California are subject to Superior Court Judges, and the Commission on Judicial Performance are subject to the State Supreme Court Justices, to whom is the Special Grand Jury subject to? I answered No one. It would appear to me that were a Common Law Grand Jury created, the State of California would deem it either illegal or subject to the Supreme Court.

 

However, since J.A.I.L. is created by a Constitutional Amendment, it rises above all three branches of government, to which they have no acclaimed authority. Your comment?

 

-Ron

 

 

Chains You Can Believe In!

 

J.A.I.L. has been accurately proclaiming the truth regarding America since 1995, but very few listen. We have precisely  foretold of these days we are now enduring with the following words;

 

“The subject matter you are about to read is of utmost importance, … inasmuch as it deals with a national emergency involving you and the future of your children and grandchildren. Whether you find it difficult to grasp or understand makes it of no less importance. This message is directed toward middle-class America, the wealthy, and to all who have ears to hear. ….

 

Imagine for a moment the power of the Federal Reserve. They can shut down the housing market and cause all construction to cease with one phone call. They can just pick up the phone, place a call, and cause upheaval in the entire world market. They can send the stock market into a tailspin within minutes. They can bring about massive layoffs in all industries, or create a national depression at whim. They can do what no military power on earth can do, ruin the nation over the weekend and never fire a shot.” (J.A.I.L. 1996)

 

These very exact same words could have been published last month rather than in 1996 when I first published them. But nonetheless, what has been done in preparation for our warning? I can pretty well faithfully say NOTHING. And yet, the message of J.A.I.L. today is just the same as it was back then, i.e. the passage of J.A.I.L.

 

Turning America around is quite easy, but the People are still “Ever learning, and never able to come to the knowledge of the truth.” II Timothy 3:7. The People have employed a thousand and one ideas, but they still have not found the answer, and they shall not find the answer because they refuse to hear. I have even been told, “I don’t know what the answer is, but the one thing I do know is that it is not J.A.I.L.”  J.A.I.L. has been like unto the chief corner stone which the builder’s rejected. People have other ideas they yet “have to try!”

 

I have entitled this email, “Chains You Can Believe In,” but perhaps some of you would rather hear my “I Have a Dream,” presentation. Believe me, it does not present a pretty picture of the future of America. It differs considerably from the message of Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke who is even now stating that our current demise will reverse itself by the end of 2009. His message reminds me of the false prophets of old who foretold kings of more prosperous days ahead.

 

Now let me tell you the truth! The future deliverance of America depends upon the outcome of J.A.I.L. I was recently mocked for stating this, but I am unmoved, for the truth is the truth which cannot be altered!

 

I am compelled by our J.A.I.L. Constitution & By-Laws http://www.jail4judges.org/goals/implementation/ByLaws.htm  to tell you accordingly;

 

J.A.I.L. hereby imposes a National J.A.I.L. semi-annual financial support of ten ($10) dollars on each and every JAILer payable during the months of March and September of each year. Such support shall be made payable to "J.A.I.L." and sent to:

 

P.O. Box 207, No. Hollywood, Ca. 91603.  *

 

* Comments:

 

   Thomas Paine said in 1777, "Those who expect to reap the blessing of freedom must, like men, undergo the fatigue of supporting it." Should we expect to achieve Victory in America without supporting it, we seek something that has never been, nor ever shall be. From the Founder's personal viewpoint, J.A.I.L. is a cause certainly worthy of at least 5% of their gain to which God has entrusted them.

 

Notwithstanding this fact, it is hoped that this miniscule amount of ten dollars will inspire all JAILers to donate more than the minimum $10 according as they have been blessed by J.A.I.L.'s outreach. J.A.I.L. is the hope of the future of this nation, and certainly worthy of your financial support!

 

Pray for the future of America.

 

God bless those of you who seek God’s face in these evil times.

 

-Ron Branson

VictoryUSA@...

J.A.I.L. News Journal
Judicial  Accountability  Initiative  Law

______________________________________________________
Los Angeles, CA                                                March 3, 2009

A Public Service Announcement to America

(To be removed from this PSA see instructions below)

______________________________________________________

The Battle Lines are Drawn:  J.A.I.L. versus The Foreign Power 

A Power Foreign to Our Constitution

Mission Statement      JNJ Library        Federal J.A.I.L.

FAQs              What?MeWarden?

 

South Dakota Seeks to Undermine The People’s

Initiative Process as a Result of JAIL4Judges

It is no secret that JAIL4Judges provided a real scare to the establishment in South Dakota by placing judicial accountability on the ballot in 2006. The legislature there chose to violate their State’s Constitution and their own criminal laws in order to thwart passage of the judicial accountability measure of their State’s judges to the Constitution these judges have sworn to uphold and defend.

The South Dakota Constitution Art. VI, §26 states, "Elections shall be free and equal, and no power, civil or military, shall at any time interfere to prevent the free exercise of the right of suffrage." [i.e., the right to vote.]

South Dakota criminal statutes provide, “Any person knowingly printing, publishing, or delivering to any voter of this state a document containing any purported constitutional amendment, question, law, or measure to be submitted to the voters at any election, in which such constitutional amendment, question, law, or measure is misstated, erroneously printed, or by which false or misleading information is given to the voters, is guilty of a Class 2 misdemeanor.”  Codified Law 12-13-16.

See www.SD-jail4judges.org which thoroughly documents this criminal ordeal of the Legislature in detail --a site they do not want you to see.

What the South Dakota Legislature is seeking to do is shorten the time in which the People may collect signatures, and impose a requirement that the People circulate the views [propaganda] of the State Attorney General with the measure. It is being advanced under the  guise of “improving” the ballot process, promoting “openness” and “honesty” about ballot issues, and barring out-of-state initiatives from coming into South Dakota, as if judicial accountability in South Dakota is foreign to South Dakota.

Everyone should be knowledgeable of what is going on regarding this news; however we are not permitted to quote the source of this information.  “…the AP News report may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without the prior written authority of The Associated Press.” The source’s author, with whom I have previously spoken by telephone, vigorously opposes J.A.I.L. and wants nothing to do with it other than to do whatever is necessary to see that it is defeated.

Without rewriting the information, we can tell you that the Bill  is South Dakota HB 1184 which has passed both the Senate and the House, and is now awaiting the signature of Gov. Mike Rounds.

Those familiar with the 2006 warfare in South Dakota (see www.SD-jail4judges.org to refresh your memory) know that it was that very written “explanation” of State Attorney General Larry Long that defrauded the entire election of  the J.A.I.L. Amendment (Amendment E). Attorney General Long misled all voters in South Dakota by claiming that “judges,” the sole subject of the Initiative, included juries, school boards, city councils, county commissions, etc. who could be thrown in jail for their decisions, the objective of which propaganda was to scare  jurors with imprisonment. Long also stated “The proposed amendment to the State Constitution would allow thirteen volunteers to expose these decision makers to fines and jail, and strip them of public insurance coverage and up to one-half of their retirement benefits, for making decisions which break rules defined by the volunteers.” 

J.A.I.L. was forced to sue Larry Long in court for his ridiculous interpretation, but since this case was going in front of the judges of South Dakota against whom the Initiative was directed, the judges upheld a view that their own attorney, Attorney General Larry Long that defends them, could describe the Initiative however he wished, including “The attorney general could have said with a straight face that the real purpose and effect of the proposed JAIL amendment is to destroy justice in South Dakota…” quoting from the judgment of Judge Max A. Gors. From there, the matter went to the S.D. Supreme Court who affirmed Judge Gors.

We recommend you read the well-written words addressed to  Chief Justice David Gilbertson, South Dakota Supreme Court, at www.sd-jail4judges.org/Gilbertson.htm.  

 

J.A.I.L. presents the following question: If it is indeed true that the People are the final authority regarding their government as stated in Art. VI, §26 of the South Dakota Constitution, to wit:  "All political power is inherent in the people, and all free government is founded on their authority, and is instituted for their equal protection and benefit, and they have the right in lawful and constituted methods to alter or reform their forms of government in such manner as they may think proper" then I ask, where is the mind of the People regarding their authority in fundamentally altering the powers of the People of South Dakota?

