Skip to search.

Breaking News Visit Yahoo! News for the latest.

×Close this window

jail4judges · J.A.I.L. -- The Judicial Accountability Initiative Law - A proposed law to increase the accountability of our judiciary.

The Yahoo! Groups Product Blog

Check it out!

Group Information

  • Members: 1582
  • Category: Law
  • Founded: May 20, 2000
  • Language: English
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Message search is now enhanced, find messages faster. Take it for a spin.

Messages

Advanced
Messages Help
Messages 109 - 138 of 1790   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Messages: Show Message Summaries Sort by Date ^  
#109 From: "jail4judges" <jail4judges@...>
Date: Thu Jul 13, 2000 7:55 pm
Subject: *** Official Criticism of JAIL
jail4judges@...
Send Email Send Email
 
Looking Back On JAIL History
 
    As I was cleaning up past JAIL files, I came across a number of jewels that would deserve resending due to the enormous growth of JAIL in the last six months. Below is one of those jewels from the California Courts of Appeal. The actual name has been subdued in that I was politely asked by him to "call off my attack dogs." The entire country couldn't wait to jump on their keyboards to address him. He first tried threatening me for all the letters he received, but then his attitude changed and he cried "Uncle," and politely asked me to do whatever I could to stop the inflow.
    This was at a time when JAIL had only one state -- California. We now are twenty-six states strong, and have a much greater following, recognition and credibility. As one candidate now running for a State Supreme Court states -- JAIL presents an achievable goal. And it is that "achievable goal" that JAIL will obtain!
 
-Ronald Branson
 
 
OFFICIAL CRITICISM OF JAIL4JUDGES  -  11/4/99
 
    "Out of curiosity, I went to your homepage and glanced at this J.A.I.L. initiative.  I don't know what kind of dream world are you living in?  You propose to subject judges to criminal liability based upon a legal decision??  It's simply ridiculous. 
    In many areas, there are simply no clear cut right or wrong answers.  If you have as much experience as you claim to have, you would know that.  How could you justify criminal and civil liability under these circumstances. Do you think many people would want to be judges, if this law was in place?? What about the provision allowing non-attorneys to sit in judgment of judges?? You need at least some legal training to determine whether a legal error occurred.  And I spotted these issues by just glancing at your initiative.
    Imagine what else can be uncovered under a more exacting review."
 
From [name withheld upon request], California Courts of Appeal.
 

REBUTTAL
 
Dear [Name withheld upon request]: 
   
    It is with great delight that I take this opportunity to respond to your concern. First, let me state that I am the author of this initiative. While I am not an attorney (thank God), never a day has passed in seventeen years that I have not had a matter pending in some court at some level. I am very well versed in law, a public speaker, and respected by many practicing attorneys.   
    As is common with the courts in which I have been involved, you totally misrepresent the facts before you, then based on those false facts you draw your false conclusions. You are an ideal example of why we need JAIL4Judges.   
    You accuse J.A.I.L. of "...propos[ing] to subject judges to criminal liability based upon a legal decision?? It's simply ridiculous.  In many areas, there are simply no clear cut right or wrong answers."   
    The initiative, which you claim to have read, states in paragraph (c) in its beginning right after "definitions": "...Preserving the purpose of protecting judges from frivolous and harassing actions, no immunity shielding a judge shall be construed to extend to any deliberate violation of law, fraud or conspiracy, intentional violation of due process of law, deliberate disregard of material facts, judicial acts without jurisdiction, blocking of a lawful conclusion of a case, or any deliberate violation of the Constitutions of California or the United States." You could not have missed it.   
    [Name withheld], how do you get, "...propose to subject judges to criminal liability based upon a legal decision" out of that? As author of this initiative, I couldn't make it clearer that this initiative has nothing to do with "right or wrong answers."      In my public speeches I state that even after J.A.I.L. passes, judges may freely exercise discretion. Judges may make bad decisions, wrong decisions, and even decisions violative of clear law. What they cannot do, however, is WILLFULLY violate the law or the Constitution!   [Name withheld], how could you, in good faith, be critical of that? Or is it that you don't want to see it for what it is?
    If you are going to criticize J.A.I.L., then I want to hear why you believe that judges should be able to WILLFULLY violate the law or the Constitution, to commit fraud or conspiracy, or INTENTIONALLY violate due process of law, or DELIBERATELY disregard material facts, or block a lawful conclusion of a case.  Let's keep on point!   
    Then you say, "How could you justify criminal and civil liability under these circumstances." The problem with your question is, your phrase, "these circumstances" is false and misrepresents J.A.I.L. The initiative justifies civil liability for the specific willful misconduct afore-described, and criminal liability based upon existing criminal statutes passed by the
legislature, namely the Penal Code, (see paragraph (r)). The judge receives all the Constitutional processes due by a jury before liability is imposed.
 
    Do you disagree with those procedures, [name withheld]? Or is that not the way you want to see it? Or do you believe that judges are above the law and should remain unaccountable?   
    You state, "Do you think many people would want to be judges, if this law was in place??" The answer is YES!  Right now the cost of running for judgeship in California is approximately $70,000. Many who are honest and desiring a bench position are barred financially from running against the wealthy and well connected. After J.A.I.L., this cost will diminish tremendously, the corrupt  judges will leave like rats on a sinking ship, and only those who are honest will want their seats. Do you have a problem with that, [name withheld]? Or does that sound too much like a statewide recall of all corrupt judges?
    "What about the provision allowing non-attorneys to sit in judgment of judges?? You need at least some legal training to determine whether a legal error occurred."  Again, we are not talking about "legal error," the false premise that you make.   
    "And I spotted these issues by just glancing at your initiative. Imagine what else can be uncovered under a more exacting review." As I said above, you, as do the courts, cannot or will not see the truth that's in front of you.
    You are a prime example of why we need JAIL4Judges. J.A.I.L. is here to stay. Live with it! J.A.I.L. will one day oversee the entire California judiciary and overtake the nation. Congress itself will not be able to ignore J.A.I.L. We shall then conquer the federal judicial system with Federal Judicial Accountability.   
    Thanks for writing.  Your comments are welcome after your "more exacting review."
 
-Ron Branson
**********************************************
The germ of destruction of our nation is in the power
of the judiciary...            -- Thomas Jefferson (1821)
 
The Judiciary of the United States is the subtle corps of sappers and miners constantly working under ground to undermine the foundations of our confederated fabric. 
                                     -- Thomas Jefferson (1820)
**********************************************
A real diamond will withstand the test of whether it is a real diamond!                              -Ronald Branson
 
"Nothing is easier to defend than truth, yet nothing is more
difficult to propagate!"       
- Bastiatlaw@...
 
"...that which is right will become popular, and that which
is wrong, ...will soon lose the power of delusion, and sink
into disesteem."                          Thomas Paine
J.A.I.L.  (Judicial Accountability Initiative Law)
Use header to subscribe/remove: jail4judges@...
JAIL is a unique addition to our form of government.
JAIL is powerful! It is dynamic! It is America's ONLY hope!
Visit JAIL's informative websites, www.jail4judges.org (& .net)
Other egroups may sign on at jail4judges@egroups.com
JAIL's message is spreading across this nation vociferously!
Support JAIL @ P.O. Box 207, No. Hollywood, CA 91603
 
"..it does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate,
tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds.."
                                                 --Samuel Adams     
"There are a thousand hacking at the branches of evil to one
who is striking at the root."   -- Henry David Thoreau    <><
______________________________________________

#110 From: "jail4judges" <jail4judges@...>
Date: Thu Jul 13, 2000 10:01 pm
Subject: *** First N.H. Impeachment in 200 Yrs.
jail4judges@...
Send Email Send Email
 
 
7/13/00
New Hampshire House
Impeaches Chief Justice

By NORMA LOVE
Associated Press Writer
CONCORD, N.H. (AP)
 
    The chief justice of the New Hampshire Supreme Court the state's first impeached official in two centuries is looking forward to the chance to defend himself at a Senate trial, his lawyer says.
   The House overwhelmingly impeached Chief Justice David Brock on Wednesday. Lawmakers accused him of ethics violations ranging from perjury to letting disqualified justices take part in case discussions.  ....
    The last New Hampshire official impeached was Supreme Court Justice Woodbury Langdon in 1790, for bad attendance. He resigned before his Senate trial.
   Brock, who has been chief justice since 1986, is accused of
improperly calling a lower-court judge about a politically
connected lawsuit; talking to another justice about the handling of that justice's divorce; lying under oath during the investigation; and allowing justices who had been disqualified from hearing certain cases because of conflicts of interest to comment on impending rulings.
    .... The investigation has already forced the resignation of one justice and placed two others under a cloud.
   GOP Rep. Albert Hamel said the House could restore the high court's moral authority only by voting for impeachment: ``I hope that we have equal fortitude, guts, courage, to do what we have to do in this situation.''
   .... In testimony before the House Judiciary Committee last month, Brock apologized for poor judgment but said he meant no harm .... 
    The articles also charge that Brock in February asked for
then-Supreme Court Justice Stephen Thayer's opinion about the appointment of an appeals panel in Thayer's divorce case and later discussed the panel with Thayer privately. Thayer resigned earlier this year to avoid possible criminal prosecution.
   Disclosure of Thayer's intervention prompted a group of ex-wives of other New Hampshire judges to threaten a lawsuit in April. The women argued they were unable to get competent lawyers or decent divorce settlements because of their husbands' influence.
   Brock's lawyers and other supporters said the Judiciary
Committee lowered the threshold for impeachment too far.
....  On Monday, Brock said that he would consider resigning if he could do so with dignity, and only if the House did not adopt the article of impeachment accusing him of lying. If he resigns now, before he turns 65, he will get no pension, unless the Legislature changes the law. The House voted Wednesday against doing that.
   Earlier in the investigation, Justices Sherman Horton and John Broderick were accused of ethics violations for not immediately blowing the whistle on Thayer. But the Judiciary Committee deciding against impeaching or reprimanding the two justices, saying months of publicity had damaged their reputations enough. ....


J.A.I.L.  (Judicial Accountability Initiative Law)
Use header to subscribe/remove: jail4judges@...
JAIL is a unique addition to our form of government.
JAIL is powerful! It is dynamic! It is America's ONLY hope!
Visit JAIL's informative websites, www.jail4judges.org (& .net)
Other egroups may sign on at jail4judges@egroups.com
JAIL's message is spreading across this nation vociferously!
Support JAIL @ P.O. Box 207, No. Hollywood, CA 91603
 
"..it does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate,
tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds.."
                                                 --Samuel Adams     
"There are a thousand hacking at the branches of evil to one
who is striking at the root."   -- Henry David Thoreau    <><
______________________________________________

#111 From: "jail4judges" <jail4judges@...>
Date: Fri Jul 14, 2000 5:33 am
Subject: *** Addendum - Petition to Congress
jail4judges@...
Send Email Send Email
 
 
Addendum to First Amended Petition to Congress
for Articles of Impeachment
 
    The Author/Founder of JAIL, Ronald Branson, received a letter from Patrick McAdam, of the lawfirm of Iverson, Yoakum, Papiano & Hatch, counsel for Lockheed Martin, dated June 29, 2000, addressed to the Clerk of the United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit, a copy of which letter is attached [See attmt. "Patrick McAdam Ltr 6-29-00"]* and hereunder pasted, marked Exhibit OA-1.
    That letter is an Exhibit to the Affidavit of Ronald Branson Re: Overt Act No.1 in further pursuance of an Extortion Plot. [See attmt. "Overt Act No. 1 (Affid. 7-7-00)"].*
    This Extortion Plot is fully described in Branson's First Amended Petition to Congress appearing on the website at www.jail4judges.org
 
    Attorney Patrick McAdam's letter is pasted below:

   IVERSON, YOAKUM, PAPIANO & HATCH  LAWYERS
One Wilshire Building
624 South Grand Avenue
 27th Floor
Los Angeles, California 90017-3328
(213) 624-7444
Telecopier:
(213) 629-4563
 
June 29, 2000
Cathy Catterson, Clerk
United States Court of Appeals
   for the Ninth Circuit
Post Office Box 193939
San Francisco, CA 94119-3939
   
    Re:     Ronald Branson v. City of Los Angeles et al
              Nos. 98-56530, 98-56685
 
Dear Ms. Catterson: 
 
    On February 25, 2000 Appellate Commissioner Peter L. Shaw entered an order awarding Lockheed Martin IMS attorney’s fees in the amount of $10,207 and doubling Lockheed Martin IMS’s costs. Commissioner Shaw also directed the Clerk to "amend the mandate to so reflect." As of the date of this letter, however, we have not received that amended mandate. Has it been issued?
                                Sincerely,
                                /s/
                                Patrick McAdam of
            IVERSON, YOAKUM, PAPAINO & HATCH
 
PMC: an
 
cc: Ronald Branson
 
Exhibit OA-1

    The Affidavit of 7-7-00 (with Exhibit OA-1) was mailed to Congressman Henry Hyde on July 8, 2000 [See attmt. "Overt Act No. 1 (Cvr Ltr to Hyde 7-8-00)"]*  with Congressman Hyde's letter to Congressman John Duncan for reference. [See attmt. "Letter From Hyde To Duncan 4-24-00]*                         Accompanying the letter to Hyde is the proposed federal JAIL Bill. [See attmt. "Judicial Accountability and Integrity Legislation"]*

Significance:  On December 27, 1994, Branson, as a defense against unauthorized and harassing actions by Lockheed Martin, filed a state tort action for his injuries caused by Lockheed Martin operating as the Parking Violations Bureau of the City of Los Angeles. No state court would address the facts set forth by Branson against Lockheed, nor was Branson afforded his statutory right to an appeal under California Code of Civil Procedure 906. As a result, Branson was forced to take his statutory deprivation to Federal District Court, where it too refused to address Branson's entitlement under C.C.P. 906. Instead of receiving redress in federal court, Branson was slapped with sanctions urged by Lockheed's counsel, Patrick McAdam, without any evidentiary foundation or support. The federal appellate judges even refused in writing to support its judgment upon Branson's specific request in writing that they do so. Thus an evil extortion plot and conspiracy between the federal judges and Lockheed Martin and Patrick McAdam was devised against  Branson for the benefit of Lockheed Martin. Branson then registered a Fourth Amendment Affidavit with the U.S. Attorney for the arrest and prosecution of the perpetrators. Branson has no intention of participating in any manner in this felony extortion plot engineered by Patrick McAdam.

Lockheed Martin:  This case represents only the tip of the iceberg. Many are not familiar that Lockheed is one of the greatest ills in our American society in the privatization of our government, both locally and nationally. Many think they are dealing with government, when in fact they are actually dealing with a private corporation for the benefit and profit of their shareholders on the New York Stock Exchange. For instance, Lockheed is big time in the child support industry that is destroying our family units, while raking in millions! Yet most people think Lockheed just builds aircraft and space rockets. Lockheed is the mastermind behind information-gathering of the people for government.

* JAIL's Attachment Policy:
We realize the dangers associated with viruses moving
around the internet via attachments. Therefore, it is our
policy not to open attachments for security reasons.
    There arises times, however, when we are requested
(or required) to send out attachments, such as when
there are problems with downloading our JAIL Signature Petition.
    All emails originating from JAIL containing attach-
ments are self-generated in our computer. Our computer
is believed to be virus free, and we will never knowingly
send a virus through our self-made attachments. We are
currently running the latest Norton Anti-Virus Software.
While we encourage you to trust JAIL, we ask you to
exercise your own judgment. -Ron Branson/JAIL Author


J.A.I.L.  (Judicial Accountability Initiative Law)
Use header to subscribe/remove: jail4judges@...
JAIL is a unique addition to our form of government.
JAIL is powerful! It is dynamic! It is America's ONLY hope!
Visit JAIL's informative websites, www.jail4judges.org (& .net)
Other egroups may sign on at jail4judges@egroups.com
JAIL's message is spreading across this nation vociferously!
Support JAIL @ P.O. Box 207, No. Hollywood, CA 91603
 
"..it does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate,
tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds.."
                                                 --Samuel Adams     
"There are a thousand hacking at the branches of evil to one
who is striking at the root."   -- Henry David Thoreau    <><
______________________________________________

#112 From: "jail4judges" <jail4judges@...>
Date: Fri Jul 14, 2000 9:19 am
Subject: Press And Courts Working Together
jail4judges@...
Send Email Send Email
 
(Instructions: You will need to use your full page window option to see all the way across the page so you will not need to scroll side to side.)
 
 
Home |  News |  Courts |  Opinions |  Rules |  Forms |  Self-Help |  FAQ |  Library |  Site Map |  Search |  Contact
 Bench-Bar-Press Committee of Washington

Seattle Times
June 23, 2000

Press and courts working together benefits all

by William L. Downing
Special to The Seattle Times

Let's face it, every now and then a judge needs to have a chunk taken outa his butt!" Or so held the judge, Hizzoner Mills Lane, veteran prosecutor and real-life judge whose jurisdiction now is daytime TV. Respected jurist Hiller Zobel of Boston concurred by separate opinion. 

Not to be outdone longtime Associated Press correspondent Linda Deutsch and ABC newsman Tim O'Brien dispatched their views bemoaning the laziness and pandering to sensationalism that too often mar the media's reporting of court proceedings.

With that off their chests, these four and about seventy-five other leading judges and journalists sat down together in Reno, Nevada to look constructively toward a common future. The occasion was the inaugural conference of the Donald W. Reynolds National Center for the Courts and Media.

It wasn't chance that brought us all to Reno. The University of Nevada, Reno is the home of the National Judicial College and also the Reynolds School of Journalism which are collaborating on this bold new project.

....

Former Judge Kenneth Starr, in his opening address, noted a public cynicism he felt was being fueled by the media. With this phenomenon eroding public trust and confidence in the courts, he urged judges and reporters to work to offset it.

...

After a limited amount of beating up on each other and occasionally on themselves, the two camps emerged with some shared conclusions. Having a public that is uninformed or with senses dulled disserves both the interests of the courts and of the media. Both the judiciary and the press, individually, could be doing a better job of educating the public.

....

Media representatives also acknowledged that the press can do a better job of educating the public and at the same time helping the courts by insisting that the journalistic community maintain high standards for responsible reporting, A poorly researched, sensationalized story by one station about one judge can damage the credibility of all courts and all news organs. "Get it first but get it right" remains a journalistic credo that has benefits for all.

With substantial justification, reporters feel that too often their efforts at informing the public are frustrated by judicial impediments needlessly placed in the way of their ability to report on what is going on in court. Exhibits may be sealed, files made unavailable for review, cameras barred, gag orders issued and judges may refuse to comment, all for no good reason.

....

Deprived of the best information available, the public's level of confidence in their court system will erode.

....

Everyone then headed home to pass the commitment to a new cooperation along to their colleagues. There is much work to be done within the ranks of both the judiciary and the press.

....

William L. Downing has been a King County Superior Court Judge since 1989 and currently serves as the Chair of the Washington State Bench-Bar-Press Liaison Committee.

Copyright 2000 The Seattle Times Company
Reproduced with permission.

