Wondering if anyone knows where I would find info on Hegel's relationship with John A Roebling (designed Brooklyn Bridge). Particularly interested in whether...
Dear Shane, One person to get in touch with is Larry Stepelevich, emeritus, philosophy, Villanova, and longtime force behind the Hegel society. I also think...
Oops, one further comment -- I don't think it likely that the suspension bridge would be a particularly good candidate to be a manifestation of dialectic (any...
Professor Stillman, I appreciate your comments and suggestions. I became interested in the topic after reading Hart Crane's poem 'To Brooklyn Bridge',...
And -- I am on vacation, so my brain is only partly engaged -- you should look at some paintings also .... PGS ... -- Professor Peter G. Stillman Department...
Dear Andrew, Could you be so kind as to show me where exactly in the text does Kant "distinguish an empirical and a priori synthesis of apprehension"? As I...
AC wrote: ... empirical and a priori synthesis of apprehension ... JH: ... my intuition is: every a priori synthesis of apprehension is empirical, but not...
wmdepot
wmdepot@...
Aug 11, 2008 11:31 am
4783
Dear Juergen, Prima facie, such a conjunction of terms ("empirical ... *and* a priori") goes against Kant's use of them. It seems to me that, in Kant's...
Does anyone know if this is different material from the lecture notes that were added to the Smaller Logic from a number of Hegel's lecture courses? ... ...
It seems to be different. According to J N Findlay's Foreword to Wallace (Oxford: UP, 1975), Wallace used the text prepared by Leopold von Henning, using...
I have the book, and I'm quite excited about it. Unfortunately I've been too busy with other stuff to even get started on it. The book is the manuscript...
My copy is due here on Thursday. Can't wait. Wil ... ************** Looking for a car that's sporty, fun and fits in your budget? Read reviews on AOL Autos. ...
... dear Arkadi, thanx for your objection; I answer that maybe we could stay sort of strongly Humean ... strongly Humean in declaring, that every single event...
wmdepot
wmdepot@...
Aug 13, 2008 12:27 am
4790
I've got a question: In the introduction to the "Encyclopedia" §7 Hegel very clearly distinguishes between philosophy and empirical science. Does anyone know...
The distinction between philosophy and science originates with Aristotle and the Metaphysics. Hb3g ... Hegel very clearly distinguishes between philosophy and...
... Really? Then why was science called natural philophy for most of its history until the 19th Century? Wil ************** It's only a deal if it's where you...
But sorry. Maybe this question is more for the Hegel-Intro-List. I'll move it there. ... From: Birte Schelling To: hegel@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, August...
I don't see why you should turn and run. You might explain why this question interests you. Another question: does distinguishing things terminologically =...
Philosophy is not necessarily "metaphysical speculation". Husserl (and Heidegger in his wake) still speaks of it as "strenge Wissenschaft". Arkadi ... From:...
Wil: Because phusis has been misunderstood. Phusis, ousia, entelecheia, and idea, all refer to Being. Phusis is NOT just nature as we now conceptualize nature....
... That terminology began well before the Renaissance. The scholastics, for example, constantly referred to Aristotelian physics as philosophy of nature, and...
Thank you, Herman, that was well said and interesting. But Aristotle's natural philosophy was still part of philosophy. And that, of course, is still the case...
HB, I will not add to the comments offered here by others, but I have to say that Heidegger's readings of Aristotle and his peculiar glosses on Greek ...
John, Wil: Thanks for your comments, they were helpful regarding my question. The question interests me since I work in philosophy of science (the later 20th...
Dear Birte (if I may), Your self-introduction is very interesting. It appears from the Web that you are at the university in Hamburg? Then you may have run...
Anthony: That is not true. Aristotle quite explicitly treats metaphysical first principles as the most absolutely inerrant and non- hypothetical of all; that...
Dear Birte, You recently wrote: "My latest project is to "translate" Hegel's Logic into terms which people schooled in modern analytic philosophy can...
... That is not the distinction that he makes in the famous text above. The distinction he makes above is between what is prior to us and what is prior "by...