 

Has not the Legislature reopened the question presented by JAIL4Judges in 2006 and drawn a fresh battle line on whether they, the People, have the unquestionable and inherit right to decide for themselves their future destiny, and not government?

 

J.A.I.L. states that the “government” of South Dakota has now crossed a line by which the People must now stand up for their  right to “alter or reform their forms of government in such manner as they may think proper.” It is either that or collapse the “government” of South Dakota as a traitor to their supreme law, the Constitution and to the People!

 

 

J.A.I.L. (Judicial Accountability Initiative Law) www.jail4judges.org, has

been in existence for over 12 years, and is in all 50 states and several foreign countries.

To manage your email, place the word Subscribe or Unsubscribe

in 'subject' line and hit reply. Your request will be automatically & instantly

processed. (Note: Program will not permit re-subscribes once unsubscribed.)

 

Our Founding Fathers said, "...with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine

Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes, and

our sacred honor." Dec. of Independence. We are a ministry in great need of

your financial support. Donate to this vitally important work at;

"J.A.I.L."  P.O. Box 207, North Hollywood, CA 91603

 

J.A.I.L. is a unique addition to our Constitution heretofore unrealized.

JAIL is powerful! JAIL is dynamic! JAIL is America's ONLY hope!

 

E-Group sign on at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jail4judges/join

Visit our active flash - http://www.jail4judges.org/national_001.htm

 

*   *   *

He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to

our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his assent to

their acts of pretended legislation.    - Declaration of Independence
 
"..it does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless

minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds.."  - Samuel Adams
 
"There are a thousand hacking at the branches of evil to one who is

striking at the root."   -- Henry David Thoreau                     ><)))'>

 

 

JAILer Journal
Judicial  Accountability  Initiative  Law

March 9, 2009

 

Patriots Are Such Ignorant Folk

By Ron Branson – National J.A.I.L. CIC

 

“My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge: because thou

hast rejected knowledge, I will also reject thee…”  Hosea 4:6

 

I have been classified as a “patriot” since the end of the 1970s, and admit to having suffered the same ignorance then that I now see within the patriot movement, knowing only the arguments I am hearing today.

 

Back them I remember the patriots half-filling a 6,000 seat forum in Southern Califonria that addressed the very same taxing issues that now frustrate all the people today. That organizational group is now gone, and the attendees scattered all over the place. Yes, and from time to time, I still happen to meet some of these same people here and there who come up and greet me. (I have an unforgettable face).

 

I remember attending a seminar held in Orange County California around the year 1982 and meeting for their first time Congressman Ron Paul and Larry McDonald who both spoke to the audience. Ron Paul was doctor and a Libertarian, and Larry McDonald, a member of the Georgia State Medical Education Board, and a Democrat who also served as the second president of the John Birch Society. Shortly after my acquantance with Larry McDonald the plane on which he was a passenger, Korean Air Flight 007 was shot down by Soviet interceptors.

 

I became closely acquainted with A. J. Porth known as the original founder of what then became known as the “Second American Revolution.” Porth was ordered to give the money he owed to those who worked for him to the government, and he told the government that if they had a dispute with his workers that they should go to them and not enter him into their dispute. His stand landed him in prison back in 1964. Even his prison guards were highly impressed with his stand and principles. His Parole Officer said to him, “Mr. Porth, my hat is off to you and I highly respect you.”

 

Having witnessed what has come down the pike relating to the “patriot” movement over the years and noting that nothing has changed, I brought suit after suit against the government before the judges which cases took me up to the U.S. Supreme Court fourteen times learning that it was insanity to expect anything from the courts in the line of Redress of Grievances. Thereafter I created JAIL4Judges in 1995 and promoted it on the internet. I now have the attention of no less than six state Supreme Court Justices, and retired U.S. Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O’Connor, the latter of whom travels around the country castigating JAIL4Judges. California State Supreme Court Justice Ronald George states that I am out to “destroy the wonderful judicial system we have here in California.” JAIL4Judges has generated at least two million dollars’ worth of free negative national publicity, including the WSJ, CNN, and the Los Angeles Times as well as several legal newspapers such as The Daily Journal, the largest in the nation.

 

So what is my point? Just this week I was urged to attend a major California “patriot” demonstration entitled “Heads on a stick” which was broadcast on a popular radio station and covered by television news. Thousands there chanted, “Heads on a Stick!” repeatedly. I asked, “What does Heads on a Stick mean?” The response was, “Something we will never do.” I asked if this was planned as some kind of joke. If indeed these patriots are serious, show me some heads. I am from Missouri! Show Me! I heard nothing about judges, judicial corruption, or accountability thereof.

 

I hear on the internet the need to find a good leader. But these patriots would never recognize a “good leader” even if they could reach out and touch him. I distributed some 600 JAIL4Judges business cards. Someone who took the card asked me if I was a judge. I told him “No!” So he gave me back the card and walked away as if to express disappointment that I was not a judge.

 

I can tell you that at one patriot meeting someone pointed out to me the leader of a nationwide organization of whom most all of you have heard. I thought this would provide me a great opportunity for me to introduce myself to him as many belonging to that organization were also JAILers. As I walked up to him from his left side with my hand extended to him (he was looking forward), he never even turned his head to look at me, but aggressively said to me, “I know who your are!” I was shocked and stepped back, wondering if he had me confused with somebody else. So I tried another approach of telling him how many of his followers are also our followers, to which he again said, “I know who you are. You are making the judges angry and we want the judges to be our friends.” I said to myself, “WOW, he does know who I am, and apparently he is angry with me because I am upsetting the judges in this country.”  In other words, an enemy of the judges is an enemy of his, and he is a “patriot” leader. Never once did he ever turn his head to look at me.

 

Another noted patriot leader said of me, “I don’t know what the answer is, but the one thing I do know is that it isn’t JAIL4Judges!”

 

So here is what I perceive about the “patriot” movement. They seek for an appropriate leader among them who shall lead the charge, but a “Leader” they shall not find for they have no heart to the truth. Well spoken to Ezekiel the words, “Son of man, thou dwellest in the midst of a rebellious house, which have eyes to see, and see not; they have ears to hear, and hear not: for they are a rebellious house.” Ezekiel 12:2. Christ referred thereto in His Words, “For this people's heart is waxed gross, and their ears are dull of hearing, and their eyes they have closed; lest at any time they should see with their eyes and hear with their ears, and should understand with their heart, and should be converted, and I should heal them.” Matthew 13:15. They are a people “Ever learning, and never able to come to the knowledge of the truth.” II Timothy 3:7. They are full of ideas, but they totally lack focus! They have a zeal for action, but have no direction. They are “Sheeple” wandering without a shepherd, the blind leading the blind. When, oh when will they open their eyes and hear with their ears? And when will the truth penetrate their hearts?

 

-Ron Branson

VictoryUSA@...

 

 

J.A.I.L. (Judicial Accountability Initiative Law)www.jail4judges.org, has

been in existence for over 12 years, and is in all 50 states and several foreign countries.

Our Founding Fathers said, "...with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine

Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes, and

our sacred honor." Dec. of Independence. We are a ministry in great need of

your financial support. Donate to this vitally important work at;

"J.A.I.L."  P.O. Box 207, North Hollywood, CA 91603

 

J.A.I.L. is a unique addition to our Constitution heretofore unrealized.

JAIL is powerful! JAIL is dynamic! JAIL is America's ONLY hope!

 

E-Group sign on at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jail4judges/join

Visit our active flash - http://www.jail4judges.org/national_001.htm

 

*   *   *

He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to

our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his assent to

their acts of pretended legislation.    - Declaration of Independence
 
"..it does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless

minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds.."  - Samuel Adams
 
"There are a thousand hacking at the branches of evil to one who is

striking at the root."   -- Henry David Thoreau                     ><)))'>

 

 

 

Forwarded by

JAIL4Judges

VictoryUSA@...

 

“Why We Can Never Get Anything Done!”