 
Home |  News |  Courts |  Opinions |  Rules |  Forms |  Self-Help |  FAQ |  Library |  Site Map |  Search |  Contact
 

 
    I draw your attention to a couple of paragraphs from the above union of the judges and the media, and that is, "Former Judge Kenneth Starr, in his opening address, noted a public cynicism he felt was being fueled by the media. With this phenomenon eroding public trust and confidence in the courts, he urged judges and reporters to work to offset it." and "Deprived of the best information available, the public's level of confidence in their court system will erode."
    It becomes obvious that the efforts of the likes of JAIL are having success in educating the public on our judicial system. The ironic thing, which this author has known for some time, is that the more people know about their judicial system, the more shocked and amazed they become. I am convinced that there is no way our current judicial system can become open and frank with the public, for anything they do opens closets containing skeletins they need to keep sealed. In otherwords, judges want to be open to avoid criticism, but not too open, lest they suffer criticism. These are signs that we, the People, are winning. Corruption just cannot operate in open light of day.  -Ronald Branson
 
**********************************************
The germ of destruction of our nation is in the power
of the judiciary...            -- Thomas Jefferson (1821)
 
The Judiciary of the United States is the subtle corps of sappers and miners constantly working under ground to undermine the foundations of our confederated fabric. 
                                     -- Thomas Jefferson (1820)
**********************************************
J.A.I.L.  (Judicial Accountability Initiative Law)
Use header to subscribe/remove: jail4judges@...
JAIL is a unique addition to our form of government.
JAIL is powerful! It is dynamic! It is America's ONLY hope!
Visit JAIL's informative websites, www.jail4judges.org (& .net)
Other egroups may sign on at jail4judges@egroups.com
JAIL's message is spreading across this nation vociferously!
Support JAIL @ P.O. Box 207, No. Hollywood, CA 91603
 
"..it does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate,
tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds.."
                                                 --Samuel Adams     
"There are a thousand hacking at the branches of evil to one
who is striking at the root."   -- Henry David Thoreau    <><
______________________________________________

#113 From: "jail4judges" <jail4judges@...>
Date: Fri Jul 14, 2000 9:36 pm
Subject: Fw: All Americans Win A Tax Fight!
jail4judges@...
Send Email Send Email
 
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2000 5:47 PM
Subject: Fw: All Americans Win A Tax Fight!

I have heard so many times the lame excuse "what can I do about legislators", I"m just one person...Yes each of us is just one natural being, but this country is founded on the republic being supreme to government...Why do you think We the People instituted the government.  Too many of you believe the government gives us existence and purpose....hogwash and balderdash.  What are they but leaches, lampreys, and bloodsuckers, cockroaches that scurry from the light of truth...That is called democracy (socialism).  God Bless  America once again.  Ron
 
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2000 5:25 PM
Subject: All Americans Win A Tax Fight!

All Americans Win Tax Fight!   Let It Spread!

 
Anti-tax Tennesseans prevail Legislature backs down
 on unpopular proposal,
adjourns for year
6/30/00

By Patrick Poole
2000 WorldNetDaily.com

    NASHVILLE, Tenn. -- Ending one of the longest legislative sessions in state history, the Tennessee legislature temporarily sealed the fate of hard-fought efforts to implement a state income tax after weeks of vocal anti-tax protests by thousands of Tennesseans. ....
 
Tennessee's successful tax revolt
    WorldNetDaily reported two weeks ago that daily tax protests, prompted by the legislature's attempt to sneak an income tax proposal through in a rare Saturday morning session, caused support for the proposal to wither. Tennessee is one of nine states without a state income tax.
    The protests included processions of horn-honking cars circling the state Capitol and citizens gathering outside legislative chambers to jeer legislators as they entered. The success of the two-week tax revolt demonstrated the power of talk radio to mobilize opposition to the income tax. Two of Nashville's competing talk-radio stations, WTN and WLAC, joined forces and served as a catalyst for opposition to the tax proposal. 
    "I have worked in some competitive radio markets before, and I have never seen two competing stations work so closely to identify and speak out against a common political threat," Darrell Ankarlo, WTN's morning show host, told WorldNetDaily. 
    Phil Valentine, WLAC's afternoon host, said that WorldNetDaily's coverage of the Tennessee tax battle has prompted inquiries and radio interviews from stations across the country. 
    "I just did an interview with a Seattle radio station last night, and they wanted to know how we were able to work together, because legislators in Washington state want to implement a state income tax as well," Valentine told WorldNetDaily. "WorldNetDaily has made Tennessee's tax battle a national
issue, because taxpayers in other states know that if Tennessee falls, all the rest will follow like dominos. But what is so amazing about what the citizens have done here is to show that taxpayers can fight back and win." 
    In retaliation for rallying opposition to the income tax, legislators proposed a "talk-radio tax" that would have slapped broadcast companies with a 6 percent gross receipts tax, costing Tennessee radio stations $39.1 million next year alone. But after tax protestors rallied to their cause and the issue received attention from talk-radio giant Rush Limbaugh and the Wall Street Journal, legislators dropped the idea. ....
    WorldNetDaily also reported earlier this week, that the ongoing tax protests have prompted several pro-income tax legislators to lash out at constituents.
Sour grapes
    Sundquist's veto of the state budget was the first by a governor in Tennessee's history, but the House overrode the veto by a vote of 78-19 and the Senate by 20-9. According to the state constitution, only a simple majority is required in both houses to override a governor's veto. 
    Subsequent to his veto defeat, Sundquist threatened to bring the measure up again later this year in a special session or in next year's budget negotiations. "I've just begun to fight," he told reporters shortly after the legislature adjourned. 
    Sundquist has been handed defeat in his efforts to implement a state income tax in two regular sessions and two special legislative sessions over the past 15 months. Ironically, he campaigned in both 1994 and 1998 on a platform opposing the income tax, and had warned legislators in his 1999 State of the State address to avoid burdening Tennessee families with an income tax. 
    "All an income tax does is raise the tax burden on Tennesseans and create a way to finance the easy and endless expansion of government. Tennessee does not need a state income tax," he said in his 1999 address. ....
 
Claiming victory
    Taxpayer advocates and anti-income tax legislators, however, are claiming victory, saying Sundquist's efforts to drag the session out in order to woo the handful of votes he needed backfired. "Even the pro-income tax legislators just wanted to get out of here," Rep. Mae Beavers told WorldNetDaily. "Most of the members heard the voice of their constituents, who were telling them that they wanted a budget without tax increases. I think that's why we saw such large margins to override the veto."

    Legislators complained of the heavy-handed efforts by Sundquist and legislative leaders to garner votes for the income tax. Sen. David Fowler, one of the leading anti-tax legislators, took to the Senate floor Wednesday to denounce Sundquist's strategy of attrition. "I'm tired of the politics of intimidation and coercion and brow-beating and trying to buy people off," he said. "Leadership is not trying to beat people up. That's what tyrants do; it's what dictators do." ....

Lost allies
    Any future effort by Sundquist to push through an income tax will be without many key players who were involved in his recent attempts. John Ferguson, Sundquist's commissioner of finance and administration and one of the income tax's chief salesman, announced his resignation earlier this week, effective
today. Several pro-income tax legislators, fearful of voter backlash, have chosen not to run for re-election, including Rep. Bill McAfee, a House Republican sponsor of Sundquist's income tax proposal last November, and Sen. Andy Womack, the powerful chairman of the Senate Education Committee. Many other pro-income tax legislators, both Democratic and Republican, have drawn strong opposition in their primary and general election races later this year. The recent tax protests also prompted several Democratic House leaders to come out in opposition to the income tax for fear of losing their seats. Rep. Jere Hargrove, the House majority leader, Rep. Matt Kisber, chairman of the House Finance Committee, Rep. Gene Davidson, chairman of the House Education Committee, and Rep. Mike Williams, the House majority floor leader have all
spoken publicly in favor of the income tax, but vowed in recent weeks not to vote for it, bowing to constituent demands and tough reelection campaigns. ....
 

Every victory fosters another. This battle and victory in Tenn. should inspire us all to prepare for the next. Eventually those desirous to enslave us with taxes will cowardly run like whipped dogs with tails between their legs. Once we dismantle the financial base, People will again gain control. -Ron Branson
J.A.I.L.  (Judicial Accountability Initiative Law)
Use header to subscribe/remove: jail4judges@...
JAIL is a unique addition to our form of government.
JAIL is powerful! It is dynamic! It is America's ONLY hope!
Visit JAIL's informative websites, www.jail4judges.org (& .net)
Other egroups may sign on at jail4judges@egroups.com
JAIL's message is spreading across this nation vociferously!
Support JAIL @ P.O. Box 207, No. Hollywood, CA 91603
 
"..it does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate,
tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds.."
                                                 --Samuel Adams     
"There are a thousand hacking at the branches of evil to one
who is striking at the root."   -- Henry David Thoreau    <><
______________________________________________

#114 From: "jail4judges" <jail4judges@...>
Date: Fri Jul 14, 2000 10:13 pm
Subject: Fw: Heads Up! The Patriot
jail4judges@...
Send Email Send Email
 
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2000 7:03 PM
Subject: Re: Heads Up! The Patriot

----- Original Message -----
From: <cecarl@...>
To: <cecarl@...>
Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2000 5:52 PM
Subject: Heads Up! The Patriot


> The lessons of this three hour film should not be lost to man or child. There is minor romantic exaggeration and emotional pain in this traditional, but historically reasonable, account of good versus evil.  Mel Gibson, as the Patriarch of a large motherless family, is torn between staying home to protect the family and defending his freedom.  The story artfully explains
he is reluctant to go to war because he understands terrorism, having once been guilty of it while fighting in the French and Indian Wars.  His instincts are to stay home and protect his family.  He was eventually forced to do otherwise.
>
> While the real life patriots won the glorious victory over great odds, the movie also clearly explains how terror works in war, something we need to know.  Providentially, the British were reluctant to apply terror in the full measure.  If they had done so, it is unlikely the patriots could have withstood the horrible pressure on their spirit, and we would probably have no Fourth of July to celebrate.
>
> This in no way detracts from the unique and brilliant bravery and wisdom of the forefathers. They possessed the God given quality of knowing when to fight.  Any pause or delay would certainly have perpetuated a British colony, as Thomas Paine and others proclaimed.
>
> A clear lesson of the film is that terror is used as a tool of governments and armies against citizens.  It is not an invention of small and weak men with suitcase bombs or poison vials, as we want to believe.  Terrorism against families, depicted so clearly in the film, is a tool to control free men.  Britain failed to conquer the untrained and under gunned farmers who fought with spirit alone.  King George and the Redcoats were, with few exceptions, English gentlemen fighting with a code of honor.  The villain of the movie, historically infamous British Colonel Tarleton, became known as "Bloody Tarleton." He advocated unlimited terrorism to win.
>
> The British may have lost because they were unwilling to employ unlimited brutality and ruthlessness, as Tarleton advocated. He urged the ritual slaughter of women and children, as a lesson to the farmers to make the price of resistance high.  Farmers must learn to stay home and mind their crops and family, else they will find their families dead and rotting at the burned down farm sites.
>
> In The Patriot, Col. Toleton (sic) burned the entire population of a village in a church as a reprisal for supporting the Militia.  However, the gentlemanly and stuffy General Cornwallis, whose war protocols did not include terrorism, limited reprisals and brutality.  The Americans Patriots won because a fair number of them refused to quit, go home, and mind their families in the face of the threat of unforeseeable brutality.
>
> History tells us the British lost their squeamishness about killing women in the 19th century and became the undisputed ugly terrorist model to the world.  They committed violence against civilians in campaign after campaign against natives around the world.  Perhaps the worst example of this was the
incredibly brutal Boer Wars (Dutch farmers).  There, in 1905, the British prevailed and conquered the farmers, who fought with determination and killed over 20,000 British soldiers in a losing cause.  The difference was not lack of will on the part of the Boers, but that the British applied unlimited terrorism as depicted in The Patriots.
>
> The English army captured and interned the wives and children of almost every farmer who was not at home to protect them, and burned their farms to the ground.  By their own record, 25,000 Boers died in the war.  More than half were women and children deliberately starved in unprotected camps, a brutal deterrent to those who chose to take up arms. In 1905, the Boers capitulated to save the lives of the remaining families. England captured the world's greatest gold camps, but at a terrible moral cost. The Boer war broke the back of what had become an evil empire.
>
> The Patriot does not attempt to tell us who the world terrorists are today.  We enter the 21st Century in the midst of world bloodshed that dwarfs anything King George could have imagined.  Sadly, the decaying and depraved government of our great empire, the United States of America, is the only world power this July 4, 2000.
>
> In only 226 years, we have squandered most of the decency our forefathers fought for, and we have largely forgotten their lesson.  The "Redcoats" of today are in Washington, not London.  The few scattered patriots of the world, fighting for tiny and obscure blocks of territorial independence, are
scattered in other lands.  They are beset by terrorism from our government. Are we to be the successor to Great Britain as the world's most terrorist state?
>
> History is clear that a nation that terrorizes others will eventually turn to terror at home.  We American patriots, if we dare call ourselves such, are sleeping victims of future enemies. The "Redcoats" are within our gates. Who will identify them, and who will expose them?  Our future is in our own hands, as it was with the patriot farmers in 1776.  God has no reason to
help us if we do not help ourselves.
>
> Those who wish to stand with us may become a Cloudseeder.  Send your name, address and telephone.  You will receive the key to the Cloudseeder by return mail, with no obligation except to yourself.
>
>
> "Heads Up!" Copyright 2000, may be reproduced in full for non-commercial
use.
>
> We Hold These Truths
> 4839 E. Greenway Road, #151
> Scottsdale, AZ 85254
> (http://www.whtt.org)
> 480-947-3329
>
> Watch for Heads Up!  Phantom Terrorism.
> To be deleted please reply  "Remove" in the Subject line

#115 From: "jail4judges" <jail4judges@...>
Date: Sat Jul 15, 2000 6:45 pm
Subject: Man Without A Face - Who Is He?
jail4judges@...
Send Email Send Email
 
 
MAN WITHOUT A FACE -
WHO IS HE?
 
    Here is a true story by Paul Harvey. .... You will be surprised who this young man turns out to be.  (Do not look at the bottom of this letter until you have read it fully)
    Years ago a hardworking man took his family from New York State to Australia to take advantage of a work opportunity there. Part of this man's family was a handsome young son who had aspirations of joining the circus as a trapeze artist or an actor. This young fellow, biding his time
until a circus job or even one as a stagehand came along, worked at the local shipyards which bordered on the worse section of town. 
    Walking home from work one evening this young man was attacked by five thugs who wanted to rob him. Instead of just giving up his money the young fellow resisted. However they bested him easily and proceeded to beat him to a pulp. They
mashed his face with their boots, and kicked and beat his body brutally with clubs, leaving him for dead. 
    When the police happened to find him lying in the road they assumed he was dead and called for the Morgue Wagon. On the way to the morgue a policeman heard him gasp for air, and they immediately took him to the emergency unit at the hospital. When he was placed on a gurney a nurse remarked to her horror, that this young man no longer had a face. Each eye socket was smashed, his skull, legs, and arms fractured, his nose literally hanging from his face, all his teeth were gone, and his jaw was almost completely torn from his skull.
    Although his life was spared, he spent over a year in the hospital. When he finally left, his body may have healed but his face was disgusting to look at. He was no longer the handsome youth that everyone admired.
    When the young man started to look for work again he was turned down by everyone just on account of the way he looked. One potential employer suggested to him that he join the freak show at the circus as The Man Who Had No Face.  And he did this for a while. He was still rejected by everyone and no one wanted to be seen in his company. He had thoughts of suicide. This went on for five years.
    One day he passed a church and sought some solace there. Entering the church he encountered a priest who had seen him sobbing while kneeling in a pew.  The priest took pity on him and took him to the rectory where they talked at length.  ....
    The priest, through his personal contacts was able to secure the services of the best plastic surgeon in Australia. There would be no cost to the young man, as the doctor was the priest's best friend. The doctor ... was so impressed by the young man. Whose outlook now on life, even though he
had experienced the worst, was filled with good humor and love. The surgery was a miraculous success.  All the best dental work was also done for him. ....
    He was ... blessed with a wonderful, beautiful wife, many children, and success in an industry which would have been the furthest thing from his mind as a career, if not for the goodness of God and the love of the people who cared
for him. This he acknowledges publicly.
    The young man. Mel Gibson. His life was the inspiration for his production of the movie "The Man Without A Face."      He is to be admired by all of us as a God fearing man, a political conservative, and an example to all as a true man of courage.



J.A.I.L.  (Judicial Accountability Initiative Law)
Use header to subscribe/remove: jail4judges@...
JAIL is a unique addition to our form of government.
JAIL is powerful! It is dynamic! It is America's ONLY hope!
Visit JAIL's informative websites, www.jail4judges.org (& .net)
Other egroups may sign on at jail4judges@egroups.com
JAIL's message is spreading across this nation vociferously!
Support JAIL @ P.O. Box 207, No. Hollywood, CA 91603
 
"..it does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate,
tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds.."
                                                 --Samuel Adams     
"There are a thousand hacking at the branches of evil to one
who is striking at the root."   -- Henry David Thoreau    <><
______________________________________________

#116 From: "jail4judges" <jail4judges@...>
Date: Sat Jul 15, 2000 7:56 pm
Subject: Eternal Grace Baptist Church Home Page
jail4judges@...
Send Email Send Email
 
 
 
Dear Pastor John S. Brown:
 
    I just visited your teriffic website. And to your message, I say Amen. While I have not had the opportunity to read your many pointer topics, I can tell from just the titles that they would be very interesting. We do think alike. The email sent me was on Mel Gibson that pointed me to your site. That was great.
    First, let me tell you that I am sending a copy of this to my pastor, Michael D. McCubbins. We went to Bible School together some thirty-one years ago, and I thereafter took up the ministry as a very strong right-wing fundamentalist.
    I began the Alert Sheet Publications around 1974 exposing cults, false religions and compromising gospel ministries. I was either loved or hated. Around 1980 I became acquainted with the work and stand of Pastor Greg Dixon, and adopted his viewpoints re the First Amendment and the IRS.
    I have been through, or acquainted with most every patriotic cause that has come down the pike. This brings me to tell you what the Lord has currently called me to do, and I do think you will be very, very excited about this. I believe it is time the churches get off their duff and take a stand herein.
    I am the author/founder of jail4judges.org, of which our website may be viewed at that same location. I know this is God's calling for me, and I do believe this is a means of sparking a revival here in America. Remember the Scripture, "When the wicked are in power, the people mourn, but when the righteous rule, the people rejoice." I realize that I could get into a discussion with some on "When my people, which are called by my name..."., but who is to say that this JAIL is not the Lord's response, "then I will hear from heaven?" As to what stage we are in, I do not know, but I do know that the Lord has called me to lead in this matter, and I do believe it will produce a revival, if it is not, THE Revival!
    Now this is where you come in. We have many ministers on our mailing, and it is through ministers like you that can help churches to see the cause and take the stand. As you know, sometimes there is a time to get up off our knees and physically take agressive action in behalf of the Lord. "Hath the Lord as great delight in sacrifice as in obedience? Behold, to obey is better than sacrifice."
    J.A.I.L. is the answer. It is the answer not only for the political minded conservative, but JAIL is the answer for Christians everywhere! "I will build my Church, and the gates of hell shall not prevail against (withstand) it.!" We are the Victors, it's time we act like Victors! --- not continue to play the role of "woe is me, I'll just occupy till He comes."
    While it is true that we are not of this world, it does not follow that we, as believers, cannot become victors in the physical and political sense. If we think defeatism, we are sure to obtain it. While a secular saying, it is nonetheless a truism, "Quiters never win, and winners never quit." I'm sure you have the picture I'm drawing for the churches. It's time to march forward with the churches as an army. Will you be a general? Thanks, Brother Brown for your time. We now have a following of twenty-six states in JAIL!
 
-Ronald Branson, on His Behalf

Eternal Grace Baptist Church
Home Page


Salvation is of the LORD


Jonah 2:9 KJV,"... Salvation [is] of the LORD."

Psalm 3:8 KJV, "Salvation [belongeth] unto the LORD: thy blessing [is] upon thy people. Selah."

John 1:10-13 KJV, " He [Christ] was in the world, and the world was made by him, and the world knew him not. (11) He came unto his own, and his own received him not. (12) But as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God, [even] to them that believe on his name: (13) Which were born, not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God. "


WE ARE AN UN-REGISTERED CHURCH
NOT A RELIGIOUS CORPORATION.

