Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
ibm-netrexx
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Hear how Yahoo! Groups has changed the lives of others. Take me there.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Messages 1308 - 1337 of 1480   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Messages: Simplify | Expand   (Group by Topic) Author Sort by Date ^
1308
... ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ To unsubscribe from this mailing list ( ibm-netrexx ), please send a note to ...
Thomas.Schneider@...
Send Email
Jan 2, 2003
5:26 pm
1309
Hi all, Got this error while trying to compile a simple program. I know that new java 1.3 has been installed... Can anybody give me an idea of what is missing...
PATRICK LEROY
patrick.leroy@...
Send Email
Jan 27, 2003
7:53 pm
1310
Hi Patrick, you have to have tools.jar on the classpath to compile. ... ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ To...
René Vincent Jansen
rvjansen@...
Send Email
Jan 27, 2003
8:09 pm
1311
Thanks all for your responses. I was able to compile now, when including in my CLASSPATH the "/usr/lpp/java/IBM/J1.3/lib/tools.jar" (not...
PATRICK LEROY
patrick.leroy@...
Send Email
Jan 28, 2003
12:13 pm
1312
Hi again, Please help in the following problem: A have a Netrexx CGI that was working well, until systems people upgraded from Java 1.1.8 to Java 2 (1.3). Now,...
PATRICK LEROY
patrick.leroy@...
Send Email
Jan 30, 2003
4:40 pm
1313
Hi, Just received a response from IBM, FYE ... ... The /usr/lpp/internet/bin/htjgiwrapper code only supports the JDK at 1.1.8. It won't work with the 131s JDK....
PATRICK LEROY
patrick.leroy@...
Send Email
Feb 4, 2003
7:29 pm
1314
Hi Patrick, this certainly makes sense. You will be happy with servlets compared to CGI once you get the hang of it, and you will be happy with JSP once you...
René Jansen
rvjansen@...
Send Email
Feb 4, 2003
8:45 pm
1315
Hello there, I have just uploaded release 4.01 of the classic Rexx to NetRexx converter to hy home-page, www.Rexx2Nrx.com The changes include: - function...
Thomas.Schneider@...
Send Email
Feb 5, 2003
10:12 am
1316
Hello Mike, hello all, I've two quite annoying probs with the current NetRexxC compiler: Sample netrexx file: options binary strictcase strictargs [...] ...
Patric Bechtel
bechtel@...
Send Email
Feb 5, 2003
11:56 pm
1317
... The 'write' problem is almost unique in the Java libraries; I think you should be able to achieve what you want by using: outWriter.write(String s) though...
Mike Cowlishaw
MFC@...
Send Email
Feb 6, 2003
8:46 am
1318
... Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 6 Feb 2003 08:42:32 +0000, Mike Cowlishaw wrote: Hello Mike, ... I tried that already. The first version of the code used all variations...
Patric Bechtel
bechtel@...
Send Email
Feb 6, 2003
6:35 pm
1319
Hello there, I am definitely sure that the Java compiler optimizes string concatenation. For the same task I do need 3 seconds in (NetRexx ) and Java, and more...
Thomas.Schneider@...
Send Email
Feb 6, 2003
8:14 pm
1320
... Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 6 Feb 2003 21:07:25 +0100, Thomas.Schneider@... wrote: Hallo Thomas, hello Mike, I've just threw a closer look at the String...
Patric Bechtel
bechtel@...
Send Email
Feb 6, 2003
8:42 pm
1321
Hello Mike, Could you tell me if there is a way to pass a NetRexx "indexed string" as an argument in a method function call? Thanks Geoff Cullen ...
Geoffrey J. Cullen
gjcullen@...
Send Email
Feb 11, 2003
2:21 am
1322
... It's just a Rexx object. Pass it just like any other Rexx string. Mike - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mike...
Mike Cowlishaw
MFC@...
Send Email
Feb 11, 2003
8:31 am
1323
... Hash: SHA1 On Mon, 10 Feb 2003 21:14:45 -0500, Geoffrey J. Cullen wrote: Hello Geoffrey, method test(a=Rexx) static say a['whatever'] method...
Patric Bechtel
bechtel@...
Send Email
Feb 11, 2003
12:35 pm
1324
Hello Geoffry, a NetRexx indexed string is simply declared as type Rexx: Hence you may pass this Rexx String as an argument (of type Rexx) I am pretty sure .. ...
Thomas.Schneider@...
Send Email
Feb 11, 2003
1:13 pm
1325
If you receive this note then it shows that the email address you have registered for the ibm-netrexx mailing list is still valid and the note can be deleted. ...
Ian Stirling
ian@...
Send Email
Feb 11, 2003
4:57 pm
1326
Hello Chris, you should look at the work Professor Rony Flatscher is doing on this issue. he surely can point you to the right URL's. kind regards, Tom...
Thomas.Schneider@...
Send Email
Feb 14, 2003
6:36 pm
1327
Hi Mike and others, I've got two problems, one of which is the secundary one. My main problem is co-dependencies in Java and NetRexx. Co-dependencies are ...
rvjansen <rvjansen@...>
rvjansen@...
Send Email
Feb 18, 2003
12:16 pm
1328
Co-dependencies don't really have a solution. int and boolean (etc.) are Java reserved words. They cannot be used for identifiers. - - - - - - - - - - - - -...
Mike Cowlishaw
MFC@...
Send Email
Feb 18, 2003
12:30 pm
1329
... Mike, isn't it possible to send .nrx and .java into the compiler, and have the generated java and the .java files go unmodified into the java compiler so ...
rvjansen@...
Send Email
Feb 18, 2003
1:53 pm
1330
... so ... No .. NetRexx can't generate the .java files to send into the compiler if it doesn't have information about the semantics of the co-dependent files....
Mike Cowlishaw
MFC@...
Send Email
Feb 18, 2003
2:09 pm
1331
... I typed in the following sample from The Java Developers Almanac 1.4 , Chan et al., page 111, Getting a Constructor of a Class Object: class test { public...
rvjansen@...
Send Email
Feb 18, 2003
4:11 pm
1332
Ah, sorry .. yes, it's coming back to me. Yes I think int.class is allowed -- see 'Special names' in the NetRexx supplement document. NetRexx does anything...
Mike Cowlishaw
MFC@...
Send Email
Feb 18, 2003
5:09 pm
1333
... Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 18 Feb 2003 17:07:01 +0000, Mike Cowlishaw wrote: Hello, shouldn't this be Integer.TYPE ? I used it several times, and it works... ...
Patric Bechtel
bechtel@...
Send Email
Feb 18, 2003
7:07 pm
1334
Hello Mike, just found a (small) bug in the documentation of NetRexx: in the section "Exception and error handling" in the quick start, the following code is...
Patric Bechtel
bechtel@...
Send Email
Feb 19, 2003
4:12 pm
1335
... Quite right -- apologies. The 'quick start' was written before NetRexx did strict exception checking, and as I always expected to rewrite that document...
Mike Cowlishaw
MFC@...
Send Email
Feb 19, 2003
4:30 pm
1336
Hello Mike, is the source of those doc's available online so that we can update it to the current state of the art ?? I've found some other small points as...
Thomas.Schneider@...
Send Email
Feb 19, 2003
7:17 pm
1337
... Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 19 Feb 2003 20:10:53 +0100, Thomas.Schneider@... wrote: Hallo Thomas, hello Mike, I second that. We have four employees...
Patric Bechtel
bechtel@...
Send Email
Feb 20, 2003
11:04 am
Messages 1308 - 1337 of 1480   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Advanced
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help