By Kenneth Pangborn - Mississippi

 

On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 2:06 PM, Kenneth Pangborn, MS

pangborn@... wrote:

 

Hello Mr. Smith,

 

I simply try to keep it simple.  There will never be a massive gathering of advocate of father's rights on the same accord similar to activists as depicted by the Civil Rights Movement.  I can literally write a 10 thousand word paper explaining why this is so.  However, those with hidden agendas, hard headedness, overpowering wills, and loud mouths are creating diversions in order to only persist the problem.  If the problem is solved, folks will not have a platform or soapbox to boost the ego.  Some people's careers are simply focused on convincing you to pay $30 plus dollars per year and claim that they are fighting for us.   

 

Well, $30 times 5000 equals $150,0000.00.  5000 plus members is considered an under estimation.  One hundred grant is a nice paycheck, even by recession standards.  If these same folks doing, what most would consider "good", with that 100 grand then it will be all good.  As long a folk are profiting and/or profiteering, then viable solutions will continue to be avoided.  People like that are

committing crimes against society.  PLAIN AND SIMPLE.

 

Over the past 30 years I have answered this issue a thousand times. Our

movement- Father's Rights, Men's Rights movements have always been impotent.

It has had some really good men come along over the years. Charlie Metz,

Dick Doyle and others. From where I sit you are dead wrong about money being

the problem. Not even close. None of the guys I have seen have been in it

for the money. There isn't any. The problem is EGO. The movement is cures

with too many Chiefs and NO Indians. Everyone wants to be the GREAT LEADER.

 

The problem is narcissism. Men who need sycophant followers. Men who see

anyone else's accomplishments as a "THREAT" to their throne.  So the

movement since the 50's has been stagnant because it is locked in internecine warfare. The movement will remain a joke until men stop out nature to be so competitive and we can put aside attempts to be the Alpha Male. When more men can look at efforts like those of our British cousins, and support a GOOD IDEA that came from somebody else - THEN we'll have a chance. But as long as our GREAT LEADERS see the success of the others as a THREAT - we are doomed. Until we accept the need for UNITY we're all wasting our time. I gave up on the "MOVEMENT" over 20 years ago.  I have better things to do. I still support good ideas, and generally use the right to remain silent on ideas I am not thrilled with.  If it works, I'll be on the sidelines cheering. If it doesn't, I'll still be around to console the effort. Others can TEAR DOWN.

 

Kenneth Pangborn

pangborn@...

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Clive Boustred [mailto:clive@...]
Sent: Friday, March 27, 2009 5:14 PM
To: JAIL4Judges
Subject: RE: Patriots Are Such Ignorant Folk

 

Dear Ron,

 

I know who you are and you are an outstanding Patriot. It's just a dam pity

the people lack the balls to stand up and acknowledge the truth and stand

with you.  Take courage, there are people who highly respect you and your

work and effort.  My acclamation does not come from a lowly position. ….

 

Kindest regards,

 

Clive

Clive Boustred, Chairman Liberty For Life and CopperCards Associations

 

 

March 26, 2009

 

Patriots Are Such Ignorant Folk

By Ron Branson - National J.A.I.L. CIC

VictoryUSA@...

 

"My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge: because thou

hast rejected knowledge, I will also reject thee."  Hosea 4:6

 

I, Ron Branson, have been a "patriot" since the end of the 1970s, and admit

to having then suffered the same ignorance  I now see within the patriot

movement today.

 

I remember a patriot organization half-filling a 6,000 seat forum in

Southern Califonria that addressed the very same taxing issues that now

frustrate the people of today. That organization is now gone, and its

attendees scattered. Yes, and from time to time, I still happen to meet some

of these same people which greet me. (I have an unforgettable face).

 

I further remember attending a seminar in Orange County California around

the year 1982 and meeting for the first time Congressman Ron Paul and Larry

McDonald. Ron Paul was doctor and a Libertarian, and Larry McDonald, a

member of the Georgia State Medical Education Board, a Democrat who also

served as the second president after the founding of the John Birch Society.

Shortly after my acquantance with Larry McDonald his airliner, Korean Air

Flight 007, was shot down from airspace by Soviet interceptor jets.

 

I also became personally acquainted with A. J. Porth whose 1964 effort was

tabbed as the beginning of the so-called "Second American Revolution." A.J.

Porth was ordered to give the salary that belonged those who worked for his

company to the government. He told the powers-that-be that he had a moral

duty before God to fulfill his agreement with those he hired, and that if

they had a dispute with his labors they must go to them and resolve their

dispute. Because of his determination to faithfully obey God, he was thrown

in a padded cell in a prison and treated as an insane person. Even the

prison officials highly respected him for his dedication and Godly

principles. His assigned Parole Officer told him, "Mr. Porth, my hat is off

to you and I highly respect you."

 

Having witnessed what has come down the pike relating to the "patriot"

movement over the years and noting that nothing has changed, I brought suit

after suit before the judges which cases took me up to the U.S. Supreme

Court fourteen times which taught me that it was pure insanity to bring

anything before the judges expecting justice. 

 

Thereafter, having being called of God and moved upon to pen the words of

the J.A.I.L. Initiative, I obeyed.  The year was 1995. I asked the Lord,

since I had neither fame nor fortune, how was it possible to promote this to

the nation. He told me "Ron, you leave that to Me." I knew at that time that

God was providing a means to overturn the corruption in this nation, albeit,

the method was beyond my imagination. At that time I knew nothing about the

internet, nor was the internet popular.

 

God in His faithfulness is providing a bona fide way, through J.A.I.L., as a

means for this nation to escape tyranny. "There hath no temptation taken you

but such as is common to man: but God is faithful, who will not suffer you

to be tempted above that ye are able; but will with the temptation also make

a way to escape, that ye may be able to bear it." I Cor. 10:13. God has

promised that He will "keep thee from the hour of temptation, which shall

come upon all the world, to try them that dwell upon the earth." Rev. 3:10.

 

While it is manifest that God's judgment is sure, nonetheless, God, in order

to establish His judgment (Rom. 3:6), still provides a way of escape even

though it be the forestalling of the judgment, Proverbs 28:2, "For the

transgression of a land many are the princes thereof: but by a man of

understanding and knowledge the state thereof shall be prolonged." God

always sends forth His saviours, Nehemiah 9:27, "... when they cried unto

thee, thou heardest them from heaven; and according to thy manifold mercies

thou gavest them saviours, who saved them out of the hand of their enemies."

 

God is providing a means by which He will call this nation into account, and

through J.A.I.L. has already attracted the attention of no less than six

state Supreme Court Justices, and at least one U.S. Supreme Court Justice,

namely Sandra Day O'Connor. California State Supreme Court Justice Ronald

George states that J.A.I.L. is out to "destroy this wonderful judicial

system we have here in California." It has generated at least two million

dollars' of free negative advertisement, including WSJ, CNN, L.A. Times,

etc., as well as several legal newspapers such as The Daily Journal, the

largest in the nation.

 

So what is my point? Just recently I was urged to attend a major California

"patriot" demonstration entitled "Heads on a stick" which was broadcast over

the radio and covered by television news. Thousands were there chanting,

"Heads on a Stick!" "Heads on a Stick!" I asked, What does "Heads on a

Stick" mean? I was told, "Something that will never happen." I asked if this

was planned as some kind of joke. If indeed these patriots are serious, show

me some heads. I am from Missouri! Show Me! I heard nothing about judges,

judicial corruption, or accountability thereof.

 

I am hearing on the internet that we need to find a good leader. But these

patriots would never recognize a "good leader" even if they could reach out

and touch him. The only thing good that happened there was that it afforded

me the opportunity to distribute 600 JAIL4Judges business cards. Someone who

took the card asked me if I was a judge. I told him "No!" So he gave me back

the card and walked away. Americans, and even the patriots, are still

looking to the judges to be their saviour. I just shake my head in dismay at

the ignorance.

 

I can tell you that at a patriot meeting someone pointed out  the leader of

a nationwide organization that deals with juries. I thought this would

provide me a great opportunity  to introduce myself.  As I approached the

man from his left side with my hand extended (he didn't even turn his head

to look at me,) but aggressively said to me, "I know who your are!" I was

shocked and stepped back, wondering if he had me confused with somebody

else. So I tried another approach of telling him how many of his followers

are also  followers of J.A.I.L., to which before I could complete the

sentence again said, "I know who you are. You are making the judges angry

and we want the judges to be our friends." I said to myself, "WOW, he does

know who I am, and apparently he is angry with me because I am upsetting the

judges."  In other words, an enemy of the judges is an enemy of his, and he

is a "patriot" leader. Never once did he ever turn his head to look at me.