Pastor John S. Brown
Eternal Grace Baptist Church of New Maysville, Indiana
64th Judicial District
8965 N. Country Road 675 E.
Bainbridge, Indiana
(765) 522-1308
Go to Eternal Grace Baptist Church: What Folly Page Go to Eternal Grace Baptist Church: Book Reviews Page
Go to Eternal Grace Baptist Church: Newswire Go to Eternal Grace Baptist Church: RealVideo Page
Go to my links page Send email to Pastor John Stephen Brown
preacher@...
John Stephen Brown

Weekly Services begin with Sunday:
9:45 A.M. each Sunday with Bible Training.
10:45 A.M. Sunday Morning Worship.
2:00 P.M. Sunday Evening Worship.
7:00 P. M. Wednesday Bible/Prayer meeting.




Some of our Ministries

Bulletin

Evaluation of Pending Indiana Legislation

Indiana Proposed Legislation; Godly & Constitutional

Indiana Proposed Legislation; Ungodly & Unconstitutional

To be used of God is our desire.

The intent of this web page, Dear Visitor, is to explain succinctly how it is possible to be a truly born again, blood, bought believer in the LORD Jesus Christ and worship with those who have not compromised the faith, once delivered unto the saints, like so many have in our era by seeking, finding, and defending the current status quo, known as the incorporation status which has been bestowed upon religious groups by various state governments.

If your heart is sinking like the Titanic at the mention of this, if suddenly you have realized that this web page is not what you thought it might be, then this challenge is for you, dear friend. Put that mouse down, and give some serious thought to this. If you find your mouse pointer wavering, then you must, at least, examine what is causing such an occurrence. Why is this happening? Is it a fear of the unknown? Could it be an apprehension of being rejected by your family or friends? Are you afraid to encounter the unadulterated truth of Scripture regarding the Biblical doctrine of the Church? Surely not! In all likelihood, you are a rational, spiritual being, unfettered by the swelling forces of censorship. To be sure, the amazing concept of mankind possessing an unalienable right - thus a responsibility - such as freedom of speech or freedom of thought is intriguing. Therefore, why do you now hesitate?

Friend, Submit yourself unto Almighty God (See: James 4:7). Bring every thought herein into captivity to the obedience to Christ as Holy Scripture teaches (See: 2 Corinthians 10:5-6). Also, begin to fervently pray for discernment (See: James 1:5) as you embark upon your research with your mental faculties attuned to grasp God's perfect will (See: Romans 12:1-2) regarding this topic of the Church, rather than a religious corporation.

Although it goes without saying that this page, like most others you have probably visited, shall always be under construction, you are welcome to interact with your suggestions. The simple reason: We earnestly endeavor here at the Eternal Grace Baptist Church to address the growing arguments, concepts, concerns, ideas, issues, matters, subjects, themes, and topics from "A" to "Z" that encompass all of us from a Scriptural perspective. Your questions are encouraged.

May God be glorified in each of our lives!

Sincerely,

Pastor Brown




Information on...

A Book Review of R. C. Sprouls book
"The Last Days According to Jesus"
by Pastor J. S. Brown

A Pastor's Ponderings

A subtle attack upon all independent, unregistered Churches in America

Alert! Alert! Alert!

Alert! Michael Brock Story!
Jailed for asking Constitutional Questions

Alert! Michael Brock Documents!

American Heritage River Land Grab

An Eschatology of Victory

An Open Letter initiated by an inquiry regarding Alan Keyes

Antichrist Again!

Antisemitic or anti-contextual Bible exegesis?

April Fool's Day? Where did it originate?

Are Preachers to be Salaried or Sustained?

The Beast of Revelation Identified

Christ as seen in Old Testament Scripture

Church, Inc.

Faith in relation to Death

God's Control not gun control!

Holidays and Holy Days: Christmas

I am "Theophobic" not "homophobic."

In Lieu of Tax Exempt Numbers

Indianapolis Baptist Temple Press Release February 24, 2000

Indianapolis Baptist Temple Press Release March 2, 2000

Jesus Guarantees to Come Again!

London Baptist Confession of Faith of 1689

Margaret Macdonald's Original Pretribulation Vision

Patriot for Profit

Patriot for Profit: Letter that stimulated the article

Spiritual Authority Scripturally Scrutinized

Tax the Lord Jesus Christ?
brought to you by the sodomites in civil government

The I.R.S. and The Church

The Pastor Richard Mooneyhan Story

Tithe Confescated

Thanksgiving, America's only Scriptural Holiday

The Believer's Banner

Threat Assessment of the Police Movement in Indiana

To Know or Not To Know

When Will We Ever Learn?

Would you consider abortion in the following 4 situations?


Romans 12:1-2 (KJV), "I beseech you therefore, brethren, by the mercies of God, that ye present your bodies a living sacrifice, holy, acceptable unto God, which is your reasonable service. (2) And be not conformed to this world: but be ye transformed by the renewing of your mind, that ye may prove what is that good, and acceptable, and perfect, will of God."

2 Corinthians 10:5-6 (KJV), "Casting down imaginations, and every high thing that exalteth itself against the knowledge of God, and bringing into captivity every thought to the obedience of Christ; (6) And having in a readiness to revenge all disobedience, when your obedience is fulfilled."

James 1:5 (KJV), "If any of you lack wisdom, let him ask of God, that giveth to all men liberally, and upbraideth not; and it shall be given him."

James 4:7 (KJV), "Submit yourselves therefore to God. Resist the devil, and he will flee from you."


Remember, This page is always
Under Construction (consbar.gif)

#117 From: "jail4judges" <jail4judges@...>
Date: Tue Jul 18, 2000 9:17 pm
Subject: Social Security Number Use To Be Curbed
jail4judges@...
Send Email Send Email
 

HR 4611
http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=106_cong_bills&doc
id=f:h4611ih.txt
S.2699
http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=106_cong_bills&docid=f:s2699is.txt

House Bill Would End Use of Social Security Numbers as ID 

-- 14 July 2000.

A House subcommittee on Thursday proposed a bill that would ban the use of Social Security numbers as personal identifiers, preventing numbers
from being shown on driver licenses, or required for cashing a check or obtaining other services.

If passed, officials said, Social Security numbers would be barred from use as a national identification numbering system.  The bill would also prevent soldiers from including the number as part of "name, rank and serial number." The change is urgently needed to prevent growing abuse of Social Security numbers by thieves and cons, Republican and Democratic sponsors of the bill said at a Capitol Hill press conference.  Members are also concerned that private companies can legally buy and sell them as marketing tools, further eroding personal privacy.

"Social Security numbers have become the gateway for crooked con-artists to raid your bank accounts, max out your credit cards and literally steal your identity," said Rep.  E.  Clay Shaw Jr., R-Fla., chairman of the Social Security Subcommittee.

Allegations of "identity theft" using the numbers increased from 26,531 in fiscal year 1998 to 62,000 in fiscal 1999, according to the House Ways and Means Committee.

"I am a victim of identity theft," declared Rep.  Mark Foley, R-Fla., who said someone obtained a credit card in his name using a Social Security number and charged $785 worth of goods.  He added that the theft resulted in constant phone calls from a collection agency seeking relief.

"I found myself overwhelmed with the number of calls I placed and the horrible treatment I received by the credit reporting bureau," Foley said.  "This has to be frustrating, particularly for seniors or people who are less likely to pursue it as vigorously as I did."

Officials said the bill would ban all sales of Social Security numbers, prohibit government agencies from displaying the numbers, remove the numbers from government checks and prohibit their appearance on licenses, vehicle registration and other identification records.  It would also prohibit most businesses from denying service when individuals refuse to provide their Social Security numbers.  An exception would be made for banks, which must report some transactions to the government.

The measure would also strengthen penalties for misuse.  Criminal violators would face up to $250,000 in fines and five years imprisonment.  Civil fines for lesser offenses could be imposed up to $5,000.

The bill is backed by a bipartisan group within the House Ways and Means Committee.  Lawmakers said they planned action on the bill in committee
next week. *

 

    * Revelation 13:16, 17, 14:9-11 "And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads: And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, the name of the beast, or the number of his name.  .... If any man worship the beast and his image, and receive his mark in his forehead, or in his hand, The same shall drink of the wine of the wrath of God, which is poured out without mixture into the cup of his indignation; and he shall be tormented with fire and brimstone in the presence of the holy angels, and in the presence of the Lamb: And the smoke of their torment ascendeth up for ever and ever: and they have no rest day nor night, who worship the beast and his image, and whosoever receiveth the mark of his name."
 
J.A.I.L.  (Judicial Accountability Initiative Law)
Use header to subscribe/remove: jail4judges@...
JAIL is a unique addition to our form of government.
JAIL is powerful! It is dynamic! It is America's ONLY hope!
Visit JAIL's informative websites, www.jail4judges.org (& .net)
Other egroups may sign on at jail4judges@egroups.com
JAIL's message is spreading across this nation vociferously!
Support JAIL @ P.O. Box 207, No. Hollywood, CA 91603
 
"..it does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate,
tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds.."
                                                 --Samuel Adams     
"There are a thousand hacking at the branches of evil to one
who is striking at the root."   -- Henry David Thoreau    <><
______________________________________________

#118 From: "jail4judges" <jail4judges@...>
Date: Wed Jul 19, 2000 2:33 am
Subject: Justice Souter Questioned
jail4judges@...
Send Email Send Email
 
SUPREME COURT JUSTICE ASKED ABOUT POSSIBLE ROLE IN JUDICIAL SCANDAL
 
Date:   7/7/00 9:14:40 AM Pacific Daylight Time
From:   info@...
Sender: infonet-owner@...
Reply-to:   info@...
To: infonet@...

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
July 7, 2000
Contact:  Richard Tomkins
(202) 646-5172
    Judicial Watch Asks Justice Souter to Issue Statement About His Role in Case that May Lead To Impeachment of Former Colleague in New Hampshire.
    New Hampshire Politicians Failed to Question Justice Souter.

    (Washington, DC) Judicial Watch yesterday hand-delivered a letter to The Honorable David Souter, Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States, concerning the impeachment of his former colleague, David A. Brock,
the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of New Hampshire. The New Hampshire legislature is considering impeaching Chief Justice Brock for, among other things, his alleged interference in a case concerning a powerful New Hampshire politician. Press reports show that Justice Souter, when he served on the New Hampshire Supreme Court in 1987, was also involved in this case.
    Despite his involvement in the case, Justice Souter was only justice from the New Hampshire Supreme Court of 1987 not to be questioned by New Hampshire legislators investigating the controversy. As Justice Souter may have relevant information to the controversy, Judicial Watch thought it in the public interest to ask him to issue a public statement about his knowledge of the matters. A copy of the letter to Justice Souter is available on the Judicial Watch Internet site at www.judicialwatch.org.
    "We hope that Justice Souter responds quickly to our letter. We urge Justice Souter, both in the interests of justice and in fairness to his former colleagues on the New Hampshire bench, to issue a statement to 'clear the air' of any lingering questions about any role he may have had in the scandal," said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton.
    Responding to the fact that the New Hampshire scandal came to public light only after a law clerk came forward, Fitton added, "We wish other members of the judiciary had come forward in New Hampshire earlier about the improper practices of their colleagues. What is interesting about the investigation of the Chief Justice in New Hampshire is that it is happening at all. Too often, corruption in the judiciary goes unchecked."

    Judicial Watch is a public interest law firm that investigates and prosecutes public corruption. *

* Judicial Watch will be holding a fundraiser August 20, 2000 in LaCanada. Tickets may be purchased for this event for $25 per person, or $40 per couple. Larry Klayman will be one of the featured speakers. To obtain more information, contact Connie at Judicial Watch, (626) 287-4540, or fax her at
(626) 237-2003. Tell her "Ron sent ya."
 
J.A.I.L.  (Judicial Accountability Initiative Law)
Use header to subscribe/remove: jail4judges@...
JAIL is a unique addition to our form of government.
JAIL is powerful! It is dynamic! It is America's ONLY hope!
Visit JAIL's informative websites, www.jail4judges.org (& .net)
Other egroups may sign on at jail4judges@egroups.com
JAIL's message is spreading across this nation vociferously!
Support JAIL @ P.O. Box 207, No. Hollywood, CA 91603
 
"..it does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate,
tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds.."
                                                 --Samuel Adams     
"There are a thousand hacking at the branches of evil to one
who is striking at the root."   -- Henry David Thoreau    <><
______________________________________________

#119 From: "jail4judges" <jail4judges@...>
Date: Wed Jul 19, 2000 3:04 am
Subject: *** The Cry For More Judicial Protection!
jail4judges@...
Send Email Send Email
 
 
THE CRY FOR MORE JUDICIAL PROTECTION  IS APPARENT!
 
Thursday, July 6, 2000

Building's Facade Hides a Bomb-Resistant Design
Safety: Deceptively open Las Vegas courthouse still meets concerns that grew out of Oklahoma City blast.

By TOM GORMAN, Times Staff Writer

     LAS VEGAS--In a town that boasts the country's most eclectic urban architecture, the newest monument comes not from a creative casino but from the button-down federal government: a building designed to stand up to a terrorist bombing.

     It's the new federal courthouse--an eight-story building that officials say would have survived an attack like the 1995 bombing that destroyed the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City, killing 168 people.

     Determined to avoid an inhospitable concrete design that would project fear and hostility to the public, builders instead created a $97-million courthouse that looks nothing like a fortress. In fact, it appears almost vulnerable, with extensive use of glass and a skylight-topped rotunda entry.

     Looks, the builders say, are deceiving.

     Set to open July 15, the courthouse is the first to be designed and constructed by the federal government incorporating architectural guidelines on blast resistance adopted after the Oklahoma City bombing.

     Most of the safety features are all but invisible to passersby.

     The floor slabs, for instance, are fastened to support beams so they won't fall down--or be blown upward--in a blast. That design feature reflects what structural engineers learned after the 1994 Northridge earthquake, in which buildings were suddenly thrust upward.

     Interior support columns are constructed so that if one collapses in an explosion, others will not follow like dominoes, as in the Oklahoma City tragedy.

     Landscaping elements and exterior design treatments--including concrete planter boxes, stairs and other concrete barriers--will prevent explosives-laden vehicles from parking near the building, which sits on Las Vegas Boulevard between Bridger and Clark avenues.

     But the most important feature of the new-generation structure, engineers say, is its exterior shell.

     Because modern high-rise buildings are supported by their interior steel frameworks, rather than by exterior walls, those outside facades are actually little more than sidings of aluminum and window glass attached to the floor slabs.

     These so-called curtain walls are designed to protect the building's occupants from the outside elements: wind, rain and extreme temperatures. The curtain walls of high-rises in some areas, such as the Florida coast, are stronger to better withstand hurricane-force winds.

     But until now, curtain walls have not been designed to absorb the concussion, wind and flying debris caused by a bomb blast.

     That changed when the General Services Administration examined what happened in Oklahoma City and drafted new construction criteria on blast resistance. Overseas embassy buildings are constructed to different security standards developed by the State Department.

     The Las Vegas courthouse, approved by Congress in 1996, is the first to incorporate the GSA's new anti-blast design standards. Nearly $5 million of the construction cost reflects the new security measures.

     The government did not tell prospective contractors how to build the structure, but simply required that it be able to protect occupants from a terrorist's bomb. Just how large a blast the building can withstand is secret, said Mary Filippini, a GSA spokeswoman in San Francisco.

     To meet the new requirements, contractor J.A. Jones Construction of Charlotte, N.C., hired Harmon Ltd., a Minneapolis-based company specializing in curtain wall design and construction.

     Working with the GSA's blast consultants and others, Harmon engineers improved upon existing designs to construct a curtain wall so effective that it surprised doubters, officials said.

     The curtain wall is anchored to the building's framework more effectively than in other structures. It also is thicker--12 inches, instead of the more common 6 or 8 inches--because of extra aluminum reinforcement.

     Part of the curtain wall is what appear to be ordinary glass windows. But they are made of multiple layers of glass attached to a clear laminate membrane, designed so that the glass will shatter but not fly off in an explosion. The windows are held in aluminum framing backed by channels and tubes designed to bend in a blast, but not to be blown away altogether.

     Some of the courthouse facade features conventional precast concrete panels, which also are blast resistant but allow the use of smaller windows only. The government shied away from an entirely concrete exterior to avoid a forbidding appearance.

     "Normally, people contemplate a bunker-type fortress--a lot of concrete with small windows--when they want to protect occupants" from blasts, said Bob Smilowitz, a structural engineer hired by the GSA. The use of a relatively lightweight curtain wall may seem counterintuitive, he said, but it is designed to absorb a blast and protect the structure--and people--within.

     Prototypes of the new curtain wall were subjected to blasts at the government's White Sands Missile Range in New Mexico, and they survived beyond expectations, said Smilowitz and the GSA's Filippini.

     "It was pretty phenomenal," she said. "The computer told us it would work, but when we tested full-size panels by actually trying to blow them up, they came through very well.

     "I won't say how large the blast was, but it was at least as large as the Oklahoma City blast," Filippini said. "We feel very comfortable in saying that if this curtain wall was used in Oklahoma City, it wouldn't have been damaged the way it was."

     Engineers say they were pleased that they were able to incorporate blast resistance in the building without compromising its aesthetics.

     "Large expanses of concrete are very successful from a protective standpoint, but obviously they say a few things about the perception of threat--that we're building bunkers and kowtowing to potential terroristic threats," said Kevin Cole, manager of design at Harmon Ltd.

     The building will house 10 courtrooms, as well as offices for the U.S. attorney, Nevada's congressional delegation and other federal officials.

     Some tenants said they were upset that the GSA was touting the new building as blast-resistant, for fear it would draw attention to the facility.

     Terrorism aside, others said the courthouse is a welcome addition to downtown Las Vegas. "It's a beautiful structure that will enhance and revitalize the downtown community," said Chief U.S. District Judge Howard McKibben. "We're looking forward to occupying it." *

Copyright 2000 Los Angeles Times


* If anyone thinks about it, it is only by actions of the judiciary that any nation crumbles. With a sound judiciary, only an international war could overthrow it. Today, the judiciary's response to national unrest is more steel, concrete and bullet-proof glass to protect them! It was the U.S. Supreme Court's Dred Scott Decision, involving legislation in the State of Missouri, that instigated the Civil War.
 
**********************************************
The germ of destruction of our nation is in the power
of the judiciary...            -- Thomas Jefferson (1821)
 
The Judiciary of the United States is the subtle corps of sappers and miners constantly working under ground to undermine the foundations of our confederated fabric. 
                                     -- Thomas Jefferson (1820)
**********************************************
"Power is the great evil with which we are contending.  We have divided power between three branches of government and erected checks and balances to prevent abuse of power.  However, where is the check on the power of the judiciary?  If we fail to check the power of the judiciary, I predict that we will eventually live under judicial tyranny."     - Patrick Henry

 
J.A.I.L.  (Judicial Accountability Initiative Law)
Use header to subscribe/remove: jail4judges@...
JAIL is a unique addition to our form of government.
JAIL is powerful! It is dynamic! It is America's ONLY hope!
Visit JAIL's informative websites, www.jail4judges.org (& .net)
Other egroups may sign on at jail4judges@egroups.com
JAIL's message is spreading across this nation vociferously!
Support JAIL @ P.O. Box 207, No. Hollywood, CA 91603
 
"..it does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate,
tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds.."
                                                 --Samuel Adams     
"There are a thousand hacking at the branches of evil to one
who is striking at the root."   -- Henry David Thoreau    <><
______________________________________________

#120 From: "jail4judges" <jail4judges@...>
Date: Wed Jul 19, 2000 3:23 am
Subject: Is America Free?
jail4judges@...
Send Email Send Email
 
 

ARE YOU TRULY FREE... when over half of your hard earned “money” is stolen, directly and indirectly, by “legalized fraud” called “income taxes” to support unconscionable spending habits of career politicians... and rulers around the world? And,

ARE YOU TRULY FREE...when government agents falsely accuse people of “crimes” shoot and kill a nursing mother and child (Weaver), use banned gas to burn out over 80 people (Waco Holocaust), Gordon Call, etc. And,

ARE YOU TRULY FREE...when you are deprived of your currency which you worked hard for, paid taxes on? The $1,000 and $500 bills were slyly taken out of circulation. When anyone DOES NOT want to play the game of “cashless, checkless society” he is accused of “breaking the law”. Plastic strips are now inserted in the new currency. Bankers/government claim anyone with a large amount of cash is a criminal. This violates many religious beliefs such as Rev.,13:16-18. The conspirators’ real purpose is to work for the private bankers, putting us in a cashless, checkless society. And,

WHEN...in our “LAND OF THE FREE” you can no longer drive on freeways or public street without buying a driver’s license and car registration from bureaucrats...giving them LEGAL TITLE of OWNERSHIP to your car in exchange for a “certificate of title” that shows you gave your “true ownership” AWAY? And,

WHEN...BUREAUCRATS MAKE YOU PAY legal ransom to a private insurance-company so you can drive your car? And,

WHEN...in our “LAND OF THE FREE” you must send your children to a licensed school or bureaucrats can/will legally kidnap your children, confiscate your property and put you in jail? And,

When...you must read non-mainstream publications in order to learn THE TRUTH, because the national news media tells only what the “political establishment” allows it’s public to see or hear as “news”..? And,

WHEN...OUR “LAND OF THE FREE” has more political-prisoners than other nations; more slave-labor-camp-prisons (UNICOR) are being built every year? And,

WHEN...bureaucrats claim a crime needs ‘no victim” by claiming a crime is an offense against an abstract (legal fiction) called the state? And,

WHEN...business-income taxes are piled on top of each other...hidden in the prices of every American product, GROSSLY INFLATING costs, forcing industries to leave our country...taking millions of our best jobs with them? And,

WHEN... in our “LAND OF THE FREE” bureaucrats can know most of your financial transactions and “legally pry” into your bank records without your knowledge or consent? (violating a sacred trust, your privacy, and 4th amendment right). And,

WHEN ...you believe the BIG-LIE that your RIGHTS come from “public servants” instead of from ALMIGHTY GOD, Creator of all nature? And,

WHEN you “pay” your debts with dollar bills which are notices of debt you owe to the PRIVATELY OWNED Federal Reserve Banks (a private corporation) which pay no income taxes...and who create money out of thin air? And,

WHEN...in our “LAND OF THE FREE” “public servants” have created a spider web of over TWO MILLION laws and rules entangling every part of your life with entrapment schemes, (Road Blocks)-etc., while “supreme court” judges seldom agree on the meaning of any of them? And,

WHEN...if you don't pay your taxes (rent) the real owner of your property shows up, takes it from you, violating Allodial Land Rights ... and may/will shoot you, or put you in jail. And,

WHEN...in our “LAND OF THE FREE” it’s okay to legally murder unborn babies, cleverly calling aborticide “abortion” And,

WHEN... “public-servant judges” illegally guide votes of Citizen Jurors by LYING, telling them they must vote to enforce the “alleged laws” of the case (even if it violates Rights secured by the constitution)? And,

WHEN....the word “person” is “legally defined” as a “corporation” and judges and government lawyers Coerce Juries into jailing fellow Americans for disobeying laws made for private bankers and private corporations to CONTROL our once FREE PEOPLE? And,

WHEN...your church must get a 501-C3 license (tax exempt) so its members can “write off gifts”-legally worship the “state god”, not ALMIGHTY GOD, Creator of all nature? And,

WHEN...career-politicians, tax collectors, police and courts (judges) are more of a threat to life, liberty and property than a thief in the night? (Been in court lately?) And,

WHEN you SADLY LEARN..More crimes occur in American court rooms in one day than in the streets in a whole year?

WHEN...in our “LAND OF THE FREE” your children are a ward of the state because you used a marriage license? (Your children are not your children because of that license!) And,

WHEN...you are jailed for exercising your God-given Constitutionally secured Rights if you don’t “grease the palms” (fines=mulct) of bureaucrats? And,

WHEN...in our “LAND OF THE FREE” YOU CAN NO LONGER PRACTICE Free Enterprise or work without the SS-ID number, “Mark of the Beast”, and you are forced to buy a permit or license from bureaucrats or go to jail? And,

WHEN everything you and your children will ever “own” is mortgaged to foreign bankers who own the private Federal Reserve Banks, your loan could be due and collectible on demand...BECAUSE THE CONGRESS REFUSES to OBEY the CONSTITUTION providing our nation with a debt-free, Honest money system! And,

WHEN...you could be dying from a disease (cancer) that is curable in other countries (suppressed in AmeriKa since the early 30's) with certain medicines, nutrients, and vitamins which, if used to save your life, is a crime in our “LAND OF THE FREE” stripping us of our 1st and 9th amendment Rights, FREEDOM of CHOICE? And,

WHEN... if you say something publicly that is not “Politically Correct”, the news-media can publicly condemn you without a trial, by implying you are a racist, cultist, neo-nazi, anti-Semitic, hate monger, bigot, radical, armed and dangerous, extreme-right-winger, tax-protester, un-American...etc.? And,

WHEN...the Federal Government pretends to wage a “War On Drugs” (actually promoting drugs) as an excuse to make laws that deprive us of our God-given RIGHTS to Life, Liberty, and Property ...Freedom to Choose and to be Left Alone? And,

WHEN...CRIME PAYS BIG... for Big Brother Government, lying politicians, judges, government lawyers, police...because every new law causes many more victimless crimes as an excuse for higher and higher taxes, supposedly used to punish the violators (victims) of newly invented crimes, which God never thought of, against a legal fiction, the State? And,

WHEN...in our “LAND OF THE FREE” the flag displayed in court rooms and other public buildings has a gold fringe border, which is NOT the American flag, indicating that we are under Martial Law unannounced? And,

WHEN..... you must ask and pay bureaucrats for legal permission to get married, even though marriage is a sacrament directly from our loving father, ALMIGHTY GOD? And,

WHEN...Republican and Democratic Presidents give your taxes to foreign countries, food that should be given to our needy is given to foreign nations, destroying our own people...our self-defense arms are confiscated...creating wars and riots; the United States Military is under the United Nations command...YOUR JOB exported overseas...our “LAND OF THE FREE” PLACED UNDER THE DICTATORIAL RULE of NON-ELECTED FOREIGNERS called the NEW WORLD ORDER?! Creating wars and riots;

IF THIS IS FREEDOM
Then WHAT is SLAVERY???

If You Think You're FREE,
What can you do without:

A. getting a permit;
B. getting a license;
C. paying a tax;
D. your Social Surveillance-lD # (should not be used for identification)

....



J.A.I.L.  (Judicial Accountability Initiative Law)
Use header to subscribe/remove: jail4judges@...
JAIL is a unique addition to our form of government.
JAIL is powerful! It is dynamic! It is America's ONLY hope!
Visit JAIL's informative websites, www.jail4judges.org (& .net)
Other egroups may sign on at jail4judges@egroups.com
JAIL's message is spreading across this nation vociferously!
Support JAIL @ P.O. Box 207, No. Hollywood, CA 91603
 
"..it does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate,
tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds.."
                                                 --Samuel Adams     
"There are a thousand hacking at the branches of evil to one
who is striking at the root."   -- Henry David Thoreau    <><
______________________________________________

#121 From: "jail4judges" <jail4judges@...>
Date: Wed Jul 19, 2000 8:52 am
Subject: Fw: Where We're Headed
jail4judges@...
Send Email Send Email
 
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, July 08, 2000 6:26 PM
Subject: Fw: Where We're Headed

How do you REALLY FEEL about this one?  Have you given ANY THOUGHT  to the
apparent consequences?  Ron


----- Original Message -----
From: The Republican <therepublican@...>
To: <therepublican@...>
Sent: Monday, June 26, 2000 11:14 PM
Subject: Where We're Headed


>
>
> FWD via Jim Hardin:
>
> The Freedom Page
> http://freedompage.home.mindspring.com
> To receive Freedom Page mail, put "Subscribe"
> as subject to freedompage@...
> To be removed, put "Remove" as subject.
>
> Alabama Committee To Get Us Out of the UN
> http://themustardseed.home.mindspring.com
>
> Where We're Headed
> http://www.sierratimes.com/rwaters.htm
>
> By Robert A. Waters - 06.23.00
>
> You're sound asleep when you hear a thump outside your bedroom door.
>
> Half-awake, and nearly paralyzed with fear, you hear muffled whispers. At
> least two people have broken into your house and are moving your way.
>
> With your heart pumping, you reach down beside your bed and pick up your
> shotgun. You rack a shell into the chamber, then inch toward the door and
> open it.
>
> In the darkness, you make out two shadows. One holds a weapon
> -- it looks like a crowbar.
>
> When the intruder brandishes it as if to strike, you raise the shotgun and
> fire. The blast knocks both thugs to the floor. One writhes and screams
> while the second man crawls to the front door and lurches outside.
>
> As you pick up the telephone to call police, you know you're in trouble.
In
> your country, most guns were outlawed years before, and the few that are
> privately owned are so stringently regulated as to make them useless.
Yours
> was never registered.
>
> Police arrive and inform you that the second burglar has died. They arrest
> you for First Degree Murder and Illegal Possession of a Firearm.
>
> When you talk to your attorney, he tells you not to worry: authorities
will
> probably plea the case down to manslaughter. "What kind of sentence will I
> get?" you ask. "Only ten-to-twelve years," he replies, as if that's
> nothing. "Behave yourself, and you'll be out in seven."
>
> The next day, the shooting is the lead story in the local newspaper.
> Somehow, you're portrayed as an eccentric vigilante while the two men you
> shot are represented as choir boys. Their friends and relatives can't find
> an unkind word to say about them. Buried deep down in the article,
> authorities acknowledge that both "victims" have been arrested numerous
> times. But the next day's headline says it all: "Lovable Rogue Son Didn't
> Deserve to Die." The thieves have been transformed from career criminals
> into Robin Hood-type pranksters.
>
> As the days wear on, the story takes wings. The national media picks it
up,
> then the international media.
>
> The surviving burglar has become a folk hero. Your attorney says the thief
> is preparing to sue you, and he'll probably win.
>
> The media publishes reports that your home has been burglarized several
> times in the past and that you've been critical of local police for their
> lack of effort in apprehending the suspects. After the last break-in, you
> told your neighbor that you would be prepared next time. The District
> Attorney uses this to allege that you were lying in wait for the burglars.
>
> A few months later, you go to trial. The charges haven't been reduced, as
> your lawyer had so confidently predicted. When you take the stand, your
> anger at the injustice of it all works against you. Prosecutors paint a
> picture of you as a mean, vengeful man.
>
> It doesn't take long for the jury to convict you of all charges.
>
> The judge sentences you to life in prison.
>
>
> This case really happened.
>
> On August 22, 1999, Tony Martin of Emneth, Norfolk, England, killed one
> burglar and wounded a second. In April, 2000, he was convicted and is now
> serving a life term.
>
> How did it become a crime to defend one's own life in the once-great
> British Empire?
>
> It started with the Pistols Act of 1903. This seemingly reasonable law
> forbade selling pistols to minors or felons and established that handgun
> sales were to be made only to those who had a license. The Firearms Act of
> 1920 expanded licensing to include not only handguns but all firearms
> except shotguns. Later laws passed in 1953 and 1967 outlawed the carrying
> of any weapon by private citizens and mandated the registration of all
> shotguns.
>
> Momentum for total handgun confiscation began in earnest after the
> Hungerford mass shooting in 1987. Michael Ryan, a mentally disturbed man
> with a Kalashnikov rifle, walked down the streets shooting everyone he
saw.
> When the smoke cleared, 17 people were dead.
>
> The British public, already de-sensitized by eighty years of "gun
control",
> demanded even tougher restrictions. (The seizure of all privately owned
> handguns was the objective even though Ryan used a rifle.)
>
> Nine years later, at Dunblane, Scotland, Thomas Hamilton used a
> semi-automatic weapon to murder 16 children and a teacher at a public
school.
>
> For many years, the media had portrayed all gun owners as mentally
> unstable, or worse, criminals. Now the press had a real kook with which to
> beat up law-abiding gun owners. Day after day, week after week, the media
> gave up all pretense of objectivity and demanded a total ban on all
> handguns. The Dunblane Inquiry, a few months later, sealed the fate of the
> few sidearms still owned by private citizens.
>
> During the years in which the British government incrementally took away
> most gun rights, the notion that a citizen had the right to armed
> self-defense came to be seen as vigilantism. Authorities refused to grant
> gun licenses to people who were threatened, claiming that self-defense was
> no longer considered a reason to own a gun. Citizens who shot burglars or
> robbers or rapists were charged while the real criminals were released.
> Indeed, after the Martin shooting, a police spokesman was quoted as
saying,
> "We cannot have people take the law into their own hands."
>
> All of Martin's neighbors had been robbed numerous times, and several
> elderly people were severely injured in beatings by young thugs who had no
> fear of the consequences. Martin himself, a collector of antiques, had
seen
> most of his collection trashed or stolen by burglars.
>
> When the Dunblane Inquiry ended, citizens who owned handguns were given
> three months to turn them over to local authorities. Being good British
> subjects, most people obeyed the law. The few who didn't were visited by
> police and threatened with ten-year prison sentences if they didn't
comply.
>
> Police later bragged that they'd taken nearly 200,000 handguns from
private
> citizens.
>
> How did the authorities know who had handguns?
>
> The guns had been registered and licensed. Kinda like cars.
>
> Sound familiar?
>
>
> [Forwarded For Information Purposes Only - Not
> Necessarily Endorsed By The Sender - A.K. Pritchard]
>
> ------------------------------
>
> A.K. Pritchard
> http://www.ideasign.com/chiliast/
> http://rosie.acmecity.com/songfest/189/
>
> To subscribe to  "The Republican"  email list - just ask!
> therepublican@...
>
>
>  Mr. President, it is natural to man to indulge
> in the illusions of hope. We are apt to shut our
> eyes against a painful truth, and listen to the
> song of that siren till she transforms us into
> beasts. Is this the part of wise men, engaged
> in a great and arduous struggle for liberty?
> Are we disposed to be of the numbers of those
> who, having eyes, see not, and, having ears,
> hear not, the things which so nearly concern
> their temporal salvation? For my part, whatever
> anguish of spirit it may cost, I am willing to know
> the whole truth, to know the worst, and to provide
> for it.
>
> Patrick Henry - Give Me Liberty Or Give Me Death
> March 23, 1775
>
>
>

#122 From: "jail4judges" <jail4judges@...>
Date: Thu Jul 20, 2000 2:58 am
Subject: FOREIGN TAKEOVER OF U.S.A.
jail4judges@...
Send Email Send Email
 
 
FOREIGN TAKEOVER OF U.S.A.*
 
VIRGINIA TAXPAYERS ASSOCIATION
           P. O. BOX 663
   LYNCHBURG, VA 24505

 -  25  years  in  the  cause  of  freedom  -

FROM:
Kenneth White, President
(Residence) 93 Shields Gap Rd.
Roseland, VA 22967
Tel./FAX No.:  804  277-5255
E-mail:  KWhite9472@...

6/6/00
FOR  IMMEDIATE  RELEASE

TAXPAYERS  SCORE GILMORE  PUSHING UN  'WORLD  ORDER'

    The Virginia Taxpayers Association charged today that Gov. Jim Gilmore "is deliberately pushing the Commonwealth into a new condition of subjection to totalitarian world government which will be finalized at the largest United Nations meeting in history Sept. 6-9 in New York."
    The state taxpayer organization said "most establishment media haven't wanted to talk about the Millennium Assembly and Summit, scheduled to launch a new system of 'global governance' that will in effect dissolve the United States of America and meaningful state government. 
    Elitist thought controllers fear a torrent of informed public opposition could wreck carefully laid United Nations plans which have been formulated over the last two decades.
    "Mealy-mouthed announcement of the Millennium Assembly, with bureaucratic Aesopian language, is prominent on the UN internet web site.  UN spokesmen attempt to deny that 'governance' means the same thing as 'government', but of course that is just a smoke screen.  And most casual readers will not be aware that a new 'Charter for Global Democracy', to be presented for implementation at the assembly and already signed by leaders in 56 nations, will substantially abolish individual freedom," the VTA said, in a statement approved Saturday, June 3 in Charlottesville.
    "Gilmore, who officially ordered Virginia celebration of the UN back in January, is well aware that the Millennium Assembly will destroy existing constitutional protections. But he will merely claim 'we're monitoring the situation closely', well knowing that once the world gathering starts, there will be little Virginia federal-level or state-level officials can do to stop
international takeover."
    Under the Charter for Global Democracy, the VTA said, "the U. S. will lose permanent member status on the Security Council and any UN veto power.
    "The Charter also calls for consolidation of all international
agencies under direct authority of the UN, and regulation by the UN of all transnational corporations and financial institutions, requiring an 'international code of conduct' concerning the environment and labor standards.
    "There will be an independent source of revenue for the UN, such as the 'Tobin tax' and taxes on aircraft and shipping fuels.
    "There will be a standing UN army and required individual and national compliance with all UN 'Human Rights' treaties and declarations. There will also be cancellation of all debt owed by the poorest nations, global poverty reductions, and an 'equitable sharing of global resources' as allocated by the UN.
    "Not sufficiently understood is the way the UN does away with elected governments," the VTA said.  "So-called 'peoples of the world', are the only ones given representative status at the Millennium Assembly.  They are not elected by anybody but are non-governmental organizations (NGOs) of which
there are 1603 in the world, given recognition by the UN only because their major purpose includes promotion of 'the aims, objectives and purpose of the United Nations.'
    "When these groups, pre-selected for their bias, and endorsed by Governor Gilmore, come together they will not make their decisions by voting, but by 'consensus.'  This is a bogus process of 'agreement' achieved by trained 'facilitators' and ending up with conclusions determined ahead of time," the VTA pointed out.
    "A major reason why the UN and other totalitarian entities have been allowed to proceed as far as they have is the existence today of many widely publicized but controlled opposition groups.  The agenda of these groups, which make many true statements, are however deliberately designed to be
insufficient.
    "For example, the Heritage Foundation, recognized  by the media as one of the most influential voices in Washington, completed in May a major mailing devoted to a 'United Nations Assessment Project.'  Yet the Heritage Foundation itself is listed on the United Nations web site as an NGO officially associated with the UN Department of Public Information.  And in the Heritage mailing, seeking financial support and discussing several UN treaties described as objectionable, not a word was said about the subject of paramount concern, the forthcoming Millennium Assembly or the Charter for Global Democracy, although the VTA had reported across the state
planning for the Assembly as far back as Jan. 11.  It's obvious the Heritage Foundation will do nothing to expose the Millennium Assembly or Charter in advance.
    "Of course the Heritage Foundation said nothing about the
American Sovereignty Restoration Act, HR 1146, sponsored by Rep. Ron Paul (R-Tex.), which would withdraw the United States from the United Nations and which already has 17 cosponsors in the House of Representatives.  It is vital to our future security that this act be passed."
....

Sent to JAIL by Danowood@...

 
* JAIL will curb the onslaught of the U.N. influence in the United States once passed. It is only through the permissive action of the federal courts that this country can be taken over by a foreign power. Obviously, then, we are in a race against time to avert such a takeover by the U.N. This is why we need JAIL, and soon! JAIL is the ONLY positive answer to this country's freedom and independence!
 