 

Another well-known patriot leader said of me, "I don't know what the answer

is, but this one thing I do know, it isn't JAIL4Judges!"

 

So here is my preception of the "patriot movement." They seek for what they

shall never find, i.e. an appropriate leader among them, because they have

no heart for the truth. Well spoken are the words to Ezekiel, "Son of man,

thou dwellest in the midst of a rebellious house, which have eyes to see,

and see not; they have ears to hear, and hear not: for they are a rebellious

house." Ezekiel 12:2. Christ referred thereto in His Words, "For this

people's heart is waxed gross, and their ears are dull of hearing, and their

eyes they have closed; lest at any time they should see with their eyes and

hear with their ears, and should understand with their heart, and should be

converted, and I should heal them." Matthew 13:15.

 

These are people who are "Ever learning, and never able to come to the

knowledge of the truth." II Timothy 3:7. They are full of ideas, but they're

totally devoid of discernment and indeed lack focus! They have a zeal for

action, but not according to knowledge. They are "Sheeple" wandering about

without a shepherd; they are the blind leading the blind.

 

I cry out, "When, oh when will they open their eyes and hear with their

ears? And when will they allow the truth to penetrate their hearts?"

 

-Ron Branson

We Haven’t Seen Anything Yet!

 

 

The real US financial crisis has yet to begin

 

Editorial Desk

http://www.nationmultimedia.com/  The Nation (Thailand)

Publication Date: 23-03-2009    

         

During his visit to London more than a week ago, Thai Prime Minister Abhisit

Vejjajiva got the impression from business people and investors there that the United States did not have enough political will to take on its banking crisis once and for all. They told Abhisit that if the US had recognized the total estimated losses of the banking system and come up with the money to plug the leaking hole, it would have restored confidence and set the stage for an economic recovery. This sounds plausible, but the whole point is how much of the losses of the US banking system can really be quantified. Is it US $30 trillion, US $50 trillion or more?

 

The size of the US financial bubble that has gone bust is so large that it is impossible to quantify the losses due to the lack of transparency. The US banks,

backed by the power of the Federal Reserve to issue paper currency without any limit, had over the past several decades gone global in raising money, issuing debts and all kinds of instruments in their proprietary trading and investment. They had several dozen times over-leveraged their capital. Wall Street and US banks' easy money, fuelled by a low interest-rate policy during the Greenspan era, created a bubble economy.

 

In fact, it is not totally correct to assume that the current problem can be traced back to the Greenspan era alone. The US has walked away from manufacturing since the 1970s and shifted its policy toward consumption and financial services, backed by its superpower status to issue paper currency. The dollar has been floated around the world to become the de facto medium of international transactions without presumably any cost.

 

The US consumers went on a consumption binge, enjoying one of the world's best

living standards. Wall Street executives made filthy bonuses every year. The Wall Street model has become the fixation of American business - how to make quick money from thin air.

 

But we all know that there is no free lunch. The dollar paper issued to the creditor institutions, funds and sovereign governments worldwide is now starting to backfire. The global economic imbalances, characterised by overconsumption in the US and overproduction by the emerging-market economies, including Japan, are now going through a correction.

 

US over-consumed by issuing debt to finance its consumption, while other countries re-channeled their reserves back to the US so that US consumers

would continue to buy their cheap goods. Now exports to the US have collapsed. Creditors are shying away from subscribing to US debt. They are cutting losses in their US dollar asset holdings.

 

The US banks have made things worse by offering easy lending to the real-estate sector. Real-estate loans were bundled as mortgage-backed securities, on top of

which other dubious financial products were created. This is not to mention other financial products that US banks have issued like currency only because they have their brand names attached. Currency and paper are treated without any difference. The bubble was in full swing until the sub-prime debacle hit the US in August 2007. After that the US financial system and the US economy started to go downhill.

 

The US banks and financial institutions have been relying on the Federal Reserve's

Temporary Auction Facility to raise their liquidity. They have been facing a run, with foreign depositors and scared individuals withdrawing their money. Without the Fed's intervention with liquidity, US banks and financial institutions would have been totally broken down by now.

 

But the worst has yet to come. With a loss of confidence in the US financial

system, creditors and investors are dumping dollar-denominated instruments.

They are willing to cut losses. The US banks, who issue the instruments, have to take their debts back. Since they do not have the liquidity because the credit market has already ground to a halt, they can only rely on the Federal Reserve. As a result, the balance sheet of the Federal Reserve will continue to balloon.

 

US Treasuries, traditionally recognized as risk free, are now under pressure. Russia,

China, India and other countries are discussing a possibility of dumping the US dollar as a reserve currency. They have proposed a return to the Special Drawing Rights issued by the International Monetary Fund.

 

In the meantime, the US federal government will find it tough to finance its deficit spending. Recent projects have put the deficit for 2009 at a record US $1.8 trillion. This would complicate President Obama's efforts to pass his US $3.55 trillion budget plan for 2010. The deficit would continue for several years to come. Where will this money come from?

 

The US won't be able to finance the deficit of this magnitude. The US Treasury

doesn't have any money. The Americans are also losing their savings and

investments in the meltdown of the stock market by at least 50 per cent last

year alone. They are also saddled with consumer and mortgage debt. So the US ends up with only two options left: Borrowing from the foreign creditors or resorting to the printing press.

 

Under the current condition, foreign creditors will be more cautious or unwilling to subscribe to US debt. They already have toxic financial instruments in the books of their banks more than they can handle. So the US has only one option left, which is to inflate away the debt by printing money. By doing so, the  US Treasury will issue bonds directly to the Federal Reserve, which will issue the money in return. The Treasury will use the money to meet its budget or other spending obligations.

 

This US money-printing, the Bank of England, the Swiss National Bank, the Bank of Japan, have warned is threatening hyperinflation afterward. The dollar will head for a decline. Once inflation is off and running, the printing press dollars will only have goods made in America to chase after. The real crisis has not yet begun.

 

 

ABC's 20/20: Jailing Kids for Cash?

 

Not long ago, J.A.I.L. placed out to its readership a printed story about “Jailing Kids For Cash.” This story has caused a public outrage that has now hit the national television media. 20/20 on ABC has shown a story on this on their 20/20 program, and trailers of this program may be seen as per below.

 

Attorney Gary Zerman of JAIL4Judges has placed out the following;

 

 

To All:

 

If you missed it, check out the below ABC 20/20 video re corrupt & dastardly juvenile court judges from Wilkes-Barre, PA. 

 

Note the claim about the "corruption of silence."  BUNK! Maybe a fraction is true, but the real truth is/was, many knew but were scared of the power the judges have.

 

Similar to the pedophile priests, even our CHILDREN are not safe with these guys.

 

And if you think it's just this case limited to Wiles-Barre, PA, you had better wake up.  This and similar corruption runn'n rampant.  It is manifest.

 

Thanks goes to Dr. Shirley Moore, who sent the link to me.

 

There is no one left to blame - but the judges/judiciary.

 

Attorney Gary Zerman

GZerman@...

 

_____________________________________________________________

 

 

20/20 VIDEO:

Jailing Kids for Cash

http://abcnews.go.com/2020

 

 

20/20 Headlines Article:

Judges Accused of Jailing Kids for Cash, by Frank Mastropolo

http://abcnews.go.com/2020/story?id=7178686&page=1

 

There are two places for comments.  The first is for additional facts on this case specifically.  To leave general comments or to thank ABC go to the bottom of the page and click View All Comments, and go to the bottom of that page to leave your comments.  Please request that they continue to expose family court corruption.

 

 

JAIL4Judges.org

VictoryUSA@...

 

-----Original Message-----
From: ned fairaday jr. [mailto:vizstim@...]
Sent: Monday, March 30, 2009 4:50 PM
To: JAIL4Judges
Subject: RE: ABC's 20/20: Jailing Kids for Cash

 

Sad to say these judges are from up here ... happy to say RON, you inspired us to cleanup the PA. courts. Blessings to you ... these judges are GOING TO JAIL!