J.A.I.L.  (Judicial Accountability Initiative Law)
Use header to subscribe/remove: jail4judges@...
JAIL is a unique addition to our form of government.
JAIL is powerful! It is dynamic! It is America's ONLY hope!
Visit JAIL's informative websites, www.jail4judges.org (& .net)
Other egroups may sign on at jail4judges@egroups.com
JAIL's message is spreading across this nation vociferously!
Support JAIL @ P.O. Box 207, No. Hollywood, CA 91603
 
"..it does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate,
tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds.."
                                                 --Samuel Adams     
"There are a thousand hacking at the branches of evil to one
who is striking at the root."   -- Henry David Thoreau    <><
______________________________________________

#123 From: "jail4judges" <jail4judges@...>
Date: Thu Jul 20, 2000 9:02 pm
Subject: Count Your Many Blessings
jail4judges@...
Send Email Send Email
 
COUNT YOUR MANY BLESSINGS,
NAME THEM ONE BY ONE
 
  •     If you woke up this morning with more health than illness...  you are more blessed that the million who will not survive this week.
  •     If you have never experienced the danger of battle, the loneliness of imprisonment, the agony of torture, or the pangs of starvation...  you are ahead of 500 million people in the world.
  •     If you can attend a church meeting without fear of harassment, arrest, torture, or death... you are more blessed than 3 billion people in the world.
  •     If you have food in the refrigerator, clothes on your back, a roof overhead and a place to sleep...   you are richer than 75% of this world.
  •     If you have money in the bank, in your wallet, and spare change in a dish someplace...  you are among the top 8% of the world's wealthy.
  •     If you hold up your head with a smile on your face and are truly thankful...  you are blessed because the majority can, but most do not.
  •     If you can hold someone's hand, hug them or even touch them on the shoulder...  you are blessed because you can offer God's healing touch.
  •     If you prayed yesterday and today...  you are in the minority because you believe God does hear and answer prayer.
  •     If you can read this message...  you are more blessed that over 2 billion people in the world that cannot read at all.
     
     Be thankful.
Sent to JAIL by Darnall


We, the willing led by the unknowing, are doing the impossible for the ungrateful. We have done so much for so long with so little, we are now qualified to do anything with nothing.
 
J.A.I.L.  (Judicial Accountability Initiative Law)
Use header to subscribe/remove: jail4judges@...
JAIL is a unique addition to our form of government.
JAIL is powerful! It is dynamic! It is America's ONLY hope!
Visit JAIL's informative websites, www.jail4judges.org (& .net)
Other egroups may sign on at jail4judges@egroups.com
JAIL's message is spreading across this nation vociferously!
Support JAIL @ P.O. Box 207, No. Hollywood, CA 91603
 
"..it does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate,
tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds.."
                                                 --Samuel Adams     
"There are a thousand hacking at the branches of evil to one
who is striking at the root."   -- Henry David Thoreau    <><
______________________________________________

#124 From: "jail4judges" <jail4judges@...>
Date: Thu Jul 20, 2000 10:50 pm
Subject: *** J.A.I.L. COMES BEFORE SHOOTING
jail4judges@...
Send Email Send Email
 
J.A.I.L. COMES BEFORE SHOOTING
 
Dear Folks:
    We received a forward of the below email showing the comments of Al Adask to Walter J. Burien's article on the CAFR. I would like to add my comments to Mr. Adask's. Portions of his commentary to which I am responding appear in green, and his entire commentary is included beneath my response for your information.
 
    The implications are mind-boggling. They'd mean our world is so different from what we are led to believe, so much more corrupt than even I suspect, that we are left with three choices, either; 1) government agrees to end the deception and stop
overtaxing us, or 2) the American people agree to accept their status as slaves, or 3) both sides refuse to agree and precipitate a shooting revolution. The issue is that big.
 
    The above portion appears to me to imply that a "shooting revolution" is all that's left for the American people, since #1 and #2 are rhetorical. We know that won't happen. May I respectfully suggest that there are FOUR "choices", number 3 being J.A.I.L.
    We owe it to the American society and to ourselves, to try a peaceful means of gaining control of an out-of-control and deceptive government first before resorting to the ultimate means. A judiciary that's accountable to the People as a matter of fact and of constitutional law is what's so desperately needed!  Yes, "the issue is that big."  I continue to say that JAIL is the ONLY answer before "a shooting revolution," and all governments, both local and federal, would do well to support the passage of JAIL!

    Worse, how could such a fraudulent system become widespread among all states, counties, cities and the Federal Government?
 
    The answer is, we have a judiciary that's unaccountable to the People to explain how such a fraudulent system has become so widespread-- state, county, city and federal. Make
the judges responsible under the law and obedient to their oaths of office, and we'll see a change real quick, for all corruption has its backing in some judicial decision at some level!
 
-Ron Branson-
(Entire commentary below):


Comprehensive Annual Financial Reports
By Walter J. Burien, Jr.
http://www.financialprivacy.com/comprehe.htm

Forward by Al Adask - Anti-Shyster - http://www.antishyster.com/

    As editor of the AntiShyster, I've seen so many unbelievable
stories over the last eight years, that I've become jaded, cynical and worldly. There are no surprises left for me. I'm sure that I've seen it all. I've thought so for several years.
    And generally speaking, about every two or three months, life proves me absolutely wrong by showing me another story so awesome that I'm left (almost) speechless. This article introduces another one of those stories so awesome that it's right off the Richter Scale.
    Walter Burien Jr. worked as a Wall Street commodity trader for fifteen years, but now resides in  Arizona. According to Mr. Burien, every state, county and major metropolitan city is keeping two sets of books. One set (the 'Budget') is commonly
available and tracks each governmental entity's casts and tax revenue.
    The Budget is the financial record that's seen by the public and used by politicians to justify new governmental services and higher taxes.
    However, there is a second set of books (called the
Comprehensive Annual Financial Report, or CAFR) which is virtually unknown to the public but contains the real record of total governmental income. According to Mr. Burien, although
the Budget gives an accurate account of government costs, only the CAFR gives an accurate account of government's income.
    For example, while a particular state budget might report
receiving $20 billion in taxes (just barely enough to sustain its $20 billion in costs) - the CAFR might reveal the state's real income is in the neighborhood of $60 billion - three times
as much as reported on the budget. If these allegations are accurate, the particular state could stop charging all the taxes we are familiar with and, not only survive but, either double the amount of reported government services or give every citizen
a huge tax rebate.
    The implications are mind-boggling. They'd mean our world is so different from what we are led to believe, so much more corrupt than even I suspect, that we are left with three choices, either;
(1) government agrees to end the deception and stop
overtaxing us, or
(2) the American people agree to accept their status
as slaves, or
(3) both sides refuse to agree and precipitate a shooting
revolution.
The issue is that big. 
    But are Mr. Burien's allegation correct? How could any
governmental entity dare to routinely overcharge its citizens by 200%, underreport its income by 2/3rds, and knowingly press for higher taxes based on an inaccurate budget?
    Worse, how could such a fraudulent system become widespread among all states, counties, cities and the Federal Government? When you stop to think about it, Mr. Burien's
allegations are too fantastic to be credible.
    Nevertheless, I talked to Mr. Burien by phone for several hours and found him to be articulate, knowledgeable, and apparently sincere. I asked a retired professor of economics to interview Mr. Burien and evaluate his allegations.
    The professor's assessment? Burien is probably correct. I steered an Alaskan M.D. (who is also a dedicated constitutionalist researcher) to Mr. Burien. The Doctor  subsequently found evidence supporting Mr. Burien's claims: The State of Alaska and the city of Anchorage both use Budget/CAFR accounting systems that conceal a 'breathtaking' difference in reported revenue. Another researcher in  Wyoming claims that a comparison of his state's budget and CAFR also support Mr. Burien's arguments.
    In every case, there are two sets of books and the income reported on the budget is millions or billions of dollars less than is reported on the CAFR.
    Does this support prove Mr. Burien's extraordinary allegations? No. But they lend enough credence to publish his allegations to a broader audience who will do more research to confirm, refute or refine those allegations.
 

 
J.A.I.L.  (Judicial Accountability Initiative Law)
Use header to subscribe/remove: jail4judges@...
JAIL is a unique addition to our form of government.
JAIL is powerful! It is dynamic! It is America's ONLY hope!
Visit JAIL's informative websites, www.jail4judges.org (& .net)
Other egroups may sign on at jail4judges@egroups.com
JAIL's message is spreading across this nation vociferously!
Support JAIL @ P.O. Box 207, No. Hollywood, CA 91603
 
"..it does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate,
tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds.."
                                                 --Samuel Adams     
"There are a thousand hacking at the branches of evil to one
who is striking at the root."   -- Henry David Thoreau    <><
______________________________________________

#125 From: "jail4judges" <jail4judges@...>
Date: Fri Jul 21, 2000 3:04 am
Subject: *** KEEPING FOCUSED ***
jail4judges@...
Send Email Send Email
 
KEEPING FOCUSED
JAIL Responds To A Reader
 
    We must realize that the root of the ills of our society is not a "branch of government," but a doctrine. I have drawn the executive and legislative branches before the judicial only to have the judicial branch repeatedly cover for the other two. I then drew the judicial branch before the judicial branch for involvement in cover-up, and every time those in the judicial branch hid themselves behind the doctrine of judicial immunity. I then woke up to the fact that the problem in America is not a branch of government, but a doctrine! What has happened in this nation is that a doctrine has become above and superior to all branches of government!
    What we have here is a cause and effect. Why is government corrupt? It is because they are unaccountable. Why is government unaccountable? Because the system of accountability is not working. Why is that system of accountability not working? Because the judiciary covers up for it. Why does the judiciary cover up for the system? Because the judiciary itself cannot be held accountable. Why can't the judiciary be held accountable? It is because judges are immune from accountability. Well, then, why are judges immune from accountability? It is because of the doctrine of judicial immunity.
    Any effort that does not take head-on the doctrine of judicial immunity at best can only be a good cause. But a good cause is ever the enemy of what is best, because it serves, whether unwittingly or not, to distract from that which is best.
    JAIL is thrusting its sword into the head of the beast, not the leg, tail or buttocks. The powers that be have long been pleased that the populace has been distracted by every perception of the public that government or laws are the problem. But it terrifies those powers that someone has caught on to the fact that the head of the beast is not government in chief, but a doctrine. That doctrine is the nerve center of the head of the beast.
    In my speaking engagements I tell the audience, "Judicial immunity is like a mighty oak behind which all our enemies hide. You may shoot all you want, but the mighty oak just absorbs every bullet, holding those hiding behind it harmless.
    I ask, "Why hack at the leaves or break off branches when we must uproot the entire tree? 
JAIL proposes to do just that,  uproot the mighty oak leaving all who hide behind it vulnerable.  After that tree has fallen, you now have all government bureaucrats standing in a pretty little line vulnerable. A single shot can then fall three or four of them. Once they drop out of the way, another shot will take down the next three or four. Of course, by then, they are not going to be hanging around, since the doctrine of judicial immunity is no longer there to shield them. They will run for other cover, but they will have no place to hide!  There will no longer be an impenetrable cover available once the doctrine of judicial immunity has been brought directly under the control of the People.  Then the judicial branch can no longer cover for the other two.
    JAIL cannot, and WILL NOT, be distracted from its specific target--  the striking of a fatal blow to the doctrine of judicial immunity! Once successful there, JAIL shall then turn its sights upon other particular issues of corruption. But until we conquer the doctrine of judicial immunity, all else is but a distraction. When we have accomplished our single focused goal, then JAIL shall have the awesome power to correct all other evils that beset us in this country, including the Congress and the entire Executive Branch, and all other false and deceptive programs. First things first! We MUST NOT, by any means, become distracted from our goal by that which is "good!"  Only that which is BEST will we pursue!
    Thanks for sharing your mind with me. I know that you mean well, and it is in that spirit that I take your suggestion. God bless.
 
-Ron Branson-
 

Ron,

    ....I absolutely believe that the only way to really pass JAIL is by mounting an attack on the whole government rather than the judiciary alone. They work to protect each other. The legislatures will not allow for a passage of JAIL unless you flush the light on them at the same time.
     People are much more willing to talk when the legitimacy of their existence is questioned. That is what we need to do. Even if you were so lucky as to be able to get JAIL passed at the end of the day, the corrupt system would pervert everything back to what it is comfortable with.
    We have no choice but to go after the whole government. The corruption we are facing is like cancer and it is in all three branches of the government. Unless you take it out in every branch it will come back to every part. ...
**********************************************
The germ of destruction of our nation is in the power
of the judiciary...        -- Thomas Jefferson (1821)
 
The Judiciary of the United States is the subtle corps of sappers and miners constantly working under ground to undermine the foundations of our confederated fabric.
                                  -- Thomas Jefferson (1820)
**********************************************
J.A.I.L.  (Judicial Accountability Initiative Law)
Use header to subscribe/remove: jail4judges@...
JAIL is a unique addition to our form of government.
JAIL is powerful! It is dynamic! It is America's ONLY hope!
Visit JAIL's informative websites, www.jail4judges.org (& .net)
Other egroups may sign on at jail4judges@egroups.com
JAIL's message is spreading across this nation vociferously!
Support JAIL @ P.O. Box 207, No. Hollywood, CA 91603
 
"..it does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate,
tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds.."
                                                 --Samuel Adams     
"There are a thousand hacking at the branches of evil to one
who is striking at the root."   -- Henry David Thoreau    <><
______________________________________________

#126 From: "jail4judges" <jail4judges@...>
Date: Sat Jul 22, 2000 6:01 pm
Subject: Green Light for More WACOs?
jail4judges@...
Send Email Send Email
 
The Green Light for More WACOs?
 
Appearing in
Daily News (Los Angeles)
Saturday, July 22, 2000, page 11
 
Government Cleared in Siege... [excerpts]
The New York Times
 
    ST. LOUIS -- John Danforth, the special counsel investigating the 1993 tear-gas assault by federal agents on the Branch Dividian compound, Friday issued a sweeping report that cleared Attorney General Janet Reno and the government of any wrongdoing in the deadly episode.
    .... Danforth, a former Republican senator from Missouri, did not mince words. He declared the agents did not shoot at the Branch Dividians and did not start the fire that destroyed the compound on April 19, 1993, claiming the lives of about 80 people.
    He said the military was not used improperly and that the government "did not engage in a massive conspiracy and coverup."  ....
    ....
    .... He spoke pointedly and passionately about how public confidence in government had eroded....
    ....
    The report concluded the FBI agents fired three pyrotechnic rounds at a bunker about 75 yards from the living quarters of the Dividians.  The rounds did not cause any damage, the report said. *
* ...and word is out that the WACO tragedy never really happened-- it's just a concoction of the vast right-wing conspiracy to discredit the government. RB

Folks: From the inception of the J.A.I.L. initiative, I have been urging people to have cooler heads in reacting to the out-of-control powers that be in this nation. I have implored that we owe it to this country to first attempt a non-violent method of seeking a remedy to the tyranny through J.A.I.L.  Do reports like the above help quell the fire that rages in our hearts? Are the embers still burning?  You decide.  JAIL is still the ONLY answer. -Ron-
 

J.A.I.L.  (Judicial Accountability Initiative Law)
Use header to subscribe/remove: jail4judges@...
JAIL is a unique addition to our form of government.
JAIL is powerful! It is dynamic! It is America's ONLY hope!
Visit JAIL's informative websites, www.jail4judges.org (& .net)
Other egroups may sign on at jail4judges@egroups.com
JAIL's message is spreading across this nation vociferously!
Support JAIL @ P.O. Box 207, No. Hollywood, CA 91603
 
"..it does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate,
tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds.."
                                                 --Samuel Adams     
"There are a thousand hacking at the branches of evil to one
who is striking at the root."   -- Henry David Thoreau    <><
______________________________________________

#127 From: "jail4judges" <jail4judges@...>
Date: Mon Jul 24, 2000 1:57 am
Subject: Federal Gov't Cleared -- Why???
jail4judges@...
Send Email Send Email
 
    Folks, in light of additional facts that have come to light respecting the clearing of the entire federal government in the WACO incident by former Sen. Dan Danforth, (MO.), we deemed it fitting to append at the bottom of this email a behind the scene....
 
.... Follow Up to
 
The Green Light for More WACOs?
 
Appearing in
Daily News (Los Angeles)
Saturday, July 22, 2000, page 11
 
Government Cleared in Siege... [excerpts]
The New York Times
 
    ST. LOUIS -- John Danforth, the special counsel investigating the 1993 tear-gas assault by federal agents on the Branch Dividian compound, Friday issued a sweeping report that cleared Attorney General Janet Reno and the government of any wrongdoing in the deadly episode.
    .... Danforth, a former Republican senator from Missouri, did not mince words. He declared the agents did not shoot at the Branch Dividians and did not start the fire that destroyed the compound on April 19, 1993, claiming the lives of about 80 people.
    He said the military was not used improperly and that the government "did not engage in a massive conspiracy and coverup."  ....
    ....
    .... He spoke pointedly and passionately about how public confidence in government had eroded....
    ....
    The report concluded the FBI agents fired three pyrotechnic rounds at a bunker about 75 yards from the living quarters of the Dividians.  The rounds did not cause any damage, the report said. *
* ...and word is out that the WACO tragedy never really happened-- it's just a concoction of the vast right-wing conspiracy to discredit the government. RB
 
*   *   *
 
Follow Up Article: (The Why???)
The following is an excerpt from:
 http://www.cnn.com/2000/ALLPOLITICS/stories/07/22/bush.veepstakes/index.html

Cheney, Danforth emerge as Bush's top choices
July 22, 2000

    CRAWFORD, Texas (CNN) -- Former Missouri Sen. John Danforth and former Defense Secretary Dick Cheney have emerged as the leading contenders for the vice-presidential spot in Texas Gov. George W. Bush's run for president, CNN has confirmed.
    Bush is expected to make up his mind this weekend. Apart from a brief sortie to Atlanta to attend the funeral of Sen. Paul Coverdell, he has been in veritable seclusion on his 1,600-acre farm in Crawford, Texas, pondering his choices. ....
    Danforth, who said earlier this year he wasn't interested in the vice presidency, met with Bush Tuesday in Chicago.
    At a news conference on Friday, he indicated a political reason for his eagerness to wrap up his work as the special counsel appointed to investigate the 1993 siege of the Branch Davidian compound in Waco, Texas.
    "In May, an unexpected political possibility was sort of thrust my way, and at that time it was clear to me that if there was any chance of that coming to pass, it would mean I would have to step down as special counsel and I did not want to step down as special counsel without taking responsibility for the work product," Danforth said in releasing a preliminary report absolving federal agents of wrongdoing in the siege.
Hmmmm  -Ron Branson

 
J.A.I.L.  (Judicial Accountability Initiative Law)
Use header to subscribe/remove: jail4judges@...
JAIL is a unique addition to our form of government.
JAIL is powerful! It is dynamic! It is America's ONLY hope!
Visit JAIL's informative websites, www.jail4judges.org (& .net)
Other egroups may sign on at jail4judges@egroups.com
JAIL's message is spreading across this nation vociferously!
Support JAIL @ P.O. Box 207, No. Hollywood, CA 91603
 
"..it does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate,
tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds.."
                                                 --Samuel Adams     
"There are a thousand hacking at the branches of evil to one
who is striking at the root."   -- Henry David Thoreau    <><
______________________________________________

#128 From: "jail4judges" <jail4judges@...>
Date: Mon Jul 24, 2000 8:04 pm
Subject: Re: JAIL Billboard???
jail4judges@...
Send Email Send Email
 
Attention JAILers!
 
    Okay, jailers, we've got a bite below with Donna. She wants to lay money on the line to start the ball rolling. I'd like one of our jailers to lead this effort. How about pooling our efforts throughout the states, appointing a leader and forming a Billboard Committee, and come up with a/some billboard(s). It's a start. 
    I wouldn't think it would cost too much if we started along some long lonely stretch of highway. It would drop driver's  jaws and wake them up from the road monotony. They will speed home to talk about it and tell all their friends everywhere.
    At the least, let's discuss it. I'm sure driver's seeing this would respond with support for more signs. I personally think this thing has the potential of starting a contagious epidemic.  First billboard inspiring the second, and the third, etc., until they're all over the country. Even people not formally connected with JAIL will want get in on the act without our knowledge. JAIL is becoming a movement and a household name.
    I would be delighted to put this project out to everyone on our general JAIL email list. We could even consider a dedicated website to this cause.
    For obvious reasons, I won't be a part of the planning stage, but I would like to approve the final plans. (I only start fires.
-Smile.) And don't forget to include photos of the actual billboard for publicity promos. Imagine someone who has the side of a barn that "needs a paint job." I'll bet that people would even donate their barn for this. Think of the press potential. Ideas, discussions jailers? Let's go get'em!
 
    I have a more advanced version suggestion - "Got Justice? - Try www.jail4judges.org! Call 1 (900) Go4JAIL"*      
                            * $10 first 5 Min., $2 min. thereafter.
 
-Ron / Chief Fire Starter- 

----- Original Message -----
From: CRWDR1@...
Sent: Monday, July 24, 2000 2:55 AM
Subject: Re: JAIL Billboard???

Ron -  The billboard sounds like a great idea. I will gladly donate for this.
Donna, Calif. Rep.

#129 From: "jail4judges" <jail4judges@...>
Date: Mon Jul 24, 2000 10:13 pm
Subject: (No subject)
jail4judges@...
Send Email Send Email
 
 
BORN ALIVE INFANTS PROTECTION ACT (HR 4292)

July 20, 2000 Washington, D.C.
    My name is Gianna Jessen. I would like to say thank you for the opportunity to speak today.  I count it no small thing to speak the truth. I depend solely on the grace of God to do this.     I am 23 years old.  I was aborted and I did not die. My biological mother was 7 months pregnant when she went to Planned Parenthood in southern California and they advised her to have a late-term saline abortion.
    A saline abortion is a solution of salt saline that is injected into the mothers womb. The baby then gulps the solution, it burns the baby inside and out and then the mother is to deliver a dead baby within 24 hours.
    This happened to me! I remained in the solution for approximately 18 hours and was delivered ALIVE on April 6, 1977 at 6:00 am in a California abortion clinic. There were young women in the room who had already been given their injections and were waiting to deliver dead babies. When they
saw me they experienced the horror of murder. A nurse called an ambulance, while the abortionist was not yet on duty, and had me transferred to the hospital. I weighed a mere two pounds. I was saved by the sheer power of Jesus Christ.
    Ladies and gentleman I should be blind, burned.....I should be dead! And yet, I live! Due to a lack of oxygen supply during the abortion I live with cerebral palsy.
    When I was diagnosed with this, all I could do was lie there. "They" said that was all I would ever do! Through prayer and hard work by my foster mother, I was walking at age 31/2 with the help of a walker and leg braces.
    At that time I was also adopted into my wonderful family. Today I am left only with a slight limp. I no longer have need of a walker or leg braces.
    I am so thankful for my Cerebral Palsy. It allows me to really depend on Jesus for everything.
    When the freedoms of one group of helpless citizens are infringed upon, such as the unborn, the newborn, the disabled and so called "imperfect," what we do not realize is that our freedoms as a NATION and Individuals are     in great peril.
    I come today in favor of this Bill, in favor of the Protection of Life. I come to speak on behalf of the infants who have died and for those appointed to death. Learned Hand, a well respected American Jurist (within our own century) said: " The spirit of liberty is the spirit which is not too sure that it is right; the spirit of liberty is the spirit which seeks to understand the minds of other men and women; the spirit of liberty is the spirit which weighs their interests alongside its own without bias; the
spirit of liberty remembers that not even a sparrow falls to earth unheeded; the spirit of liberty is the spirit of Him who, near 2000 years ago, taught mankind that lesson it has never learned, but has never quite forgotten; that there is a kingdom where the least shall be heard and considered side by side with the greatest."
....

#130 From: "jail4judges" <jail4judges@...>
Date: Tue Jul 25, 2000 12:16 am
Subject: *** Judicial Change On The Horizon
jail4judges@...
Send Email Send Email
 
(Be sure to read the comments* below the article)
 
High Court Ruling
May Rewrite Sentencing
 
    A largely overlooked U.S. Supreme Court decision has called into question the sentences of tens of thousands of federal prisoners and threatens to swamp prosecutors and the court system with thousands of appeals.
    The seemingly isolated ruling struck down a New Jersey hate crimes law that increased prison time for conduct never considered by a jury. But last week, a U.S. appeals court ruled that the same principle applies in thousands of federal drug cases, and analysts believe that dozens of other state and
federal statutes may be unconstitutional based on the ruling.
    In the long run, some analysts and prosecutors say, the June 26 decision also could jeopardize federal sentencing guidelines and similar state systems.
    "Everybody and their brother is going to challenge their sentence, as well they should," said University of Texas law professor Susan Klein, a former federal prosecutor. She and a colleague have identified 39 federal and 20 state laws that may be unconstitutional under the decision. "It's just going to be
a disaster."
    Indeed, the U.S. Department of Justice convened an emergency committee to study the ramifications, defense attorneys are using the case in their appeals, and federal circuit courts around the country are bracing for a flood of new  cases.
    At issue in the 5 to 4 decision in Apprendi v. New Jersey is how much leeway judges have in sentencing defendants to additional time based on facts that were not part of a criminal indictment and were never voted on by a jury. The court ruled that the Sixth Amendment bars judges from going above the statutory maximum sentence by using such extra evidence, which may include motive, weapon used or volume of drugs sold.
    That case--and the high court's June 29 decision to send a Colorado drug case back for reconsideration--gives hope to many of the 61,000 federal prisoners serving drug-related sentences. Thousands of other state and federal sentences
may be too long as well.
    "It's a case of enormous potential importance and we're going to have to spend a lot of time dealing with it," said Edward R. Becker, chief judge of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit, which covers New Jersey, Delaware and
Pennsylvania.
    Locally, the 4th Circuit, which covers Virginia, Maryland and three other states, has at least five appeals under consideration based on the decision.
    Federal judges and prosecutors are beginning to handle jury instructions and grand jury indictments differently to take into account the new standard.
    Helen F. Fahey, the U.S. attorney for Eastern Virginia, said she expects her office to handle an enormous number of so-called Apprendi appeals. "We'll be spending more time working cases that we have already done rather than new cases
coming in the door," she said.
    Nationally, the Justice Department is also assessing the impact. The decision drew little public attention initially because it was handed down the same week as rulings in long-awaited cases such as the one that upheld Miranda warnings about the right to remain silent during police interrogation, one
that rejected a Nebraska law prohibiting what opponents call "partial birth" abortions and a third that said the Boy Scouts of America have a right to bar gays.
    In Apprendi, the Supreme Court found that, on its face, the New Jersey law was unconstitutional because it allowed a judge to give a defendant more time on a firearms charge than the statutory maximum after finding that the crime was racially motivated.
    The implications are much broader, judges, lawyers and analysts agree. "Other than the fact of a prior conviction, any fact that increases the penalty for a crime beyond the prescribed statutory maximum must be submitted to a jury, and proved beyond a reasonable doubt," said the decision written by Justice John Paul Stevens.
    That principle is only fair, say defense attorneys, who have argued for years that it is wrong to give their clients more time based on evidence never considered by a jury.
    "Right now, you can be sentenced for conduct you've been acquitted of, if the judge rules it is true by preponderance of the evidence," said Alexandria lawyer James Clark. "The only thing that's a mystery to me is that the Supreme Court has taken so long to do something about it."
    Last week, the 8th Circuit Court--the first federal appeals court to consider the issue--found that the new rules in Apprendi apply to federal drug cases.
    Under current practices, drug sentences are determined largely by the amount and kind of drugs involved, but juries usually decide only whether a defendant has sold or possessed drugs. A judge then decides the quantities based on a
presentence report from a probation officer.
    That system is unconstitutional when the drug amounts bump up the potential maximum sentence, the 8th Circuit Court found.
    That could be good news for Marion Promise, 45, who is serving a 30-year sentence in a federal prison in South Carolina. Promise was convicted last year based on the  testimony of other drug dealers and was never caught with cocaine, according to court records.
    His attorney appealed based on a footnote in a 1999 Supreme Court carjacking case. "We argued that the amount of cocaine he was held responsible for was a jury issue,"
said attorney Gary Murphy.
    The 4th Circuit rejected that claim in June--two weeks before the Supreme Court made that same footnote the centerpiece of the majority opinion in Apprendi.
    Now Murphy has asked the Richmond-based appeals court to reconsider. Murphy isn't the only one jumping on the issue. Greenbelt lawyer Fred Warren Bennett said he recently received a call from a former client, now incarcerated, asking him to file an appeal based on the case. "It's spreading like
wildfire in the federal prison system," Bennett said. "There's going to be a lot of litigation."
    Virginia Beach lawyer Keith Kimball has filed Apprendi-related appeals on behalf of three clients, arguing that their convictions--as well as their sentences--are invalid because the jury never ruled on specific drug amounts.
    Fahey, whose office is responding to Kimball's cases, said she believes that most drug sentences will eventually be upheld because relatively few sentences exceed the statutory  maximums. She also said her office is taking steps to ensure
that new cases conform to last month's decision.
    Two weeks ago, prosecutors in Alexandria asked U.S. District Judge Leonie M. Brinkema to tell jurors that they needed to decide specifically whether Darwyn Payne possessed five grams or more of cocaine. The jury convicted him, and Brinkema publicly praised the prosecutors for addressing the issues raised by Apprendi.
    The case will have less of an impact on state court cases in Maryland and Virginia, officials said. In Maryland, juries determine drug amounts, and Virginia is one of the few states where juries--rather than judges--set the maximum penalty. *
    The District is awaiting guidance from the Justice Department on Apprendi's impact, said Channing Phillips, spokesman for the U.S. attorney's office. Some legal scholars believe that the Apprendi case may be the beginning of a  revolution in criminal sentencing. **
    At least two justices--Clarence Thomas and Antonin Scalia--said in concurrences that they want juries to rule on all facts that increase prison time, not just those that push a sentence past a statutory maximum. That position could undercut
mandatory sentencing guidelines that provide for increased penalties based on factors determined by a judge rather than a jury.
    The court majority specifically chose not to address the issue of sentencing guidelines, but if Thomas and Scalia can get three more votes, most federal sentences handed down since 1987--and many state sentences--could be invalid.
Issues such as increased time for harming vulnerable victims and longer sentences for abusing a position of responsibility might then have to go to a jury rather than a judge, analysts said.
    That would cause chaos, said the dissenting Supreme Court justices. "Jury determination of all sentencing related facts . . . unless restricted, threatens the workability of every criminal justice system . . . [and] threatens efforts to make those systems more uniform" with sentencing guidelines, wrote
Stephen G. Breyer, an early member of the U.S. Sentencing Commission.
    But William W. Wilkins Jr., the commission's first chairman, said he believes that the guidelines will survive. "My reading of Apprendi leads me to conclude this decision will not have a dramatic effect," said Wilkins, a 4th Circuit Court judge. "It does not apply to many factors found in the guidelines, such
as role in the offense."
    What happens next remains to be seen. "Maybe the justices have reached their fill just as the prisons have reached theirs," said Alexandria defense attorney John Zwerling. "They're starting to realize that you can't put everybody in prison for their rest of their lives."

 
* Once JAIL becomes the law of this nation, there will be precedence set for juries, not judges, to be the sole determiner of sentences. JAIL specifically sets forth in paragraph (r) in relation to sentencing judges, "Indictment.  .... Upon conviction, the special trial jury shall have exclusive power of sentencing (limited to incarceration, fines and/or community service), which shall be derived by an average of the sentences of the trial jurors." Once the judges are sentenced by the jurors, not judges, in all states due to the passage of JAIL, the argument may be raised that citizens should also have the same right to be sentenced by the jurors, not judges.
 
** Branson's Predictions:  What we all are going to see happening is more and more decisions out of the courts that uphold the constitutional rights of the People. We shall also see more and more State Judiciary Commissions being judges up on misconduct charges. There records to date are atrocious. The reason for new the action is simple; because the judiciary is fast catching on that the People are indeed collectively gathering across this nation at an alarming rate for judicial accountability, and the judges know that the only way to attempt to disarm this rising movement in America is to show there is no need for it. JAIL will make all State Judicial Commissions as irrelevant as one asking if the moon is shining at 12 noon. Everyone please take note this day, 7/24/00, and see if Branson's predictions do not come to pass!
 
J.A.I.L.  (Judicial Accountability Initiative Law)
Use header to subscribe/remove: jail4judges@...
JAIL is a unique addition to our form of government.
JAIL is powerful! It is dynamic! It is America's ONLY hope!
Visit JAIL's informative websites, www.jail4judges.org (& .net)
Other egroups may sign on at jail4judges@egroups.com
JAIL's message is spreading across this nation vociferously!
Support JAIL @ P.O. Box 207, No. Hollywood, CA 91603
 
"..it does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate,
tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds.."
                                                 --Samuel Adams     
"There are a thousand hacking at the branches of evil to one
who is striking at the root."   -- Henry David Thoreau    <><
______________________________________________

#131 From: "jail4judges" <jail4judges@...>
Date: Tue Jul 25, 2000 12:24 am
Subject: Judiciary Change On The Horizon
jail4judges@...
Send Email Send Email
 
 
(Be sure to read the comments* below the article)
 
High Court Ruling
May Rewrite Sentencing
 
    A largely overlooked U.S. Supreme Court decision has called into question the sentences of tens of thousands of federal prisoners and threatens to swamp prosecutors and the court system with thousands of appeals.
    The seemingly isolated ruling struck down a New Jersey hate crimes law that increased prison time for conduct never considered by a jury. But last week, a U.S. appeals court ruled that the same principle applies in thousands of federal drug cases, and analysts believe that dozens of other state and
federal statutes may be unconstitutional based on the ruling.
    In the long run, some analysts and prosecutors say, the June 26 decision also could jeopardize federal sentencing guidelines and similar state systems.
    "Everybody and their brother is going to challenge their sentence, as well they should," said University of Texas law professor Susan Klein, a former federal prosecutor. She and a colleague have identified 39 federal and 20 state laws that may be unconstitutional under the decision. "It's just going to be
a disaster."
    Indeed, the U.S. Department of Justice convened an emergency committee to study the ramifications, defense attorneys are using the case in their appeals, and federal circuit courts around the country are bracing for a flood of new  cases.
    At issue in the 5 to 4 decision in Apprendi v. New Jersey is how much leeway judges have in sentencing defendants to additional time based on facts that were not part of a criminal indictment and were never voted on by a jury. The court ruled that the Sixth Amendment bars judges from going above the statutory maximum sentence by using such extra evidence, which may include motive, weapon used or volume of drugs sold.
    That case--and the high court's June 29 decision to send a Colorado drug case back for reconsideration--gives hope to many of the 61,000 federal prisoners serving drug-related sentences. Thousands of other state and federal sentences
may be too long as well.
    "It's a case of enormous potential importance and we're going to have to spend a lot of time dealing with it," said Edward R. Becker, chief judge of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit, which covers New Jersey, Delaware and
Pennsylvania.
    Locally, the 4th Circuit, which covers Virginia, Maryland and three other states, has at least five appeals under consideration based on the decision.
    Federal judges and prosecutors are beginning to handle jury instructions and grand jury indictments differently to take into account the new standard.
    Helen F. Fahey, the U.S. attorney for Eastern Virginia, said she expects her office to handle an enormous number of so-called Apprendi appeals. "We'll be spending more time working cases that we have already done rather than new cases
coming in the door," she said.
    Nationally, the Justice Department is also assessing the impact. The decision drew little public attention initially because it was handed down the same week as rulings in long-awaited cases such as the one that upheld Miranda warnings about the right to remain silent during police interrogation, one
that rejected a Nebraska law prohibiting what opponents call "partial birth" abortions and a third that said the Boy Scouts of America have a right to bar gays.
    In Apprendi, the Supreme Court found that, on its face, the New Jersey law was unconstitutional because it allowed a judge to give a defendant more time on a firearms charge than the statutory maximum after finding that the crime was racially motivated.
    The implications are much broader, judges, lawyers and analysts agree. "Other than the fact of a prior conviction, any fact that increases the penalty for a crime beyond the prescribed statutory maximum must be submitted to a jury, and proved beyond a reasonable doubt," said the decision written by Justice John Paul Stevens.
    That principle is only fair, say defense attorneys, who have argued for years that it is wrong to give their clients more time based on evidence never considered by a jury.
    "Right now, you can be sentenced for conduct you've been acquitted of, if the judge rules it is true by preponderance of the evidence," said Alexandria lawyer James Clark. "The only thing that's a mystery to me is that the Supreme Court has taken so long to do something about it."
    Last week, the 8th Circuit Court--the first federal appeals court to consider the issue--found that the new rules in Apprendi apply to federal drug cases.
    Under current practices, drug sentences are determined largely by the amount and kind of drugs involved, but juries usually decide only whether a defendant has sold or possessed drugs. A judge then decides the quantities based on a
presentence report from a probation officer.
    That system is unconstitutional when the drug amounts bump up the potential maximum sentence, the 8th Circuit Court found.
    That could be good news for Marion Promise, 45, who is serving a 30-year sentence in a federal prison in South Carolina. Promise was convicted last year based on the  testimony of other drug dealers and was never caught with cocaine, according to court records.
    His attorney appealed based on a footnote in a 1999 Supreme Court carjacking case. "We argued that the amount of cocaine he was held responsible for was a jury issue,"
said attorney Gary Murphy.
    The 4th Circuit rejected that claim in June--two weeks before the Supreme Court made that same footnote the centerpiece of the majority opinion in Apprendi.
    Now Murphy has asked the Richmond-based appeals court to reconsider. Murphy isn't the only one jumping on the issue. Greenbelt lawyer Fred Warren Bennett said he recently received a call from a former client, now incarcerated, asking him to file an appeal based on the case. "It's spreading like
wildfire in the federal prison system," Bennett said. "There's going to be a lot of litigation."
    Virginia Beach lawyer Keith Kimball has filed Apprendi-related appeals on behalf of three clients, arguing that their convictions--as well as their sentences--are invalid because the jury never ruled on specific drug amounts.
    Fahey, whose office is responding to Kimball's cases, said she believes that most drug sentences will eventually be upheld because relatively few sentences exceed the statutory  maximums. She also said her office is taking steps to ensure
that new cases conform to last month's decision.
    Two weeks ago, prosecutors in Alexandria asked U.S. District Judge Leonie M. Brinkema to tell jurors that they needed to decide specifically whether Darwyn Payne possessed five grams or more of cocaine. The jury convicted him, and Brinkema publicly praised the prosecutors for addressing the issues raised by Apprendi.
    The case will have less of an impact on state court cases in Maryland and Virginia, officials said. In Maryland, juries determine drug amounts, and Virginia is one of the few states where juries--rather than judges--set the maximum penalty. *
    The District is awaiting guidance from the Justice Department on Apprendi's impact, said Channing Phillips, spokesman for the U.S. attorney's office. Some legal scholars believe that the Apprendi case may be the beginning of a  revolution in criminal sentencing. **
    At least two justices--Clarence Thomas and Antonin Scalia--said in concurrences that they want juries to rule on all facts that increase prison time, not just those that push a sentence past a statutory maximum. That position could undercut
mandatory sentencing guidelines that provide for increased penalties based on factors determined by a judge rather than a jury.
    The court majority specifically chose not to address the issue of sentencing guidelines, but if Thomas and Scalia can get three more votes, most federal sentences handed down since 1987--and many state sentences--could be invalid.
Issues such as increased time for harming vulnerable victims and longer sentences for abusing a position of responsibility might then have to go to a jury rather than a judge, analysts said.
    That would cause chaos, said the dissenting Supreme Court justices. "Jury determination of all sentencing related facts . . . unless restricted, threatens the workability of every criminal justice system . . . [and] threatens efforts to make those systems more uniform" with sentencing guidelines, wrote
Stephen G. Breyer, an early member of the U.S. Sentencing Commission.
    But William W. Wilkins Jr., the commission's first chairman, said he believes that the guidelines will survive. "My reading of Apprendi leads me to conclude this decision will not have a dramatic effect," said Wilkins, a 4th Circuit Court judge. "It does not apply to many factors found in the guidelines, such
as role in the offense."
    What happens next remains to be seen. "Maybe the justices have reached their fill just as the prisons have reached theirs," said Alexandria defense attorney John Zwerling. "They're starting to realize that you can't put everybody in prison for their rest of their lives."