 

Rev. Brian Thomas

 

ABC's 20/20: Jailing Kids for Cash

 

Not long ago, J.A.I.L. sent out to its readership a printed story about “Jailing Kids For Cash.” This story has caused a public outrage that has now hit the national

television media. 20/20 on ABC has shown a story on this on their 20/20 program,

and trailers of this program may be seen as per below.

 

20/20 VIDEO:

Jailing Kids for Cash

http://abcnews.go.com/2020  

 

 

20/20

Headlines Article: Judges Accused of Jailing Kids for Cash, by Frank Mastropolo

http://abcnews.go.com/2020/story?id=7178686&page=1  

 

 

JAILer Journal

 

Banks Starting to Walk Away on Foreclosures

 http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/30/us/30walkaway.html?pagewanted=1&_r=2&fta=y]

 

By SUSAN SAULNY

Published: March 29, 2009

SOUTH BEND, Ind. — Mercy James thought she had lost her rental property here to foreclosure. A date for a sheriff’s sale had been set, and notices about the foreclosure process were piling up in her mailbox.

Skip to next paragraph Ms. James had the tenants move out, and soon her white house at the corner of Thomas and Maple Streets fell into the hands of looters and vandals, and then, into disrepair. Dejected and broke, Ms. James said she salvaged but a lesson from her loss.

So imagine her surprise when the City of South Bend contacted her recently, demanding that she resume maintenance on the property. The sheriff’s sale had been canceled at the last minute, leaving the property title — and a world of trouble — in her name.

“I thought, ‘What kind of game is this?’ ” Ms. James, 41, said while picking at trash at the house, now so worthless the city plans to demolish it — another bill for which she will be liable.

City officials and housing advocates here and in cities as varied as Buffalo, Kansas City, Mo., and Jacksonville, Fla., say they are seeing an unsettling development: Banks are quietly declining to take possession of properties at the end of the foreclosure process, most often because the cost of the ordeal — from legal fees to maintenance — exceeds the diminishing value of the real estate.

The so-called bank walkaways rarely mean relief for the property owners, caught unaware months after the fact, and often mean additional financial burdens and bureaucratic headaches. Technically, they still owe on the mortgage, but as a practicality, rarely would a mortgage holder receive any more payments on the loan. The way mortgages are bundled and resold, it can be enormously time-consuming just trying to determine what company holds the loan on a property thought to be in foreclosure.

In Ms. James’s case, the company that was most recently servicing her loan is now defunct. Its parent company filed for bankruptcy and dissolved. And the original bank that sold her the loan said it could not find a record of it.

“It is what some of us think is the next wave of the crisis,” said Kermit Lind, a clinical professor at the Cleveland-Marshall College of Law and an expert on foreclosure law.

For older industrial cities like South Bend, hard times in the mortgage market began before the recent national downturn, as did the problem of bank walkaways. In the case of Ms. James, a home health care administrator, the foreclosure proceedings began in the summer of 2007, when she could not keep up with the adjustable rate on her mortgage.

In Buffalo, where officials said the problem had reached “epidemic” proportions in recent months, the city sued 37 banks last year, claiming they were responsible for the deterioration of at least 57 abandoned homes; the city chose a sampling of houses to include in the lawsuit, even though the banks had walked away from many more foreclosures. So far, five banks have settled.

In Kansas City, Rachel Foley, a lawyer who handles housing cases, said bank walkaways were “a rare occurrence two to three years ago.”

“We’re seeing them dumped more and more at the moment,” she said.

Experts suggest the bank walkaways are most visible in states where foreclosures are processed through the courts and therefore tend to be more transparent. Other states, like Indiana and New York, have court-mandated foreclosures, but roughly half of the states allow foreclosures to proceed without court intervention, making it difficult to accurately count the number of bank walkaways in recent months.

The soft housing market and the vandalism that often occurs when a house sits empty are the two main factors influencing the mortgage holders’ decisions to walk away, said Larry Rothenberg, a lawyer for Weltman, Weinberg & Reis, one of the larger creditors’ rights firms in the country.

“Oftentimes when the foreclosure starts out, it’s a viable property,” Mr. Rothenberg said, “but by the time it gets to a sheriff’s sale, it might not have enough value to justify further expense. We’ve always had cases where property was vandalized or lost value, but they were rare compared to these times.”

The problem seems most acute at the bottom of the market — houses that were inexpensive to begin with — and with investment properties, where investors and banks want speedy closure by writing off bad loans as losses. Banks and investors typically lose 40 percent to 50 percent of their investment on every foreclosure.

Skip to next paragraphGuy Cecala, publisher of Inside Mortgage Finance, an industry newsletter, said some properties had become such liabilities for investors that it was not even worth holding on to them to strip valuable fixtures, like kitchen appliances, toilets and hardware.

“The whole purpose of foreclosure is to take title of the property, sell it and recoup what money you can,” Mr. Cecala said. “It’s just a sign of the times that things are so bad no one wants to take possession of the property.”

In South Bend, boarded-up houses for whom no one has stepped forward are dotting the landscape, adding a fresh layer of blight to communities that were already scarred from the area’s industrial decline.

The city is hoping to create a new type of legal mediation process that would bring together the homeowners and the mortgage holders to settle their disputes while allowing the owners to remain in the home — considered crucial to any stabilization effort.

“I’d say in the last three or four months, we’ve seen dozens of these cases,” said Chuck Leone, the South Bend city attorney. “We see it one of two ways. One is that the bank will simply dismiss the foreclosure complaint. The other is that the mortgage holder will follow through and take a judgment of foreclosure, but then not schedule the property for sheriff’s sale.”

In Ms. James’s case, it has been impossible to determine who canceled the sheriff’s sale, since her last mortgage holder went out of business. Even the city clerk’s records did not provide an answer.

“Nobody has any idea who owns what or who’s responsible,” said Judy Fox, Ms. James’s lawyer at the Notre Dame Legal Aid Clinic. “It’s a very common story.”

Mayor Stephen J. Luecke of South Bend added: “It’s just a crime the way it puts people in limbo. They first off have gone through the grief of losing their house, then they move out and find out that they still own it and have responsibility for it.”

In Jacksonville, Fla., Sylvester Kimbrough Jr. found himself caught in the limbo between foreclosure and ownership last year, 10 years into his 30-year mortgage on a $42,000 two-bedroom house.

Mr. Kimbrough, 56, a former driver for a car dealership who is now unemployed, had already moved out when he learned that the foreclosure had been stopped.

“That move really almost destroyed us,” Mr. Kimbrough said. “It was all for nothing.”

 

 

Sent by:

.JAIL4Judges.org

P.O. Box 207

North Hollywood, CA. 91603

VictoryUSA@...

 

J.A.I.L. News Journal
Judicial  Accountability  Initiative  Law

______________________________________________________
Los Angeles, California                                        April 4, 2009

______________________________________________________

The Battle Lines are Drawn:  J.A.I.L. versus The Foreign Power 

A Power Foreign to Our Constitution

Mission Statement      JNJ Library        Federal J.A.I.L.

FAQs              What?MeWarden?

J.A.I.L. More Important

Than the Polio Vaccine

"The issue [judicial immunity] is as epic as the plague,

the outcome as important as the polio vaccine."

--Mark Guydish

 

 

 

Immunity claim really nothing to sneeze at

mguydish@...  

http://www.timesleader.com/opinion/columnists/guydish/Immunity_claim_really_nothing_to_sneeze_at_MARK_GUYDISH_OPINION_04-02-2009.html

Oh how I yearn to make medical treatment work the way justice does in the mind of disgraced former Judge Mark Ciavarella. Imagine the ability to declare immunity no matter what health problem you create.

Doctor: “Frankly, your reckless participation in contact sports has caused severe premature arthritic joints.”

Me: “Oh, don’t be silly, doctor, I’m immune to arthritis. Why else do you think I was so reckless?”

Doctor: “I see. Well, your heavy use of alcohol has resulted in cirrhosis.”

Me: “I’m immune to cirrhosis as well. I wouldn’t have kept drinking like a sot gone wild otherwise.”

Doctor: “Ummm … Really … and those clotted arteries from your horrendous diet of lard and milk shakes?”

Me: “Obviously I would never have indulged like that if I weren’t immune.”