 
* Once JAIL becomes the law of this nation, there will be precedence set for juries, not judges, to be the sole determiner of sentences. JAIL specifically sets forth in paragraph (r) in relation to sentencing judges, "Indictment.  .... Upon conviction, the special trial jury shall have exclusive power of sentencing (limited to incarceration, fines and/or community service), which shall be derived by an average of the sentences of the trial jurors." Once the judges are sentenced by the jurors, not judges, in all states due to the passage of JAIL, the argument may be raised that citizens should also have the same right to be sentenced by the jurors, not judges.
 
** Branson's Predictions:  What we all are going to see happening is more and more decisions out of the courts that uphold the constitutional rights of the People. We shall also see more and more State Judiciary Commissions being judges up on misconduct charges. There records to date are atrocious. The reason for new the action is simple; because the judiciary is fast catching on that the People are indeed collectively gathering across this nation at an alarming rate for judicial accountability, and the judges know that the only way to attempt to disarm this rising movement in America is to show there is no need for it. JAIL will make all State Judicial Commissions as irrelevant as one asking if the moon is shining at 12 noon. Everyone please take note this day, 7/24/00, and see if Branson's predictions do not come to pass!
 
J.A.I.L.  (Judicial Accountability Initiative Law)
Use header to subscribe/remove: jail4judges@...
JAIL is a unique addition to our form of government.
JAIL is powerful! It is dynamic! It is America's ONLY hope!
Visit JAIL's informative websites, www.jail4judges.org (& .net)
Other egroups may sign on at jail4judges@egroups.com
JAIL's message is spreading across this nation vociferously!
Support JAIL @ P.O. Box 207, No. Hollywood, CA 91603
 
"..it does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate,
tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds.."
                                                 --Samuel Adams     
"There are a thousand hacking at the branches of evil to one
who is striking at the root."   -- Henry David Thoreau    <><
______________________________________________


#132 From: "jail4judges" <jail4judges@...>
Date: Tue Jul 25, 2000 2:49 am
Subject: Fw: JAIL
jail4judges@...
Send Email Send Email
 
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, July 22, 2000 4:20 PM
Subject: JAIL

I have been personally involved with many issues beginning in the 60's with draft card burning and the list continues.

Two important things I have learned are:

1) Many excellent projects have failed simply because people fail to see the real benefits of a worthy cause succeeding because they cannot separate their causes and issues from the direction that could be taken as an addition and supplement to their own cause, so they continue to bog down the process of an excellent idea with the infighting, continuing disagreements and fail to see that, in many ways, we are all saying the same thing only with different words and issues: We all want a government that is fair, honest, and just.

2) It may not be always true in every situation, but I have learned that one of the best ways to get what you want is to help others get what they want, first. Once they have what they want/need/had to have, they will then have the free time left over to assist you and appreciate that you once helped them get what they wanted/needed/had to have.

It goes without saying that I view the government of having done this exactly this way, let the people have, light switches, jobs, cars, refrigerators, running water, 12 packs, and many other conveniences and very few will not want anything more and rarely protest. Once this is accomplished the government is free to do what it wants to those who will resist and protest while the majority could not be any more indifferent to what the government does in the name of due process. As long as people believe that convenience is freedom, those of us who demand freedom and justice will have many opponents who have given up their freedoms for conveniences and have no idea that they are one of the causes of the people losing their freedoms, and rights, by default. These people will not complain, or resist, or even think about it until injustice visits them personally.  In this view I cannot help but realize that we do have the government we deserve and, in fact, we as a people, have actually earned this type of government.

I view J.A.I.L.  as an issue that may possibly get the many other balls rolling that I have worked on and all I have to do is support J.A.I.L. AS IT IS AND IT WILL WORK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Afterwards my other causes will have an easier path of less resistance.

J.A.I.L. is important for many reasons.

1) It is one of the best concepts I have seen anyone present.

2) It will most definitely have a "trickle down" effect that will continue to benefit many other causes and all that has to be done to start this is get J.A.I.L. on the books as the law.

3) Until anyone can come up with a better idea I can see that the sole issue of getting J.A.I.L. on the books can only benefit everyone, and their causes, but J.A.I.L. has to be the on the books first for that door to open and possibly remain open for these other issues.

4) If you personally have another cause [which I also do have many] then it is the utmost importance to realize that J.A.I.L. is yet another tool that has been made available for you to reach these other goals.

My Best Regards to All,

Terry L. Fesler
http://www.angelfire.com/mi/oaxamaxao/index.html

jail4judges wrote:

 Dear Lori:    I have purposely stayed out of any fray and infighting for good reason. I cannot and will not micro-manage every aspect that comes up among JAILers. But when it comes to the JAIL movement itself, and its focus, I must make that position very clear. JAIL's focus must be LIMITED to JUDICIAL accountability, as the name indicates.  It's not called "government accountability."  I have explained that I find that our focus must be limited to whomever comes under the umbrella of judicial immunity, and that's not just judges. That umbrella has been expanded to cover anyone remotely connected with the judicial system, including court clerks.    The JAIL Initiative starts out "(a) Preamble. We, the People of California (or whatever state adopts JAIL), find that the doctrine of judicial immunity has been greatly abused, and when judges abuse their power, the people are obliged - it is their duty - to correct that injury, for the benefit of themselves and their posterity. In order to ensure judicial accountability and domestic tranquility, we hereby amend Article I of our Constitution with these provisions, which shall be known as "The Judicial Accountability Amendment."    That preamble describes the parameters of JAIL. It centers on "the doctrine of judicial immunity," the judicial abuse of which requires JAIL. That is the sole purpose of JAIL-- to end the abuse of that doctrine. That necessarily limits JAIL to the judiciary "which shall be known as the JUDICIAL Accountability Amendment."    As the author of JAIL, that was my intention when I wrote it, and is still my intention now, and will remain so. It is my contention that the People must first concentrate on judicial abuse, and with that under control, the rest of government will be affected thereby and will bring lawyers, executives, legislators, agents, even corporate execs, into line. To whatever degree they may require additional measures after JAIL is in effect, those measures can then be pursued.    But I will not allow the JAIL parameters and mission to be watered down with further expansion. I have expressed my firm belief that anything beyond the stated scope of JAIL serves as a distraction to the objectives of which JAIL is specifically designed to accomplish. I receive emails urging me to expand the scope of JAIL, especially to lawyers and legislators. However, I find that not only unnecessary, but moreover, counter-productive.    I realize that, as human beings, we can't all agree with one another 100 percent. There are those that even support JAIL who don't agree with me totally. I have to expect that. But one thing peculiar to me is, I am the one who wrote JAIL based on the purpose I had in mind (and still do).    I've had many excellent people who have helped me improve the wording and include all that was necessary to the stated scope and purpose of JAIL, for which I am truly grateful. I couldn't have "perfected" it without them. There are still some details that may have to be adjusted in the future, but the scope of JAIL will not be expanded.    The scope of JAIL is pretty well explained in my recent email article "Keeping Focused."  Not everyone agrees with my position, and a few have expressed their disagreement, including Jacob Roginsky. Some have even said that "JAIL won't work -- we have to start shooting -- we've already tried everything else."  Well, we haven't tried JAIL yet, as there has been nothing like it in prior existence. The system disciplinary agencies for judges don't work, for that reason-- they're part of the system and have a conflict of interest. The Grand Juries we have now aren't allowed to operate with the autonomous power they have, and furthermore, they are limited to the Counties they "serve." We don't have statewide Grand Juries.    I am not saying that JAIL can't be part of another effort that is compatible with our objective. All I am saying is, please respect the limited scope and purpose of JAIL as is stated in the Preamble of the Initiative itself.    Thanks for all of your help and dedication. God bless.-Ron Branson-

#133 From: "jail4judges" <jail4judges@...>
Date: Wed Jul 26, 2000 7:55 am
Subject: Owed To The Spell Checker
jail4judges@...
Send Email Send Email
 

Owed to the Spell Checker

    I have a spelling checker -
    It came with my PC.
    It plane lee marks four my revue
    Miss steaks aye can knot sea.
    Eye ran this poem threw it,
    Your sure reel glad two no.
    Its vary polished in it's weigh,
    My checker tolled me sew.
    A checker is a bless sing,
    It freeze yew lodes of thyme.
    It helps me right awl stiles two reed,
    And aides me when aye rime.
    To rite with care is quite a feet
    Of witch won should be proud.
    And wee mussed dew the best wee can,
    Sew flaws are knot aloud.
    And now bee cause my spelling
    Is checked with such grate flare,
    Their are know faults with in my cite,
    Of nun eye am a wear.
    Each frays come posed up on my screen
    Eye trussed to bee a joule
    The checker poured o'er every word
    To cheque sum spelling rule.
    That's why aye brake in two averse
    By righting wants too pleas.
    Sow now ewe sea why aye dew prays
    Such soft wear for pea seas

~~ anonymouse



J.A.I.L.  (Judicial Accountability Initiative Law)
Use header to subscribe/remove: jail4judges@...
JAIL is a unique addition to our form of government.
JAIL is powerful! It is dynamic! It is America's ONLY hope!
Visit JAIL's informative websites, www.jail4judges.org (& .net)
Other egroups may sign on at jail4judges@egroups.com
JAIL's message is spreading across this nation vociferously!
Support JAIL @ P.O. Box 207, No. Hollywood, CA 91603
 
"..it does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate,
tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds.."
                                                 --Samuel Adams     
"There are a thousand hacking at the branches of evil to one
who is striking at the root."   -- Henry David Thoreau    <><
______________________________________________

#134 From: "jail4judges" <jail4judges@...>
Date: Wed Jul 26, 2000 8:40 am
Subject: "A Picture is Worth ..."
jail4judges@...
Send Email Send Email
 
 
 
 

#135 From: "jail4judges" <jail4judges@...>
Date: Wed Jul 26, 2000 8:23 am
Subject: New JAIL Website - New Jersey
jail4judges@...
Send Email Send Email
 
 

PROPOSED NEW JERSEY CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT
Judicial Accountability Initiative Law
(J.A.I.L.) Jail for Judges


The following proposed draft Amendment to the New Jersey Constitution is based on an initiative that has started in California and is an excellent idea that is long overdue and should be passed on the federal level and for all 50 states. Hopefully, there will be a similar initiative in the State of New Jersey for which this Constitutional Amendment will be placed on the ballot for New Jersey  voters to decide whether, or not, Jail for Judges should become the law.

One of the main arguments against this law will be that there are plenty of "safeguards" already built into our current laws and court rules, which is true only to a point. The Attorney General's Office and the Appeals and Supreme Court's of the State of New Jersey  refuse to comply with their fiduciary obligations to assure that judges remain impartial and obey the law.

Based on my personal experiences what really happens in the court of appeals when confronted with a questionable lower court decision and/or conduct is that the court of appeals ignores it as completely as possible. These protections and safeguards are only a matter of written court rule and law which is there for the sole purpose of being able to say: "Well these "safeguards" are in place! There is no need for a constitutional amendment for something that already exists!" 

The truth is, there is nothing in place to hold judges accountable for deliberately refusing to take notice of current laws and rules, nor for their on-going suborning of perjury, constitutional and due process violations in addition to violations of the Separation of Powers Doctrine. 

The need for this amendment is that  the Appellate Courts and the New Jersey  Supreme Court have far too long ignored common sense and due process as intended by the rule of law, the applicable New Jersey Court Rules, Rules of Evidence, Administrative Codes and the constitution. Judges in the lower courts do as they please with little oversight and investigation which is entrusted to the higher courts who too often ratify the unlawful acts and decisions of the lower courts.

When the Judicial Accountability Initiative eventually passes the people will finally begin to believe that there is no excuse for the conduct of some judges. This is now the law and judicial accountability makes as much sense as holding anyone accountable and taking responsibility for their actions.

The first step is to become aware of  "How a Bill Becomes a Law in New Jersey." 
Send copies of the below Proposed Law to all your representatives. Click NJ Representatives to access their site.  


PROPOSED
Judicial Accountability
Initiative Law for New Jersey

(J.A.I.L.)
Jail for Judges

(a) Preamble. We, the People of the State of New Jersey, find that the doctrine of judicial immunity has been greatly abused; and when judges abuse their power, the people are obliged - it is their duty - to correct that injury, for the benefit of themselves and their posterity. In order to ensure judicial accountability and domestic tranquility, we hereby amend Article I of our Constitution with these provisions, which shall be known as "The Judicial Accountability Amendment."

(b) Definitions. For purposes of this amendment:

1. The term "blocking" shall mean any act that impedes the lawful conclusion of a case, to include unreasonable delay and willful rendering of a void judgment or order.

2. The term "judge" shall mean justice, judge, magistrate, commissioner, judge pro tem, private judge, judicial mediator, arbitrator and referee, and every person shielded by judicial immunity.

3. The term "Juror" shall mean a Special Grand Juror.

4. The term "seat" shall mean a situs and facility that is suitable for usage by the Jury.

5. The term "strike" shall mean an adverse immunity decision. Where appropriate, the singular shall include the plural.

(c) Immunity. Notwithstanding common law or any other provision to the contrary, no immunities shall be extended to any judge of this State except as is specifically set forth in this Amendment. Preserving the purpose of protecting judges from frivolous and harassing actions, no immunity shielding a judge shall be construed to extend to any deliberate violation of law, fraud or conspiracy, intentional violation of due process of law, deliberate disregard of material facts, judicial acts without jurisdiction, blocking of a lawful conclusion of a case, or any deliberate violation of the Constitutions of New Jersey  or the United States.

(d) Special Grand Juries. There are hereby created within this State three twenty-five member Special Grand Juries with statewide jurisdiction having power to judge both law and fact. This body shall exist independent of statutes governing county grand juries. Their responsibility shall be limited to determining, on an objective standard, whether a civil suit against a judge would be frivolous and harassing, or fall within the exclusions of immunity as set forth herein, and whether there is probable cause of criminal conduct by the judge complained of.

(e) Professional Counsel. Each Special Grand Jury shall have exclusive power to retain non-governmental advisors, special prosecutors, and investigators, as needed, who shall serve no longer than one year, after which term said officers shall be ineligible. Notwithstanding the one year, a special prosecutor may be retained to prosecute current cases in which they are involved through all appeals and any complaints for judicial misconduct.

(f) Establishment of Special Grand Jury Seats. Within ninety days following the ratification of this Amendment, the Legislature shall provide a seat for each Special Grand Jury. No seat shall be located within a mile of any judicial body, and each seat shall be reasonably placed proportionately according to population throughout the State. Should the Legislature fail to so act within ninety days, its members shall permanently forfeit their salaries and per diem pay, beginning on the ninety-first day, until such time that it abides by the terms of this (f) section.

(g) Annual Funding. The Legislature shall cause to be deducted two and nine-tenths percent from the gross judicial salaries of all judges, which amount shall be deposited regularly into the exclusive trust account created by this Amendment in paragraph (k) for its operational expenses, together with filing fees under paragraph (h), surcharges under paragraph (i), forfeited benefits of disciplined judges under paragraph (q), and fines imposed under paragraph (r).

(h) Filing Fees. Parties filing a civil complaint or answer before the Special Grand Jury, when represented by an attorney, shall at the time of filing pay a fee equal to the filing fee due in a civil appeal to the State Supreme Court. Individuals filing a civil complaint or answer before the Special Grand Jury in their own behalf as a matter of right, shall, at the time of filing, post a fee of fifty dollars, or file a declaration, which shall remain confidential, stating they are impoverished and unable to pay and/or object to such fee.

(i) Surcharges. Should this Amendment lack sufficient funding through its fines, fees, and forfeitures (including deductions in paragraph (g)), the Legislature shall impose appropriate surcharges upon the civil court filing fees of corporate litigants as necessary to make this Amendment self-supporting.

(j) Compensation of Jurors. Each Juror shall receive a salary commensurate to a Superior Court judge prorated according to the number of days actually served.

(k) Annual Budget. The Special Grand Juries shall have an annual operational budget commensurate to double the combined salaries of the seventy-five Jurors serving full time, which sum shall be initially deposited by the Legislature into an exclusive trust account to be annually administered by the State Controller. Should the trust balance, within any budget year, drop to less than an amount equivalent to the annual gross salaries of fifty Superior Court judges, the State Controller shall so notify the Legislature which shall replenish the account, prorated based on the actual average expenditures during the budget year. Should the trust balance in any subsequent year exceed the annual operational budget at the beginning of a new budget year, the State Controller shall return such excess to the state treasury.

(l) Jurisdiction. Each Special Grand Jury shall have exclusive power to establish rules assuring their attendance, to provide internal discipline, and to remove any of its members on grounds of misconduct. The Special Grand Jury shall immediately assign a docket number to each complaint brought before it, unless such case is transferred to another Special Grand Jury to achieve caseload balance. A transfer shall not prejudice a docketing deadline. The Special Grand Jury first docketing a complaint shall have sole jurisdiction of the case. Except as provided in paragraphs (s) and (w), no complaint of misconduct shall be considered by any Special Grand Jury unless the complainant shall have first attempted to exhaust all judicial remedies available in this State within the immediately preceding six-month period. Such six-month period, however, shall not commence in complaints of prior fraud or blocking of a lawful conclusion until after the date the Special Grand Juries become functional. This provision applies remedially and retroactively. Should the complainant opt to proceed to the United States Supreme Court, such six-month period shall commence upon the disposition by that court.

(m) Qualifications of Jurors. A Juror shall be thirty years of age, and have been nine years a citizen of the United States, and have been an inhabitant of New Jersey  for two years immediately prior to having his/her name drawn. Those not eligible for Special Grand Jury service shall include elected and appointed officials, members of the State Bar, judges (active or retired), judicial, prosecutorial and law enforcement personnel, without other exclusion except previous adjudication of mental incapacity, imprisonment, or parole from a conviction of a felonious crime against persons.

(n) Selection of Jurors. The Jurors shall serve without compulsion and shall be drawn by public lot by the Secretary of State from names on the voters rolls and any citizen submitting his/her name to the Secretary of State for such drawing.

(o) Service of Jurors. Excluding the establishment of the initial Special Grand Juries, each Juror shall serve one year. No Juror shall serve more than once. On the first day of each month, two persons shall be rotated off each Special Grand Jury and new Citizens seated, except in January it shall be three. Vacancies shall be filled on the first of the following month in addition to the Jurors regularly rotated, and the Juror chosen to fill a vacancy shall complete only the remainder of the term of the Juror replaced. A majority of thirteen shall determine any matter. Special Grand Jury files shall always remain public record following their final determination.

(p) Procedures. The Special Grand Jury shall serve a copy of the filed complaint upon the subject judge and notice to the complainant of such service. The judge shall have twenty days to serve and file an answer. The complainant shall have fifteen days to reply to the judge's answer. (Upon timely request, the Special Grand Jury may provide for extensions for good cause.) The Special Grand Jury shall have power to subpoena witnesses, documents, and other tangible evidence, and to examine witnesses under oath. Each Special Grand Jury shall determine the causes properly before it with their reasoned findings in writing within one hundred twenty (120) calendar days, serving on all parties their decision on whether immunity shall be barred as a defense to any civil action that may thereafter be pursued against the judge. A rehearing may be requested of the Special Grand Jury within fifteen days with service upon the opposition. Fifteen days shall be allowed to reply thereto. Thereafter, the Special Grand Jury shall render final determination within thirty days. All allegations of the complaint shall be liberally construed in favor of the complainant. The Jurors shall keep in mind, in making their decisions, that they are entrusted by the People of this State with the duty of restoring a perception of justice and accountability of the judiciary, and are not to be swayed by artful presentation by the judge. They shall avoid all influence by judicial and government entities. The statute of limitations on any civil suit brought pursuant to this Amendment against a State judge shall not commence until the rendering of a final decision by the Special Grand Jury.

(q) Removal. Whenever any judge has received three strikes, the judge shall be permanently removed from office, and thereafter shall not serve in any State judicial office, including that of private judge. Judicial retirement for such removed judge shall not exceed one-half of the benefits to which such person would have otherwise been entitled. Retirement shall not avert third strike penalties.

(r) Indictment. Should the Special Grand Jury also find probable cause of criminal conduct on the part of any judge against whom a complaint is docketed, it shall have the power to indict such judge except where double jeopardy attaches. The Special Grand Jury shall, without voir dire beyond personal relationship, cause to be impaneled twelve special trial jurors, plus alternates, which trial jurors shall be instructed that they have power to judge both law and fact. The Special Grand Jury shall also select a non-governmental special prosecutor and a judge with no more than four years on the bench from a county other than that of the defendant judge.

The trial jury shall be selected from the same pool of jury candidates as any regular jury. The special prosecutor shall thereafter prosecute the cause to a conclusion, having all the powers of any other prosecutor within this State. Upon conviction, the special trial jury shall have exclusive power of sentencing (limited to incarceration, fines and/or community service), which shall be derived by an average of the sentences of the trial jurors.

(s) Criminal Procedures. In addition to any other provisions of this Amendment, a complaint for criminal conduct of a judge may be brought directly to the Special Grand Jury upon all the following prerequisites: (1) an affidavit of criminal conduct has been lodged with the appropriate prosecutorial entity within ninety (90) days of the commission of the alleged conduct; (2) the prosecutor declines to prosecute, or one hundred twenty (120) days has passed following the lodging of such affidavit and prosecution has not commenced; (3) an indictment, if sought, has not been specifically declined on the merits by a county Grand Jury; and (4) the criminal statute of limitations has not run. Any criminal conviction (including a plea bargain) under any judicial process shall constitute a strike.

(t) Public Indemnification. No judge complained of, or sued civilly by a complainant pursuant to this Amendment, shall be defended at public expense or by any elected or appointed public counsel, nor shall any judge be reimbursed from public funds for any losses sustained under this Amendment.

(u) Enforcement. No person exercising strict enforcement of the findings of a Special Grand Jury shall be held liable civilly, criminally, or in contempt.

(v) Redress. The provisions of this Amendment are in addition to other redress that may exist and are not mutually exclusive.

(w) Challenges to Amendment. No judge under the jurisdiction of the Special Grand Jury, or potentially affected by the outcome of a challenge to this Amendment, shall have any jurisdiction to sit in judgment of such challenge. Such pretended adjudication shall be null and void for all purposes and a complaint for such misconduct may be brought at any time, without charge, before the Special Grand Jury by class-action, or by any adversely affected person.

(x) Preeminence. Preeminence shall be given to this Amendment in any case of conflicts with statute, case law or constitutional provision. The foreperson of each Special Grand Jury shall read, or cause to be read, this Amendment to the respective Jurors semi-annually during the first week of business in January and July. Should any part of this Amendment be determined unconstitutional, the remainder shall remain in full force and effect as though no challenge thereto existed.

 

Anyone interested in getting involved with the New Jersey Judicial Accountability Constitutional Amendment please visit Jail4Judges links. Stay on the lookout as this page is updated.

Email Victims-of-Law to receive site updates.


WB01540_.gif (632 bytes)


Return to New Jersey Home Page

Return to New Jersey Legal Links Page

Return to Victims-of-Law Home Page

Midi: SUE ME -- Ted Keener

Please email to report any broken links, offer suggestions, or report status of contacts with Legislators.

penemail.gif (12803 bytes)

 

This Page was Inaugurated on 7/14/00, Updated on 7/15/00

DECEMBER 1997 VICTIMS-OF-LAW, All Rights Reserved

 

 

 


1


#136 From: "jail4judges" <jail4judges@...>
Date: Thu Jul 27, 2000 7:07 am
Subject: Government Huminism The Official Religion
jail4judges@...
Send Email Send Email
 
 
US vs IRS
Establishing an Official Religion
by Dr. GREG DIXON
drgregdixon@...
Indianapolis Baptist Temple
    David said, "In thee, O Lord, do I put my trust: let me
never be ashamed: deliver me in thy righteousness. Bow down
thine ear to me; deliver me speedily: be thou my strong
rock, for an house of defense to save me. For thou art my
rock and my fortress.; therefore for thy name's sake lead
me, and guide me. Pull me out of the net that they have laid
privily for me: for thou art my strength. (Ps. 31:1-4) What
blessed verses these are to my soul in this hour.
    The main purpose of this is to give you an update on our
ongoing battle with the forces of evil, namely the Clinton/
Gore/Reno Injustice Department. Just as the plot against
Daniel and Mordecai was uncovered, the real purpose of the
attack on the Indianapolis Baptist Temple and this preacher
has also now been revealed.
    At oral arguments before the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals in
Chicago, US Attorney Metzler said twice that an uncontrolled
church is untenable in society today. He also admitted that
if IBT had filed the forms we wouldn't have to pay FICA
taxes. So the issue is not about taxes but of submission and
control.
    Also through discovery in my personal case in which the US
is suing me for over $100,000 the IRS said: "Dr. Gregory J.
Dixon ... is a prominent local minister who has in the past
voiced his opposition to the Internal Revenue Service and to
government (both federal and state) in general.? Stanley
LaBuz, the IRS agent who signed the report also said that,
"The case file contains ... newspaper and magazine articles
on Dr. Dixon."
    Along with the accusation against Texe Marrs and Living
Truth Ministries in Austin, Texas which recently had their
tax exemption revoked by the IRS, we can now get a clear
picture of where all of this is heading. Among several
reasons for this action the IRS said that it appeared that
the Ministry didn't have any licensed counselors on staff.
    Also one of the sermon titles that they objected to was,
"Bible Prophecy and the Coming Conspiracy." This is a clear
attack on the Book of Revelation. Also the newspaper clippings that LaBuz mentioned were articles that the papers
had reported where I had stood against various social sins.
They included pornography, gambling, public education, the
right of parents to discipline their children, licensure of church ministries, and homosexual rights. So this onslaught against IBT is all about silencing the pulpits of America.
    As soon as the hate crimes legislation is in place preachers
will be charged criminally for such preaching. We have now
come full circle from pre-revolutionary times in America.
    For more than six years now our church has sustained one of the most savage attacks on a ministry since the establishing
of the First Amendment. Every organized institution in the
community is against us including most of the "Independent
Baptists." And yet our church has stayed together and
actually grown through the persecution which has been
unrelenting from the media. The biggest toll has been on our
school ministry. Just yesterday I learned that a Baptist school nearby has asked for the records of twenty of our students. Many of them say that they fear a raid of the church by the Federal Marshals.
    However until we hear from the 7th Circuit Court Of Appeals in Chicago we can't get out a letter. But neither can we
wait any longer to ask our friends for help. The cupboard is
down to the bare bones. We are under a Court Order to keep
the mortgage payments current and the buildings in repair.
We must make massive repairs on the High School roof. I just
borrowed enough to keep the legal team on board for another
week and sent it overnight.
    We have gone to our dear people over and over again. But we must keep them in reserve for when we go on to the Supreme Court. Yesterday I had come almost to the point of despair and then the Lord once again was the, "lifter up of my
head." It seemed that in spite of huge computer problems that He has led me to write to a few of our friends to see if they will help us over the present crisis. I thought of those four lepers who said, "Why sit we here until we die?'
    If you are a pastor who receives this, will you prayerfully
consider receiving a free will offering for our legal struggles after you receive all of your offerings for your needs tomorrow? If you are a lay- man who gets this, will you be so kind as to send the largest gift possible this week to help us? We would be eternally grateful. We are waging a battle for all of the preachers and churches in America. We must not lose, but their goal is to bleed us to death.
    So far everyone else for the most part have caved in. Pray
for us that we will not do this no matter what pressure they
bring to bear upon us. They are working night and day to
find something on me and my son. We must be mighty clean
because they sure know all about us. Also, will you be so
kind as to send this on to others?
    I know that God will do a great thing for us all through
this, and I am looking forward to hearing from you this
week. Our address is:
Indianapolis Baptist Temple 19th Judicial District 2711
South East Street Indianapolis, Indiana
Yours For A Free Church,
Bro. Greg Dixon

 
* What part of, "Congress shall make no law..." do you not understand? -  First Amendment of U.S. Constitution. - Ron

J.A.I.L.  (Judicial Accountability Initiative Law)
Use header to subscribe/remove: jail4judges@...
JAIL is a unique addition to our form of government.
JAIL is powerful! It is dynamic! It is America's ONLY hope!
Visit JAIL's informative websites, www.jail4judges.org (& .net)
Other egroups may sign on at jail4judges@egroups.com
JAIL's message is spreading across this nation vociferously!
Support JAIL @ P.O. Box 207, No. Hollywood, CA 91603
 
"..it does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate,
tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds.."
                                                 --Samuel Adams     
"There are a thousand hacking at the branches of evil to one
who is striking at the root."   -- Henry David Thoreau    <><
______________________________________________

#137 From: "jail4judges" <jail4judges@...>
Date: Thu Jul 27, 2000 8:57 pm
Subject: *** Meet General Brown ***
jail4judges@...
Send Email Send Email
 
 
MEET GENERAL BROWN
 
Pastor John:
 
    Your short letter brought tears to my eyes. Okay, you have asked how you can become a General, or be of help in this cause for freedom. I will now attempt to answer your question.
    First, I am thankful that you are not a "government authorized church," and that you take your orders directly from Christ, the Head of the Church. That fact resolves the question as to whom you owe your allegiance. (As you know, government churches are not allowed to influence "Lord Government." This is so because the Government is a jealous Government who will have no other gods before it, and certainly not the man "Christ!") Psalms 2.
    Oh, aren't I sarcastic? But that is my message when at the pulpit. But we're now talking about a church getting involved in nasty politics, a no-no. How dare you challenge the status quo and step out as a church into this forbidden territory. Hey, you might wake up sleeping pastors who might likewise rise up to follow your example. "If we leave him thus alone all men will believe..." (Jn.11:48). They can't allow that now, can they!         What if churches started breaking out of their lethargy and started a revival in this country. "No! No! We can't allow that. It just can't be. Go back to reading your Bible and praying."
    And what if the churches across America, regardless of their denominations, started taking up the cause of JAIL and told the government they've had enough, and insisted on JAIL, and nothing less! (Oh, my, sedition.) And what if the churches in mass declared their independence from Lord Government and said, "We will NOT bend, bow or burn!"
    All this to say, since Christ is your Head, would such a stand as this for your church be pleasing to your Lord. If "Yes," then the cost of such stand is irrelevant. Your choice is clear and not open for discussion! When you step out, there will be no turning back! Executing that choice will automatically make you "Honorable General Brown!" Your troops will gather behind you, and you will find an army beyond your dreams. Does that mean clear sailing to Victory? Absolutely not! And I don't believe I have to explain that.
    Details: Indiana, unfortunately, is not an initiative state, and therefore all efforts to make an amendment to your state's constitution must be done through your legislature. Eternal Grace Baptist Church should start by contacting JAIL's  current JAIL Advocate in Indiana, Sue Marie Coverdale, at injail4judges@... and making an acquaintance. Work with her and plan strategies on how to pursue your goal. Unlike  normal state legislation, the entire country is being broadsided with JAIL, giving legislators little choice.
    JAIL is involved in coalition gathering. JAIL is gaining more force and every greater inroads. As Pastor Brown leads his church into the front lines of the battle, he will be the first church to officially join JAIL's nationwide cause as a church. Presto - General Brown! Your stars await you.
    "There is no man that hath left house, or brethren, or sisters, or father, or mother, of wife, or children, or lands, for my sake, and the gospel's, But he shall receive an hundredfold now in this time, houses, and brethren, and sisters, and mothers, and children, and lands, with persecutions; and in the world to come eternal life." Mk.10: 29, 30.
    You have a whole army out here just waiting for your leadership, General Brown. "Wherefore seeing we also are compassed about with so great a cloud of witnesses, let us lay aside every weight, and the sin which doth so easily beset us, and let us run with patience the race that is set before us." Heb. 12:1.  And just to prove the point, I will ask those reading this  letter to contact you with their yeas. Folks, Pastor/General Brown may be reached at preacher@.... You may visit his churches most informative website at http://www.link2000.net/~preacher. Say hello to General Brown, and give him your support and prayers. His church is located at:
 
Eternal Grace Baptist Church of New Maysville, Indiana
64th Judicial District
8965 N. Country Road 675 E.
Bainbridge, Indiana
(765) 522-1308
 
-Ron Branson-

J.A.I.L.  (Judicial Accountability Initiative Law)
Use header to subscribe/remove: jail4judges@...
JAIL is a unique addition to our form of government.
JAIL is powerful! It is dynamic! It is America's ONLY hope!
Visit JAIL's informative websites, www.jail4judges.org (& .net)
Other egroups may sign on at jail4judges@egroups.com
JAIL's message is spreading across this nation vociferously!
Support JAIL @ P.O. Box 207, No. Hollywood, CA 91603
 
"..it does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate,
tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds.."
                                                 --Samuel Adams     
"There are a thousand hacking at the branches of evil to one
who is striking at the root."   -- Henry David Thoreau    <><
______________________________________________
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, July 15, 2000 1:50 PM
Subject: Thanks for writing

Dear Ronald Branson:
 
In what way could I, an unworthy servant, be a General to anyone or of help to you?
 
May God be glorified in each of our lives!
 
Sincerely,
 
Pastor Brown
 
"I am only one, but I am one.  I cannot do everything, but I can do something.  And because I cannot do everything, I will not refuse to do the something that I can do.  What I can do, I should do.  And what I should do, by the grace of God, I will do."   - Edward Everett Hale
 
You are welcome to visit my website, if you do let me know.
http://www.link2000.net/~preacher/    or email me preacher@...

#138 From: "jail4judges" <jail4judges@...>
Date: Thu Jul 27, 2000 9:48 pm
Subject: MEET GENERAL BROWN
jail4judges@...
Send Email Send Email
 
 
 
MEET GENERAL BROWN
 
Pastor John:
 
    Your short letter brought tears to my eyes. Okay, you have asked how you can become a General, or be of help in this cause for freedom. I will now attempt to answer your question.
    First, I am thankful that you are not a "government authorized church," and that you take your orders directly from Christ, the Head of the Church. That fact resolves the question as to whom you owe your allegiance. (As you know, government churches are not allowed to influence "Lord Government." This is so because the Government is a jealous Government who will have no other gods before it, and certainly not the man "Christ!") Psalms 2.
    Oh, aren't I sarcastic? But that is my message when at the pulpit. But we're now talking about a church getting involved in nasty politics, a no-no. How dare you challenge the status quo and step out as a church into this forbidden territory. Hey, you might wake up sleeping pastors who might likewise rise up to follow your example. "If we leave him thus alone all men will believe..." (Jn.11:48). They can't allow that now, can they!         What if churches started breaking out of their lethargy and started a revival in this country. "No! No! We can't allow that. It just can't be. Go back to reading your Bible and praying."
    And what if the churches across America, regardless of their denominations, started taking up the cause of JAIL and told the government they've had enough, and insisted on JAIL, and nothing less! (Oh, my, sedition.) And what if the churches in mass declared their independence from Lord Government and said, "We will NOT bend, bow or burn!"
    All this to say, since Christ is your Head, would such a stand as this for your church be pleasing to your Lord. If "Yes," then the cost of such stand is irrelevant. Your choice is clear and not open for discussion! When you step out, there will be no turning back! Executing that choice will automatically make you "Honorable General Brown!" Your troops will gather behind you, and you will find an army beyond your dreams. Does that mean clear sailing to Victory? Absolutely not! And I don't believe I have to explain that.
    Details: Indiana, unfortunately, is not an initiative state, and therefore all efforts to make an amendment to your state's constitution must be done through your legislature. Eternal Grace Baptist Church should start by contacting JAIL's  current JAIL Advocate in Indiana, Sue Marie Coverdale, at injail4judges@... and making an acquaintance. Work with her and plan strategies on how to pursue your goal. Unlike  normal state legislation, the entire country is being broadsided with JAIL, giving legislators little choice.
    JAIL is involved in coalition gathering. JAIL is gaining more force and every greater inroads. As Pastor Brown leads his church into the front lines of the battle, he will be the first church to officially join JAIL's nationwide cause as a church. Presto - General Brown! Your stars await you.
    "There is no man that hath left house, or brethren, or sisters, or father, or mother, of wife, or children, or lands, for my sake, and the gospel's, But he shall receive an hundredfold now in this time, houses, and brethren, and sisters, and mothers, and children, and lands, with persecutions; and in the world to come eternal life." Mk.10: 29, 30.
    You have a whole army out here just waiting for your leadership, General Brown. "Wherefore seeing we also are compassed about with so great a cloud of witnesses, let us lay aside every weight, and the sin which doth so easily beset us, and let us run with patience the race that is set before us." Heb. 12:1.  And just to prove the point, I will ask those reading this  letter to contact you with their yeas. Folks, Pastor/General Brown may be reached at preacher@.... You may visit his churches most informative website at http://www.link2000.net/~preacher. Say hello to General Brown, and give him your support and prayers. His church is located at:
 
Eternal Grace Baptist Church of New Maysville, Indiana
64th Judicial District
8965 N. Country Road 675 E.
Bainbridge, Indiana
(765) 522-1308
 
-Ron Branson-

J.A.I.L.  (Judicial Accountability Initiative Law)
Use header to subscribe/remove: jail4judges@...
JAIL is a unique addition to our form of government.
JAIL is powerful! It is dynamic! It is America's ONLY hope!
Visit JAIL's informative websites, www.jail4judges.org (& .net)
Other egroups may sign on at jail4judges@egroups.com
JAIL's message is spreading across this nation vociferously!
Support JAIL @ P.O. Box 207, No. Hollywood, CA 91603
 
"..it does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate,
tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds.."
                                                 --Samuel Adams     
"There are a thousand hacking at the branches of evil to one
who is striking at the root."   -- Henry David Thoreau    <><
______________________________________________
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, July 15, 2000 1:50 PM
Subject: Thanks for writing

Dear Ronald Branson:
 
In what way could I, an unworthy servant, be a General to anyone or of help to you?
 
May God be glorified in each of our lives!
 
Sincerely,
 
Pastor Brown
 
"I am only one, but I am one.  I cannot do everything, but I can do something.  And because I cannot do everything, I will not refuse to do the something that I can do.  What I can do, I should do.  And what I should do, by the grace of God, I will do."   - Edward Everett Hale
 
You are welcome to visit my website, if you do let me know.
http://www.link2000.net/~preacher/    or email me preacher@...


Messages 109 - 138 of 1790   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright 2010 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines NEW - Help