Doctor: “And the hypertension from putting extra salt on the pound of potato chips you ate daily?”

Me: “I can’t have helped caused my own high blood pressure, I’m immune.”

Doctor: “So, you believe that, even if you deliberately abuse your health, you’re immune to consequences?”

Me: “Of course! If it works in a courtroom, why not in my own life?”

Ciavarella has become the man who admits guilt while denying wrongdoing. He’s our version of Hollywood’s Terminator: Every time you think he’s done and over with, he pops up acting like you barely scratched him.

His latest legal claim: Utter immunity from a civil lawsuit, even if his actions with children in juvenile court were done corruptly. It sounds outlandish. Unfortunately, while I’m certainly no expert in legal nuance, the cases he cites suggest he’s right.

It has worked before

Reading these things gets a little scary, if you thought no one is above the law in the U.S. For example, Ciavarella cites a 1978 U.S. Supreme Court case called Stump v. Sparkman. A mother petitioned an Indiana court to let her sterilize her “somewhat retarded daughter.” Without a hearing or telling the daughter, the judge agreed. The daughter was sterilized under the ruse of having an appendix removed. Later, when married and unable to have children, she learned the truth and sued. The Supreme Court decided the circuit judge had ruled within his jurisdiction and thus was immune from liability “even if his approval of the petition was in error.”

There’s another case involving a segregated bus terminal in Mississippi, but the main ruling bolstering Ciavarella is Bradley v. Fisher in 1871, which involved a man connected to the assassination of Abraham Lincoln. A judge and lawyer got into a bit of a spat. The judge ruled the lawyer’s name be stricken from rolls of attorneys authorized to practice before that court. The lawyer sued. The Supreme Court ruled, as Ciavarella’s paperwork notes, that judges aren’t liable even if their actions “are alleged to have been done maliciously or corruptly.”

Like I said, I’m no expert. But it’s interesting to note that Ciavarella’s paperwork, as well as rulings in the case he cites, talk about judicial immunity as “doctrine” and “established principal,” but not as black letter law or a Constitutional right.

It’s also worth noting that the Supreme Court justices made a strong case for such immunity in Bradley v. Fisher. I’m posting it on my blog at http://www.timesleader.com/. The suit filed against him, on the other hand, argues that his actions in juvenile court struck at the very heart of the Constitution. I’m eager to see it play out.

The issue is as epic as the plague, the outcome as important as the polio vaccine.

 

Posted: April 2

Officials mull suing two judges

 

Suit against disgraced pair depends, in part, on realistic possibility of recouping funds, county solicitor said.

 

By Jennifer Learn-Andes

jandes@...
Luzerne County Reporter

 

http://www.timesleader.com/news/hottopics/judges/Officials_mull_suing_two_judges_04-02-2009.html

Taxpayers are also victims in Luzerne County’s judicial corruption scandal, and county officials are exploring the possibility of a lawsuit to recoup damages.

County officials stress that they will only turn to litigation if there’s a solid legal argument and likelihood of obtaining money, especially if the county can’t find lawyers willing to take a suit on contingency.

County Solicitor Vito DeLuca said the administration has indicated it “doesn’t want to throw good money after bad.” Commissioners would have to vote before filing suit, he said.

One possible avenue is suing former judges Mark Ciavarella and Michael Conahan to recoup county funds spent on the placement and treatment of juveniles who will have their records erased by the state Supreme Court, DeLuca said.

Thousands of juveniles charged with certain minor offenses may fall into this category, in large part because they did not have legal representation when they appeared before Ciavarella.

“If these juveniles were detained unnecessarily and we paid to put them in placement, obviously taxpayers should recoup that money,” said Commissioner Chairwoman Maryanne Petrilla. “I think we should at least explore the possibility of recouping that money.”

DeLuca said more research is needed before pursuing this type of litigation because judges have immunity in acts performed as part of their duties.

This immunity doesn’t cover judges for acts performed off the bench, including administrative decisions, DeLuca said. That’s why another possibility is suing the former judges for conspiring to close the old county-owned detention center.

Conahan and Ciavarella are awaiting sentencing on guilty pleas for accepting $2.6 million in kickbacks in exchange for actions that led to the county’s use of privately-owned PA Child Care centers in Pittston Township and western Pennsylvania.

Shortly before the Pittston Township center’s opening in 2003, then-president judge Conahan announced that he would no longer send juveniles to the county-owned River Street detention center. Conahan stripped funding for the 16 county detention center workers from his budget and returned the county detention center license to the state, even though the state said the county-owned building met licensing requirements.

Minority Commissioner Stephen A. Urban supports this type of suit, noting that the federal complaint against Conahan also revealed that he signed a placement guarantee agreement in January 2002 saying the court would pay PA Child Care $1.314 million a year in rent and that these payments "shall be absolute and unconditional."

A suit could recover the additional money that had to be spent on detention as a result of the closure of the county’s River Street facility, Urban said.

DeLuca said the county may have a strong case pursuing damages caused by the closure of the old center.

“It would be a valid cause of action, assuming we could show that there was a conspiratorial action taken by one or more defendants to force the county to have to go out and find another facility,” DeLuca said.

DeLuca said taxpayers may also have to foot some of the bill for litigation now that the county has been added as a defendant in one of three lawsuits filed in connection with the scandal involving the two former judges.

The county’s liability insurance would cover legal representation and damages up to $1 million or $2 million, but the county would be responsible for a $50,000 deductible and damages beyond the cap, Urban said.

County officials plan to argue that the county has no liability because judges are supervised by the state Supreme Court. Commissioners have no supervisory control over the judges and their policies.

Because the state also covered much of the cost of detention and placement, DeLuca said he will consult with state agencies to determine if they’d want to enjoin a county suit.

The two former judges aren’t the only potential targets of a suit, though DeLuca declined to name other possibilities.

“One of the main focuses of my research is to try to determine all the parties that may be liable because the more parties we could determine are liable to the county, the more likely we’d be able to recover something,” DeLuca said.

Commissioners would seek a law firm willing to represent the county at little or no cost in exchange for a percentage of any damages obtained, DeLuca said. If no firms bite, commissioners would have to weigh the cost of litigation against the likely recovery, he said.

It’s difficult in Pennsylvania to enforce a judgment against one person when the assets are also in the name of that person’s spouse, he said.

“It’s not completely impossible, but it’s a very, very difficult process,” DeLuca said.

Thanks to Attorney Gary Zerman, gzerman@..., for sending the above.

PS – Along this line, Ron Branson, author of JAIL4Judges, received a call from two District Attorney Deputies from the County of Los Angeles regarding their filing a criminal complaint against two L.A. Superior Court judges whom they sought criminal prosecution. However, these defendant judges were being protected by other judges through the doctrine of judicial immunity. I told the District Attorney Deputies that there is no theory in law that judges are protected from criminal prosecution by judicial immunity. But, of course, this is precisely where things head when it is found acceptable by judges to cloth all judges with judicial immunity. “Know ye not that a little leaven leaveneth the whole lump?” I Corinthians 5:6. Indeed, if a select few are above the law, then all are above the law!

J.A.I.L. (Judicial Accountability Initiative Law)www.jail4judges.org 

To manage subscription, place the word Subscribe or Unsubscribe

in 'subject' line and hit reply. Your request will be automatically & instantly

processed. (Note: Program will not permit re-subscribes once unsubscribed.)

 

Our Founding Fathers said, "...with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine

Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes, and

our sacred honor." Declaration of Independence. We are a ministry in great need of your financial support. Send your donations for this vitally important work to:

J.A.I.L.  P.O. Box 207, North Hollywood, CA 91603

 

J.A.I.L. is a unique addition to our Constitution heretofore unrealized.

JAIL is powerful! JAIL is dynamic! JAIL is America's ONLY hope!

 

E-Group sign on at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jail4judges/join

Visit our active flash - http://www.jail4judges.org/national_001.htm

 

*   *   *

He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to

our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his assent to

their acts of pretended legislation.    - Declaration of Independence
 
"..it does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless

minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds.."  - Samuel Adams
 
"There are a thousand hacking at the branches of evil to one who is

striking at the root."   -- Henry David Thoreau                     ><)))'>

Judge$ Reigning A$ King$!

 

“In transgressing and lying against the LORD,

and departing away from our God, speaking

oppression and revolt, conceiving and uttering

from the heart words of falsehood.

And judgment is turned away backward,

and justice standeth afar off: for

truth is fallen in the street, and equity

cannot enter. Yea, truth faileth; and

he that departeth from evil maketh

himself a prey: and the LORD saw it, and

it displeased him that there was no judgment.”

 

While the County of Los Angeles is descending into the hole financially, and many employees are being laid off or cut back, the judges are flourishing, shoveling in their bonuses from the taxpayers, and racking up more “salary” than even the nine Justices of the United States Supreme Court.

 

“Be not thou afraid when one is made rich, when the glory of his house is increased;” Psalms 49:16. “For evildoers shall be cut off: but those that wait upon the LORD, they shall inherit the earth. For yet a little while, and the wicked shall not be: yea, thou shalt diligently consider his place, and it shall not be.” Psalms 37:9, 10.

Calif. Court Perks All Over the Map

http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1202429690020

Cheryl Miller
The Recorder
April 6, 2009

 

Faced with staggering budget cuts and multimillion-dollar cost overruns, California's judiciary leaders this spring will consider employee layoffs, furloughs and cutbacks to traditionally sacrosanct programs like courthouse security.

But for judges in 19 courts across the state, the scenario won't be nearly so bleak. Court executives there will dip into their operating budgets and spend a combined $3 million on judicial perks ranging from car allowances to family gym memberships.

And no matter how bad the judiciary's cash crunch grows, no one -- save a reluctant Legislature -- can strip away the judges' court-provided benefits.

It's the law.

Adopted amid a contentious, marathon budget-fixing session in February, Senate Bill 11XX authorized counties to continue paying employee benefits to judges on top of the full range of extras the state already offers. Most of the public scrutiny focused on Los Angeles County, which offers local jurists an extra $46,000 in benefits annually.

Less noticed was a provision in the bill that also requires courts that provide supplemental judicial benefits to continue doing so. And unlike counties, courts can't opt out of the payments.

"When bills come up for a floor vote without a lot of committee review, they're often passed off as routine," said Assemblyman Chuck DeVore, R-Irvine, one of only a handful of legislators to vote against SB 11XX.

"And lawmakers are not in the habit of doing a lot of oversight of the judiciary," DeVore said.

California pays all trial court judges $178,789 a year plus a benefit package that includes health, dental and vision coverage, life insurance, a pension plan and a self-funded retirement account. Los Angeles and 11 other counties pay for additional perks . Of the 19 courts that offer their own supplemental benefits, many provide more generous health plans that include more local doctors. Others match what county executives receive, even if it appears to duplicate what the state already offers. ….

~   ~   ~

Judge Gets $10,000 Bribe -

Innocent Man Gets 23 Years on Death Row

 

 

Judge's injustice is righted—23 years later

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/chi-fields-09-apr09,0,7988426.story

A bribe-taking judge sentenced Nathson Fields to die in 1986. In 2009: 'Not guilty'

By Matthew Walberg | Tribune reporter

April 9, 2009

The courtroom was silent Wednesday when Circuit Judge Vincent Gaughan acquitted Nathson Fields of murder, a quiet final act for an infamous murder case involving judicial corruption unprecedented even for Chicago's sordid history of graft and greed.

Years ago, a trial judge had taken a $10,000 bribe to fix this very case for Fields, a convicted killer and former El Rukn gang leader.

Wednesday, when Gaughan swiftly acquitted him of the gang hit, the 55-year-old Fields slowly walked over to his family, hugging his brother, Nathaniel, whose tears streamed down his cheeks.

"I love you so much," Nathaniel Fields said as he clasped his brother in a bear hug. "Damn!"

The result was starkly different from 1986 when Fields first went on trial for the double murder.

Judge Thomas J. Maloney, a tough former boxer with a reputation as a law-and-order advocate during 13 years in Criminal Court, pocketed a $10,000 bribe to acquit Fields and a co-defendant. But during the trial, Maloney sensed authorities were onto the fix and handed the bribe money back to a corrupt lawyer at a side door to his courtroom, federal prosecutors contended. The judge then convicted Fields and co-defendant Earl Hawkins of both murders and sentenced them to death.

Maloney was convicted and served more than a dozen years in prison for fixing three murder trials in all, but he died at 83 last October a few months after his release from prison, still defiant in his claims of innocence.

His 1993 guilty verdict grew out of a federal sting code-named Operation Greylord that led to the conviction of 15 corrupt judges, but Maloney's crimes were unprecedented. He is the only Cook County judge ever convicted of rigging murder cases.

After Maloney's conviction, Fields was granted a new trial in 1998, but he remained incarcerated until another former Death Row inmate, Aaron Patterson, bailed him out in 2003. Fields spent nearly two decades behind bars, including more than 11 years on Death Row.

In recent years, the case against Fields has languished in the courts. His retrial came more than a decade after his first conviction was overturned because of Maloney's corruption.

Prosecutors wanted to put on testimony of Fields' alleged involvement in Maloney's bribery, but Gaughan blocked that evidence, prompting a lengthy, unsuccessful appeal by prosecutors.

In another key development, Hawkins flipped on his former El Rukn cohort, agreeing to testify against Fields in exchange for a plea to a lesser crime.

The two murder victims—Jerome "Fuddy" Smith and Talman Hickman, both reputed members of the Black Gangster Disciples' Goon Squad—were gunned down in 1984 outside a public housing development in the 700 block of East 39th Street.

Fields had already finished serving about a dozen years in prison for an unrelated murder conviction when the double slaying occurred.

The bench trial before Gaughan began a quarter century later—this February—and was held off-and-on since then with lengthy breaks. After listening to closing arguments Wednesday, the judge immediately issued his verdict from the bench.

He said he found Hawkins, the state's key witness, unbelievable.

During the trial, Fields' attorneys hammered at Hawkins for once admitting he would say anything to get off Death Row. But Gaughan didn't hold that against Hawkins, saying that only "Mother Teresa and a few other people would say they wouldn't lie to get off of Death Row."

More important to Gaughan was Hawkins' admission to his involvement in the murders of 15 to 20 people during his days as a general in the powerful El Rukn street gang.

"If someone has such disregard for human life, what regard will he have for his oath?" Gaughan said. "I find him incredible."

Prosecutors declined to comment after the verdict, but Fields talked about his future plans. He said he hopes to start a construction company with Patterson, despite the fact that Patterson is serving a 30-year sentence in federal prison for gun and drug convictions.

"I feel like my prayers have been answered," Fields said. "It's been 24 years of this ordeal for my family and my friends, and now with it coming to an end, it's like a dream come true."

Fields said he may go on a vacation. "Somewhere on the West Coast," he said. "I've never seen an ocean, never seen any mountains. I'm kind of behind on that kind of stuff."

mwalberg@...

 

Sent by:

www.jail4judges.org

P.O. Box 207

North Hollywood, CA. 91603

 

 

Dear Tax Day Tea Party Leadership:

 

Here is the problem. Unless the remedy involves the following four criteria, we are spinning our wheels. The remedy must center upon;

 

1.     Judicial accountability

2.     directly to the People

3.     in the forum of a Grand Jury

4.     on the issue of judicial immunity.

 

Through this means all the states’ Attorney Generals will be forced to take action against the Federal Reserve Banking system because no state can collect a tax that is not nominated in gold and silver coin, Art. I, Sec. 10. Once the Federal Reserve collapses, so will the IRS.

 

What’s more, the Grand Jury is our most powerful tool established by our founding fathers against a tyrannical government. However, we have allowed the “government” to take away our Grand Jury club and use that club upon ourselves. The only cure for this is to reinstitute our own Special Grand Juries under our control to restore a government back to the People.

 

Furthermore, it is a given that so long as one branch of the government, the judiciary, is covered by immunity, all other government force will govern under immunity - for where immunity exists, there can be no accountability.

 

Every other “remedy” that overlooks these four fundamentals for freedom are unavailing and will result in frustration and ultimate anarchy. Anarchy is not a remedy, but a logical conclusion of the lack of a remedy. All the demonstrations in the world cannot avail in the absence of these four criteria.

 

Challenges to my assertion that we have the absolute need for;  judicial accountability, directly to the People, through a Special Grand Jury, on issue of judicial immunity, are welcomed.

 

-Ron Branson

VictoryUSA@...

www.jail4judges.org

 

_______________________________________________________

 

 

----- Original Message -----

From: Liberty Dollar

To: myprivate@...

Sent: Wednesday, April 08, 2009 10:07 PM

Subject: Alert: Tax Day Tea Party in Your Town

 

        Dear Liberty Dollar Supporters:

 

      Please support the Tea Party's national tax day protest on April 15.

      Please visit http://taxdayteaparty.com/ to find the nearest Tea Party and take action!

 

      What is this Tea Party effort all about?

      The Tea Party effort is just a small piece of a much larger movement aimed at restoring the basic free-market principles our country was built on. The Constitution, for the most part, is being ignored by our current government and we intend on working together to correct the problem.

 

      The Tea Party effort is a grassroots, collaborative volunteer organization made up of every day American citizens from across the country. We take pride in the fact that we've built a 50 state network of leaders and activists using nothing more than the internet, a few websites and a burning desire to restore freedom.

 

      Toby Marie Walker, the Tea Party organizer in Waco Texas says, "Our representatives have forgotten who they represent, what the Constitution says, and that WE are THEIR boss. We surround them, we put them in office and together we can send them home."

 

      "Don't underestimate the power of a ticked off taxpayer. It only takes one person to stand up, after that many will stand with you. Organize your local tea party just like you would if you were to start a business. Don't try to do it all yourself, delegate. Find people who want to help and put them in positions that best highlights their interests and skill sets. Keep a spread sheet of contacts, media, participants, volunteers, etc… Keep a journal, write everything down. Be prepared to answer WHY you are doing this and how you believe it will help (a mission statement and a vision statement are great flyer material). Don't get sidetracked with other issues, stay on task with taxes. Keep your group as non-partisan as possible, there are problems in congress on both sides of the aisle. Lastly, have fun and hang on for the ride!

 

      Remember: NORFED - National Organization for the Repeal of the Federal Reserve Act and the Internal Revenue Code, originally issued the Liberty Dollar - America's inflation proof currency that has provided a proven, peaceful and profitable solution to our country's monetary problem since 1998 - is alive and doing very well!

 

      Change the money - Change the country at www.LibertyDollar.org  

 

      Bernard von NotHaus

      Monetary Architect

      888.LIB.DOLLAR

 

      Please visit http://taxdayteaparty.com/ to find the nearest Tea Party and take action!  The wait is over. Time to End the Fed and IRS.

 

 

 

Embezzling From The Embezzlers

 

 

Thursday, April 9, 2009 - Page 3 Metro News-Enterprise

 

Former State Bar Employee Charged With Embezzlement

By a MetNews Staff

Writer

Attorney General Jerry Brown has filed seven criminal charges against a former State Bar employee from Oakland over her alleged embezzlement of $675,000 from the organization.

 

Brown filed one count of embezzlement and six counts of filing false tax returns against Sharon Elyce Pearl, 51, Monday in the Alameda Superior Court. She faces up to nine years in prison if convicted of all counts.

 

Pearl served as the State Bar’s director of real property, and was responsible for collecting rent from tenants who leased retail space in the building housing the association’s headquarters in San Francisco. The complaint alleges Pearl directed tenants to make rent checks payable to “PLOT-The State Bar of California” as early as 2002, and deposited them into accounts held by the Piedmont Light Opera

Theatre, upon which she was a signatory. She then allegedly transferred the funds to her personal bank account.

 

Brown said Pearl used the embezzled funds to pay for “spa treatments, designer clothes, lavish meals and fancy hotel rooms.”

 

In a release, he said the State Bar did not keep track of the rent payments it was owed and did not discover the embezzlement until Pearl requested a check for a tenant’s security deposit refund. When no record indicating the State Bar actually received the deposit could be found, the organization launched an investigation which discovered Pearl was keeping two sets of books. The investigation was then referred to the Attorney General’s Special Crimes Unit for prosecution. Pearl has agreed to surrender to authorities on Monday, Brown’s office said.

 

Copyright

2009, Metropolitan News Company

 

         

         

Baptist pastor beaten and tazered for absolutely nothing except asserting his rights as protected under the U.S. Constitution. Signs of things to come for Americans living in a police state.

 

See video below.

 

http://www.youtube.com:80/watch?v=YUzd7G875Hc  

 

 

Ron Branson

VictoryUSA@...

 

Faithful Word Pastor

Tortured For His Stand on Principles

Phoenix New Times

Pastor Claims Abuse at Border Patrol Checkpoint on Interstate 8

By Ray Stern in News

Thursday, Apr. 16 2009 @ 12:24PM

http://blogs.phoenixnewtimes.com/valleyfever/2009/04/phoenix_pastor_claims_abuse_at.php

 

A local Baptist pastor who was left bloodied and indignant Tuesday night after a stop at the Border Patrol's checkpoint on eastbound Interstate 8 wonders in a recent video, "Why is this happening in the United States of America?"

New Times readers who remember our February 2008 article on the infamous checkpoint know the answer: Because of a disputed -- but still potent -- U.S. Supreme Court ruling.

As the article states, the Border Patrol was granted an exception to normal Fourth Amendment procedures, allowing the agency to set up checkpoints with trained dogs on any road within 100 miles of the international border. Funding for drug-and-human-sniffing dogs increased after the 9/11 attacks, resulting in thousands of recreational pot users -- and few criminals or illegal immigrants -- getting busted at the Interstate 8 checkpoint.

Pastor Steven Anderson of the Faithful Word Baptist Church, 2707 West Southern Avenue in Tempe, presumably doesn't use drugs or smuggle undocumented workers into the country. His offense was to demand a Constitutional right that doesn't apply near the border.

In a YouTube video Anderson made and posted yesterday, the pastor narrates a tale that should send chills down the spine of any American.

While driving through the checkpoint, located about 70 miles east of Yuma, a Border Patrol dog "alerted" to the pastor's vehicle, and agents instructed him to pull his car over to an inspection area. Anderson refused, claiming the dog had seemed mellow and that the agents had no right to search him. Agents blocked his path for an hour until an officer from the Arizona Department of Public Safety showed up, Anderson says.

Anderson's Web site photo

The lawmen broke his vehicle's windows with hammers, shot him with a Taser and threw him to the ground, he says.

"He's got his foot on my head," Anderson says of one officer. "I'm shot by more Tasers again... They're just torturing me with these Tasers again and again."

Anderson doesn't make it clear who's doing the brutalizing, whether Border Patrol agents or state troopers or both. His vehicle was searched, but no contraband was found, he says.

His forehead bleeding from cuts, Anderson was arrested and driven to an urgent care facility in Yuma. A DPS trooper ignored his desperate pleas to be allowed to urinate until Anderson was in pain, he says.

The pastor received 11 stitches and spent the night in jail. He has an arraignment tomorrow at 10 a.m. in Yuma, at which he'll plead not guilty to whatever charge they try to throw at him.

Perhaps God will be on his side, even if the Supreme Court isn't.

 

U.S. Supreme Court:

“The general rule is that an unconstitutional statute, though having the form and name of law, is in reality no law, but is wholly void, and ineffective for any purpose; since unconstitutionality dates from the time of its enactment, and not merely from the date of the decision so branding it. An unconstitutional law, in legal contemplation, is as inoperative as if it had never been passed. Such a statute leaves the question that it purports to settle just as it would be had the statute not been enacted.

 

Since an unconstitutional law is void, the general principles follow that it imposes no duties, confers no rights, creates no office, bestows no power or authority on anyone, affords no protection, and justifies no acts performed under it…

 

A void act cannot be legally consistent with a valid one. An unconstitutional law cannot operate to supersede any existing valid law. Indeed, insofar as a statute runs counter to the fundamental law of the land, it is superseded thereby.

 

No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce it.”  

                      —Sixteenth American Jurisprudence Second Edition, Section 177

 

www.JAIL4Judges.org

VictoryUSA@...

P.O. Box 207

North Hollywood, CA. 91603

 

 

 

Church Seized for Refusing to Incorporate